CV493 Lab Assesment 3

CV493-DESIGN OF STEEL STRUCTURE
LABORATORY ASSESSMENT NO. 3

CANTILEVER BEAM SERVICEABILITY CHECKS AND SECTION MOMENT CAPACITY
GROUP MEMBER
‘INOKE LIUTOLO-s11176700
FATUSAMA SEKONA-s11162746
INTRODUCTION
A cantilever is a rigid structural element, like a beam or plate, anchored at one end to a vertical
support, protruding outward. It can be built with trusses or slabs. Cantilever design enables
overhanging structures without external bracing, unlike simply supported beams in post and lintel
systems. Cantilever are widely used in construction side such as cantilever bridge also Balconies.
Cantilever has more benefit while use in construction side. Does not need a support on opposite
of the beams. Also cantilever can create negative bending moment on design which helps counter
act a positive bending moment that can create by the design.
In this task focus on two critical scenarios, Beam Serviceability and Section Moment Capacity.
The given objective of this task which is state Analyzes Cantilever Beams using SAP200 to
checking Serviceability of the bema which determine on deformed and easily determine
deflection of the design and Use theory such Section moment capacity determine which is the
design is safer and can with stand load distribution while consider yield capacity. “In a static
study, it's observed that when cast iron is used as the material for the I-section cantilever beam,
deformation and stress values are lower compared to using steel or stainless steel.” (Reddy 2013)
By doing this lab has benefit in working field familiar with task similar for this lab assessment.
Cantilever beam not only use in the bride as well use in construction side. Familiar with this
scenario can help to improve knowledge as well can determine disadvantage might be facing
when doing the design. “The word deflection generally refers to the deformed shape and position
of a member subjected to bending loads” (EYSIMGOBANAY K. J 2005)
OBJECTIVE
Student has done analyses 250UB31 is work with an apply load by,
 Check cantilever beams for serviceability
 Use Section Moment theory to prove beam is safer
METHODLOGY
In this laboratory procedure, a series of steps are outline to complete this task.
First, create a model and select a blank template. Set up a grid system, with the X-axis extending
to the right and label it with numbers, while the Y-axis is labeled with letters. The spacing frame
in the X-direction should be 3.5 meters. Define the material by importing section properties from
Australia New Zealand, selecting 250UB31, and modify it to adjust strength shear if necessary.
Draw the frame using the snap option for assistance. Assign support conditions by selecting
fixed supports. Define load patterns, such as point loads, considering live loads, and create load
combinations, like "lab 3," incorporating point and live loads. Analyze the load combinations
and apply joint forces, such as 1.5 kN/m for live load and 2 kN/m for dead load. Conduct the
analysis, ensuring correct settings, and save the file as LAB 3 on the desktop. Additionally, view
deformed shapes under dead load cases, analyze moments, and extract forces at member points
as needed.
ACCURACY AND ERRORS

- When completing this task, certain variables may affect accuracy, potentially leading to errors in
laboratory assessments. Skill deficiency can result in designs differing significantly from
theoretical calculations. While software utilizes numerical complexities, theory relies on
assumptions and analytical solutions. Both approaches offer valuable insights into studied
phenomena. Practicing extensively with software enhances knowledge and minimizes errors.
Minor discrepancies may occur in lab reports due to variations in imported materials or rounding
off decimal numbers in theoretical calculations. However, overall, the lab reports are satisfactory.
RESULTS
PART A.
PART B.
DISCUSSION
In the discussion of this experiment, the primary focus lies on the comprehensive analysis of a
cantilever beam, aiming to ascertain its serviceability. This involves two key components:
evaluating the beam's deflection and determining its moment capacity through theoretical
calculations. The analysis begins with a thorough examination of the beam's deflection under the
applied loads. Deflection serves as a critical indicator of a beam's serviceability, as it directly
influences its performance and functionality. By comparing the actual deflection of the beam to
its maximum allowable deflection, engineers can effectively gauge whether the beam meets the
required serviceability criteria.
In conjunction with deflection analysis, theoretical calculations of the beam's moment capacity
are conducted to further ensure the adequacy of its design. Moment capacity represents the
maximum bending moment that a beam's cross-section can withstand before yielding, thereby
providing crucial insights into its structural integrity and safety margin.
Upon scrutinizing the results of the analysis, it becomes evident that the beam's serviceability
hinges on its ability to effectively manage deflection. If the actual deflection aligns with or falls
below the maximum allowable limit, the design meets the prescribed serviceability criteria,
signifying its suitability for the intended application. However, should the actual deflection
exceed the permissible threshold, concerns regarding performance and potential issues arise,
necessitating a reassessment of the design.
In this experiment, the culmination of calculations yields a remarkably low deflection value of
3.49×10−113.49×10−11 meters, underscoring the beam's robustness and adherence to
serviceability standards. Additionally, the comparison between the calculated maximum bending
moment and the beam's moment capacity reaffirms its safety and resilience under the specified
live and dead load conditions. Overall, through a meticulous blend of empirical analysis and
theoretical evaluation, this experiment provides valuable insights into the fundamental principles
governing beam design and underscores the importance of rigorous assessment in ensuring
structural adequacy and safety.
CONCLUSION
In conclusion, this experiment successfully evaluated the serviceability and safety of a cantilever
beam while analyzing forces on diagonal braces. By comparing tension forces through hand
calculations and software analysis, we ensured consistency in results, highlighting the importance
of both methods in structural analysis. Observing beam deflection further underscored the
significance of serviceability considerations. Overall, the experiment effectively met its
objectives, emphasizing the importance of methodical analysis in structural engineering.
REFERENCES
EYSIMGOBANAY K. J, MIBEI OBADIAH. 2005. DEFLECTION OF BEAM. Study Report , University of
Naiboroi Mechanical Laboratories .
Reddy, P C sekhar. 2013. "DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF CANTILEVER BEAM." Internation Journal of
Information Technology and Computing Engineering (Internation) Volume 1 page 1-2.

CV493 Lab Assesment 3

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

CV493 Lab Assesment 3

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

CV493 Lab Assesment 3

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

CV493-DESIGN OF STEEL STRUCTURE

LABORATORY ASSESSMENT NO. 3

ACCURACY AND ERRORS

You might also like