CA Inter SM Study Book 2 Lyst1250
CA Inter SM Study Book 2 Lyst1250
CA Inter SM Study Book 2 Lyst1250
Introduction This chapter focuses on the importance of strategic management in today's competitive business
environment.
• Identify strategic decisions and behaviours within a firm. And discuss the relevance thereof in the
modern business world.
• Acknowledge and appreciate the limitations of strategic management and accept that all
decisions need not be strategic.
• Formulate Strategic Intent - Vision, Mission, Goals and Values. Analyse how each of these plays
an important role in the development of an overall business strategy.
• Describe strategic levels in organizations (Corporate, Business, Functional and Network of relation
between three levels); and discuss the role each plays in final decision making and real execution
of plans
Management Q: What are the two ways to view the term "management"?
• Management can refer to the group of people responsible for running an organization. They
coordinate various resources like manpower, money, materials, and technology to make the
organization purposeful and productive. Their competence and character greatly impact the
success of the organization, and they facilitate organizational change and adaptation. They also
need to facilitate organizational change and adaptation to effectively interact with the
environment.
• Management can also refer to a set of functions and processes carried out by the management
team to achieve organizational objectives. These functions include planning, organizing, directing,
staffing, and control. These functions encompass a wide range of tasks, from goal-setting to
resource allocation and implementing control systems.
Strategy in business refers to the comprehensive plan that a company adopts to achieve its goals and
objectives while dealing with unpredictable and often challenging external forces. It's about aligning
the company's objectives with the means to achieve them, thereby serving as a roadmap for
navigating uncertainty and complexity.
A strategic plan helps a company chart out its future path - defining what it wants to be, what it wants
to do, and where it wants to go. It enables the company to use its resources effectively, respond to
challenges and opportunities, and is fundamental for the company's survival and success.
Q: How did Igor H. Ansoff and William F. Glueck define business strategy?
Igor H. Ansoff suggested that strategy is the consistent thread that defines the organization’s business
or what it plans to do in the future. According to William F. Glueck, strategy is a comprehensive plan
that ensures the organization meets its basic objectives.
Yes, large companies usually have strategies at the corporate, divisional, and functional levels.
Corporate strategies may include plans for growth, mergers, and new investments, while divisional
and functional strategies deal with more specific areas like product lines, market penetration, and
quality ranges.
Business strategies are both proactive and reactive. Proactive strategies involve planned actions to
improve the company's market position and financial performance, while reactive strategies involve
responses to unexpected developments. These strategies are continually updated based on the
company's experiences and changes in the business environment.
• To create a competitive advantage: This means providing something unique and valuable to
customers, which enables the company to outperform its rivals.
Due to the accelerating rate of change in the business environment, strategic management is crucial.
Changes can stem from various factors like technology, deregulation, or globalization. These changes
often blur the boundaries of industries and firms, requiring businesses to adapt.
Strategic management is a cyclical and ongoing process of creating a strategic vision, setting
objectives, crafting a strategy, implementing and evaluating that strategy, and making necessary
adjustments. It includes the development of the company’s vision, understanding both external and
internal factors, formulating the strategy, implementing it, and then evaluating and controlling its
execution.
Q: Why is strategic management essential for survival in the current business environment?
Strategic management is vital for organizations in the current dynamic business environment. It's the
principle of "survival of the fittest," where the "fittest" are not necessarily the largest or strongest,
but those who can adapt to changes. The inability to manage these changes has led to the downfall
of several business giants.
The inability to manage these changes has led to the downfall of several business giants like Bajaj
Scooters, LML Scooters, Murphy Radio, BPL Television, Videocon, Nokia, Kodak and more, hence, the
necessity to understand business strategy.
• It provides direction (Goals and Mission): Strategic management helps define the company's goals
and mission in alignment with the company's vision.
• It prepares for the future: Strategic management identifies business opportunities and charts
paths to reach them.
• It acts as a defense mechanism: Strategic management helps avoid costly mistakes in product
market choices or investments.
• It enhances business longevity: Strategic management helps organizations sustain in the long run
by taking clear stands in their industry, not just surviving on luck.
• It develops core competencies: Strategic management helps the organization develop key
competencies and competitive advantages, facilitating survival and growth.
• Costly process: Strategic management can be an expensive process, involving hiring expert
strategic planners, analyzing external and internal environments, devising strategies, and
implementing them. These costs can be prohibitive for organizations with limited resources,
particularly small and medium-sized ones.
Strategic intent can manifest as the organization's vision and mission statements, business definition,
goals, objectives, or business model.
Q: What roles do vision, mission, goals, objectives, and values play in strategic intent?
The vision is the company's blueprint for its future state, detailing its aspirations. The mission
describes the firm's business, its goals, and how it plans to achieve them. Goals and objectives set the
benchmark against which the organization's performance can be measured and evaluated. Values
guide the organization's decision-making process, embodying the principles the company upholds as
sacrosanct.
Q: How are the goals and objectives different from each other in strategic intent?
Goals are the end results that the organisation attempts to achieve. Objectives are time-based
measurable targets, which help in the accomplishment of goals. However, in practice, no distinction
is made between goals and objectives and both the terms are used interchangeably.
Values, often deeply ingrained in an organization, guide its decision-making process. They reflect the
principles the company upholds and often embody the beliefs of the company's founders. These
values form the unique character of the company and are essential to its identity. An organisation
without values is like an organisation with no real intent.
Vision Q: What does a strategic vision mean in the context of strategic management?
A strategic vision refers to top management's views about the company's direction and its product-
customer-market-technology focus. It delineates management's aspirations for the business,
providing a panoramic view of "where we are to go" and a convincing rationale for why this direction
makes good business sense for the company. In other words, the strategic vision points out a specific
direction, charts a strategic path for the future, and molds the organization's identity.
In the strategy-making process, the company's senior managers consider the directional path the
company should take and what changes in the company’s product-market-customer-technology focus
would improve its current market position and future prospects. This process helps to decide and
commit the company to one path versus another, pushing managers to draw carefully reasoned
conclusions about how to modify the company’s business makeup and the market position it should
stake out. This decision forms the strategic vision for the company.
• A strategic vision requires entrepreneurial thinking to prepare a company for the future.
A mission, in the context of strategic management, is a fundamental statement that defines what a
business does and its purpose. It's a clear articulation of the business's core objectives and aims,
outlining the company's abilities, focus on customers, activities, and business structure. A mission
statement essentially describes what the organization does currently, answering the question "who
we are and what we do".
A mission statement is a brief description of an organization's core purpose and focus, outlining its
key goals and the methods it will use to achieve them. It's important because it serves as a guiding
principle that helps align all stakeholders, including employees, management, and investors, towards
a common purpose.
• A good mission statement should provide the organization with a unique identity, emphasizing its
business focus and future growth trajectory, distinguishing it from similar companies.
• It should clarify the needs the company aims to fulfill, who its target customers are, and what
technologies, skills, and activities it uses and carries out.
• It should be unique to the organization, reflecting its distinct values and goals.
Q: What are some key characteristics of a good mission statement?
Q: What are Peter Drucker and Theodore Levitt parameter for setting a mission?
Management expert Peter Drucker emphasized the importance of clarifying an organization's mission
and accurately defining its business. According to Drucker, every organization should ask the question
"What business are we in?" and find a meaningful, correct answer. This answer should reflect the
company's market or external perspective rather than simply focusing on its production or generic
business activities. This approach helps to articulate a clear mission that reflects the company's real
purpose and drives its strategic planning process.
Goals and Q: What are goals and objectives in a strategic management context?
Objectives
• Goals: are open-ended attributes that denote the future states or outcomes., and often not
quantifiable. They reflect the overarching outcomes an organization aims to achieve and provide
direction for the company's strategic initiatives. For instance, a company's goal could be to
become the market leader in its industry.
• Objectives: Objectives are close-ended attributes which are precise and expressed in specific
terms that an organization strives to achieve within a set timeframe. They provide a clear
direction and steps to fulfill the company's goals. For example, to achieve the goal of becoming a
market leader, an objective could be to increase the company's market share by 10% within two
years.
Q: What are the typical areas around which long-term objectives revolve?
• Profitability
• Productivity
• Competitive Position
• Employee Development
• Employee Relations
• Technological Leadership
• Public Responsibility
Clearly defined objectives provide direction, foster synergy, assist in performance evaluation,
establish priorities, reduce uncertainty, minimize conflicts, stimulate effort, and help in resource
allocation and job design.
Values in the context of strategic management are the fundamental beliefs, principles, and norms
that guide the behavior, decision-making, and operations of an organization. These values serve as
the underlying basis for the organization's culture and strategic direction, shaping how it interacts
with its stakeholders, including employees, customers, shareholders, and the community at large.
Values like integrity, trust, accountability, humility, innovation, and diversity fundamentally shape the
culture and behavior within a company. They provide a compass during challenging situations and
help maintain a consistent approach to decision-making.
Q: How do values influence the company's relationship with its consumers Externally?
Many consumers choose to support businesses whose values mirror their own beliefs. They prefer to
purchase products or services from companies demonstrating ethical behavior and a clear purpose
beyond profit-making
Intent and values, while different, are interconnected concepts in business. Intent refers to the
purpose of doing business, while values are the guiding principles informing the business's decision-
making. Often, the intent is driven by these underlying values, demonstrating that values provide a
broader framework within which business intentions are defined and pursued
The above graphic represents the interconnection of Intent, Vision, Mission, Goals and Values; Values
remain the center/core of Vision, Mission, Goals and putting all them to action. Vision is followed by
Mission, followed by Goals and finally executing via real actions
Strategic Q: What are the three main management levels at large organization?
Levels In
Organisations These organizations typically have three main management levels:
• Corporate level: The topmost level, dealing with the overall company strategy.
• Business level: Deals with strategies for each separate business or division.
• Functional level: Deals with specific operations within each business or division.
The corporate level of management consists of the Chief Executive Officer (CEO), other senior
executives, the board of directors, and corporate staff. They oversee the development of strategies
for the whole organization, including defining the mission and goals of the organization, determining
what businesses it should be in, allocating resources among the different businesses, formulating and
implementing strategies that span individual businesses, and providing leadership for the organization
as a whole.
Corporate-level managers also serve as a link between the people overseeing the strategic
development and the company's owners (the shareholders). They are responsible for ensuring that
the company's strategies align with maximizing shareholders' wealth.
For example, the Adani Group, which operates in various sectors like mining, power generation, and
cement. The Chairman's strategic responsibilities include setting overall objectives, managing
resource allocation, deciding on divestments and acquisitions, and developing strategies that span
multiple businesses. However, the development of strategies specific to each business is the
responsibility of business-level managers.
Q: What is a Strategic Business Unit (SBU) and the Role of General Managers?
A Strategic Business Unit (SBU) is a self-contained division that provides a product or service for a
particular market. The principal general manager at the business level, or the business-level manager,
is the head of the SBU. Their strategic role is to translate the general statements of direction and intent
that come from the corporate level into concrete strategies for individual businesses.
Functional-level managers are responsible for specific business functions or operations within a
company or one of its divisions. Their major strategic role is to develop functional strategies in their
area that help fulfill the strategic objectives set by business- and corporate-level general managers.
They are also responsible for strategy implementation, or the execution of corporate and business-
level plans.
A top-down approach to decision making is when decisions are made solely by leadership at the top,
i.e., the corporate level of management, while the bottom-up approach gives all teams across the
levels a voice in decision making.
Q: What are the three main types of relationships between different levels of management?
• Functional and Divisional Relationship: In this type, each function or division operates
independently under a manager who reports to the business head. Functions can be areas like
Finance, Human Resources, and Marketing, while divisions may be based on products.
• Horizontal Relationship: In this flat structure, all positions, from top management to staff-level
employees, are at the same hierarchical level. This promotes a culture of openness, transparency,
idea sharing, and innovation, making it more suitable for startups.
• Matrix Relationship: This structure creates a grid of levels within the organization, forming teams
from different departments for temporary projects. It helps manage large conglomerates, where
tracking every single team independently can be challenging. In this setup, each functional team
might have more than one manager at the business level. While complex for smaller
organizations, it is beneficial for larger ones.
• Analyse aspects related to competition in the industry with reference to Porter’s five
competitive forces
Strategy evolves over a period of time: Strategies develop gradually, shaped by daily decisions
and influenced by various factors. The current strategy reflects numerous small choices made
over an extended period. While experience informs strategy, it needs updating as outcomes
emerge. Sometimes, to accelerate growth, management might make significant strategic shifts.
Thus, strategy is dynamic and evolves over time.
Balance of external and internal factors: Strategic analysis requires finding a balance between
various challenges since a perfect alignment is rare. When making strategic decisions,
management needs to weigh opportunities against constraints. For instance, while the desire to
enter a new market might drive a decision, the presence of a dominant competitor could limit
options. Some of these challenges can be managed, but others might be beyond the
organization's control.
Risk: While balancing various factors is crucial in strategic analysis, the intricate mix of
environmental variables can disrupt this balance. Factors like competitive markets,
globalization, economic fluctuations, technological changes, and international relations
introduce varying levels of risk. A key component of strategic analysis is recognizing these risks
and evaluating their potential impact.
1. External risk: Arises from mismatches between strategies and environmental forces.
2. Internal risk: Results from forces within the organization or those interacting with it
regularly.
The "business environment" refers to all external factors, influences, or situations that affect
business decisions, plans, and operations. The success of an organization largely depends on its
business environment and its relationship with it.
i. Opportunities and Threats Identification: It reveals consumer needs, legal changes, societal
behaviors, and competitor product launches.
ii. Direction for Growth: By understanding external changes, businesses can strategize and plan
for successful expansion.
iii. Role in Continuous Learning: It motivates managers to consistently update their knowledge
and skills to adapt to business changes.
iv. Image Building: It showcases the business's responsiveness and awareness to environmental
needs, creating a
positive impression.
To flourish, a business must be aware of, assess, and respond to the many opportunities and
threats present in its environment. In order to succeed, the business must not only be aware of
the numerous aspects of its surroundings but also be able to handle and adapt to them. The
business must continuously evaluate its environment and modify its operations in order to
thrive and expand.
Strategic decisions are significant aspects of business management as they are essential for the
success and continued existence of a business. They involve the functions of top management
and the methods of formulating strategic decisions. In a dynamic and unpredictable
environment, the improvement of strategic decision-making becomes a constant endeavor.
Micro and Macro Q: What does the external environment of an organization consist of?
Environment
The external environment of an organization consists of the opportunities and threats operating
externally, apart from the strengths and weaknesses existing internally. This external
environment can be divided into two major categories - micro environment and macro
environment.
The micro environment in a business context refers to the immediate surroundings that directly
influence an organization on a regular basis. This includes suppliers, consumers, marketing
intermediaries, and competitors. These factors are specific to the business and have a direct and
regular impact on its operations.
Q: What are some of the issues to be addressed in the micro environment of a firm?
In the micro environment of a firm, some issues to address include the characteristics and
organization of the employees, the existing customer base, the ways the firm can raise finance,
the suppliers and the development of relationships with them, the local community within
which the firm operates, and the direct competition and their comparative performance.
The macro environment in a business context refers to the larger, external factors that
significantly affect how an organization operates but are typically beyond its direct control and
3. Economic Environment: This refers to the overall economic conditions around the business,
including regional, national, and global levels. It encompasses conditions in the markets for
resources, the supply of inputs and outputs of the business, their costs, and the dependability,
quality, and availability.
4. Political-Legal Environment: This takes into account elements like the general level of political
development, the degree of political morality, the state of law and order, political stability, the
political ideology and practices of the ruling party, the effectiveness of governmental agencies,
and the scope and type of governmental intervention in the economy and industry.
5. Technological Environment: Technology is a crucial factor in the modern age, as it has greatly
influenced how people communicate, do things, and how businesses operate. Technology also
leads to many new business opportunities and can also make some existing business products
and services obsolete.
Each of these elements has the potential to offer opportunities or pose threats to a firm,
depending on how they evolve and how the firm responds to them. It is crucial for businesses
to monitor these macro environmental factors regularly and adjust their strategies accordingly.
PESTLE stands for Political, Economic, Socio-cultural, Technological, Legal, and Environmental.
PESTLE analysis is a framework or tool used to identify and analyze macro-environmental factors
such as political, economic, socio-cultural, technological, legal, and environmental influences on
an organization. It helps in scanning the environmental factors that may affect an organization
or its policy.
PESTLE analysis encourages proactive and structured thinking in decision-making. It's a simple
and quick tool to implement that assists in scanning the environmental factors influencing an
organization. PESTLE analysis assists organizations in making meaningful decisions that consider
all relevant external factors.
Economic factors: These include interest rates, exchange rates, inflation, and growth rates that
affect how businesses operate and make decisions.
Socio-cultural factors: These affect the demand for a company's products and the way it
operates.
Technological factors: These determine barriers to entry and influence costs, quality, innovation,
and outsourcing decisions.
Legal factors: These affect a company's operations, costs, and demand for products, as well as
ease of business.
Environmental factors: These impact various industries by creating new markets or diminishing
existing ones due to growing awareness of climate change.
Internationalization Q: What is internationalization, and why has it emerged as a dominant commercial trend?
of Business
Internationalization is the process by which a business expands into new global markets for
greater earnings, cheaper resources, and achieving greater economies of scale. It helps extend
the lifespan of products and has become prominent due to the benefits of reaching a larger
audience and leveraging global resources.
Q: How does the strategic-management process differ for global firms compared to domestic
firms?
The fundamental process remains the same, but international strategies are more complex due
to additional variables and linkages. International strategy planning is essential for systemically
approaching the global market and identifying opportunities and threats.
• It consists of multiple units in different parts of the world, linked by common ownership.
• These units draw on a shared pool of resources, such as money, information, patents, and
control systems.
• The units follow a common strategy, and its managers and shareholders may be based in
different nations.
• Evaluate global opportunities and threats: Compare them with internal capabilities.
• Describe the global commercial operations scope: Outline the extent and nature of the
business's global activities.
• Create global business objectives: Define specific goals for international growth and
expansion.
• Develop corporate strategies for global business: Formulate strategies that align with the
whole organization's objectives and the specific needs of the global market.
• Need for Growth: Organizations seek expansion and often find opportunities in
international markets, which leads to globalization of their operations.
• Inadequate Domestic Markets: Some businesses find that domestic markets don't offer
enough opportunities or face less competition in international markets.
• Access to Resources: Going global can provide access to reliable or cheaper raw materials,
cheap labor, and a vast pool of talent.
• Reduction in Transportation Costs: By setting up plants closer to the market, companies can
reduce time and costs involved in transportation.
• Generating Higher Sales and Cash Flow: Exporting organizations may look at overseas
manufacturing and sales branches to increase sales and improve cash flow.
• Rise of Services and Regional Economic Integration: The growing service sector and
economic integration between regions provide opportunities for international expansion.
Q: What impact has the changing political landscape had on businesses going global?
Evolving political views have led to the collapse of international trade barriers, redefining the
roles of state and industry. Trends towards increased privatization and less government
interference have opened up opportunities for businesses to expand globally, making
international markets more accessible and attractive.
International Q: Why is the assessment of the international environment essential for an organization
Environment looking to expand globally?
Q: What are the different levels of international environmental analysis, and what do they
entail?
Country Environmental Analysis: This requires an in-depth study of vital environmental factors
in individual countries, including economic, legal, political, and cultural dimensions. Customized
analysis for each country is necessary to develop effective market entrance strategies.
International factors are inherent in strategic management for businesses with global interests.
They encompass various complex elements, ranging from political to cultural, that affect
international operations. The proper understanding and management of these factors are
essential for navigating the challenges and complexities of the global marketplace, thus
becoming vital components of the strategic management process.
A customer is defined as a person or business that buys products or services from another
organization. Customers are crucial for businesses because they provide revenue, and without
customers, organizations cannot exist. Businesses often compete for customers by marketing
their products aggressively or lowering their prices to increase their customer bases.
Though the terms are often used interchangeably, there is a subtle difference between a
customer and a consumer. A customer is the purchaser of products and services, while a
consumer is an individual or business that actually consumes or utilizes the products and
services. For example, a parent may buy groceries (customer), while all family members
consume them (consumers).
Businesses typically categorize customers based on demographics such as age, race, gender,
ethnicity, economic level, and geographic region. By understanding these factors, they can
develop a profile of an ideal customer, fine-tune their marketing strategies, and adjust their
inventory. This helps businesses to attract more customers and better tailor their products and
services to meet specific needs and preferences.
Customer Analysis Q: What is customer analysis, and why is it essential in a strategic business plan?
Customer analysis is the examination and evaluation of consumer needs, desires, and wants. It
identifies target clients and determines what they want, defining how a product or service can
meet those needs. Customer analysis is essential in a strategic business plan because it guides
the development of products and services that resonate with the target market, enabling better
alignment with customer expectations and preferences.
Q: What are the key components and activities involved in customer analysis?
Customer analysis includes several key components and activities, such as:
Successful businesses use customer analysis to continuously monitor the behavior of existing
and prospective customers. They utilize the insights gained from this analysis to develop
products and services that are closely aligned with customer needs, desires, and wants. This
targeted approach helps them to build stronger relationships with customers, enhance
customer satisfaction, and ultimately drive growth and profitability.
Customer Q: What is customer behaviour, and why is it important for businesses to understand it?
Behaviour
Customer behaviour is the study of how customers purchase products, including their shopping
frequency, product preferences, and perceptions of marketing, sales, and service offerings.
Q: What are the three conceptual domains that influence consumer behaviour?
Internal Influences: These are psychological factors internal to the customer, such as motivation
and attitudes, which affect decision-making.
Decision Making: This domain includes the rational process by which consumers seek
information, evaluate options, weigh pros and cons, and make final choices. This process may
vary in complexity depending on the significance of the purchase.
Search for Alternatives: Listing desirable alternatives to fulfil the need or desire.
Seeking Information: Gathering information on available alternatives and weighing their pros
and cons.
Making a Final Choice: Selecting the best option based on the evaluation.
This process may be more elaborate and rational for significant purchases like cars or appliances,
and more impulsive for smaller purchases like snacks or soft drinks.
Post-decision processes occur after a customer has made a decision and purchased a product.
This stage involves evaluating the outcome and reacting based on satisfaction. A satisfied
customer may make repeat purchases and recommend the product to others, while a
dissatisfied customer may experience dissonance and may avoid repurchasing or recommending
the product. Post-decision evaluation, therefore, plays a critical role in future buying behavior
and influences a company’s reputation and customer retention.
Products are either tangible or intangible: Businesses offer products that can be categorized as
tangible or intangible. Tangible products, like cars or books, can be physically handled and seen.
In contrast, intangible products, such as telecom services or insurance, do not have a physical
presence.
Product has a price: The pricing of a product is influenced by various factors, including supply
and demand dynamics, market conditions, the product's quality, marketing strategies, and the
Products have certain features that deliver satisfaction: Features are specific components of a
product designed to satisfy consumer needs. They play a pivotal role in determining the
product's price and are often adjusted during its development to enhance the user experience.
These features, which can range from functional attributes to design elements, contribute to
the overall experience a customer has from the point of purchase to the end of the product's
useful life.
Product is pivotal for business: Products are central to business operations. They drive various
processes, including production, sales, marketing, and logistics, making them the cornerstone
around which businesses strategize and operate.
A product has a useful life: Every product has a defined usable life, post which it might require
replacement. Additionally, products undergo a life cycle, transitioning through stages like
introduction, growth, maturity, and decline. As products reach the end of their life cycle, they
might need reinvention or might become obsolete, as seen with fixed-line telephones being
replaced by mobile phones.
Q: What are the four stages of the PLC, and what characterizes each stage?
Introduction Stage: This is marked by slow sales growth, almost negligible competition, relatively
high prices, and limited markets. The growth in sales is slow due to lack of customer awareness.
Growth Stage: During this phase, demand expands rapidly, prices fall, competition increases,
and the market expands. Customers become aware of the product and show interest in
purchasing it.
Maturity Stage: This stage experiences a slowdown in the growth rate, with tough competition
and market stabilization. Profits may decrease due to competition, and organizations focus on
maintaining stability.
Decline Stage: This final stage witnesses a sharp downward drift in sales and profits, often
because a new product replaces the existing one. Strategies may include diversification or
retrenchment to remain in the market.
The PLC approach allows businesses to diagnose the stages of various products or businesses
within their portfolio. By identifying the specific stage, companies can make strategic choices
tailored to each stage. For example:
Maturity Stage: These businesses can be used as sources of cash for investment in other areas
needing resources.
By utilizing the PLC concept, a balanced portfolio of businesses can be developed, enabling
companies to allocate resources and strategies more effectively based on each product's or
business's stage in its life cycle.
Market Q: What is a market, and what are the different forms it can take?
A market is a place where buyers and sellers engage in the exchange of goods and services for
a price. It can be physical, like a departmental store, or virtual, like an online market. The term
"market" can also refer to specific contexts like the stock exchange, a particular commodity
market like grain or vegetables, or even a global industry like the oil market.
Q: How do the goals of marketing focus on the customer experience and relationships?
The main goals of marketing are delivering the best customer experience and establishing,
maintaining, and growing relationships with customers. By understanding and meeting
customer needs, businesses aim to create value and satisfaction, fostering loyalty and long-term
relationships.
Q: What are the different orientations in product marketing, and how have they evolved?
Product Orientation: Focuses on quality, performance, design, or features, believing that buyers
choose the best products.
Value Creation Q: What is value creation, and how does it relate to products and services?
Value creation is the process by which a company increases the worth of goods, services, or
even the entire business system. It's measured by various attributes like quality, availability,
durability, performance, and services that customers are willing to pay for. The concept
emphasizes providing more worth to customers and has expanded to include value creation for
stakeholders.
Value creation gives businesses a competitive advantage by influencing the value customers
place on products, the price charged, and the costs of creating those products. By enhancing the
perceived value and utility of products or services, businesses can demand higher prices,
differentiate themselves from competitors, and earn above-average profits or returns.
Q: What are the strategies for achieving competitive advantage through value creation, as
described by Michael Porter?
Michael Porter argues that competitive advantage can be generated through differentiation or
cost advantage. Differentiation means providing superior value through special product
features, quality, or after-sales customer service, allowing a company to demand higher prices.
Cost advantage focuses on achieving lower production costs while maintaining comparable
quality. These strategies influence a company's ability to succeed in the long run.
Value creation is closely tied to consumer perception. The value consumers place on a product
reflects the utility or satisfaction they gain from it, which may be more than its actual cost. This
excess amount, where consumers value the product or service more than it costs them, is
referred to as value creation. It emphasizes the importance of understanding customer needs
and preferences in shaping products and services that resonate with the target audience.
Value Chain Q: What is Value Chain Analysis (VCA) and Who introduced the concept of Value Chain
Analysis (VCA) Analysis?
The concept of Value Chain Analysis was linked to an analysis of an organization's competitive
advantage by Michael Porter.
Value chain analysis is a tool used to examine the origin of competitive advantage. It divides
organizations into two strategically important groups of activities: primary activities and
supporting activities. By analyzing these activities, businesses can comprehend potential sources
for differentiation and understand the organization's cost behavior. It provides insights into how
value is added at each stage of production and helps in identifying areas where value can be
maximized.
Companies that generate more value are more likely to profit than those that generate less
value.
VCA helps businesses identify areas for improvements within their processes. It allows
companies to see where cost improvements can be made, where value creation can be
improved, and how to organize resources and activities into systems that create value for
consumers.
1. Inbound Logistics: Activities related to receiving, storing, and distributing the inputs, such
as transportation and warehousing.
2. Operations: Transformation of inputs into the final product or service, such as machining,
packaging, assembly, testing, etc
4. Marketing and Sales: Activities that make consumers aware of and able to purchase the
product/service.
Each of these groups of primary activities are linked to support activities include:
Value Chain Analysis can be used by businesses of all sizes, from sole proprietorships to
multinational organizations. By examining each activity in the value chain, organizations can
identify and implement improvements that align with their unique processes and needs, thereby
gaining a competitive edge in the market.
The main goal of Industry Environment Analysis is to estimate the competitive pressures a
business is facing and anticipate future pressures. This helps in determining whether the
industry is attractive, profitable and assists in aligning strategies with the changing industry
conditions.
Attractiveness of Q: What factors are considered when assessing the attractiveness or unattractiveness of an
Industry industry, and why is this assessment important?
Assessing the attractiveness of an industry is vital for understanding growth and profit
prospects, and for making informed investment decisions. Factors considered include:
Ability to defend against factors making the industry unattractive: Can challenges be
counteracted?
Impact on success in other industries: How does participation affect other business interests?
Understanding these factors helps companies decide whether an industry presents an attractive
business opportunity or if its prospects are gloomy.
Q: Is the attractiveness of an industry the same for all firms within it?
No, attractiveness is relative, not absolute. An industry environment that may be unattractive
to weak competitors might be attractive to strong competitors.
Understanding the competitive landscape involves a systematic process that includes the
following steps:
1. Identify the Competitor: Recognize who the competitors are in the industry, and gather data
about their market share.
2. Understand the Competitors: Investigate the products and services offered by the
competitors using various sources like market research reports, social media, and industry
insights.
3. Determine the Strengths of the Competitors: Analyze what the competitors do well, their
financial positions, cost and price advantages, likely future actions, distribution network, and
human resource strengths.
4. Determine the Weaknesses of the Competitors: Identify areas where competitors are lacking
or weak through consumer reports, reviews, and financial analysis.
5. Put all of the Information Together: Compile all the information to infer what the competitors
are not offering and identify gaps that the firm can fill. Analyze the information to understand
the improvements needed and how to exploit the weaknesses of competitors.
Q: How does the competitive strategy of a firm involve both creation and protection of
competitive advantage?
The competitive strategy of a firm involves both the creation and protection of competitive
advantage:
Porter's Five Forces Q: What is Porter's Five Forces Model, and how is it used in understanding competition?
Model
Porter's Five Forces Model is a framework used to analyze the competitive forces within an
industry that affect its attractiveness and profitability. It consists of five forces that examine
competition, suppliers, buyers, the threat of substitutes, and the threat of new entrants. By
analyzing these factors, businesses can understand the competitive landscape and make
strategic decisions.
The five-forces model, developed by Michael E. Porter, is a powerful tool used by strategists to
analyze the competitive forces within an industry by undertaking the following steps
Step 1: Identify the Specific Competitive Pressures Associated with Each of the Five Forces
The five forces include:
Threat of New Entrants: Examine barriers to entry like capital requirements, brand loyalty,
government regulations, etc.
Bargaining Power of Buyers: Look at the influence customers have over prices and terms.
Bargaining Power of Suppliers: Consider the power suppliers have over prices and supply
conditions.
Threat of Substitute Products or Services: Evaluate the availability of alternatives that might
attract customers away from the industry's products.
Rivalry Among Existing Competitors: Analyze the degree of competition within the industry.
For each of the forces, analyze how fierce, strong, moderate to normal, or weak the pressures
are. This requires qualitative and quantitative analysis. It's not a simple process, and strategists
must use data, research, market trends, and expert judgment to classify each force. The five
forces are not static and might change as the industry evolves, so continuous monitoring and
evaluation are required.
Step 3: Determine Whether the Collective Strength of the Five Competitive Forces is Conducive
to Earning Attractive Profits
After assessing each force, one can analyze the combined effect to gauge the overall
attractiveness of the industry. If the forces are generally weak, there may be potential for high
profit. If they are strong, profit potential might be low.
In conclusion, by undertaking these three steps, a strategist can gain valuable insights into the
competition in a given industry, helping inform decisions and strategy. It's a complex process
that requires careful analysis and continuous evaluation as markets and conditions change.
Q: What is the threat of new entrants, and how does it impact the existing firms in an industry?
The threat of new entrants refers to the potential for new competitors to enter an industry. This
can reduce profitability for existing firms by increasing supply and competition, even at lower
prices. New entrants can erode existing firms' market share, place a limit on prices, and affect
the overall profitability of existing players. The bigger the new entrant, the more severe the
competitive effect.
Q: What are the common barriers to entry that existing firms can use to discourage new
entrants, and how do they work?
Capital Requirements: Entering an industry may require a large amount of capital for things like
manufacturing, marketing, and distribution. Firms lacking these funds are effectively barred,
enhancing the profitability of existing firms.
Economies of Scale: In industries where economies of scale are prevalent, larger firms can
produce high volumes of goods at successively lower costs. This can discourage new entrants
who may not have the capacity to produce at the same volume and cost.
Product Differentiation: Existing firms may have unique products that are physically or
perceptually different. Creating such differences may be too costly for new entrants, especially
in industries like personal care products and cosmetics.
Switching Costs: If buyers incur substantial financial or psychological costs in switching between
firms, they may be reluctant to change. This includes costs like testing a new product,
negotiating new contracts, or modifying facilities for product use.
Brand Identity: Building a recognizable brand takes substantial resources over a long period.
New entrants may find it difficult to build brand identity, especially for high-cost products.
Access to Distribution Channels: Existing firms may have control over physical distribution
channels, and they can impede their use by new firms. Even with the growth of the internet,
control over distribution channels can sustain a barrier to entry.
Possibility of Aggressive Retaliation: The mere threat of aggressive actions like reducing prices
or increasing advertising budgets by existing firms can deter new entrants. For example, the
These barriers collectively work to slow down or impede the entry of new firms, protecting the
market share and profitability of existing companies. They are strategic tools that can be used
to maintain a competitive edge in the market.
Q: What is the bargaining power of buyers, and how does it influence the competitive
condition of an industry?
The bargaining power of buyers refers to the ability of customers to negotiate with producers
for lower prices or better services. This force can become significant depending on the
possibilities of buyers forming groups or cartels, especially in the industrial products sector. The
bargaining power of buyers can influence not only the prices that a producer can charge but also
the costs and investments required to meet the demands of powerful buyers.
Q: Under what conditions is the leverage of buyers particularly evident, and how does it affect
the industry?
Buyers have full knowledge of the products and their substitutes: When buyers are well-
informed about the products, their sources, and available alternatives, they can negotiate more
effectively.
They are big buyers: If buyers spend a significant amount on the industry's products, they can
exert more pressure on producers to secure favorable terms.
The industry's product is not critical to the buyer's needs: If the product is not essential to the
buyer, and there are more buyers than suppliers, they can easily switch to substitutes. This
ability to switch enhances their negotiating power.
These conditions can affect pricing strategies, cost structures, and the level of investment
required to meet customer demands. It shapes the competitive landscape of an industry, and
existing firms must strategize accordingly to maintain profitability and competitive positioning.
Q: What is the bargaining power of suppliers, and how does it influence an industry?
The bargaining power of suppliers refers to the ability of suppliers to negotiate terms with
companies. This power can be considerable, especially if the supplier's offering is specialized or
if the suppliers are limited in number. The bargaining power of suppliers determines the cost of
raw materials and other inputs, influencing the attractiveness and profitability of the industry.
When suppliers have significant bargaining power, they can affect the cost structure and
competitive dynamics within the industry.
Q: Under what conditions can suppliers command significant bargaining power, and how does
this affect the industry?
Their products are crucial to the buyer, and substitutes are not available: This gives suppliers
leverage as buyers have limited alternatives.
They can erect high switching costs: If it's expensive or difficult for buyers to switch to a different
supplier, the existing suppliers have more negotiating power.
These conditions can influence the profitability of an industry by affecting the cost of raw
materials and other inputs. Firms must be aware of and strategize around these factors to
maintain competitive positioning and profitability.
Q: What is the nature of rivalry among existing players in an industry, and how does it impact
the industry's attractiveness and profitability?
The rivalry among existing players is the competition that most people understand as the core
of business competition. It influences strategic decisions at various levels, including pricing,
advertising, and cost pressures. The intensity of rivalry can directly affect profitability by
influencing the costs of suppliers, distribution, and attracting customers. The more intense the
rivalry, the less attractive the industry becomes, often leading to cutthroat competition and low
profitability.
Q: What are the specific conditions that influence the intensity of rivalry, and how do they
affect industry profitability?
Several conditions can shape the intensity of rivalry in an industry, each having unique effects
on profitability:
Industry Leader: A strong industry leader with significant financial resources can discourage
price wars by threatening or engaging in aggressive price-cutting. Smaller rivals often avoid
initiating such contests, knowing the leader can outlast them. This leadership can stabilize
pricing but becomes less effective with more competitors.
Number of Competitors: The more rivals in the industry, the harder it is for a leader to exert
pricing discipline. More players mean more complexity in communicating expectations and
maintaining pricing stability, often leading to more aggressive competition.
Fixed Costs: Industries with high fixed costs create motivation for firms to utilize their capacity
fully. When there is excess capacity, firms may cut prices to increase sales volume, leading to
lower profitability for all industry participants.
Exit Barriers: If it's challenging for firms to leave the industry due to specialized assets or other
factors, rivalry may remain intense as competitors continue to exert pressure on pricing and
profitability. Lower exit barriers often lead to higher profitability as less competitive firms can
exit more easily.
Slow Growth: In industries experiencing slow growth, competition for existing market share
becomes more fierce. Firms may fight harder to grow or even maintain their positions, leading
to increased rivalry and often reduced profitability.
Q: What is the threat of substitutes, and how can it become a major constituent of
competition in an industry?
The threat of substitutes refers to the potential for alternative products to replace existing ones
in an industry. Substitute products that offer a price advantage or performance improvement
can drastically alter the competitive landscape. For example, synthetic fiber became a substitute
Q: How does the availability of substitutes influence industry profitability, and can you
provide examples of such substitutes?
Q: How can the five forces together determine industry attractiveness and profitability?
The collective strength of these forces influences factors like cost, investment, and more that
decide industry profitability. Understanding these forces allows a business to gauge its
strengths, weaknesses, and future opportunities within the industry, helping them adapt their
strategies to remain competitive.
Experience Curve Q: What is the experience curve, and what are its key features and implications in an industry?
The experience curve, akin to a learning curve, explains the efficiency increase gained by
workers through repetitive productive work. It's based on the concept "we learn as we grow,"
meaning unit costs decline as a firm accumulates experience in cumulative volume production.
Competitive Advantage: Experience may provide an advantage over competition and act as a
key barrier to entry.
Stronger "Experience Effect": Large and successful organizations possess a stronger experience
effect, leading to lower unit costs and a competitive cost advantage. The implications are that
larger firms tend to have lower unit costs compared to smaller companies, benefiting from
factors like learning effects, economies of scale, product redesign, and technological
improvements.
Key Success Factors Q: What are Key Success Factors (KSFs), and why are they vital for a business?
(KSFs)
Key Success Factors (KSFs) are specific elements that are essential for a company's ability to
compete and succeed in the marketplace. They are critical attributes, resources, competencies,
or business outcomes that spell the difference between success or failure in a particular
industry.
Example: In apparel manufacturing, the KSFs are appealing designs and colour combinations (to
create buyer interest) and low-cost manufacturing efficiency (to permit attractive retail pricing
and ample profit margins).
Q: How can businesses identify Key Success Factors for their industry?
Identifying Key Success Factors requires in-depth analysis and understanding of the industry and
competitive environment. The answers to the following questions can help in identifying KSFs:
• Customer Preferences: What are the critical product attributes or service aspects that
influence customers' choices among competing brands? What do customers value most?
• Sustainable Competitive Advantage: What does it take for companies to achieve and
maintain a long-term competitive edge in the industry?
These questions require detailed market research, competitor analysis, customer insights, and
evaluation of internal capabilities to answer effectively.
Q: Why is determining the industry's key success factors (KSFs) crucial, and how can it
influence a company's competitive strategy?
Determining the industry's KSFs is essential for understanding what's vital for competitive
success. Managers need to discern which resources are competitively valuable and which
factors are pivotal to success. Misunderstanding these factors can lead to a misguided strategy.
However, with a clear grasp, organizations can focus on these KSFs to outperform rivals and
achieve a sustainable competitive advantage.
Q: How do KSFs vary across industries and time, and why is it essential for managers to
prioritize them correctly?
KSFs differ across industries and can change within the same industry due to evolving driving
forces and competitive conditions. Typically, an industry has three or four KSFs at any time, with
one or two being paramount. Managers should prioritize these factors to ensure long-term
success and avoid diluting focus by listing minor factors.
Internal Q: What is the internal environment of an organization and how does it differ from one
environment organization to another?
Q: Who are the stakeholders in the internal environment and why is understanding this
environment crucial?
Stakeholders in the internal environment include top management, employees, the board of
directors, and investors. Understanding this environment is essential because it encompasses
the ethics, principles, work atmosphere, and other cultural aspects that drive an organization's
success.
Strategic analysis helps organizations identify strengths, weaknesses, and areas of improvement
within the internal environment, ensuring alignment with their goals and objectives.
A: Stakeholders are individuals or entities that have an interest in, or impact on, the business or
corporate strategy of an organization. They possess the power to influence the strategy or
performance of that organization.
Q: How has the view of a firm in relation to stakeholders evolved over time?
Historically, a firm was primarily seen as an extension of its owners and shareholders. However,
the modern perspective views a firm as a coalition of stakeholders, which includes not just the
Identifying key stakeholders is crucial because each group or individual exerts varying levels of
influence and has different interests concerning the organization. Their expectations can
significantly impact the organization's strategy, and any misalignment in objectives might lead
to unfavorable outcomes.
Q: Can you provide an example of how stakeholder interests might influence an organization's
strategy?
In the healthcare innovation sector, there's often a long gap between initial investment in
research and achieving a commercial outcome. Shareholders, primarily focused on quick profits,
might be hesitant to support long-term research investments, fearing they won't see returns in
the near future. This clash of objectives between long-term innovation and short-term
profitability can influence the organization's strategic decisions.
Managing stakeholders is vital because a project often involves balancing the competing
interests of various stakeholders. Determining who needs information, who should provide
The Mendelow Stakeholder matrix, also known as the Stakeholder Analysis matrix or the Power-
Interest matrix, is a framework designed to help manage and prioritize key stakeholders based
on their power and interest in a organization.
No, while it might seem ideal for all stakeholders to possess high power and interest, in reality,
stakeholders vary. Some might have more power but less interest, and vice versa. For instance,
a significant shareholder might have high power and interest, while a major competitor might
have high power but less interest in the success of a rival organization.
Those with high power and high interest are deemed incredibly important and need close
management, often requiring significant time and resources. For instance, a CEO, with high
power and interest in a project's success, should be kept informed frequently.
Stakeholders with low power and low interest, such as research institutes seeking organization
data, fall into the "LOW PRIORITY" category. They should be monitored occasionally, with
minimal effort and resources expended on them.
1. Keep Satisfied Stakeholders: These have high power but less interest. Organizations
should provide them with regular information to keep them content. Examples include
banks, government, and customers.
3. Low Priority Stakeholders: Stakeholders with low power and less interest.
Organizations should monitor them without taking significant actions to meet their
expectations. Examples include business magazines and media houses.
4. Keep Informed Stakeholders: These stakeholders have low power but high interest.
Organizations should communicate with them adequately to ensure no major issues
arise and can benefit from their feedback. Examples are employees, vendors, suppliers,
and legal experts.
The stakeholder environment is highly dynamic, meaning stakeholders can shift between
categories based on changes in the external environment or organizational actions. For
instance, if an organization breaches a regulation like GST compliance, the regulatory body
might move from being a "KEEP SATISFIED" stakeholder to a "KEY PLAYER." Similarly, media
houses might shift from "LOW PRIORITY" to "KEEP INFORMED." Therefore, it's crucial to re-
analyze the Mendelow's grid regularly or when there's a significant change in the environment
to manage stakeholders effectively.
Internal analysis Q: Is there a standard way to assess the current performance of a business?
& Strategic Drivers
No, the assessment of current performance can vary widely. It's subjective and depends on
management's chosen metrics and business approach. Some businesses might be profit-driven,
while others could be purpose-driven or follow other metrics.
Strategic drivers focus on what sets an organization apart from its competitors. This
differentiation can be in terms of products, services, market positioning, customer relationships,
or any other unique value proposition.
These drivers help an organization understand its position in the market, its relationship with
customers, the value it offers through its products or services, and how it reaches its target
audience.
Industry and Q: Why is understanding the internal environment's relative position crucial for an
Markets organization?
Understanding the internal environment's relative position helps an organization gauge its
standing in the industry and market. This knowledge aids in strategic decision-making,
identifying competitive advantages, and spotting areas of improvement.
Example: Companies like Maruti, Mahindra, Tata Motors, TVS, and Bajaj Auto primarily sell
automobiles, so they are categorized under the Automotive Industry. Similarly, brands like Zara,
H&M, Marks & Spencer, Pantaloons, Westside, and Uniqlo, which primarily sell apparels and
accessories, are grouped under the apparels industry.
A market is the collective of all buyers and sellers in a specific area or region. It represents the
interactions where the value, cost, and price of items are determined by the forces of supply
and demand.
Markets can vary in their nature. They can be physical entities, like local markets or shopping
malls, or virtual, like e-commerce websites and apps. Additionally, markets can be local, serving
a specific region or country, or global, catering to multiple countries or worldwide.
Q: What is the purpose of analyzing industries and markets and what tool is commonly used
for this analysis?
A common tool used for industry and market analysis is "Strategic Group Mapping," which
visually represents organizations in a particular industry based on key strategic dimensions,
allowing for a clearer comparison and understanding of competitive landscapes.
Q: How is a strategic group defined and what is the procedure for constructing its map?
A strategic group comprises rival firms that have similar competitive approaches and market
positions. These firms can share various similarities, such as product-line breadth, price/quality
range, distribution channels, technological approaches, or services offered to buyers.
Certainly. Let's consider companies ABC, DEF, GHI, XYZ, and PQR, all selling laptops. On a
strategic group map:
• The Y-Axis represents the company's reputation.
• The X-Axis represents the range of their products.
• The size of each company's bubble indicates its reputation, and its position on the Y-
Axis further emphasizes this.
• The position on the X-Axis shows the breadth of their product range.
From the map, we can deduce that ABC, despite having fewer models, enjoys a strong
reputation. GHI, with a broad product range, is the most reputed. XYZ and GHI offer a similar
number of models, but GHI has a significantly better reputation.
A customer is the individual or entity that purchases a product or service, while a consumer is
the one who ultimately uses or consumes that product or service. For instance, a parent buying
stationery is the customer, but the child using the stationery is the consumer.
Understanding both is crucial because while pricing strategies might be directed towards the
customer, product design, usability, and value creation should focus on the consumer.
Recognizing the needs and preferences of both groups ensures that products or services are
both purchased and used satisfactorily.
Q: Why is understanding different types of customers crucial for an organization and how
can they be categorized?
Understanding the various types of customers is essential because it helps organizations tailor
their products or services to meet specific needs. Different customers have different
requirements and may necessitate distinct sales models or distribution channels.
For instance, taking the example of a headphones brand: Customers can be segmented based
on their spending capacity into high value buyers, medium value buyers, and low value buyers.
But beyond just spending capacity, they can also be categorized based on usage patterns (e.g.,
professional musicians, casual listeners, or fitness enthusiasts), preferred features (e.g., noise-
cancelling, wireless, or with a microphone), or even demographics (e.g., age, gender, or
location). Such categorization not only helps businesses identify their primary target segments
but also pinpoints areas of potential growth or improvement.
Analyzing customer trends and profitability is vital because customers drive an organization's
profits. By examining these trends, businesses can identify issues, target growth areas, and
make informed decisions to enhance profitability.
Product/Services Q: What is the significance of analyzing products and services in relation to markets?
Analyzing products and services in relation to markets helps businesses identify their offerings'
performance and determine their competitive stance. It addresses the fundamental question:
What business are we in, and how can we outperform competitors in each product or service
category?
Q: How is a product defined? How is a product defined, why is its management essential, and
how can it be classified?
It requires strategies for managing its lifecycle, branding, packaging, and other features like
warranties. Strategies are crucial for managing existing products over time, introducing new
ones, and discontinuing unsuccessful products. As products and markets are dynamic, capturing
these dynamics through policies and strategies ensures that the business remains competitive
and relevant.
Product differentiation is the process by which organizations distinguish their products from
those of competitors. This differentiation can be real or psychological. The goal is to persuade
customers to believe that a particular product is unique or superior, regardless of whether the
differentiation is tangible or merely perceived.
Example: shampoos like Head & Shoulders, Olay, Old Spice, and Pantene have different
branding but are all produced by the same company, P&G. The differentiation here is primarily
in branding and marketing, even if the core product might have similar attributes.
Q: How do organizations formalize product differentiation and why are brands significant in
the business world?
Brands play a pivotal role in building a product's and even a company's image. Through
advertising and other promotional strategies, customers become familiar with and loyal to
specific brands over time. This brand loyalty can lead to repeat purchases and a strong customer
base.
Q: What are the primary objectives to consider when designing pricing strategies for a new
product entering the market?
3. Direct Marketing: Direct Marketing uses advertising media that directly interacts with
consumers, prompting a direct response. This includes methods like catalogue selling,
e-mail, and TV shopping.
8. Place Marketing: Place Marketing promotes specific locations, like business sites or
tourist destinations, to influence attitudes and behaviors towards them
10. Differential Marketing: Differential Marketing targets multiple market segments with
separate offers for each. For instance, a company might have different soap brands for
various market segments.
12. Concentrated Marketing: Concentrated Marketing targets a large share of one or a few
sub-markets, often taking the form of Niche marketing.
Channels Q: In the context of business, what are channels and can you provide examples of how
different companies use them?
Channels refer to the distribution systems through which organizations distribute their products
or provide their services to customers. For instance:
Lakme - Distributes its products through retail stores, intermediary stores like Nykaa and
Westside, online platforms like Amazon, Flipkart, and its own website.
Boat Headphones - Primarily sells online via e-commerce platforms like Flipkart and Amazon.
Coca Cola - Available at retail shops nationwide and online platforms like Dunzo and Blinkit.
Channels are vital because they determine a business's reach to its customers. A robust and
wide channel network can give a business a competitive edge, act as barriers to entry for new
players, and facilitate growth into new markets.
1. Sales Channel - The sales channel involves intermediaries responsible for selling the
product to the end user. It answers the question: Who sells to whom for the product to
reach the end user? An example is fashion designers using agencies to sell to retail
organizations.
3. Service Channel - The service channel relates to entities providing necessary services to
support the product as it moves through the sales channel and post-purchase. For
products requiring installation or customer assistance, this channel is vital. An example
is a Bosch dishwasher sold in a showroom and installed by a Bosch-contracted plumber.
Channel analysis is essential for businesses aiming to scale up and expand into new geographies
and markets. It helps in understanding the best channels to reach new customers and ensures
alignment with the business's growth strategy.
• For a healthcare brand targeting elderly customers, offline channels where agents physically
reach out might be more effective since many elderly individuals may not use smartphones.
• A new drink brand aiming for market penetration would benefit from using multiple
channels, from physical stores to online campaigns, to maximize visibility and customer
reach.
• Brands like Coca Cola, HUL, Patanjali, Asian Paints, and Ola have created competitive
advantages through strong distribution channels. For instance, the widespread availability
of Coca Cola even in remote locations is a testament to its robust distribution network.
Competency is a combination of skills and techniques rather than an individual skill or separate
technique. For core competencies, it involves integrating many resources, making the whole
organization utilize these individual capabilities.
1. Hindustan Unilever Limited (HUL): Marketing and Sales is a core competence, allowing
HUL to launch new brands successfully.
2. Wal-Mart: Its core competency lies in lowering its operating costs, enabling it to price
goods lower than most competitors due to its large sales volume.
Q: What are the three main areas of core competencies as identified by C.K. Prahalad and
Gary Hamel?
Core competencies are formed by superior integration of technological, physical, and human
resources. They represent both tangible skills and intangible assets like cultural capabilities,
ability to manage change, and team working.
Criteria for building Q: What are the four criteria for determining core competencies that lead to sustainable
Core Competencies competitive advantage?
2. Rare: A capability is rare when very few competitors possess it. If many rivals have the same
capability, it's unlikely to provide a competitive advantage to any specific firm. The
uniqueness of the capability in comparison to competitors is what makes it rare.
3. Costly to Imitate: A capability that is challenging and expensive for competitors to replicate
provides a more sustainable competitive advantage. For example, while Intel's products
could eventually be imitated, its rapid R&D cycle time capability, which allowed it to bring
products to market ahead of competitors, was much harder to copy.
Q: How does Apple's operating system, iOS, fit into these criteria?
Apple's iOS is valuable, rare, costly to imitate, and non-substitutable. Competitors recognize its
success, but none have been able to replicate Apple’s capabilities, which are also protected by
copyrights.
SWOT analysis is a strategic planning tool that evaluates a business's Strengths, Weaknesses,
Opportunities, and Threats. It helps organizations gain comprehensive awareness of both
internal and external factors that might influence their decision-making.
Q: How does SWOT analysis benefit businesses, why is it important, and when should a
company use it?
The primary objective of SWOT analysis is to help organizations understand all factors, both
internal and external, that might influence their business decisions. This understanding is vital
for exploring new initiatives, revising internal policies, considering growth opportunities, or
even modifying an existing plan.
Companies should employ SWOT analysis before undertaking any significant action and
periodically reassess the business landscape to make necessary operational improvements.
Q: Are there criticisms of SWOT analysis, and how can organizations address its limitations?
Yes, a notable criticism of SWOT analysis is that it doesn't typically account for the competitive
context, meaning it might not always provide a comparative evaluation of strengths,
weaknesses, opportunities, and threats relative to competitors and other external factors.
To address these limitations, organizations should consider their relative competitors and
external factors when using SWOT. While SWOT offers a simple starting point for analysis, it
should be paired with other analytical tools to ensure a more comprehensive view.
Strategic management involves developing competencies that managers can utilize to achieve
better performance and secure a competitive advantage for their organization. It's about
formulating and executing strategies that allow a firm to outperform its rivals.
Jack Welch famously said, “If you don’t have a competitive advantage, don’t compete.”
Sustainability of Q: What determines the sustainability of a firm's competitive advantage and its ability to earn
Competitive profits from it?
Advantage
The sustainability of competitive advantage is determined by four major characteristics of
resources and capabilities:
2. Transferability: This pertains to the ease with which resources and capabilities can be
transferred between companies. If resources and capabilities are easily transferable,
the competitive advantage based on them is less sustainable. This is because rivals can
easily acquire the same resources and capabilities, eroding the firm's advantage.
3. Imitability: This is about how easily competitors can replicate the resources and
capabilities that give a firm its competitive advantage. If these resources and
capabilities cannot be purchased, they must be developed from scratch. The ease and
speed with which competitors can do this determine the sustainability of the
advantage. In some sectors, like financial services, innovations can be easily copied due
to a lack of legal protection. However, complex organizational capabilities that are
deeply embedded in a company's culture can be challenging to imitate.
4. Appropriability: This refers to the ability of a firm's owners to capture the returns from
its resources. It's not just about having a competitive advantage but also ensuring that
the returns from this advantage go to the rightful owners or investors. This ensures that
In essence, for a firm to maintain a sustainable competitive advantage, it must ensure that its
resources and capabilities are durable, non-transferable, hard to imitate, and that the returns
from these resources are appropriately directed back to the firm.
Michael Porter’s Q: Who introduced the concept of generic strategies for competitive advantage and what are
Generic Strategies they?
Michael Porter introduced three generic (because they can be applied by any type or size of
business, including not-for-profit organizations) strategies for gaining competitive advantage:
2. Differentiation - offering unique products and services for consumers who are less
price-sensitive.
They imply different organizational arrangements, control procedures, and incentive systems.
Larger firms might lean towards cost leadership or differentiation due to their resources, while
smaller firms might adopt a focus strategy.
Porter stresses the importance of firms sharing resources and activities to enhance competitive
advantage by reducing costs or increasing differentiation. Additionally, he highlights the need
for firms to transfer skills and expertise among their business units effectively.
Q: What are the cost elements that influence the choice of generic strategies?
A cost leadership strategy may help to remain profitable even with rivalry, new entrants,
suppliers’ power, substitute products, and buyers’ power.
1. Rivalry – Competitors are likely to avoid a price war, since the low-cost firm will continue to
earn profits even after competitors compete away their profits.
2. Buyers – Powerful buyers/customers would not be able to exploit the cost leader firm and
will continue to buy its product.
3. Suppliers – Cost leaders are able to absorb greater price increases from suppliers before they
need to raise prices for customers.
4. Entrants – Low-cost leaders create barriers to market entry through their continuous focus
on efficiency and cost reduction.
5. Substitutes – Low-cost leaders are more likely to lower the costs to induce existing customers
to stay with their products, invest in developing substitutes, and even purchase patents.
2. Cost leadership can succeed only if the firm can achieve higher sales volume.
3. Cost leaders tend to keep their costs low by minimizing cost of advertising, market research,
and research and development, but this approach can prove to be expensive in the long run.
The synergy benefit refers to the advantage gained when different parts of an organization
cooperate and share resources, leading to outcomes that wouldn't be achievable by each part
working independently. This internal strategy of pooling and sharing resources can lead to a
competitive advantage, enhancing both efficiency and effectiveness.
Example: Domino’s Pizza offering home delivery within 30 minutes or the order is free is a
unique selling point that differentiates it from its rivals.
A differentiation strategy should be considered after a thorough analysis of buyers' needs and
preferences. This ensures that the differentiating features align with what customers value and
desire.
2. Pricing: Pricing differentiation is based on fluctuating supply and demand and can also be
influenced by the perceived value of a product to the customer. Companies can either opt to
offer the lowest price or establish superiority through higher pricing. For instance, Apple's
iPhone commands higher prices in the smartphone segment, reflecting its perceived value and
brand positioning.
1. Offer utility to the customers and match products with their tastes and preferences.
6. Fixing product prices based on the unique features of product and buying capacity of the
customer.
A differentiation strategy may help an organisation to remain profitable even with rivalry, new
entrants, suppliers’ power, substitute products, and buyers’ power.
1. Rivalry - Brand loyalty acts as a safeguard against competitors. It means that customers will
be less sensitive to price increases, as long as the firm can satisfy the needs of its customers.
2. Buyers – They do not negotiate for price as they get special features and they have fewer
options in the market.
3. Suppliers – Because differentiators charge a premium price, they can afford to absorb higher
costs of supplies as the customers are willing to pay extra too.
4. Entrants – Innovative features are an expensive offer. So, new entrants generally avoid these
features because it is tough for them to provide the same product with special features at a
comparable price.
5. Substitutes – Substitute products can’t replace differentiated products which have high brand
value and enjoy customer loyalty.
2. Charging too high a price for differentiated features may cause the customer to switch-off to
another alternative. As we see a shift of iPhone users to other android flagship smart phones.
3. Differentiation fails to work if its basis is something that is not valued by the customers. Home
delivery of packed snacks in 30 minutes would not even be a differentiator as the consumer
wouldn’t value such an offer
Focus strategies involve targeting a specific, well-defined segment of the market while ignoring
the broader market. Organizations adopting this strategy aim to serve a narrow market segment
better than competitors who target a more extensive market.
The two main types are focused cost leadership and focused differentiation.
Q: How does focused cost leadership differ from broad cost leadership?
A: While broad cost leadership aims to have the lowest cost across the entire industry, focused
cost leadership narrows its aim to have the lowest cost within a specific niche or segment of the
market.
1. Consumers in the segment have unique preferences or specific requirements that are
different from the broader market.
2. Rival firms are not targeting or specializing in the same narrow segment.
1. Selecting specific niches which are not covered by cost leaders and differentiators.
Advantages include:
2. Due to the tremendous expertise in the goods and services that the organisations following
focus strategy offer, rivals and new entrants may find it difficult to compete.
Disadvantages include:
1. The firms lacking in distinctive competencies may not be able to pursue focus strategy.
2. Due to the limited demand of product/services, costs are high, which can cause problems.
3. In the long run, the niche could disappear or be taken over by larger competitors by acquiring
the same distinctive competencies.
Q: How does the best-cost provider strategy differ from other generic strategies?
Unlike the cost leadership strategy, which focuses solely on achieving the lowest cost, or the
differentiation strategy, which focuses on offering unique features regardless of cost, the best-
cost provider strategy aims to strike a balance between cost and features. It seeks to offer
products or services that are perceived as high-value when considering both cost and quality.
(a) By offering products or services at a lower price than competitors for similar quality and
features.
(b) By charging a similar price as competitors but offering superior quality or additional features.
Q: Can you provide an example of a company that uses a best-cost provider strategy?
Yes, companies like OnePlus, Xiaomi, Oppo, and Vivo in the smartphone industry are good
examples. These companies offer high-quality smartphones with features comparable to
premium brands but at a significantly lower price. They aim to provide consumers with high
value by combining both quality and affordability.
♦ Describe and discriminate between strategic choices such as strategic intensification, strategic
diversification and strategic exits.
♦ Explain the reasons for- relative costs & risks and benefits of the adoption of various types of
corporate strategies.
♦ Describe the circumstances necessitating pursuit of combination strategies and strategic alliances.
Strategic choices allow businesses to enter, remain relevant, and grow in the market. They provide
a direction and framework for decision-making in various market scenarios.
Q: What are the typical strategies an organization might adopt depending on their needs?
Organizations can adopt either a competitive strategy, where they enter a market with numerous
rivals, or a collaborative strategy, involving joint ventures with established companies.
For start-ups, the primary focus is often on penetrating the market, reaching the breakeven stage
quickly, and subsequently pursuing a growth strategy.
For Business conglomerates formulate strategies at different levels: corporate, business unit, and
functional. Big corporates follow an elaborate system of strategy formulation, implementation and
control at different levels in the company to survive and grow in the turbulent business environment.
The primary goal of the stability strategy is to stabilize. This strategy is adopted to safeguard existing
interests and strengths, pursue well-established objectives, maintain operational efficiency
consistently, consolidate achieved positions, and optimize returns on invested resources.
• It continues to serve in the same or similar markets and deals in the same or similar products
and services.
• This strategy is typical for those firms whose product have reached the maturity stage of product
life cycle or those who have a sufficient market share but need to retain that.
Q: How does the stability strategy differ from the 'do nothing' strategy?
A stability strategy actively involves preserving and strengthening the current position in the market,
while a 'do nothing' strategy implies complete inaction and lack of responsiveness to market changes.
Therefore, a stability strategy is proactive in nature.
• A firm opting for stability strategy stays with the same business, same product-market posture
and functions, maintaining same level of effort as at present.
• Stability strategy does not involve a redefinition of the business of the corporation
• While opting for this strategy, the organization can concentrate on its resources and existing
businesses/products and markets, thus leading to building of core competencies.
Q: What are the major reasons a company might choose to adopt a stability strategy?
• A product has reached the maturity stage of the product life cycle.
• The staff feels comfortable with the status quo as it involves less changes and less risks.
• After rapid expansion, a firm might want to stabilize and consolidate itself.
The Growth/Expansion strategy involves redefining the business by significantly broadening its scope
and making substantial investments. This strategy can be associated with traits such as dynamism,
vigor, promise, and success. It often requires a significant reformulation of an organization's goals
and directions.
• Expansion strategy is the opposite of stability strategy. While in stability strategy, rewards are
limited, in expansion strategy they are very high. In the matter of risks, too, the two are the
opposites of each other.
• Expansion strategy leads to business growth. A firm with a mammoth growth ambition can meet
its objective only through the expansion strategy.
• The process of renewal of the firm through fresh investments and new
businesses/products/markets is facilitated only by expansion strategy.
• Expansion strategy is a highly versatile strategy; it offers several permutations and combinations
for growth. A firm opting for the expansion strategy can generate many alternatives within the
strategy by altering its propositions regarding products, markets and functions and pick the one
that suits it most.
• Expansion strategy holds within its fold two major strategy routes: Intensification Diversification.
Both of them are growth strategies; the difference lies in the way in which the firm actually
pursues the growth.
Q: What are the primary reasons a company might choose to adopt a Growth/Expansion Strategy?
• Strategists may feel more satisfied with the prospects of growth from expansion; chief executives
may take pride in presiding over organizations perceived to be growth-oriented.
• Expansion may lead to greater control over the market vis-a-vis competitors.
• Advantages from the experience curve and scale of operations may accrue.
Internal growth strategies leverage a company's own resources and capabilities for expansion,
without resorting to external partnerships or acquisitions. They can be further bifurcated into:
Growth through intensification means a company focuses on internal growth by enhancing its
current operations. This can be achieved through:
1. Market Penetration: Concentrating on selling current products in existing markets. This involves
pushing the same product to the same audience, often by increasing advertising or offering
promotions.
2. Market Development: Introducing current products to new market segments. This might mean
selling in new regions, targeting new customer groups, or using different distribution channels.
3. Product Development: Modifying current products or creating related new products for existing
customers. Instead of finding a new audience, this approach innovates the product itself for the
current audience.
Igor H. Ansoff created a framework that illustrates these intensification strategies for companies.
Growth through diversification means that a company expands by venturing into different products
or sectors. It's a way for a company to use its internal resources to tap into new opportunities and
often promises more growth than just intensifying current operations.
These strategies are primarily internal growth strategies and can be categorized into:
a) Vertically Integrated Diversification: This involves a firm entering businesses related to its
existing operations but at different stages of the production or distribution process. It stays
within the same industry but moves forward or backward in the chain.
2. Forward Integration: A company moves ahead in the value chain and expands into
businesses that use its products. typically towards the customer end. An example is a coffee
bean producer merging with a cafe.
• Solves Complex Problems: Businesses can find opportunities in current societal challenges
through guided innovation, resulting in sustainable solutions tailored to customer needs. For
example, addressing environmental concerns by shifting to renewable energy sources.
• Increases Productivity: By simplifying and often automating tasks, innovation can lead to
improved productivity. Tools like MS Excel, which automates numerous financial tasks,
exemplify such digital innovations that significantly impact productivity across industries.
• Provides Competitive Advantage: Innovating faster than competitors can set a business
apart, giving it a unique edge in the marketplace. Innovative products often need less
marketing since they inherently offer more value to consumers. This not only retains existing
customers but also attracts new ones.
Mergers Or acquisitions (M&A) are strategies used by organizations to expand and grow their
operations. An acquisition or merger with an existing business can be an instantaneous route to
expansion. This approach can be attractive because it bypasses the time, risks, and expertise required
for internally-driven growth.
Merger: This is when two or more companies come together to expand their business operations. In
a merger, the transaction is usually amicable, and both companies come together to share profits in
the newly formed entity. This collaborative approach aims to combine strengths, financial gains, and
overcome trade barriers. In essence, two organizations voluntarily integrate to enhance their
capacities and market presence.
Acquisition: This occurs when one organization takes control of another organization, thereby
assuming authority over all its business operations. Typically, in an acquisition, a financially strong
entity overpowers a weaker one. Acquisitions are more prevalent during economic downturns or
when companies face declining profit margins. The process usually sees the dominant firm
overtaking the weaker one, and the merged entities operate under the name of the more powerful
organization. Acquisitions can sometimes be perceived as unfriendly or forced, especially when the
weaker company is compelled to sell its operations to a more powerful entity.
Q: Why do organizations consider M&A, and what role does synergy play in these decisions?
Organizations often consider M&A proposals systematically to ensure mutual benefits. One of the
driving factors behind these strategies is the potential for synergy between the merging entities.
Synergy can emerge from various aspects like physical facilities, managerial skills, distribution
channels, R&D, and more. A positive synergy implies that the combined resources post-merger or
acquisition produce effects that are greater than the sum of their individual effects before the merger
or acquisition.
Mergers come in various forms, depending on the nature and objective of the combination. Here are
the main types of mergers:
Horizontal Merger: This type of merger involves companies operating in the same industry,
effectively merging with a direct competitor. The primary motive behind such mergers is to realize
economies of scale by eliminating redundant installations and functions, broadening the product
range, reducing working capital and fixed assets investments, eliminating competition, and so on. An
example of a horizontal merger is the formation of Brook Bond Lipton India Ltd. through the union
of Lipton India and Brook Bond.
Vertical Merger: This merger involves two organizations in the same industry but at distinct stages
of the production or distribution system. Vertical mergers aim to achieve increased synergies. When
an organization merges with its raw material supplier, it's termed as backward integration. In
contrast, forward integration refers to when a firm merges with its buyer organizations or
distribution channels. Such mergers allow companies to gain a competitive edge, possibly by limiting
supply of inputs to competitors or by securing inputs at favorable rates. Examples include instances
of backward and forward integration.
Co-generic Merger: In a co-generic merger, the merging firms are related in some manner, be it in
terms of production processes, business markets, or fundamental technologies. This type of merger
allows businesses to diversify around shared resources and strategic needs. An example could be a
company specializing in refrigerators merging with another that deals in kitchen appliances.
Conglomerate Merger: This merger entails the union of companies that are completely unrelated to
each other, with no significant commonalities concerning customer groups, functions, or
technologies. In practice, however, some degree of overlap in these factors might be present even
in a conglomerate merger.
A strategic alliance is a collaboration between two or more businesses to achieve mutual goals.
These businesses remain independent, share the benefits and responsibilities of the alliance, and
often work together especially in the global marketplace.
1. Organizational Benefits:
• Gain new skills and capabilities from partners.
• Enhance productive capacity and supply chain reach.
• Achieve synergy by offering complementary products or services.
• Boost legitimacy and credibility, especially in new ventures, by partnering with respected
entities.
2. Economic Benefits:
• Distribute costs and risks among alliance members.
• Achieve economies of scale leading to reduced unit costs.
• Co-specialize and co-create value; for instance, a computer company bundling its product with a
top-tier monitor brand.
3. Strategic Benefits:
• Collaborate with rivals instead of competing.
• Achieve vertical integration by collaborating along the supply chain.
• Pool resources and skills to create competitive advantages.
• Access new technologies and conduct joint R&D.
4. Political Benefits:
• Navigate entry barriers in foreign markets by partnering with local firms.
• Enhance influence and position by forming alliances with politically influential entities.
Strategic alliances, while offering benefits, also come with drawbacks. The primary disadvantage
revolves around the necessity to share. This involves:
1. Resource and Profit Sharing: Companies in an alliance often have to split profits and pool
resources, which might not always be favorable.
2. Knowledge Sharing Concerns: Sharing skills and knowledge might risk exposing trade secrets.
Even with agreements to protect these secrets, their safety depends on partners'
trustworthiness and the legal system's efficacy.
3. Potential Future Competition: An alliance partner today might become a competitor tomorrow,
especially if they choose to exit the alliance and operate independently using the knowledge
gained.
Strategic Exits Q: What is meant by Strategic Exit?
Strategic Exits refer to the approach an organization takes when it substantially reduces the scope of
its activity. This is done by identifying problem areas, diagnosing the root causes of those problems,
and then taking steps to address them.
Q: How are the problems within an organization identified and addressed through Strategic Exits?
Problems within an organization are identified through thorough analysis and diagnosis. To address
these problems, various retrenchment strategies are considered:
1. Turnaround Strategy: Adopted to reverse a declining trajectory, aiming to revitalize the business
and restore growth and profitability.
2. Divestment or Divestiture Strategy: Involves cutting off loss-making units, divisions, or SBUs,
curtailing product lines, or reducing functions. The aim is to eliminate non-performing elements
and focus on core areas.
3. Liquidation Strategy: Chosen when other strategies do not yield desired outcomes, leading the
organization to completely cease its operations.
Q: What are the danger signals indicating that a company may need a turnaround to survive?
Q: What is the turnaround strategy action plan, its stages, and their objectives for ensuring a
company's recovery and success?
The turnaround strategy action plan focuses on both short and long-term financing needs and
strategic issues and unfolds in five stages:
Stage 1 - Assessment of current problems: This involves identifying the root causes of present issues,
and gauging the damage. Once the problems are identified, directing resources towards areas of
concern.
Stage 2 - Analysis and strategic planning and develop a strategic plan: Before making substantial
changes, the company's chances of survival are determined. This entails examining viable core
businesses, ensuring adequate financing, and studying strengths and weaknesses in competitive
positioning.
Stage 3 - Emergency action implementation: If the organization is in a dire state, a crucial plan is
formulated to stop further decline. Actions encompass debt restructuring, improving working capital,
cost-cutting, refining budgetary practices, pruning product lines, and ensuring adequate funding for
the turnaround.
Stage 4 - Business restructuring: The focus here is on the financial health of the organization's core
operations. Key actions include cash forecasts, asset and debt analysis, and profit reviews.
Repositioning may involve altering the product mix, focusing on neglected core products, or even
exiting certain markets.
Stage 5 - Returning to normal: In this concluding stage, the company should exhibit profitability and
improved ROI. Key strategies include product additions, improved customer service, forming
alliances, and expanding market share. Morale boosting, particularly through reward and
compensation systems, is integral to ensuring employee dedication and a focus on profitability.
In essence, this plan ensures that a struggling company can analyze, react, restructure, and return to
a state of growth and profitability.
• Mismatched Acquisition: If an acquired business does not align well with the company and
cannot be integrated effectively.
• Persistent Negative Cash Flows: When a specific segment of the business continuously drains
financial resources, risking the financial health of the entire company.
• Technological Challenges: When it's unfeasible for a business to undergo the necessary
technological upgrades to stay competitive or relevant, divestment might be the best option.
In essence, divestment serves as a strategic tool for companies to manage their portfolio of
businesses, optimizing for profitability and growth.
• This strategy involves divestment of some of the activities in a given business of the firm or sell-
out of some of the businesses as such.
• Divestment is to be viewed as an integral part of corporate strategy without any stigma attached.
• The management no longer wishes to remain in business either partly or wholly due to
continuous losses and unviability.
• The management feels that business could be made viable by divesting some of the activities or
liquidation of unprofitable activities.
• A business that had been acquired proves to be a mismatch and cannot be integrated within the
company.
• Persistent negative cash flows from a particular business create financial problems for the whole
company, creating the need for divestment of that business.
• Severity of competition and the inability of a firm to cope with it may cause it to divest.
• Technological upgradation is required if the business is to survive but where it is not possible for
the firm to invest in it, a preferable option would be to divest.
• A better alternative may be available for investment, causing a firm to divest a part of its
unprofitable businesses.
Strategic models are tools that assist strategists in evaluating and deciding upon the best courses of
action for individual products or entire business units within a diversified company. These models
are especially valuable for competitive analysis and corporate strategic planning in firms with varied
product lines or multiple business segments. Even less-diversified firms can benefit if they have a
primary business complemented by smaller interests.
1. Market Penetration: Market penetration refers to a growth strategy where the business focuses
on selling existing products into existing markets. The goal is to make more sales to current
customers without significantly altering the products. This could involve increased advertising,
aggressive promotional campaigns, or efforts to boost usage by current customers. For instance,
Gucci introducing new designs for its luxury clothing in European markets exemplifies market
penetration.
2. Market Development: Market development is a growth strategy where the business aims to sell
its existing products in new markets. This can be achieved by entering new geographical
territories, altering product packaging, utilizing different distribution channels, or adopting
distinct pricing strategies to attract a new segment of customers. An example is Gucci selling its
luxury clothing in the Chinese market.
Yes, as market conditions evolve, companies may need to adapt or shift their product-market growth
strategies. When a company's current market becomes saturated, it may need to explore new
markets or employ different strategies for growth.
The ADL matrix, named after Arthur D. Little, is a portfolio analysis technique based on the product
life cycle. The ADL matrix revolves around two primary components:
1. Stage of industry maturity: This represents where the industry stands in its life cycle.
2. Competitive position: This categorizes products or Strategic Business Units (SBUs) based on their
strength in the market.
Q: How are products or SBUs categorized in terms of their competitive position in the ADL matrix?
Dominant: A rare position, often resulting from a monopoly or strong technological leadership.
Strong: A position where the firm has significant freedom in strategy choices without facing major
threats from competitors.
Favourable: Attained when no single competitor dominates the fragmented industry, allowing
market leaders some freedom.
Tenable: Firms here perform satisfactorily but are susceptible to competition from stronger
companies.
Weak: These firms generally underperform, although they still have potential for improvement.
The competitive position provides insights into the firm's standing and strength in the market. It
helps businesses assess their freedom in strategic choices and understand their vulnerability to
competitors.
In the matrix: The vertical axis represents the market growth rate, indicating market attractiveness,
while the horizontal axis represents relative market share, indicating company strength in the
market.
The matrix identifies four types of products or Strategic Business Units (SBUs):
Stars: Stars are high-growth, high-market share products or SBUs. They have strong potential but
require significant investment to maintain their position and finance their growth. They're seen as
prime opportunities for expansion.
Cash Cows: Cash Cows are products or SBUs with low growth but high market share. They produce
strong cash flow with lower costs and require less investment to sustain their market position. Over
time, as growth slows, Stars often evolve into Cash Cows.
Question Marks: Question Marks, also termed problem children or wildcats, are SBUs with low
market share in high-growth markets. They demand substantial investment but offer limited
potential to generate cash. The aim is to transition them into Stars and eventually into Cash Cows as
growth diminishes.
Dogs: Dogs are low-growth, low-share products or SBUs. They might generate just enough revenue
to sustain themselves but don't promise a significant future. Often, the strategy for Dogs is
divestment or liquidation.
Q: After categorizing products or SBUs using the BCG Matrix, what should a firm do next?
Once products or SBUs have been classified, a firm should decide on the future role each will play.
There are four primary strategies:
Build: In the "Build" strategy, the goal is to increase market share, often at the cost of short-term
earnings, to establish a strong future position with a substantial market share.
Hold: The "Hold" strategy aims to maintain the current market share
Harvest: With the "Harvest" strategy, the focus is on maximizing short-term cash flows, even if it
might impact the business negatively in the long run.
Divest: In the "Divest" strategy, the objective is to sell or liquidate the business unit, usually because
the firm believes its resources could be better utilized elsewhere.
The BCG Matrix has been instrumental in aiding strategic planning. However, there are challenges. It
can be complex, time-consuming, and expensive to implement. Defining SBUs, measuring market
share, and gauging growth can be tricky. While it helps classify current businesses, it offers limited
guidance for future planning. Over-reliance on the matrix might lead companies into risky ventures
or cause premature divestment of established units.
In the matrix: The vertical axis represents market attractiveness, while the horizontal axis signifies
the business's strength in the industry.
Q: How is market attractiveness measured in this model?
If a product is in the green zone, it indicates a favorable position, and the strategy could be to expand,
invest, and grow. In the amber or yellow zone, caution is required, and strategic choices need careful
consideration. If a product is in the red zone, it might result in losses, and strategies like
retrenchment, divestment, or liquidation might be appropriate.
Q: How does the GE Matrix differ from the BCG growth-share matrix?
First, it uses market attractiveness, which comprises a broader set of factors, instead of just market
growth.
1. Developing a strategic vision and formulation of statement of mission, goals and objectives.
3. Formulation of strategy.
4. Implementation of strategy.
2. Mission Statement: Managers should articulate the company's core purpose, offering clarity
on its overarching goals and strategies for stakeholders and team members alike.
3. Corporate Goals: These are derived from the mission and represent the growth the company
aims to achieve. They help in shaping the company's approach to achieving that growth.
4. Objective Setting: Objectives turn the broader vision into specific, measurable targets.
Managers should set challenging objectives to drive innovation and urgency across the
organization. These objectives should cascade down to all organizational levels, ensuring
everyone works towards shared outcomes.
1. Environmental Scanning: This examines the external factors like economic conditions, social
trends, technology developments, and market dynamics that affect a company. These factors
are constantly changing and unpredictable, so management must regularly assess them to
identify future opportunities and threats.
2. Organisational Analysis: This looks inward, evaluating a company's financial and technological
resources, production capabilities, marketing effectiveness, R&D, employee skills, etc. The
goal is to identify the company's strengths and weaknesses.
Combining insights from both these analyses results in a SWOT analysis (Strengths, Weaknesses,
Opportunities, and Threats). This can be summarized in a table showcasing the company's internal
strengths and weaknesses against the external opportunities and threats.
2. Analyze and Choose: Deeply examine each option to select the most suitable strategy for the
company.
ii. Growing within the same business by expanding existing units, creating new ones, or acquiring
competitors.
1. Allocate Resources: Ensure budgets direct adequate resources to key strategic activities.
2. Staffing and Organizing: Hire the right skills, focus on strengthening strategic competencies,
and organize workflows effectively.
3. Set Supporting Policies: Establish policies and procedures that help, not hinder, strategy
execution.
4. Adopt Best Practices: Use established best practices in core activities and aim for continuous
improvement.
5. Install Effective Systems: Have systems in place that support employees in their daily strategic
roles.
7. Foster the Right Culture: Cultivate a work environment and company culture that supports
strategy implementation.
8. Provide Leadership: Offer ongoing leadership to keep momentum during execution and
address any challenges promptly.
Successful strategy execution requires ensuring that the strategy aligns with the company's
capabilities, reward structures, operating systems, and overall culture.
This stage focuses on reviewing the company's progress, considering new external factors, and
making necessary changes. It's the checkpoint to decide if the company needs to modify its vision,
objectives, strategy, or execution methods. Key points include:
1. Stay or Pivot: If the company's direction aligns with market conditions and performance goals
are met, it might simply need to refine its existing strategy. Otherwise, a more significant
change might be necessary
2. Address Disruptions: When there are major external changes or the company's performance
drops, it's vital to evaluate if the issues stem from the strategy itself or its execution.
Adjustments should be made based on this evaluation.
3. Regular Re-evaluation: A company should frequently reassess its strategic direction based on
both external and internal factors. Strategies will naturally evolve over time.
4. Continuous Learning: Effective strategy execution involves learning from both successes and
failures. Assessing areas that need improvement and making necessary adjustments is a
continuous process.
In essence, successful strategy management requires regular evaluations and updates to adapt to
changing circumstances and to ensure consistent progress.
1. Strategic Planning: is carried out by senior management and involves assessing the company's
internal strengths and weaknesses, as well as external opportunities and threats and the
formation of corporate strategy. The aim is to allocate resources effectively to reach overall
organizational goals.
2. Operational Planning: Conducted by middle and lower-level management, this focuses on the
detailed utilization of resources to execute the broader strategy.
In essence, while strategic planning outlines the bigger picture, operational planning dives into the
specifics of achieving it.
Strategic planning is carried out by senior management and involves assessing the company's
internal strengths and weaknesses, as well as external opportunities and threats and the formation
of corporate strategy.
• It's about setting the company's goals, figuring out what resources are needed, and
establishing rules for obtaining and using those resources.
• This planning is a result of various decisions that interact and overlap to create the best
strategy for the company.
• It can apply to the entire organization or just a specific part, like a department or division.
Q: What is strategic uncertainty?
Strategic uncertainty refers to the unpredictability of future events and circumstances that can
impact an organization's strategy and goals. This uncertainty can be driven by changes in the
market, technology, competition, regulation, and other external factors.
Q: What are the ways organizations can deal with strategic uncertainty?
1. Flexibility: Organizations should incorporate flexibility into their strategies to adapt swiftly to
environmental changes.
3. Monitoring and Scenario Planning: Regularly monitoring key change indicators and scenario
planning helps organizations foresee potential future impacts.
5. Collaboration and Partnerships: Collaborating with other entities can help in pooling
resources, risk-sharing, and accessing new markets and technologies.
Strategic uncertainty can influence current, proposed, and potential business avenues for an
organization. For instance, a trend toward natural foods might create opportunities for a firm
producing aerated drinks. The effect of strategic uncertainty will vary based on the significance of
the impacted Strategic Business Unit (SBU) to a company. While established SBUs might be
evaluated based on sales, profits, or costs, these metrics may need to be adjusted to account for
potential growth, as current values might not truly reflect future potential.
Before this step, decisions about the strategy should consider if it's achievable and accepted. To
make the strategy work, resources may need to be allocated differently, the organization might
need structural changes, and staff might require training and new systems.
Strategy formulation and strategy implementation are distinct processes, each requiring unique
skills. Formulation is about designing a strategy, while implementation is about executing it. A
company thrives when both the strategy is well-planned and its execution is flawless. It's a mistake
to solely blame the strategic plan for a company's failure, as poor execution can be the main issue.
Therefore, organizational success hinges on both a good strategy and its effective implementation.
The matrix in the figure below represents various combinations of strategy formulation and
implementation:
The figure classifies companies based on the quality of their strategy formulation and
implementation:
1. Square A: Companies with a good strategy but poor implementation. This might be due to
factors like inexperience, lack of resources, or leadership gaps. Their goal is to move to
Square B by improving their implementation.
2. Square B: The ideal spot. Companies here have a well-designed strategy and also excel at
implementing it.
3. Square D: Companies with a weak strategy but strong implementation. They need to first
revise their strategy and then realign their implementation efforts.
4. Square C: The least desirable spot. Companies here have both a flawed strategy and poor
implementation. They must redesign their strategy and improve their implementation
skills.
In essence, business strategy is a planned set of actions to achieve and maintain a competitive
position relative to other businesses, emphasizing the importance of a strong competitive position.
'Strategy' isn't just a 'long-term plan.' It's about a company aiming for a desired future by adjusting
its position based on changing situations. While companies may plan their strategic moves, they
often have to adjust based on competitors' actions.
It’s a management approach in some organizations, when facing challenges, become inward-
focused, prioritizing cost-cutting and letting go of less profitable sectors. This emphasis is on
efficiency (getting the best outputs from inputs in a short term) instead of effectiveness (achieving
organizational goals, like a desired competitive position).
While efficiency is inward and concerns operational managers, effectiveness considers the
organization's relation to its external environment and is primarily the responsibility of top
management.
1. Cell 1: Organizations are thriving, meeting their goals effectively and efficiently.
2. Cell 2 & 4: Organizations are at risk without a clear strategic direction. Being in cell 2 is
even more precarious than cell 3 because cell 3, despite being inefficient, at least has a
strategic direction, ensuring they're on the right path.
In essence, while strategic planning is vital, the real change and success come from putting those
plans into action. And, it's better to act effectively (even if not perfectly) than to merely plan
efficiently.
Difference
between Strategy
Formulation and
Implementation
Note:
While we might study strategy formulation and implementation as separate phases for clarity, in
the real world, they're closely linked and often overlap. There are:
• Backward Linkages: How feedback from the implementation phase can influence and alter
the formulated strategy.
Ultimately, while the foundational principles of strategy might be universally applicable, the real-
world actions derived from those strategies can be diverse, reflecting the unique nature and
demands of different organizational structures and contexts.
1. Forward Linkages: When a strategy is formulated, it sets the direction for the organization.
This often requires changes within the organization, such as altering its structure or
leadership style. So, the act of creating a strategy directly influences how it will be
implemented.
2. Backward Linkages: The process of formulating a strategy isn't just influenced by new ideas
but also by how past strategies were implemented. Organizations tend to choose strategies
they believe they can execute based on their current resources and capabilities. Over time,
these incremental adjustments guide the organization from its current state to its desired
future state. So, feedback from the implementation phase can influence and alter the
formulated strategy.
1. Strategic Plans: While strategies outline the organization's intentions, they don't result in
action by themselves. They need to be activated through proper implementation.
3. Projects: Programmes further break down into projects. Projects are specific plans with a set
budget, predetermined timelines, and clear objectives. For instance, a research programme
may consist of multiple projects, each targeting a specific goal, having its budget, and a
completion deadline.
Implementing strategies goes beyond just making plans or projects. It demands resources, proper
organizational structure, suitable systems, specific functional policies, and appropriate behavior.
5. Functional Implementation: Ensuring each function (e.g., marketing, finance) aligns with the
strategy.
These activities don't necessarily follow a strict sequence. Some may overlap or recur over time,
while others might only happen once.
Q: How can an organization effectively transition from the strategy formulation stage to the
implementation stage?
Transitioning from strategy formulation to its implementation involves shifting responsibility from
top strategists to divisional and functional managers. This shift can create issues, especially if these
managers are caught off-guard by strategic decisions.
Hence:
• Involvement: It's essential that lower-level managers are involved in formulating strategy and
that strategists are engaged in implementation.
• Key Managerial Tasks: Include setting annual goals, crafting policies, resource allocation,
revising structures and incentives, managing resistance to change, nurturing a strategy-
supportive culture, and making necessary human resource adjustments.
• Training: Employees at all levels need training to ensure they possess and maintain skills to be
top performers.
effectiveness.
Limitations:
• External Environment Overlooked: The model mainly focuses on internal organizational
elements, largely ignoring external factors that can impact a company.
• Static Nature: Critics argue the model is more static than dynamic, making it potentially less
adaptable or flexible for real-time decision-making.
• Conceptual-Execution Gap: Some believe the model doesn't bridge the gap between strategy
conceptualization and its execution effectively.
In summary, while the McKinsey 7S Model provides a comprehensive framework for evaluating
the internal dynamics of an organization, it's essential to consider its limitations, especially when
used as the sole tool for organizational analysis.
Organization Changes in a company's strategy often lead to changes in its structure for two main reasons:
Structure
1. The structure determines how goals and guidelines are set based on the strategy. For
instance, a company organized by location will have location-based goals, while one
organized by product will focus on product-specific objectives.
2. The structure dictates where resources go. If a company is organized around customer
types, resources are divided based on those groups. If it's organized by function, resources
are assigned to specific functions.
Chandler stated that when a company's strategy changes, its structure should also change. The
structure needs to support the strategy for the company to succeed. While there's no one-size-
fits-all structure, successful companies in the same industry often have similar setups. For
instance:
While changing the structure can help implement a strategy, it can't fix a poor strategy or bad
management. The structure itself can also impact the choice of strategy. For instance, a strategy
that needs drastic structural changes may not be preferred.
The key is to determine the structural adjustments necessary for new strategies. There are several
basic organizational structures to consider:
1. Functional
2. Divisional by geographic area
3. Divisional by product
4. Divisional by customer
5. Divisional process
6. Strategic Business Unit (SBU)
7. Matrix
Every company requires an organizational structure to execute and oversee its strategies. As firms
devise new strategies, grow, or diversify, they may need to adapt or change their structural
framework.
Q: What role does the organizational structure play within a company and what are the different
types of Org Structure?
The organizational structure acts as a framework that guides how tasks are completed and
decisions are made within the company. It reflects the managers' determination of the company's
activities and how they align with the chosen strategy.
Simple Structure
• Suited for companies with a single-business strategy, offering products in one geographic area.
• Also fits companies with focused cost leadership or differentiation strategies.
• In this setup, the owner-manager decides and oversees everything. The staff carries out tasks
as directed.
Characteristics:
• Minimal task specialization
• Few rules and little formalization
• Basic information systems
• Direct involvement of the owner-manager in day-to-day operations
Advantages:
• Regular, direct communication
• Quick product market introduction, potentially offering a competitive edge.
• Fewer coordination issues compared to larger organizations.
• Openness to innovation
• Structural flexibility
• Swift response to environmental changes.
Potential Drawbacks:
However, if these smaller companies succeed and grow, they can outgrow the simple structure.
More relevant competitive information can overwhelm the owner-managers, leading to
inefficiencies.
Companies eventually need to transition from a simple structure to a functional one, especially as
they grow larger or when they diversify minimally. This functional structure is better equipped to
handle more complicated organizational functions.
Functional Structure
The functional structure is a common organizational model in businesses due to its simplicity and
cost-effectiveness.
Characteristics:
• Tasks are grouped by business function, such as marketing, finance, production, R&D, and
more.
• Led by a CEO or managing director, supported by corporate staff and managers heading each
function like production, marketing, finance, etc.
• Promotes labor specialization, leading to enhanced efficiency.
• Simplifies the control system and supports faster decision-making.
Advantages:
• Overcomes the growth limitations found in the simple structure.
• Aids in communication and coordination between different departments.
Potential Drawbacks:
• Functional specializations can lead to communication barriers between departments.
• The CEO has to ensure all functions align with the business's broader objectives.
• Professionals within a function might become too focused on their specific roles, potentially
losing sight of the company's broader mission and vision.
When such drawbacks become prominent, companies may transition to a multidivisional structure
to alleviate the challenges of the functional structure.
Divisional Structure
As companies grow and diversify, managing various products and services across different markets
becomes a challenge. To address this, many adopt a divisional structure, which can be based on
various criteria:
1. Geographic Area: Tailors strategies to regional customer needs and characteristics. Enhances
local decision-making and coordination.
2. Product/Service: Ideal for businesses offering a few distinct products or services. Focuses
attention on product lines.
3. Customer: Best for companies where specific customer groups are pivotal. It caters to distinct
customer requirements. For instance, some airlines and banks are organized by customer
groups.
4. Process: Similar to functional structures but with profit or revenue accountability. Organized
based on workflow.
Characteristics:
• Functional activities happen both centrally and in each division.
• Clear accountability: Divisional managers oversee sales and profit.
• Promotes delegation of authority.
Advantages:
• Clear performance outcomes enhance employee morale.
• Provides career growth opportunities for managers.
• Allows local control, fostering adaptability.
• Encourages healthy internal competition.
• Facilitates addition of new businesses or products.
Potential Drawbacks:
• Expensive due to:
• Requirement of functional specialists in each division.
• Duplication of resources and roles.
• Higher salaries for qualified managers.
• Need for a complex control system at the headquarters.
• Difficulty in maintaining consistent practices across the company.
Despite its potential limitations, for many large and even smaller organizations, the divisional
structure's benefits outweigh the drawbacks. The structure's type is determined by factors like the
company’s products, services, markets, and strategic focus. For instance, General Motors and
Procter & Gamble use product-based divisional structures, while some banks and airlines use
customer-based divisions.
Multidivisional (M-form) Structure
The M-form structure evolved in the 1920s as large corporations grappled with coordination and
control issues inherent to expanding product lines and markets. Under previous functional
structures, departments often struggled to manage multiple products, leading to inefficiencies and
suboptimal resource allocations. This structure aims to alleviate these challenges.
Characteristics:
• Separate Divisions: Each division operates as its distinct business entity with its own functional
departments (e.g., marketing, finance, operations).
• Performance Monitoring: The structure facilitates a clear view of each division's performance,
aiding in better resource allocation and fostering healthy competition.
• Strategic Controls: When the firm has fewer divisions or is less diversified, the
corporate office exercises strategic controls, implying a deep understanding of each
division's business strategy.
• Financial Controls: As diversification increases, it becomes challenging for the
corporate office to intimately understand every division. Instead, the focus shifts to
financial metrics like cash flow, revenue, and profits.
Advantages:
• Focused Accountability: Divisions can be held accountable for their financial performance.
• Flexibility: Allows companies to adapt to varying market conditions in different business units.
• Resource Allocation: Facilitates optimal resource distribution based on the performance and
potential of each division.
• Stimulates Improvement: Underperforming divisions have clear metrics to guide their
improvement efforts
Potential Drawbacks:
• Potential for Duplication: Multiple divisions may have overlapping roles and resources, leading
to inefficiencies.
• Interdivisional Competition: Divisions might compete for the same corporate resources or
market segments.
• Complexity: Managing multiple divisions can be intricate, especially when they operate in
vastly different industries or markets.
As firms grow even larger and more diversified, the very nature of their divisions might change.
Divisions might not just be separate business entities but could evolve into Strategic Business Units
(SBUs). SBUs are more than just divisions; they represent standalone businesses with their
strategies, resources, and competitive dynamics. They are typically based on market
segmentation, and their performance is often interdependent.
An SBU is a clustering of related businesses within a multi-business enterprise. The main goal of
creating SBUs is to facilitate more efficient and effective strategic planning by grouping related
products or services together, simplifying management, and assigning resources more optimally.
Characteristics:
• Independence: Each SBU operates as a separate business or a collection of related businesses.
This autonomy enables focused strategic planning and accountability.
• Unique Competitors: Each SBU faces its distinct competitive landscape.
• Leadership Structure: An SBU has a manager responsible for strategic planning, profit
performance, and managing factors affecting profits.
Advantages:
• Enhanced Strategic Planning: Grouping similar products or services into SBUs ensures that
strategic planning is coherent and aligned.
• Facilitates Coordination: Encourages synergies among related divisions or products, enhancing
the overall performance.
• Clarified Accountability: Each SBU's performance can be distinctly assessed, leading to clear
responsibility.
• Adaptability: Individual SBUs can quickly respond to environmental changes or market shifts.
• Focused Resource Allocation: Resources are channeled efficiently based on each SBU's
performance and needs.
Practical Implications: Historically, businesses were organized territorially. This method posed
challenges as products received varied strategic attention across territories, and unrelated
products often got identical treatments. The SBU structure offers a solution, ensuring that related
products receive consistent strategic attention.
Example: Sony restructured its operations to fit the SBU model, grouping products that benefited
from shared software and content. This integration aimed to enhance profitability by leveraging
synergies across products.
SBU Identification:
• Functional Standpoint: Products that are related in function are grouped under an SBU.
• Avoiding Unrelated Products: Unrelated products within an SBU are isolated and, if possible,
assigned to other SBUs based on functional relations.
• Strategic Differentiation: Each SBU will have its distinct mission, objectives, competition, and
strategy.
The concept of SBUs is pivotal for multi-business corporations, offering a streamlined approach to
manage varied portfolios. By focusing on functional relationships and ensuring each unit has a
clear strategic direction, corporations can more effectively allocate resources and foster growth.
Matrix Structure
The matrix structure is a unique organizational design that attempts to balance the benefits of two
other prominent structures: the functional structure (based on departments or functions) and the
divisional structure (based on products, services, or markets).
Characteristics
• Dual Reporting: In this structure, an employee typically reports to two superiors: a functional
manager and a product or project manager.
• Complexity: Due to dual reporting, there's a violation of the "unity of command" principle,
which can lead to potential conflicts and confusion.
• Communication: The structure relies on both vertical (hierarchical) and horizontal (across
functions or products) flows of authority and communication.
• Higher Overhead: There's often increased management overhead, as the structure requires
more managerial roles to facilitate coordination.
Where is it Used? The matrix structure is prevalent in sectors like construction, healthcare,
research, and defense. It's particularly favored when:
• The external environment is volatile, especially in technological and market contexts.
• There's a need for cross-fertilization of ideas across various projects or products.
• Resources are scarce.
• There's a pressing need to enhance decision-making and information processing
capabilities.
Advantages:
• Flexibility & Stability: Combines the adaptability of the product form with the steadiness of the
functional structure.
• Clear Objectives: Project goals are clearly delineated.
• Efficient Resource Utilization: Especially when resources are scarce.
• Improved Communication: Facilitates multiple communication channels.
• Visible Results: Workers can directly see the outcomes of their efforts.
Potential Drawbacks:
Conflict: The dual authority can lead to power struggles between functional and product
managers.
Complexity: It's challenging to manage and may require extensive training and communication
systems.
Ambiguity: There might be confusion over roles, responsibilities, and resource allocation.
• Cross-functional Task Forces: Used temporarily for new product lines with a project manager
as the primary link.
• Product/Brand Management: Semi-permanent setup where function remains the primary
structure, but product managers act as integrators.
• Mature Matrix: A full-fledged matrix setup with permanent functional and product structures,
requiring extensive collaboration between managers.
Despite its advantages, the matrix structure is often criticized for its operational complexities and
challenges in implementation. However, for organizations operating in dynamic environments or
those pursuing diversified strategies, the matrix can be an effective structural choice.
Network Structure
The network structure is a revolutionary organizational design that can be seen as a "non-
structure" due to its significant outsourcing of in-house business functions. It diverges from
traditional hierarchical organizational structures and instead operates as a web of connections and
collaborations, making it aptly termed as a virtual organization.
Characteristics
• Outsourcing: Many traditional in-house activities are outsourced to external partners.
• Virtual Organization: Instead of a traditional hierarchy, the organization is a series of project
collaborations interconnected in a non-hierarchical manner.
• Unstable Environments: This structure is suitable for firms in unpredictable environments that
require innovation and a rapid response.
• Contracts Over Employees: Instead of hiring long-term employees, organizations might
contract with individuals for specific projects or durations.
• Geographical Dispersion: The organization's functions might be spread across different
locations, with a small centralized hub acting as a connector or "broker."
• Emphasis on Core Competencies: The organization focuses on its unique strengths while
harnessing the efficiencies of partners who specialize in their areas of expertise.
Examples: A company like Airtel, for instance, leverages the network structure by outsourcing
manufacturing to low-cost producers.
Advantages:
• Flexibility and Adaptability: Can easily adapt to rapid technological changes and shifting
international trade patterns.
• Efficiency: By partnering with specialized firms, a company can harness their expertise without
having to develop it in-house.
• Focus on Core Competencies: Allows organizations to concentrate on what they do best.
Potential Drawbacks:
• Over-reliance on Partners: With so many potential collaborators, it might be challenging to
manage and maintain quality across the network.
• Missed Synergies: By outsourcing various functions, organizations might miss out on potential
efficiencies that arise from integrating multiple activities.
• Risk of Overspecialization: If a firm narrows down too much on a few specific functions, it
might become non-competitive if those functions become obsolete or less critical.
Implications for Employees: The shift towards newer organizational structures like the network
structure brings about several implications for employees:
• Continuous Learning: Employees are expected to be proactive and continually update their
skills.
• Increased Interaction: Flatter structures might require more intensive interactions with both
internal and external stakeholders.
• Potential Stress: The demands of such structures, combined with the need for continuous
learning and increased interaction, might be overwhelming for some employees.
Hourglass Structure
The Hourglass Structure has emerged as a direct result of advancements in information technology
and communications. As technology continues to automate and streamline tasks, the role of
middle management has been redefined and, in many cases, diminished.
Characteristics
• Three Layers: The structure consists of a top layer (senior management), a constricted middle
layer (middle management), and a broad bottom layer (front-line employees and workers).
• Reduced Middle Management: The middle layer is slim and contains fewer managers than
traditional organizational structures.
• Role of Technology: Advanced information technology systems connect the top and bottom
layers, automating many tasks that were traditionally handled by middle management.
• Generalists over Specialists: Unlike traditional middle managers who might specialize in
specific areas like marketing, finance, or production, managers in the hourglass structure
handle a variety of cross-functional issues, making them more of generalists.
Advantages:
• Cost Reduction: With fewer middle managers, there's an obvious benefit in reduced personnel
costs.
• Increased Responsiveness: A slimmed-down middle layer can lead to quicker decision-making
as there are fewer layers to navigate.
• Decentralized Decision Making: By removing some middle management, decisions can be
made closer to where the actual work happens, which can lead to more informed and efficient
choices.
Potential Drawbacks:
• Limited Promotion Opportunities: With a reduced middle layer, there's less room for upward
mobility for those at the bottom, potentially leading to dissatisfaction.
• Risk of Monotony: Employees might face stagnation in their roles due to limited growth
opportunities, leading to monotony and reduced motivation.
• Maintaining Morale: With reduced promotional paths, organizations need to find alternative
ways to motivate and reward their employees, such as offering challenging tasks or lateral
transfers.
These sociological elements, some subtle, collectively form an organization's culture. The origin
can be anywhere: a single influential person, a department, or from any level in the organizational
hierarchy. Often, stories that are repeatedly told to new members reinforce the company's values
and ways of operating.
An organization's culture can either help or hinder its strategy execution. If the culture aligns with
the company's goals and approach, it aids in implementing the strategy. while a conflicting culture
can become a stumbling block to a successful execution.
Strong organizational culture directly impacts the execution of a company's strategy. If the culture
aligns with the strategy, it boosts the chances of successful execution.
For instance:
• A culture that values thrift supports a low-cost strategy.
• A culture that encourages creativity aligns with a strategy focused on innovation.
• A culture that emphasizes customer focus and empowers employees matches a strategy
of offering superior customer value.
When culture complements the strategy, it sets informal rules and influences the behavior of
employees. Such alignment positively impacts the energy, collaboration, and customer treatment
within the organization.
A strategy-supportive culture motivates employees, aligns them with the company's vision and
goals, and fosters collaboration. This creates an environment where employees feel connected to
the company's mission, making them more enthusiastic and competent in their roles.
If a company's culture doesn't align with its strategy, it often needs to change the culture quickly.
While sometimes the strategy might need adjustment to fit the culture, it's more common to
modify the culture to support the strategy. The deeper the misalignment between culture and
strategy, the harder it is to implement the strategy effectively. A prolonged mismatch can
undermine efforts to execute the strategy successfully.
Q: Whose responsibility is it to choose a strategy that aligns with the core aspects of a corporate
culture, and who addresses any cultural aspects that hinder strategy execution?
The strategy maker is responsible for selecting a strategy that matches the unchangeable parts of
the existing corporate culture. Once a strategy is chosen, it's up to the strategy implementer to
adjust any cultural facets that obstruct its effective execution.
Modifying a company's culture to match its strategy is one of the hardest tasks for management.
The deep-rooted values and habits make people resistant to change. It requires persistent
management efforts over time to transition from a problematic culture to one that supports the
strategy effectively.
Q: What are the essential steps to modify a corporate culture so that it aligns with the chosen
strategy?
1. Diagnosis: Identify parts of the current culture that either support or hinder the strategy.
2. Communication: Engage in open discussions with stakeholders about necessary cultural
changes.
4. Leadership Commitment: The CEO must be genuinely dedicated to the change, emphasizing
the new culture consistently.
6. Grassroots Support: Engage frontline supervisors and influential employees, highlighting the
importance of adhering to and promoting the new cultural norms.
7. Time Perspective: Cultural change is a long-term process. Depending on the organization's size
and the extent of change needed, it can take anywhere from two to five years. Establishing a
strategy-supportive culture in a new organization is often simpler than changing a deeply
rooted, non-supportive culture in an existing one.
While a strict emphasis on rigid management can lead to steady, linear progress, focusing on the
more flexible aspects can boost performance at a much faster rate. Ideally, organizations should
strike a balance between these two approaches. This is because, in our dynamic world, what seems
appropriate when established might not fit the evolving reality during implementation.
Strategic leadership involves guiding a company's direction through vision, strategy development,
and implementation. A strategic leader wears many hats, including being a visionary, strategist,
administrator, culture advocate, and resource manager. Depending on the situation, they may
need to be authoritative, a good listener, participative, or even act as a coach and adviser.
A strategic leader acts as a catalyst for change, ensuring effective implementation of strategic
alterations within an organization. To lead change, they first assess the situation and then
determine the best approach. Managers championing strategy execution typically embrace five
leadership roles:
1. Staying on top of what is happening, closely monitoring progress, solving out issues, and
learning what obstacles lie in the path of good execution.
2. Promoting a culture of esprit de corps that mobilizes and energizes organizational members
to execute strategy in a competent fashion and perform at a high level.
3. Keeping the organization responsive to changing conditions, alert for new opportunities,
bubbling with innovative ideas, and ahead of rivals in developing competitively valuable
competencies and capabilities.
4. Exercising ethical leadership and insisting that the company conduct its affairs like a model
corporate citizen.
5. Pushing corrective actions to improve strategy execution and overall strategic performance.
Example:
N. R. Narayan Murthy, the former CEO of Infosys, is renowned for the values he embedded within
the company. His lasting legacy at Infosys includes a robust management development program
that nurtures leadership with ethical foundations.
Similarly, Dhirubhai Ambani, the founder of Reliance Group, was distinguished for his visionary
strategies and his knack for achieving corporate objectives. His clear company direction and
exceptional people skills motivated employees to work towards the company's strategic goals,
marking him as a standout strategic leader in the business arena.
Strategic leaders guide the company in developing and achieving its strategic intent, mission, and
goals. They effectively navigate the strategic management process, from planning to execution,
ensuring everyone works towards achieving strategic objectives.
Q: What does strategic leadership entail?
In the modern competitive arena, strategic leaders must frequently adjust their perspectives to
address rapid and intricate changes. Their understanding or "frame of reference" about their
company, industry, and core competencies plays a pivotal role in this.
A manager's frame of reference shapes their understanding and mindset towards their company
and industry. Since competitive battles are essentially clashes between different managerial
mindsets, an effective strategic leader must be adept at navigating diverse and complex
competitive situations characteristic of the present-day landscape.
The strategic leadership skills of a company’s managers serve as vital resources that influence
company performance. Developing these skills is crucial for the future success and benefit of the
company.
Q: How does strategic leadership differ from managerial leadership?
While strategic leadership focuses on setting the firm’s direction, developing a future vision, and
inspiring members to follow that direction, managerial leadership is more about the short-term
and deals with day-to-day activities.
The two primary approaches are transformational leadership style and transactional leadership
style.
• Transformational leaders use charisma and enthusiasm to inspire and motivate people for the
organization's benefit.
• It's most suitable for turbulent environments, industries at the beginning or end of their life-
cycles, or underperforming organizations that require major changes.
• Transformational leaders offer excitement, vision, intellectual stimulation, and personal
satisfaction, presenting followers with a vision of a greater purpose.
• They inspire followers to exceed their initial expectations by enhancing their abilities and
boosting their self-confidence. They also foster innovation throughout the organization.
Controlling is vital in management as it ensures that planned activities are performed and
predetermined goals are met. It regulates, checks, and conditions behaviors to align with set
norms and standards, ensures proper use of resources, safeguards assets, and ensures the
realization of what is planned.
It involves:
• Monitoring activities.
• Measuring results against predefined standards.
• Analysing and rectifying deviations.
• Adapting and maintaining the system for continuous organizational learning and capability
enhancement.
Given the potential gap between strategy formulation and its execution, strategies can be
impacted by internal and external changes. Thus, there's a need for systems that monitor
strategies during implementation. Strategic control evaluates a strategy during its formulation and
implementation, identifying potential issues and changes, and making necessary adjustments. It
aims to ensure that the strategy remains relevant and effective in changing environments.
1. Premise Control: Premise Control ensures that the assumptions or premises on which a
strategy is based remain valid over time. It continuously monitors the environment to check
the validity of these premises, focusing on both environmental factors (like economic
conditions and technology) and industry factors (like competitors and suppliers). The aim is to
prioritize and control those premises most subject to change and which have a significant
impact on the organization and its strategy.
2. Strategic Surveillance: Unlike the focused approach of Premise Control, Strategic Surveillance
is broad and unfocused. It involves a general monitoring of various sources of information to
identify unanticipated information relevant to the organization's strategy. This can be
achieved by reading newspapers, attending conferences, and other similar activities. It may be
an informal control, but it's vital for uncovering important strategic information.
3. Special Alert Control: Special Alert Control is activated by sudden, unexpected events that
could have a major impact on an organization's strategy, such as sudden governmental
changes, natural disasters, or major moves by competitors. Organizations usually have crisis
management teams ready to handle such scenarios, ensuring a swift strategic response
4. Implementation Control: While both involve the actual execution phase, Implementation
Control focuses on assessing the need for changes in the overall strategy based on the results
of specific actions taken during implementation. It continuously checks if the strategy is
moving in the desired direction.
Q: What is the relationship between Milestone Reviews and the overall strategy?
Milestone Reviews are crucial checkpoints. They break down the strategy implementation into key
activities based on time, events, or major resource allocation. These reviews help in assessing the
need to maintain or adjust the strategic direction of an organization. They provide an opportunity
for a comprehensive reassessment of the strategy's efficacy.
These are key indicators that organizations employ to monitor the effectiveness of their strategies.
They offer a snapshot of an organization's performance and help leaders ascertain alignment with
goals and make necessary improvements
SPM eliminates departmental silos by setting up a common language, allowing all units of the
organization to communicate openly and efficiently.
Q: Why are the creation and selection of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) important?
KPIs are crucial to ensuring strategy implementation results in tangible outcomes. They provide
clear links between actions and strategic outcomes. But, it's essential to choose KPIs wisely, as
they significantly influence organizational behavior.
Q: What considerations should be made while selecting KPIs?
Q: What are the two primary forces affecting people in the strategy planning process?
2. Political forces which focus on preserving territories, promoting internal rivalry, and encourage
knowledge retention and selective communication.
When there's a conflict between these forces, the result can be a division in strategy. The aspects
that are politically acceptable get communicated openly, forming the explicit strategy. Meanwhile,
the more sensitive or controversial aspects may remain unspoken, becoming the implicit strategy.
Financial Measures: Financial measures, such as revenue growth, return on investment (ROI), and
profit margins, provide an understanding of the organization's financial performance and its ability
to generate profit.
Market Measures: Market measures, such as market share, customer acquisition, and customer
referrals, provide information about the organization's competitiveness in the marketplace and its
ability to attract and retain customers.
Employee Measures: Employee measures, such as employee satisfaction, turnover rate, and
employee engagement, provide insight into the organization's ability to attract and retain talented
employees and create a positive work environment.
Innovation Measures: Innovation measures, such as research and development (R&D) spending,
patent applications, and new product launches, provide insight into the organization's ability to
innovate and create new products and services that meet customer needs.
Strategic performance measures are essential for organizations for several reasons:
Goal Alignment: Strategic performance measures help organizations align their strategies with
their goals and objectives, ensuring that they are on track to achieve their desired outcomes.
Resource Allocation: Strategic performance measures provide organizations with the information
they need to make informed decisions about resource allocation, enabling them to prioritize their
efforts and allocate resources to the areas that will have the greatest impact on their performance.
Q: How can organizations select the most suitable strategic performance measures?
For organizations to effectively monitor their strategic progress, it's vital to choose the right
performance measures. Here are key factors organizations should take into account:
Relevance: The measure should be relevant to the organization's goals and objectives and provide
information that is actionable and meaningful.
Data Availability: The measure should be based on data that is readily available and can be
collected and analyzed in a timely manner.
Data Quality: The measure should be based on high-quality data that is accurate and reliable.
Data Timeliness: The measure should be based on data that is current and up-to-date, enabling
organizations to make informed decisions in a timely manner.
In essence, strategic performance measures act as a yardstick, helping organizations gauge the
efficacy of their strategies, pinpoint areas needing attention, and make informed decisions about
resource allocation and strategic adjustments. For these measures to be effective, they should be
clear, significant, and straightforward. Periodic reviews and updates are also essential to ensure
that these metrics remain congruent with the evolving goals and objectives of the organization.
Strategic Change Recognize the need for change: The first step involves diagnosing which aspects of the current
Through Digital corporate culture are strategy-supportive and which are not. This involves environmental
Transformation scanning and possibly a SWOT analysis to identify gaps and areas for change.
Create a shared vision to manage change: Objectives for both the organization and its members
must align, avoiding any conflict. Senior managers must consistently communicate this vision and
demonstrate their commitment to the new strategic initiatives.
Institutionalise the change: This action stage requires implementing the new strategy. A new
culture that supports change must be created and maintained, and the process should be
regularly monitored for adjustments as needed.
Q: Explain Kurt Lewin’s Model of Change?
To make the change lasting, Kurt Lewin proposed three phases model for effective organizational
change, consisting of 'unfreezing,' 'changing,' and 'refreezing.'
Unfreezing the situation: The 'unfreezing' phase is the first step in preparing an organization for
change. It involves making employees aware that change is necessary. The goal is to avoid
surprising employees with sudden changes, as that can be harmful to morale. Unfreezing is the
process of breaking down the old attitudes and behaviours,customs and traditions so that they
start with a clean slate. by communicating the upcoming changes through announcements and
meetings. This helps prepare everyone to be more open and ready for the new changes.
Changing to the new situation: The 'changing' phase comes after 'unfreezing' and is the stage
where organizational members are prepared to accept new ways of doing things. Their behavior
patterns are redefined through one of three methods proposed by H.C. Kellman:
• Compliance: This involves using a reward and punishment system to encourage desired
behaviors. People change because they want to avoid punishment or receive rewards.
• Identification: In this approach, members are encouraged to identify with role models in
the organization whose behaviors they'd like to emulate.
Refreezing: The 'refreezing' phase is the final stage where the new behavior becomes the
standard practice within the organization. For the change to be successful and lasting, this new
behavior must fully replace the old one. Continuous reinforcement is crucial to ensure that the
new behavior remains permanent and doesn't revert back to old ways.
Importantly, Lewin's model acknowledges that change is not a one-off event but a continuous
cycle. The environment is ever-changing, and organizations must regularly go through the cycle
of 'unfreezing,' 'changing,' and 'refreezing' to adapt and thrive. This makes 'refreezing' not a final
endpoint but part of an ongoing process of change management.
Q: How does digital transformation work in organizations and what role does change
management play in it?
Change management is crucial in this context. It helps organizations plan, prepare, and execute
changes, including digital transformations. When done correctly, change management helps a
business navigate the challenges of digital transition and fully capitalize on their investment.
1. Defining Goals and Objectives: The first step is to outline what the organization aims to
achieve with the digital transformation.
2. Assessing Current State and Identifying Gaps: Organizations need to evaluate their existing
operations to pinpoint areas that require change.
3. Creating a Roadmap for Change: This involves planning the specific steps that need to be
taken to move from the current state to the desired state.
4. Implementing and Managing the Change: This entails putting the plan into action and
managing the change across all levels of the organization.
Each of these elements is critical for a successful digital transformation. However, the key to
success lies in how these elements collaborate to help the organization reach its goals.
Change management is a process or set of tools and best practices used to manage changes in an
organization. It assists in making changes in a safe and regulated manner, reducing the possibility
of detrimental effects on the company. Any sort of organisation, including enterprises,
organisations, governmental bodies, and even families, can utilise change management to
manage changes. Change management models and methods come in a wide variety, but they all
havekey things in common. These include creating a clear vision for the change, involving
stakeholders in the process, coming up with a plan for putting the change into action, and
keeping an eye on the results.
The five best practices for managing change in small and medium-sized businesses are:
1. Begin at the top: A focused, invested, united leadership that is on the same page about the
company's future is reflected in change that begins at the top. The culture that will motivate the
rest of the organisation to accept change can only be generated and promoted in this way.
2. Ensure that the change is both necessary and desired: The fact that decision-makers are
unaware of how to properly handle a digital transformation and the effects it will have on their
firm is one of the main causes of this. If a corporation doesn’t have a sound strategy in place,
introducing too much too fast can frequently become a major issue down the road.
3. Reduce disruption: Employee perceptions of what is required or desirable change can differ
by department, rank, or performance history. It's crucial to lessen how changes affect staff. The
introduction of new tactics or technologies intended to improve management and corporate
operations causes employee concern about change. It is possible to reduce workplace
disruption by:
a. Getting the word out early and preparing for some interruption.
b. Giving staff members the knowledge and tools, they need to adjust to
change.
c. Creating an environment that encourages transformation or change.
d. Empowering change agents to provide context and clarity for changes,
such as project managers or team leaders.
e. Ensuring that IT department is informed of changes in technology or
infrastructure and is prepared to support them.
4. Encourage communication: Create channels so that workers may contact you with queries or
complaints. Encourage departmental collaboration to propagate ideas and innovations as new
procedures take root. Communication promotes efficiency and has the power to influence
culture, just like your vision. The people who will be affected the most by these changes are
reassured that they are not in danger through effective communication, which keeps everyone
on the same page.
5. Recognize that change is the norm, not the exception: Change readiness may be defined as
“the ability to continuously initiate and respond to change in ways that create advantage,
minimize risk, and sustain performance.” In order to keep up with the customers, businesses
must also adapt their operations. They must prepare for change in advance and expect them. It
may run into difficulties because change is not a project but rather an ongoing process.
Any organisation may find the work of digital transformation challenging and verwhelming. To
ensure that a digital transition is effective, change management is essential. Here are some
pointers for navigating change during the digital transformation:
1. Specify the digital transformation’s aims and objectives: What is the intended outcome?
What are the precise objectives that must be accomplished? It will be easier to make sure that
everyone is on the same page and pursuing the same aims if everyone has a clear grasp of the
goals.
2. Always, always, always communicate: It might be challenging for people to accept change
and adjust to it. Ensure that you routinely and honestly discuss the objectives of the digital
transformation and how they will affect stakeholders, including employees, clients, and other
parties.
3. Be ready for resistance: Even when a change is for the better, it can be challenging for people
to embrace it. Have a strategy in place for dealing with any resistance that may arise.
4. Implement changes gradually: Changes should ideally be implemented gradually rather than
all at once. In order to avoid overwhelming individuals with too much change at once, this will
give people time to become used to the new way of doing things.
5. Offer assistance and training: Workers will need guidance in the new procedures, software
applications, etc
Think Commerce? Think ArivuPro!
+91-9686665253
www.arivupro.com