Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 149 views

    BC230418158 Psy611

    Uploaded by

    rhanzla1220
    The document discusses five scenarios involving psychologists violating ethical standards in their work. The scenarios involve incompetence due to lack of oversight, failure to engage in ongoing education, practicing outside one's expertise, allowing personal problems to impact work, and recommending unproven treatments due to personal beliefs.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    BC230418158 Psy611

    Uploaded by

    rhanzla1220
    149 views2 pages
    The document discusses five scenarios involving psychologists violating ethical standards in their work. The scenarios involve incompetence due to lack of oversight, failure to engage in ongoing education, practicing outside one's expertise, allowing personal problems to impact work, and recommending unproven treatments due to personal beliefs.

    Original Title

    BC230418158_PSY611

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document discusses five scenarios involving psychologists violating ethical standards in their work. The scenarios involve incompetence due to lack of oversight, failure to engage in ongoing education, practicing outside one's expertise, allowing personal problems to impact work, and recommending unproven treatments due to personal beliefs.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    149 views2 pages

    BC230418158 Psy611

    Uploaded by

    rhanzla1220
    The document discusses five scenarios involving psychologists violating ethical standards in their work. The scenarios involve incompetence due to lack of oversight, failure to engage in ongoing education, practicing outside one's expertise, allowing personal problems to impact work, and recommending unproven treatments due to personal beliefs.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    You are on page 1of 2

    PSY 611

    Assignment # 01
    Student ID: BC230418158
    Solution:

    Sr. Scenario Identification of Justification


    # Violation
    Dr. Mazhar, a sociology professor,
    Delegating
    delegates grading responsibilities for a
    responsibilities without
    midterm exam to a teaching assistant
    first proving the
    without providing clear guidelines or
    1 Competence assistant's competency
    oversight. The teaching assistant, lacking
    violates ethical
    experience and guidance, applies
    standards, resulting in
    inconsistent grading criteria, resulting in
    biased evaluations.
    unfair evaluations for students.
    Dr. Patel, a psychologist, completes her
    doctoral degree and begins her private
    Failure to engage in
    practice. Over time, Dr. Patel becomes
    ongoing education
    complacent and fails to engage in ongoing
    Professional violates the duty to
    2 professional development activities or
    Competence maintain professional
    attend relevant workshops and conferences.
    competence, potentially
    As a result, her knowledge and skills
    injuring clients.
    stagnate, leading to potential gaps in her
    practice.
    Dr. Smith, a clinical psychologist, accepts a
    client who presents with symptoms of
    obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD). Providing therapy
    Despite having no formal training or outside of one's area of
    experience in treating OCD, Dr. Smith expertise goes against
    3 Competence
    proceeds with therapy sessions, hoping to ethical values and puts
    expand her practice. As sessions progress, it the client's well-being
    becomes evident that Dr. Smith lacks the at risk.
    expertise to effectively address the client's
    specific needs.
    Dr. Chen, a psychologist, experiences
    Failure to address
    significant personal stressors due to family
    personal difficulties
    issues. Despite struggling to cope with her
    when meeting clients
    own challenges, Dr. Chen continues to see Personal
    4 compromises
    clients without addressing her emotional Problems
    professional conduct,
    wellbeing or seeking appropriate support,
    potentially jeopardizing
    potentially compromising the quality of her
    treatment sessions.
    therapy sessions.
    Dr. Garcia, a psychologist, recommends a Ignoring documented
    controversial treatment approach to a client evidence of personal
    based on personal beliefs rather than prejudices violates
    5 Integrity
    established scientific evidence. Despite professional integrity
    research indicating limited effectiveness and risks harm to the
    client.

    You might also like