ACKNOWLEDGMENT

I would like to take this opportunity to thank to those that facilitated in the completion of this
document, as well as those that displayed endless support and encouragement through my graduate
education. First, I would like to acknowledge Sir. Mushtaq Ahmed as my research advisor for his
flexibility, advice, and dedication in helping me complete my research. It goes without saying that he
was more accommodating during the tough semester. I would like to thank Sir. Mushtaq Ahmed for all
of his advice in appropriate methodology, controls and analysis. Second, I would like to thank My
support system my family because this is not possible without your support. Thank you for instilling a
love of scientific research and education as well as supporting me throughout my various endeavors
Submitted to: Dr Mushtaq

Submitted by: Faiza Mazhar

Topic: Assessment for Learning At Elementary Level

Introduction:

Learning is “a process that leads to change, which occurs as a result of experience and increases
the potential for improved performance and future learning” (Ambrose, 2010). School is a place
where learning takes place and effective learning can be done through assessment because
learning and assessment are interconnected processes that complement each other in education.
Assessment serves as a tool to measure and evaluate the extent of learning that has taken place.

Assessment includes collecting a wide range of information on aspect learning such as the
child’s growth and self-esteem, interpersonal and intrapersonal behavior, and the attainment of
wide range of knowledge, skill, attitude and values (Airasian, 1996). Classroom assessment as
the process of collecting, recording, interpreting, using and communicating information about
child’s progress and achievement during the development of knowledge, concept, skills and
attitude (Winter, 1993).
The basis of any educational reforms depends on what happen in the classroom. A classroom is a
place of social interrelation between teacher and students. In a classroom teachers and students
participate in various activities such as reviewing the previous lesson, listening to the teacher’s
explanation, discussion of ideas, practicing and brief work as a whole class, small groups or
individually (Hino, 2006). A computer picture of an education system is claimed to improve
when teacher made classroom-based assessment are used with the view of supporting teaching
and learning process (Assessment Reform Group, 2002; Heritage, 2010). Assessment is viewed
as important tool in the process of teaching and learning because it enhances a teacher to monitor
the teaching learning process as well as the ascertain student’s achievement in each area of their
development (Cuevas, 1991).

Assessment is an important part of effective teaching and learning. It allows achievements to be

recognized and helps both teachers and learners to reflect on and review their performance and
progress. While assessment has long been an end-of-learning activity to measure what learners
can do. A new perception now encourages ongoing evaluation in the classroom to improve
learning with a definite focus on assessment for learning (AFL). It informs teachers about the
latest developments and provides teachers with significant tools for integrating assessment in the
classroom.

The term ‘Assessment for Learning’ became popular in the 1990s. At this time there was concern
that learners were being over-assessed and that there was a focus on end results (assessment of
learning) rather than on assessment processes that could actively enable learners to make
progress. Both assessment for learning and assessment of learning are valuable in education, but
they have different purposes. AfL is concerned with maximizing the feedback process (teacher to
student and student to teacher) to optimize student learning. Feedback ranges from the informal
(e.g. oral comments given immediately to learners as they think through problems), to more
formal (e.g. written feedback given after an end-of-topic test). AfL also involves high-quality
peer and self-assessment where learners or peers may be involved in making decisions about
future learning needs (Wiliam, 2018).
One of the goals of AfL is the sharpening of students‟ appetite to learn by creating in the
classroom and in the school a rich learning culture through skillful manipulation of both the
physical and psychological environments involving both cognitive and affective variables in the
classroom. Learning has both intrinsic and extrinsic aspects. While assessment of learning is
concerned with the extrinsic aspects of learning, that is, assessing the outcome of learning,
assessment for learning is a new move aimed at assessing the intrinsic aspects of learning in
order to raise individual’s learning level. Assessment for Learning (AfL) is the process of
seeking and interpreting evidence for use by learners and their teachers to decide where learners
are in their learning, where they need to go and how best to get there (ARG, 2002). AfL is
characteristically different from AoL since AfL retrieves information from the learner in a
comprehensive manner such that even aspects of the hidden curriculum such as motivation and
attitude are assessed (ARG ,2002). AfL is more centered on what can be done to enhance
learning, and how non-performance components of can be assessed. Performance-driven
assessment cannot provide valid materials with which effective job could be done on enhancing
learning, “they are limited in scope, and lead to teaching for assessment not teaching for
learning” (Birenbaum, 2006), and “do not allow learners to develop a clearer understanding of
how they can improve in their learning”. Assessment for learning is multidimensional in nature,
a means of measuring the learner’s progression and informing him/her about such progression
and about areas for and ways of improvement. In other words, “a paradigm shift from assessment
of learning towards assessment for learning is required” (Birenbaum, 2006).

Statement of the problem:

In educational settings, the traditional approach to assessment often stresses summative

assessments, which focus on evaluating student's knowledge and performance at the end of a
learning period. It does not focus on assessing student’s growth during the instruction so there is
a need to shift the emphasis from solely summative assessment to a more comprehensive
approach known as ‘‘Assessment for Learning” (AfL). Assessment for Learning, also referred to
as formative assessment, is designed to support and enhance the learning process by providing
ongoing feedback to both students and educators. These assessments play an important role in
measuring achievement, they may not provide students with the ongoing feedback and
opportunities for improvement needed to enhance their learning experience.

Objectives:

Objectives of this study are:

• To explain the concept of assessment for learning.

• To explore the strategis for conducting assessment for learning

Methodology:

This study is a qualitative overview to provide detailed and comprehensive information about
assessment used for learning. The target group were elementary students. The data was collected
from various research articles and literature reviews to find out how assessment strategies can be
used by both teachers and students to cultivate healthy learning environment in the classroom.

Significance:
Assessment for learning plays an essential role in encouraging effective teaching and improving
student learning outcomes. It's a dynamic process that supports ongoing growth and development
in education. Assessment for learning is a crucial component of education. It not only enhances
the learning experience for students but also supports the continuous improvement of teaching
methods and overall educational quality. Assessment for Learning is significant because it
transforms education into a dynamic, student-centered, and responsive process that benefits both
learners and educators, ultimately leading to improved educational outcomes and lifelong
learning skills. It recognizes that each student is unique and has different learning needs. AfL
helps modify instruction to meet these individual needs, resulting in a more personalized learning
experience. AfL fosters a growth mindset and motivates students to actively engage in their
learning. When students see their progress and know they can improve, they are more likely to
stay engaged and motivated. It involves developing learner autonomy so they can assess
themselves accurately and regulate their own learning.
CHAPTER:2

REVIEW OF LITERATURE

Assessment:

Assessment is the process of gathering and discussing information from multiple and diverse
sources in order to develop a deep understanding of what students know, understand, and can do
with their knowledge as a result of their educational experiences; the process ends when
assessment results are used to improve subsequent learning. (Huba and Freed, 2000).

Assessment is the systematic basis for making inferences about the learning and development of
students. It is the process of defining, selecting, designing, collecting, analyzing, interpreting,
and using information to increase students' learning and development. (Erwin, 1991).

Assessment is the systematic collection, review, and use of information about educational
programs undertaken for the purpose of improving student learning and development. (Palomba
and Banta, 1999).

Importance of Assessment:

It is an integral part of instruction, as it determines whether or not educational objectives are

being met, it is a crucial component of instruction. Assessment can be used both to evaluate
student outcomes and to support student learning. Decisions regarding curriculum, instructional
needs, placement, advancement, grades, and, occasionally, funding are influenced by assessment.
Today's students need to know not only the fundamentals of reading and writing, but also skills
that will prepare them for a world that is changing all the time. They need to be capable of
critical thought, analysis, and deduction. For teachers as well, assessment is crucial. To find out
how successful their teaching strategies are. A variety of aspects are measured by assessments
used in education. Assembling proof of students' prior knowledge and tailoring lessons
appropriately are also included. The assessment of students' performance is done through weekly
tests and end-of-term exams. Educators must actively participate in determining the goal of
assessments and the subject matter being evaluated.

Concept of Assessment for Learning:

Contrarily, Assessment for Learning (AfL) appears to be concentrated on instructional methods

and approaches related to classroom instruction (Black and Wiliam, 1998).

One of the most effective methods for encouraging student learning is currently acknowledged to
be assessment for learning (AfL) (Gardner, 2012).

AfL helps students develop self-regulation in tracking, planning, and evaluating their own
learning outcomes with the help of self-reflection (Chen and Bonner, 2020).

AfL, or assessment for learning, as a potentially very successful teaching strategy (MacPhail &
Halbert, 2010. Under the direction of the British Educational Research Association, a group of
educational assessment researchers created the Assessment Reform Group in 1989. Since then,
the group has played a significant role in advancing the idea and application of assessment for
learning. One of the Group's members Caroline Gipps (1994) distinguished between assessment
of learning, which involves evaluating what has been learned, and assessment for learning, which
involves incorporating evaluation into the teaching and learning process to enhance learning.
This formulation, which is still widely used today, equates formative assessment with assessment
for learning and summative assessment with assessment of learning

AfL emphasizes the quality of the learning process and is viewed as a social and contextual event
that takes place as part of ongoing classroom practices. AfL is a process of actively engaging
students in assessment processes (including self-, peer-, and instructor-based assessment)
throughout learning with the aim of improving achievement, developing metacognition, and
supporting motivated learning and positive student self-perceptions. While the theory and
practice of AfL are still evolving. Furthermore, AfL procedures might aid in the growth of
students' self-control, which is essential for encouraging autonomous learning (Assessment
Reform Group, 2002). Feedback is constantly consolidated in this process to direct future
learning, and is focused on the class or individual level. Students are expected to evaluate their
own and their peers' learning, and they play a crucial role in AfL. A significant long-haul
objective of AfL is to encouraging student autonomy by assisting them with figuring out how to
learn.

Wiliam and Thompson, 2007 describe three fundamental concepts which are the focus of AfL
for both teachers and students to comprehend:

• where the student intends to go:

When lesson objectives and success criteria are shared, students are better able to understand
their goals and the steps necessary to reach them.

• Where the learner is now:

Teachers can assess what students have learned individually and in groups during a lesson by
using strategies like effective questioning, which will produce useful learning evidence for both
the teacher and the students.

• How Can the Learner Get There:

Teachers make decisions about their next course of action with a class or individual students
based on this evidence of learning. This information can be used by learners to inform decisions
about their education, such as how best to use their free study time.

Characteristics of Assessment for Learning:

• Continuous and Ongoing Process:

End-of-semester and summative exams are not the only occasions when AfL is used. It is
continuous and ongoing. It includes a range of in-class discussions, quizzes, peer assessments,
and self-evaluations. The purpose of these tests is to provide students with frequent opportunities
to consider and deepen their understanding.

• Self-Evaluation and Reflection:

Active Learning (AfL) encourages students to evaluate their own work and consider how far they
have come in their education. Students who self-assess their abilities gain a better understanding
of their strengths and weaknesses as well as metacognitive skills.

• Provide Feedback:

Feedback is another crucial aspect of AfL, highlighted by Hattie and Timperley (2007) is to give
timely and helpful feedback. Students receive performance feedback from instructors that points
out their areas of strength and growth. This feedback is targeted at learning outcomes, specific,
and actionable. Students can modify their learning strategy by using this feedback.

• Use Diverse Assessment Techniques:

AfL promotes the use of a range of assessment techniques, including more avant-garde strategies
like group projects, presentations, and portfolios in addition to more conventional tests and
assignments. The selection of assessment techniques should to be in line with the learning
objectives and offer a thorough picture of the performance of the students.

• Flexibility:

AfL acknowledges that students have different learning styles, paces, and needs. Teachers
should take a flexible approach, giving each student the chance to show their understanding in a
way that best suits their unique learning style and strength.

Assessment for Learning Strategies:

The publications of Black and Wiliam in 1998 on formative classroom assessment were followed
by a boost in research on formative assessment, especially work on AfL, with researchers from
many countries reporting the impact of AfL implementation. Much of this research focuses on
Black, William and Thompson's (2007) study of their key strategies for implementing AfL,
identified in their work and teachers involved in the AfL project should use these strategies in the
classroom in order to identify his students’ strengths and weaknesses and make improvements to
their own learning and assessment for learning strategis are as under:
(a) use effective questioning strategies to gauge students' understanding;

(b) Peer Assessment

(c) Self-Assessment

(d) Class observation

(e) Use effective strategies for providing feedback

Questioning techniques:

For centuries, questions have been a fundamental teaching tool because they are cognitive skill
activators among students (Aydemir and Çiftçi, 2008). Questioning skills are very important to
ensure quality teaching and learning. Questioning skills are very important to ensure quality
teaching and learning. Teachers question students for about eighty percent of the time they are in
class (Marzano, 2001). Black and Harrison (2004) point out that teacher questions can be used
for a variety of purposes, including: to encourage comparison; classify, group, and identify
exceptions; predict – and they play many different roles in the classroom. Chin (2006) reports on
a study of teachers' questions and comments. Chin explains that questioning is constructive, with
the teacher's purpose being to elicit what students are thinking, build on previous answers, and
build conceptual knowledge. Asking questions is seen as a way to diagnose and explore students'
ideas and support their thinking. Some teachers emphasize the frequent use of questions, which
are an effective and efficient way to encourage students to think and respond. In addition,
teachers should allow students enough waiting time to prepare to answer questions. If the student
does not understand the question, the questioner (teacher) should rephrase or modify the question
so that the answering process goes smoothly and successfully.

Van Zee (2001) conducted a study to investigate students' and teachers' questions during
scientific discourse. The study, based in the United States, involved students of different ages,
including elementary, middle, and high school. Van Zee found that students will ask questions if
given the opportunity to do so. Using structures such as the KWHL chart, in which students
identify what they know and wonder about a topic and identify how they can explore and decide
what they have learned, helps teachers Ask your students the right questions. Thinking about a
topic and asking students questions during discussion also helps build knowledge and elicit
questions from students. Van Zee find that students can ask questions based on their own
observations and feel comfortable discussing ideas with their peers to try to understand each
other's thinking. Finally, van Zee revealed that student questions arise when small groups of
students collaborate. This mirrors the findings of Harlen (2006d) and Macro and McFall (2004).
They also examined teachers' questioning practices and concluded that questioning can be used
to develop conceptual understanding. Questioning can also be used to encourage students to
clarify their meaning and explore a variety of perspectives. The use of 'silent' questioning and
reflection was also explored, with 'wait time' and providing information on a 'need to know' basis
used to encourage student reflection. Van Zee concluded that students can ask their own
questions and will do so if given the opportunity. As this field of research shows, questioning is
an important part of the science of learning and, if used appropriately, is an extremely useful AfL
tool because it helps discover what is learned. students know, identify their misconceptions and
plan their next steps in learning. Students study.

Class observation:

An essential tool in the classroom is observation, as highlighted by Wiliam & Black (2004).
Throughout group projects, discussions, and in-class activities, teachers are able to watch their
students. Individual learning styles, areas of strength and weakness, and engagement levels can
all be determined with the aid of these observations. Teacher should Observe students' facial
expressions to see if they are attentive and interested in the questions. It is imperative that
educators record their observations and offer students feedback in light of their conclusions.

Student self-Assessment:

Self-assessment is a form of assessment in AfL educational settings. The purpose is to evaluate

students' own work. Self-assessment involves an individual comparing his or her performance to
a desired goal to adjust and improve his or her practice. Self-assessment is closely related to self-
regulation, which is widely recognized as a trademark of competent disciplinary practice
(Zimmerman 2002). One of the most effective technique is to get students to evaluate their own
knowledge and learning. Students can think about their own presentations, reports, projects, etc.
This is very valuable as self-assessment helps students to critique their own work, which is why
teacher strongly encourages students to do this. Some teachers acknowledged that self-evaluation
is a good means of self-reflection. Through the self-evaluation process, students can identify
their strengths and weaknesses, thereby achieving personal growth and self-improvement.
Teachers recommended that self-assessment be conducted during instruction or after class. Some
teachers found that their students did not have sufficient assessment skills to assess themselves.
Therefore, it is important to provide students with the necessary self-assessment skills during
lessons.

Peer assessment:

In peer assessment, teachers expressed that the role of examiner shifts from the teacher to the
student, examining and evaluating the work of others during or after class. One teacher suggested
that students need a demonstration of peer assessment. This will help you better understand the
requirements and standards, how to rate or evaluate others with appropriate comments, and how
to provide goals that others can achieve. Another teacher argued that students should be provided
with more opportunities for peer assessment to enhance student-to-student and student-teacher
interaction. Through this process, students will be able to think deeply and deeply. Such work
can encourage advanced learners to be more active and to reflect and improve. Inexperienced
learners can receive useful feedback from experienced learners. One teacher suggested that peer
assessment could be done as a summative assessment at the end of a class activity, but could also
be done during the activity. Both oral and written evaluations are welcomed and accepted. To
improve teaching and learning, but this type of assessment requires more time.

Feedback to students:

Quality feedback to students is critical to teaching and learning. During the teaching and learning
process, teachers identified students' strengths and weaknesses, and as a result, they believed that
they could provide appropriate and relevant feedback to students so that they could better
understand their learning performance. It is believed that students who know their strengths are
more confident in their learning and more motivated to learn if supported. It is also true that
when students know their weaknesses, they strive to improve their learning through specific
goals and objectives. It is important that teacher feedback is specific and informed so that
students can effectively develop their learning skills. Some teachers in the AfL project argued
that, apart from quality, the quantity of feedback was important because it forced students to
think and reflect on their own learning.
Although Butler's actual work (1987, 1988) is outside the scope/duration of this review, it has
influenced much of the research discussed in the feedback area. Butler compared the
effectiveness of providing different types of markings when feedback was given in different
ways. Students in one group received grades or grades only, students in another group received
grades and comments, and students in a third group received only comments. Butler concluded
that comment-only grading tended to produce the greatest learning gains compared to children
who received only grades or grades and comments. References to comment-only marking are
relatively common in the feedback-themed literature

Gathering evidence of student learning:

Preserving evidence of learning is also an important task for teachers. Teachers in the AfL
project acknowledged that gaining a deeper understanding of students and their work through
projects, portfolios, images, essays, etc., would in turn have a positive impact on classroom
progress. Teachers agreed to justify their progress in teaching and learning and to take follow-up
measures to achieve further improvements. Teachers can also tailor lesson objectives and content
to meet students' needs and interests. However, teachers should be careful to give students
enough time to complete their assignments and give them more time and space to think. To put
some of the findings in this area into context, it is worth summarizing some of Butler's seminal
work.

A research of teachers' reflective practices regarding the use of AfL strategies in Hong
Kong schools:

Ten elementary schools and ten kindergartens participated in this research. AfL is an important
component of learning and teaching, it is worthwhile to consider teachers' practices in
implementing AfL teaching strategies into their daily teaching. The purpose of this study was to
examine (a) teachers' reflective practices regarding the effectiveness of their use of the AfL
strategies and corresponding recommendations for improvement; The purpose of this study is to
investigate how they can use this information to adapt their teaching practices.

Data Collection:
Samples were taken from a group of her 10 elementary schools and 10 kindergartens that
participated in the AfL project. As part of the study, School Development Officers (SDOs)
visited each participating school and conducted classroom observations. SDO, who also acts as a
peer coach, provides specific and relevant verbal and written feedback to teachers, which they
use to further improve their instruction. SDOs were tasked with conducting classroom
observations. They observed whether teachers used AfL skills and teaching strategies in the
classroom. the SDO guides teachers to reflect on these her AfL strategies after classroom
observations and advises them to adapt their teaching to guide student learning.

Findings

Teachers' self-assessment of implementing AfL strategies After observing 34 lessons, teachers

were asked to rate their implementation of AfL strategis in class based on their own reflections.
The quantitative results of the self-evaluation are summarized in Table 1 and show the extent to
which elementary school teachers and kindergarten teachers implement her AfL strategies.
Comparing the AfL teaching strategies used in the study between kindergarten and primary
school, clear differences were observed in the use of ``sharing success criteria,'' ``peer
assessment,'' and ``gathering evidence of student learning'' in the classroom.

For example, elementary school teachers were better than kindergarten teachers in implementing
the first two her AfL strategies, but weaker than the latter in "gathering evidence of student
learning" during lessons. The results of the present study show that all teaching strategies of
AfL were successfully utilized across the schools participating in the study Comparison of self-
assessment of AfL strategies between kindergarten teachers and elementary school teachers in
this study.

The role of the teacher in Implementing AfL:

Teachers must be able to create teaching situations in which AfL strategies can be used and must
be aware of the role of students, colleagues and teachers in various AfL practices. Stimulating
students' thinking to clarify learning and common misconceptions is an important instructional
strategy for teachers to master.
 Aschbacher and Alonzo (2006) found that using questions and prompts that provide a
conceptual focus are most effective in stimulating student thinking and promoting learning. This
is especially true when compared to overly prescriptive counseling strategies. Teachers should be
able to encourage students to participate in discussions about their answers, expertise, and
feedback. Discussions give teachers valuable insight into students' thinking, difficulties, and
understandings. This information can be used to adjust instruction and provide feedback.

Additionally, teachers need the knowledge and skills to develop assessments that achieve the
desired objectives. This includes the ability to develop questions (used in daily classroom
practice) that provide evidence of student learning and to critically evaluate assessment tools.

Principles of Assessment for Learning:

The goals of assessment for learning are to support educators and learners in tracking and
enhancing learning results over time. These guidelines can help create a more productive and
encouraging learning environment where students actively participate in their education and have
a better understanding of their progress and how to get better. Here are the key principles:

• The inclusion of AfL in the planning process for teaching and learning is the first of the
ten principles of assessment for learning. This means that a teacher needs to provide
opportunities for both the student and the teacher to learn about the student's current level
of understanding and how they can move closer to their learning objectives. Some degree
of flexibility is required. What the pupils are learning and why should be evident.
Additionally, learning should include opportunities for feedback.

• The focus needs to be on how students learn, according to the second principle. This can
be accomplished by training students to become self-reflective thinkers who can identify
the best ways to process new information for themselves.
• The use of AFL in the classroom needs to be paramount. Every assignment and question
should be created with the intention of learning more about the students' backgrounds and
areas of application.

• Teachers should view AfL as a critical professional competency. In addition to planning

for assessment in their lessons, they must also learn to monitor student learning, analyze
and interpret evidence of learning, and provide insightful and helpful feedback.

• All criticism needs to be offered tactfully and constructively. Since feedback naturally
contains an emotional component. Additionally, educators have a duty to attend to and be
cognizant of the emotional needs of their students.

• Teachers need to consider the significance of learner motivation as the sixth principle of
assessment for learning. What pupils are able to learn in any given time period will
depend on their level of motivation. Students are more likely to move closer to their
objectives if they are motivated. It is acknowledged that one of the main components of
feeling motivated is having goals and believing that one has made progress toward them.

• By disclosing the assessment criteria to students, teachers can ensure that they remain
dedicated to their learning objectives. It should be clear to students what will be
evaluated of them. It ought not to be a.

• All students should receive constructive guidance on the pathways for improvement

• The most important principle behind effective assessment for learning in the class is that
a teacher should help a student develop some self-awareness and help them to be able to
self-assess.
 • Last principle of assessment for learning is that the teacher should recognize the full
spectrum of educational achievement of all the students in the class.

Assessment for Learning Positive or Negative:

In general, assessment for learning is seen as a highly effective way to enhance student learning.
Some people, though, are not happy with it. Dissatisfaction with the more limited definitions of
assessment for learning as formative evaluation/feedback is one of the reasons the phrase
"assessment as learning" is used. According to Earl (2003), assessment for learning is essentially
the same as formative assessment, and teachers are viewed as "the central characters" because
they assess student performance, offer feedback, and plan relevant learning activities based on
their understanding of the students. Contrarily, according to Earl, assessment emphasizes the role
of the student and, in particular, involves them in self-evaluation and as active agents in shaping
their own learning. Similar distinctions are made by the Scottish "Assessment is for Learning
Project. Learning assessment is understood as a collection of procedures that inform students
about their progress and the necessary results. Through reflection and review, assessment for
learning is understood to be about students managing and taking ownership of their own learning
and development. Similar to Earl's situation, this perspective highlights how important the
student is. Different perspectives exist on assessment for learning.

Practical Barriers to AfL Integration in Classroom:

Practical barriers to integration Studies on AfL integration have considered practical constraints
such as time, class size and resources on teachers’ adoption of AfL practices. The shortage of
time is frequently mentioned in research on changing assessment practices (Torrance & Pryor,
2001). Specifically, teachers believe that traditional forms of assessment are more time efficient
and have more value because they serve summative requirements and accountability demands
(Hargreaves, Earl, & Schmidt, 2002; Mabry et al., 2003). Even among those teachers who
appreciate the potential of AfL to positively influence student achievement, there are concerns
that AfL demands too much class time to integrate and that AfL implementation limits the
amount of curriculum teachers can cover within their programme (Morgan & Watson, 2002).
Carless (2005) noted that teachers believed AfL was good in theory, but that it was not practical
to implement, especially within a context of competing curriculum demands. This perception
contributed to low adoption rates of AfL in the classroom.

Duncan and Noonan (2007) argued for the importance of knowing how teachers’ assessment
strategies are influenced by types of classroom learning conditions (i.e., class size and
resources). However, their actual research did not provide clear evidence to support the position
that teachers with smaller class sizes tended to use AfL practices more than teachers of larger
classes. This finding may have been limited due to small effect sizes within this research,
suggesting that further research is needed in this area for more conclusive evidence. A second
aspect of classroom learning conditions that often impacts the integration of new educational
policies and practices is resources (i.e., funding, personnel and technology). AfL integration
requires notably few additional resources (Black, Harrison, Lee, Marshall, & Wiliam, 2003). The
majority of classroom strategies associated with AfL focus on student and teacher interaction
rather than on the use of sophisticated resources or technologies. As such, like class size,
resources do not appear to limit the integration of AfL in teaching and learning. Regardless,
additional research has been suggested into the practical barriers to AfL integration so that these
barriers can be sufficiently considered when constructing initiatives to better support teachers in
AfL implementation.

Analysis:

The study appropriately charts the historical evolution of AfL, connecting it to the establishment
of the Assessment Reform Group in 1989. The understanding of AfL is deepened by this
historical perspective. It recognizes the existence of related terms, like formative assessment, and
draws consideration to the difficulties in distinguishing between them semantically. To properly
adopt AfL, educators must understand the clarification between Assessment for Learning (AfL)
and Assessment of Learning (Aol). A crucial realization that closes the apparent divide between
AfL and AoL is the emphasis on feedback as a unifying element between the two. A deeper
understanding of the topic is provided by the examination of teachers' dual conceptions of AfL
from the perspectives of both teachers and students. AfL offers a refined understanding of the
philosophy through contrasting externalized and social constructivist perspectives on learning.
An extensive summary is given by clarifying the continuous and ongoing assessment, self-
evaluation, variety of assessment methods, adaptability, and student-centered approaches as
essential components of AfL. Modern educational ideas are in line with the emphasis on
developing a learning environment that can be tailored to each student's needs. utilizing a variety
of assessment strategies, including self-evaluation, peer evaluation, and observations. The
recognition that the selection of assessment strategies should to be predicated on learning
objectives, student age, developmental stage, and subject matter demonstrates a realistic
comprehension of execution. These include organizing, emphasizing student learning, giving
AFL top priority in the classroom, and considering AFL as an essential professional skill. It is
indicative of a balanced analysis that different points of view on AfL are acknowledged,
including both positive and negative ones. The recognition of practical difficulties, such as time
limitations and concerns regarding the size of the class, presents an accurate picture of the
difficulties that educators encounter. One indication that evidence-based strategies are needed to
support AfL integration is the call for more research on practical barriers.

Conclusion:

In this study, I have concluded that the idea of Assessment for Learning (AfL) is emphasized as a
powerful tactic, emphasizing teaching technique and strategy that actively involve students in the
evaluation process at every stage of their educational journey. Although the concept of using
assessment to help students has been around for a while, the historical perspective shows that the
phrase "assessment for learning" has only recently become widely used in educational settings.
At elementary level, the assessment for learning approach places a strong emphasis on self-
evaluation, continuous and ongoing assessment, constructive feedback, a variety of assessment
techniques, and flexibility to accommodate various learning styles. AfL employs a variety of
strategies, such as questioning, discussion, peer and self-assessment, observations, and self-
assessment, to enhance instruction and foster a growth mindset in students. AfL in the teaching
and learning planning process, focusing on how students learn, making AfL a priority in the
classroom, considering it a critical professional competency, offering constructive feedback,
acknowledging the significance of learner motivation, providing guidance on improvement
pathways, fostering self-awareness and self-assessment in students, and recognizing the full
spectrum of educational achievement. Although assessment for learning is a useful tool for
improving student learning, but there are also real-world obstacles to its integration, such as
problems with time, resources, and class size. Teachers may be resistant to implementing AfL
practices because they believe that traditional assessment techniques are more time-efficient and
in line with accountability requirements. In order to effectively implement assessment for
learning, educators must resolve these practical obstacles, and encourage a mentality shift that
places a higher priority on ongoing assessment, student engagement.
References:

Wiliam, D. (2011). What is assessment for learning?. Studies in educational evaluation, 37(1), 3-14.

Lysaght, Z., O’LEARY, M., & Ludlow, L. (2017). Measuring teachers’ Assessment for Learning (AfL)
classroom practices in elementary schools. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 3(2), 103-
115.

Ninomiya, S. (2016). The possibilities and limitations of assessment for learning: Exploring the theory of
formative assessment and the notion of “closing the learning gap”. Educational studies in Japan, 10, 79-
91.

Reinholz, D. (2016). The assessment cycle: A model for learning through peer assessment. Assessment
& Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(2), 301-315.

McDowell, L., Sambell, K., & Davison, G. (2009). Assessment for learning: a brief history and review of
terminology.

Hodgson, C., & Pyle, K. (2010). A literature review of Assessment for Learning in science. Slough: Nfer.

DeLuca, C., Luu, K., Sun, Y., & Klinger, D. A. (2012). Assessment for learning in the classroom: Barriers
to implementation and possibilities for teacher professional learning. Assessment Matters, 4, 5-29.

Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2004). Working inside the black box:
Assessment for learning in the classroom. Phi delta kappan, 86(1), 8-21.

Nenty, H. J., & Lusweti, S. L. (2006). Assessment for learning (AfL): Implications for the achievement of
the goals of basic education in Africa. In African Conference on Primary/Basic Education, University of
Botswana, Gaborone, Botswana.

Hume, A., & Coll, R. K. (2009). Assessment of learning, for learning, and as learning: New Zealand case
studies. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 16(3), 269-290.
Reem, J., & Yan, L. (2017). Assessment for learning in the calculus classroom: A proactive approach to
engage students in active learning. Jurnal IEJME-Mathematics Education, 12, 517.

Chueachot, S., Srisa-ard, B., & Srihamongkol, Y. (2013). The Development of an Assessment for
Learning Model for Elementary Classroom. International Education Studies, 6(9), 119-124.

Sardareh, S. A., Saad, M. R. M., Othman, A. J., & Me, R. C. (2014). ESL Teachers' Questioning
Technique in an Assessment for Learning Context: Promising or Problematic?. International Education
Studies, 7(9), 161-174.

Hargreaves, E. (2005). Assessment for learning? Thinking outside the (black) box. Cambridge Journal of
Education, 35(2), 213-224.

Wiliam, D. (2006). Mathematics inside the black box: Assessment for learning in the mathematics
classroom. Granada Learning.

Pang, N. S. K. (2022). Teachers’ reflective practices in implementing assessment for learning skills in
classroom teaching. ECNU Review of Education, 5(3), 470-490.

Bartlett, J. (2015). Outstanding assessment for learning in the classroom. Routledge.

Carless, D. (2005). Prospects for the implementation of assessment for learning. Assessment in
Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 12(1), 39-54.

Heitink, M. C., Van der Kleij, F. M., Veldkamp, B. P., Schildkamp, K., & Kippers, W. B. (2016). A
systematic review of prerequisites for implementing assessment for learning in classroom
practice. Educational research review, 17, 50-62.

Chomchaiya, C., & Owatnupat, N. Assessment for Learning (AfL): An Assessment Method Easing
University to Workplace Transition of the Early Childhood Preservice Teachers.

Chappuis, J. (2009). Assessment for learning: Classroom practices that maximize student
success. Portland: Assessment Training Institute. Recuperado de http://d43fweuh3sg51. cloudfront.
net/media/media_files/sevenstrategies. pdf.

Wiliam*, D., Lee, C., Harrison, C., & Black, P. (2004). Teachers developing assessment for learning:
Impact on student achievement. Assessment in education: principles, policy & practice, 11(1), 49-65.

Shepard, L. (2001). The role of classroom assessment in teaching and learning.