Firm 39914

BrokerCheck Report
WESTPARK CAPITAL, INC.

CRD# 39914
Section Title Page(s)

Report Summary 1
Firm Profile 2-6
Firm History 7
Firm Operations 8 - 13
Disclosure Events 14
i Please be aware that fraudsters may link to BrokerCheck from phishing and similar scam websites, trying to steal your personal information or your money.
Make sure you know who you’re dealing with when investing, and contact FINRA with any concerns.
For more information read our investor alert on imposters.
About BrokerCheck®
BrokerCheck offers information on all current, and many former, registered securities brokers, and all current and former
registered securities firms. FINRA strongly encourages investors to use BrokerCheck to check the background of
securities brokers and brokerage firms before deciding to conduct, or continue to conduct, business with them.
· What is included in a BrokerCheck report?
· BrokerCheck reports for individual brokers include information such as employment history, professional
qualifications, disciplinary actions, criminal convictions, civil judgments and arbitration awards. BrokerCheck
reports for brokerage firms include information on a firm’s profile, history, and operations, as well as many of the Using this site/information means
same disclosure events mentioned above. that you accept the FINRA
· Please note that the information contained in a BrokerCheck report may include pending actions or BrokerCheck Terms and
allegations that may be contested, unresolved or unproven. In the end, these actions or allegations may be Conditions. A complete list of
resolved in favor of the broker or brokerage firm, or concluded through a negotiated settlement with no Terms and Conditions can be
admission or finding of wrongdoing. found at
· Where did this information come from?
brokercheck.finra.org
· The information contained in BrokerCheck comes from FINRA’s Central Registration Depository, or
CRD® and is a combination of:
o information FINRA and/or the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) require brokers and
brokerage firms to submit as part of the registration and licensing process, and For additional information about
o information that regulators report regarding disciplinary actions or allegations against firms or brokers. the contents of this report, please
· How current is this information? refer to the User Guidance or
· Generally, active brokerage firms and brokers are required to update their professional and disciplinary www.finra.org/brokercheck. It
information in CRD within 30 days. Under most circumstances, information reported by brokerage firms, brokers provides a glossary of terms and a
and regulators is available in BrokerCheck the next business day. list of frequently asked questions,
· What if I want to check the background of an investment adviser firm or investment adviser as well as additional resources.
representative? For more information about
· To check the background of an investment adviser firm or representative, you can search for the firm or FINRA, visit www.finra.org.
individual in BrokerCheck. If your search is successful, click on the link provided to view the available licensing
and registration information in the SEC's Investment Adviser Public Disclosure (IAPD) website at
https://www.adviserinfo.sec.gov. In the alternative, you may search the IAPD website directly or contact your
state securities regulator at http://www.finra.org/Investors/ToolsCalculators/BrokerCheck/P455414.
· Are there other resources I can use to check the background of investment professionals?
· FINRA recommends that you learn as much as possible about an investment professional before
deciding to work with them. Your state securities regulator can help you research brokers and investment adviser
representatives doing business in your state.
·
Thank you for using FINRA BrokerCheck.
www.finra.org/brokercheck User Guidance
WESTPARK CAPITAL, INC. Report Summary for this Firm

CRD# 39914
SEC# 8-48898 This report summary provides an overview of the brokerage firm. Additional information for this firm can be found
in the detailed report.
Main Office Location Firm Profile Disclosure Events
1900 AVENUE OF THE STARS This firm is classified as a corporation.
SUITE 310 This firm was formed in Colorado on 10/17/1995. Brokerage firms are required to disclose certain
LOS ANGELES, CA 90067
Its fiscal year ends in December. criminal matters, regulatory actions, civil judicial
Regulated by FINRA Los Angeles Office
proceedings and financial matters in which the firm or
Mailing Address Firm History one of its control affiliates has been involved.
1900 AVENUE OF THE STARS Information relating to the brokerage firm's history
SUITE 310 Are there events disclosed about this firm? Yes
such as other business names and successions
LOS ANGELES, CA 90067 (e.g., mergers, acquisitions) can be found in the
detailed report. The following types of disclosures have been
Business Telephone Number
reported:
310-843-9300 Firm Operations
Type Count
This firm is registered with:
Regulatory Event 12
This firm is a brokerage firm and an investment • the SEC Arbitration 2
adviser firm. For more information about • 1 Self-Regulatory Organization
investment adviser firms, visit the SEC's • 53 U.S. states and territories
Investment Adviser Public Disclosure website at:
Is this brokerage firm currently suspended with any
https://www.adviserinfo.sec.gov
regulator? No
This firm is subject to FINRA Rule 3170 (Taping Rule).
This firm conducts 11 types of businesses. Click here for more information.
This firm is not affiliated with any financial or
investment institutions.
This firm has referral or financial arrangements with
other brokers or dealers.
©2021 FINRA. All rights reserved. Report about WESTPARK CAPITAL, INC. 1
Firm Profile
This firm is classified as a corporation.
This firm was formed in Colorado on 10/17/1995.
Its fiscal year ends in December.
Firm Names and Locations

This section provides the brokerage firm's full legal name, "Doing Business As" name, business and mailing
addresses, telephone number, and any alternate name by which the firm conducts business and where such name is
used.
WESTPARK CAPITAL, INC.

Doing business as WESTPARK CAPITAL, INC.
CRD# 39914
SEC# 8-48898
Main Office Location

1900 AVENUE OF THE STARS
SUITE 310
Regulated by FINRA Los Angeles Office
Mailing Address
1900 AVENUE OF THE STARS
SUITE 310
Business Telephone Number

310-843-9300
Other Names of this Firm

Name Where is it used
DILIGENT FINANCIAL GROUP CA
DUKES WEALTH MANAGEMENT INC. CA
Firm Profile
This section provides information relating to all direct owners and executive officers of the brokerage firm.
Direct Owners and Executive Officers

Legal Name & CRD# (if any): WESTPARK CAPITAL GROUP LLC
Is this a domestic or foreign Domestic Entity
entity or an individual?
Position SHAREHOLDER
Position Start Date 11/1999
Percentage of Ownership 75% or more
Does this owner direct the Yes
management or policies of
the firm?
Is this a public reporting No

company?
Legal Name & CRD# (if any): KRETSCHMER, WENDY LOUISE

3111589
Is this a domestic or foreign Individual
Position SENIOR EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Percentage of Ownership Less than 5%
the firm?

company?
Legal Name & CRD# (if any): ONESTO, RICHARD ERNEST

2453096
Position FINOP
Firm Profile
Direct Owners and Executive Officers (continued)
Does this owner direct the No
the firm?

company?
Legal Name & CRD# (if any): STERN, JASON SCOTT

2053515
Position CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER

the firm?

company?
Legal Name & CRD# (if any): TOCCO, NICHOLAS JAMES

5482327
Position PRESIDENT, CHIEF COMPLIANCE OFFICER

the firm?

company?
Legal Name & CRD# (if any): WISNIEWSKI, SARAH MARIE
©2021 FINRA. All rights reserved. 2340516

Report about WESTPARK CAPITAL, INC. 4
Firm Profile
Direct Owners and Executive Officers (continued)
2340516
Position CHIEF COMPLIANCE OFFICER - RIA

the firm?

company?
Firm Profile
This section provides information relating to any indirect owners of the brokerage firm.
Indirect Owners
Legal Name & CRD# (if any): RAPPAPORT, RICHARD ALYN
1885122
Company through which WESTPARK CAPITAL GROUP, LLC

indirect ownership is
established
Relationship to Direct Owner MEMBER
Relationship Established 11/1999
Percentage of Ownership 25% but less than 50%
the firm?
company?
Firm History
This section provides information relating to any successions (e.g., mergers, acquisitions) involving the firm.
No information reported.
Firm Operations
Registrations
This section provides information about the regulators (Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), self-regulatory
organizations (SROs), and U.S. states and territories) with which the brokerage firm is currently registered and
licensed, the date the license became effective, and certain information about the firm's SEC registration.
This firm is currently registered with the SEC, 1 SRO and 53 U.S. states and territories.
Federal Regulator Status Date Effective
SEC Approved 07/15/1996
SEC Registration Questions

This firm is registered with the SEC as:
A broker-dealer: Yes
A broker-dealer and government securities broker or dealer: Yes
A government securities broker or dealer only: No
This firm has ceased activity as a government securities broker or dealer: No
Self-Regulatory Organization Status Date Effective

FINRA Approved 07/15/1996
Firm Operations
Registrations (continued)
U.S. States & Status Date Effective U.S. States & Status Date Effective
Territories Territories
Alabama Approved 03/16/2000 North Carolina Approved 03/08/2000
Alaska Approved 02/07/2000 North Dakota Approved 04/25/2000
Arizona Approved 01/14/1999 Ohio Approved 03/10/2000
Arkansas Approved 03/10/2000 Oklahoma Approved 03/08/2000
California Approved 11/06/1998 Oregon Approved 03/17/1999
Colorado Approved 08/23/1996 Pennsylvania Approved 09/15/2000
Connecticut Approved 02/25/2000 Puerto Rico Approved 05/04/2007
Delaware Approved 04/05/2000 Rhode Island Approved 01/25/2000
District of Columbia Approved 03/16/2000 South Carolina Approved 03/08/2000
Florida Approved 09/22/2000 South Dakota Approved 01/10/2000
Georgia Approved 03/08/2000 Tennessee Approved 09/25/2000
Hawaii Approved 02/11/2002 Texas Approved 04/11/2000
Idaho Approved 02/01/2000 Utah Approved 01/05/2000
Illinois Approved 09/11/2000 Vermont Approved 04/20/2001
Indiana Approved 04/04/2000 Virgin Islands Approved 07/17/2018
Iowa Approved 02/07/2000 Virginia Approved 03/17/2000
Kansas Approved 04/05/2000 Washington Approved 04/09/1999
Kentucky Approved 03/23/2000 West Virginia Approved 02/03/2000
Louisiana Approved 02/04/2000 Wisconsin Approved 01/28/2000
Maine Approved 06/11/2001 Wyoming Approved 03/10/2000
Maryland Approved 02/07/2000
Massachusetts Approved 03/21/2000
Michigan Approved 01/11/2002
Minnesota Approved 05/01/2001
Mississippi Approved 04/12/2000
Missouri Approved 07/10/2002
Montana Approved 01/24/2000
Nebraska Approved 03/13/2000
Nevada Approved 10/28/1998
New Hampshire Approved 05/29/2001
New Jersey Approved 09/08/2000
New Mexico Approved 04/20/2000
New York Approved 05/05/2000
Firm Operations
Types of Business
This section provides the types of business, including non-securities business, the brokerage firm is engaged in or
expects to be engaged in.
This firm currently conducts 11 types of businesses.
Types of Business
Broker or dealer retailing corporate equity securities over-the-counter

Underwriter or selling group participant (corporate securities other than mutual funds)
Mutual fund retailer
U S. government securities dealer
U S. government securities broker
Broker or dealer selling variable life insurance or annuities
Put and call broker or dealer or option writer
Investment advisory services
Non-exchange member arranging for transactions in listed securities by exchange member
Private placements of securities
Other - CORPORATE FINANCE AND CONSULTING FEES
Other Types of Business

This firm does not effect transactions in commodities, commodity futures, or commodity options.
This firm does not engage in other non-securities business.
Non-Securities Business Description:
Firm Operations
Clearing Arrangements
This firm does not hold or maintain funds or securities or provide clearing services for other broker-dealer(s).
Introducing Arrangements
This firm does refer or introduce customers to other brokers and dealers.
Name: AXOS CLEARING LLC
CRD #: 117176
Business Address: 1200 LANDMARK CENTER
SUITE 800
OMAHA, NE 68102
Effective Date: 09/18/2012
Description: WESTPARK CAPITAL IS AN INTRODUCING BROKER DEALER TO AXOS
CLEARING LLC.
Firm Operations
Industry Arrangements
This firm does not have books or records maintained by a third party.
This firm does have accounts, funds, or securities maintained by a third party.
CRD #: 117176
SUITE 800
OMAHA, NE 68102
Description: AXOS CLEARING MAINTAINS ACCOUNTS FOR WESTPARK CAPITAL INC
This firm does have customer accounts, funds, or securities maintained by a third party.
CRD #: 117176
SUITE 800
OMAHA, NE 68102
Description: AXOS CLEARING LLC MAINTAINS ACCOUNTS FOR CLIENTS OF
WESTPARK CAPITAL INC
Control Persons/Financing
This firm does not have individuals who control its management or policies through agreement.
This firm does not have individuals who wholly or partly finance the firm's business.
Firm Operations
Organization Affiliates
This section provides information on control relationships the firm has with other firms in the securities, investment
advisory, or banking business.
This firm is not, directly or indirectly:

· in control of
· controlled by
· or under common control with
the following partnerships, corporations, or other organizations engaged in the securities or investment
advisory business.
This firm is not directly or indirectly, controlled by the following:

· bank holding company
· national bank
· state member bank of the Federal Reserve System
· state non-member bank
· savings bank or association
· credit union
· or foreign bank
Disclosure Events
All firms registered to sell securities or provide investment advice are required to disclose regulatory actions, criminal or
civil judicial proceedings, and certain financial matters in which the firm or one of its control affiliates has been involved.
For your convenience, below is a matrix of the number and status of disclosure events involving this brokerage firm or
one of its control affiliates. Further information regarding these events can be found in the subsequent pages of this
report.
Pending Final On Appeal
Regulatory Event 0 12 0
Arbitration N/A 2 N/A
Disclosure Event Details

What you should know about reported disclosure events:
1. BrokerCheck provides details for any disclosure event that was reported in CRD. It also includes
summary information regarding FINRA arbitration awards in cases where the brokerage firm was
named as a respondent.
2. Certain thresholds must be met before an event is reported to CRD, for example:
o A law enforcement agency must file formal charges before a brokerage firm is required to disclose a
particular criminal event.
3. Disclosure events in BrokerCheck reports come from different sources:
o Disclosure events for this brokerage firm were reported by the firm and/or regulators. When the firm
and a regulator report information for the same event, both versions of the event will appear in the
BrokerCheck report. The different versions will be separated by a solid line with the reporting source
labeled.
4. There are different statuses and dispositions for disclosure events:
o A disclosure event may have a status of pending, on appeal, or final.
§ A "pending" event involves allegations that have not been proven or formally adjudicated.
§ An event that is "on appeal" involves allegations that have been adjudicated but are currently
being appealed.
§ A "final" event has been concluded and its resolution is not subject to change.
o A final event generally has a disposition of adjudicated, settled or otherwise resolved.
§ An "adjudicated" matter includes a disposition by (1) a court of law in a criminal or civil matter,
or (2) an administrative panel in an action brought by a regulator that is contested by the party
charged with some alleged wrongdoing.
§ A "settled" matter generally involves an agreement by the parties to resolve the matter.
Please note that firms may choose to settle customer disputes or regulatory matters for
business or other reasons.
§ A "resolved" matter usually involves no payment to the customer and no finding of
wrongdoing on the part of the individual broker. Such matters generally involve customer
disputes.
5. You may wish to contact the brokerage firm to obtain further information regarding any of the
disclosure events contained in this BrokerCheck report.
Regulatory - Final
This type of disclosure event involves (1) a final, formal proceeding initiated by a regulatory authority (e.g., a state
securities agency, self-regulatory organization, federal regulator such as the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission,
foreign financial regulatory body) for a violation of investment-related rules or regulations; or (2) a revocation or
suspension of the authority of a brokerage firm or its control affiliate to act as an attorney, accountant or federal
contractor.
Disclosure 1 of 12
Reporting Source: Regulator
Current Status: Final
Allegations: ON 09/16/2021, THE OFFICE OF FINANCIAL REGULATION ("OFFICE")
ENTERED A FINAL ORDER ADOPTING THE STIPULATION AND CONSENT

AGREEMENT IN THE MATTER OF WESTPARK CAPITAL, LLC ("WESTPARK")
THE CHIEF COMPLIANCE OFFICER (PERIODS COVERING JANUARY 1, 2016
TO MAY 8, 2019). WESTPARK NEITHER ADMITTED NOR DENIED THE
FINDINGS BUT CONSENTED TO THE ENTRY OF FINDINGS BY THE OFFICE.
THE OFFICE FOUND THAT WESTPARK A.) FAILED TO DOCUMENT THE
REQUIRED APPROVAL OF SUITABILITY DURING THE EXAM PERIOD OF
JANUARY 1, 2016 THROUGH MAY 8, 2019, B.) FAILED TO ADEQUATELY
DEMONSTRATE WITH SPECIFICITY THAT IT ADHERED TO THEIR SPMS
REGARDING A REVIEW OF THE "CHECKS REC. & FORWARDED BLOTTER"
DURING THE 2018 INSPECTION AND C.) FAILED TO TIMELY DISCLOSE A
CUSTOMER'S COMPLAINT ON THE REGISTERED REPRESENTATIVE'S FORM
U4.
Initiated By: FLORIDA OFFICE OF FINANCIAL REGULATION ("OFFICE")
Date Initiated: 09/16/2021
Docket/Case Number: 96014-S
URL for Regulatory Action:
Principal Product Type: No Product
Other Product Type(s):
Principal Sanction(s)/Relief Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Sought:
Other Sanction(s)/Relief
Sought:
Resolution: Order
Resolution Date: 09/16/2021
Does the order constitute a No
final order based on
violations of any laws or
regulations that prohibit
fraudulent, manipulative, or
deceptive conduct?
Sanctions Ordered: Monetary/Fine $10,000.00
Cease and Desist/Injunction
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction Details: ON 09/16/2021, THE OFFICE ENTERED A FINAL ORDER ADOPTING THE
STIPULATION AND CONSENT AGREEMENT WHEREBY WESTPARK NEITHER
ADMITTED NOR DENIED THE OFFICE'S FINDINGS BUT AGREED TO CEASE
AND DESIST FROM FUTURE VIOLATIONS OF CHAPTER 517, F.S. AND TO
PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE OF $10,000.00.WESTPARK SHALL BE JOINTLY
ON 09/16/2021, THE OFFICE ENTERED A FINAL ORDER ADOPTING THE

STIPULATION AND CONSENT AGREEMENT WHEREBY WESTPARK NEITHER
ADMITTED NOR DENIED THE OFFICE'S FINDINGS BUT AGREED TO CEASE
AND DESIST FROM FUTURE VIOLATIONS OF CHAPTER 517, F.S. AND TO
PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE OF $10,000.00.WESTPARK SHALL BE JOINTLY
AND SEVERALLY LIABLE FOR PAYMENT OF THE FINE.
i
Disclosure 2 of 12
Allegations: WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, THE FIRM CONSENTED
TO THE SANCTIONS AND TO THE ENTRY OF FINDINGS THAT IT REPORTED
ROES WITH INACCURATE REPORTING EXCEPTION CODES, INACCURATE
ORDER RECEIPT TIMES, INACCURATE CAPACITY CODES, AND/OR
INACCURATE ACCOUNT TYPE CODES. THE FINDINGS STATED THAT THE
FIRM ALSO TRANSMITTED ROES TO OATS THAT SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN
SUBMITTED TO OATS. THE FINDINGS ALSO STATED THAT THE FIRM
PROVIDED WRITTEN NOTIFICATION TO CUSTOMERS THAT DISCLOSED ITS
INACCURATE CAPACITY. SPECIFICALLY, THE FIRM DISCLOSED
INACCURATE CAPACITY CODES OF PRINCIPAL FOR ORDERS THAT WERE
EXECUTED IN AN AGENCY CAPACITY FOR TRADES THAT WERE BOOKED
INTO THE FIRM'S INVENTORY ACCOUNT. THE FINDINGS ALSO INCLUDED
THAT THE FIRM FAILED TO ESTABLISH AND MAINTAIN A SUPERVISORY
SYSTEM, INCLUDING WSPS, REASONABLY DESIGNED TO ACHIEVE
COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SEC AND FINRA RULES REGARDING OATS
REPORTING AND DISCLOSURE ON CUSTOMER CONFIRMATIONS. THE FIRM
'S SUPERVISORY SYSTEM, INCLUDING ITS WSPS, DID NOT INCLUDE A
REVIEW OF THE ACCURACY OF INFORMATION IT SUBMITTED TO OATS.
ONCE IMPLEMENTED, THE FIRM'S SUPERVISORY SYSTEM RELIED ON
REVIEWS THAT WOULD NOT HAVE DETECTED THE MAJORITY OF THE
INSTANCES WHERE THE FIRM SUBMITTED INACCURATE OR IMPROPER
ORDER INFORMATION TO OATS. ADDITIONALLY, THE FIRM'S WSPS
PERTAINING TO CUSTOMER CONFIRMATIONS NOTED THAT IT WOULD
REVIEW THE CLEARING FIRM CONFIRMATIONS TO ENSURE THAT THE
PROPER DISCLOSURES APPEARED ON THE CONFIRMATIONS, BUT IT DID
NOT INCLUDE A REVIEW TO DETERMINE IF THE DISCLOSURES WERE
ACCURATE.
Initiated By: FINRA
Docket/Case Number: 2015047727501
Principal Product Type: Other

Other Product Type(s): UNSPECIFIED SECURITIES
Principal Sanction(s)/Relief
Sought:
Sought:
Sought:
Resolution: Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)

deceptive conduct?
Sanctions Ordered: Censure
Monetary/Fine $30,000.00
Sanction Details: THE FIRM WAS CENSURED AND FINED $30,000. FINES PAID IN FULL ON
JULY 2, 2020.
i
Reporting Source: Firm
TO THE SANCTIONS AND TO THE ENTRY OF FINDINGS THAT IT REPORTED
ROES WITH INACCURATE REPORTING EXCEPTION CODES, INACCURATE
ORDER RECEIPT TIMES, INACCURATE CAPACITY CODES, AND/OR
INACCURATE ACCOUNT TYPE CODES. THE FINDINGS STATED THAT THE
FIRM ALSO TRANSMITTED ROES TO OATS THAT SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN
SUBMITTED TO OATS. THE FINDINGS ALSO STATED THAT THE FIRM
PROVIDED WRITTEN NOTIFICATION TO CUSTOMERS THAT DISCLOSED ITS
INACCURATE CAPACITY. SPECIFICALLY, THE FIRM DISCLOSED
INACCURATE CAPACITY CODES OF PRINCIPAL FOR ORDERS THAT WERE
EXECUTED IN AN AGENCY CAPACITY FOR TRADES THAT WERE BOOKED
INTO THE FIRM'S INVENTORY ACCOUNT. THE FINDINGS ALSO INCLUDED
THAT THE FIRM FAILED TO ESTABLISH AND MAINTAIN A SUPERVISORY
SYSTEM, INCLUDING WSPS, REASONABLY DESIGNED TO ACHIEVE
COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SEC AND FINRA RULES REGARDING OATS
©2021 FINRA. All rights reserved. Report about
ORDERWESTPARK CAPITAL, INC.
INFORMATION TO OATS. ADDITIONALLY, THE FIRM'S WSPS 18
ORDER INFORMATION TO OATS. ADDITIONALLY, THE FIRM'S WSPS
REVIEW THE CLEARING FIRM CONFIRMATIONS TO ENSURE THAT THE
PROPER DISCLOSURES APPEARED ON THE CONFIRMATIONS, BUT IT DID
NOT INCLUDE A REVIEW TO DETERMINE IF THE DISCLOSURES WERE
ACCURATE.
Initiated By: FINRA

Other Product Type(s): UNSPECIFIED SECURITIES
Sought:
Sought:

Sanction Details: THE FIRM WAS CENSURED AND FINED $30,000.
i
Disclosure 3 of 12
TO THE SANCTIONS AND TO THE ENTRY OF FINDINGS THAT IT FAILED TO
ESTABLISH AND MAINTAIN A SYSTEM OF SUPERVISION REASONABLY
DESIGNED TO SUPERVISE ITS BUSINESS IN COLLATERALIZED MORTGAGE
OBLIGATIONS (CMOS). THE FINDINGS STATED THAT THE FIRM'S WSPS DID
NOT ADDRESS CMO SUITABILITY, RISK FACTORS, RECOMMENDATIONS OR
SUPERVISION, AND THEREFORE, PROVIDED INSUFFICIENT GUIDANCE.
WESTPARK'S WSPS ALSO FAILED TO ADEQUATELY SPECIFY THAT
EDUCATIONAL MATERIALS MUST BE OFFERED TO CUSTOMERS PRIOR TO
THE PURCHASE OF CMOS. CONSEQUENTLY, THE FIRM'S SYSTEM OF
SUPERVISION, INCLUDING ITS WSPS, WAS NOT REASONABLY DESIGNED
TO ACHIEVE COMPLIANCE WITH THE APPLICABLE SECURITIES LAWS,
REGULATIONS AND RULES GOVERNING THIS LINE OF THE FIRM'S
BUSINESS. IN ADDITION, THE FIRM'S SUPERVISION AND COMPLIANCE
STAFF HAD A LIMITED AND INSUFFICIENT OVERALL UNDERSTANDING OF
CMOS. THE FINDINGS ALSO STATED THAT THE FIRM FAILED TO
ADEQUATELY IMPLEMENT ITS WRITTEN PROCEDURES. THE FIRM SHOULD
HAVE EVALUATED CMOS PRIOR TO ANY RECOMMENDATIONS OR SALES,
YET IT CONDUCTED NO REVIEW OR ANALYSIS OF CMOS PRIOR TO
PERMITTING ITS REPRESENTATIVES TO SELL CMOS THAT ADDRESSED
THE CRITERIA AND CONSIDERATIONS IDENTIFIED IN ITS WSPS. THE FIRM
ALSO TOOK NO STEPS TO ENSURE PRODUCT KNOWLEDGE OR OFFER
TRAINING TO FIRM REPRESENTATIVES AND SUPERVISORS ON CMOS, OR
TO INCREASE SCRUTINY OF THE SUITABILITY OF SUCH PRODUCTS, AS
OUTLINED IN ITS WSPS. AS A RESULT, THE FIRM FAILED TO FOLLOW ITS
OWN WRITTEN PROCEDURES CONCERNING THE APPROVAL AND
SUPERVISION OF COMPLEX PRODUCTS IN CONNECTION WITH ITS SALES
OF CMOS. IN ADDITION, THE FIRM'S HEIGHTENED SUPERVISION WAS
LIMITED TO GENERIC TOPICS, WHICH WERE FREQUENTLY DISMISSED BY
IT AS INAPPLICABLE. THIS APPROACH WAS UNREASONABLE. THE
FINDINGS ALSO INCLUDED THAT THE FIRM FAILED TO OFFER CMO
EDUCATIONAL MATERIALS TO RETAIL INVESTORS PRIOR TO THEIR FIRST
CMO PURCHASES MADE. THE FIRM DID NOT HAVE ADEQUATE WSPS IN
PLACE THAT MADE CLEAR THIS REQUIREMENT OR DESIGNATED
RESPONSIBILITY FOR ENSURING THE OFFERING OF SUCH MATERIALS.
CONSEQUENTLY, THE FIRM TOOK INADEQUATE STEPS TO ENSURE THAT
SUCH MATERIALS WERE OFFERED. INSTEAD, THE CUSTOMERS WHO
PURCHASED CMOS WERE SENT MATERIALS, ONLY AFTER THEIR FIRST
PURCHASES, BY THE FIRM'S CLEARING FIRM.
Initiated By: FINRA

Other Product Type(s): N/A
Principal Sanction(s)/Relief Other
Sought:
Other Sanction(s)/Relief N/A
Sought:

Does FINRA.
©2021 the order constitute
All rights reserved. aReport about
No WESTPARK CAPITAL, INC. 20

deceptive conduct?
Sanction Details: THE FIRM WAS CENSURED AND FINED $27,500. FINES PAID IN FULL ON
JANUARY 9, 2018.
i
TO THE SANCTIONS AND TO THE ENTRY OF FINDINGS THAT IT FAILED TO
ESTABLISH AND MAINTAIN A SYSTEM OF SUPERVISION REASONABLY
DESIGNED TO SUPERVISE ITS BUSINESS IN COLLATERALIZED MORTGAGE
OBLIGATIONS (CMOS). THE FINDINGS STATED THAT THE FIRM'S WSPS DID
REGULATIONS AND RULES GOVERNING THIS LINE OF THE FIRM'S
BUSINESS. IN ADDITION, THE FIRM'S SUPERVISION AND COMPLIANCE
STAFF HAD A LIMITED AND INSUFFICIENT OVERALL UNDERSTANDING OF
CMOS. THE FINDINGS ALSO STATED THAT THE FIRM FAILED TO
ADEQUATELY IMPLEMENT ITS WRITTEN PROCEDURES. THE FIRM SHOULD
HAVE EVALUATED CMOS PRIOR TO ANY RECOMMENDATIONS OR SALES,
YET IT CONDUCTED NO REVIEW OR ANALYSIS OF CMOS PRIOR TO
PERMITTING ITS REPRESENTATIVES TO SELL CMOS THAT ADDRESSED
THE CRITERIA AND CONSIDERATIONS IDENTIFIED IN ITS WSPS. THE FIRM
ALSO TOOK NO STEPS TO ENSURE PRODUCT KNOWLEDGE OR OFFER
TRAINING TO FIRM REPRESENTATIVES AND SUPERVISORS ON CMOS, OR
©2021 FINRA. All rights reserved. LIMITED
Report about TO GENERIC
WESTPARK TOPICS, WHICH WERE FREQUENTLY DISMISSED BY
CAPITAL, INC. 21
LIMITED TO GENERIC TOPICS, WHICH WERE FREQUENTLY DISMISSED BY
FINDINGS ALSO INCLUDED THAT THE FIRM FAILED TO OFFER CMO
EDUCATIONAL MATERIALS TO RETAIL INVESTORS PRIOR TO THEIR FIRST
CMO PURCHASES MADE. THE FIRM DID NOT HAVE ADEQUATE WSPS IN
PLACE THAT MADE CLEAR THIS REQUIREMENT OR DESIGNATED
RESPONSIBILITY FOR ENSURING THE OFFERING OF SUCH MATERIALS.
CONSEQUENTLY, THE FIRM TOOK INADEQUATE STEPS TO ENSURE THAT
SUCH MATERIALS WERE OFFERED. INSTEAD, THE CUSTOMERS WHO
PURCHASED CMOS WERE SENT MATERIALS, ONLY AFTER THEIR FIRST
PURCHASES, BY THE FIRM'S CLEARING FIRM.
Initiated By: FINRA

Other Product Type(s): N/A
Sought:
Sought:

Sanction Details: THE FIRM WAS CENSURED AND FINED $27,500.
i
Disclosure 4 of 12
Allegations: RESPONDENTS FILED AN INCOMPLETE APPLICATION FOR REGISTRATION
AND FAILED TO PROMPTLY UPDATE APPLICATION INFORMATION THAT HAD
BECOME INACCURATE, IN VIOLATION OF 409.4-412(D)(1) AND 409.4-406(B)
Initiated By: MISSOURI
Docket/Case Number: AP-17-02

URL for Regulatory Action: HTTP://WWW.SOS.MO.GOV/CMSIMAGES/SECURITIES/AP-17-
02CONSENTORDER.PDF
Principal Sanction(s)/Relief Censure
Sought:
Other Sanction(s)/Relief $25,000 PAID TO INVESTOR EDUCATION AND PROTECTION FUND
Sought: JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY
Resolution: Consent
deceptive conduct?
Sanction Details: PERMANENTLY ENJOINED AND RESTRAINED FROM VIOLATING 409.4-412
AND 409.4-406.
SHALL MAINTAIN AND ENFORCE WSP.
RESPONDENTS PAYMENT OF $7,000 IS SUSPENDED, IF $18,000 IS PAID ON
SCHEDULE
i
Allegations: RESPONDENTS FILED AN INCOMPLETE APPLICATION FOR REGISTRATION
AND FAILED TO PROMPTLY UPDATE APPLICATION INFORMATION THAT HAD
BECOME INACCURATE, IN VIOLATION OF 409.4-412(D)(1) AND 409.4-406(B)
Initiated By: MISSOURI
Docket/Case Number: AP-17-02


Sought:
Other Sanction(s)/Relief $25,000 PAID TO INVESTOR EDUCATION AND PROTECTION FUND JOINTLY
Sought: AND SEVERALLY
Resolution: Consent
Sanction Details: PERMANENTLY ENJOINED AND RESTRAINED FROM VIOLATING 409.4-412
AND 409.4-406. SHALL MAINTAIN AND ENFORCE WSP. RESPONDENTS
PAYMENT OF $7,000 IS SUSPENDED, IF $18,000 IS PAID ON SCHEDULE
i
Disclosure 5 of 12
Allegations: WESTPARK ALLOWED AN INDIVIDUAL TO CONTINUE TO ACT AS AN AGENT
IN CONNECTION WITH THE PURCHASE AND SALE OF SECURITIES TO
CERTAIN NEW JERSEY RESIDENTS AFTER HIS REGISTRATION WAS
REVOKED. WESTPARK FAILED TO FOLLOW ITS OWN WRITTEN
SUPERVISORY PROCEDURES REGARDING ADDRESS
CHANGES. WESTPARK FAILED TO REASONABLY SUPERVISE AN AGENT TO
DETECT AND PREVENT HIS UNREGISTERED ACTIVITIES IN NEW JERSEY.
Initiated By: NEW JERSEY BUREAU OF SECURITIES
Docket/Case Number: N/A
Sought:
Sought:
Resolution: Consent
Resolution: Consent
deceptive conduct?
Other Sanctions Ordered: 1. PRIOR TO THE ENTRY OF THIS CONSENT ORDER, WESTPARK RETAINED
THE COMPLIANCE CONSULTANT TO PROVIDE A REVIEW OF WESTPARK'S
COMPLIANCE AND SUPERVISORY SYSTEM AND TO PROVIDE COMPLIANCE
AND SUPERVISORY SUPPORT. WESTPARK SHALL CONTINUE TO RETAIN
THIS OR ANOTHER COMPLIANCE CONSULTANT, NOT OBJECTIONABLE TO
THE BUREAU TO PROVIDE THE SERVICES DESCRIBED FOR NO LESS THAN
TWO YEARS FROM THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, UNLESS OTHERWISE
ORDERED BY THE BUREAU; AND FURTHER
2. IN THE EVENT THAT THE COMPLIANCE CONSULTANT IS NO LONGER
RETAINED BY WESTPARK, WESTPARK WILL NOTIFY THE BUREAU WITHIN
TEN BUSINESS DAYS OF THE TERMINATION AND PROVIDE THE
NAME OF THE NEW COMPLIANCE CONSULTANT; AND FURTHER
3. WESTPARK SHALL RETAIN THE SERVICES OF A NEW JERSEY
CONSULTANT, NOT OBJECTIONABLE TO THE BUREAU TO REVIEW AND
REPORT ON THE NEW JERSEY SALES AND SUPERVISORY ACTIVITIES FOR
A PERIOD OF NOT LESS THAN TWO YEARS FROM THE DATE OF THIS
ORDER, UNLESS OTHERWISE ORDERED BY THE BUREAU; AND FURTHER
4. IN THE EVENT THAT THE NEW JERSEY CONSULTANT IS NO LONGER
RETAINED BY WESTPARK, ESTPARK WILL NOTIFY THE BUREAU WITHIN
FIVE BUSINESS DAYS OF THE TERMINATION AND PROVIDE THE AME OF
THE PROPOSED NEW JERSEY CONSULTANT, NOT OBJECTIONABLE TO THE
BUREAU; AND FURTHER
5. WESTPARK SHALL MAINTAIN FOR TEN (10) YEARS COPIES OF ALL
RECOMMENDATIONS, REPORTS O OTHER CORRESPONDENCE FROM
BOTH THE COMPLIANCE CONSULTANT AND THE NJ CONSULTANT AND
SHALL PROVIDE SUCH COPIES UPON REQUEST FROM ANY SECURITIES
REGULATOR.
Sanction Details: WESTPARK CAPITAL, INC. IS HEREBY ASSESSED A CIVIL MONETARY
PENALTY IN THE AMOUNT OF $50,000 OF WHICH $20,000 IS PERMANENTLY
SUSPENDED.
Regulator Statement WESTPARK CAPITAL PERMITTED A BROKER TO CONDUCT FINANCIAL
TRANSACTIONS FOR NEW JERSEY RESIDENTS WHEN HE WAS NOT
REGISTERED WITH THE BUREAU AS AN AGENT OF WESTPARK CAPITAL.
SPECIFICALLY, THE AGENT CONDUCTED FINANCIAL TRANSACTIONS FOR
©2021 FINRA. All rights reserved. UP TO
Report about FOUR NEW
WESTPARK JERSEY
CAPITAL, INC. RESIDENTS AFTER HIS REGISTRATION WAS 25
REVOKED BY THE BUREAU IN MAY 2008. THE AGENT CAUSED THESE NEW
WESTPARK CAPITAL PERMITTED A BROKER TO CONDUCT FINANCIAL

TRANSACTIONS FOR NEW JERSEY RESIDENTS WHEN HE WAS NOT
REGISTERED WITH THE BUREAU AS AN AGENT OF WESTPARK CAPITAL.
SPECIFICALLY, THE AGENT CONDUCTED FINANCIAL TRANSACTIONS FOR
UP TO FOUR NEW JERSEY RESIDENTS AFTER HIS REGISTRATION WAS
REVOKED BY THE BUREAU IN MAY 2008. THE AGENT CAUSED THESE NEW
JERSEY CLIENTS TO CHANGE THEIR ADDRESSES FROM THEIR ACTUAL
ADDRESSES IN NEW JERSEY TO EITHER A BUSINESS ADDRESS OR A POST
OFFICE BOX LOCATED IN NEW YORK. THE AGENT CAUSED THESE
ADDRESS CHANGES, IN VIOLATION OF WESTPARK CAPITAL'S OPERATING
POLICIES, IN ORDER TO CONTINUE TO DO BUSINESS WITH THEM
WITHOUT BEING REGISTERED IN NEW JERSEY.
i
Allegations: THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY ALLEGED THAT REPRESENTATIVE HARRY
DATYS CONTINUED TO CONDUCT BUSINESS WITH NEW JERSEY
RESIDENTS BETWEEN MAY 15 2008 - AUGUEST 2012 AFTER THE BEREU
REVOKED HIS REGISTRATION
Docket/Case Number:

Other Product Type(s): ORDER DID NOT PERTAIN TO CERTAIN PRODUCT TYPES
Sought:
Sought:
Resolution: Consent
Other Sanctions Ordered: 1. PRIOR TO THE ENTRY OF THIS CONSENT ORDER, WESTPARK RETAINED
THE COMPLIANCE CONSULTANT TO PROVIDE A REVIEW OF WESTPARK'S
COMPLIANCE AND SUPERVISORY SYSTEM AND TO PROVIDE COMPLIANCE
AND SUPERVISORY SUPPORT. WESTPARK SHALL CONTINUE TO RETAIN
ORDERED BY THE BUREAU; AND FURTHER 2. IN THE EVENT THAT THE
COMPLIANCE CONSULTANT IS NO LONGER RETAINED BY WESTPARK,
©2021 FINRA. All rights reserved. WESTPARK
Report about WILL
WESTPARK NOTIFY
CAPITAL, INC. THE BUREAU WITHIN TEN BUSINESS DAYS OF 26
THE TERMINATION AND PROVIDE THE NAME OF THE NEW COMPLIANCE
ORDERED BY THE BUREAU; AND FURTHER 2. IN THE EVENT THAT THE
COMPLIANCE CONSULTANT IS NO LONGER RETAINED BY WESTPARK,
WESTPARK WILL NOTIFY THE BUREAU WITHIN TEN BUSINESS DAYS OF
THE TERMINATION AND PROVIDE THE NAME OF THE NEW COMPLIANCE
CONSULTANT; AND FURTHER 3. WESTPARK SHALL RETAIN THE SERVICES
OF A NEW JERSEY CONSULTANT, NOT OBJECTIONABLE TO THE BUREAU
TO REVIEW AND REPORT ON THE NEW JERSEY SALES AND SUPERVISORY
ACTIVITIES FOR A PERIOD OF NOT LESS THAN TWO YEARS FROM THE
DATE OF THIS ORDER, UNLESS OTHERWISE ORDERED BY THE BUREAU;
AND FURTHER 4. IN THE EVENT THAT THE NEW JERSEY CONSULTANT IS
NO LONGER RETAINED BY WESTPARK, ESTPARK WILL NOTIFY THE
BUREAU WITHIN FIVE BUSINESS DAYS OF THE TERMINATION AND
PROVIDE THE AME OF THE PROPOSED NEW JERSEY CONSULTANT, NOT
OBJECTIONABLE TO THE BUREAU; AND FURTHER 5. WESTPARK SHALL
MAINTAIN FOR TEN (10) YEARS COPIES OF ALL RECOMMENDATIONS,
REPORTS O OTHER CORRESPONDENCE FROM BOTH THE COMPLIANCE
CONSULTANT AND THE NJ CONSULTANT AND SHALL PROVIDE SUCH
COPIES UPON REQUEST FROM ANY SECURITIES REGULATOR.
Sanction Details: CONSENT ORDER, WHICH PROVIDED FOR THE PAYMENT OF A FINE OF
$50,000 ON 03/24/2014 IN WHICH $20,000 WAS WAIVED DUE TO THE FIRMS
COOPERATION .
Firm Statement THE NEW JERSEY BUREAU OF SECURITIES INITIATED DISCUSSIONS WITH
THE FIRM IN MAY 2012 REGARDING SALES ACTIVITIES OF A REGISTERED
REPRESENTATIVE (FROM 2008-2012). SUCH ACTIVITIES INVOLVED
CERTAIN NEW JERSEY RESIDENTS WHO ALSO HAD ADDRESSES IN NEW
YORK. THE RESULT OF THOSE DISCUSSIONS WAS THE FIRM AGREED TO
ENTER INTO A CONSENT ORDER, WHICH PROVIDED FOR THE PAYMENT OF
A FINE OF $50,000 IN WHICH $20,000 WAS WAIVED DUE TO THE FIRMS
COOPERATION. EXTENDED LIMITED AUTHORIZATIONS FOR THE
REGISTERED REPRESENTATIVE TO CONTINUE TO TRANSACT BUSINESS
WITH CERTAIN NEW JERSEY RESIDENTS WHO HAVE ADDRESSES IN NEW
YORK WITHOUT REGISTRATION AS AN AGENT IN THE STATE OF NEW
JERSEY, AS LONG AS THE COMMUNICATION TAKES PLACE WHILE THE
CLIENT IS NOT IN THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY.
i
Disclosure 6 of 12
AND WILLIAM A MORGAN ("MORGAN")THE CHIEF COMPLIANCE OFFICER
(PERIODS COVERING NOVEMBER 2005 TO SEPTEMBER 2008) AND ANTI
MONEY LAUNDERING ("AML") PROGRAM SUPERVISOR (PERIODS
COVERING MARCH 2006 THROUGH OCTOBER 2007). WESTPARK AND
MORGAN NEITHER ADMITTED NOR DENIED THE FINDINGS BUT
AND WILLIAM A MORGAN ("MORGAN")THE CHIEF COMPLIANCE OFFICER
(PERIODS COVERING NOVEMBER 2005 TO SEPTEMBER 2008) AND ANTI
COVERING MARCH 2006 THROUGH OCTOBER 2007). WESTPARK AND
CONSENTED TO THE ENTRY OF FINDINGS BY THE OFFICE. THE OFFICE
FOUND THAT WESTPARK A.) FAILED TO MAINTAIN ALL REQUIRED BOOKS
AND RECORDS DURING THE EXAM PERIOD OF JUNE 1, 2006 THROUGH
DECEMBER 31, 2007 AND B.) WESTPARK AND MORGAN FAILED TO
IMPLEMENT THE FIRM'S AML COMPLIANCE PROGRAM, FAILED TO
MONITOR AND ANALYZE POTENTIALLY SUSPICIOUS TRANSACTIONS, AND
FAILED TO PROPERLY IMPLEMENT THE INDEPENDENT ANNUAL AUDIT OF
THE FIRM'S AML.
Initiated By: FLORIDA OFFICE OF FINANCIAL REGULATION ("OFFICE")
Docket/Case Number: 0483-S-4/10
Sought:
Sought:
Resolution: Order
deceptive conduct?
STIPULATION AND CONSENT AGREEMENT WHEREBY WESTPARK AND
MORGAN NEITHER ADMITTED NOR DENIED THE OFFICE'S FINDINGS BUT
AGREED TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM FUTURE VIOLATIONS OF CHAPTER
517, F.S. AND TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE OF $59,125.00.WESTPARK
AND MORGAN SHALL BE JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY LIABLE FOR PAYMENT
OF THE FINE.
i
AND WILLIAM A MORGAN ("MORGAN") THE CHIEF COMPLIANCE OFFICER
(PERIODS COVERING NOVEMBER 2005 TO SEPTEMEBER 2008) AND ANTI
COVERING MARCH 2006 THROUGH OCTOBER 2007)WESTPARK AND
CONSENTED TO THE ENTRY OF FINDINGS BY THE OFFICE. THE OFFICE
FOUND THAT WESTPARK A.) FAILED TO MAINTAIN ALL REQUIRED BOOKS
AND RECORDS DURING THE EXAM PERIOD OF JUNE 1, 2006 THROUGH
DECEMBER 31, 2007 AND B.) WESTPARK AND MORGAN FAILED TO
IMPLEMENT THE FIRMS AML COMPLIANCE PROGRAM, FAILED TO MONITOR
AND ANALYZE POTENTIALLY SUSPICIOUS TRANSACTIONS, AND FAILED TO
PROPERLY IMPLEMENT THE INDEPENDENT ANNUAL AUDIT OF THE FIRM'S
AML.
Initiated By: FLORIDA OFFICE OF FINANCIAL REGULATION
Docket/Case Number: 0483-S-4/10

Sought:
Sought:
Resolution: Order
MORGAN NEITHER ADMITTED NOR DENIED THE OFFICE'S FINDING BUT
517, F.S. AND TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE OF $59,125.00 WESTPARK
©2021 FINRA. All rights reserved. ANDWESTPARK
Report about MORGANCAPITAL,
SHALL INC.
BE JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY LIABLE FOR PAYMENT 29
OF THE FINE.
ON 06/15/2012, THE OFFICE ENTERED A FINAL ORDER ADOPTING THE
MORGAN NEITHER ADMITTED NOR DENIED THE OFFICE'S FINDING BUT
517, F.S. AND TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE OF $59,125.00 WESTPARK
AND MORGAN SHALL BE JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY LIABLE FOR PAYMENT
OF THE FINE.
i
Disclosure 7 of 12
Allegations: WESTPARK CAPITAL, INC. FAILED TO PAY ARBITRATION FEES ASSESSED IN
FINRA ARBITRATION CASE 09-04244.
Initiated By: FINRA
Docket/Case Number: 09-04244

Principal Sanction(s)/Relief Suspension
Sought:
Sought:
Resolution: Other
deceptive conduct?
Sanctions Ordered: Suspension
Sanction Details: PURSUANT TO FINRA RULE 9553, RESPONDENT WESTPARK CAPITAL'S
FINRA MEMBERSHIP IS SUSPENDED AS OF OCTOBER 21, 2011 FOR
FAILURE TO PAY ARBITRATION FEES. SUSPENSION LIFTED OCTOBER 31,
2011.
i

Allegations: THE FIRM WAS SUSPENDED FOR FAILURE TO PAY FINRA ARBITRATION
FEES PRIOR TO THE STATED DUE DATE OF 10/21/2011. ONCE PAYMENT
WAS RECEIVED BY FINRA ON 10/31/2011 THE SUSPENSION WAS LIFTED.
Initiated By: FINRA

Other Product Type(s): ARBITRATION FEES
Principal Sanction(s)/Relief Suspension
Sought:
Sought:
Resolution: Other
Sanctions Ordered: Suspension
Sanction Details: THE FIRM WAS SUSPENDED FOR FAILURE TO PAY FINRA ARBITRATION
FEES PRIOR TO THE STATED DUE DATE OF 10/21/2011. PAYMENT WAS
SENT BUT NOT RECEIVED. ONCE PAYMENT WAS RECEIVED BY FINRA ON
10/31/2011 THE SUSPENSION WAS LIFTED.
Firm Statement THE FIRM WAS SUSPENDED FOR FAILURE TO PAY FINRA ARBITRATION
FEES PRIOR TO THE STATED DUE DATE OF 10/21/2011. PAYMENT WAS
SENT BUT NOT RECEIVED. ONCE PAYMENT WAS RECEIVED BY FINRA ON
10/31/2011 THE SUSPENSION WAS LIFTED.
i
Disclosure 8 of 12
Allegations: NASD RULES 2110, 3010(A): THE FIRM, ACTING THROUGH REGISTERED
PRINCIPALS, FAILED TO ESTABLISH AND MAINTAIN A SUPERVISORY
SYSTEM REASONABLY DESIGNED TO ACHIEVE COMPLIANCE WITH
APPLICABLE RULES AND REGULATIONS. THE DEFICIENT SUPERVISORY
SYSTEM LED TO THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCIES: INADEQUATE
HEIGHTENED SUPERVISION; INADEQUATE MONITORING FOR UNSUITABLY
©2021 FINRA. All rights reserved. EXCESSIVE
Report about TRADING;
WESTPARK NO SYSTEM FOR ANALYZING FAIRNESS OF
CAPITAL, INC. 31
MARKUPS; AND UNQUALIFIED SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL.
APPLICABLE RULES AND REGULATIONS. THE DEFICIENT SUPERVISORY
EXCESSIVE TRADING; NO SYSTEM FOR ANALYZING FAIRNESS OF
MARKUPS; AND UNQUALIFIED SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL.
Initiated By: FINRA

Principal Sanction(s)/Relief Other
Sought:
Sought:

deceptive conduct?
Disgorgement/Restitution
Sanction Details: WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, THE FIRM CONSENTED
TO THE DESCRIBED SANCTIONS AND TO THE ENTRY OF FINDINGS,
THEREFORE THE FIRM IS CENSURED, FINED $100,000 AND ORDERED TO
PAY PARTIAL RESTITUTION IN THE AMOUNT OF $300,000 TO CUSTOMERS.
SATISFACTORY PROOF OF PAYMENT OF THE RESTITUTION, OR OF
REASONABLE AND DOCUMENTED EFFORTS UNDERTAKEN TO EFFECT
RESTITUTION, SHALL BE FORWARDED TO FINRA NO LATER THAN 120 DAYS
AFTER ACCEPTANCE OF THE AWC. IF FOR ANY REASON RESPONDENT
CANNOT LOCATE ANY CUSTOMER AFTER REASONABLE AND
DOCUMENTED EFFORTS WITHIN 120 DAYS FROM THE DATE THE AWC IS
ACCEPTED, RESPONDENT SHALL FORWARD ANY UNDISTRIBUTED
RESTITUTION AND INTEREST TO THE APPROPRIATE ESCHEAT, UNCLAIMED
PROPERTY OR ABANDONED PROPERTY FUNDS FOR THE STATE IN WHICH
THE CUSTOMER IS LAST TO HAVE RESIDED.
i
Allegations: ALLEGATIONS DESCRIBED IN FINRA REGULATORY ACTION CASE #
2007007400504 U6 FILING OCCURRENCE ID # 1503440. VIOLATION OF
NASD RULES 210, 3010(A): THE FIRM ACTING THROUGH REGISTERED
APPLICAPBLE RULES AND REGULATIONS. THE DEFICIENT SUPERVISORY
EXCESSIVE TRADING; NO SYSTEM FOR ANALYZING OF MARKUPS; AND
QUALIFIED SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL.
Initiated By: FINRA

Sought:
Other Sanction(s)/Relief ADMINISTRATIVE FINE
Sought: RESTITUTION

Disgorgement/Restitution
Sanction Details: ADMINSTRATIVE FINE OF $100,000 PAID ON 04/14/2010.
RESTITUTION OF $300000.00 TO BE PAID BY 09/30/2010.
Firm Statement WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, WESTPARK CAPITAL
AGREED TO THE TERMS OF THE AWC NOTICE.
i
Disclosure 9 of 12

Allegations: WESTPARK VIOLATED SEVERAL DISCLOSURE NOTIFICATION CLAUSES IN A
HEIGHTENED SUPERVISORY AGREEMENT FOR AN AFFLIATED AGENT.
WESTPARK ALSO FAILED TO NOTIFY THE BUREAU OF SUPERVISORY
PERSONNEL CHANGES FOR THAT AGENT AS REQUIRED BY THE
AGREEMENT.
Docket/Case Number: BOS 09529-2008N
Sought:
Sought:
Resolution: Consent
deceptive conduct?
Sanction Details: WESTPARK FAILED TO NOTIFY THE BUREAU OF SUPERVISORY
PERSONNEL CHANGES FOR AN AGENT ON A HEIGHTENED SUPERVISION,
AND FAILED TO NOTIFY THE BUREAU OF ACTIONS BY THE COLORADO
DIVISION OF SECURITIES, THE CIVIL LITIGATION BY A TEXAS CUSTOMER
OR THE NEW JERSEY CUSTOMER COMPLAINT FOR THE SAME AGENT AS
REQUIRED BY THE AGREEMENT.
i
Allegations:
©2021 FINRA. All rights reserved. WESTPARK
Report about VIOLATED
WESTPARK SEVERAL
DISCLOSURE NOTIFICATION CLAUSES IN A
CAPITAL, INC. 34
HEIGHTENED SUPERVISION AGREEMENT FOR AN AFFILIATED AGENT.
Allegations: WESTPARK VIOLATED SEVERAL DISCLOSURE NOTIFICATION CLAUSES IN A

HEIGHTENED SUPERVISION AGREEMENT FOR AN AFFILIATED AGENT.
WESTPARK ALSO FAILED TO NOTIFY THE NEW JERSEY BUREAU OF
SECURITIES OF SUPERVISORY PERSONAL CHANFGES FOR THAT AGENT
AS REQUIRED BY THE AGREEMENT.
Docket/Case Number:

Sought:
Sought:
Resolution: Order
Sanction Details: WESTPARK FAILED TO NOTIFY THE NEW JERSEY BUREAU OF SECURITIES
OF PERSONAL CHANGES FOE AND AGENT ON A HEIGHTENED SUPERVION
AGREEMENT. IT FAILED TO NOTIFY THE NEW JERSEY BUREAU OF
SECURITIES OF ACTIONS BY THE COLORADO DIVISION OF SECURITIES,
THE CIVIL LITIGATION BY A TEXAS CUSTOMER, OR OF A NEW JERSEY
CUSTOMER COMPLAINT FOR THE AGENT AS REQUIRED BY THE
HEIGHTENED SUPERVION AGREEMENT.
i
Disclosure 10 of 12
Allegations: NASD RULES 2110, 3010(A) AND (B) - RESPONDENT FAILED TO ESTABLISH,
MAINTAIN AND ENFORCE A SUPERVISORY SYSTEM OR WRITTEN
PROCEDURES REASONABLY DESIGNED TO ENSURE THAT AN INDIVIDUAL
DID NOT ACT IN A PRINCIPAL CAPACITY DURING A SUSPENSION PERIOD.
Initiated By: NASD
Docket/Case Number: E022004062801

Sought:
Sought:

deceptive conduct?
THEREFORE, THE FIRM IS CENSURED AND FINED $10,000.
i
Allegations: NASD RULE 2110, 3010(A) AND (B) - RESPONDENT FAILED TO ESTABLISH ,
MAINTAIN AND ENFORCE A SUPERVISORY SYSTEM OR WRITTEN
PROCEDURES REASONABLY DESIGNED TO ENSURE THAT AN INDIVIDUAL
DID NOT ACT IN A PRINCIPAL CAPACITY DURING A SUSPENSION PERIOD IN
2004.
Initiated By: NASD
Docket/Case Number: E022004062801

©2021 FINRA. All rights reserved.
Sought:

Sought:
Sought:

Suspension
THEREFORE, THE FIRM IS CENSURED AND FINED $10,000.
Firm Statement MR. RAPPAPORT CONSENTED TO A 30 DAY SUSPENSION, WHICH WAS
COMPLETED FROM NOVEMBER 6, 2006 THROUGH DECEMBER 5, 2006.
i
Disclosure 11 of 12
Allegations: SEC RULES 17A-3 AND 17A-4, NASD RULES 3110(A), 3110(B)(1), 3370 -
RESPONDENT MEMBER ACCEPTED ORDERS TO SELL SHARES OF STOCK
FROM PUBLIC CUSTOMERS AND FOR EACH ORDER FAILED TO
MAKE/ANNOTATE AN AFFIRMATIVE DETERMINATION THAT THE FIRM
WOULD RECEIVE DELIVERY OF THE SECURITY ON BEHALF OF THE
CUSTOMER OR THAT THE FIRM COULD BORROW THE SECURITY ON
BEHALF OF THE CUSTOMER FOR DELIVERY BY SETTLEMENT DATE;
EXECUTED SHORT SALE ORDERS AND FAILED TO PROPERLY MARK THE
ORDER TICKETS AS SHORT FOR THOSE ORDERS; FAILED TO PRESERVE
FOR A PERIOD OF NOT LESS THAN THREE YEARS THE FIRST TWO IN AN
ACCESSIBLE PLACE, THE MEMORANDUM OF FIVE BROKERAGE ORDERS.
Initiated By: NASD

Other Product Type(s): STOCK
Sought:
Sought:
Sought:

deceptive conduct?
Sanction Details: WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE ALLEGATIONS, WESTPARK
CAPITAL, INC., CONSENTED TO THE DESCRIBED SANCTIONS AND TO THE
ENTRY OF FINDINGS, THEREFORE THE FIRM IS CENSURED AND FINED
$12,500.
i
Allegations: RESPONDENT MEMBER ACCEPTED ORDERS TO SELL SHARES OF STOCK
FROM PUBLIC CUSTOMERS AND FAILED TO ANNOTATE AN AFFIRMATIVE
DETERMINATION THAT THE FIRM WOULD RECEIVE DELIVERY OF THE
SECURITIES ON BEHALF OF THE CUSTOMER OR THAT THE FIRM COULD
BORROW THE SECURITY ON BEHALF OF THE CUSTOMER FOR DELIVERY
BY SETTLEMENT DATE. RESPONDENT MEMBER EXECUTED SHORT SALES
AND FAILED TO PROPERLY MARK THE ORDER TICKETS AS SHORT SALES.
RESPONDENT FAILED TO PRESERVE FIVE (5) ORDER TICKETS FOR THE
REQUIRED 3 YEARS, THE FIRST 2 YEARS IN AN ACCESSIBLE PLACE.
Initiated By: NASD
Principal Product Type: Equity - OTC

Principal
©2021 Sanction(s)/Relief
FINRA. Censure
All rights reserved. Report about WESTPARK CAPITAL, INC. 38
Sought:

Sought:
Other Sanction(s)/Relief MONETARY FINE
Sought:

Sanction Details: WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE ALLEGATIONS,WESTPARK
CAPITAL, INC. CONSENTED TO SANCTIONS. WESTPARK CAPITAL PAID THE
FINE OF $12,500. ON 10-22-2005.
Firm Statement WESTPARK CAPITAL, INC.("WPC") INVESTIGATED THIS MATTER
INTERNALLY PRIOR TO NASD'S INVETIGATION. WPC REPRIMANDED THE
REGISTERED PERSON. WPC UPDATED ITS WRITTEN SUPERVISORY
PROCEDURES TO ELIMINATE ANY LONG SALES UNLESS WESTPARK HAS
PHYSICAL POSSESION OF THE CERTIFICATES. THE REGISTERED PERSON
RESPONSIBLE FOR THIS CONDUCT IS NO LONGER ASSOCIATED WITH
WPC.
i
Disclosure 12 of 12
Allegations: NASD RULES 2110, 2210(B)(1) AND (2), 2210(D)(1)(A) AND (B), 2210(D)(2)(B),
2210(D)(2)(B)(I), 2210(D)(2)(B)(I)(B), 2210(D)(2)(K), 2711(H)(1),(4),(7),(9) AND
(10), 2711(I), 3010 - RESPONDENT MEMBER ISSUED RESEARCH REPORTS
ON OTCBB TRADED ISSUERS THAT OMITTED MATERIAL FACTS AND
QUALIFICATIONS AND DID NOT CONTAIN ADEQUATE DISCLOSURE OF
RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH THE PRICE TARGET AND THE FIRM KNEW OR
HAD REASON TO KNOW THAT THE STATEMENTS AND CLAIMS WERE
UNWARRANTED, EXAGGERATED, FALSE, OR MISLEADING; DID NOT HAVE A
REASONABLE BASIS FOR RECOMMENDING THE ISSUERS AS A "STRONG
BUY" OR "BUY"; ISSUED RESEARCH REPORTS CONTAINING A CHART
COMPARING PRICE STRUCTURES AND TABLES SHOWING PRICE AND
EARNINGS INFORMATION WITHOUT PROVIDING SOURCES FOR THE
CHART AND INFORMATION;ISSUED RESEARCH REPORTS THAT DID NOT
HAVE A REASONABLE BASIS FOR A RECOMMENDATION AS A "STRONG
BUY"; DID NOT HAVE A REASONABLE BASIS FOR A TARGET PRICE, AND
FAILED TO DISCLOSE THAT THE FIRM'S CEO OWNED STOCK AND
©2021 FINRA. All rights reserved.
WARRANTS IN THE ISSUER; ISSUED A RESEARCH REPORT THAT DID NOT
MAKE ALL DISCLOSURES REQUIRED BY NASD AND DID NOT MAKE ALL
EARNINGS INFORMATION WITHOUT PROVIDING SOURCES FOR THE
CHART AND INFORMATION;ISSUED RESEARCH REPORTS THAT DID NOT
HAVE A REASONABLE BASIS FOR A RECOMMENDATION AS A "STRONG
BUY"; DID NOT HAVE A REASONABLE BASIS FOR A TARGET PRICE, AND
FAILED TO DISCLOSE THAT THE FIRM'S CEO OWNED STOCK AND
WARRANTS IN THE ISSUER; ISSUED A RESEARCH REPORT THAT DID NOT
MAKE ALL DISCLOSURES REQUIRED BY NASD AND DID NOT MAKE ALL
DISCLOSURES REQUIRED BY NASD ON THE FRONT PAGE OF THE
RESEARCH REPORT; FAILED TO HAVE A PRINICPAL INITIAL RESEARCH
REPORTS AS EVIDENCE OF SUPERVISORY REVIEW BEFORE THE FIRM
RELEASED THE REPORTS, FAILED TO MANTAIN COPIES OF THE
RESEARCH REPORTS IN SEPARATE FILES; AND FAILED TO ADOPT AND
IMPLEMENT WRITTEN SUPERVISORY PROCEDURES REASONABLY
DESIGNED TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH NASD RULE 2711.
Initiated By: NASD
Docket/Case Number: CAF030062

Other Product Type(s): RESEARCH REPORTS
Sought:
Sought:
Resolution: Decision & Order of Offer of Settlement

Suspension
Other Sanctions Ordered: AGREES TO RETAIN AN INDEPENDENT CONSULTANT, NOT UNACCEPTABLE
TO NASD, TO REVIEW AND MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS CONCERNING THE
ADEQUACY OF ITS CURRENT SUPERVISORY AND OPERATING
PROCEDURES AS THEY RELATE TO THE MATTERS DESCRIBED IN THE
OFFER OF SETTLEMENT, INCLUDING THE ADEQUACY OF ITS
SUPERVISORY PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE ISSURANCE OF
RESEARCH REPORTS BEFORE AGAIN ISSUING RESEARCH REPORTS.
Sanction Details: WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE ALLEGATIONS, THE FIRM
CONSENTED TO THE DESCRIBED SANCTIONS AND TO THE ENTRY OF
FINDINGS, THEREFORE, THE FIRM IS CENSURED, FINED, $50,000, JOINTLY
AND SEVERALLY, SUSPENDED FROM ISSUING RESEARCH REPORTS FOR 6
MONTHS; AGREES TO RETAIN AN INDEPENDENT CONSULTANT, NOT
UNACCEPTABLE TO NASD, TO REVIEW AND MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS
CONCERNING THE ADEQUACY OF ITS CURRENT SUPERVISORY AND
OPERATING PROCEDURES AS THEY RELATE TO THE MATTERS DESCRIBED
IN THE OFFER OF SETTLEMENT, INCLUDING THE ADEQUACY OF ITS
©2021 FINRA. All rights reserved. SUPERVISORY
Report about PROCEDURES
WESTPARK CAPITAL, INC. RELATING TO THE ISSURANCE OF 40
MONTHS; AGREES TO RETAIN AN INDEPENDENT CONSULTANT, NOT
UNACCEPTABLE TO NASD, TO REVIEW AND MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS
CONCERNING THE ADEQUACY OF ITS CURRENT SUPERVISORY AND
OPERATING PROCEDURES AS THEY RELATE TO THE MATTERS DESCRIBED
IN THE OFFER OF SETTLEMENT, INCLUDING THE ADEQUACY OF ITS
SUPERVISORY PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE ISSURANCE OF
SUSPENSION EFFECTIVE AUGUST 16, 2004 TO CLOSE OF BUSINESS
FEBRUARY 15, 2005.
i
Allegations: NASD RULES 2110, 2210(B)(1) AND (2), 2210(D)(1)(A) AND (B), 2210(D)(2)(B),
2210(D)(2)(B)(I), 2210(D)(2)(B)(I)(B), 2210(D)(2)(K), 2711(H)(1),(4),(7),(9) AND
(10), 2711(I), 3010 - RESPONDENT ISSUED RESEARCH REPORTS ON OTCBB
TRADED ISSUERS THAT OMITTED MATERIAL FACTS AND QUALIFICATIONS
AND DID NOT CONTAIN ADEQUATE DISCLOSURE OF RISKS ASSOCIATED
WITH THE PRICE TARGET AND THE FIRM KNEW OR HAD REASON TO KNOW
THAT THE STATEMENTS AND CLAIMS WERE UNWARRANTED,
EXAGGERATED, FALSE, OR MISLEADING; DID NOT HAVE A REASONABLE
BASIS FOR RECOMMENDING THE ISSUERS AS A "STRONG BUY" OR "BUY";
ISSUED RESEARCH REPORTS CONTAINING A CHART COMPARING PRICE
STRUCTURES AND TABLES SHOWING PRICE AND EARNINGS
INFORMATION WITHOUT PROVIDING SOURCES FOR THE CHART AND
INFORMATION;ISSUED RESEARCH REPORTS THAT DID NOT HAVE A
REASONABLE BASIS FOR A RECOMMENDATION AS A "STRONG BUY"; DID
NOT HAVE A REASONABLE BASIS FOR A TARGET PRICE, AND FAILED TO
DISCLOSE THAT HE OWNED STOCK AND WARRANTS IN THE ISSUER;
ISSUED A RESEARCH REPORT THAT DID NOT MAKE ALL DISCLOSURES
REQUIRED BY NASD AND DID NOT MAKE ALL DISCLOSURES REQUIRED BY
NASD ON THE FRONT PAGE OF THE RESEARCH REPORT; FAILED TO HAVE
A PRINICPAL INITIAL RESEARCH REPORTS AS EVIDENCE OF SUPERVISORY
REVIEW BEFORE THE FIRM RELEASED THE REPORTS, FAILED TO MANTAIN
COPIES OF THE RESEARCH REPORTS IN SEPARATE FILES; AND FAILED TO
ADOPT AND IMPLEMENT WRITTEN SUPERVISORY PROCEDURES
REASONABLY DESIGNED TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH NASD RULE 2711.
Initiated By: NASD
Docket/Case Number: CAF030062

Other Product Type(s): RESEARCH REPORTS
Sought:
Other Sanction(s)/Relief CENSURE, SUSPENSION
Sought:
Other Sanction(s)/Relief CENSURE, SUSPENSION

Sought:
Resolution: Decision & Order of Offer of Settlement

Suspension
Other Sanctions Ordered: REQUALIFY AS A SERIES 24
Sanction Details: WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE ALLEGATIONS,FIRM AND
RAPPAPORT CONSENTED TO THE DESCRIBED SANCTIONS AND TO THE
ENTRY OF FINDINGS, THEREFORE THEY ARE FINED $50,000, JOINTLY AND
SEVERALLY. RAPPAPORT WAS SUSPENDED FROM ASSOCIATION WITH ANY
NASD MEMBER AS A SERIES 24 FOR 30 DAYS; AND REQUIRED TO
REQUALIFY AS A SERIES 24. MR. RAPPAPORT SERVED HIS SUASPENSION
FROM AUGUST 16, 2004 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 14, 2004.
Firm Statement AS THE SERIES 24 LICENSE OVERSEEING THE RESEARCH REPORT
FUNCTIONS, I ELECTED TO GO THE LEAST COSTLY ROUTE BY SETTLING
THIS MATTER WITHOUT ADMITTING THE ALLEGATIONS OR DENYING. AS
PART OF THE SETTLEMENT, THE NASD ARRANGEMENT PROHIBITED ME
FROM DISCUSSING THE MERITS OF THIS CASE PUBLICLY OR IN MY U-4.
Arbitration Award - Award / Judgment

Brokerage firms are not required to report arbitration claims filed against them by customers; however, BrokerCheck
provides summary information regarding FINRA arbitration awards involving securities and commodities disputes
between public customers and registered securities firms in this section of the report.
The full text of arbitration awards issued by FINRA is available at www.finra.org/awardsonline.
Disclosure 1 of 2
Type of Event: ARBITRATION
Allegations: ACCOUNT ACTIVITY-BRCH OF FIDUCIARY DT; ACCOUNT RELATED-FAILURE
TO SUPERVISE; ACCOUNT RELATED-MARGIN CALLS; ACCOUNT RELATED-
NEGLIGENCE
Arbitration Forum: FINRA
Case Initiated: 07/21/2009
Case Number: 09-04244
Disputed Product Type: OTHER TYPES OF SECURITIES
Sum of All Relief Requested: $400,000.00
Disposition: AWARD AGAINST PARTY
Disposition Date: 12/29/2010
Sum of All Relief Awarded: $585,000.00
There may be a non-monetary award associated with this arbitration.
Please select the Case Number above to view more detailed information.
i
Disclosure 2 of 2
Type of Event: ARBITRATION
Allegations: ACCOUNT ACTIVITY-BRCH OF FIDUCIARY DT; ACCOUNT ACTIVITY-
CHURNING; ACCOUNT ACTIVITY-ELDER ABUSE; ACCOUNT ACTIVITY-
FRAUD; ACCOUNT ACTIVITY-MANIPULATION; ACCOUNT ACTIVITY-
MISREPRESENTATION; ACCOUNT ACTIVITY-OMISSION OF FACTS;
ACCOUNT ACTIVITY-SUITABILITY; ACCOUNT ACTIVITY-UNAUTHORIZED
TRADING; ACCOUNT ACTIVITY-VIOLATE OF BLUE SKY LWS; ACCOUNT
RELATED-BREACH OF CONTRACT; ACCOUNT RELATED-FAILURE TO
SUPERVISE; ACCOUNT RELATED-NEGLIGENCE

Case Initiated: 01/29/2020
Case Number: 20-00320
Disputed Product Type: COMMON STOCK; MUTUAL FUNDS; OTHER TYPES OF SECURITIES;
PRIVATE EQUITIES
Sum of All Relief Requested: $400,000.01
Disposition: AWARD AGAINST PARTY
Disposition Date: 05/25/2021
Sum of All Relief Awarded: $794,432.12
There may be a non-monetary award associated with this arbitration.
Please select the Case Number above to view more detailed information.
End of Report
This page is intentionally left blank.

Firm 39914

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Firm 39914

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Firm 39914

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

BrokerCheck Report

WESTPARK CAPITAL, INC.

Section Title Page(s)

Firm Profile 2-6

WESTPARK CAPITAL, INC. Report Summary for this Firm

Firm Names and Locations

WESTPARK CAPITAL, INC.

Main Office Location

Business Telephone Number

Other Names of this Firm

Direct Owners and Executive Officers

Is this a public reporting No

Legal Name & CRD# (if any): KRETSCHMER, WENDY LOUISE

Position SENIOR EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Is this a public reporting No

Legal Name & CRD# (if any): ONESTO, RICHARD ERNEST

Is this a public reporting No

Legal Name & CRD# (if any): STERN, JASON SCOTT

Position CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER

Is this a public reporting No

Legal Name & CRD# (if any): TOCCO, NICHOLAS JAMES

Position PRESIDENT, CHIEF COMPLIANCE OFFICER

Is this a public reporting No

Legal Name & CRD# (if any): WISNIEWSKI, SARAH MARIE

©2021 FINRA. All rights reserved. 2340516

Position CHIEF COMPLIANCE OFFICER - RIA

Is this a public reporting No

Company through which WESTPARK CAPITAL GROUP, LLC

SEC Registration Questions

Self-Regulatory Organization Status Date Effective

Broker or dealer retailing corporate equity securities over-the-counter

Other Types of Business

This firm is not, directly or indirectly:

This firm is not directly or indirectly, controlled by the following:

Disclosure Event Details

Allegations: ON 09/16/2021, THE OFFICE OF FINANCIAL REGULATION ("OFFICE")

ON 09/16/2021, THE OFFICE ENTERED A FINAL ORDER ADOPTING THE

Principal Product Type: Other

Resolution: Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)

Principal Product Type: Other

Resolution: Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)

Principal Product Type: Other

Resolution: Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)

Does the order constitute a No

Principal Product Type: Other

Resolution: Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)

Docket/Case Number: AP-17-02

Principal Product Type: No Product

Principal Product Type: No Product

WESTPARK CAPITAL PERMITTED A BROKER TO CONDUCT FINANCIAL

Principal Product Type: Other

Principal Product Type: No Product

Principal Product Type: No Product

Current Status: Final

Principal Product Type: Other

Principal Product Type: No Product

Resolution: Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)

Principal Product Type: No Product

Resolution: Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)