278-Article Text-417-1-10-20210126
278-Article Text-417-1-10-20210126
278-Article Text-417-1-10-20210126
ABSTRACT
Organic farming in Indonesia is growing rapidly. market demand is very high but most organic farming businesses have not been able to meet
market needs. the main problem lies in the business strategy used, which has not yet led to sustainability. This research tries to formulate a
sustainable strategy that can be applied in organic farming in Indonesia. This research uses analytical hierarchy process to weight the available
alternative strategies. alternative strategies and influencing factors and actors were obtained from a meta-analysis of the organic agriculture
literature in Indonesia. Data collection was carried out through in-depth interviews with experts in the world of organic agriculture in Indonesia.
The weighting results shows that most important factor in developing sustainability strategy is the development of HR (0.269). The most
important actor that need to be involved in the development of the strategy is the agricultural manager (0.413), while the goal that need to be
achieved once the strategy is implemented is increasing farmers' income (0.372) and the highest weighting alternative strategy is product
innovation that has high added value and is responded well by the market (0.138).
Keywords
analytical hierarchy process, organic farming, pairwise comparison, meta-analysis, sustainability strategies.
Article Received: 10 August 2020, Revised: 25 October 2020, Accepted: 18 November 2020
298
www.psychologyandeducation.net
PSYCHOLOGY AND EDUCATION (2020) 57(9): 298-305 ISSN: 00333077
Literature Review
Organic Farming
Picture 1. Hierarchy of Categories (Kukrety et al. 2013)
The philosophy that underlies organic farming is the principle
of feeding the soil, which in turn provides the soil with food
Pairwise Comparison
for plants (feeding the soils that feed the plants), and not
directly feeding the plants. Natural cultivating as per the
Pairwise comparison is utilized to decide the general
International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements
significance of every marker. The appraisal was performed
(IFOAM 2016) is an all-encompassing and incorporated
by leaders who were specialists in the field and who have an
farming creation framework, by advancing the wellbeing
enthusiasm for it. Appraisal of markers and choices permit
and efficiency of agro-environments normally, in order to
dynamic about the relative significance between two
deliver sufficient, quality, and manageable food and fiber.
components in a single level corresponding to the level above
Natural cultivating is an all-encompassing cultivating
it. This is finished utilizing a rating scale (size of 1 to 9
framework that bolsters and quickens biodiversity, organic
notwithstanding reverse qualities). The pairwise correlations
cycles, and soil organic exercises.
have two standards:
Identified with the use of natural agribusiness in Indonesia,
1. The need of each factor comparative with itself is
Lumbanraja (2013) expressed the significance of procedure
equivalent to 1.
in the use of the natural way of thinking. The procedure
2. If the need of factor A to factor B is equivalent to I,
received in natural cultivating is to move supplements rapidly
at that point the need of factor B to factor A ought to be
from crop deposits, fertilizer and compost into soil biomass,
equivalent to 1/I.
which after experiencing the mineralization procedure will
become supplements in the dirt. At the end of the day,
supplements are reused through at least one phases of the Material And Methods
type of natural mixes before they are consumed by plants.
This is entirely unexpected from customary farming which Data was collected through in-depth interviews with experts
gives supplements rapidly and straightforwardly as an consisting of Deputy Coordinating Ministry for Food and
answer, so it is promptly caught up with the sum and time of Agriculture, Director General of Horticulture, Expert Staff of
organization as per plant needs. the Ministry of Trade, Chair of the Indonesian Organic
Alliance and owners of organic farming businesses in
Analytical Hierarchy Process Indonesia, from January to July 2019.
The process of preparing a hierarchy consists of three
Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP) is utilized as a stages, namely (1) identifying the overall objectives of
dynamic device for the distinguishing proof of reasonable making a hierarchy or commonly called a goal or focus, (2)
natural cultivating locales. AHP was created by Saaty determining the criteria needed or in accordance with the
(1990), for setting-up a various leveled model dependent on overall goal or focus, (3) identifying alternatives which will
standards and options for speaking to the intricate issues be evaluated under sub-criteria (Permadi 1992).
(Roig-Tierno et al. 2013). As a multicriteria dynamic The sustainable strategy structure of organic agriculture is
strategy, the AHP has been applied for taking care of a wide organized into five levels of hierarchy and the arrangement
assortment of issues that include complex models across is based on interrelated matters and is very important in
various levels, where the connection among measures is achieving focus. Prasetyaningtyas et.al. (2019) in her meta-
normal (Feizizadeh et al. 2014, Tiwari et al. 1999). analysis of organic farming literature in Indonesia shows 5
AHP is a strategy that manages multi-rules dynamic and level of important indicators. These levels consist of: (1)
considers the interest of a few partners. Garfì et al. (2011) The first level is determined as the goal or focus to be
featured multifaceted perspectives in AHP, believing it to be concentrated, namely the sustainable strategy of organic
a suitable instrument for the advancement of tasks focused agriculture in Indonesia, (2) The second level is determined
on strategies to improve expectations for everyday comforts as a factor consisting of four things that are important for
in creating nations; AHP is basic, adaptable, and sustainable strategies of organic farming, i.e. improvement of
straightforward to members, and spotlights on the human resources, capital, product innovation, and
requirements of recipients. To avoid confusion with many agricultural management models, (3) The third level is
comparisons, which significantly increases, it is determined as an actor consisting of four actors involved in
recommended that the number of elements in a category the sustainable strategy of organic agriculture, namely the
must not exceed 10 (Kukrety et al. 2013). owner of agriculture, the Foundation, the Regional
Agricultural Service, and the Indonesian Organics Alliance
(AOI), (4) The fourth level is determined as the goal in
299
www.psychologyandeducation.net
PSYCHOLOGY AND EDUCATION (2020) 57(9): 298-305 ISSN: 00333077
300
www.psychologyandeducation.net
PSYCHOLOGY AND EDUCATION (2020) 57(9): 298-305 ISSN: 00333077
301
www.psychologyandeducation.net
PSYCHOLOGY AND EDUCATION (2020) 57(9): 298-305 ISSN: 00333077
Research Report No 16. The [22] livestock policies: Diverse examples from
Netherlands,110. Uganda and Thailand. Agricultural
Systems. 96, 37-51.
[9] Carbajal-Hernández JJ, Sánchez-
Fernández LP, Villa-Vargas LA, Carrasco- [23] Goepel KD (2013) Implementing the
Ochoa JA, analytic hierarchy process as a standard
method for
[10] Martínez-Trinidad JF (2013) Water quality
assessment in shrimp culture using an [24] multi-criteria decision making in
analytical hierarchical process. Ecological corporate enterprises–a new AHP excel
Indicators. 29, 148-158. template with multiple inputs. In
Proceedings of the international
[11] Chin KS, Xu DL, Yang JB, Ping-Kit Lam J
symposium on the analytic hierarchy
(2008) Group-based ER–AHP system for
process. 2013: 1-10. Creative Decisions
product
Foundation Kuala Lumpur.
[12] project screening. Expert Systems with
[25] Huang W, Yano S, Zhang J, Wang Y
Applications. 35, 1909-1929.
(2013) Application of analytic hierarchy
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2007.08.077
process in
[13] Chrysanthini B, Sumarwan U, Rifin A
(2017) Preferensi konsumen terhadap [26] selecting a biological indicator for a river
flow restoration. Ecological Indicators. 25,
produk sayuran
180-183.
[14] organik (penelitian kasus konsumen UD
[27] Hubeis M, Najib M, Widyastuti H, Wijaya
Fabela-Myfarm) di Bogor Jawa Barat.
NH (2013) Farmer-based high value-added
Manajemen IKM, Vol. 12 No. 2, pp. 151-
organic
160.
[28] food production strategy. Indonesian
[15] Fadlina IM, Supriyono B, Soeady S (2013)
Agricultural Science Journal.18 (3): 194-
Perencanaan pembangunan pertanian
199.
berkelanjutan:
[29] [IFOAM] International Federation of
[16] Kajian tentang Pengembangan Pertanian
Organic Agriculture Movements (2016)
Organik di Kota Batu. J-PAL. 4(1).
The world of
[17] Feizizadeh B, Jankowski P, Blaschke T
[30] organic agriculture. Statistic and emerging
(2014) A GIS based spatially-explicit
trends 2016. http://www.organik-
sensitivity and
world.net/yearbook/yearbook-2016.html
[18] uncertainty analysis approach formulti-
[31] Kara Y, Köne AÇ (2012) The
criteria decision analysis. Comput. Geosci.
analytic hierarchy process (AHP) approach
64, 81–95.
for assessment of
[19] Garfì M, Ferrer-Martí L, Bonoli A,
[32] regional environmental sustainability.
Tondelli S (2011) Multi-criteria analysis
Evidence for Sustainable Development:
for improving
2012 Berlin Conference on the Human
[20] strategic environmental assessment of Dimensions of Global Environmental
water programmes. A case study in semi- Change, pp. 5-6.
arid region of Brazil. J Environ Manage.
[33] Khalil N, Kamaruzzaman SN, Baharum
92(3): 665-75.
MR (2016) Ranking the indicators of
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.10.
building
007
[34] performance and the users’ risk via
[21] Gerber PJ, Carsjens GJ, Pak-uthai T,
Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP): Case
Robinson TP (2008) Decision support for
of Malaysia. Ecological Indicators. 71,
spatially targeted
567-576.
302
www.psychologyandeducation.net
PSYCHOLOGY AND EDUCATION (2020) 57(9): 298-305 ISSN: 00333077
[35] Kukrety S, Jose S, Alavalapati JRR (2013) [50] Agricultural Extension 23 (3), pp. 167-
Exploring stakeholders’ perception with 207.
analytic [51] Prasetyaningtyas SW, Syamsul M, Sobir,
[36] hierarchy process—A case study of red Aji H (2019) Utilizing Stakeholders
sanders restoration in India. Restoration Analysis on
Ecology. 1(6). [52] Sustainable Organic Farming in West
[37] Lumbanraja P (2013) Pertanian Java: The Case of Cisarua Organic
berwawasan lingkungan: Materi Farming. Jurnal manajemen dan Agribisnis
pengabdian masyarakat Juni 16 (1).
[38] 2013. Kec. Gunung Meriah; Kab. [53] Roig-Tierno N, Baviera-Puig A, Buitrago-
Deliserdang. Fakultas Pertanian. Vera J, Mas-Verdu F (2013) The retail site
Universitas HKBP location
[39] Nommensen – Medan. [54] decision process using GIS and
theanalytical hierarchy process. Appl.
[40] Mayrowani H (2015) Development of
Geogr. 40, 191–198.
organic agriculture in Indonesia. Agro
Economic [55] Saaty TL (1990) An exposition of the
AHP in reply to the paper ―remarks on the
[41] Research Forum. 30(2): 91-108.
analytic
[42] Parra-López C, Calatrava-Requena J, de-
[56] hierarchy process‖. Management science.
Haro-Giménez T (2008) A systemic
36(3): 259-268.
comparative
[57] Stefan A, Paul L (2008) Does it pay to
[43] assessment of the multifunctional
be green? A systematic overview.
performance of alternative olive systems in
Academy of
Spain within an AHP-extended
framework. Ecological Economics. 64, [58] Management Perspectives. 22(4): 45-62.
820-834. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2008.3559035
3
[44] Permadi B (1992) AHP. Inter-University
Center for Economic Studies, University [59] Tiwari DN, Loof R, Paudyal GN (1999)
of Environmental-eco-nomic decision-
making in
[45] Indonesia. Jakarta (ID): PAU UI.
[60] lowland irrigated agriculture using multi-
[46] Priastuti D, Suroso IA, Najib M (2014)
criteria analysis techniques. Agric. Syst.
Analysis of strategies to improve the
60 (2), 99–112.
competitiveness of
organic vegetables. Journal of [61] Xu Y, Sun J, Zhang J, Xu Y, Zhang M,
Management and Organization. V(3). Liao X (2012) Combining AHP with GIS
in synthetic
[47] Prasetyaningtyas SW, Syamsul M, Sobir,
Aji H (2019) Sustainable Strategies for [62] evaluation of environmental suitability for
Organic living in China’s 35 major cities. Int. J.
Geogr. Inf.Sci. 26 (9), 1603–1623.
[48] Agriculture in Indonesia (Doctoral
dissertation, Bogor Agricultural [63] Xu, Y., Zhang, Y (2009) An online credit
University). Prasetyaningtyas SW, evaluation method based on AHP and
Syamsul M, Sobir, Aji H (2019) Using SPA,
Interpretive Structure Modelling [64] Communications in Nonlinear Science and
[49] in Developing an Organic farming Numerical Simulation 14(7): 3031– 3036.
Sustainability Strategy in Indonesia. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2008.10.
Journal of 018
303
www.psychologyandeducation.net
PSYCHOLOGY AND EDUCATION (2020) 57(9): 298-305 ISSN: 00333077
304
www.psychologyandeducation.net
PSYCHOLOGY AND EDUCATION (2020) 57(9): 298-305 ISSN: 00333077
Table 2. The weight and priority of the actor towards the focus
Actor Weight Priority
Owner 0.413 1
Foundation 0.280 2
Department of Agriculture 0.178 3
Indonesian Organic Alliances 0.139 4
Table 4. The weight and priority of alternative strategies towards the focus
Strategies Weight Priority
Strategy 1 0.138 1
Strategy 3 0.136 2
Strategy 5 0.121 3
Strategy 8 0.108 4
Strategy 4 0.105 5
Strategy 6 0.104 6
Strategy 7 0.104 6
Strategy 2 0.093 7
Strategy 9 0.088 8
305
www.psychologyandeducation.net