DVS Coursework

Download as doc, pdf, or txt
Download as doc, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 3

Mbarara university of science and technology

Faculty of computing and informatics


Department of information Technology
DVS Group presentation
Course Unit: political economy of Uganda
Course code: dvs 2105
Lecturer-in-charge: immaculate tumuhimbise
Submitted by:
 Nuwajuna Ronald 2021/bit/176/ps
 Muheriwe albert 2021/bit/093/ps
 Baguma innocent 2021/bit/148/ps
 Jedidiah shalom 2019/bit/011/ps
 Ainembabazi Catherine 2022/bit/034/ps
Date: 03/11/2023
Question:
Discuss the view that the British economic policies were designed to exploit and under
develop Uganda.
Introduction:
What are economic policies?
Economic policies are government actions and strategies that are designed to influence and
manage a country's economy. These policies are implemented to achieve specific economic
goals and address various issues related to economic stability, growth, and development.
What is development?
Development, refers to the coordinated progress and improvement of these three interrelated
areas to enhance the overall well-being, quality of life, and stability of the population.
The view that British economic policies in Uganda were designed to exploit and under
develop the country is a subject of historical debate. While it's essential to acknowledge that
colonial history is complex and multifaceted, there are arguments that support this
perspective:
 Resource Extraction and Economic Exploitation: The British colonial
administration in Uganda actively sought to exploit the country's rich natural
resources for their benefit. This included the extraction of minerals, timber, and
agricultural products like cotton and coffee. The profits from these resource exports
largely flowed back to the British Empire, with limited reinvestment in Uganda's
economic development.
 Cash Crop Agriculture and Neglect of Food Production: British policies promoted
cash crop agriculture, focusing on crops like cotton and coffee for export markets.
This strategy neglected food production for local consumption, leading to food
shortages and insecurity among the Ugandan population.
 Infrastructure Development for British Interests: While the British did invest in
some infrastructure like railways and roads, the primary purpose was to facilitate the
transportation of goods to the coast for export. This often meant that infrastructure
development did not adequately address the local needs of the Ugandan population.
 Forced Labour and Low Wages: The colonial administration relied on forced
labour, often referred to as "corvée labour," to construct infrastructure and work on
plantations. Wages were kept deliberately low, resulting in the exploitation of
indigenous labourers who received insufficient compensation for their work.
 Neglect of Social Services: Basic social services such as education and healthcare
were underfunded and not made widely accessible to the local population. This
hindered human development and resulted in a lack of skilled manpower in the post-
independence era.
 Land Dispossession and Displacement: British policies led to the dispossession of
land from local communities, often in favour of British settlers or commercial
interests. This disrupted traditional land tenure systems and led to the displacement of
local people, contributing to poverty and underdevelopment.
 Cultural and Social Disruption: British colonial rule also disrupted traditional
Ugandan cultural and social structures, which had long-lasting effects on the social
fabric of the country.
Conclusion:
It's important to recognize that not all aspects of British colonial rule in Uganda were solely
exploitative. Some infrastructure development and governance structures did have positive
impacts. Additionally, the legacy of exploitation and underdevelopment is not solely
attributed to British colonialism; post-independence politics and international economic
factors have also played a role in shaping Uganda's economic trajectory.
While the view that British economic policies were designed to exploit and under develop
Uganda has historical support, it's crucial to understand the complexities of colonial history
and its multifaceted impact on the country's development.

You might also like