The document discusses the view that British economic policies in Uganda were designed to exploit and underdevelop the country. It provides arguments that support this perspective, including resource extraction, neglect of food production, infrastructure for British interests, forced labor and low wages, neglect of social services, land dispossession, and cultural disruption. However, it also notes that British rule had some positive impacts and other post-colonial factors also influenced Uganda's development.
The document discusses the view that British economic policies in Uganda were designed to exploit and underdevelop the country. It provides arguments that support this perspective, including resource extraction, neglect of food production, infrastructure for British interests, forced labor and low wages, neglect of social services, land dispossession, and cultural disruption. However, it also notes that British rule had some positive impacts and other post-colonial factors also influenced Uganda's development.
The document discusses the view that British economic policies in Uganda were designed to exploit and underdevelop the country. It provides arguments that support this perspective, including resource extraction, neglect of food production, infrastructure for British interests, forced labor and low wages, neglect of social services, land dispossession, and cultural disruption. However, it also notes that British rule had some positive impacts and other post-colonial factors also influenced Uganda's development.
The document discusses the view that British economic policies in Uganda were designed to exploit and underdevelop the country. It provides arguments that support this perspective, including resource extraction, neglect of food production, infrastructure for British interests, forced labor and low wages, neglect of social services, land dispossession, and cultural disruption. However, it also notes that British rule had some positive impacts and other post-colonial factors also influenced Uganda's development.
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as doc, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 3
Mbarara university of science and technology
Faculty of computing and informatics
Department of information Technology DVS Group presentation Course Unit: political economy of Uganda Course code: dvs 2105 Lecturer-in-charge: immaculate tumuhimbise Submitted by: Nuwajuna Ronald 2021/bit/176/ps Muheriwe albert 2021/bit/093/ps Baguma innocent 2021/bit/148/ps Jedidiah shalom 2019/bit/011/ps Ainembabazi Catherine 2022/bit/034/ps Date: 03/11/2023 Question: Discuss the view that the British economic policies were designed to exploit and under develop Uganda. Introduction: What are economic policies? Economic policies are government actions and strategies that are designed to influence and manage a country's economy. These policies are implemented to achieve specific economic goals and address various issues related to economic stability, growth, and development. What is development? Development, refers to the coordinated progress and improvement of these three interrelated areas to enhance the overall well-being, quality of life, and stability of the population. The view that British economic policies in Uganda were designed to exploit and under develop the country is a subject of historical debate. While it's essential to acknowledge that colonial history is complex and multifaceted, there are arguments that support this perspective: Resource Extraction and Economic Exploitation: The British colonial administration in Uganda actively sought to exploit the country's rich natural resources for their benefit. This included the extraction of minerals, timber, and agricultural products like cotton and coffee. The profits from these resource exports largely flowed back to the British Empire, with limited reinvestment in Uganda's economic development. Cash Crop Agriculture and Neglect of Food Production: British policies promoted cash crop agriculture, focusing on crops like cotton and coffee for export markets. This strategy neglected food production for local consumption, leading to food shortages and insecurity among the Ugandan population. Infrastructure Development for British Interests: While the British did invest in some infrastructure like railways and roads, the primary purpose was to facilitate the transportation of goods to the coast for export. This often meant that infrastructure development did not adequately address the local needs of the Ugandan population. Forced Labour and Low Wages: The colonial administration relied on forced labour, often referred to as "corvée labour," to construct infrastructure and work on plantations. Wages were kept deliberately low, resulting in the exploitation of indigenous labourers who received insufficient compensation for their work. Neglect of Social Services: Basic social services such as education and healthcare were underfunded and not made widely accessible to the local population. This hindered human development and resulted in a lack of skilled manpower in the post- independence era. Land Dispossession and Displacement: British policies led to the dispossession of land from local communities, often in favour of British settlers or commercial interests. This disrupted traditional land tenure systems and led to the displacement of local people, contributing to poverty and underdevelopment. Cultural and Social Disruption: British colonial rule also disrupted traditional Ugandan cultural and social structures, which had long-lasting effects on the social fabric of the country. Conclusion: It's important to recognize that not all aspects of British colonial rule in Uganda were solely exploitative. Some infrastructure development and governance structures did have positive impacts. Additionally, the legacy of exploitation and underdevelopment is not solely attributed to British colonialism; post-independence politics and international economic factors have also played a role in shaping Uganda's economic trajectory. While the view that British economic policies were designed to exploit and under develop Uganda has historical support, it's crucial to understand the complexities of colonial history and its multifaceted impact on the country's development.