BLTB vs. CA
BLTB vs. CA
BLTB vs. CA
CA, SOTERO
CARDEMA, EUFROCINA ALCALDE CARDEMA, MELQUISEDEC P. ELIZONDO and MAXIMA T. ALCALDE, GR. L-33138-39 6/27/1975 J. Fernando appeal by certiorari
For collision caused by the negligence of Ilagan, BLTC driver., a suit was brought & damages awarded to private respondents by the LC and CA. No doubt as to the reckless manner in which the bus was driven. The accident was due to the notorious negligence of the defendant driver, Ilagan, who drove the bus of BLTC, w/out regard to existing traffic rules & regulations, & w/out due attention to the welfare & safety of his passengers & those of oncoming vehicles, resulting in the death of the owner driver of Chevrolet car, Ricardo delosReyes, & his companion, Jean Elizondo, & causing serious p. inj to Eufrocina Alcalde Cardema. The serious physical injuries suffered by Eufrocina is the subject of the complaint in Civil Case B-390, and the death of Jean in Civil Case B-391. The defenses in both cases are that there was no negligence on the part of the driver defendant, Ilagan, in driving and operating the BLTC. bus; that Ilagan had driven the bus in a careful and prudent manner, and the accident was beyond his control and was unforeseen despite the observation of extraordinary diligence; that the accident was due to the negligence of Ricardo de los Reyes, or was fortuitous in character; Defendant company had exercised and continues to exercise extraordinary diligence in the management, supervision and operation of its vehicles and personnel, including its drivers, in order to avoid injury to persons and to prevent accidents, as far as human care and foresight can provide, using the utmost diligence of a very cautious person, with due regard for all the circumstances. The two cases, having arisen from the same incident, were tried jointly by agreement of the parties." Facts: "2/18/1963, Ricardo left Calamba, Laguna, about 5AM, driving his Chevrolet car bound for Manila. Seated on the front seat beside him was his son, Eduardo, and directly behind Ricardo was Eufrocina, a cousin of Ricardo's wife. On the right of Eufrocina was her niece, Jean Elizondo, and on the latter's right was Ursula Bayan. When he reached the Manila South Super Highway, in a straight and level road, BLTC bus, driven by Ilagan and coming from the opposite direction on its way to Lemery, suddenly overtook a big cargo truck. In so doing, the bus took the left or the lane on which De los Reyes was travelling. Ricardo swerved to the right to avoid the bus but it was too late. The bus was running so fast that notwithstanding that the Chevrolet car was almost touching the shoulder of the road, the bus hit the car on the left front side up to the driver's door. The passengers of the Chevrolet car were brought to the Philippine General Hospital. Ricardo died before he could be brought to the operating room. Jean Elizondo was dead upon arrival to the PGH."
RULING: The appealed decision of November 19, 1970 is affirmed. Due regard for the safety of his passengers and other vehicles demand that a driver should not overtake another vehicle and take the left lane unless the road is clear and overtaking can be done safely. This precaution Ilagan had failed to take. Instead, he recklessly and imprudently took the left lane without regard to oncoming vehicles. In Corpus v. Paje: "As reckless imprudence or criminal negligence is not one to the three crimes mentioned in Art 33, CC, there is no independent civil action for damages that may be instituted in connection with said offense. Hence, homicide through reckless imprudence or criminal negligence comes under the general rule that the acquittal of the defendant in the criminal action is a bar to his civil liability based upon the same criminal act notwithstanding that the injured party reserved his right to institute a separate civil action. The most serious objection though is that the interpretation sought to be fastened by petitioners, considering that as pointed out in the appealed decision this is an action based on culpa aquiliana, is its disregard of codal provisions as well as of an impressive number of pronouncements of this Tribunal. From the beginning both parties were fully aware that it was the negligence of petitioner Ilagan as driver of petitioner Batangas Laguna Tayabas Bus Company, Inc. that gave rise to the civil suit.
Art. 2176 provides: "Whoever by act or omission causes damage to another, there being fault or negligence, is obliged to pay for the damage done. Such fault or negligence, if there is no existing contractual relations between the parties, is called a quasi-delict and is governed by the provisions of 14 this Chapter." The liability of an employer is made clear, under Article 2180 in this wise: "Employers shall be liable for the damages caused by their employees and household helpers acting within the scope of their assigned tasks, even though; the former are not engaged in any business or industry."