4

PUNE SHIVAJINAGAR
AP-24
PUNE SHIVAJINAGAR
AP-25
PUNE SHIVAJINAGAR
AP-26
PUNE SHIVAJINAGAR
AP-27
PUNE SHIVAJINAGAR
AP-28
PUNE SHIVAJINAGAR
AP-29
PUNE SHIVAJINAGAR
AP-30
PUNE SHIVAJINAGAR
AP-31
PUNE SHIVAJINAGAR
AP-32
PUNE SHIVAJINAGAR
AP-33
PUNE SHIVAJINAGAR
AP-34
PUNE SHIVAJINAGAR
AP-35
PUNE SHIVAJINAGAR
AP-36
PUNE SHIVAJINAGAR
AP-37
PUNE SHIVAJINAGAR
AP-38
APPENDIX-8： A Picture of CAD Elevated Station 1
AP-39
AP-40
AP-41
AP-42
AP-43
APPENDIX-13： A Picture of CAD At-grade Station 1
AP-44
AP-45
AP-46
AP-47
AP-48
APPENDIX-18： Geological Column
Project : PREPARATORY SURVEY ON THE URBAN RAILWAY PROJECT IN PUNE
Borehole No: BH-01 CLIENT : ORIENTAL CONSULTANTS CO. LTD. JOB NO : : IGPL-MUM-068/012
Sheet : 1 of 1 Casing size (mm) : 150/76 Date of Start : : 08-07-2012
T.D. (m) : 5.10 Below EGL Drilling Equipment : Rotary Drilling Rig Date of Completion :: 08-07-2012
Co-ordinates : E 0379809 / N 2049029 Water Depth (m) : ------
SPT - NUMBER
DEPTH BELOW EGL
SAMPLE & INSITU
Depth below EGL

OF BLOWS
WL / IP / MC , %
TEST DEPTH
GRAVEL,%
Cu/φ KN/m²
SYMBOL
CLAY, %
SAND,%
SILT, %
VALUE
RQD %
SCR %
TCR %
TYPE
N
15-30
30-45
0-15
DESCRIPTION
0 0.00 - 0.50 0.00 MADE GROUND (recovered as pieces of Basalt)

0.50 - 1.50 22 9 9
1
1.50 - 1.80 24 50 - >100 1.50 Very dense, blackish, SAND 5 93 2

2
2.10 - 3.60 2.10 Moderately weak to moderately strong, slightly weathered, greyish 99 95 91
BASALT with secondary minerals infilling
3.60 - 5.10 98 95 87
4
Borehole Terminated at 5.10m below EGL
10
11
12
13
14
15
Remarks :
Legends
- SPT - UDS - DS WL - Liquid Limit IP - Plasticity Index MC - Moisture Content T.D. : Termination Depth
EGL : Existing Ground Level
RL - Reduced Level
- Rock Recovery - No Recovery TCR - Total Core Recovery SCR - Solid Core Recovery RQD - Rock Quality Designation
CHECKED BY : KKJ APPROVED BY : ST
AP-49
SPT - NUMBER
DEPTH BELOW EGL
SAMPLE & INSITU
Depth below EGL

OF BLOWS
WL / IP / MC , %
TEST DEPTH
GRAVEL,%
Cu/φ KN/m²
SYMBOL
CLAY, %
SAND,%
SILT, %
VALUE
RQD %
SCR %
TCR %
TYPE
N
15-30
30-45
0-15
DESCRIPTION
0 0.00 - 0.50 0.00 Very soft blakish CLAY with sand 25 59 15 1 59/25/-
1.50 - 1.60 1.50 MADE GROUND (recovered as gravel size BASALT fragments)
50 blows/ >100
5 cm
2
2.50 - 4.00 25 - -
4
4.00 - 5.50 38 - -
5.50 - 6.00 5.50 Weak, highly weathered brownish BASALT 58 24 -
6
6.00 - 7.50 6.00 Moderately weak to moderately strong slightly weathered greyish 93 91 91
BASALT with secondary minerals
7.50 - 8.50 97 73 73
9 Borehole Terminated at 8.50m below EGL
10
11
12
13
14
15
Remarks :
Legends
RL - Reduced Level
AP-50
SPT - NUMBER
DEPTH BELOW EGL
SAMPLE & INSITU
Depth below EGL

OF BLOWS
WL / IP / MC , %
TEST DEPTH
GRAVEL,%
Cu/φ KN/m²
SYMBOL
CLAY, %
SAND,%
SILT, %
VALUE
RQD %
SCR %
TCR %
TYPE
N
15-30
30-45
0-15
DESCRIPTION
0 0.00 - 0.50 0.00 MADE GROUND (gravelly SAND) 7 23 41 29 40/13/-
1
1.20 - 2.70 1.20 Moderately strong, slightly weathered, greyish amygdaloidal BASALT 100 98 98
2.70 - 4.20
3 100 97 97
10
11
12
13
14
15
Remarks :
Legends
RL - Reduced Level
AP-51
SPT - NUMBER
DEPTH BELOW EGL
SAMPLE & INSITU
Depth below EGL

OF BLOWS
WL / IP / MC , %
TEST DEPTH
GRAVEL,%
Cu/φ KN/m²
SYMBOL
CLAY, %
SAND,%
SILT, %
VALUE
RQD %
SCR %
TCR %
TYPE
N
15-30
30-45
0-15
DESCRIPTION
0 0.00 - 0.50 0.00 Medium dense to dense sandy SILT (Filled up soil) 19 55 22 4 61/24/-
1.50 - 1.95 11 19 25 44 9 43 41 7 60/25/-

2
3
3.00 - 3.45 9 26 35 61 3.00 Very dense, reddish silty SAND 7 23 63 7 44/14/-
4
4.00 - 5.50 4.00 Moderately strong, slightly weathered, reddish brown BASALT with 99 97 87
secondary minerals
5.50 - 7.00 98 71 42
6
- moderately weak below 6.50m
7
10
11
12
13
14
15
Remarks :
Legends
RL - Reduced Level
AP-52
SPT - NUMBER
DEPTH BELOW EGL
SAMPLE & INSITU
Depth below EGL

OF BLOWS
WL / IP / MC , %
TEST DEPTH
GRAVEL,%
Cu/φ KN/m²
SYMBOL
CLAY, %
SAND,%
SILT, %
VALUE
RQD %
SCR %
TCR %
TYPE
N
15-30
30-45
0-15
DESCRIPTION
0 0.00 - 0.50 0.00 MADE GROUND (SANDY SILT) 7 36 54 3 37/8/-
1 0.80 - 1.10 Nill Nill Nill

1.10 -2.60 1.10
Moderately weak to moderately strong, slightly weathered reddish brown
amygdaloidal BASALT 96 71 16
2
2.60 - 4.10 97 95 74

5
10
11
12
13
14
15
Remarks :
Legends
RL - Reduced Level
AP-53
SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS ON SOIL SAMPLES
Project : PREPARATORY SURVEY ON THE URBAN RAILWAY PROJECT IN PUNE Job No :IGPL-MUM/
CLIENT : ORIENTAL CONSULTANTS CO. LTD.

Direct Shear
Depth (m) Density (t/m3) Grain Size Analysis (%) Consistancy Limits (%) Swell Properties Triaxial Shear Test Consolidation Test Laboratory CBR (%)
Test
Pre
Mechanical Hydrometer Type of Test: Comm Initial
Type of Test: UU Consolidat Soaked Unsoaked
Soil
analysis Analysis CD pressio Void
(USC)
ion
To
Proctor
Specific
Dry
Modified
Wet
(wP)
Remarks
n Index Ratio
NMC ( %)
( wS )
Standard/
From
(Mpa)
Gravity (G)
Plastic
0 0 Pressure ( 2.5 5.0 2.5
Clasiification
Sample Type
Swelling
Bore Hole No
Pressure
Plasticity
Gravel Sand Silt Clay C (Kpa) C (Kpa) (Cc) (e0) 5.0 mm
Index (%)
Index ( IP)
Φ Φ
Shrinkage
Free Swell
Liquid (wL)
( D/s/SPT/ UDS)
Mpa) mm mm mm
BH-01 1.50 1.80 SPT - - - 2 93 5 - N/P - -
BH-02 0.00 0.50 D/S - - - 1 15 59 25 59 34 25 2.54
BH-03 0.00 0.50 D/S - - - 29 41 23 7 40 27 13 2.6
AP-54
APPENDIX-19： Results of Laboratory Experiments
BH-04 0.00 0.50 D/S - - - 4 22 55 19 61 37 24 2.68
1.50 1.95 SPT - - - 7 41 43 9 60 35 25 2.58
3.00 3.45 SPT - - - 7 63 23 7 44 30 14 2.64
BH-05 0.00 0.50 D/S - - - 3 54 36 7 37 29 8 2.66
D/S - Disturbed Sample NMC - Natural Moisure Content UU - Un-Consolidated Un-drained CD - Consoliodated Drained
UDS - Undisturbed Sample C - Cohesion in Mpa CU - Consolidated Un-Drained Φ − Angle shearing resistance
Tested By : KB Prepared By : VN Checked By : TVS Approved By : ST
SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS ON ROCK SAMPLES

Job No. : IGPL-MUM-068/012 Date : 13/7/2012
Uniaxial Corrected Uniaxial

Length Diameter Test Moisture Unit Weight Point Load Index Modulus of
BH No. Depth(m) Porosity (%) 3 Specific Gravity Compressive Compressive Brazilian Test Remarks
(cm) (cm) Condition Absorption (%) (g/cm ) Strength(Mpa) Elasticity
Strength (MPa) Strength (MPa)
BH-1 2.10-3.50 4.72 5.31 SOAKED 2.18 4.89 2.24 2.34 0.65 14.24 12.32 - -
2.10-3.50 10.65 5.41 SOAKED 1.20 3.14 2.62 2.67 - 37.00 36.92 - -
3.60-5.10 10.32 5.46 SOAKED 1.09 2.82 2.60 2.56 - 7.74 7.68 - -
BH-2 5.50-6.00 3.53 5.32 SOAKED 1.43 3.70 2.59 2.54 0.14 3.16 2.52 - -
AP-55
6.00-7.50 10.63 5.44 SOAKED 0.99 2.46 2.50 2.53 - 27.62 27.53 - -
6.00-7.50 10.60 5.44 SOAKED 2.69 6.17 2.29 2.31 - 22.54 22.47 - -
7.50-8.90 10.68 5.46 SOAKED 1.14 2.96 2.59 2.60 - 34.67 34.57 - -
BH-3 1.20-2.70 10.60 5.45 SOAKED 2.67 6.48 2.43 2.45 - 23.69 23.61 - -
2.70-4.20 10.67 5.43 SOAKED 1.57 3.96 2.52 2.55 - 43.02 42.92 - -
BH-4 4.00-5.50 10.67 5.44 SOAKED 1.15 2.94 2.57 2.60 - 29.90 29.83 - -
5.50-7.00 10.72 5.44 SOAKED 1.33 3.44 2.59 2.74 - 27.92 27.87 - -
5.50-7.00 6.81 5.41 SOAKED 1.85 4.66 2.51 2.54 0.50 10.91 10.16 - -
BH-5 1.10-2.60 6.04 5.44 SOAKED 1.45 3.78 2.61 2.52 0.85 18.64 16.95 - -
1.10-2.60 10.73 5.39 SOAKED 0.93 2.41 2.58 2.63 - 29.49 29.47 - -
2.60-4.10 10.65 5.41 SOAKED 1.22 2.98 2.44 2.49 - 42.99 42.90 - -
Checked By: VN Approved by : ST

APPENDIX-20: Traffic Survey Sheets
Table A20-1 Traffic Volume Count Sheet
Urban Railway Project in Pune City

Classified Volume Count Survey
Station: Date & Day: Enumerator:
No. of Lanes/Dir.:
Road Name: Direction: To: Weather:
From:
Private Public Car/Jeep Van Goods Vehicles
ime Mini-Bus 2-Wheeler 3-Wheeler
Bus Bus Private Taxi Private Taxi LGV MGV HGV Tractors
:00
To
:15
:00
AP-56
To
:15
:00
To
:15
:00
To
:15
Source: Study Team

Table A20-2 Roadside OD Survey Sheet

Roadside OD Passenger Survey Sheet
Name of the Road : Interviewer :

Date :
Location:
Day :
Direction: Time (24:00 Hour Format)
"Do you use public

How many times a
Trip transport when "If so, what is the
Vehicle Type Occupancy Origin of Trip Destination of Trip Purpose of Trip week do you usually
Frequency private transport is main reason?***
ride the bus?
available?**
AP-57
Vehicle type Trip frequency Purpose of trip ** ***
1. Two-Wheeler 1. Multiple trips a day 1. Work 1. Yes 1. Faster
2. Three-Wheeler 2. Daily 2. Business 2. No 2. Less expensive
3. Car 3. Alternate Day 3. Education 3. Others(Please specify)
4. Van 4. Weekly 4. Social
5. Taxi- Small 5. Fortnightly 5. Tourism & Recreation
6. Taxi- Large 6. Monthly 6. Others
Source: Study Team

Table A20-3 Stated Preference Sheet

Stated Preference Survey Format
Pune Metro Region & JICA
Date Of Survey: Enumerator's Name:
Location Name:
1 Personal Details 2 Vehicle Ownership 3 Monthly Income in Rs

No (check one)
Age Car 1 >1 <10000
Occupation 2-Wheeler 1 >1 10000-20000
Sex 20000-30000
30000 to 50000
4 Do you receive a commutation allowance? Circle one: Yes No
50000 to 75000
75000 to 1 lakh
If yes, how much? Rs. per month Above 1 lakh
5 Travel Particulars (Please specify full travel details) 6 Dominant Mode of Travel
Two-wheeler
Origin
Own Car
Destination
Taxi
Start Time In Hrs
Company Bus
End time in Hrs
Public Bus AC/Non-AC
7 Frequency of Trip 8 Purpose
Three-Wheeler
Daily 1. Work
Shared Auto
Alternate Days 2. Business
Shared Taxi
Weekly 3. Education
8. Accompanied Travelers
Occasionally 4. Social
No. of Adults
5. Tourism & Recreation
No. of Children
9. Parking Fee (Rs) if any you paid 6. Other
Pune and PCMC are considering to implement Light Rail Transit (LRT) service from Shivaji Nagar to Hinjewadi. LRT service frequency will be
every five minutes & will be completely air-conditioned. There will also be feeder services & parking facilities at major stations. In this regard,
we wish to know your opinion about your willingness to shift to the LRT given the scenarios below.
10. SCENARIOS & RANKING, Please give your opinion based on your present mode of travel
Bus
Circle the Distance of Your Trip Max. Savings in How much are you willing to pay to ride on the LRT for your trip
on the LRT Corridor Minutes if you given the stated savings in time? Tick (√) the appropriate option. How much is your bus fare
Use LRT for the selected distance? Rs.
(incl. waiting &
(Distance in Km) in-vehicle time) Fare Level-1 Fare Level-2 Fare Level-3 Fare Level-4
<=3 13 8 12 16 20
3-6 18 11 17 22 26
6-9 23 14 21 28 39
9-12 34 17 26 34 52
12-15 40 21 32 42 65
Car/2-Wheeler
on the LRT Corridor Minutes if you given the stated savings in time? Tick (√) the appropriate option.
Use LRT
(incl. waiting &
in-vehicle time) Fare Level-1 Fare Level-2 Fare Level-3 Fare Level-4
6-9 7 14 21 28 39
9-12 15 17 26 34 52
12-15 20 21 32 42 65
3-wheeler
on the LRT Corridor Minutes if you given the stated savings in time? Tick (√) the appropriate option. How much is your fare for
Use LRT the selected distance? Rs.
(incl. waiting &
in-vehicle time) Fare Level-1 Fare Level-2 Fare Level-3 Fare Level-4
<=3 7 8 12 16 20
3-6 11 11 17 22 26
6-9 15 14 21 28 39
9-12 25 17 26 34 52
12-15 30 21 32 42 65
Source: Study Team
AP-58
Table A20-4 Bus OD/Occupancy Survey Sheet

Bus Origin-Destination & Occupancy
Location Date :
Road Name : Day:
Landmark: Direction :
Enumerator : Weather:
Standing Crush
Bus Sitting
Time Bus Route No. Origin Destination Capacity Capacity
Category Capacity (%)
(%) (Put Mark)
A/C City Non-A/C City Interstate School

Bus category Company buses
Service Buses Service Buses Buses buses
Code 1 2 3 4 5
Source: Study Team
AP-59
Table A20-5 Bus Passenger Count Survey

Bus Passenger Counts
Location Date :
Road Name : Day:
Landmark: Direction :
Enumerator : Weather:
No. of Passengers No. of Passengers
Time Bus Type Bus Route Number (with Origin & Destination)
Alighted Boarded
A/C City Service Non-A/C City

Bus category Interstate Buses Company buses School buses
Buses Service Buses
ode 1 2 3 4 5
Source: Study Team
AP-60
Table A20-6 Speed/Delay Survey Sheet

Speed and Delay Survey Format
Road Name: Sheet No: Date:
Direction: Weather: Trip No:
Town: Name of Surveyor:
BEGIN END Delay

Sl.No. Time From Node To Node Delay Cause
Time Km Reading Time Km Reading (sec.)
Delay Causes
(i) Traffic Signal/Police control (viii) Pedestrian interference
(ii) Stop sign (ix) Level crossing
(iii) Market Pedestrian Crossing (x) Road repair
(iv) Right turn / U-Turn (Uncontrolled junction) (xi) Breakdown
(v) General congestion (xii) Passenger Boarding/Alighting
(vi) Accident (xiii) Ticket issuing(Fare stage)
(vii) Parked vehicles (xiv) Other delays(mention)
Source: Study Team
AP-61
Table A20-7 Road Inventory Survey Sheet
Road Inventory Survey
Chainage (Km) / Pavement Number of Lanes /

Shoulder Land Use Land Use Encroach
Location Condition Road Width Details Total Intersection Lighting
(LHS) (RHS) ments
LHS RHS width of
LHS Median RHS Remarks
Good/Fair/ Road Way
From To Width Width Width Heavy/ Central /
Poor Type Width Type Width (m) R/C/I/A/O/ R/C/I/A/O/ Type of Type of
(m) (m) (m) Moderate/ Roadside/
(P/UP) (m) (P/UP) (m) W W junction control
Nil Nil
AP-62
Source: Study Team
APPENDIX-21: LRT Demand Forecast for the Year 2048
Below, an estimate of the travel demand for the LRT in 2048 is carried out and the sufficiency of its
transportation capacity confirmed.
First, the population for Pune Metropolitan Region (PMR) for 2048 is estimated based on the trend
analysis of the data indicated in section 3.6 of the main report. As illustrated in Figure A21-1, the
population of PMR in 2048 will become approximately 14.52 million.
16.00
14.00
14.52
12.00
Population (mil.)
12.24
10.00
9.68
8.00
7.34
6.00
5.85 6.10
4.00
2.00
0.00
2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050
Year
Figure A21-1 PMR Population Trend till the Year 2048

Source: Study Team
According to the travel demand model, the relationship between the growth in trip making and
population is constant. Based on this relationship, growth in trip making for the period of 2028 to 2038
is multiplied by the population growth rate for 2038 to 2048 to arrive at the growth rate for trip
making for the period of 2038 to 2048, which is 2%. With this estimate, the number of daily trips in
2038 of 13.01 million grows to 16.14 million in 2048 (see Figure A21-2).
18
16
16.14
14
Daily Trips (mil.)
12
13.01
10
9.67
8
6 6.84
4
2
0
2018 2028 2038 2048 2058
Year
Figure A21-2 Trend in Daily Trips in PMR till the Year 2048
Source: Study Team
AP-63
In the case of Fare Level-2, LRT’s peak-hour trips account for 5% of PMR’s daily trips in 2038. It is
assumed that this relationship remains the same for 2048. Based on this assumption, the number of
LRT peak-hour trips is approximately 80,000. By applying these trips to update the 2038 OD matrix,
the number of peak-hour trips in the peak direction is calculated and the trend till 2048 plotted in
Figure A21-3.
50,000
45,000
Total Pax. Flows for PHPDT
44,108
40,000
35,000
30,000
32,302
25,000
20,000 20,781
15,000
10,000
10,722
5,000
0
2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050
Year
Figure A21-3 Peak Hour Peak Direction Passenger Flows for Partially Elevated LRT
Source: Study Team
In Figure A21-4 the trend in maximum sectional load for Fare Level-2 is given. As the figure shows,
the LRT will be capable of coping with travel demand in the year 2048. However, to achieve this it
will be necessary to increase the length of the LRT from 60m to 70m with an headway of 2.5 minutes.
25,000
Capacity: 19,320
Maximum Sectional Load
20,000
19,800
15,000
15,102
10,865
10,000
5,000 6,978
0
2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050
Year
Figure A21-4 Peak Hour Maximum Sectional Load for Partially Elevated LRT
Source: Study Team
AP-64
APPENDIX-22: PMC Environmental Study(Water quality, Air quality, Noise)
BOD in Mutha river from year 2008 to 2011
90
2008
80 2009
2010
70 2011
Standard Value
60
BOD(mg/lit)
50
40
30
20
10
0
Vitthalwadi Mhatre Erandwane Joshi Sawarkar Railway
Bridge Bridge Bridge Bridge
Sampling Locations
Figure A22-1 BOD (Mutha River) 2008~2011
Source: PMC Environmental Status Report (2011-2012)
BOD in Mula and Mula-Mutha river from year 2008 to 2011

90
2008
80 2009
2010
70 2011
60 Standard Value
BOD(mg/lit)
50
40
30
20
10
0
Aundh Mula pawana Harris Bridge Holkar Wakdewadi Sangam Yerwada Mundhwa
Confluence Bridge Bridge
Sampling Locations
Figure A22-2 BOD (Mula and Mula-Mutha river) 2008~2011

AP-65
COD in Mutha river from year 2008 to 2011
180
160
140
120
COD(mg/lit)
100
80
60 2008
40 2009
2010
20 2011
Standard Value
0
Vitthalwadi Mhatre Erandwane Joshi Sawarkar Railway
Bridge Bridge Bridge Bridge
Sampling Locations
Figure A22-3 COD (Mutha river) 2008~2011
COD in Mula and Mula-Mutha river from year 2008 to 2011
180
2008
160 2009
2010
140 2011
120 Standard Value
COD(mg/lit)
100
80
60
40
20
0
Aundh Mula pawana Harris Bridge Holkar Wakdewadi Sangam Yerwada Mundhwa
Confluence Bridge Bridge
Sampling Locations
Figure A22-4 COD (Mula and Mula-Mutha river) 2008~2011

AP-66
DO in Mutha river from year 2008 to 2011
5 2008
2009
4 2010
2011
Standard Value
DO(mg/lit)
0
Vitthalwadi Mhatre Erandwane Joshi Bridge Sawarkar Railway
Bridge Bridge Bridge
Sampling Locations
Figure A22-5 DO (Mutha river) 2008~2011
DO in Mula and Mula-Mutha river from year 2008 to 2011

5
2008
2009
4 2010
2011
Standard Value
DO(mg/lit)
0
Aundh Mula pawana Harris Bridge Holkar Bridge Wakdewadi Sangam Yerwada Mundhwa
Confluence Bridge
Sampling Locations
Figure A22-6 DO (Mula and Mula-Mutha river) 2008~2011

AP-67
SOx from year 2008 to 2011
Standard 2008-09
70
Standard 2010 onwards
60
50
Navi Peth
SOx(μg/m3)
40 Oasis
Mandai
30
20
10
0
2008 2009 2010 2011
Monitoring Years
Figure A22-7 SOx 2008~2011

NOx from year 2008 to 2011

80
Standard 2008-09 Navi Peth
70 Oasis
Mandai
60 Standard 2010 onwards
NOx(μg/m3)
50
40
30
20
10
0
2008 2009 2010 2011
Monitoring Years
Figure A22-8 NOx 2008~2011

AP-68
RSPM from year 2008 to 2011
180
Navi Peth Standard Value
160 Oasis
Mandai
140
RSPM(μg/m3)
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
2008 2009 2010 2011
Monitoring Years
Figure A22-9 RSPM 2008~2011

PM 2 . 5 from year 2008 to 2011

90
Vishrambagwada Ward
80 Office
Standard Value Indradhanushya
70
Hadapsar
60
PM2.5(μg/m3 )
50
40
30
20
10
0
February March
Sampling Months
Figure A22-10 PM2.5 2011

AP-69
Noise in Commercial Areas from year 2008 to 2011
100
2008 2009 2010 2011
90
80
Noise Level dB(A)Leq
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
te
O
k
e
ge
p
g
e
e
k
e
t
da
er
H4
ke
ar
to
ow
ow
fic
H4
in
idg
tu
RT
ga
r id
nt
an
il d
u
lS
ar
ta
Of
ch
Br
(N
sq
Ch
ar
Ce
B
(
M
Bu
M
.
rS
Na
Bk
Sw
hi
ar
an
n
E
en
KK
v.
ga
PC
so
nd
C
dk
ar
sh
on
En
em
PM
rri
m
Ga
be
Ne
M
Pa
ga
Ka
a
Ha
Br
Am
ar
ad
hy
ar
j iv
Ne
Ne
us
Ra
hn
ad
Monitoring Locations
dr
In
Figure A22-11 Noise in Commercial Areas 2008~2011

Noise in Residential Areas from year 2008 to 2011

100
90 2008 2009 2010 2011
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
O
)
re
)
op
wk
da
er
H4
at
ow
H4
RT
ua
St
nt
an
o
g
.(N
ch
(N
sq
ar
Ch
Ce
M
l
Na
Bk
Sw
an
ar
E
en
v.
dk
ar
sh
on
En
em
be
Ne
Pa
ga
Br
a
Am
ad
hy
W
us
hn
ad
dr
In
Figure A22-12 Noise in Residencial Areas 2008~2011

AP-70
Noise in Residential Areas from year 2008 to 2011
100
2008 2009 2010 2011
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Indradhnushya Nal Stop RTO Swargate Mandai
Env. Center
Figure A22-13 Noise in Silence Areas 2008~2011

Source:PMC Environmental Status Report (2011-2012)
AP-71
APPENDIX-23: Pictures of Land Acquisition’s Area
Source: All pictures are taken by JICA Study Team
St9~10: Police Station and Police Training Center
St9 Pic.1：South of Police Station St9 Pic.2：Police Station
St9 Pic.3：Police Training Center St9Pic.4：North of Police Training Center
AP-72
Near Mula river:Temple, Residence, Retailer, School, Park
Near Mula river Pic. 1：North of Temple Near Mula river Pic. 2：South of Temple
Near Mula river Pic. 3：In front of Temple Near Mula river Pic. 4：Area under construction
Near Mula river Pic. 5：Retailer Near Mula river Pic. 6：Retailer
AP-73
Near Mula river Pic. 11：Retailer Near Mula river Pic. 12：Residence
Near Mula river Pic.13：Residence Near Mula river Pic. 14：Retailer
Near Mula river Pic. 15：Residence Near Mula river Pic. 16：Residence
AP-74
Near Mula river Pic. 17：Residence Near Mula river Pic. 18：Retailer
Near Mula river Pic. 19：Retailer Near Mula river Pic. 20：Residence
Near Mula river Pic. 21：Residence Near Mula river Pic. 22：Bus Stop
Near Mula river Pic. 23：School Near Mula river Pic. 24：School
AP-75
Near Mula river Pic. 25：Temple Near Mula river Pic. 26：Park near Temple
AP-76
East of NH4: Retailer
East of NH4 Pic.1：Retailer East of NH4 Pic.2：Retailer
AP-77
East of NH4 Pic.9：Retailer East of NH4 Pic.10：Empty Land
East of NH4 Pic.11：Empty Land East of NH4 Pic.12：Empty Land
East of NH4 Pic.13：Residence of Labors East of NH4 Pic.14：Area under construction
AP-78
AP-79
West of NH4: Retailer and Residence
West of NH4 Pic. 1：Retailer West of NH4 Pic.2：Retailer
West of NH4 Pic.3：Retailer West of NH4 Pic.4：Empty Land
West of NH4 Pic.5：Residence West of NH4 Pic.6：Residence
West of NH4 Pic.7：Retailer West of NH4 Pic.8：Retailer
AP-80
West of NH4 Pic.9：Retailer West of NH4 Pic.10：Residence
West of NH4 Pic.11：Retailer
AP-81
Depot: Factory, School, Residence, Field
Depot Pic.1：School Depot Pic.2：School
Depot Pic.3：South of School Depot Pic.4：South of School
Depot Pic.5：East of School Depot Pic.6：West of School
Depot Pic.7：Factory Depot Pic.8：Residence near School
AP-82
Depot Pic.9：Residence South of School Depot Pic.10：Residence South of School
Depot Pic.11：Residence South of School Depot Pic.12：Field of Sorghum
Depot Pic.14：Residence near Field

Depot Pic.13：Sorghum
Depot Pic.15：Residence near Field Depot Pic.16：Residence near Field
AP-83
Depot Pic.17：South of Field Depot Pic.18：West of Field
AP-84
APPENDIX-24: Suggested ToR of Environmental and Social Study for proposed
LRT Construction Project
Table A1 summarizes major tasks of the EIA study to be required for the proposed LRT Project.
Tables A2 -A4 summarize the baseline environmental social information collection, relevant field
studies such as the roadside air quality survey, and socio-cultural studies, respectively. Relevant
studies for the application of tree cutting permits are to be conducted as part of the EIA study (see
Task Items 1-9 and 5, listed in Table A1 and Task Item 9, listed in Table A3). In Pune, the
environmental monitoring of several parameters such as the roadside air quality and the water quality
have been monitored periodically since 2004 (see Table 7.2.1). Those monitoring results and/or
database shall be incorporated in the baseline environmental information collection work listed in
Tables A1 and A2.
Table-24-A1 Major Tasks for EIA-related Study

Items to be collected
1 Descriptions of Baseline Environmental Condition
Describe the environmental baseline condition of selected pre-feasibility projects.
1) Bio-Physical condition
2) Socio-Cultural condition
More detailed descriptions are summarized in Table-A2.
2 Environmental Field Survey
Carry out the following environmental field surveys,
1) Roadside Air Quality Survey
2) Roadside Noise Survey
3) Roadside Vibration Survey
4) Soil Survey
5) Sediment Survey
6) Water Quality Survey
7) Groundwater Quality Survey
8) Hydrological Survey
9) Tree Inventory Survey
More detailed descriptions are summarized in Table A3.
3 Social Survey
Carry out the following social surveys,
1) Socio-Cultural Survey
2) RAP-related survey
3) RAP-related survey (illegal squatters)
More detailed descriptions are summarized in Table A4.
4 Environmental Impact Assessment
The evaluation of the potential environmental impacts of the three project stages such as 1) pre-construction phase, 2)
construction phase, and 3) operational phase shall be described. Additionally, the following impact assessment
studies shall be conducted in order to stress the advantages/disadvantages of the proposed project quantitatively.
1) Vehicular Emission Study (CO2)
2) Air Quality Prediction Study
3) Noise Prediction Study
4) Vibration Prediction Study
5) Run-off (road surface drainage) Study
6) Urban Vegetation Impact Study
7) Mula River Flood Prediction Study
8) Regional Land Subsidence Prediction Study
9) Visual Impact Study
10) Socio-Economic Impact Study
AP-85
5 Environmental Mitigation
Describe comprehensive, effective measures for the mitigation (i.e., avoidance, reduction, and elimination) of
negative impacts for the pre-construction, construction and operation phases of the project. In particular, the re-
vegetation plan, based on study results of both the tree inventory survey (Item 9 of Table 6.4.3) and the urban
vegetation impact study shall be developed.
6 Environmental Management
Establish an appropriate environmental management plan. Specific objectives of this plan are to 1) define
organizational and administrative arrangements for the environmental monitoring including the definition of
responsibilities of staff, coordination, liaison and reporting procedures, and 2) to discuss the procedures for proactive
environmental management, so that potential problems can be identified and mitigation measures adopted prior to the
construction commencement.
7 Environmental Monitoring
Establish an appropriate environmental monitoring program. The scope of the monitoring plan is 1) to identify the
monitoring tasks, 2) to identify the nature and the schedule of the monitoring, and 3) to identify samples to be taken
for analysis and parameters to be measured.
8 Public Involvement
Describe the contents of both the stakeholder meetings and the information disclosures held for selected pre-
feasibility projects. Following are the major items to be checked within this item,
Stakeholder Meetings
(1) Entire Schedule of stakeholder meetings (e.g., dates and places)
(2) List of Participants
(3) Minutes of Meeting
(4) Hand outs and/or brochures, used for the public participation process.
Information Disclosure
(1) Outline of the entire information disclosure process (dates and the methods for disclosures: Internet, library,
newspaper and others).
(2) Disclosure (public review) periods
(3) Comments and/or questions collected from the information disclosure.
Source: ｖThis Study, 2012
Table-A24-2 Baseline Environmental and Social Conditions

1. Bio-Physical condition
1) Regional hydrology (e.g., major tributaries, channels, regional water balance)
2) Water quality of surface/subsurface water within the study area.
3) Air quality
4) Regional drainage
5) Roadside noise/vibration/air quality
6) Climate
7) Geology
8) Disaster Records (e.g., past earthquake, landslide, inundation or flood events)
Especially, past flood events of Mula River shall be investigated.
9) Soil/sediment
10) Biological Environment
2. Socio-Cultural condition
1) Cultural (historical and archaeological) resources (e.g., Ruins, memorial facilities, historic spots and others)
2) Visual resources (e.g., scenic zones, townscape)
3) Land take/resettlements (e.g., conditions of existing roadside buildings)
4) Illegal squatters
5) Land use
6) Water use (e.g., water supply system, wells and others)
7) Schools, hospitals, parks, libraries, religious facilities.
8) Waste Disposal Sites (location, capacity, treatment method)
9) Vehicle Registration
10) Vehicle Inspection/Maintenance Program
11) Clean Fuel Program
12) Sewerage system
AP-86
3. Pollution
1) Roadside Air Quality
2) Roadside Noise
3) Roadside Vibration
4) Soil Contamination
5) Sediment Contamination
6) Water Contamination
7) Bad odour
Source: This Study, 2012
Table-24-A3 List of Field Environmental Studies

1. Roadside Air Quality
Carry out 24-hour continuous survey at five points across the study area.
Parameters: PM2.5, PM10, CO, HC, NOX, and SOX
Traffic volume by vehicle type
Survey Campaign: At least twice (once in the rainy season and the other in the dry season).
Note that one survey point shall be for baseline air quality condition across Pune City, which would represent the air
quality environment without significant negative impacts from nearby traffic volume.
2. Roadside Noise
Parameter: Leq
Note that one survey point shall be for baseline noise condition across Pune City, which would represent the noise
environment without significant negative impacts from nearby traffic volume.
3. Roadside Vibration
Parameter: L10
Note that one survey point shall be for baseline vibration condition across Pune City, which would represent the vibration
environment without significant negative impacts from nearby traffic volume.
4. Soil Survey
A soil survey is to be carried out at five points in total across the study areas in order to obtain the baseline soil
characteristics data that would support the identification of potential contaminated soil sites. Several heavy metals and
other contaminant parameters such as arsenic, PCB, Chrome, iron, lead, zinc and mercury are of concern.
5. Sediment Survey
A sediment survey is to be carried out at two points in total across the proposed construction areas, inside and nearby Mula
River in order to obtain the baseline port sediment characteristics data that would support the identification of potential
contaminated sediment sites. Several heavy metals and other contaminant parameters such as arsenic, PCB, Chrome, iron,
lead, zinc and mercury are of concern.
6. Water Quality Survey
Two sampling points in total shall be designated along Mula River around the study area (e.g., one point in a downstream
site and the other in an upstream site). Ten parameters such as pH, turbidity, DO, BOD, COD, conductivity, temperature,
SS, E-Coliform and Total Coliform are of concern. Available current water quality data from the competent agencies
and/or organizations is to be examined to improve the credibility of the whole water quality data collected in this study.
7.Groundwater Quality Survey
Three or four sampling points in total shall be designated around the study area. The exact number of sampling points for
wells shall be determined based on the existing groundwater usage information, to address the proposed baseline
environmental and social information collection. Ten parameters such as pH, turbidity, DO, BOD, COD, conductivity,
temperature, SS, E-Coliform and Total Coliform are of concern. Available current water quality data from the competent
agencies and/or organizations is to be examined to improve the credibility of the whole water quality data collected by this
study.
AP-87
8. Hydrological Study
7.1 Literature Review
Carry out a literature review/or database search that would contain appropriate regional hydrological information based on
the available hydrological and/or meteorological data such as,
a) Rain
b) Regional Groundwater Level
c) Groundwater pumping rate (locations included)
d) Evapo-transpiration data
e) Regional Drainage System
7.2 Regional Water Balance

a) Analyse regional water balance under non-flood condition (dry and rainy seasons)
b) Analyse regional water balance under flood events.
9. Tree Inventory Survey
A tree inventory survey is to be carried out in the green areas located within the areas of concern in order to grasp the
existing tree inventory and prepare for the permit application for tree-cutting to be required for the implementation of the
proposed project.
Methodology
1) Determine the green areas located inside of the areas of concern.
2) Prepare a tree inventory by grasping the following information,
a) Name of Tree (academic, English and local name)
b) GPS Coordinates
c) DBH (Diameter at Breast Height)
d) Photo records of each tree.
e) IUCN-status
f) Others
3) Prepare a tree distribution and/or vegetation map.
Table-24-A4 List of Relevant Socio Cultural Studies

1. Socio-Cultural Survey
Community participation plays an important role for proper infrastructure project planning and management. It is essential
to examine a variety of aspects of the proposed project based on the current community’s needs and priorities. A
questionnaire-based socio-cultural survey is to be carried out in order to properly grasp the public opinion about this
proposed project as well as current concerns about the urban transport system of Pune from nearby communities. It is
recommended to have 500 interviews (or samples) inside and outside of the study area. The opinion survey sheet will be
provided to local a consultant by the JICA Study Team.
2. RAP-related Survey
As mentioned in Section 6.1, the study area is classified as of either mixed residential/commercial areas or farm lands, and
has a certain amounts of private property such as houses and/or office complexes that will be affected by the
implementation of the proposed project.
Survey items such as an inventory of the property owners, type of property (e.g., house, multi-tenant building and others),
lease agreement and others shall be developed based on the Land Law of 1894 and the JICA Guideline as well as relevant
laws and/or regulations.
3. RAP-related Survey (illegal squatters)
Some communities of illegal squatters exist along the existing railway line. According to the JICA Guideline, it is
recommended to take appropriate social considerations for those communities in case of expropriation.
Following are the majors items to be summarized within this study,
a) Property owner and his/or her household structure (# of family member)
b) Length of stay
c) Type of Housing
d) Occupation
e) Reason to settle in this current place.
f) Willing to move out if requested.
g) Others
AP-88
APPENDIX-25: Domestic Floral Species to be used for the Design of Green Space
Table A25-1 NAME OF INDIGENIOUS TREES

Sr.NO. NAME OF TREE S.NO. NAME OF TREE
1 Kasmal 71 Kailashpati
2 Mangolia 72 Supari
3 Sonchapha 73 Naral
4 Pandhra chapha 74 Kevada
5 Ashok 75 Bamboo
6 Shendri 76 Pimparana
7 Vayvaran 77 Devdat
8 Kokam 78 Pine
9 Nag chapha/Nakesar 79 Pandhra Shirish
10 Kanak 80 Rakht rohida
11 Saal 81 Dhavada
12 Pandhari dhoop 82 Hinganabet
13 Bhend 83 Apta
14 Gorakh Chinch 84 Kate sayar
15 Rudraksh 85 Taad
16 Bel 86 Asan
17 Kavath 87 Panchunda
18 Sayali 88 Anjan
19 Neem 89 Mohogony
20 Bor 90 Bhokar
21 Reetha 91 Dandus
22 Kusum 92 Sisu
23 Babul 93 Tembuni
24 Saundad 94 Umbar
25 Shirish 95 Anant
26 Muchkund 96 Kakad
27 Bahava 97 Shivan
28 Kanchan 98 Papada
29 Chinch(Tamarind) 99 Amba
30 Pallas 100 Bakan
31 Pangara 101 Kalam
32 Bibva 102 Bartondi
33 Rakht chandan 103 Tuti
34 Shisu 104 Kadipatta
35 Shisma 105 Tetu
36 Karanj(Pongaimia pinnata) 106 Tivas
37 Tivas 107 Sindhi
38 Bhadras 108 Shammi
39 Arjun(Terminalia) 109 Bija
40 Herada(Terminalia) 110 Khair
41 Jamun(Syzigium) 111 Reetha
42 Taman(Lagesstronia) 112 Sita Ashok
43 Kadamba 113 Biba
44 Haldu 114 Haadga
AP-89
Sr.NO. NAME OF TREE S.NO. NAME OF TREE
45 Nilgiri 115 Ambada
46 Moha (Madhucaindica) 116 Jungli Badaam
47 Khirini 117 Arjun
48 Parizaat 118 Behada
49 Satvin 119 Biti
50 Aakash neem 120 Nandrukh
51 Kalavash 121 Payar
52 Shivan 122 Dikamali
53 Saag 123 Saag
54 Chandan(Sandal) 124 Jamun
55 Awala 125 Awala
56 Putrvati 126 Guava
57 Vad 127 Pomegranate
58 Pimpal 128 Orange
59 Rubber 129 Sweet lime
60 Phanas 130 Chikoo
61 Mulberry
62 Karvat
63 Chinar
64 Suru
65 Indian Popular
66 Valunja
67 Khajoor
68 Maharukh
69 Yen
70 Taad
Note: Original list is written in Hindi
AP-90
APPENDIX-26: Questionnaire Sheet for RAP-related Socio-Economic Survey
(Sample)
This is the sample sheet for the socio-economic survey and it is designed to collect relevant
information about the socio-economics and resources and to understand the communities to be
affected by the implementation of the proposed LRT project. The information to be collected will be
used to make a detailed and balanced assessment of the potential impacts of the Pune LRT project.
It is noted that any criteria and/or norms used in these survey sheets shall be modified based on the
latest social conditions around the project site. Also, it is strongly recommended that additional
questions shall be introduced to produce a more meaningful survey.
Survey Date 1
Interviewee 1
Interviewer 1
100 SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE IDENTIFICATION
A Survey Control Number:

B Type of Occupants: 1. Legal; 2. Illegal.
C Date of Interview:
D Place of Interview:
E Name of Interviewer:
G Time of Interview
101 BASIC PROFILE OF PAPs ( Data of people affected by the project )
A Name of interviewee: (only adult

members)
B Address of the interviewee:
a) House No. & Street:
b) Unit
c) Village
C Location of house: 1. Rural 2. Semi-rural
3. Urban 4. Farm
D Relation to head of family: 1. Myself; 2. Wife; 3. Child;
(choose one) 4. Partner;
5. Other (notify).
E How long have you been living here?
F Are there any tenants in this house?
If yes, number of tenants?
G How many years have the tenants resided
here?
H What is the most serious problem of the 1.
family’s livelihood in the present? 2.
I Where is the main income source of the
family (notify):
AP-91
102 BASIC PROFILE OF HEAD OF FAMILY
A Name of head of family:

B Gender: 1. Male; 2. Female.
C Age:
D Marital status: 1. Married; 2. Single; 3. Divorced
4. Separated 5. Widow
E Current Occupation: 1. Gov. service; 2. Private service;
3. Business; 4. Wage employee;
5. Agriculture; 6. Daily wage labour;
7. Unemployed;
8. Other (notify).
F Level of education completed: 1. Illiterate; 2. Can read only;

3. Can both read and write;
4. Kindergarten 5. Primary school;
6. Secondary school; 7. University
8. University or specific technical school
9. Others
H Faith (Religion): 1. Buddhist; 2. Hindu 3. Muslim

(Choose one) 4. Other (Specify)
I Total number of family members: Total Females Males

(including infants and children)
J Total number of households in one
structure:
(e.g. if there are 2 households in one
house, record as “2”)
103 HOUSING BUDGET
A Average Income Daily (Rupees) Monthly (Rupees) Yearly (Rupees)

a) Agriculture
b) Wage labour
c) Business/Trading
d) Service
e) Livestock & animal Husbandry
f) Fishing & Aquaculture
g) Cottage Craft
h) Forestry
j) Salary
k) Other (notify)
Total income
AP-92
B Have you taken any loans? 1. Previously; 2. Currently; 3 Never; 4 Don’t know.
If YES ask for details – amount,
when, from whom, when due to
repay
104 ACCESS TO UTILITIES
A Potable Water in the village Dug well (Private: Protected or Unprotected);

(which isn’t transportable) Dug well (Common: Protected or Unprotected);
(Choose all that apply) Pump well (Private: Protected or Unprotected);
Pump well (Common: Protected or Unprotected);
Public water supply;
Bought from water vendors;
Other facilities (Specify);
Other natural water sources (Specify)
B Toilet Facilities: In-door toilet;

(Choose main one) Out-door toilet (Private);
Out-door toilet (Common);
Not available.
C Access to Electricity: Power line;
Generator (Private);
Generator (Common);
Battery;
Not Available.
105 Others
A Have you experienced any No;

hazard such as flood or storm? Yes;
If Yes, please specify. Flood;
(Choose all that apply) Storm;
Others
B If Yes is the answer to A, how Frequently
often have you experienced Others (please specify)
these events?
C How did you survive that
hazard?
(Notify in detail)
AP-93
200 TYPE OF IMPACTS
A Type of social impacts related to Loss of landholding/farmland;

the land acquisition under the Loss of housing;
project: Loss of structures/assets;
(Choose all that apply) Loss of crops and/or trees;
Loss of (Impacts on access to) facilities, services, or
natural resources;
Loss of businesses/enterprises;
Loss of income and/or livelihood (Specify)
Loss of access to productive assets

Others (Specify)
201 LAND OWNER/FARMLAND LOST
A Land Ownership: State-owned;

State-owned land for rental with the Certificate of Land;
State-owned land for rental with Occupancy License;
Private-owned land for rental or borrow;
Group-or community owned;
Uncertain ownership;
Illegal land occupation with Land paper;
Illegal land for production without approval.
B How many ha or m2 of land 1. Structure (…… ha, …… m2)
(Specify; paddy field (rain-fed 2. Agriculture/field (…… ha, …… m2)
and/or irrigated, tree plantation 3. Fruit orchard (…… ha, …… m2)
4. Others (…… ha, …… m2)
etc.) is to be lost by the project? Total (…… ha, …… m2)
C What % of your total income is to Less than 20 %:
be affected by losing the land? More than 20 %:
D Do you have any legal documents Yes;
for your land? No.
E If yes, type of legal document? Land Use Certificate;
Land Survey Certificate;
Provincial Land Certificate;
Temporary Land Use Certificate
Land Tax Receipt
Land Tax Return;
Land Declaration Certificate;
Permanent land paper
Whose name appears on the land
certificate
AP-94
F What types of trees and how Size of tree 1) Large (D>= 20 cm), 2) Medium (D >=
many trees are to be lost due to 10cm), 3) Small (D<10 cm)
the project? Kind of tree 1) Fruit, 2) Fire wood for self-consumption,
3) Fire wood for sale
Age of trees
Number of trees
G What % of your total income is to Less than 20 %:
be affected by losing the trees? More than 20 %:
202 HOUSING LIKELY TO BE LOST
A What is the type of house likely to be Single floor;

affected? (Choose one) Two floors;
Three floors or more
Take photo of the house. Apartment/Row house, duplex;
Small room connected to others;
Tents or temporary simple hut;
Other (Specify)
B What per cent of your house is to be Less than 20 %:

affected by the project More than 20 %:
C Roof: (Choose one) 1. Corrugated iron 2. Tiles/CPAQ
3. Natural materials;
4. Other (Specify)
D Walls: (Choose one) 1. All concrete; 2. Concrete and wood

3. All wood; 4. Natural materials;
5. Others (Specify)
E Housing ownership: Self-owned;

Owned structure for rental;
Privately owned house for rental or borrow;
Group-/Community-owned;
Illegal Occupation;
Others (Specify)
F If rented, how much do you pay per (…………………….Rupees/month)

month?
G Living area/Floor area: (…………….m2)
H Number of bedrooms:
I Age of house: (……………….year)
AP-95
203 OTHER STRUCTURES/ASSETS LIKELY TO BE LOST (PERSONAL or
COMMUNAL)
A Type of structure: 1. Residential; 2. Commercial;

(Choose all that apply) 3. Residential & Commercial;
4. Office; 5. Health facility;
6. Cattle shed; 7. Farm house;
8. Boundary wall/Fencing;
9. Church, temple or shrine;
10. Well; 11. Hand pump;
12: School;
13. Graveyard/Crematorium Ground;
14. Others (Specify)
B Address of the structure:

House No. & Street:
Units
Village
C Ownership of the structure: Self-owned;

(Choose one) State-owned structure for rental;
Privately owned house for rental or borrow;
Group-/Community-owned;
Illegal Occupation;
Others (Specify)
D What is (are) the market value of the Material Unit Total

structure(s) in the current condition?
E If rented how much do you pay per

month?
AP-96
204 ACCESS TO EXISTING FACILITIES TO BE IMPACTED
A The present conditions of the access to existing facilities and impacts on the conditions by
the project
Destination Average Frequency How do Distance Impacts by
time (a trip every): you travel (km) the project
per trip 1 day; Walk Access lost;
(minutes) 2-3 days; Bicycle Impact on
1 week; Oxcart facility
2 weeks; Horse No impact.
1 month; Truck
2 months; Motor bike;
6 months; Car
1 year. Bus
Others.
Village office
Market
School
Farmland
Hospital/Healthcare
Religion centre
Other facility
(notify)
Natural resource
(e.g. hunting,
fishing, etc.)
205 LOST BUSINESS/ENTERPRISE
A How long has the business/enterprise been Years

active? Months
B Ownership 1 Self owned/family owned 2 Company
3 Partnership (no.) 4 Other
C Nature of the Structure of the 1. Shop; 2. Storage/Warehouse; 3.Workshop;
business/enterprise? 4. Factory; 5. Others (notify)
(Choose all that apply)
D What kind of business have you been 1.
doing? (Specify) 2.
E Do you have authorized business licenses?
F How many workers are there?
AP-97
APPENDIX-27: 9.2 Financial and Economic Analysis)
27-1. Financial Cash Flow Table of SPV

1-A. Base Scenario 1: Case 2a(iii)
1-B. Base Scenario 2: Case 2a(v)
1-C. Base Scenario 3: Case 3a(v)
27-2. SPV Equity IRR for Financial Structure Variation Scenarios

2-A. Base Cases including Base Scenarios
2-B. Central and State Tax Exemption Cases
2-C. Central and State Tax Exemption + Power Tariff Reduction Cases
2-D. No FSI Contribution Cases
2-E. No FSI Contribution + Central and State Tax Exemption Cases
27-3. Financial Cash Flow Table of Base Cases for PMRC

3-A. Case P2a(iii)-1
3-B. Case P2a(v)-1
3-C. Case P3a(v)-1
27-4. Financial Cash Flow Graphs of All Analyzed Cases for PMRC
27-5. Calculation Table of Public Cost Sharing Rate to Total Initial Investment
5-A. Base Scenario 1: Case 2a(iii)+ Case P2a(iii)
5-B. Base Scenario 2: Case 2a(v)+ Case P2a(v)
5-C. Base Scenario 3: Case 3a(v)+ Case P3a(v)
27-6. Result of Financial and Economic Analysis in Case of Entirely Elevated Alignment
6-A. Project Cost
6-B. Financial and Economic Internal Rate of Return
6-C. Financial Cash Flow Graphs of PMRC (3 Base Cases)
AP-98
Appendix-27-1: Financial Cash Flow Table of SPV
1-A. Base Scenario 1: Case 2a(iii)

Conditions Evaluation Index Financing Revenue Item Price Escalation (Local Currency) Price Escalation (Foreign Currency) Note
Service Fee (% Non Fare Box
Equity FIRR % 13.3% D/E % Million Rs. of Fare Box) 95% (% of FB) 5% 2012-2028 4.20% 2012-2028 2.10% *Subsidy rate: ratio of subsidy to initial
investment cost excluding land related cost.
Net Present Value Mil. Rs. -866 Initial Investm e - 100% 28,459 FSI 含む Included 含まない 2028-2048 4.20% 2028-2048 2.10% *Corporate tax: 30%. 100% tax exemption is
(Discount rate) % 15.0% Equity 30% 21% 5,976 Expense Item Sensitibity Exchange Rate Changes (JPY/INR) applicable for 10 censecutive years out of the
SPV Investment Scope Debt 70% 49% 13,945 Concession Fee (% of FB) 0% Revenue +-％ 0% 2012-2020 +-％/Year -5.0%first 20 years of the project in infrastructure
Land acquisition, relocation Not included 含まない Subsidy＊ 30% 30% 8,538 Consultant Fee (% of Construction) 5% Initial Investment +-％ 0% 2020-2048 +-％/Year 0.0%sector.
Civil Not included 含まない Borrowing Rate 4.0% Contingency (% of Const. and Consul.) 5% 2012 Rate JPY/INR 1.50
Track Included 含む Grace Period Year 5 Tax Rate (Investment Cost) 18% Depreciation Other
E&M Included 含む Loan Period (incl. Grace Year 20 Tax Rate （O&M) 18% Civil (Year) 50 Operational Subsidy/VGF: Pre-tax loss covered
Rolling Stock Included 含む Corporate Tax* Track, E&M, Rolling Stock (Year) 30 Utility Subsidy (% of O&M) 0%
-6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045 2046 2047 2048
a Revenue 1,105 1,176 2,634 2,847 3,079 3,332 3,608 3,911 4,240 4,601 5,040 5,524 6,058 6,647 7,296 8,012 8,802 9,673 10,634 11,693 12,123 12,568 13,031 13,511 14,009 14,526 15,062 15,619 16,197 16,797
Passenger Revenue 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Service Fee Revenue 733 801 2,186 2,388 2,608 2,849 3,112 3,399 3,712 4,054 4,472 4,931 5,439 5,998 6,615 7,295 8,046 8,873 9,786 10,792 11,200 11,623 12,063 12,519 12,992 13,483 13,993 14,522 15,071 15,640
Off-rail Revenue 39 42 115 126 137 150 164 179 195 213 235 260 286 316 348 384 423 467 515 568 589 612 635 659 684 710 736 764 793 823
FSI Contribution 333 333 333 333 333 333 333 333 333 333 333 333 333 333 333 333 333 333 333 333 333 333 333 333 333 333 333 333 333 333
Other Revenue 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
b O&M expense 0 795 834 878 916 1,092 1,771 1,840 1,913 1,988 2,128 1,913 1,991 2,073 2,159 2,338 2,908 3,024 3,146 3,273 3,405 3,294 3,421 3,554 3,693 3,837 3,770 3,919 4,073 4,234 4,401
Staff cost 0 258 272 286 301 317 341 359 378 398 419 444 467 492 518 545 578 608 640 673 708 746 777 810 844 879 916 954 994 1,036 1,080
Maintenance 0 536 562 591 614 775 1,430 1,481 1,535 1,590 1,709 1,469 1,524 1,582 1,641 1,794 2,330 2,416 2,506 2,600 2,697 2,548 2,644 2,745 2,849 2,958 2,854 2,964 3,079 3,198 3,321
c (Utility subsidy) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
d Concession Fee 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
e=a-b+c-d EBITDA 0 310 342 1,757 1,931 1,986 1,561 1,768 1,998 2,252 2,473 3,127 3,532 3,984 4,488 4,958 5,105 5,778 6,527 7,361 8,288 8,829 9,147 9,476 9,818 10,172 10,755 11,144 11,546 11,963 12,395
f Depreciation 867 867 867 1,071 1,071 1,071 1,071 1,071 1,141 1,141 1,141 1,141 1,141 1,206 1,206 1,206 1,206 1,206 1,206 1,206 1,206 1,206 1,206 1,206 1,206 1,206 1,206 1,206
g Interest payment 597 557 517 478 438 398 358 318 279 239 199 159 119 80 40 -0 -0 -0
h=e-f-g Profit before tax 0 310 342 293 507 602 12 259 528 823 1,083 1,707 2,153 2,644 3,187 3,697 3,819 4,532 5,321 6,155 7,082 7,623 7,941 8,271 8,612 8,967 9,550 9,938 10,340 10,757 11,190
i (Operational VGF/subsidy) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
j Corporate Tax 93 103 88 152 181 4 78 159 247 325 512 646 793 956 1,109 1,146 1,360 1,596 1,847 2,125 2,287 2,382 2,481 2,584 2,690 2,865 2,981 3,102 3,227 3,357
k Tax adjustment 159 247 325 512 646 793 956 1,109 1,146 1,360
l=h+i-j+k Profit after tax 0 217 240 205 355 421 8 181 528 823 1,083 1,707 2,153 2,644 3,187 3,697 3,819 4,532 3,725 4,309 4,958 5,336 5,559 5,789 6,029 6,277 6,685 6,956 7,238 7,530 7,833
m Equity 0 0 344 2,005 2,388 1,039 201 -4,424

n Debt 0 0 803 4,677 5,571 2,424 469
o Subsidies 0 0 492 2,864 3,411 1,484 287
p Investment 0 0 1,639 9,545 11,369 4,947 958 6,398 2,184 2,019 0 0 0 -4,424
(pa) Initial investment 0 0 1,639 9,545 11,369 4,947 958
(pb) Additional investment 6,398 2,184 2,019 0 0 0 0
q IDC 0 0 16 126 334 503
AP-99
r Debt outstanding 0 0 803 5,497 11,194 13,952 14,924 13,929 12,934 11,939 10,944 9,949 8,954 7,959 6,964 5,969 4,975 3,980 2,985 1,990 995 -0 -0 -0 -0
s Debt repayment 995 995 995 995 995 995 995 995 995 995 995 995 995 995 995 0 0 0
Cash flow available for debt
t=f+g+l 0 0 0 0 0 217 240 1,669 1,779 1,806 1,557 1,690 1,998 2,252 2,473 3,127 3,532 3,984 4,488 4,958 5,105 5,778 4,931 5,514 6,163 6,542 6,765 6,995 7,234 7,482 7,891 8,162 8,444 8,736 9,038
service
u=t/(g+s) Debt service coverage ratio 1.05 1.15 1.19 1.06 1.18 1.43 1.66 1.88 2.46 2.86 3.34 3.89 4.45 4.75 5.58 0.00 0.00 0.00
Loan Life Coverage Ratio 0.93 1.03 1.14 1.27 1.45 1.66 1.90 2.17 2.50 2.83 3.20 3.60 4.01 4.43 5.05
Cash flow after repayment of

v=l+f-s-pb 0 0 0 0 0 217 240 77 227 -6,105 85 258 605 899 -1,025 1,853 2,299 2,791 3,334 1,824 4,030 4,743 4,931 5,514 6,163 6,542 6,765 6,995 7,234 7,482 7,891 8,162 8,444 8,736 9,038
interest and principal
v=e-p NCF for Project IRR 0 0 0 -1,639 -9,545 -11,369 -4,637 -615 1,757 1,931 -4,412 1,561 1,768 1,998 2,252 288 3,127 3,532 3,984 4,488 2,938 5,105 5,778 6,527 7,361 8,288 8,829 9,147 9,476 9,818 10,172 10,755 11,144 11,546 11,963 16,819
w=v-m NCF for Equity IRR 0 0 0 -344 -2,005 -2,388 -822 39 77 227 -6,105 85 258 605 899 -1,025 1,853 2,299 2,791 3,334 1,824 4,030 4,743 4,931 5,514 6,163 6,542 6,765 6,995 7,234 7,482 7,891 8,162 8,444 8,736 13,462
Accumulated NCF for E.IRR 0 0 -344 -2,349 -4,736 -5,558 -5,520 -5,443 -5,216 -11,321 -11,236 -10,978 -10,373 -9,474 -10,499 -8,645 -6,347 -3,556 -222 1,601 5,632 10,375 15,305 20,820 26,983 33,525 40,290 47,285 54,519 62,002 69,892 78,054 86,498 95,234 108,696
Project FIRR: 9.1% NPV: -7,556 @ 15%
Equity FIRR: 13.3% NPV: -866 @ 15%
DSCR Average 2.35
Source: Study Team

1-B. Base Scenario 2: Case 2a(v)
Net Present Value Mil. Rs. 621 Initial Investme - 100% 28,459 FSI 含む Included 含まない 2028-2048 4.20% 2028-2048 2.10% *Corporate tax: 30%. 100% tax exemption is
SPV Investment Scope Debt 70% 35% 9,961 Concession Fee (% of FB) 0% Revenue +-％ 0% 2012-2020 +-％/Year -5.0%first 20 years of the project in infrastructure
Land acquisition, relocation Not included 含まない Subsidy＊ 50% 50% 14,229 Consultant Fee (% of Construction) 5% Initial Investment +-％ 0% 2020-2048 +-％/Year 0.0%sector.
Civil Not included 含まない Borrowing Rate 4.0% Contingency (% of Const. and Consul. 5% 2012 Rate JPY/INR 1.50
Track Included 含む Grace Period Year 5 Tax Rate (Investment Cost) 18% Depreciation Other
-6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045 2046 2047 2048
a Revenue 1,105 1,176 2,634 2,847 3,079 3,332 3,608 3,911 4,240 4,601 5,040 5,524 6,058 6,647 7,296 8,012 8,802 9,673 10,634 11,693 12,123 12,568 13,031 13,511 14,009 14,526 15,062 15,619 16,197 16,797
Off-rail Revenue 39 42 115 126 137 150 164 179 195 213 235 260 286 316 348 384 423 467 515 568 589 612 635 659 684 710 736 764 793 823
Other Revenue 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
b O&M expense 0 795 834 878 916 1,092 1,771 1,840 1,913 1,988 2,128 1,913 1,991 2,073 2,159 2,338 2,908 3,024 3,146 3,273 3,405 3,294 3,421 3,554 3,693 3,837 3,770 3,919 4,073 4,234 4,401
Staff cost 0 258 272 286 301 317 341 359 378 398 419 444 467 492 518 545 578 608 640 673 708 746 777 810 844 879 916 954 994 1,036 1,080
Maintenance 0 536 562 591 614 775 1,430 1,481 1,535 1,590 1,709 1,469 1,524 1,582 1,641 1,794 2,330 2,416 2,506 2,600 2,697 2,548 2,644 2,745 2,849 2,958 2,854 2,964 3,079 3,198 3,321
d Concession Fee 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
e=a-b+c-d EBITDA 0 310 342 1,757 1,931 1,986 1,561 1,768 1,998 2,252 2,473 3,127 3,532 3,984 4,488 4,958 5,105 5,778 6,527 7,361 8,288 8,829 9,147 9,476 9,818 10,172 10,755 11,144 11,546 11,963 12,395
f Depreciation 867 867 867 1,071 1,071 1,071 1,071 1,071 1,141 1,141 1,141 1,141 1,141 1,206 1,206 1,206 1,206 1,206 1,206 1,206 1,206 1,206 1,206 1,206 1,206 1,206 1,206 1,206
g Interest payment 426 398 370 341 313 284 256 227 199 171 142 114 85 57 28 0 0 0
h=e-f-g Profit before tax 0 310 342 464 666 750 148 384 642 925 1,174 1,787 2,221 2,701 3,233 3,731 3,842 4,544 5,321 6,155 7,082 7,623 7,941 8,271 8,612 8,967 9,550 9,938 10,340 10,757 11,190
i (Operational VGF/subsidy) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
j Corporate Tax 93 103 139 200 225 45 115 193 278 352 536 666 810 970 1,119 1,153 1,363 1,596 1,847 2,125 2,287 2,382 2,481 2,584 2,690 2,865 2,981 3,102 3,227 3,357
k Tax adjustment 193 278 352 536 666 810 970 1,119 1,153 1,363
l=h+i-j+k Profit after tax 0 217 240 325 467 525 104 269 642 925 1,174 1,787 2,221 2,701 3,233 3,731 3,842 4,544 3,725 4,309 4,958 5,336 5,559 5,789 6,029 6,277 6,685 6,956 7,238 7,530 7,833
m Equity 0 0 246 1,432 1,705 742 144 -4,424

n Debt 0 0 574 3,341 3,979 1,732 335
o Subsidies 0 0 820 4,773 5,685 2,474 479
p Investment 0 0 1,639 9,545 11,369 4,947 958 6,398 2,184 2,019 0 0 0 -4,424
q IDC 0 0 11 90 238 359
r Debt outstanding 0 0 574 3,926 7,995 9,965 10,660 9,949 9,238 8,528 7,817 7,106 6,396 5,685 4,975 4,264 3,553 2,843 2,132 1,421 711 0 0 0 0
s Debt repayment 711 711 711 711 711 711 711 711 711 711 711 711 711 711 711 0 0 0
g Interest payment 426 398 370 341 313 284 256 227 199 171 142 114 85 57 28 0 0 0
t=f+g+l 0 0 0 0 0 217 240 1,618 1,731 1,761 1,516 1,653 1,998 2,252 2,473 3,127 3,532 3,984 4,488 4,958 5,105 5,778 4,931 5,514 6,163 6,542 6,765 6,995 7,234 7,482 7,891 8,162 8,444 8,736 9,038
service
AP-100

v=l+f-s-pb 0 0 0 0 0 217 240 481 623 -5,717 465 629 1,003 1,286 -650 2,217 2,651 3,132 3,663 2,142 4,337 5,039 4,931 5,514 6,163 6,542 6,765 6,995 7,234 7,482 7,891 8,162 8,444 8,736 9,038
w=v-m NCF for Equity IRR 0 0 0 -246 -1,432 -1,705 -525 96 481 623 -5,717 465 629 1,003 1,286 -650 2,217 2,651 3,132 3,663 2,142 4,337 5,039 4,931 5,514 6,163 6,542 6,765 6,995 7,234 7,482 7,891 8,162 8,444 8,736 13,462
Accumulated NCF for E.IRR 0 0 -246 -1,678 -3,383 -3,908 -3,812 -3,332 -2,709 -8,426 -7,961 -7,332 -6,329 -5,043 -5,693 -3,476 -824 2,307 5,971 8,113 12,450 17,489 22,420 27,934 34,097 40,639 47,404 54,399 61,634 69,116 77,006 85,169 93,612 102,348 115,810
Project FIRR: 9.1% NPV: -7,556 @ 15%
Equity FIRR: 16.6% NPV: 621 @ 15%
DSCR Average 3.27
Source: Study Team

1-C. Base Scenario 3: Case 3a(v)
Net Present Value Mil. Rs. 1,013 Initial Investme - 100% 25,147 FSI 含む Included 含まない 2028-2048 4.20% 2028-2048 2.10% *Corporate tax: 30%. 100% tax exemption is
SPV Investment Scope Debt 70% 35% 8,802 Concession Fee (% of FB) 0% Revenue +-％ 0% 2012-2020 +-％/Year -5.0% first 20 years of the project in infrastructure
Land acquisition, relocation Not included 含まない Subsidy＊ 50% 50% 12,574 Consultant Fee (% of Construction) 5% Initial Investment +-％ 0% 2020-2048 +-％/Year 0.0% sector.
Civil Not included 含まない Borrowing Rate 4.0% Contingency (% of Const. and Consul.) 5% 2012 Rate JPY/INR 1.50
Track Not included 含まない Grace Period Year 5 Tax Rate (Investment Cost) 18% Depreciation Other
-6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045 2046 2047 2048
a Revenue 1,105 1,176 2,634 2,847 3,079 3,332 3,608 3,911 4,240 4,601 5,040 5,524 6,058 6,647 7,296 8,012 8,802 9,673 10,634 11,693 12,123 12,568 13,031 13,511 14,009 14,526 15,062 15,619 16,197 16,797
Off-rail Revenue 39 42 115 126 137 150 164 179 195 213 235 260 286 316 348 384 423 467 515 568 589 612 635 659 684 710 736 764 793 823
Other Revenue 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
b O&M expense 0 795 834 878 916 1,092 1,771 1,840 1,913 1,988 2,128 1,913 1,991 2,073 2,159 2,338 2,908 3,024 3,146 3,273 3,405 3,294 3,421 3,554 3,693 3,837 3,770 3,919 4,073 4,234 4,401
Staff cost 0 258 272 286 301 317 341 359 378 398 419 444 467 492 518 545 578 608 640 673 708 746 777 810 844 879 916 954 994 1,036 1,080
Maintenance 0 536 562 591 614 775 1,430 1,481 1,535 1,590 1,709 1,469 1,524 1,582 1,641 1,794 2,330 2,416 2,506 2,600 2,697 2,548 2,644 2,745 2,849 2,958 2,854 2,964 3,079 3,198 3,321
d Concession Fee 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
e=a-b+c-d EBITDA 0 310 342 1,757 1,931 1,986 1,561 1,768 1,998 2,252 2,473 3,127 3,532 3,984 4,488 4,958 5,105 5,778 6,527 7,361 8,288 8,829 9,147 9,476 9,818 10,172 10,755 11,144 11,546 11,963 12,395
f Depreciation 766 766 766 970 970 970 970 970 1,040 1,040 1,040 1,040 1,040 1,105 1,105 1,105 1,105 1,105 1,105 1,105 1,105 1,105 1,105 1,105 1,105 1,105 1,105 1,105
h=e-f-g Profit before tax 0 310 342 614 814 894 289 521 776 1,056 1,301 1,911 2,341 2,819 3,347 3,842 3,950 4,648 5,422 6,256 7,183 7,724 8,042 8,372 8,713 9,067 9,651 10,039 10,441 10,858 11,290
i Operational VGF/subsidy 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
j Corporate Tax 93 103 184 244 268 87 156 233 317 390 573 702 846 1,004 1,153 1,185 1,394 1,627 1,877 2,155 2,317 2,413 2,511 2,614 2,720 2,895 3,012 3,132 3,257 3,387
k Tax adjustment 233 317 390 573 702 846 1,004 1,153 1,185 1,394
l=h+i-j+k Profit after tax 0 217 240 430 570 626 202 365 776 1,056 1,301 1,911 2,341 2,819 3,347 3,842 3,950 4,648 3,796 4,379 5,028 5,407 5,629 5,860 6,099 6,347 6,755 7,027 7,309 7,601 7,903
m Equity 0 0 180 1,292 1,532 685 84 -4,222

n Debt 0 0 419 3,015 3,574 1,598 195
o Subsidies 0 0 599 4,308 5,106 2,283 278
p Investment 0 0 1,197 8,616 10,211 4,566 557 6,398 2,184 2,019 0 0 0 -4,222
q IDC 0 0 8 77 211 320
r Debt outstanding 0 0 419 3,443 7,094 8,903 9,418 8,790 8,162 7,534 6,906 6,279 5,651 5,023 4,395 3,767 3,139 2,511 1,884 1,256 628 -0 -0 -0 -0
s Debt repayment 628 628 628 628 628 628 628 628 628 628 628 628 628 628 628 0 0 0
t=f+g+l 0 0 0 0 0 217 240 1,573 1,687 1,718 1,474 1,612 1,998 2,252 2,473 3,127 3,532 3,984 4,488 4,958 5,105 5,778 4,900 5,484 6,133 6,512 6,734 6,965 7,204 7,452 7,860 8,132 8,414 8,705 9,008
service
AP-101
v=l+f-s-pb 0 0 0 0 0 217 240 568 708 -5,634 545 708 1,119 1,398 -540 2,323 2,754 3,231 3,759 2,235 4,427 5,125 4,900 5,484 6,133 6,512 6,734 6,965 7,204 7,452 7,860 8,132 8,414 8,705 9,008
w=v-m NCF for Equity IRR 0 0 0 -180 -1,292 -1,532 -468 156 568 708 -5,634 545 708 1,119 1,398 -540 2,323 2,754 3,231 3,759 2,235 4,427 5,125 4,900 5,484 6,133 6,512 6,734 6,965 7,204 7,452 7,860 8,132 8,414 8,705 13,230
Accumulated NCF for E.IRR 0 0 -180 -1,472 -3,004 -3,472 -3,316 -2,748 -2,040 -7,674 -7,129 -6,422 -5,303 -3,905 -4,445 -2,122 632 3,863 7,623 9,858 14,284 19,409 24,310 29,794 35,927 42,439 49,173 56,138 63,342 70,794 78,654 86,786 95,200 103,905 117,135
Project FIRR: 9.8% NPV: -6,067 @ 15%
Equity FIRR: 17.8% NPV: 1,013 @ 15%
DSCR Average 3.68
Source: Study Team

Appendix-27-2: SPV Equity IRR for Financial Structure Variation Scenarios
2-A. Base Cases including Base Scenarios
Case Case 1a(i) Case 1a(ii) Case 1a(iii) Case 2a(i) Case 2a(ii) Case 2a(iii) Case 2a(iv) Case 2a(v) Case 3a(i) Case 3a(ii) Case 3a(iii) Case 3a(iv) Case 3a(v)
Sector
Public Land Acquisition Land Acquisition Land Acquisition Land Acquisition Land Acquisition Land Acquisition Land Acquisition Land Acquisition Land Acquisition Land Acquisition
Civil Work Civil Work Civil Work Civil Work Civil Work Civil Work Civil Work Civil Work Civil Work Civil Work
Track Work Track Work Track Work Track Work Track Work
SPV Land Acquisition Land Acquisition Land Acquisition Track Work Track Work Track Work Track Work Track Work E&M E&M E&M E&M E&M
Civil Work Civil Work Civil Work E&M E&M E&M E&M E&M Rolling Stock Rolling Stock Rolling Stock Rolling Stock Rolling Stock
Track Work Track Work Track Work Rolling Stock Rolling Stock Rolling Stock Rolling Stock Rolling Stock
E&M E&M E&M
Rolling Stock Rolling Stock Rolling Stock
20% of Initial 40% of Initial 50% of Initial 10% of Initial 20% of Initial 30% of Initial 40% of Initial 50% of Initial 10% of Initial 20% of Initial 30% of Initial 40% of Initial 50% of Initial
Government Subsidy
Investment Investment Investment Investment Investment Investment Investment Investment Investment Investment Investment Investment Investment
Non-Fare Box Revenue 5% of Fare Box 5% of Fare Box 5% of Fare Box 5% of Fare Box 5% of Fare Box 5% of Fare Box 5% of Fare Box 5% of Fare Box 5% of Fare Box 5% of Fare Box 5% of Fare Box 5% of Fare Box 5% of Fare Box
SPV Financing
Debt: Equity 70:30 70:30 70:30 70:30 70:30 70:30 70:30 70:30 70:30 70:30 70:30 70:30 70:30
Borrowing Rate 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0%
Term (grace period) 22 (7) years 22 (7) years 22 (7) years 20 (5) years 20 (5) years 20 (5) years 20 (5) years 20 (5) years 20 (5) years 20 (5) years 20 (5) years 20 (5) years 20 (5) years
Equity IRR- Fare Box Rev. 6.5% 8.5% 9.8% - - - - - - - - - -
Equity IRR- Service Fee Revenue: 100% of Fare box collected 11.7% 12.8% 14.1% 15.7% 17.6% 12.8% 13.9% 15.3% 16.9% 18.9%
Source: Study Team
AP-102
2-B. Central and State Tax Exemption Cases
Sector
E&M E&M E&M
Government Subsidy
SPV Financing
Debt: Equity 70:30 70:30 70:30 70:30 70:30 70:30 70:30 70:30 70:30 70:30 70:30 70:30 70:30
Borrowing Rate 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0%
Source: Study Team
2-C. Central and State Tax Exemption + Power Tariff Reduction Cases
Sector
E&M E&M E&M
Government Subsidy
SPV Financing
Debt: Equity 70:30 70:30 70:30 70:30 70:30 70:30 70:30 70:30 70:30 70:30 70:30 70:30 70:30
Borrowing Rate 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0%
Source: Study Team
2-D. No FSI Contribution Cases
AP-103
Sector
E&M E&M E&M
Government Subsidy
SPV Financing
Debt: Equity 70:30 70:30 70:30 70:30 70:30 70:30 70:30 70:30 70:30 70:30 70:30 70:30 70:30
Borrowing Rate 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0%
Source: Study Team
2-E. No FSI Contribution + Central and State Tax Exemption Cases
Sector
E&M E&M E&M
Government Subsidy
SPV Financing
Debt: Equity 70:30 70:30 70:30 70:30 70:30 70:30 70:30 70:30 70:30 70:30 70:30 70:30 70:30
Borrowing Rate 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0%
Source: Study Team
AP-104
Appendix-27-3: Financial Cash Flow Table of Base Cases for PMRC
3-A. Case P2a(iii)-1

Equity FIRR % #NUM! % Million Rs. Non Fare Box (% of FB) 0% 2012-2028 4.20% 2012-2028 2.10% *Corporate tax: 30%. 100% tax exemption is
Net Present Value Mil. Rs. -7,850 Initial Investment 100% 29,235 Other 含まない Not included 含まない 2028-2048 4.20% 2028-2048 2.10% applicable for 10 censecutive years out of the
(Discount rate) % 15.0% Equity 43% 12,621 Expense Item Sensitibity Exchange Rate Changes (JPY/INR) first 20 years of the project in infrastructure
Public Investment Scope Debt 57% 16,614 Service Fee Payment (% of FB) 95% Revenue +-％ 0% 2012-2020 +-％/Year -5.0% sector.
Land acquisition, relocatio Included 含む (PMC/PCMC/MIDC) 19% 5,501 Consultant Fee (% of Construction) 5% Initial Investment +-％ 0% 2020-2048 +-％/Year 0.0%
Civil Included 含む (Central and State) 24% 7,120 Contingency (% of Const. and Consul.) 5% 2012 Rate JPY/INR 1.50
Track Not included 含まない Borrowing Rate 1.4% Tax Rate (Investment Cost) 18% Depreciation SPVへの補助
E&M Not included 含まない Grace Period Year 10 Tax Rate （O&M) 18% Civil (Year) 50 Investment/ Operational subsidy 適宜入力
Rolling Stock Not included 含まない Loan Period (incl. Grace) Year 30 管理費（運賃収入比） 0% Track, E&M, Rolling Stock (Year) 30 Utility subsidy (SPVのO&M費比） 0%
-6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045 2046 2047 2048
a Revenue 772 843 2,301 2,514 2,746 2,999 3,275 3,578 3,907 4,268 4,707 5,191 5,725 6,314 6,963 7,679 8,469 9,340 10,301 11,360 11,790 12,235 12,698 13,178 13,676 14,193 14,729 15,286 15,864 16,464
Passenger Revenue 772 843 2,301 2,514 2,746 2,999 3,275 3,578 3,907 4,268 4,707 5,191 5,725 6,314 6,963 7,679 8,469 9,340 10,301 11,360 11,790 12,235 12,698 13,178 13,676 14,193 14,729 15,286 15,864 16,464
Off-rail Revenue 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Other Revenue 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Other Revenue 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
b Service fee payment 733 801 2,186 2,388 2,608 2,849 3,112 3,399 3,712 4,054 4,472 4,931 5,439 5,998 6,615 7,295 8,046 8,873 9,786 10,792 11,200 11,623 12,063 12,519 12,992 13,483 13,993 14,522 15,071 15,640
c Subsidy to SPV 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
d Administrative cost 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
e Asset transfer from SPV 4,424
f=a-b-c-d EBITDA 0 39 42 115 126 137 150 164 179 195 213 235 260 286 316 348 384 423 467 515 568 589 612 635 659 684 710 736 764 793 -3,600
g=d-e-f Depreciation 434 434 434 434 434 434 434 434 434 434 434 434 434 434 434 434 434 434 434 434 434 434 434 434 434 434 434 434
h Interest payment 0 11 67 154 210 233 233 233 233 233 233 221 209 198 186 174 163 151 140 128 116 105 93 81 70 58 47 35 23 12 0
i=f-g-h Profit before tax 0 -11 -67 -115 -168 -551 -541 -529 -516 -503 -487 -459 -430 -396 -360 -322 -281 -237 -189 -138 -83 -23 41 74 108 143 179 215 253 291 331 359 -4,034
j Corporate Tax 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 22 32 43 54 65 76 87 99 108 0
k Tax adjustment 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
l=i-j+k Profit after tax 0 -11 -67 -115 -168 -551 -541 -529 -516 -503 -487 -459 -430 -396 -360 -322 -281 -237 -189 -138 -83 -23 29 52 76 100 125 151 177 204 231 252 -4,034
m Government budget 1,425 2,529 2,214 2,779 2,534 905 236 0

PMC/PCMC/MIDC 621 1,102 965 1,211 1,104 394 103
Central/State 804 1,427 1,249 1,568 1,429 511 133
n Debt 0 0 1,556 6,484 5,912 2,112 550
o Investment 1,425 2,529 3,769 9,263 8,445 3,017 786 0 0 0 0
AP-105
Initial investment 1,425 2,529 3,769 9,263 8,445 3,017 786
Additional investment 0 0 0
p IDC
q Debt outstanding 0 0 1,556 8,040 13,952 16,064 16,614 16,614 16,614 16,614 16,614 16,614 15,783 14,953 14,122 13,291 12,460 11,630 10,799 9,968 9,138 8,307 7,476 6,646 5,815 4,984 4,153 3,323 2,492 1,661 831 0
r Debt repayment 831 831 831 831 831 831 831 831 831 831 831 831 831 831 831 831 831 831 831 831
s=g+h+l 0 0 0 0 0 39 42 115 126 137 150 164 179 195 213 235 260 286 316 348 384 423 467 515 556 567 579 592 605 619 634 649 665 685 -3,600
service
t=s/(h+r) Debt service coverage ratio 0.49 0.54 0.59 0.64 0.70 0.17 0.19 0.21 0.23 0.26 0.28 0.32 0.35 0.40 0.44 0.49 0.55 0.60 0.62 0.64 0.67 0.69 0.72 0.74 0.77
Loan Life Coverage Ratio

u=l+g-r 0 0 0 -11 -67 -115 -168 -118 -107 -95 -83 -69 -884 -856 -827 -793 -757 -719 -678 -634 -586 -535 -480 -420 -368 -345 -321 -297 -272 -246 -220 -193 665 685 -3,600
v=f-o NCF for Project IRR 0 -1,425 -2,529 -3,769 -9,263 -8,445 -2,979 -744 115 126 137 150 164 179 195 213 235 260 286 316 348 384 423 467 515 568 589 612 635 659 684 710 736 764 793 -3,600
w=u-m NCF for Equity IRR 0 -1,425 -2,529 -2,214 -2,790 -2,601 -1,020 -404 -118 -107 -95 -83 -69 -884 -856 -827 -793 -757 -719 -678 -634 -586 -535 -480 -420 -368 -345 -321 -297 -272 -246 -220 -193 665 685 -3,600
Accumulated NCF for E.IRR -1,425 -3,954 -6,167 -8,957 -11,558 -12,578 -12,982 -13,099 -13,206 -13,302 -13,384 -13,453 -14,338 -15,194 -16,021 -16,814 -17,571 -18,290 -18,968 -19,601 -20,188 -20,723 -21,203 -21,623 -21,991 -22,336 -22,657 -22,954 -23,226 -23,472 -23,693 -23,886 -23,221 -22,535 -26,136
Project FIRR: -8.5% NPV: -14,052 @ 15%
Equity FIRR: #NUM! NPV: -7,850 @ 15%
Source: Study Team

3-B. Case P2a(v)-1
Equity FIRR % #NUM! % Million Rs. Non Fare Box (% of FB) 0% 2012-2028 4.20% 2012-2028年 2.10% *Corporate tax: 30%. 100% tax exemption is
Net Present Value Mil. Rs. -9,625 Initial Investment 100% 29,235 Other 含まない Not included 含まない 2028-2048 4.20% 2028-2048年 2.10% applicable for 10 censecutive years out of the
Public Investment Scope Debt 41% 11,867 Service Fee Payment (% of FB) 95% Revenue +-％ 0% 2012-2020年 +-％/Year -5.0% sector.
Land acquisition, relocatioIncluded 含む (PMC/PCMC/MIDC) 19% 5,501 Consultant Fee (% of Construction) 5% Initial Investment +-％ 0% 2020-2048年 +-％/Year 0.0%
Track Not included 含まない Borrowing Rate 1.4% Tax Rate (Investment Cost) 18% Depreciation SPVへの補助
-6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045 2046 2047 2048
a Revenue 772 843 2,301 2,514 2,746 2,999 3,275 3,578 3,907 4,268 4,707 5,191 5,725 6,314 6,963 7,679 8,469 9,340 10,301 11,360 11,790 12,235 12,698 13,178 13,676 14,193 14,729 15,286 15,864 16,464
Off-rail Revenue 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Other Revenue 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Other Revenue 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
c Subsidy to SPV 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
f=a-b-c-d EBITDA 0 39 42 115 126 137 150 164 179 195 213 235 260 286 316 348 384 423 467 515 568 589 612 635 659 684 710 736 764 793 -3,600
i=f-g-h Profit before tax 0 -8 -48 -71 -108 -485 -474 -463 -450 -436 -421 -396 -370 -340 -307 -272 -234 -194 -149 -102 -50 7 68 98 128 160 192 225 259 294 331 359 -4,034
j Corporate Tax 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 20 29 38 48 58 68 78 88 99 108 0
k Tax adjustment 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
l=i-j+k Profit after tax 0 -8 -48 -71 -108 -485 -474 -463 -450 -436 -421 -396 -370 -340 -307 -272 -234 -194 -149 -102 -50 5 47 68 90 112 134 158 182 206 231 252 -4,034
m Government budget 1,425 2,529 2,658 4,631 4,223 1,509 393 0

PMC/PCMC/MIDC 451 801 842 1,467 1,337 478 124
Central/State 973 1,728 1,816 3,165 2,885 1,031 269
n Debt 0 0 1,111 4,631 4,223 1,509 393
o Investment 1,425 2,529 3,769 9,263 8,445 3,017 786 0 0 0 0

Initial investment 1,425 2,529 3,769 9,263 8,445 3,017 786
p IDC
r Debt repayment 593 593 593 593 593 593 593 593 593 593 593 593 593 593 593 593 593 593 593 593
s=g+h+l 0 0 0 0 0 39 42 115 126 137 150 164 179 195 213 235 260 286 316 348 384 423 467 513 548 560 573 587 601 616 632 648 665 685 -3,600
service

u=l+g-r 0 0 0 -8 -48 -71 -108 -51 -40 -29 -16 -2 -581 -556 -529 -499 -467 -432 -394 -353 -309 -261 -209 -155 -112 -91 -70 -48 -25 -2 22 46 665 685 -3,600
AP-106
v=f-o NCF for Project IRR 0 -1,425 -2,529 -3,769 -9,263 -8,445 -2,979 -744 115 126 137 150 164 179 195 213 235 260 286 316 348 384 423 467 515 568 589 612 635 659 684 710 736 764 793 -3,600
w=u-m NCF for Equity IRR 0 -1,425 -2,529 -2,658 -4,639 -4,271 -1,580 -501 -51 -40 -29 -16 -2 -581 -556 -529 -499 -467 -432 -394 -353 -309 -261 -209 -155 -112 -91 -70 -48 -25 -2 22 46 665 685 -3,600
Project FIRR: -8.5% NPV: -14,052 @ 15%
Source: Study Team

3-C. Case P3a(v)-1
Equity FIRR % #NUM! % Million Rs. Non Fare Box (% of FB) 0% 2012-2028 4.20% 2012-2028年 2.10% *Corporate tax: 30%. 100% tax exemption is
Net Present Value Mil. Rs. -10,538 Initial Investment 100% 32,546 Other 含まない Not included 含まない 2028-2048 4.20% 2028-2048年 2.10% applicable for 10 censecutive years out of the
Public Investment Scope Debt 42% 13,523 Service Fee Payment (% of FB) 95% Revenue +-％ 0% 2012-2020年 +-％/Year -5.0% sector.
Land acquisition, relocatioIncluded 含む (PMC/PCMC/MIDC) 17% 5,501 Consultant Fee (% of Construction) 5% Initial Investment +-％ 0% 2020-2048年 +-％/Year 0.0%
Track Included 含む Borrowing Rate 1.4% Tax Rate (Investment Cost) 18% Depreciation SPVへの補助
-6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045 2046 2047 2048
a Revenue 772 843 2,301 2,514 2,746 2,999 3,275 3,578 3,907 4,268 4,707 5,191 5,725 6,314 6,963 7,679 8,469 9,340 10,301 11,360 11,790 12,235 12,698 13,178 13,676 14,193 14,729 15,286 15,864 16,464
Off-rail Revenue 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Other Revenue 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Other Revenue 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
c Subsidy to SPV 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
f=a-b-c-d EBITDA 0 39 42 115 126 137 150 164 179 195 213 235 260 286 316 348 384 423 467 515 568 589 612 635 659 684 710 736 764 793 -3,981
i=f-g-h Profit before tax 0 -9 -54 -86 -129 -614 -603 -592 -579 -565 -550 -524 -496 -464 -430 -394 -355 -313 -267 -218 -165 -107 -44 -13 19 52 85 120 156 192 230 259 -4,516
j Corporate Tax 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 16 26 36 47 58 69 78 0
k Tax adjustment 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
l=i-j+k Profit after tax 0 -9 -54 -86 -129 -614 -603 -592 -579 -565 -550 -524 -496 -464 -430 -394 -355 -313 -267 -218 -165 -107 -44 -13 13 36 60 84 109 135 161 181 -4,516
m Government budget 1,425 2,529 2,879 5,096 4,802 1,699 593 0

PMC/PCMC/MIDC 412 731 833 1,474 1,388 491 172
Central/State 1,013 1,798 2,047 3,623 3,413 1,208 422
n Debt 0 0 1,332 5,096 4,802 1,699 593
o Investment 1,425 2,529 4,212 10,192 9,603 3,398 1,187 0 0 0 0

Initial investment 1,425 2,529 4,212 10,192 9,603 3,398 1,187
p IDC 0 0 9 54 124 171
r Debt repayment 694 694 694 694 694 694 694 694 694 694 694 694 694 694 694 694 694 694 694 694
s=g+h+l 0 0 0 0 0 39 42 115 126 137 150 164 179 195 213 235 260 286 316 348 384 423 467 515 568 589 606 619 633 648 663 679 695 716 -3,981
service

u=l+g-r 0 0 0 -9 -54 -86 -129 -79 -69 -57 -44 -31 -710 -683 -656 -624 -590 -554 -514 -472 -427 -378 -324 -266 -204 -173 -146 -123 -100 -75 -51 -25 695 716 -3,981
AP-107
v=f-o NCF for Project IRR 0 -1,425 -2,529 -4,212 -10,192 -9,603 -3,360 -1,144 115 126 137 150 164 179 195 213 235 260 286 316 348 384 423 467 515 568 589 612 635 659 684 710 736 764 793 -3,981
w=u-m NCF for Equity IRR 0 -1,425 -2,529 -2,879 -5,106 -4,856 -1,785 -722 -79 -69 -57 -44 -31 -710 -683 -656 -624 -590 -554 -514 -472 -427 -378 -324 -266 -204 -173 -146 -123 -100 -75 -51 -25 695 716 -3,981
Project FIRR: #NUM! NPV: -15,544 @ 15%
Source: Study Team

Appendix-27-4: Financial Cash Flow Graphs of All Analyzed Cases for PMRC
Public (PMRC) SPV

Initial
Financing sources
Case Undertaking Investment Undertaking Case
(Mil. Rs)
Cost (Mil. Rs)
Case P2a(iii)-1 Land 29,235 PMC/PCMC/MIDC 5,501 18.8% Track work Case 2a(iii)
Civil work VGF State government 3,560 12.2% E&M * 30% of initial investment subsidized by public
VGF Central government 3,560 12.2% Rolling Stock * 95% of fare box revenue is received as service fee
Debt (JICA ODA loan) 16,614 56.8% SPV equity IRR: 13.3%
Investment cost and financing sources

2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total % *Terms of JICA ODA loan
Total investment Mil. Rs. 1,425 2,529 3,769 9,263 8,445 3,017 786 29,235 100% Borrowing rate: 1.4%
Debt Mil. Rs. 0 0 1,556 6,484 5,912 2,112 550 16,614 57% Loan (grace) period: 30(10) years
Central Government Mil. Rs. 402 713 624 784 715 255 67 3,560 12%
State Government Mil. Rs. 402 713 624 784 715 255 67 3,560 12%
PMC/PCMC/MIDC Mil. Rs. 621 1,102 965 1,211 1,104 394 103 5,501 19%
Net cash flow for equity IRR

2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
2036
2037
2038
2039
2040
2041
2042
2043
2044
2045
2046
2047
2048
(Million Rs.)
1000
500
0
-500
-1000
-1500
-2000 Debt service (interest + repayment)
-2500 Government investment + subsidy
-3000
-3500
-4000
Source: Study Team
Public (PMRC) SPV

Initial
Financing sources
(Mil. Rs)
Cost (Mil. Rs)
Debt (Commercial loan) 16,614 56.8% SPV equity IRR: 13.3%

2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total % *Terms of commercial loan
Total investment Mil. Rs. 1,425 2,529 3,769 9,263 8,445 3,017 786 29,235 100% Borrowing rate: 12%
PMC/PCMC/MIDC Mil. Rs. 621 1,102 965 1,211 1,104 394 103 5,501 19%

2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
2036
2037
2038
2039
2040
2041
2042
2043
2044
2045
2046
2047
2048
(Million Rs.)
1000
-1000
-2000
Debt service (interest + repayment)
-3000
Government investment + subsidy
-4000 Net cash flow for equity IRR
-5000
Source: Study Team
AP-108
Public (PMRC) SPV
Initial
Financing sources
(Mil. Rs)
Cost (Mil. Rs)
Case P2a(v)-1 Land 29,235 PMC/PCMC/MIDC 5,501 18.8% Track work Case 2a(v)

Total investment Mil. Rs. 1,425 2,529 3,769 9,263 8,445 3,017 786 29,235 100% Borrowing rate: 1.4%
Central Government Mil. Rs. 487 864 908 1,582 1,443 515 134 5,933 20%
State Government Mil. Rs. 487 864 908 1,582 1,443 515 134 5,933 20%
PMC/PCMC/MIDC Mil. Rs. 451 801 842 1,467 1,337 478 124 5,501 19%

2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
2036
2037
2038
2039
2040
2041
2042
2043
2044
2045
2046
2047
2048
(Million Rs.)
1000
-1000
-2000
-5000
Source: Study Team
Public (PMRC) SPV

Initial
Financing sources
(Mil. Rs)
Cost (Mil. Rs)

Total investment Mil. Rs. 1,425 2,529 3,769 9,263 8,445 3,017 786 29,235 100% Borrowing rate: 12%

2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
2036
2037
2038
2039
2040
2041
2042
2043
2044
2045
2046
2047
2048
(Million Rs.)
1000
-1000
-2000
-5000
Source: Study Team
AP-109
Public (PMRC) SPV
Initial
Financing sources
(Mil. Rs)
Cost (Mil. Rs)
Case P3a(v)-1 Land 32,546 PMC/PCMC/MIDC 5,501 16.9% E&M Case 3a(v)
Civil work VGF State government 6,761 20.8% Rolling Stock * 50% of initial investment subsidized by public
Track work VGF Central government 6,761 20.8% * 95% of fare box revenue is received as service fee

Total investment Mil. Rs. 1,425 2,529 4,212 10,192 9,603 3,398 1,187 32,546 100% Borrowing rate: 1.4%
Central Government Mil. Rs. 506 899 1,023 1,811 1,707 604 211 6,761 21%
State Government Mil. Rs. 506 899 1,023 1,811 1,707 604 211 6,761 21%

2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
2036
2037
2038
2039
2040
2041
2042
2043
2044
2045
2046
2047
2048
(Million Rs.)
2000
1000
0
-1000
-2000
-3000
-4000
-5000
-6000
Source: Study Team
Public (PMRC) SPV

Initial
Financing sources
(Mil. Rs)
Cost (Mil. Rs)

Total investment Mil. Rs. 1,425 2,529 4,212 10,192 9,603 3,398 1,187 32,546 100% Borrowing rate: 12%

2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
2036
2037
2038
2039
2040
2041
2042
2043
2044
2045
2046
2047
2048
(Million Rs.)
2000
1000
0
-1000
-2000
-3000
-4000
-5000
-6000
Source: Study Team
AP-110
Public (PMRC) SPV
Initial
Financing sources
(Mil. Rs)
Cost (Mil. Rs)
Case P1-1 Fullly public 57,693 Gov. Budget (PMC/PCMC/MIDC) 17,308 30%
undertaking Debt (JICA ODA loan) 40,385 70% - -
Initial investment cost and financing sources

Debt Mil. Rs. 0 0 2,988 14,553 15,332 6,163 1,349 40,385 70% Loan (grace) period: 30 (10) years
Central Government Mil. Rs. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
State Government Mil. Rs. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0% Equity IRR
PMC/PCMC/MIDC Mil. Rs. 1,425 2,529 2,420 4,255 4,483 1,802 394 17,308 30% 6.0%

2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
2036
2037
2038
2039
2040
2041
2042
2043
2044
2045
2046
2047
2048
(Million Rs.)
10000
8000 Debt service (interest + repayment)
6000
Government investment
4000
2000
0
-2000
-4000
-6000
-8000
Source: Study Team
Public (PMRC) SPV

Initial
Financing sources
(Mil. Rs)
Cost (Mil. Rs)
undertaking Debt (Commercial loan) 40,385 70% - -

Debt Mil. Rs. 0 0 2,988 14,553 15,332 6,163 1,349 40,385 70% Loan (grace) period: 17 (5) years
Central Government Mil. Rs. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
State Government Mil. Rs. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0% Equity IRR
PMC/PCMC/MIDC Mil. Rs. 1,425 2,529 2,420 4,255 4,483 1,802 394 17,308 30% 1.4%

2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
2036
2037
2038
2039
2040
2041
2042
2043
2044
2045
2046
2047
2048
(Million Rs.)
10000
8000
6000
4000
2000
0
-2000
-4000
-6000
-10000 Government investment
-12000
-16000
-18000
Source: Study Team
AP-111
Public (PMRC) SPV
Initial
Financing sources
(Mil. Rs)
Cost (Mil. Rs)
undertaking Gov. Budget (State government) 11,539 20%
Gov. Budget (Central government) 11,539 20% - -
Debt (JICA ODA loan) 28,847 50%

Debt Mil. Rs. 0 0 2,134 10,395 10,952 4,402 964 28,847 50% Loan (grace) period: 30 (10) years
Central Government Mil. Rs. 570 1,012 1,310 3,365 3,545 1,425 312 11,539 20%
State Government Mil. Rs. 570 1,012 1,310 3,365 3,545 1,425 312 11,539 20% Equity IRR
PMC/PCMC/MIDC Mil. Rs. 285 506 655 1,683 1,773 713 156 5,769 10% 5.1%

2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
2036
2037
2038
2039
2040
2041
2042
2043
2044
2045
2046
2047
2048
(Million Rs.)
10000
8000 Debt service (interest + repayment)
6000 Government investment
4000 Net cash flow for equity IRR
2000
0
-2000
-4000
-6000
-8000
-10000
Source: Study Team
Public (PMRC) SPV

Initial
Financing sources
(Mil. Rs)
Cost (Mil. Rs)
undertaking Gov. Budget (State government) 11,539 20%
Gov. Budget (Central government) 11,539 20% - -
Debt (Commercial loan) 28,847 50%

Debt Mil. Rs. 0 0 2,134 10,395 10,952 4,402 964 28,847 50% Loan (grace) period: 17 (5) years
Central Government Mil. Rs. 570 1,012 1,310 3,365 3,545 1,425 312 11,539 20%
State Government Mil. Rs. 570 1,012 1,310 3,365 3,545 1,425 312 11,539 20% Equity IRR
PMC/PCMC/MIDC Mil. Rs. 285 506 655 1,683 1,773 713 156 5,769 10% 2.2%

2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
2036
2037
2038
2039
2040
2041
2042
2043
2044
2045
2046
2047
2048
(Million Rs.)
10000
8000
6000
4000
2000
0
-2000
-4000
-6000
-10000 Government investment
-12000
-16000
S
ource: Study Team
AP-112
Appendix-27-5: Calculation Table of Public Cost Sharing Rate to Total Initial Investment
5-A. Base Scenario 1: Case 2a(iii)+ Case P2a(iii)
COST SHARING & FUNDING -Public/Private (VGF: 30% )*

Investment Amount Share Funding Share Share of
INR m % within INR m total
Initial Investment Total 57,693 100.0% Initial Investment Total 57,693 100.0%
Land Public 5,501 9.5% Public 100.0% 29,235 50.7%

Civil Public 23,734 41.1% VGF Central Govt 12.2% 3,560 6.2%
Track Private 3,312 5.7% VGF State Govt 12.2% 3,560 6.2%
E&M Private 9,011 15.6% PMC/PCMC/MIDC sub 18.8% 5,501 9.5%
Rolling Stock Private 16,136 28.0% PMRC Borrowing 56.8% 16,614 28.8%
Private 100.0% 28,459 49.3%

VGF Allocation Equity (30%) 21.0% 5,976 10.4%
Fundnig Req Allocated Debt (70%) 49.0% 13,945 24.2%
Total VGF 57,693 15,658 27.1% VGF 30.0% 8,538 14.8%
Public 29,235 7,120 24.4% Overall Funding

Private 28,459 8,538 30.0% VGF 15,658 27.1%
Public 22,114 38.3%
* Land cost is excluded from VGF calculation. Private 19,921 34.5%
Total 57,693 100.0%
VGF+Public: 65.5%
Source: Study Team
5-B. Base Scenario 2: Case 2a(v)+ Case P2a(v)


Track Private 3,312 5.7% VGF State Govt 20.3% 5,933 10.3%
Private 100.0% 28,459 49.3%

Total VGF 57,693 26,096 45.2% VGF 50.0% 14,229 24.7%

Private 28,459 14,229 50.0% VGF 26,096 45.2%
Public 17,368 30.1%
Total 57,693 100.0%
VGF+Public: 75.3%
Source: Study Team
AP-113
5-C. Base Scenario 3: Case 3a(v)+ Case P3a(v)


Track Public 3,312 5.7% VGF State Govt 20.8% 6,761 11.7%
Private 100.0% 25,147 43.6%

Total VGF 57,693 26,096 45.2% VGF 50.0% 12,574 21.8%

Private 25,147 12,574 50.0% VGF 26,096 45.2%
Public 19,023 33.0%
Total 57,693 100.0%
VGF+Public: 78.2%
Source: Study Team
AP-114
Appendix-27-6: Result of Financial and Economic Analysis in Case of Entirely Elevated
Alignment
6-A. Project Cost
Without Price Escalation and Exchange Rate Fluctuations
Total Cost (Unit: Million Rs.)

2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2023 2028 2033 Total Initial
(1) Construction/Procurement Investment
Civil Works 0 0 1,665 6,659 6,473 1,998 946 0 0 0 17,740 17,740
Track 0 0 282 564 669 209 209 0 0 0 1,933 1,933
E&M 0 0 743 1,485 2,037 552 276 0 0 0 5,093 5,093
Rolling Stock 0 0 0 3,285 3,285 1,643 0 2,746 845 704 12,508 8,213
Sub total 0 0 2,689 11,993 12,464 4,401 1,431 2,746 845 704 37,273 32,979
(2) Others 0
Land acquisition, Utility relocation 1,112 1,894 1,112 0 0 0 0 4,118 4,118
Consulting service 0 0 134 600 623 220 72 1,649 1,649
Contingency 0 0 141 630 654 231 75 137 42 35 1,946 1,731
Sub total 1,112 1,894 1,388 1,229 1,278 451 147 137 42 35 7,713 7,499
(3) Tax 0
Tax & Duty 200 341 708 2,267 2,356 832 270 494 152 127 7,747 6,974
Total 1,312 2,235 4,785 15,489 16,097 5,684 1,848 3,377 1,039 866 52,734 47,452
Foreign Currency Portion

2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2023 2028 2033 Total
(1) Construction/Procurement
Civil Works 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Track 0 0 66 132 157 49 49 0 0 0 453
E&M 0 0 330 660 905 245 123 0 0 0 2,262
Rolling Stock 0 0 0 3,285 3,285 1,643 0 2,746 845 704 12,508
Sub total 0 0 396 4,077 4,347 1,937 172 2,746 845 704 15,223
(2) Others
Land acquisition, Utility relocation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Consulting service 0 0 20 204 217 97 9 546
Contingency 0 0 21 214 228 102 9 137 42 35 788
Sub total 0 0 41 418 446 199 18 137 42 35 1,335
(3) Tax
Tax & Duty 0 0 75 771 822 366 32 494 152 127 2,838
Total 0 0 511 5,266 5,614 2,501 222 3,377 1,039 866 19,396
Local Currency Portion

2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2023 2028 2033 Total
Civil Works 0 0 1,665 6,659 6,473 1,998 946 0 0 0 17,740
Track 0 0 216 432 512 160 160 0 0 0 1,480
E&M 0 0 413 826 1,132 307 153 0 0 0 2,831
Rolling Stock 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sub total 2,293 7,916 8,117 2,465 1,259 0 0 0 22,051
(2) Others
Land acquisition, Utility relocation 1,112 1,894 1,112 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,118
Consulting service 0 0 115 396 406 123 63 1,103
Contingency 0 0 120 416 426 129 66 0 0 0 1,158
Sub total 1,112 1,894 1,347 811 832 253 129 0 0 0 6,379
(3) Tax
Tax & Duty 200 341 634 1,496 1,534 466 238 0 0 0 4,909
Total 1,312 2,235 4,274 10,224 10,483 3,183 1,627 0 0 0 33,338
Source: Study Team
AP-115
With Price Escalation and Exchange Rate Fluctuations
Total Cost (Unit: Million Rs.)

2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2023 2028 2033 Total Initial
(1) Construction/Procurement Investment
Civil Works 0 0 1,962 8,180 8,285 2,664 1,314 0 0 0 22,406 22,406
Track 0 0 343 720 897 295 310 0 0 0 2,564 2,564
E&M 0 0 927 1,960 2,844 815 431 0 0 0 6,977 6,977
Rolling Stock 0 0 0 4,711 5,063 2,721 0 5,202 1,776 1,642 21,113 12,494
Sub total 0 0 3,232 15,570 17,088 6,495 2,056 5,202 1,776 1,642 53,060 44,441
(2) Others 0
Land acquisition, Utility relocation 1,207 2,143 1,311 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,662 4,662
Consulting service 0 0 162 779 854 325 103 0 0 0 2,222 2,222
Contingency 0 0 170 817 897 341 108 260 89 82 2,764 2,333
Sub total 1,207 2,143 1,642 1,596 1,752 666 211 260 89 82 9,648 9,217
(3) Tax 0
Tax & Duty 217 386 847 2,943 3,230 1,228 389 936 320 296 10,790 9,238
Total 1,425 2,529 5,721 20,109 22,069 8,388 2,655 6,398 2,184 2,019 73,498 62,897
Foreign Currency Portion

2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2023 2028 2033 Total
Civil Works 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Track 0 0 88 189 241 81 87 0 0 0 688
E&M 0 0 440 946 1,394 406 218 0 0 0 3,405
Rolling Stock 0 0 0 4,711 5,063 2,721 0 5,202 1,776 1,642 21,113
Sub total 0 0 528 5,846 6,699 3,208 305 5,202 1,776 1,642 25,206
(2) Others
Consulting service 0 0 26 292 335 160 15 0 0 0 829
Contingency 0 0 28 307 352 168 16 260 89 82 1,302
Sub total 0 0 54 599 687 329 31 260 89 82 2,131
(3) Tax
Tax & Duty 0 0 100 1,105 1,266 606 58 936 320 296 4,686
Total 0 0 682 7,550 8,651 4,143 395 6,398 2,184 2,019 32,023
Local Currency Portion

2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2023 2028 2033 Total
Civil Works 0 0 1,962 8,180 8,285 2,664 1,314 0 0 0 22,406
Track 0 0 254 530 655 214 223 0 0 0 1,877
E&M 0 0 487 1,014 1,449 409 213 0 0 0 3,572
Rolling Stock 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sub total 0 0 2,704 9,724 10,389 3,287 1,750 0 0 0 27,855
(2) Others
Consulting service 0 0 135 486 519 164 88 0 0 0 1,393
Contingency 0 0 142 511 545 173 92 0 0 0 1,462
Sub total 1,207 2,143 1,588 997 1,065 337 179 0 0 0 7,517
(3) Tax
Tax & Duty 217 386 747 1,838 1,964 621 331 0 0 0 6,104
Total 1,425 2,529 5,039 12,559 13,418 4,245 2,261 0 0 0 41,475
Source: Study Team
6-B. Financial and Economic Internal Rate of Return
Project FIRR Economic IRR

4.8% 13.3%
Source: Study Team
AP-116
6-C. Financial Cash Flow Graphs of PMRC (3 Base Cases)
Public (PMRC) SPV

Initial
Investment Financing sources
Case Undertaking Undertaking Case
Cost (Mil. (Mil. Rs)
Rs)

Debt Mil. Rs. 0 0 1,714 7,145 7,237 2,327 1,148 19,571 57% Loan (grace) period: 30(10) years
PMC/PCMC/MIDC Mil. Rs. 621 1,102 1,032 1,490 1,509 485 239 6,480 19%

2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
2036
2037
2038
2039
2040
2041
2042
2043
2044
2045
2046
2047
2048
(Million Rs.)
1000
500
0
-500
-1000
-1500
-3000
-3500
-4000
Source: Study Team
Public (PMRC) SPV

Initial
Rs)


2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
2036
2037
2038
2039
2040
2041
2042
2043
2044
2045
2046
2047
2048
(Million Rs.)
2000
1000
0
-1000
-2000
-3000
-4000
-5000
-6000
Source: Study Team
AP-117
Public (PMRC) SPV
Initial
Rs)

Debt Mil. Rs. 0 0 1,448 5,590 5,767 1,859 1,021 15,685 42% Loan (grace) period: 30(10) years

2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
2036
2037
2038
2039
2040
2041
2042
2043
2044
2045
2046
2047
2048
(Million Rs.)
2000
1000
0
-1000
-2000
-5000
-6000
-7000
Source: Study Team
AP-118
MIDC PCMC PMC
(7.8km) (7.3km) (6.5km)
St. 19
(17KM600) St. 18
(16KM900) St. 17
(15KM450) St. 15 St. 13
St. 20 (12KM800) (10KM600)
(18KM700)
St. 16
Depot
(14KM700) St. 14
(11KM490) St. 12
(8KM655)
Land Acquistion for Depot
St. 11
St. 21
NH-4 (7KM650)
(21KM600)
St. 10
(6KM350)
Mula River
St. 9
(5KM550)
St. 8
APPENDIX-28-1: Whole Elevated for LRT
(5KM000)
APPENDIX-28: Whole Elevated for LRT
St. 7
(4KM250)
St. 6
AP-119
(3KM720)
St. 5
Proposed depot location Raising of High Voltage Power (2KM300)
Wire Proposed St. 3 (Police
St. 4
(1KM800)
Ground) location
Legend
St. 2
: Station (0KM590)
: Elevated Structure (Viaduct) St. 3
(1KM000)
: At-grade Structure St. 1
: Depot Tree cutting for at-grade (0KM250)
section
MIDC PCMC PMC
all
all
ple
ffice
ffice
ent Colony
DO
pleNilakh
Phase3
ipoCircle
E-Square
am
ahindaraTech
JMTem
W
PW
Octroi Naka
akadChowk1
akadChowk2
Sivaji Nagar
ShoppingM
PuneCentral
akadRoadM
Hinjawadi Road
Pim
AundhDistrict
StateHospital
Shivaji Chowk
PoliceGround
M
TATAJohnson
PuneUniversity
St.9
St.8
St.7 Arm
St.5
St.4
St.6
St.3
St.2
St.1
St.21
St.20 InfosysCirclePhase2
St.16
St.15 W
St.14 W
St.19
St.18
St.17
St.13 W
St.12
St.11
St.10
RL = 11.5 - 13.5 m
Depot NH-4
Mula River
APPENDIX-28-2 (1): Allocation of Investment Cost (at 2012 prices)
without price escalation or exchange rate changes
【外貨・内貨合計】 (Unit: Million Rs.)

2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2023 2028 2033 Total
(1)建設・調達費用
Civil Works 0 0 1,460 5,839 5,109 1,752 438 0 0 0 14,597
Track 0 0 282 564 669 209 209 0 0 0 1,933
E&M 0 0 743 1,485 2,037 552 276 0 0 0 5,093
Rolling Stock 0 0 0 3,285 3,285 1,643 0 2,746 845 704 12,508
小計 0 0 2,484 11,173 11,100 4,155 923 2,746 845 704 34,131
(2)その他
Land acquisition, Utility relocation 1,112 1,894 1,112 0 0 0 0 4,118
Contingency 0 0 130 587 583 218 48 137 42 35 1,781
小計 1,112 1,894 1,367 1,145 1,138 426 95 137 42 35 7,391
(3)税金
Tax & Duty 200 341 670 2,112 2,098 785 174 494 152 127 7,153
合計 1,312 2,235 4,521 14,430 14,336 5,367 1,192 3,377 1,039 866 48,675
【外貨】
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2023 2028 2033 Total
Civil Works 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Track 0 0 66 132 157 49 49 0 0 0 453
E&M 0 0 330 660 905 245 123 0 0 0 2,262
Rolling Stock 0 0 0 3,285 3,285 1,643 0 2,746 845 704 12,508
小計 0 0 396 4,077 4,347 1,937 172 2,746 845 704 15,223
(2)その他
Contingency 0 0 21 214 228 102 9 137 42 35 788
小計 0 0 41 418 446 199 18 137 42 35 1,335
(3)税金
Tax & Duty 0 0 75 771 822 366 32 494 152 127 2,838
合計 0 0 511 5,266 5,614 2,501 222 3,377 1,039 866 19,396
【内貨】
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2023 2028 2033 Total
Civil Works 0 0 1,460 5,839 5,109 1,752 438 0 0 0 14,597
Track 0 0 216 432 512 160 160 0 0 0 1,480
E&M 0 0 413 826 1,132 307 153 0 0 0 2,831
Rolling Stock 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
小計 2,088 7,096 6,753 2,219 752 0 0 0 18,908
(2)その他
Contingency 0 0 110 373 355 116 39 0 0 0 993
小計 1,112 1,894 1,326 727 692 227 77 0 0 0 6,056
(3)税金
Tax & Duty 200 341 595 1,341 1,276 419 142 0 0 0 4,315
合計 1,312 2,235 4,009 9,165 8,722 2,865 971 0 0 0 29,279
At grade＋Elevated for LRT

Total 48 ,675 Million Rs.
AP-120
APPENDIX-28-2 (2): The case of Whole Elevated for LRT
without price escalation or exchange rate changes
【外貨・内貨合計】 (Unit: Million Rs.)

2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2023 2028 2033 Total 初期投資
(1)建設・調達費用のみTotal
Civil Works 0 0 1,665 6,659 6,473 1,998 946 0 0 0 17,740 17,740
Track 0 0 282 564 669 209 209 0 0 0 1,933 1,933
E&M 0 0 743 1,485 2,037 552 276 0 0 0 5,093 5,093
Rolling Stock 0 0 0 3,285 3,285 1,643 0 2,746 845 704 12,508 8,213
小計 0 0 2,689 11,993 12,464 4,401 1,431 2,746 845 704 37,273 32,979
(2)その他 0
Land acquisition, Utility relocation 1,112 1,894 1,112 0 0 0 0 4,118 4,118
Consulting service 0 0 134 600 623 220 72 1,649 1,649
Contingency 0 0 141 630 654 231 75 137 42 35 1,946 1,731
小計 1,112 1,894 1,388 1,229 1,278 451 147 137 42 35 7,713 7,499
(3)税金 0
Tax & Duty 200 341 708 2,267 2,356 832 270 494 152 127 7,747 6,974
合計 1,312 2,235 4,785 15,489 16,097 5,684 1,848 3,377 1,039 866 52,734 47,452
【外貨】
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2023 2028 2033 Total
Civil Works 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Track 0 0 66 132 157 49 49 0 0 0 453
E&M 0 0 330 660 905 245 123 0 0 0 2,262
Rolling Stock 0 0 0 3,285 3,285 1,643 0 2,746 845 704 12,508
小計 0 0 396 4,077 4,347 1,937 172 2,746 845 704 15,223
(2)その他
Contingency 0 0 21 214 228 102 9 137 42 35 788
小計 0 0 41 418 446 199 18 137 42 35 1,335
(3)税金
Tax & Duty 0 0 75 771 822 366 32 494 152 127 2,838
合計 0 0 511 5,266 5,614 2,501 222 3,377 1,039 866 19,396
【内貨】
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2023 2028 2033 Total
Civil Works 0 0 1,665 6,659 6,473 1,998 946 0 0 0 17,740
Track 0 0 216 432 512 160 160 0 0 0 1,480
E&M 0 0 413 826 1,132 307 153 0 0 0 2,831
Rolling Stock 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
小計 2,293 7,916 8,117 2,465 1,259 0 0 0 22,051
(2)その他
Contingency 0 0 120 416 426 129 66 0 0 0 1,158
小計 1,112 1,894 1,347 811 832 253 129 0 0 0 6,379
(3)税金
Tax & Duty 200 341 634 1,496 1,534 466 238 0 0 0 4,909
合計 1,312 2,235 4,274 10,224 10,483 3,183 1,627 0 0 0 33,338
Whole Elevated for LRT

Total 52,734 Million Rs.
AP-121
APPENDIX-28-3: Table of comparison of the advantages and disadvantages between a partial at-grade system and
an entirely elevated system
Items Partial At-Grade Entirely Elevated
1 Making use of Since an LRT can run at-grade at a lower level, the LRT can The elevated station forces Passengers to travel a long
Characteristics of reduce the inconvenience to passengers through easy boarding distance from the ground level to the platform and does not
the LRT and easy transit to other transportation modes. make use of the compact characteristics of LRT due to the
Additionally, the at-grade station can be built on a small scale. elevated structure.
2 Number of 5 stations (3 stations in PMC area and 2 stations in PCMC Nil
at-grade stations area)
3 Elevated stations 16 stations (7 stations in PMC area, 3 stations in PCMC area 21 stations (10 stations in PMC area, 5 stations in PCMC area
and 6 stations in MIDC area) and 6 stations in MIDC area)
4 Access to platform Easy access from road level to platform in at-grade section. Elevated station requires a large concourse under the platform.
AP-122
5 Operation speed Operation speed is restricted due to steep gradient. Not restricted for operation speed.
6 Evacuation of Easy evacuation of passengers because of at-grade station. The evacuation of passengers takes into consideration of the
passengers in height due to the elevated structure.
emergency
7 Influence to road Level crossings need to be provided in the at-grade sections in No consideration for operation because it is entirely elevated
traffic the future.
8 Railway system Railway system needs to be coordinated with the road signals No consideration for road traffic.
in the at-grade sections.
9 Project cost The public portion of the project cost can be reduced The public portion of the project cost is increased due to the
under a PPP scheme. The railway system is the same. entirely elevated system. The railway system is the same.
Total is 48,675Million Rs. Total is 52,734 Million Rs.
APPENDIX-29: Measures for Increase of Demand
1. Trains
Passenger demand is forecasted until the year 2038. PPHPD of the year 2038 will be 15,102 and in
the Train Operation Plan operation head way at peak hour is 2.5 minute. Assuming that capacity of
one train is 690 passengers, transportation capacity of peak hour is 16,560 passengers. Ratio of
demand to transportation capacity is 91.2%.
When demand increases more, train will be extended longer to increase the capacity, because
shortening the headway might block the road traffic.
Trains consist of 30m unit + 30m unit totally 60m long at the opening. One body unit will be inserted
and length of one train will be 70m after enhancement.
60m
30m 30m
70m
30m 40m
Figure A29-1 60m train and 70m train
Capacity of one train becomes 805 passengers after enhancement and transportation capacity of one
hour with 2.5 minute headway becomes 19,320 passengers. It will be capable to transport until the
year 2048 when the demand increase proportionally.
2. Structures
Stations will be constructed for 60m train at first and it will be extended when 70m trains are
introduced.
As for depot and workshop, tracks will be constructed for 70m trains from the first time because it is
difficult to extending the track and facilities.
AP-123
APPENDIX-30 FORM 1
FORM 1
(I) Basic Information
Name of the Project:
Location / site alternatives under consideration:
Size of the Project: *
Expected cost of the project:
Contact Information:
Screening Category:
• Capacity corresponding to sectoral activity (such as production

capacity for manufacturing, mining lease area and production capacity
for mineral production, area for mineral exploration, length for linear
transport infrastructure, generation capacity for power generation
etc.,)
(II) Activity
1. Construction, operation or decommissioning of the Project involving

actions, which will cause physical changes in the locality (topography, land
use, changes in water bodies, etc.)
Details thereof (with

approximate quantities /rates,
S.No. Information/Checklist confirmation Yes/No wherever possible) with source
of information data
1.1 Permanent or temporary change in land use,
land cover or topography including increase
in intensity of land use (with respect to
local land use plan)
1.2 Clearance of existing land, vegetation and
buildings?
1.3 Creation of new land uses?
1.4 Pre-construction investigations e.g. bore

houses, soil testing?
1.5 Construction works?
1.6 Demolition works?
1.7 Temporary sites used for construction works

or
housing of construction workers?
AP-124
1.8 Above ground buildings, structures or
earthworks including linear structures, cut
and
fill or excavations
1.9 Underground works including mining or
tunneling?
1.10 Reclamation works?
1.11 Dredging?
1.12 Offshore structures?
1.13 Production and manufacturing processes?
1.14 Facilities for storage of goods or materials?
1.15 Facilities for treatment or disposal of solid

waste or liquid effluents?
1.16 Facilities for long term housing of
operational workers?
1.17 New road, rail or sea traffic during
construction or operation?
1.18 New road, rail, air waterborne or other

transport infrastructure including new or
altered routes and stations, ports, airports etc?
1.19 Closure or diversion of existing transport

routes or infrastructure leading to changes in
traffic
movements?
1.20 New or diverted transmission lines or

pipelines?
1.21 Impoundment, damming, culverting,
realignment or other changes to the
hydrology of watercourses or aquifers?
1.22 Stream crossings?
1.23 Abstraction or transfers of water form ground

or surface waters?
1.24 Changes in water bodies or the land surface
affecting drainage or run-off?
1.25 Transport of personnel or materials for
construction, operation or decommissioning?
1.26 Long-term dismantling or decommissioning
or restoration works?
1.27 Ongoing activity during decommissioning
which could have an impact on the
environment?
AP-125
1.28 Influx of people to an area in either
temporarily or permanently?
1.29 Introduction of alien species?
1.30 Loss of native species or genetic diversity?
1.31 Any other actions?
2. Use of Natural resources for construction or operation of the Project (such as

land, water, materials or energy, especially any resources which are non-
renewable or in short supply):

approximate quantities /rates,
S.No. Information/checklist confirmation Yes/No wherever possible) with source
of information data
2.1 Land especially undeveloped or agricultural
land (ha)
2.2 Water (expected source & competing users)

unit: KLD
2.3 Minerals (MT)
2.4 Construction material – stone, aggregates,

sand / soil (expected source – MT)
2.5 Forests and timber (source – MT)
2.6 Energy including electricity and fuels
(source, competing users) Unit: fuel (MT),
energy (MW)
2.7 Any other natural resources (use appropriate
standard units)
AP-126
3. Use, storage, transport, handling or production of substances or
materials, which could be harmful to human health or the
environment or raise concerns about actual or perceived risks to
human health.

approximate
S.No. Information/Checklist confirmation Yes/No quantities/rates, wherever
possible) with source of
information data
3.1 Use of substances or materials, which are
hazardous (as per MSIHC rules) to human health or
the environment (flora, fauna, and
water supplies)
3.2 Changes in occurrence of disease or affect disease
vectors (e.g. insect or water borne diseases)
3.3 Affect the welfare of people e.g. by changing living

conditions?
3.4 Vulnerable groups of people who could be affected

by the project e.g. hospital patients, children, the
elderly etc.,
3.5 Any other causes
4. Production of solid wastes during construction or operation or

decommissioning (MT/month)

approximate
information data
4.1 Spoil, overburden or mine wastes
4.2 Municipal waste (domestic and or commercial

wastes)
4.3 Hazardous wastes (as per Hazardous Waste

Management Rules)
AP-127
4.4 Other industrial process wastes
4.5 Surplus product
4.6 Sewage sludge or other sludge from effluent

treatment
4.7 Construction or demolition wastes
4.8 Redundant machinery or equipment
4.9 Contaminated soils or other materials
4.10 Agricultural wastes
4.11 Other solid wastes
5. Release of pollutants or any hazardous, toxic or noxious substances to

air (Kg/hr)

approximate
information data
5.1 Emissions from combustion of fossil fuels from
stationary or mobile sources
5.2 Emissions from production processes

5.3 Emissions from materials handling including
storage or transport
5.4 Emissions from construction activities including
plant and equipment
5.5 Dust or odours from handling of materials
including construction materials, sewage and
waste
5.6 Emissions from incineration of waste
AP-128
5.7 Emissions from burning of waste in open air (e.g.
slash materials, construction debris)
5.8 Emissions from any other sources
6. Generation of Noise and Vibration, and Emissions of Light and Heat:
Yes/No Details thereof (with

approximate
quantities/rates, wherever
S.No. Information/Checklist confirmation possible) with source of
information data with
source of information
data
6.1 From operation of equipment e.g. engines,
ventilation plant, crushers
6.2 From industrial or similar processes
6.3 From construction or demolition
6.4 From blasting or piling
6.5 From construction or operational traffic
6.6 From lighting or cooling systems
6.7 From any other sources
AP-129
7. Risks of contamination of land or water from releases of pollutants into the
ground or into sewers, surface waters, groundwater, coastal waters or the sea:

approximate
information data
7.1 From handling, storage, use or spillage of
hazardous materials
7.2 From discharge of sewage or other effluents to

water or the land (expected mode and place of
discharge)
7.3 By deposition of pollutants emitted to air into the

land or into water
7.4 From any other sources
7.5 Is there a risk of long term build up of pollutants in

the environment from these sources?
8. Risk of accidents during construction or operation of the Project, which

could affect human health or the environment

approximate
information data
8.1 From explosions, spillages, fires etc from storage,

handling, use or production of hazardous
substances
8.2 From any other causes
8.3 Could the project be affected by natural disasters

causing environmental damage (e.g. floods,
earthquakes, landslides, cloudburst etc)?
AP-130
9. Factors which should be considered (such as consequential development)
which could lead to environmental effects or the potential for cumulative
impacts with other existing or planned activities in the locality

approximate
S. No. Information/Checklist confirmation Yes/No quantities/rates, wherever
information data
9.1 Lead to development of supporting.
lities, ancillary development or development
stimulated by the project which could have
impact on the environment e.g.:
• Supporting infrastructure (roads, power supply,

waste or waste water treatment, etc.)
• housing development
• extractive industries
• supply industries
• other
9.2 Lead to after-use of the site, which could havean

impact on the environment
9.3 Set a precedent for later developments
9.4 Have cumulative effects due to proximity to other

existing or planned projects with similar effects
(III) Environmental Sensitivity
Aerial distance (within 15

S.No. Areas Name/ km.)
Identity Proposed project location
boundary
1 Areas protected under international conventions,

national or local legislation for their ecological,
landscape, cultural or other related value
2 Areas which are important or sensitive for
ecological reasons - Wetlands, watercourses or
AP-131
other water bodies, coastal zone, biospheres,
mountains, forests
3 Areas used by protected, important or sensitive
species of flora or fauna for breeding, nesting,
foraging, resting, over wintering, migration
4 Inland, coastal, marine or underground waters
5 State, National boundaries
6 Routes or facilities used by the public for access

to recreation or other tourist, pilgrim areas
7 Defence installations
8 Densely populated or built-up area
9 Areas occupied by sensitive man-made land uses

(hospitals, schools, places of worship, community
facilities)
10 Areas containing important, high quality or scarce

resources
(ground water resources, surface resources,
forestry, agriculture, fisheries, tourism, minerals)
11 Areas already subjected to pollution or

environmental damage. (those where existing legal
environmental standards are exceeded)
12 Areas susceptible to natural hazard which could
cause the project to present environmental
problems
(earthquakes, subsidence, landslides, erosion,
flooding
or extreme or adverse climatic conditions)
(IV). Proposed Terms of Reference for EIA studies
AP-132
APPENDIX-31 FORM 1A
APPENDIX II
FORM-1 A (only for construction projects listed under item 8 of the Schedule)
CHECK LIST OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
(Project proponents are required to provide full information and wherever
necessary attach explanatory notes with the Form and submit along with
proposed environmental management plan & monitoring programme)
1. LAND ENVIRONMENT
(Attach panoramic view of the project site and the vicinity)
1.1. Will the existing landuse get significantly altered from the project that is not
consistent with the surroundings? (Proposed landuse must conform to the approved
Master Plan / Development Plan of the area. Change of landuse if any and the
statutory approval from the competent authority be submitted). Attach Maps of (i) site
location, (ii) surrounding features of the proposed site (within 500 meters) and (iii)the
site (indicating levels & contours) to appropriate scales. If not available attach only
conceptual plans.
1.2. List out all the major project requirements in terms of the land area, built up area,
water consumption, power requirement, connectivity, community facilities, parking
needs etc.
1.3. What are the likely impacts of the proposed activity on the existing facilities
adjacent to the proposed site? (Such as open spaces, community facilities, details of
the existing landuse, disturbance to the local ecology).
1.4. Will there be any significant land disturbance resulting in erosion, subsidence &
instability? (Details of soil type, slope analysis, vulnerability to subsidence, seismicity
etc may be given).
1.5. Will the proposal involve alteration of natural drainage systems? (Give details on
a contour map showing the natural drainage near the proposed project site)
1.6. What are the quantities of earthwork involved in the construction activity-cutting,
filling, reclamation etc. (Give details of the quantities of earthwork involved, transport
of fill materials from outside the site etc.)
1.7. Give details regarding water supply, waste handling etc during the construction
period.
1.8. Will the low lying areas & wetlands get altered? (Provide details of how low lying
and wetlands are getting modified from the proposed activity)
1.9. Whether construction debris & waste during construction cause health hazard?
(Give quantities of various types of wastes generated during construction including the
construction labour and the means of disposal)
AP-133
2. WATER ENVIRONMENT
2.1. Give the total quantity of water requirement for the proposed project with the
breakup of requirements for various uses. How will the water requirement met? State
the sources & quantities and furnish a water balance statement.
2.2. What is the capacity (dependable flow or yield) of the proposed source of water?
2.3. What is the quality of water required, in case, the supply is not from a municipal
source? (Provide physical, chemical, biological characteristics with class of water
quality)
2.4. How much of the water requirement can be met from the recycling of treated
wastewater? (Give the details of quantities, sources and usage)
2.5. Will there be diversion of water from other users? (Please assess the impacts of
the project on other existing uses and quantities of consumption)
2.6. What is the incremental pollution load from wastewater generated from the
proposed activity? (Give details of the quantities and composition of wastewater
generated from the proposed activity)
2.7. Give details of the water requirements met from water harvesting? Furnish details
of the facilities created.
2.8. What would be the impact of the land use changes occurring due to the proposed
project on the runoff characteristics (quantitative as well as qualitative) of the area in
the post construction phase on a long term basis? Would it aggravate the problems of
flooding or water logging in any way?
2.9. What are the impacts of the proposal on the ground water? (Will there be tapping
of ground water; give the details of ground water table, recharging capacity, and
approvals obtained from competent authority, if any)
2.10. What precautions/measures are taken to prevent the run-off from construction
activities polluting land & aquifers? (Give details of quantities and the measures taken
to avoid the adverse impacts)
2.11. How is the storm water from within the site managed?(State the provisions made
to avoid flooding of the area, details of the drainage facilities provided along with a site
layout indication contour levels)
2.12. Will the deployment of construction labourers particularly in the peak period lead
to unsanitary conditions around the project site (Justify with proper explanation)
2.13. What on-site facilities are provided for the collection, treatment & safe disposal of
sewage? (Give details of the quantities of wastewater generation, treatment capacities
with technology & facilities for recycling and disposal)
AP-134
2.14. Give details of dual plumbing system if treated waste used is used for flushing of
toilets or any other use.
3. VEGETATION
3.1. Is there any threat of the project to the biodiversity? (Give a description of the
local ecosystem with it’s unique features, if any)
3.2. Will the construction involve extensive clearing or modification of vegetation?
(Provide a detailed account of the trees & vegetation affected by the project)
3.3. What are the measures proposed to be taken to minimize the likely impacts on
important site features (Give details of proposal for tree plantation, landscaping, creation
of water bodies etc along with a layout plan to an appropriate scale)
4. FAUNA
4.1. Is there likely to be any displacement of fauna- both terrestrial and aquatic or
creation of barriers for their movement? Provide the details.
4.2. Any direct or indirect impacts on the avifauna of the area? Provide details.
4.3. Prescribe measures such as corridors, fish ladders etc to mitigate adverse impacts on
fauna
5. AIR ENVIRONMENT
5.1. Will the project increase atmospheric concentration of gases & result in heat
islands? (Give details of background air quality levels with predicted values based on
dispersion models taking into account the increased traffic generation as a result of the
proposed constructions)
5.2. What are the impacts on generation of dust, smoke, odorous fumes or other
hazardous gases? Give details in relation to all the meteorological parameters.
5.3. Will the proposal create shortage of parking space for vehicles? Furnish details of
the present level of transport infrastructure and measures proposed for improvement
including the traffic management at the entry & exit to the project site.
5.4. Provide details of the movement patterns with internal roads, bicycle tracks,
pedestrian pathways, footpaths etc., with areas under each category.
5.5. Will there be significant increase in traffic noise & vibrations? Give details of the
sources and the measures proposed for mitigation of the above.
5.6. What will be the impact of DG sets & other equipment on noise levels & vibration
in & ambient air quality around the project site? Provide details.
6. AESTHETICS
6.1. Will the proposed constructions in any way result in the obstruction of a view,
scenic amenity or landscapes? Are these considerations taken into account by the
proponents?
6.2. Will there be any adverse impacts from new constructions on the existing
structures? What are the considerations taken into account?
6.3. Whether there are any local considerations of urban form & urban design
influencing the design criteria? They may be explicitly spelt out.
AP-135
6.4. Are there any anthropological or archaeological sites or artefacts nearby? State if
any other significant features in the vicinity of the proposed site have been considered.
7. SOCIO-ECONOMIC ASPECTS
7.1. Will the proposal result in any changes to the demographic structure of local
population? Provide the details.
7.2. Give details of the existing social infrastructure around the proposed project.
7.3. Will the project cause adverse effects on local communities, disturbance to sacred
sites or other cultural values? What are the safeguards proposed?
8. BUILDING MATERIALS
8.1. May involve the use of building materials with high-embodied energy. Are the
construction materials produced with energy efficient processes? (Give details of
energy conservation measures in the selection of building materials and their energy
efficiency)
8.2. Transport and handling of materials during construction may result in pollution,
noise & public nuisance. What measures are taken to minimize the impacts?
8.3. Are recycled materials used in roads and structures? State the extent of savings
achieved?
8.4. Give details of the methods of collection, segregation & disposal of the garbage
generated during the operation phases of the project.
9. ENERGY CONSERVATION
9.1. Give details of the power requirements, source of supply, backup source etc. What
is the energy consumption assumed per square foot of built-up area? How have you tried
to minimize energy consumption?
9.2. What type of, and capacity of, power back-up to you plan to provide?
9.3. What are the characteristics of the glass you plan to use? Provide specifications of
its characteristics related to both short wave and long wave radiation?
9.4. What passive solar architectural features are being used in the building? Illustrate
the applications made in the proposed project.
9.5. Does the layout of streets & buildings maximise the potential for solar energy
devices? Have you considered the use of street lighting, emergency lighting and solar
hot water systems for use in the building complex? Substantiate with details.
9.6. Is shading effectively used to reduce cooling/heating loads? What principles have
been used to maximize the shading of Walls on the East and the West and the Roof?
How much energy saving has been effected?
AP-136
9.7. Do the structures use energy-efficient space conditioning, lighting and mechanical
systems? Provide technical details. Provide details of the transformers and motor
efficiencies, lighting intensity and air-conditioning load assumptions? Are you using
CFC and HCFC free chillers? Provide specifications.
9.8. What are the likely effects of the building activity in altering the micro-climates?
Provide a self assessment on the likely impacts of the proposed construction on creation
of heat island & inversion effects?
9.9. What are the thermal characteristics of the building envelope? (a) roof; (b) external
walls; and (c) fenestration? Give details of the material used and the U-values or the R
values of the individual components.
9.10. What precautions & safety measures are proposed against fire hazards? Furnish
details of emergency plans.
9.11. If you are using glass as wall material provides details and specifications including
emissivity and thermal characteristics.
9.12. What is the rate of air infiltration into the building? Provide details of how you are
mitigating the effects of infiltration.
9.13. To what extent the non-conventional energy technologies are utilised in the overall
energy consumption? Provide details of the renewable energy technologies used.
10. Environment Management Plan
The Environment Management Plan would consist of all mitigation measures for each
item wise activity to be undertaken during the construction, operation and the entire life
cycle to minimize adverse environmental impacts as a result of the activities of the
project. It would also delineate the environmental monitoring plan for compliance of
various environmental regulations. It will state the steps to be taken in case of
emergency such as accidents at the site including fire.
AP-137
APPENDIX-32 Letter from Ultra-Tech to PURP
Date: 22.02.2013
To
PURP
CASABLANCA
1ST Floor,
Sangam Press Road
Opp. Karisma Soc. Kuthrud,
Pune 411038.
Sub: Initiating Metro link in Pune Metropolis

Ref: Our meeting on 22.02.2013 at Kuthrud, Pune 411038.
.
Dear Sir,
We had a meeting 22nd Feb, 2013 morning on the above subject in your office. This letter
is I furtherance to that.
We were impressed by the keen-ness of your team on this development in PMC-PCMC-
MIDC network. Though this was a preliminary meeting, you had given us adequate
information to proceed further.
The starting point in any new project or activity is to look into the EIA Notification
promulgated by Ministry of Environment and Forest (MoEF), New Delhi under Central
Government, first time in 1994 and amended many times subsequently. It narrates the
discipline of obtaining the Environmental Clearance (EC). The frame work steps are:
1. Screening
2. Scoping (getting ToR)
3. Writing draft EIA
4. Public Hearing/ Consultation
5. Writing Final EIA
6. Appraisal by EAC
7. Finally EC
The first step is screening. This aims at finding (1) whether our activity needs such EC
and (2) if yes whether it comes under purview of EAC of MoEF in New Delhi (labeled as
Category A) or is to be heard by State EAC (also appointed by MoEF, and called as
Category B). We find that,
• The Metro Link or railways, as such is not covered anywhere in Column No.2 of
the schedule.
• The activity of ‘Highway’ comes under 7 (f)
• The Aerial Ropeway comes in 7 (g)
AP-138
• Building Construction comes in 8 (a) and
• Area development projects falls in 8 (b)
• The terrain concerned is not hilly (Above 1000 m MSL).
It therefore means that, by screening we come under Category B, which means to
approach SEIAA/ SEAC in Mumbai. It is always better to obtain some EC so that our
activity remains safe from the eyes of Public, NGO’s & Environmentalists.
We therefore feel that, you should better approach SEAC under category 8 (a or b) so
that, you do not attract any public hearing. What will be needed is the immediate
preparation for fiiling Form 1 , 1 A and writing a conceptual Note / Prefeasibility Report.
If we do this, the further step of fixing the TOR or scoping will be officially done by
SEAC and we can voluntarily submit the scoping by ourselves also.
We are capable of doing this in short time as a starting point and thereafter the further
steps like,
• Finding the environmental setting

• Study on Biodiversity
• Corporate Social responsibility
• Obtaining NOC’s from Stake Holders, if any
• Judging the sensitive points from Environment, Heritage, Defense, Forest,
Airport, High Tension Lines and similar angles.
We are very often going before SEAC and hence are acquainted with their system of
analysis ad appraisal. Thus we can help you, hopefully, without trial and error. We shall
be more comfortable to work with you rather than any other local authority.
This is only a preliminary letter and more involved work we follow as per your
requirement.
Thanking You,
Regards
Mr. Kishor Sawant
Director
ULTRA- TECH
Environmental Consultancy & Laboratory
Lab. Gazetted by MoEF- Govt. of India.
S. No. 87, Office No. 7/8,
Bandal Prestige , Azad Nagar,
Opposite Siddhivinayak Temple,
Kothrud, Pune- 411 038
Ph. no. 020- 25380193, 25380194, 25380148
AP-139

4

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

4

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

4

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

PUNE SHIVAJINAGAR

Project : PREPARATORY SURVEY ON THE URBAN RAILWAY PROJECT IN PUNE

SAMPLE & INSITU

Depth below EGL

0 0.00 - 0.50 0.00 MADE GROUND (recovered as pieces of Basalt)

1.50 - 1.80 24 50 - >100 1.50 Very dense, blackish, SAND 5 93 2

Borehole Terminated at 5.10m below EGL

CHECKED BY : KKJ APPROVED BY : ST

SAMPLE & INSITU

Depth below EGL

5.50 - 6.00 5.50 Weak, highly weathered brownish BASALT 58 24 -

9 Borehole Terminated at 8.50m below EGL

CHECKED BY : KKJ APPROVED BY : ST

SAMPLE & INSITU

Depth below EGL

0 0.00 - 0.50 0.00 MADE GROUND (gravelly SAND) 7 23 41 29 40/13/-

Borehole Terminated at 4.20m below EGL

CHECKED BY : KKJ APPROVED BY : ST

SAMPLE & INSITU

Depth below EGL

1.50 - 1.95 11 19 25 44 9 43 41 7 60/25/-

CHECKED BY : KKJ APPROVED BY : ST

SAMPLE & INSITU

Depth below EGL

0 0.00 - 0.50 0.00 MADE GROUND (SANDY SILT) 7 36 54 3 37/8/-

1 0.80 - 1.10 Nill Nill Nill

Borehole Terminated at 4.10m below EGL

CHECKED BY : KKJ APPROVED BY : ST

CLIENT : ORIENTAL CONSULTANTS CO. LTD.

BH-01 1.50 1.80 SPT - - - 2 93 5 - N/P - -

BH-02 0.00 0.50 D/S - - - 1 15 59 25 59 34 25 2.54

BH-03 0.00 0.50 D/S - - - 29 41 23 7 40 27 13 2.6

BH-04 0.00 0.50 D/S - - - 4 22 55 19 61 37 24 2.68

1.50 1.95 SPT - - - 7 41 43 9 60 35 25 2.58

3.00 3.45 SPT - - - 7 63 23 7 44 30 14 2.64

BH-05 0.00 0.50 D/S - - - 3 54 36 7 37 29 8 2.66

Project : PREPARATORY SURVEY ON THE URBAN RAILWAY PROJECT IN PUNE

Uniaxial Corrected Uniaxial

Checked By: VN Approved by : ST

Table A20-1 Traffic Volume Count Sheet

Urban Railway Project in Pune City

Source: Study Team

Urban Railway Project in Pune City

Name of the Road : Interviewer :

Direction: Time (24:00 Hour Format)

"Do you use public

Source: Study Team

Urban Railway Project in Pune City

1 Personal Details 2 Vehicle Ownership 3 Monthly Income in Rs

Source: Study Team

Urban Railway Project in Pune City

A/C City Non-A/C City Interstate School

Source: Study Team

Urban Railway Project in Pune City

No. of Passengers No. of Passengers

A/C City Service Non-A/C City

Source: Study Team

Urban Railway Project in Pune City

Road Name: Sheet No: Date: