REVISED Proposal Bruktawit
REVISED Proposal Bruktawit
REVISED Proposal Bruktawit
BY
BIRUKTAWIT BEZABIH
February 2024
ARBAMINCH ETHIOPIA
THE EFFECT OF ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE ON EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE:
THE CASE OF ARBAMINCH UNIVERSITY
BY
BIRUKTAWIT BEZABIH
ADVISOR: AWEL BEKER (ASSi. Prof.)
FEBRUARY, 2024
ARBAMINCH UNIVERSITY” is my original work and has not been presented for any other
university, and all source of material used for this thesis proposal have been duly acknowledged.
i
ADVISOR’S PROPOSAL APPROVAL SHEET
This is to certify that the thesis proposal entitled “ I hereby declare that this MA thesis proposal
entitled as “THE EFFECT OF ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE ON EMPLOYEE
PERFORMANCE: THE CASE OF ARBAMINCH UNIVERSITY has been developed by
BIRUKTAWIT BEZABIH in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of masters
with specialization in Development Economics, post-graduate program of the department of
Economics under my supervision. Therefore, I recommend that the student’s proposal can be
presented for review and open oral presentation.
ii
Table of content
DECLARATION..........................................................................................................................................i
This is to certify that the thesis proposal entitled “ I hereby declare that this MA thesis proposal entitled as
“THE EFFECT OF ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE ON EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE: THE CASE
OF ARBAMINCH UNIVERSITY has been developed by BIRUKTAWIT BEZABIH in partial
fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of masters with specialization in Development Economics,
post-graduate program of the department of Economics under my supervision. Therefore, I recommend
that the student’s proposal can be presented for review and open oral presentation....................................ii
Table of content..........................................................................................................................................iii
LIST OF TABLES.......................................................................................................................................v
List of Figure..............................................................................................................................................vi
CHAPTER ONE..........................................................................................................................................1
INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................................................1
CHAPTER TWO.........................................................................................................................................7
iii
Innovative Cultures.................................................................................................................................8
Aggressive Cultures.................................................................................................................................9
Outcome-Oriented Cultures.....................................................................................................................9
Stable Cultures......................................................................................................................................10
People-Oriented Cultures.......................................................................................................................10
Team-Oriented Cultures........................................................................................................................11
CHAPTER THREE...................................................................................................................................16
3. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY...........................................................................................................16
References.................................................................................................................................................24
iv
LIST OF TABLES
v
List of Figure
Figure 2.1: Conceptual Framework of the Study…………………………………………16
vi
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
Culture is the result of human creation that is produced and has been used as part of the order of
everyday life. A culture that is applied and used in life during a certain period will influence the
pattern of formation of a society. Because of that, it is not impossible to change a culture, as long
as there is a strong will and enthusiasm to make that change, and the only people who can change
it are the humans themselves (Fahmi, 2016:49)
Today's competitive business environment, creating a positive and strong organizational culture
has become the main focus of the company to improve employee performance (Iskamto, 2021;
Jufrizen et al., 2021). Organizational culture reflects the values, norms, beliefs, and practices that
shape the identity and way of working of a company. A good organizational culture provides
clear direction, motivates employees, and influences their decisions and actions (Adam et al.,
2020).
A good organizational culture can also increase cooperation and collaboration between
employees, reduce interpersonal conflicts, and create an inclusive work environment. Through a
strong organizational culture, companies can inspire employees to adopt high performance
standards, innovation, and customer orientation, which in turn can increase the company's
competitive advantage.(Jufrizen et al., 2021)
However, despite the strong influence of organizational culture on employee performance, there
may be a gap between the culture desired by the company and the culture that is actually
embraced by employees. This gap occurs when there is a discrepancy between the values
officially declared by the company and the daily practices in the workplace. This misalignment
can result in employee dissatisfaction, frustration, and even decreased performance (Ekosusilo,
2020; Hasibuan & Bangun, 2020).
Therefore, this study aims to investigate the effect of organizational culture on employee
performance in Arbaminch University. This study will also explore the factors that influence an
effective organizational culture, and identify gaps that may occur between the desired culture and
that which is lived by employees.
2
1.2 Statement of the Problem
Human being is inseparable from culture. Where there is human being, there is culture. Different
studies were conducted to identify organizational culture parameters that affect employee
performance. The finding of Etalong (2018) shows that Organizational norms can also be
reflected on how it rewards performance, such as awards for diligence, praise for well-behaved
employee(s) in the month, quarter, or even a year
The existing literature on organization culture and employee performance mainly focused and
carried out in developed countries and considering the determinants, influences and composition
of the culture it was not applied universally in different environments like developing countries
(Lydiah, 2014). However, some studies were conducted on organizational culture and employee
performance from other wider dimensions in developing countries such as Nigeria, Kenya and
Somalia but focused only on positive effects of organizational culture.
Despite the strong influence of organizational culture on employee performance, there may
be a gap between the culture desired by the company and the culture that is actually embraced by
employees. This gap occurs when there is a discrepancy between the values officially declared
by the company and the daily practices in the workplace. This misalignment can result in
employee dissatisfaction, frustration, and even decreased performance (Ekosusilo, 2020;
Hasibuan & Bangun, 2020).
Njugi and Nickson (2014) found in their study that organization culture has a great influence on
performance as it dictates how things are done, organization’s philosophy, work environment,
performance targets, and organizations stability. However, Lahiry (1994) argues a weak relation
between organization culture and performance. It is these diverse results that give room for more
research to be done on the relationship between organizational culture and employee
performances. According to Ojo (2008) despite the studies on organizational culture in the last
few decades, the empirical evidences emerging from various studies about the effect of
organizational culture on performance have so far yielded varied results that are inconclusive and
contradictory. He further states that there is no agreement on the precise nature of the
relationship between organizational culture and performance.
3
Various complaints and public dissatisfaction with public services indicate the urgency
of an expectation that changes in the performance of government employees in a better way.
To support this change, it is necessary to have a standard reference imposed by an
organization. The standard reference is the organizational culture that systematically guides
employees to increase their work commitment to the organization.
Arbaminch University, one of the oldest public university has being producing qualified
employees and experts in engineering and other areas of the study. There are many graduates of
Arbaminch University currently working in international organizations, at ministry level in
Ethiopia and at higher official’s levels in the country. However, the 2022 annual reports of the
Arbaminch University show that, turnover rate of employees both academic and administrative
staffs is high. Many mass Medias such as Walta TV, ESAT TV and Abay TV repeatedly
reported the prevalence of corruption trends in Arbaminch University and showed the existence
of poor governance in the university. Why corruption is a series problem in Arbaminch
University? Is due to poor organizational culture? Previous research studies conducted on
organizational culture have different gaps. Some studies are narrow in scope and only depend on
one or two variables. Other have methodological gap and do not clearly shows methodology
used and models applied for further investigation. Many studies were conducted in developing
countries and focus on European cultures ignoring Ethiopians. Some studies conclude that
organizational culture has no effect on employee performance. Therefore, , this study will try to
fill the previous research gap and explore organizational cultures of Arbaminch University. .
4
1.4 Objective of the study
1.4.1 General Objective
The general objective of this study is to investigate the effect of organizational culture on
employee performance in Arbaminch University.
1.4.2 Specific Objectives
6
CHAPTER TWO
The main idea of culture comes from sharing in learning processes that have been based upon
systematic allocation of resources. (Titiev, 2001) The cognitive systems of human that helps in
improving thinking and decision making were based upon organization culture. (Pettigrew 2017)
The multifaceted set of beliefs, assumptions and values helps in presenting different level of
culture by conducting business at an effective manner. The normative glue based upon
organization culture helps in holding overall management effectiveness.( Tichy 2018). The
concept of effective organization culture helps in improving business decisions. The survival of
culture in an organization lies upon national and foreign culture differentiation in
culture management. (Schein, 2020) The culture of organization has been affected by attitudes,
norms and beliefs that lead to strong communication between employees
7
2.2 Dimensions of Organizational Culture
Different studies conducted across the world discussed dimensions of organizational culture and
group them in different ways. Jiddah et.al (2016) identified organizational dimensions as
involvement, consistency and organizational mission. On the other hand Kien (2014) framed
organizational culture into six categories: Process-oriented vs. results-oriented which is
concerned with effectiveness of an organization. Job-oriented versus employee-oriented which
focus on management philosophy. Professional versus local, professional are assigned based on
their professional development and ability where as local is based on identity of member or a
group a culture. Open system and closed system which is concerned with exchange of
information between organizations and its external environment. Tight vs. lose control which
exercises amount of internal control, structuring and discipline. The last dimension is pragmatic
versus normative in which organization focus is either on external environment or internal
environment. Denison and Neale (2011) identifies four cultural traits Involvement, Consistency,
Adaptability and Mission. These underlying traits are expressed in terms of a set of managerial
practices. Schein (2004) believed that there are three levels in an organization culture and his
model focuses on artifacts, values, and assumptions. The artifact include The dress code of the
employees, office furniture, facilities, behavior of the employees, mission and vision of the
organization all come. The values of the individuals working in the organization play an
important role in deciding the organization culture. Edgar (2013) developed a model based on
the belief that cultures can be distinguished by values that are reinforced within organizations
and identified seven organizational culture dimensions namely Innovation and risk taking,
Stability, Respect for People, Outcome Orientation, and Attention to Detail, Team Orientation,
and Aggressiveness.
Innovative Cultures
According to the OCP framework, companies that have innovative cultures are flexible and adaptable,
and experiment with new ideas. These companies are characterized by a flat hierarchy in which titles and
other status distinctions tend to be downplayed. For example, W. L. Gore & Associates Inc. is a company
with innovative products such as GORE-TEX® (the breathable fabric that is windproof and waterproof),
8
Glide dental floss, and Elixir guitar strings, earning the company the distinction of being elected as the
most innovative company in the United States by Fast Company magazine in 2004. W. L. Gore
consistently manages to innovate and capture the majority of market share in a wide variety of industries,
in large part due to its unique culture. In this company, employees do not have bosses in the traditional
sense, and risk taking is encouraged by celebrating failures as well as successes. Deutschman, A. (2004,
December). The fabric of creativity. Fast Company, 89, 54–62. Companies such as W. L. Gore,
Genentech Inc., and Google also encourage their employees to take risks by allowing engineers to devote
20% of their time to projects of their own choosing. Deutschman, A. (2004, December). The fabric of
creativity. Fast Company, 89, 54–62; Morris, B., Burke, D., & Neering, P. (2006, January 23). The best
place to work now. Fortune, 153, 78–86.
Aggressive Cultures
Outcome-Oriented Cultures
The OCP framework describes outcome-oriented cultures as those that emphasize achievement, results,
and action as important values. Employees are trained and mentored to sell company products effectively,
and they learn how much money their department made every day. Copeland, M. V. (2004, July). Best
Buy’s selling machine. Business 2.0, 5, 92–102. In 2005, the company implemented a results oriented
work environment (ROWE) program that allows employees to work anywhere and anytime; they are
9
evaluated based on results and fulfillment of clearly outlined objectives. Thompson, J. (2005, September).
The time we waste. Management Today, pp. 44–47. Outcome-oriented cultures hold employees as well as
managers accountable for success and utilize systems that reward employee and group output. In these
companies, it is more common to see rewards tied to performance indicators as opposed to seniority or
loyalty. Research indicates that organizations that have a performance-oriented culture tend to outperform
companies that are lacking such a culture.Nohria, N., Joyce, W., & Roberson, B. (2003, July). What really
works. Harvard Business Review, 81, 42–52. At the same time, some outcome-oriented companies may
have such a high drive for outcomes and measurable performance objectives that they may suffer negative
consequences. Companies overrewarding employee performance such as Enron Corporation and
WorldCom experienced well-publicized business and ethical failures. When performance pressures lead
to a culture where unethical behaviors become the norm, individuals see their peers as rivals and short-
term results are rewarded; the resulting unhealthy work environment serves as a liability. Probst, G., &
Raisch, S. (2005). Organizational crisis: The logic of failure. Academy of Management Executive, 19, 90–
105.
Stable Cultures
Stable cultures are predictable, rule-oriented, and bureaucratic. These organizations aim to coordinate and
align individual effort for greatest levels of efficiency. When the environment is stable and certain, these
cultures may help the organization be effective by providing stable and constant levels of output.
Westrum, R. (2004, August). These cultures prevent quick action, and as a result may be a misfit to a
changing and dynamic environment. Public sector institutions may be viewed as stable cultures. Its
bureaucratic culture is blamed for killing good ideas in early stages and preventing the company from
innovating. When the company started a change program to increase the agility of its culture, one of their
first actions was to fight bureaucracy with more bureaucracy: They created the new position of VP of
business process simplification, which was later eliminated. Boyle, M. (2004, November 15). Kraft’s
arrested development. Fortune, 150, 144; Thompson, S. (2005, February 28). Kraft simplification strategy
anything but. Advertising Age, 76, 3–63; Thompson, S. (2006, September 18). Kraft CEO slams
company, trims marketing staff. Advertising Age, 77, 3–62.
People-Oriented Cultures
People-oriented cultures value fairness, supportiveness, and respect for individual rights. These
organizations truly live the mantra that “people are their greatest asset.” In addition to having fair
10
procedures and management styles, these companies create an atmosphere where work is fun and
employees do not feel required to choose between work and other aspects of their lives. In these
organizations, there is a greater emphasis on and expectation of treating people with respect and
dignity.Erdogan, B., Liden, R. C., & Kraimer, M. L. (2006). Justice and leader-member exchange: The
moderating role of organizational culture. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 395–406. One study of
new employees in accounting companies found that employees, on average, stayed 14 months longer in
companies with people-oriented cultures.Sheridan, J. (1992). Organizational culture and employee
retention. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 1036–1056. Starbucks Corporation is an example of a
people-oriented culture. The company pays employees above minimum wage, offers health care and
tuition reimbursement benefits to its part-time as well as full-time employees, and has creative perks such
as weekly free coffee for all associates. As a result of these policies, the company benefits from a
turnover rate lower than the industry average.Weber, G. (2005, February). Preserving the counter
culture. Workforce Management, 84, 28–34; Motivation secrets of the 100 best employers. (2003,
October). HR Focus, 80, 1–15. The company is routinely ranked as one of the best places to work
by Fortune magazine.
Team-Oriented Cultures
Companies with team-oriented cultures are collaborative and emphasize cooperation among employees.
For example, Southwest Airlines Company facilitates a team-oriented culture by cross-training its
employees so that they are capable of helping each other when needed. The company also places
emphasis on training intact work teams.Bolino, M. C., & Turnley, W. H. (2003). Going the extra mile:
Cultivating and managing employee citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Executive, 17, 60–
71. Employees participate in twice daily meetings named “morning overview meetings” (MOM) and
daily afternoon discussions (DAD) where they collaborate to understand sources of problems and
determine future courses of action. In Southwest’s selection system, applicants who are not viewed as
team players are not hired as employees. Miles, S. J., & Mangold, G. (2005). Positioning Southwest
Airlines through employee branding. Business Horizons, 48, 535–545. In team-oriented organizations,
members tend to have more positive relationships with their coworkers and particularly with their
managers.Erdogan, B., Liden, R. C., & Kraimer, M. L. (2006). Justice and leader-member exchange: The
moderating role of organizational culture. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 395–406.
11
2.3 Functions of Organizational Culture
Organizational culture has different functions in the life of any organizations. It plays several
important roles within an organization. As such it provides a sense of identity and generates
organizational commitment as well as commitment to the organization’s mission and clarifies
and reinforces standards of behavior (Greenberg, 2003). According to (Patel, 2014), the
functions of organizational culture can manifest itself through creating the feeling of identity
among personnel and commitment to the organization and competitive edge to enable the
members (especially new members) in the organization to well understand acceptable behavior
and social system stability.
Dwirantwi (2012) indicates that culture helps to account for variations among organizations and
managers, both nationally and internationally. Culture helps to explain why different groups of
people perceive things in their own way and perform things differently from other groups.
Culture can help reduce complexity and uncertainty. It provides a consistency in outlook and
values, and makes possible the process of decision-making, co-ordination and control. There is
nothing accidental about cultural strengths. There is a relationship between an organizations
culture and its performance. And he explains that culture performs the four main functions.
First and foremost, Culture supplements rational management creation of work. Culture is a
time- consuming process. He continues by saying that, organization culture cannot suddenly
change the behavior of people in an organization. Culture communicates to people through
symbols, values, physical settings, and language, and, thereby supplements the rational
management tools such as technology and structure.(Luke,2018).
The second function is it facilitates induction and socialization. Induction is a process through
which new entrants to an organization are socialized and indoctrinated in the expectations of the
organization; its cultural norms, and undefined conduct. The newcomer imbibes the culture of
the organization, which may involve changing his / her attitudes and beliefs to achieving an
internalized commitment to the organization (Sami, 2015)
12
where members share a set of beliefs, values, and assumptions which would influence their
behavior in an invisible way. Where culture has been fully assimilated by people, they
persistently indulge in a typical behavior in a spontaneous way. Promotion of the culture of
quality can helps achieve good business results.
According to Prawirosento (2016), the measure of good and bad performance of and employee is
measured by effectiveness and efficiency. Kasmire (2019), noticed that Clarity of authority and
responsibility of each person in an organization support the performance of employees. Kasmire
13
(2019) indicated that quality, quantity, effective time utilization, cost effectiveness and good
interpersonal communication.
Many scholars and managers contend that if employees are adequately informed about matters
concerning them and given the chance to make decisions related to their work, there will be
benefits for both the organization and the individual (Shadur, Kienzle, Rodwell, 2005). PDM
enhances production efficiency, employee morale, and job satisfaction; it also builds a better
sense of control and trust in the employees (Chang & Lorenzi, 2012). When employees are
afforded opportunities to contribute ideas and suggestions in decision -making, firm performance
may increase because deep employee involvement in decision-making maximizes the diversity
of perspectives (Kemelgor, 2002).
Professionalism
Employees are selected and identified with their profession and they are exposed to on job and of
job training related to their work
This dimension deals with amount of internal control structure and discipline. It expresses
formaility and punctuality level of employees in the organization
Job oriented philosophy assumes responsibility for the employees job performance only.
Employee Motivation
This dimension involves creating the acceptance of employees to perform in their best in terms
of their abilities.
Employee commitment:
14
This element focuses to the extent of manager-subordinate relationship in the organization to
enhance organizational excellence.
Team Orientation
This dimension analyses the amount of cooperation and coordination among the employees of
different departments
Figure 2-1: Conceptual Framework on the Relationship between organizational culture , and
employee Performance
Professionalism
Productivity
Decision making ability
Team orientation Creativity and innovation
Quality work
Leading ability
Strict work discipline Efficiency in resource use
Effectiveness
Job Oriented
Employee commitment
Organizational culture
Figure 2.1: Conceptual Framework of the Study (source: own computation, 2024)
15
CHAPTER THREE
3. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
This chapter presented a methodology followed and applied during data collection. It presents
description of the study organization, population, research methods of data collection, data
analysis and interpretation
16
research approaches. The quantitative approach is will used to measure phenomena using
numbers in statistical procedures. In order to get accurate data from respondents, researcher will
use questionnaire as means of data collection instruments.
As stated in the background of the organization there are 4610 employees in Arbaminch
University, a representative sample size was selected from the total population by using Yamane
Taro (1967) sample size determination formula. It is computed as follow;
N
n= 2
1+ N (e)
Where:
n = Desired sample size
N = Total population
e = Accepted error limit (0.1 on the basis of 90% degree of confidence).
If the N, population size = 4610, find n, the required sample size.
Solution:
N 4610 4610 4610 4610
n= = = = = =368
1+ N (e) 1+ 4610(0.5) 1+ 4610(0.05) 1+11.525 12.525
2 2
17
With the use of proportionate stratified sampling technique followed by simple random sampling
a total of 368 respondents will be selected. Therefore 368 respondents will be participated in this
research.
Therefore, 368 employee will be selected randomly in proportion to their total population size
from each selected campus as shown in Table 3.1
Academic Administrative
2 Kulufo 420 9 13 21
3 Nechsar 620 13 21 28
4 Chamo 1420 31 37 76
5 Abaya 630 13 23 27
Campus
18
3.6 Data Collection Tool
In collecting the data, the researcher will rely on the questionnaire that included several themes
according to the questions and objectives of the study. The questionnaire will be subjected to the
standards of honesty and consistency. Questionnaire will include both open ended and closed
ended questions. . The questionnaire will consist three sections. The first section represents the
general information of the respondents. The second section represents the data on organizational
culture while section three represents data on employee performance. Therefore, by using 5 -
point Likert scale, on which to express the respondent’s level of agreement closed ended
questionnaire will be used. Questionnaire will be based on the objective of the study.
19
2014), the Cronbach’s alpha formula reduces the time required to compute a reliability
coefficient in other methods.
Before the data collection made, researcher will develop the questionnaire based on the literature
review by addressing the basic research question and taste the data collection tools via pre-test
and also the research advisor comments, suggestions and all required information to valid the
study. Validity indicates the soundness or extent to which an instrument measures the construct
was aiming to measure Goodwin (1995). According to Trochim, (2005) cited by Mary Calist
Irema, (2015) data validity refers to empirical measurement which adequately reflects the real
meaning of the concept under study.
20
4. WORK PLAN /TIME SCHEDULE
The overall time required by the researcher for running and completing each activity is estimated
as follows.
21
5. LOGISTICS & BUDGET BREAKDOWN
To complete the research work, the following budget breakdown is allocated to required
materials during the research work. This breakdown includes stationary cost, personal expenses
for field work and transportation cost
s/No Items Unit quantity Unit price in birr Total cost birr
7 Ruler No 5 20 100
Sub-total 7, 890
S/No Description unit No of days Daily payment in birr Total expense in birr
22
Table 5: Transport Cost
Sub-total 2,300
23
References
Fahmi, Irham. 2016. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Teori dan Aplikasi. Bandung: Alfabeta
Dolan, S. and Lingham, T., (Ed). (2012). Introduction to International Organizational Behavior.
Logan Ltd
Umi, Zahriah Wita, Hamidah Nayati Utami, Ika Ruhana. 2015. “Pengaruh Budaya Organisasi
Terhadap
Kinerja Karyawan Pada PT. PLN (Persero) Distribusi Jawa Timur Area Malang”. Jurnal
Administrasi Bisnis (JAB). Vol. 2 No. 1
Iskamto, D. (2021). Stress and Its Impact on Employee Performance. International Journal of
Social
and Management Studies, 2, Article 3. https://doi.org/10.5555/ijosmas.v2i3.42
Adam, A., Yuniarsih, T., Ahman, E., & Kusnendi, K. (2020). The Mediation Effect of
Organizational
Commitment in the Relation of Organization Culture and Employee Performance. 260–264.
https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.200131.056
Jufrizen, J., Mukmin, M., Nurmala, D., & Jasin, H. (2021). Effect of Moderation of Work
Motivation
on the Influence of Organizational Culture On Organizational Commitment and Employee
Performance. International Journal of Business Economics (IJBE), 2(2), Article 2.
https://doi.org/10.30596/ijbe.v2i2.6710
Denison, D. R. (Jan 2019). Corporate Culture and Organizational Effectiveness, New York
Hasibuan, P. W., & Bangun, S. (2020). The Influence of Organizational Compensation and
Culture on Employee Performance in PT. Artatel Indokarya. Journal of Research in Business,
Economics, and Education, 2(3), 612–622.
24
25
26