Bcca 6 Ed 01 S6
Bcca 6 Ed 01 S6
Bcca 6 Ed 01 S6
Study Material
Concept of Rural Entrepreneurship
Rural entrepreneurship refers to initiatives and activities of the entrepreneurs related
to the establishment of industrial and business units in the rural areas. Rural
entrepreneurship can be the panacea for the problems to poverty, migration, economic
disparity, unemployment and underdevelopment associated with rural areas and
backward regions.
In India as per the Census of 2011, out of the 121.2 million population in India, the size
of the rural population is 833.1 million which is about 68.84 percent of the total
population. The economic development of India largely depends on the progress of
rural areas and the improvement of the standard of living of rural masses. Rural
entrepreneurship can significantly contribute to national economy by enhancing the
pace of rural development.
It recognizes opportunity in the rural areas and accelerates a unique blend of resources
either inside or outside of agriculture.
According to Government of India, “Any industry located in rural areas, village or town
with a population of 20,000 and. below and an investment of 3 crores in plant and
machinery is classified as a village industry”.
Need For Rural Entrepreneurship (With Development Strategies for Village and Small-
Scale Industries)
The need for developing rural entrepreneurship is to promote rural development in the
country.
v. Rural industries also help preserve the age-old rich heritage of the country by
protecting and promoting art and creativity.
vi. Rural industrialization fosters economic development in rural areas. This checks
migration from rural to urban areas, on the one hand, and lessens the disproportionate
growth in the cities, reduces growth of slums, social tensions, and atmospheric
pollution, on the other.
vii. Rural industries also lead to development without destruction, i.e., the most
desideratum of the time.
Rural industrialization did not receive any significance before Independence of India.
The reason is not difficult to seek. The British Government encouraged imports and
discouraged development of indigenous industries. The Indian art and culture during
this period was at stake in the hands of the British Government.
Rural industries started getting importance only after the independence. This got
expressions in the major policy pronouncements on development in India. For example,
the first Industrial Policy of Independent India, the Industrial Policy Resolution of 1948
emphasised the utilization of local resources and the achievement of local self-
sufficiency in respect of certain essential “consumer goods” as the most suitable
characteristics of cottage and small industries.
There was no looking back since then. While emphasising the creation of employment,
equitable distribution of incomes and an effective mobilisation of capital and skills, the
Industrial Policy Resolution, 1956 pointed out that the characteristics of cottage, village
and small-industries are favourable to the achievement of these objectives.
The major policy plank of the Third Five-Year Plan was to provide employment and
increase the supply of consumer goods and some producer goods through the
development of village and small industries sector. Development of village and rural
industries, including ancillary units of large-scale units was the thrust areas to achieve
the balanced regional development. Introduction of Backward Area Development
Programme including industrial development was a new dimension attached to rural
industrialisation during the Fourth Five-Year Plan.
The Seventh and Eighth Plans changed their gears to rural industrialisation by assigning
importance to the role of institutions in marketing, credit, technology, etc. A number of
projects covering a variety of rural industries, viz., food processing, pottery, leather
items, readymade garments, etc., were taken up by the Khadi and Village Industries
Commission (KVIC) to boost rural industrialisation.
Significance of Rural Entrepreneurship for a Country
The rural entrepreneurship is great importance for a country which has a huge rural
population.
5. The social problems like poverty, inequality, caste distinctions can be reduced by
rural entrepreneurship.
6. Entrepreneurship in the rural areas can be taken up as career by the youths. The rural
youth can be encouraged and awakened.
7. Rural entrepreneurship can improve the standard of living in rural areas. Their
increasing opportunities for growth and prosperity can uplift the rural communities.
8. The local resources available in the rural areas are best known to local rural
population. Rural entrepreneurship can ensure the most efficient and effective use of
limited resources by the entrepreneurs that can contribute to the overall economic
development of rural areas.
9. Rural entrepreneurship can play a significant role in increasing the foreign exchange
earnings of the country if their products are recognized and demanded abroad.
10. Rural entrepreneurship can generate more employment, output, and wealth from
the rural areas and thus contribute to the growth and improvement of per capita
income of rural people.
In fact, the growth of rural industries, based primarily on traditional occupations, may
well accentuate the social distance among the caste groups, despite the betterment they
may bring about in the economic conditions of artisans and craftsmen. No doubt, even
non- traditional activities exhibit concentration by social groups, though to a smaller
extent than the traditional industries; but such concentration is primarily based on class
distinction in terms of ownership resources, rather than on the traditional caste-
occupation association.
Most rural industries, however, have a limited capacity for generating even as
subsistence income for those engaged in them and have not shown a very encouraging
record of growth in the recent past. Only blacksmith, carpentry and handloom have
shown a good promise in so far as the value added per worker and their dependents.
The basic reason for their low income-generating capacity lies in their tiny size in terms
of their physical volume of output. Most units are run on a household basis, and do
provide full employment to all the household workers.
Blacksmith, carpentry, handloom and leather products fit quite well in this category. In
order, however, that rural industrialisation becomes an effective tool for the
development of rural areas as well as for the better integration of the rural and urban
sectors, equal emphasis should be laid on the development of non-traditional industries
in this areas. Many of them may not be linked with rural areas in terms either of use of
local materials or of having a local market, but would be effective in providing
productive employment to rural labour.
The long-term strategy of rural industrialisation would require not merely the
development of traditional rural industries, but also a programme of infusing
increasingly a larger component of modern consumer and other industries in rural
areas.
Besides reducing the income gap between the two sectors, it is also desirable that rural
industries use technologies which are in line with the technological pattern of the
emerging industrial structure in the country as a whole. The upgradation of relatively
modern-technology industries in rural areas alone are likely to make rural industries an
integral part of the industrialisation process in the country.
The technology used in rural industries varies terms of the use of machinery,
equipment, non-human energy, and, therefore, of capital intensity; but, by and large, the
activities in which mechanical devices and capital equipment are used yield a
reasonable income only to those who are engaged in them.
At the same time, the use of such devices and equipment neither turn these industries
into “capital intensive” nor reduce the employment potential. It only makes
employment more effective in terms of income generation.
One of the reasons which accounts for the fact that the productivity and income aspects
of rural industries have received less attention than employment creation lies in the
assumption that these industries are subsidiary activities on the part of the households,
for which agriculture or some other activities is their main occupation; and therefore,
they only reduce underemployment and supplement their income from their major
activity. In fact, however, this assumption is not valid.
For the households and workers engaged in rural industries, their occupation in them is
their sole or at least the main source of income. Most of them do not even have another
activity as a subsidiary occupation. These industries will, therefore, have to be seen as
the effective means of providing full employment and as the only source of income for
those engaged in them.
The need for industrial employment on a full-time basis is likely to increase, for the
development of agriculture, even if rapid, will absorb only a part of the increasing rural
labour force.
It is necessary to spell out the concept of rural industrialisation. It begins with the
assessment of resources, human and material, locally available in a selected area.
Assessment is also made of the pattern of demand. Present and future and an area-wise
production plan is formulated for ensuring minimum needs of the people by using local
resources, skill and appropriate technology.
As rural industries increase in progress, in number and diversity, and as their share of
industrial production begins to grow, it becomes even more important that they
improve efficiency in their operations.
Five main elements in the success of these programmes are – the orientation of the
rural entrepreneurs and rural artisans to a more forward-looking approach and
flexibility of loan basis to meet the cost of modernisation and the role of appropriate
technology and marketing in modernisation and improvement efficiency of rural
industries.
The basis objective of the programme is to set the rural industries — traditional and
non-traditional — on a path of growth so that they are able to complete, on more equal
terms, with the urban industries
4. Rural industrialisation leads to the development of rural areas thereby lessening the
disproportionate growth in large cities, reducing the growth of slums, social tensions,
exploitation and atmospheric pollution.
5. Rural industries will strive to build up village republics and human resources
development.
Although, agriculture is the main stay of the rural economy, rural industry is a
complementary industry. The pressure of population on land is already high and
increasing. In the process, it has resulted in a large surplus of labour, both educated as
well as uneducated in rural areas. Agriculture alone cannot absorb the entire surplus
force and hence the need for rural industries. If we consider rural industry as a main
stay, agriculture is an important part of this process.
The development of rural industries increases the level of income in rural areas, and
tends to break down the old self-sufficiency of the family and lessen its cohesiveness,
creating opportunities for youth, women and the able bodied as well in changing the
pattern of leisure and work.
Rural industrialisation should be looked upon not merely as way of containing the rural
workers and stopping them from migrating to urban areas by providing them some kind
of remunerative employment in the villages, but as a dynamic element in process of
raising the productivity and income levels of the workers in areas.
The main characteristics of these industries are to develop local initiative cooperation
and spirit of self-reliance in the economy and at the same time, help in utilisation of the
available manpower for processing locally available raw materials by adopting simple
techniques.
These decentralised industries require less gestation period on the one hand and
produce goods of common necessities on the other.
Rural industrialisation has taken roots in the rural economy in India. This is so because
simple forms of manufacture typical of consumer goods industries and varied service
industries, are everywhere developed before the more complex process involved in the
production of capital goods, and because the size of the home market at the time of
industrialisation prohibits the establishment of optimum- sized plants in the production
of certain capital goods.
Yet another policy measure adopted and implemented shall be to use products
manufactured by rural industries in preference to imported goods, particularly in urban
market segment. This will open up a vast market both in urban as well as rural areas for
the goods manufactured by rural industries and pave the way for its rapid growth in the
coming years.
4. There should be a nationwide organisation, with separate sections for each product
or group of products which are produced in the rural industrial sector. The existing
organisations like the Khadi and Village Industries Board, Handlooms Board and
Handicrafts Board can be utilised for the products which they are already handling.
5. Up-to-date technology should be used so that the industrial units can be competitive;
obsolete technologies should not be adopted in the name of “appropriate technology”
etc.
6. While the government may provide necessary benefits, the units should be set up on a
cooperative basis or through individual enterprise, and not by government
departments.