1 s2.0 S1556086415326204 Main
1 s2.0 S1556086415326204 Main
1 s2.0 S1556086415326204 Main
Imaging Thymoma
Edith M. Marom, MD
S296 Journal of Thoracic Oncology • Volume 5, Number 10, Supplement 4, October 2010
Journal of Thoracic Oncology • Volume 5, Number 10, Supplement 4, October 2010 Imaging Thymoma
Copyright © 2010 by the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer S297
Marom Journal of Thoracic Oncology • Volume 5, Number 10, Supplement 4, October 2010
S298 Copyright © 2010 by the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer
Journal of Thoracic Oncology • Volume 5, Number 10, Supplement 4, October 2010 Imaging Thymoma
Copyright © 2010 by the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer S299
Marom Journal of Thoracic Oncology • Volume 5, Number 10, Supplement 4, October 2010
S300 Copyright © 2010 by the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer
Journal of Thoracic Oncology • Volume 5, Number 10, Supplement 4, October 2010 Imaging Thymoma
diagnostic criteria overlap considerably.36 –38 Evaluation of value (SUV), overlaps between the low-grade and high-grade
the thymus with thallium 201 (201Tl) is equal or superior to thymomas.40 – 43 Neither the FDG SUV nor another tracer
that with CT. Using the early (15 minutes) and delayed used with PET, carbon 11-labeled acetate can differentiate
phases (180 minutes) after injection is helpful in differenti- between early thymoma, Masaoka stage I/II tumors, and stage
ating between the normal thymus, hyperplastic thymus, and III/IV tumors. Thus, it cannot aid in trying to establish who
thymoma, in patients with myasthenia gravis.36 However, the may benefit from neoadjuvant therapy. In addition, the FDG
examination suffers from low resolution, low throughput, and activity of some thymomas can be similar to the mediastinal
overlap in criteria. blood activity and increased FDG uptake, similar to that seen
Indium 111 octreotide shows increased uptake with in thymomas that can be seen in patients with thymic hyper-
thymoma but does not differentiate hyperplasia from normal plasia. The latter is more common in the pediatric population,
thymus. Once again, its low spatial resolution limits its use found in 73% of untreated patients up to the age of 13 years
(Figure 8), but it has one advantage over morphologic imag- and in 8% of patients in their fourth decade.44 Patterns of
ing. It is sometimes used to determine thymic tumor uptake to FDG activity and not just the SUV itself, in conjunction with
identify patients who may respond to treatment with oct- the CT appearance of the mediastinal abnormality, are helpful
reotide, an octapeptide somatostatin analog that has a high in establishing the nature of disease. As with other malignan-
cies, FDG-PET was shown in a small thymoma study to be
affinity for a selective somatostatin subtype (SST2) receptor.
particularly useful in the detection of distant malignant
In normal human thymus, the thymic epithelial cells seem to
spread41 (Figure 8). Whether this will prove to be cost
be the major site of the SST production. Neuroendocrine
beneficial has not yet been shown.
tumors show high affinity for octreotide and can be treated
with it. Octreotide alone or in combination with prednisone is
sometimes used as salvage therapy for patients with relapse FOLLOW-UP
of advanced thymoma.39 There are no published recommendations as to the
During the last decade, positron emission tomography frequency and timing of follow-up after treatment of thy-
(PET), in particular with [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) has moma nor is there consensus as to the imaging modality to be
proven useful for staging and imaging many tumors. Studies used in this follow-up. Because late recurrence in thymoma is
assessing the evaluation of thymoma with FDG-PET are not uncommon, seen even more than 5 or 10 years after
small, but the data are not promising. Although FDG uptake resection, follow-up may be lengthy. Because complete re-
was found to be much higher in thymic cancer than thymoma, section of recurrence obtains similar outcome compared with
the amount of uptake, or as it is termed standardized uptake those patients without recurrence, this follow-up may be
Copyright © 2010 by the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer S301
Marom Journal of Thoracic Oncology • Volume 5, Number 10, Supplement 4, October 2010
justified.45– 47 Currently, CT is most commonly used for this 17. Wright CD, Wain JC, Wong DR, et al. Predictors of recurrence in
follow-up. With the increased public concern of radiation in thymic tumors: importance of invasion, World Health Organization
histology, and size. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005;130:1413–1421.
young patients, it is unknown whether MRI will take a greater 18. Myojin M, Choi NC, Wright CD, et al. Stage III thymoma: pattern of
role in this follow-up, despite its lower spatial resolution and failure after surgery and postoperative radiotherapy and its implication
lengthy examination, when compared with CT. It also re- for future study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2000;46:927–933.
mains to be seen whether FDG-PET will be used in this 19. Girard N, Mornex F, Van Houtte P, et al. Thymoma: a focus on current
follow-up or it will be reserved for selected cases such as therapeutic management. J Thorac Oncol 2009;4:119 –126.
20. Falkson CB, Bezjak A, Darling G, et al. The management of thymoma: a
differentiating between nodular radiation changes and recur- systematic review and practice guideline. J Thorac Oncol 2009;4:911–919.
rence within the radiation field. If FDG uptake values will be 21. Rea F, Sartori F, Loy M, et al. Chemotherapy and operation for invasive
used to monitor disease progression/response, the FDG PET thymoma. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1993;106:543–549.
scan must be performed in a meticulous matter, in the same 22. Venuta F, Rendina EA, Longo F, et al. Long-term outcome after
institution adhering to a strict imaging protocol, as SUV multimodality treatment for stage III thymic tumors. Ann Thorac Surg
2003;76:1866 –1872; discussion 1872.
measurements can be affected by many technical factors. 23. Venuta F, Rendina EA, Pescarmona EO, et al. Multimodality treatment
of thymoma: a prospective study. Ann Thorac Surg 1997;64:1585–1591;
discussion 1591–1592.
CONCLUSION 24. Yakushiji S, Tateishi U, Nagai S, et al. Computed tomographic findings
Imaging plays a crucial role in the diagnosis, staging, and prognosis in thymic epithelial tumor patients. J Comput Assist
and follow-up of patients with thymoma. The advantages and Tomogr 2008;32:799 – 805.
25. Jeong YJ, Lee KS, Kim J, et al. Does CT of thymic epithelial tumors
disadvantages of each imaging modality were discussed. enable us to differentiate histologic subtypes and predict prognosis? AJR
Currently, CT is the cross-sectional modality of choice for Am J Roentgenol 2004;183:283–289.
imaging thymoma. Whether MRI and/or PET-CT will play an 26. Sadohara J, Fujimoto K, Muller NL, et al. Thymic epithelial tumors:
increasing role in this disease remains to be seen. Hopefully, comparison of CT and MR imaging findings of low-risk thymomas, high-
collaborative international studies48 will improve our under- risk thymomas, and thymic carcinomas. Eur J Radiol 2006;60:70 –79.
27. Tomiyama N, Johkoh T, Mihara N, et al. Using the World Health
standing of this disease and enable us to predict local staging Organization Classification of thymic epithelial neoplasms to describe
by imaging to individualize patient care before surgery. CT findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002;179:881– 886.
28. Chalabreysse L, Roy P, Cordier JF, et al. Correlation of the WHO schema
for the classification of thymic epithelial neoplasms with prognosis: a
REFERENCES retrospective study of 90 tumors. Am J Surg Pathol 2002;26:1605–1611.
1. Duwe BV, Sterman DH, Musani AI. Tumors of the mediastinum. Chest 29. Rieker RJ, Hoegel J, Morresi-Hauf A, et al. Histologic classification of
2005;128:2893–2909. thymic epithelial tumors: comparison of established classification
2. Ko SF, Tsai YH, Huang HY, et al. Retrotracheal thymoma masquerad- schemes. Int J Cancer 2002;98:900 –906.
ing as esophageal submucosal tumor. World J Gastroenterol 2005;11: 30. Maher MM, Shepard JA. Imaging of thymoma. Semin Thorac Cardio-
3165–3166. vasc Surg 2005;17:12–19.
3. Orki A, Patlakoglu MS, Tahaoglu C, et al. Malignant invasive thymoma 31. Sakai F, Sone S, Kiyono K, et al. MR imaging of thymoma: radiologic-
in the posterior mediastinum. Ann Thorac Surg 2009;87:1274 –1275. pathologic correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1992;158:751–756.
4. Gray GF, Gutowski WT 3rd. Thymoma. A clinicopathologic study of 54 32. Sakai S, Murayama S, Soeda H, et al. Differential diagnosis between
cases. Am J Surg Pathol 1979;3:235–249. thymoma and non-thymoma by dynamic MR imaging. Acta Radiol
5. Regnard JF, Magdeleinat P, Dromer C, et al. Prognostic factors and 2002;43:262–268.
long-term results after thymoma resection: a series of 307 patients. 33. Strollo DC, Rosado-de-Christenson ML. Tumors of the thymus. J Tho-
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996;112:376 –384. rac Imaging 1999;14:152–171.
6. Blumberg D, Port JL, Weksler B, et al. Thymoma: a multivariate 34. Inaoka T, Takahashi K, Mineta M, et al. Thymic hyperplasia and thymus
analysis of factors predicting survival. Ann Thorac Surg 1995;60:908 – gland tumors: differentiation with chemical shift MR imaging. Radiol-
913; discussion 914. ogy 2007;243:869 – 876.
7. Chen G, Marx A, Wen-Hu C, et al. New WHO histologic classification 35. Takahashi K, Inaoka T, Murakami N, et al. Characterization of the
predicts prognosis of thymic epithelial tumors: a clinicopathologic study normal and hyperplastic thymus on chemical-shift MR imaging. AJR
of 200 thymoma cases from China. Cancer 2002;95:420 – 429.
Am J Roentgenol 2003;180:1265–1269.
8. Restrepo CS, Pandit M, Rojas IC, et al. Imaging findings of expansile
36. Higuchi T, Taki J, Kinuya S, et al. Thymic lesions in patients with
lesions of the thymus. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 2005;34:22–34.
myasthenia gravis: characterization with thallium 201 scintigraphy.
9. Rosado-de-Christenson ML, Galobardes J, Moran CA. Thymoma: ra-
Radiology 2001;221:201–206.
diologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics 1992;12:151–168.
10. Casey EM, Kiel PJ, Loehrer PJ Sr. Clinical management of thymoma 37. Lastoria S, Vergara E, Palmieri G, et al. In vivo detection of malignant
patients. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 2008;22:457– 473. thymic masses by indium-111-DTPA-D-Phe1-octreotide scintigraphy.
11. Suster S, Moran CA. Histologic classification of thymoma: the World J Nucl Med 1998;39:634 – 639.
Health Organization and beyond. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 2008; 38. Sasaki M, Kuwabara Y, Ichiya Y, et al. Differential diagnosis of thymic
22:381–392. tumors using a combination of 11C-methionine PET and FDG PET.
12. Masaoka A, Monden Y, Nakahara K, et al. Follow-up study of thymomas J Nucl Med 1999;40:1595–1601.
with special reference to their clinical stages. Cancer 1981;48:2485–2492. 39. Loehrer PJ Sr, Wang W, Johnson DH, et al. Octreotide alone or with
13. Tomiyama N, Muller NL, Ellis SJ, et al. Invasive and noninvasive thy- prednisone in patients with advanced thymoma and thymic carcinoma:
moma: distinctive CT features. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2001;25:388 –393. an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Phase II Trial. J Clin Oncol
14. Elkiran ET, Abali H, Aksoy S, et al. Thymic epithelial neoplasia: a study 2004;22:293–299.
of 58 cases. Med Oncol 2007;24:197–201. 40. Endo M, Nakagawa K, Ohde Y, et al. Utility of 18FDG-PET for
15. Gripp S, Hilgers K, Wurm R, et al. Thymoma: prognostic factors and differentiating the grade of malignancy in thymic epithelial tumors. Lung
treatment outcomes. Cancer 1998;83:1495–1503. Cancer 2008;61:350 –355.
16. Nakagawa K, Asamura H, Matsuno Y, et al. Thymoma: a clinicopath- 41. Sung YM, Lee KS, Kim BT, et al. 18F-FDG PET/CT of thymic
ologic study based on the new World Health Organization classification. epithelial tumors: usefulness for distinguishing and staging tumor sub-
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003;126:1134 –1140. groups. J Nucl Med 2006;47:1628 –1634.
S302 Copyright © 2010 by the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer
Journal of Thoracic Oncology • Volume 5, Number 10, Supplement 4, October 2010 Imaging Thymoma
42. Kumar A, Regmi SK, Dutta R, et al. Characterization of thymic masses in invasive thymoma under retrograde cerebral perfusion. Ann Thorac
using (18)F-FDG PET-CT. Ann Nucl Med 2009;23:569 –577. Surg 1998;66:263–264.
43. Shibata H, Nomori H, Uno K, et al. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose and 11C- 46. Regnard JF, Zinzindohoue F, Magdeleinat P, et al. Results of re-resection
acetate positron emission tomography are useful modalities for diagnosing for recurrent thymomas. Ann Thorac Surg 1997;64:1593–1598.
the histologic type of thymoma. Cancer 2009;115:2531–2538. 47. Strobel P, Bauer A, Puppe B, et al. Tumor recurrence and survival in
44. Jerushalmi J, Frenkel A, Bar-Shalom R, et al. Physiologic thymic uptake of patients treated for thymomas and thymic squamous cell carcinomas: a
18F-FDG in children and young adults: a PET/CT evaluation of incidence, retrospective analysis. J Clin Oncol 2004;22:1501–1509.
patterns, and relationship to treatment. J Nucl Med 2009;50:849 – 853. 48. Detterbeck F, Giaccone G, Loehrer P, et al. International thymic malig-
45. Fujino S, Tezuka N, Watarida S, et al. Reconstruction of the aortic arch nancy interest group. J Thorac Oncol 2010;5:1–2.
Copyright © 2010 by the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer S303