10 1108 - Jsit 09 2020 0166
10 1108 - Jsit 09 2020 0166
10 1108 - Jsit 09 2020 0166
net/publication/372103447
CITATIONS READS
4 493
5 authors, including:
All content following this page was uploaded by Mohammad Iranmanesh on 04 July 2023.
Technology
Determinants of continuous continuance
intention to use e-government theory
services: an extension of
technology continuance theory
Noor Fareen Abdul Rahim Received 12 September 2020
Revised 1 February 2021
Graduate School of Business, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia 22 July 2021
26 March 2023
Ghazanfar Ali Abbasi Accepted 20 April 2023
Abstract
Purpose – Despite the fact that the success of e-government services is contingent on their continuous
usage, the continuance intention to use e-government services has received extremely little scholarly
attention. This study aims to investigate the determinants of the residents’ continuous intention to use
e-government services.
Design/methodology/approach – The research model was developed based on the integration of
technology continuance theory along with trust, transparency and habit constructs. The authors adopted a
survey approach to collect the data. The data were collected using an online questionnaire from 260 residents
of Penang in Malaysia.
Findings – Results revealed that transparency has a positive effect on both perceived usefulness and trust.
Contrary to earlier studies on e-government, perceived ease of use was found to have no significant
relationship with residents’ perceived usefulness. Similarly, the results also demonstrated that habit was not
significantly related to users’ continuous intention to use e-government services. This study also applied
importance-performance analysis map analysis and discovered that perceived usefulness has the highest
impact on continuous intention to use e-government services, whereas satisfaction was found to have the least
effect.
Declaration of interests:
h The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal
relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
3
ⵧ The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be
considered as potential competing interests.
Funding details: This work was supported by USM’s Research Creativity and Management Office
Journal of Systems and
(RCMO) under Grant [number 6316429]. The authors have disclosed those interests fully to Information Technology
Taylor & Francis, and they have in place an approved plan for managing any potential conflicts © Emerald Publishing Limited
1328-7265
arising from this project. DOI 10.1108/JSIT-09-2020-0166
JSIT Originality/value – This study used an integrative framework and presented an in-depth knowledge of
the basic aspects that contribute to the post-adoption usage process and resident satisfaction, trust and
attitude towards e-government services.
Keywords Continuous intention, Satisfaction, Technology adoption, Digital technology,
Digitalisation, Usage intention
Paper type Research paper
1. Introduction
The increased popularity of information technology (IT) has transformed and influenced
residents’ daily lives (Alshibly and Chiong, 2015). It has also significantly changed the way
residents are provided services by their governments (Talukder et al., 2019; Veeramootoo
et al., 2018). Increasingly, as the public sector modernises, administrations, either national or
regional, are increasingly relying on digital technologies, especially the internet, to provide
benefits to their citizens, a phenomenon dubbed electronic government (e-government)
(Alcaide–Muñoz et al., 2017). E-government is regarded as the latest government
contributions aiming to enhance access to and delivery of government services and provide
the residents with high-quality service with the help of modern connectivity (Shuib et al.,
2019; Husin et al., 2017). According to Lin et al. (2011), e-government is the internet and IT
adaption to transform the effectiveness, accuracy, efficiency and accountability of both
informational and transactional exchanges between residents and their government from a
technological point of view. E-government-related initiatives aim to improve the relationship
between the public and the government (Talukder et al., 2020). Subsequently, e-government
is obtaining impetus worldwide, and many countries are implementing this model due to its
benefits (e.g. e-filling) and its appropriateness to several public service contexts (Shuib et al.,
2019; Veeramootoo et al., 2018).
The global spread of e-government has led researchers to dedicate a considerable amount
of scholarly attention to this area, particularly unearthing citizens’ adoption of e-
government services and their drivers (Mensah and Adams, 2019; Mensah, 2019; Alzahrani
et al., 2018). There is no doubt that successful e-government services are greatly dependent
on greater public engagement. The success of e-government services in any country is
contingent upon their continuous usage. Initial acceptance is a crucial first step in attaining
admiration and acceptance. The long-term viability and sustainable growth of the e-
government platform depend on its continuance usage by its users (Bölen, 2020).
Researchers have already established that attracting first-time users is not as cumbersome
as retaining existing ones (Oghuma et al., 2016).
It was empirically established that the cost of acquiring a new consumer is considerably
higher than keeping the existing ones (Reichheld and Schefter, 2000). As the number of
residents using e-government services rises, concerned authorities need to orchestrate steps
to guarantee continuance usage. Therefore, studies on prominent factors influencing
continuous intention to use e-government services, especially in a developing country like
Malaysia, are not only a creditable initiative but also much warranted in the academic world
(Shuib et al., 2019). Results generated by this study can be used to increase the continuous
usage of e-government services benefitting both residents and the government.
Theoretically, both initial adoption and the continuance usage are two separate notions
and are affected by a mix of different factors (Veeramootoo et al., 2018). The frequency of
users’ future behaviour is dependent on their initial adoption experience (Bölen, 2020). It has
been observed that most of the scholars studying e-government continuous usage have used
constructs from adoption theories. To this end, several theories such as the “theory of
planned behaviour”, “technology acceptance model” (TAM), “unified theory of acceptance Technology
and use of technology”, “IS success model”, “social cognitive theory”, “innovative diffusion” continuance
and “task-technology fit” have been widely applied to investigate the continuance usage
(Shuib et al., 2019; Nabavi et al., 2016). However, it has also been posited that many of these
theory
theories, although valuable to comprehend the initial adoption, may not necessarily be
suitable to examine the continuance usage (Nabavi et al., 2016). Bhattacharjee and Barfar
(2011)’s rigorous and exhaustive literature review concurred with this thought. They stated
that theories that were primarily developed to gauge users’ initial adoption are inaptly
applied to predict users’ continuance of behaviour. Therefore, instead of relying on
traditional models, researchers need to adopt more appropriate models and theories to
examine users’ continuance of behaviour (Nabavi et al., 2016).
This research validates an integrative model of continuous usage intention of
e-government services by applying the technology continuance theory (TCT) (Foroughi et al.,
2019; Iranmanesh et al., 2017). The TCT model was proposed as an improved model for
information system (IS) continuance behaviour that is appropriate to the complete life cycle of
adoption (Foroughi et al., 2019; Iranmanesh et al., 2017; Gilani et al., 2017). Besides the
application of TCT, this study also extends the model by including habit (Veeramootoo et al.,
2018; Venkatesh et al., 2012) and perceived transparency (Mensah, 2019; Song and Lee, 2016),
given their importance in explaining continuance usage. This study also broadens the body
of knowledge by introducing trust in e-government (Alzahrani et al., 2018) as a driver of
satisfaction and continuance usage intention of e-government services. Prior studies have
already established that many people do not trust online services by the government and
prefer the orthodox face-to-face method (Mensah and Adams, 2019; Alzahrani et al., 2018),
and that residents’ trust in their government has been declining (Mensah, 2019; Alzahrani
et al., 2018). Despite the importance of residents’ trust in the process of adopting
e-government, very few studies have addressed the role of trust in e-government from the
perspective of residents. Understanding the factors influencing e-government continuance
intention from the residents’ standpoint is an important step to fostering resident-centric
e-government services. Moreover, the integration of all the constructs used in this study,
including TCT predictors [perceived ease of use (PEOU), perceived usefulness (PU),
confirmation, satisfaction, attitude], habit, perceived transparency and trust in e-government,
enables researchers to predict and assess the quality of e-government services.
2. Literature review
2.1 Technology continuance theory
The main objective of the research is to investigate the post-adoption behaviour of residents.
The TAM, cognitive model (COGM) and expectation-confirmation model (ECM) are the
most widely applied theories that can elaborate on determinants of continuance intention to
use ISs (Foroughi et al., 2019). The genesis of the TAM came from Davis et al. (1989) after
Fishbein and Ajzen (1977) proposed the theory of reasoned action. In the TAM, PEOU and
PU are regarded as two main external parameters that grab the intention to adopt an IS
(Iranmanesh et al., 2017). According to Joo et al. (2018), one of the limitations of the TAM is
that it fails to capture the post-adoption behaviour of users. Therefore, to enhance the
explanatory powers of TAM, researchers have recommended using it in combination with
other factors.
The ECM was applied chiefly to investigate users’ continuance intention to use a system,
with satisfaction being the most significant driver of users’ continuance intention.
According to Kumar et al. (2018), the ECM was integrated with IS research to develop a new
model for IS continuance usage. According to ECM, confirmation of expectations leads to
JSIT PU and satisfaction, which in turn enhances continuance intention. Contrary to the TAM,
the ECM relies on factors that influence retention and dependability, as it is clear that the
long-term success of any IS is contingent upon post-adoption usage (Wang et al., 2021).
Similarly, Oliver (1980), in their process of developing the COGM, also stated that an
individual’s behaviour could be the result of both attitude and satisfaction.
TCT was suggested as an enhanced and improved model that explains users’ IS
continuance use (Liao et al., 2009). TCT is the combination of three models, i.e. TAM, ECM
and COGM, constituting six main predictors, including PU, PEOU, satisfaction,
confirmation, attitude and continuance intention (Foroughi et al., 2019). The success of the
TCT model can be attributed to the fact that it balances the two main features of attitude
and satisfaction into one continuance model as it attempts to advance the well-developed
constructs of PU and PEOU as first-stage antecedents (Liao et al., 2009). Along with TCT’s
major determinants, namely, PEOU, PU, confirmation, satisfaction and attitude, this study
added to the body of knowledge by combining habit, perceived transparency and trust in e-
government to ascertain citizens’ intention to continue using e-government services. These
variables are included in the current investigation due to their significance in affecting
continued intention usage behaviour. Earlier studies have proven the critical role of TCT in
explaining the greater share of variance associated with IS continuation usage (Foroughi
et al., 2019; Iranmanesh et al., 2017). TCT is also used in this study because of its greater
explanatory ability in explaining post-IS adoption, as illustrated in Figure 1.
Perceived
Transparency
H16
H15 Trust in e-
government
H9 H13
Confirmation Citizens’ H12
Satisfaction
H8 H3 H11
Intention to
Perceived continue use e-
H4 Usefulness H5 government
H10 services
H6 H2
H1
Perceived Ease H14
Citizens’
of Use H7
Attitude
Habit
Figure 1.
Conceptual
framework
Source: Created by authors
Malaysia encompasses public servants, business community, residents and all Technology
administrative branches. There is no doubt that the government of Malaysia will continue to continuance
make endeavours toward betterment to accomplish long-term goals (Shuib et al., 2019).
Thus, it can be posited that e-government is a strong and vivacious part of the public service
theory
delivery system in Malaysia.
With regards to enhancing the understanding of e-government adoption among the
masses, several studies have been conducted (Shuib et al., 2019; Husin et al., 2017). However,
all of these studies have examined the factors which drive Malaysian citizens’ intention to
use e-government services. Thus, the uniqueness of this study is that it strives to discover
factors which are pivotal for the post-adoption process. The findings of such studies will not
only enhance the existing academic knowledge but also bring numerous benefits to society
and the government.
H1. Residents’ attitude positively affects their intention to continue the use of e-
government services.
PU can be illustrated as the perception of individuals regarding the improvement of
performance by using a specific technology (Foroughi et al., 2019). Extant literature on e-
government adoption has empirically proven that both PU and PEOU are the two most
JSIT important elements (Shuib et al., 2019; Mensah, 2019). Similarly, in the same context, several
researchers have also studied the positive effects of PU on residents’ habits and attitudes
and its effects on residents’ satisfaction (Lim et al., 2019; Shuib et al., 2019; Foroughi et al.,
2019). Therefore, residents need to comprehend the e-government system as a useful tool
which can provide benefits in their daily lives. The higher the PU of e-government by
residents, the more likely residents will take the same actions more often. Eventually, and as
a result of simple repetitive behaviours, residents may develop the habit of continued e-
government system usage. Thus, in the light of the above arguments, the following
hypotheses are formulated:
H6. PEOU among residents positively affects their PU towards e-government services.
H7. PEOU among residents positively affects their attitude towards e-government
services.
According to the ECM, user satisfaction is influenced by two elements, i.e. expectation of IS
and the confirmation of expectation after the actual usage. Expectation covers the
foundation, whereas confirmation is assessed by users, who can determine their satisfaction
or evaluative response (Gilani et al., 2017). Confirmation is positively related to satisfaction
with technology use because it implies the realisation of the expected benefits of such use,
whereas disconfirmation suggests a failure to achieve such expectations (Veeramootoo et al.,
2018; Iranmanesh et al., 2017). According to Tsai et al. (2014), confirmation experience can
also change users’ PU. For example, in this context, residents may poorly perceive the
benefits of adopting e-government services. But residents might still be willing to accept it Technology
so that they can enhance their user experience as a foundation for forming more concrete continuance
perceptions. Therefore, users’ PU can be enhanced by confirmation, and disconfirmation
surely is expected to lessen such perceptions, which are parallel to the results of previous
theory
studies (Foroughi et al., 2019). Such confirmation displays that residents obtain their
perceived benefits through their experiences of using the e-government services and
subsequently produce a positive influence on residents’ satisfaction. Thus, based on the
following arguments, the following hypotheses are articulated:
H8. Confirmation of the expectations of residents positively affects their PU towards the
e-government services.
H9. Confirmation of the expectations of residents positively affects their satisfaction
with the e-government services.
User satisfaction denotes a complete assessment of a technology that echoes an emotion-
driven response to the specific technology (Iranmanesh et al., 2017). According to
Bhattacherjee (2001), who narrated that satisfaction is the product of users’ previous
experiences, it influences users’ continued intention to use an IS. Especially in the field of
marketing, a repurchase decision is primarily related to satisfaction (Tran et al., 2019). The
positive relationship between users’ satisfaction and their continued intention has been
explored by several scholars in various fields, such as mobile banking (Foroughi et al., 2019),
electronic filing (Veeramootoo et al., 2018), electronic medical records (Gilani et al., 2017),
mobile shopping (Shang and Wu, 2017), mobile social networking services (Hsu and Lin,
2018) and e-government services (Alzahrani et al., 2018). Similarly, most of the research has
specified that satisfaction and attitude are two distinct constructs, whereas Gilani et al.
(2017) and Foroughi et al. (2019) have considered them identical. Several researchers have
demonstrated the positive and significant relationship between satisfaction and attitude
(Foroughi et al., 2019; Iranmanesh et al., 2018; Iranmanesh et al., 2017). Therefore, based on
the following discussion, the following hypotheses are formed:
4. Methodology
4.1 Measurement of constructs
To test the hypotheses, a cross-sectional survey was applied. The survey items were adapted
from extant published studies to ensure content validity. Scales of PU, confirmation, attitude
and PEOU were taken from Foroughi et al. (2019). The items of satisfaction, continuance
intention and trust in e-government were adapted from Alzahrani et al. (2018). Items of habit
and transparency were adopted from Veeramooto et al. (2018) and Song and Lee (2016),
respectively. The items of marker variable were adopted from Simmering et al. (2015). The
items were measured using a five-point Likert scale anchored by “strongly disagree” and
“strongly agree”. The measurement items for all the studied constructs can be found in Table 2.
The questionnaire instrument used for this study was pretested and piloted to ensure that the
instruments were free of any ambiguity and challenges that may cause expected respondents
to have difficulty in answering the questions. With regard to the pre-test, the instrument was
validated by two academic experts in the IS domain. Furthermore, upon the request of the
experts, the questionnaire was further pilot tested on a small sample of 30 respondents.
Findings of the pilot test revealed that all the studied constructs had achieved satisfactory
reliability, i.e. more than 0.70. Additionally, a statistical test using G*Power determined that
this study required a minimum of 119 respondents.
hypothesised relations in the proposed model. To cater to such issues, Podsakoff et al. (2003)
suggested applying both procedural and statistical remedies to lessen the effects of the CMB
issue. This study not only applied procedural remedies but also applied several statistical
remedies to cater to the said issues, such as applying marker variable (Lindell and Whitney,
2001; Rönkkö and Ylitalo, 2011), inner variance inflation factors (VIF) (Abbasi et al., 2022a,
2021b) and Harman’s single factor test (Podsakoff et al., 2003). The application of the marker
variable yielded that incremental R square change is less than the threshold value by Lindell
and Whitney (2001), i.e. less than 30%. Moreover, findings also revealed that all the inner VIF
values ranged between 1 and 2.322 (Table 4) and are less than 3.3, as suggested by Kock (2015)
and Tariq et al. (2021). Similarly, following the Podsakoff et al. (2003) recommendation to detect
CMB, the Harman single factor test also revealed 36.616% which is less than 50%. Therefore, it
is fair to conclude that this study did not face any CMB issues in the studied data set.
5. Results
5.1 Measurement model
This study measures the inner model [validity and reliability of the constructs, factor
loadings, composite reliability (CR), average variance extracted (AVE) and the Hetrotrait–
Monotrait ratio (HTMT)] as per Hair et al. (2019) instructions. The results of the outer model Technology
can be seen in Table 2. Conferring to the results, factor loadings, CR and AVE are above 0.7, continuance
0.7 and 0.5, respectively (Hair et al., 2019). The result of the measurement model validates
that all the constructs in the study have adequate reliability, and the studied items represent
theory
more than half of the variance for the construct. Therefore, the convergent validity of all the
constructs was established.
Besides convergent validity, the current study also examined the discriminant validity of
the outer model by applying HTMT criteria as suggested by Henseler et al. (2015). As all
HTMT values were lower than 0.85 (Table 3), no issues pertaining to discriminant validity
were found in this study. This further validates that the studied constructs are distinct from
other variables in the study.
Table 2.
evaluation
Measurement model
Outer
Constructs Items Loadings VIF CR AVE Adopted
Confirmation My experience with using MBPP e-government services was better than what I expected 0.908 2.905 0.945 0.852 Foroughi et al. (2019)
The service level provided by MBPP e-government was more than what I expected 0.937 3.805
Overall, most of my expectations from using MBPP e-government were confirmed 0.924 3.067
Perceived usefulness Using MBPP e-government services enables me to access other local agencies more quickly 0.884 3.387 0.945 0.574 Foroughi et al. (2019)
Using MBPP e-government services makes it easier to access other services 0.923 4.335
Using MBPP e-government services would improve the quality of the task I performed 0.908 3.429
I find MBPP e-government services to be useful 0.886 2.834
Perceived ease of use Learning to operate MBPP e-government services is easy for me 0.843 3.493 0.865 0.574 Foroughi et al. (2019)
It is easy to use MBPP e-government services to accomplish the relevant task 0.884 4.181
Interaction with MBPP e-government services does not require a lot of mental effort 0.870 2.547
My interaction with MBPP e-government services is clear and Understandable 0.489 1.224
I find it easy to get MBPP e-government services to do what I what it to do 0.615 1.221
Residents’ satisfaction I feel that MBPP e-government services are adequate in meeting my needs for interaction with the government 0.936 4.013 0.959 0.886 Alzahrani et al.
agency (2018)
MBPP e-government services are effective in fulfilling my needs in respect to interaction with the government 0.961 5.851
agency
Overall, I am satisfied with MBPP e-government services 0.926 3.694
Residents’ attitude Using MBPP e-government services is a good idea 0.648 1.288 0.873 0.701 Foroughi et al. (2019)
Using MBPP e-government services is a beneficial 0.919 2.564
Using Mbpp e-government services is a wise idea 0.915 2.434
Trust in e-government I expect that MBPP e-government services will not take advantage of me 0.864 1.716 0.863 0.679 Alzahrani et al.
I believe that MBPP e-government services will not act in a way that harms me 0.797 1.447 (2018)
I trust MBPP e-government services 0.809 1.570
Habit The use of e-government has become automatic to me 0.906 3.417 0.965 0.872 Veeramootoo et al.
am accustomed to using e- government 0.950 5.629 (2018)
I must use e- government 0.946 5.483
Using e- government has become a necessity 0.933 4.796
Perceived transparency Perceived transparency of MBPP e-government services makes the government and the information more 0.962 3.562 0.961 0.924 Song and Lee (2016)
accessible
Perceived transparency of MBPP e-government services helps residents be more informed about what the 0.960 3.562
government is doing
Continuous intention to use I intend to continue using MBPP e-government services rather than discontinuing to use them 0.937 3.928 0.960 0.852 AlZahrani et al.
MBPP I intend to continue using e-government services rather than use alternative means (e.g. offline interaction with the 0.942 3.952 (2018)
government agency).
I will not discontinue my use of e-government services 0.950 4.728
Note: MBPP = Majlis Bandaraya Pulau Pinang; CR = composite reliability; AVE = average variance extracted; VIF = variance inflated factor
Source: Created by authors
Constructs ATT CINT CNF HABIT PEOU PT PU SAT TIG
Technology
continuance
ATT theory
CINT 0.663
CNF 0.573 0.640
HABIT 0.598 0.481 0.443
PEOU 0.656 0.605 0.651 0.748
PT 0.486 0.508 0.673 0.339 0.552
PU 0.344 0.513 0.624 0.181 0.432 0.650
SAT 0.642 0.501 0.448 0.769 0.676 0.240 0.135
TIG 0.653 0.642 0.720 0.506 0.732 0.746 0.542 0.458
Table 3.
Notes: ATT = attitude; CINT = continuous Intention; CNF = confirmation; HABIT = habit; PEOU =
perceived ease of use; PT = perceived transparency; PU = perceived usefulness; SAT = satisfaction; TIG = Heterotrait–
trust in government monotrait (HTMT)
Source: Created by authors test
IPMA analysis with cumulative values on both vertical and horizontal axis, all the
constructs fall in the category of needing immediate attention starting from the attitude of
residents and their satisfaction with the continuous usage of e-government services, please
see Figure 2.
Figure 2.
IPMA analysis
According to Garson (2016), when a model achieves a value lower than 0.08, it signifies that
the model is acceptable. The findings in Table 5 present the model evaluation in detail. As
per the results of this study, it is clear that the current study model has attained a large GoF
(0.508), and the current study’s SRMR value (0.077) is also less than the threshold value of
0.08. Thus, it can be concluded that the model has a large fit.
In the present study, the GoF value of the final model was computed as follows:
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
GoF ¼ Average AVE * Average R2
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
GoF ¼ 0:768 * 0:331
GoF ¼ 0:508
Confirmation 0.852 –
Perceived usefulness 0.574 0.425
Perceived ease of use 0.574 –
Satisfaction 0.886 0.229
Attitude 0.701 0.404
Trust 0.679 0.392
Habit 0.872 0.029
Perceived transparency 0.924 –
Continuous intention 0.852 0.505
Average 0.768 0.331
Table 5.
Model evaluation Source: Created by authors
6. Discussion Technology
6.1 Summary of results continuance
The foremost objective of this research was to inspect the crucial factors that may hamper or
facilitate the continuous usage of e-government services in Malaysia through the application
theory
of TCT theory. The result of this research reveals that four factors influence residents’
continuous intention to use e-government services in Penang, Malaysia:
(1) satisfaction;
(2) attitude;
(3) trust; and
(4) PU.
This means that if individuals are content, have a favourable attitude, develop trust in and
value the e-government services, they are much more likely to create a continuing intention
to use them in the long term. Additionally, three characteristics have a beneficial effect on
resident satisfaction: confirmation, PU and trust. Likewise, inhabitants will develop a sense
of contentment with services if they perceive them to be beneficial and reliable.
Confirmation, as has been demonstrated in prior research, is critical in determining user
pleasure. This entails achieving the anticipated benefits of using such services. Moreover,
three factors also positively influenced residents’ attitudes:
(1) Satisfaction;
(2) PEOU; and
(3) PU.
These findings imply that in order for citizens to establish a favourable attitude about e-
government services, they must first experience some level of satisfaction with those
services. Having stated that, using e-government services must facilitate users’ performance
or use of such services and be beneficial to them.
Moreover, the impact of perceived transparency was also found to have a significant
effect on residents’ trust in e-government and their perception of its usefulness. These
findings are critical because they confirm the assumption that the more transparent services
are, the more trust a user develops. Additionally, this study adds to the existing body of
knowledge by demonstrating that transparency has a positive and significant effect on PU.
This means that not only would transparency foster user trust, but it will also increase
users’ impression of how beneficial such services are. However, the effect of PEOU on PU
and the effect of habit on residents’ continuous intention to use e-government services were
found to have an insignificant effect and contradict earlier literature (Nisar, 2019;
Veeramootoo et al., 2018). Except for these contradicting and insignificant findings, all other
empirical results are in line with previous literature (Kaya et al., 2020; Nisar, 2019; Shuib
et al., 2019).
Explicitly, the extant literature expresses that e-government was introduced as an
antidote to the rising distrust among residents so as to develop and enhance their trust and
confidence in the workings of government services but has failed to achieve so (Mahmood
et al., 2019; Alzahrani et al., 2018). However, previous literature about the influence of e-
government and issues relating to trust has exhibited conflicting findings (Mahmood et al.,
2019) because all previous studies have focused on the technical aspects in determining the
intention to adopt e-government services and not all relevant factors, such as perceived
transparency and habit, had been included. Therefore, a holistic approach emphasising the
JSIT core functions of government was needed to eradicate such issues about post-adoption-
related issues (Li and Shang, 2020; Waller and Weerakkody, 2016).
6.4 Conclusion
This research was designed to determine the factors influencing the continuance usage
intention of e-government services in the context of Malaysia. In this pursuit, the TCT
was analysed. A major theoretical contribution of TCT is that it combines the two
central constructs of attitude and satisfaction into one continuance model while
retaining the well-established constructs of PEOU and PU as first-level antecedents. In
lieu of the sample studied, this research has established that trust in e-government,
satisfaction, PU and attitude have a significant impact on their continuous intention to
use e-government services. This study also demonstrated that perceived transparency
has a two-fold impact on trust and PU. Overall, unlike previous studies, this study has
tried to elucidate the holistic understanding of residents’ intention to continue the use of
e-government services by validating a model which is grounded in the integration of
several theories.
References
Abbasi, G.A., Jagaveeran, M., Goh, Y.N. and Tariq, B. (2021a), “The impact of type of content use on
smartphone addiction and academic performance: physical activity as moderator”, Technology
in Society, Vol. 64, p. 101521.
Abbasi, G.A., Keong, K.Q.C., Kumar, K.M. and Iranmanesh, M. (2022a), “Asymmetrical modelling to
understand purchase intention towards remanufactured products in the circular economy and a
closed-loop supply chain: an empirical study in Malaysia”, Journal of Cleaner Production,
Vol. 359, p. 132137.
Abbasi, G.A., Sandran, T., Ganesan, Y. and Iranmanesh, M. (2022b), “Go cashless! Determinants of
continuance intention to use E-wallet apps: a hybrid approach using PLS-SEM and fsQCA”,
Technology in Society, Vol. 68, p. 101937.
Abbasi, G.A., Tiew, L.Y., Tang, J., Goh, Y.N. and Thurasamy, R. (2021b), “The adoption of
cryptocurrency as a disruptive force: deep learning-based dual stage structural equation
modelling and artificial neural network analysis”, Plos One, Vol. 16 No. 3, p. e0247582.
Alcaide–Muñoz, L., Rodríguez–Bolívar, M.P., Cobo, M.J. and Herrera–Viedma, E. (2017), “Analysing the Technology
scientific evolution of e-government using a science mapping approach”, Government
Information Quarterly, Vol. 34 No. 3, pp. 545-555.
continuance
Al-Emran, M., AlQudah, A.A., Abbasi, G.A., Al-Sharafi, M.A. and Iranmanesh, M. (2023),
theory
“Determinants of using AI-based chatbots for knowledge sharing: evidence from PLS-SEM and
fuzzy sets (fsQCA)”, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.
Alsharo, M., Alnsour, Y. and Alabdallah, M. (2020), “How habit affects continuous use: evidence from
Jordan’s national health information system”, Informatics for Health and Social Care, Vol. 45
No. 1, pp. 43-56.
Alshibly, H. and Chiong, R. (2015), “Customer empowerment: does it influence electronic government
success? A citizen-centric perspective”, Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, Vol. 14
No. 6, pp. 393-404.
Alzahrani, L., Al-Karaghouli, W. and Weerakkody, V. (2018), “Investigating the impact of citizens’ trust
toward the successful adoption of e-government: a multigroup analysis of gender, age, and
internet experience”, Information Systems Management, Vol. 35 No. 2, pp. 124-146.
Amoroso, D. and Lim, R. (2017), “The mediating effects of habit on continuance intention”,
International Journal of Information Management, Vol. 37 No. 6, pp. 693-702.
Bhattacherjee, A. (2001), “Understanding information systems continuance: an expectation-
confirmation model”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 25 No. 3, pp. 351-370.
Binsawad, M., Abbasi, G.A. and Sohaib, O. (2022), “People’s expectations and experiences of big data
collection in the Saudi context”, PeerJ Computer Science, Vol. 8, p. e926.
Birkinshaw, P. (2006), “Freedom of information and openness: fundamental human rights”,
Administrative Law Review, Vol. 58, p. 177.
Bölen, M.C. (2020), “Exploring the determinants of users’ continuance intention in smartwatches”,
Technology in Society, Vol. 60, p. 101209.
Cohen, J. (1998), Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Science, 2nd ed., Lawrence Erlbaum
Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
Cucciniello, M. and Nasi, G. (2014), “Transparency for trust in government: how effective is
formal transparency?”, International Journal of Public Administration, Vol. 37 No. 13,
pp. 911-921.
Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P. and Warshaw, P.R. (1989), “User acceptance of computer technology: a
comparison of two theoretical models”, Management Science, Vol. 35 No. 8, pp. 982-1003.
Eckman, S. and de Leeuw, E. (2017), “Editorial–special issue on total survey error (TSE)”, Journal of
Official Statistics, Vol. 33 No. 2, pp. 301-301.
Fishbein, M. and Ajzen, I. (1977), “Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: an introduction to theory and
research”, Philosophy and Rhetoric, Vol. 10 No. 2, pp. 177-188.
Fornell, C. and Cha, J. (1994), “Partial least squares”, in Bagozzi, R.P. (Ed.) Advanced Methods of
Marketing Research, Wiley.
Foroughi, B., Iranmanesh, M. and Hyun, S.S. (2019), “Understanding the determinants of mobile
banking continuance usage intention”, Journal of Enterprise Information Management, Vol. 32
No. 6, pp. 1015-1033.
Fuller, C.M., Simmering, M.J., Atinc, G., Atinc, Y. and Babin, B.J. (2016), “Common methods variance
detection in business research”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 69 No. 8, pp. 3192-3198.
Gilani, M., Iranmanesh, M., Nikbin, D. and Zailani, S. (2017), “EMR continuance usage intention
of healthcare professionals”, Informatics for Health and Social Care, Vol. 42 No. 2,
pp. 153-165.
Grimmelikhuijsen, S. and Knies, E. (2017), “Validating a scale for citizen trust in government
organizations”, International Review of Administrative Sciences, Vol. 83 No. 3, pp. 583-601.
JSIT Grimmelikhuijsen, S., Porumbescu, G., Hong, B. and Im, T. (2013), “The effect of transparency on trust
in government: a cross-national comparative experiment”, Public Administration Review, Vol. 73
No. 4, pp. 575-586.
Hair, J.F., Risher, J.J., Sarstedt, M. and Ringle, C.M. (2019), “When to use and how to report the results of
PLS-SEM”, European Business Review, Vol. 31 No. 1, pp. 2-24.
Henseler, J., Ringle, C.M. and Sarstedt, M. (2015), “A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in
variance based structural equation modelling”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,
Vol. 43 No. 1, pp. 115-135.
Hsu, C.L. and Lin, J.C.C. (2018), “Examining social networking O2O apps user loyalty”, Journal of
Computer Information Systems, Vol. 60 No. 5, pp. 459-467.
Husin, M.H., Loghmani, N. and Abidin, S.S.Z. (2017), “Increasing e-government adoption in
Malaysia: MyEG case study”, Journal of Systems and Information Technology, Vol. 19
Nos 3/4, pp. 202-227.
Iranmanesh, M., Moghavvemi, M., Zailani, S. and Hyun, S.S. (2018), “The role of trust and religious
commitment in Islamic medical tourism”, Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, Vol. 23
No. 3, pp. 245-259.
Iranmanesh, M., Min, C.L., Senali, M.G., Nikbin, D. and Foroughi, B. (2022), “Determinants of switching
intention from web-based stores to retail apps: habit as a moderator”, Journal of Retailing and
Consumer Services, Vol. 66, p. 102957.
Iranmanesh, M., Zailani, S. and Nikbin, D. (2017), “RFID continuance usage intention in health care
industry”, Quality Management in Health Care, Vol. 26 No. 2, pp. 116-123.
Joo, Y.J., So, H.J. and Kim, N.H. (2018), “Examination of relationships among students’ self-
determination, technology acceptance, satisfaction, and continuance intention to use K-MOOCs”,
Computers and Education, Vol. 122, pp. 260-272.
Kamaruddin, K. and Noor, N.L. (2017), “From e-government to t-government: a Malaysian citizens’
readiness study”, Journal of Telecommunication, Electronic and Computer Engineering, Vol. 9
Nos 2/9, pp. 15-21.
Kang, J. and Hustvedt, G. (2014), “Building trust between consumers and corporations: the role of
consumer perceptions of transparency and social responsibility”, Journal of Business Ethics,
Vol. 125 No. 2, pp. 253-265.
Kaya, T., Sa gsan, M., Yıldız, M., Medeni, T. and Medeni, T. (2020), “Citizen attitudes towards E-
Government services: comparison of Northern and Southern Nicosia municipalities”, International
Journal of Public Administration in the Digital Age (IJPADA), Vol. 7 No. 1, pp. 17-32.
Kock, N. (2015), “Common method bias in PLS-SEM: a full collinearity assessment approach”,
International Journal of e-Collaboration, Vol. 11 No. 4, pp. 1-10.
Kock, N. and Lynn, G. (2012), “Lateral collinearity and misleading results in variance-based SEM: an
illustration and recommendations”, Journal of the Association for Information Systems, Vol. 13
No. 7, pp. 1-40.
Kumar, R.R., Israel, D. and Malik, G. (2018), “Explaining customer’s continuance intention to use mobile
banking apps with an integrative perspective of ECT and self-determination theory”, Pacific
Asia Journal of the Association for Information Systems, Vol. 10 No. 2, p. 5.
Leong, L.Y., Hew, T.S., Ooi, K.B., Lee, V.H. and Hew, J.J. (2019), “A hybrid SEM-neural network analysis
of social media addiction”, Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 133, pp. 296-316.
Li, Y. and Shang, H. (2020), “Service quality, perceived value, and citizens’ continuous-use intention
regarding e-government: empirical evidence from China”, Information and Management, Vol. 57
No. 3, p. 103197.
Liao, C., Palvia, P. and Chen, J.L. (2009), “Information technology adoption behavior life cycle: toward a
technology continuance theory (TCT)”, International Journal of Information Management,
Vol. 29 No. 4, pp. 309-320.
Lim, S.H., Kim, D.J., Hur, Y. and Park, K. (2019), “An empirical study of the impacts of perceived Technology
security and knowledge on continuous intention to use mobile fintech payment services”,
International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, Vol. 35 No. 10, pp. 886-898.
continuance
Lin, F., Fofanah, S.S. and Liang, D. (2011), “Assessing citizen adoption of e-government initiatives in
theory
Gambia: a validation of the technology acceptance model in information systems success”,
Government Information Quarterly, Vol. 28 No. 2, pp. 271-279.
Lindell, M.K. and Whitney, D.J. (2001), “Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional
research designs”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 86 No. 1, p. 114.
Mahmood, M., Weerakkody, V. and Chen, W. (2019), “The influence of transformed government on
citizen trust: insights from Bahrain”, Information Technology for Development, Vol. 25 No. 2,
pp. 275-303.
Mason, C.H. and Perreault, W.D. (1991), “Collinearity, power, and interpretation of multiple regression
analysis”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 28 No. 3, pp. 268-280.
Mensah, I.K. (2019), “Exploring the moderating effect of perceived usefulness on the adoption of E-
Government services”, International Journal of Electronic Government Research, Vol. 15 No. 1,
pp. 17-35.
Mensah, I.K. and Adams, S. (2019), “A comparative analysis of the impact of political trust on the
adoption of E-Government services”, International Journal of Public Administration, Vol. 43
No. 8, pp. 682-696.
Nabavi, A., Taghavi-Fard, M.T., Hanafizadeh, P. and Taghva, M.R. (2016), “Information technology
continuance intention: a systematic literature review”, International Journal of E-Business
Research, Vol. 12 No. 1, pp. 58-95.
Nikbin, D., Iranmanesh, M., Hyun, S.S., Baharun, R. and Kim, I. (2015), “The role of airline travelers’ pre-
recovery emotions during the service recovery process”, Journal of Travel and Tourism
Marketing, Vol. 32 No. 6, pp. 677-691.
Oghuma, A.P., Libaque-Saenz, C.F., Wong, S.F. and Chang, Y. (2016), “An expectation-confirmation
model of continuance intention to use mobile instant messaging”, Telematics and Informatics,
Vol. 33 No. 1, pp. 34-47.
Oliver, R.L. (1980), “A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions”,
Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 17 No. 4, pp. 460-469.
Oliveira, T., Thomas, M., Baptista, G. and Campos, F. (2016), “Mobile payment: understanding the
determinants of customer adoption and intention to recommend the technology”, Computers in
Human Behavior, Vol. 61, pp. 404-414.
Pappas, I.O. and Woodside, A.G. (2021), “Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA):
guidelines for research practice in information systems and marketing”, International Journal of
Information Management, Vol. 58, p. 102310.
Pengnate, S.F. and Sarathy, R. (2017), “An experimental investigation of the influence of website
emotional design features on trust in unfamiliar online vendors”, Computers in Human
Behavior, Vol. 67, pp. 49-60.
Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Lee, J.Y. and Podsakoff, N.P. (2003), “Common method biases in
behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies”, Journal of
Applied Psychology, Vol. 88 No. 5, p. 879.
Porumbescu, G. (2017), “Linking transparency to trust in government and voice”, The American Review
of Public Administration, Vol. 47 No. 5, pp. 520-537.
Rahi, S., Ghani, M.A. and Ngah, A.H. (2019), “Integration of unified theory of acceptance and use of
technology in internet banking adoption setting: evidence from Pakistan”, Technology in Society,
Vol. 58, p. 101120.
Reichheld, F.F. and Schefter, P. (2000), “E-loyalty: your secret weapon on the web”, Harvard Business
Review, Vol. 78 No. 4, pp. 105-113.
JSIT Ringle, C.M., Wende, S. and Becker, J.-M. (2015), “SmartPLS 3. Boenningstedt: SmartPLS GmbH”,
available at: www.smartpls.com (accessed 22 February 2020).
Rönkkö, M. and Ylitalo, J. (2011), “PLS marker variable approach to diagnosing and controlling for
method variance”, ICIS 2011 Proceedings, Vol. 8.
Senali, M.G., Iranmanesh, M., Ismail, F.N., Rahim, N.F.A., Khoshkam, M. and Mirzaei, M.
(2022), “Determinants of intention to use e-Wallet: personal innovativeness and
propensity to trust as moderators”, International Journal of Human–Computer
Interaction, pp. 1-13.
Seng, W.M., Jackson, S. and Philip, G. (2010), “Cultural issues in developing e-government in Malaysia”,
Behaviour and Information Technology, Vol. 29 No. 4, pp. 423-432.
Shang, D. and Wu, W. (2017), “Understanding mobile shopping consumers’ continuance intention”,
Industrial Management and Data Systems, Vol. 117 No. 1, pp. 213-227.
Shen, Y.C., Huang, C.Y., Chu, C.H. and Hsu, C.T. (2010), “A benefit–cost perspective of the consumer
adoption of the mobile banking system”, Behaviour and Information Technology, Vol. 29 No. 5,
pp. 497-511.
Shieh, G. (2010), “On the misconception of multicollinearity in detection of moderating effects:
multicollinearity is not always detrimental”, Multivariate Behavioral Research, Vol. 45 No. 3,
pp. 483-507.
Shuib, L., Yadegaridehkordi, E., Ainin, S. and Feng, G.C. (2019), “Malaysian urban poor adoption of
e-government applications and their satisfaction”, Cogent Social Sciences, Vol. 5 No. 1,
p. 1565293.
Simmering, M.J., Fuller, C.M., Richardson, H.A., Ocal, Y. and Atinc, G.M. (2015), “Marker variable
choice, reporting, and interpretation in the detection of common method variance: a review and
demonstration”, Organizational Research Methods, Vol. 18 No. 3, pp. 473-511.
Song, C. and Lee, J. (2016), “Citizens’ use of social media in government, perceived transparency, and
trust in government”, Public Performance and Management Review, Vol. 39 No. 2,
pp. 430-453.
Talukder, M.S., Chiong, R., Corbitt, B. and Bao, Y. (2020), “Critical factors influencing the intention to
adopt M-government services by the elderly”, Journal of Global Information Management,
Vol. 28 No. 4, pp. 74-94.
Talukder, S., Chiong, R., Dhakal, S., Sorwar, G. and Bao, Y. (2019), “A two-stage structural equation
modeling-neural network approach for understanding and predicting the determinants of
m-government service adoption”, Journal of Systems and Information Technology, Vol. 21 No. 4,
pp. 419-438.
Tariq, B., Najam, H., Han, H., Sadaa, A.M., Abbasi, A.A., Christopher, N. and Abbasi, G.A. (2021),
“Examining mobile financial services in Pakistan: rural and urban perspective with gender as a
moderator”, Recent Advances in Technology Acceptance Models and Theories, Vol. 335, pp. 225-245.
Teo, T.S., Srivastava, S.C. and Jiang, L. (2008), “Trust and electronic government success: an empirical
study”, Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 25 No. 3, pp. 99-132.
Thusi, P. and Maduku, D.K. (2020), “South african millennials’ acceptance and use of retail mobile
banking apps: an integrated perspective”, Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 111, p. 106405.
Tran, L.T.T., Pham, L.M.T. and Le, L.T. (2019), “E-satisfaction and continuance intention: the moderator
role of online ratings”, International Journal of Hospitality Management, Vol. 77, pp. 311-322.
Tsai, H.T., Chien, J.L. and Tsai, M.T. (2014), “The influences of system usability and user satisfaction
on continued internet banking services usage intention: empirical evidence from Taiwan”,
Electronic Commerce Research, Vol. 14 No. 2, pp. 137-169.
Veeramootoo, N., Nunkoo, R. and Dwivedi, Y.K. (2018), “What determines success of an e-government
service? Validation of an integrative model of e-filing continuance usage”, Government
Information Quarterly, Vol. 35 No. 2, pp. 161-174.
Venkatesh, V. (2006), “Where to go from here? Thoughts on future directions for research on individual- Technology
level technology adoption with a focus on decision making”, Decision Sciences, Vol. 37 No. 4,
pp. 497-518. continuance
Venkatesh, V., Thong, J.Y.L. and Xu, X. (2012), “Consumer acceptance and use of information theory
technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology”, MIS Quarterly,
Vol. 36 No. 1, pp. 157-178.
Waller, P. and Weerakkody, V. (2016), Digital Government: Overcoming the Systemic Failure of
Transformation, Brunel University, London.
Wang, T., Lin, C.L. and Su, Y.S. (2021), “Continuance intention of university students and online
learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: a modified expectation confirmation model
perspective”, Sustainability, Vol. 13 No. 8, p. 4586.
Zhao, F., Wallis, J. and Singh, M. (2015), “E-government development and the digital economy: a
reciprocal relationship”, Internet Research, Vol. 25 No. 5, pp. 734-766.
Further reading
Carlson, J. and O’Cass, A. (2010), “Exploring the relationships between e-service quality, satisfaction,
attitudes and behaviours in content-driven e-service web sites”, Journal of Services Marketing,
Vol. 24 No. 2, pp. 112-127.
Zhou, T. and Li, H. (2014), “Understanding mobile SNS continuance usage in China from the
perspectives of social influence and privacy concern”, Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 37,
pp. 283-289.
Corresponding author
Ghazanfar Abbasi can be contacted at: [email protected]
For instructions on how to order reprints of this article, please visit our website:
www.emeraldgrouppublishing.com/licensing/reprints.htm
Or contact us for further details: [email protected]