Anneure 4

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 4

Amrutvahini Polytechnic, Sangamner

Computer Technology Department


Annexure –III & IV (Rubrics & Micro Project Evaluation Sheet)
Name of Student: Kolhe kajal Rajendra Enrollment No: 2100800283
Name of Program: CM Semester: fifth
Course Title: Client side scripting language Code: 22519
Title of Micro Project: Movie Ticket Booking
Course Outcomes:Use3 different program flow control structure for design interactive web pages
Exceute3 programs on Arrays and functions in Java script.
Implement3 event based web forms and handling cookies using Java script.
Apply3 regular expressions for validations to design interactive webpages.
Implement3 Menus and navigations in web Pages.
Indicators for different levels of performance evaluation scale (1 to 2)
Criteria A) Process & Product Assessment (Performance in Group Activity Out of 6)
Poor (1) Marks Average (1.5) Marks Good (2) Marks
At least two
Literature No reference is used At least one reference
references website
review / only taken material website or book is referred
or book are referred
Information from Google and copy to collect literature or
to collect literature or
collection pasted information
information
a) Incomplete a) Well assembled /
a) Just assembled /
a) Quality fabrication / assembly / fabricated with
fabricated, not in proper
of prototype/ survey proper shape
shape, dimensions /
model / chart / a) Most of the content dimensions / well
average survey
drawing is non-relevant. Report defined survey
b) Most of the portion in b) Everything in the
b) Quality / drawing is not
project report irrelevant
of formatted as per project report is
and is formatted but some
project report instructions. formatted as per
of the portion is remaining the instructions
(for study
to format.
project) given.
No previous review and No previous review but Reviewed &
Timely submission after the submission on or before submission on or
submission. given date. given date. before given date.
Indicators for different levels of performance evaluation scale (1 to 2)
Criteria B) Individual Presentation/Viva (Out of 4)
Poor (1) Marks Average (1.5) Marks Good (2) Marks
Major information is Included major Well organized,
Presentation of
not included, information but not well included major
the micro information is not well organized and not information, well
project organized presented well presented
Answer to Could not reply to
sample considerable number Replied to considerable Replied most of the
questions of question. number of questions but questions properly.
(Oral) not very properly.

(A) (B)
Process & Product Assessment (06) Individual Presentation/Viva (04) Total Mark s (10)

Comments/ Suggestions about team work/leadership/Inter-personal communication (if Any) Name


& Designation of the Teacher:
Dated Signature:
Amrutvahini Polytechnic, Sangamner
Computer Technology Department
Annexure –III & IV (Rubrics & Micro Project Evaluation Sheet)
Name of Student: Naik Vaishnavi Raju Enrollment No: 2100800284
Name of Program: CM Semester: fifth
Course Title: Client side scripting language Code: 22519
Title of Micro Project: Movie Ticket Booking
Course Outcomes:Use3 different program flow control structure for design interactive web pages
Exceute3 programs on Arrays and functions in Java script.
Implement3 event based web forms and handling cookies using Java script.
Apply3 regular expressions for validations to design interactive webpages.
Implement3 Menus and navigations in web Pages.
Indicators for different levels of performance evaluation scale (1 to 2)
Criteria A) Process & Product Assessment (Performance in Group Activity Out of 6)
Poor (1) Marks Average (1.5) Marks Good (2) Marks
At least two
Literature No reference is used At least one reference
references website
review / only taken material website or book is referred
or book are referred
Information from Google and copy to collect literature or
to collect literature or
collection pasted information
information
a) Incomplete c) Well assembled /
c) Just assembled /
c) Quality fabrication / assembly / fabricated with
fabricated, not in proper
of prototype/ survey proper shape
shape, dimensions /
model / chart / a) Most of the content dimensions / well
average survey
drawing is non-relevant. Report defined survey
d) Most of the portion in d) Everything in the
d) Quality / drawing is not
project report irrelevant
of formatted as per project report is
and is formatted but some
project report instructions. formatted as per
of the portion is remaining the instructions
(for study
to format.
project) given.
No previous review and No previous review but Reviewed &
Timely submission after the submission on or before submission on or
submission. given date. given date. before given date.
Indicators for different levels of performance evaluation scale (1 to 2)
Criteria B) Individual Presentation/Viva (Out of 4)
Poor (1) Marks Average (1.5) Marks Good (2) Marks
Major information is Included major Well organized,
Presentation of
not included, information but not well included major
the micro information is not well organized and not information, well
project organized presented well presented
Answer to Could not reply to
sample considerable number Replied to considerable Replied most of the
questions of question. number of questions but questions properly.
(Oral) not very properly.

(A) (B)
Process & Product Assessment (06) Individual Presentation/Viva (04) Total Mark s (10)

Comments/ Suggestions about team work/leadership/Inter-personal communication (if Any) Name


& Designation of the Teacher:
Dated Signature:
Amrutvahini Polytechnic, Sangamner
Computer Technology Department
Annexure –III & IV (Rubrics & Micro Project Evaluation Sheet)
Name of Student: Kawade Ratuja Dipak Enrollment No: 2100800509
Name of Program: CM Semester: fifth
Course Title: Client side scripting language Code: 22519
Title of Micro Project: Movie Ticket Booking
Course Outcomes:Use3 different program flow control structure for design interactive web pages
Exceute3 programs on Arrays and functions in Java script.
Implement3 event based web forms and handling cookies using Java script.
Apply3 regular expressions for validations to design interactive webpages.
Implement3 Menus and navigations in web Pages.
Indicators for different levels of performance evaluation scale (1 to 2)
Criteria A) Process & Product Assessment (Performance in Group Activity Out of 6)
Poor (1) Marks Average (1.5) Marks Good (2) Marks
At least two
Literature No reference is used At least one reference
references website
review / only taken material website or book is referred
or book are referred
Information from Google and copy to collect literature or
to collect literature or
collection pasted information
information
a) Incomplete e) Well assembled /
e) Just assembled /
e) Quality fabrication / assembly / fabricated with
fabricated, not in proper
of prototype/ survey proper shape
shape, dimensions /
model / chart / a) Most of the content dimensions / well
average survey
drawing is non-relevant. Report defined survey
f) Most of the portion in f) Everything in the
f) Quality / drawing is not
project report irrelevant
of formatted as per project report is
and is formatted but some
project report instructions. formatted as per
of the portion is remaining the instructions
(for study
to format.
project) given.
No previous review and No previous review but Reviewed &
Timely submission after the submission on or before submission on or
submission. given date. given date. before given date.
Indicators for different levels of performance evaluation scale (1 to 2)
Criteria B) Individual Presentation/Viva (Out of 4)
Poor (1) Marks Average (1.5) Marks Good (2) Marks
Major information is Included major Well organized,
Presentation of
not included, information but not well included major
the micro information is not well organized and not information, well
project organized presented well presented
Answer to Could not reply to
sample considerable number Replied to considerable Replied most of the
questions of question. number of questions but questions properly.
(Oral) not very properly.

(A) (B)
Process & Product Assessment (06) Individual Presentation/Viva (04) Total Mark s (10)

Comments/ Suggestions about team work/leadership/Inter-personal communication (if Any) Name


& Designation of the Teacher:
Dated Signature:

You might also like