Sathyamoorthy Vs Reliance
Sathyamoorthy Vs Reliance
Sathyamoorthy Vs Reliance
1 of 2024
DATED: 08.01.2024
CORAM
C.M.A.No.1 of 2024
1.Gomathi
2.Minor Rithika,
Rep by mother/1st appellant.
3.Perumayee
...Appellant
Vs
1.Sathiyamoorthy
2.M/s.Reliance General Insurance Co Ltd.,
Having Office at Shri Lakshmi Complex,
1st Floor, Omalur Main Road,
Swarnapuri, Salem 636 004.
... Respondents
Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor
Vehicles Act, 1988, to enhance the compensation amount made in judgement
and decree dated 13.02.2023 made in MCOP.No.1321 of 2021 on the file of the
Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Special District Judge, Salem.
1/8
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.M.A.No.1 of 2024
JUDGMENT
This civil miscellaneous appeal has been filed challenging the quantum of
2. The learned counsel for the claimant would submit that on 05.09.2021,
0069 near Ashok Nagar Beach Road, another two-wheeler bearing Registration
No.TN 52 M 3027 came in a rash and negligent manner and dashed against the
said Yuvaraj. Due to the said accident, he died on the spot. Considering all the
aspects, the Tribunal had awarded the compensation in the following manner:
2/8
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.M.A.No.1 of 2024
3. The learned counsel for the appellant would submit that the Tribunal
had fixed the notional income of the deceased as a sum of Rs.8,000/-, which is
awarded under the head loss of income by considering the notional income as a
sum of Rs.14,000/-. Hence, he requests this Court to re-consider the said aspect.
request this Court to pass appropriate orders after considering the facts and
5. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and the respondent and also
6. In the present case, it appears that at the time of accident, the deceased,
who was aged about 33 years, was working as a dying master. Hence,
considering the year of accident, age and nature of employment of the deceased,
deceased. Thus, the future prospects of 40% has to be added to the notional
3/8
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.M.A.No.1 of 2024
income of the deceased i.e., Rs.15,000/-, and the same has to be calculated as
follows:
manner:
10. Further, since the compensation awarded by the Tribunal under the
head loss of love and affection for the wife, mother and daughter of the deceased
for a sum of Rs.60,000/- is on lower side, this Court is inclined to award a sum
compensation for wife, which was awarded under the head loss of consortium,
stands confirmed.
11. The Tribunal had also awarded a sum of Rs.25,000/- towards the
funeral expenses, which is on higher side. Hence, the said amount is reduced to
a sum of Rs.15,000/-. Further, since no amount was awarded under the head
4/8
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.M.A.No.1 of 2024
as follows:
Tribunal stands confirmed. It is also made clear that the compensation will be
5/8
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.M.A.No.1 of 2024
14. In the result, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is partly allowed and the
Rs.28,48,000/- along with interest and costs, less the amount already deposited,
if any, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this
District Curt, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Salem. Upon such deposit, the
deposited in any one of the Nationalised Bank till she attains majority and the 1st
appellant being the mother of the minor is permitted to withdraw the accrued
interest once in three months for the welfare of the minor. Further, the Tribunal
is directed to transfer the share of the 1st and 3rd appellants to their respective
RTGS, within a period of three weeks from the deposit or from the date of
receipt of the Bank details obtained for the claimant or application for
6/8
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.M.A.No.1 of 2024
08.01.2024
Index: Yes/No
Internet:Yes/No
Speaking order/Non-speaking order
nsa
To:
7/8
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.M.A.No.1 of 2024
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY,J.
nsa
C.M.A.No.1 of 2024
08.01.2024
8/8
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis