2022-2023

CIVIL SOCIETY AND PUBLIC GRIEVANCES

CORRUPTION IN INDIA: A VIOLATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS PROMOTING TRANSPARENCY AND

SUBMITTED TO: SUBMITTED BY:

Dr. RK Yadav Mohd Ashad

Associate Professor (Law) Semester VIII

Dr. RML National Law University Roll No. -94

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ...........................................................................................................3

INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................4

CRITICAL EXAMINATION OF THE LOKPAL ACT...............................................................4

A. Selection Process of the Lokpal and Its Members..............................................................5

B. Lokpal's Power to Investigate Corruption..........................................................................6

THE WAY FORWARD: A COHESIVE APPROACH TO COMBATING CORRUPTION ........7

A. Laws.................................................................................................................................7

B. Institutions ........................................................................................................................7

C. Judiciary ...........................................................................................................................8

D. Judicial Governance .........................................................................................................9

E. Role of the Media .............................................................................................................9

F. Role of Civil Society ...................................................................................................... 10

G. Creating Increased Citizen Awareness ............................................................................ 10

CONCLUSION ......................................................................................................................... 11
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

“The only thing that overcomes hard luck is hard work.”

Writing a project on any topic is never a single man’s job. I am overwhelmed in all humbleness
and gratefulness to acknowledge my depth to all those who have helped me to put these ideas, well
above the level of simplicity and into something concrete.

I am very thankful to my professor, Dr. R.K. Yadav, for his valuable help. He was always there
to show me the right track when I needed his help. With the help of his valuable suggestions,
guidance and encouragement, I was able to complete this project. I would also like to thank my
friends, who often helped and gave me support at critical junctures during the making to this
project.

I hope you will appreciate the hard work that I have put in this project work.
 INTRODUCTION

Corruption in India is a problem that has serious implications for both protecting the rule of law
and ensuring access to justice. Corruption is pervasive in the system of governance in India,
undermining the effectiveness of all institutions of governance. Since independence, successive
governments have attempted to take numerous measures to reduce the levels of corruption in the
country, including legislative and institutional measures. However, absence of the political will
and sincerity in taking concrete steps to eliminate corruption has resulted in most of these measures
not achieving the results that were intended. Corruption in India is not merely a law enforcement
issue where the existing laws of the state are violated and can be remedied merelyby more
stringent law enforcement. Rather, corruption in India is a much more fundamental problem that
undermines the very social fabric, and political and bureaucratic structure of the Indian society.
Thus, while it is necessary for the law enforcement machinery to be empowered, the larger issue
concerning corruption in India is how it violates the human rights - and, in particular the
constitutional rights - guaranteed under the Constitution of India. Further, corruption in India
violates the constitutional foundations of Indian democracy, on the basis of which a rule of law
society in India was meant to be established. However, the promises made bythe writers of the
Indian Constitution have been broken over the years by a scourge of corruption in every institution,
which has led to a blot in the governance apparatus from top to bottom.

CRITICAL EXAMINATION OF THE LOKPAL ACT

The Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act 2013131 was passed in response to deafening demands for a legal
framework committed to identify and address corruption. Birthed in a widespread movement
which engaged both civil society and socio-political stakeholders, the institutions of the Lokpal
and Lokayukta were supposed to be institutions of the highest integrity that would provide
effective structural mechanisms to tackle corruption at every level of government. Unfortunately,
the shape that the final Act took was inadequate in ensuring that the Lokpal and Lokayukta could
realize their intended status as the defenders of democracy and accountability1

1
Jon S. T. Quah, Corruption in Asian Countries: Can It Be Minimized?, 59 PUB. ADMIN. REv. 483,483-94 (1999).
in the Indian state. Two critical issues that have not been adequately addressed and prevent the
Act from having any meaningful impact2 in the fight against corruption must be understood.

A. Selection Process of the Lokpal and Its Members

The most important aspect of any institution to be effective is the process of selecting its
members, which constitutes the institution. This assumes significance in light of the fact
that social expectations have been generated by the civil society movement leading to a
higher level of citizens' consciousness in the fight against corruption. If Lokpal is to be
effective, it needs to be independent from the government. The Act in its final form failed
to adequately address the question of independence of the institution in relation to the
selection of its members.
A mere representation of the leader of opposition in the Selection Committee may not be
sufficient to ensure independence of the institution. The Act requires half of its eight
members to have some prior judicial experience while the other half will be someone who
meets the criteria of "a person of impeccable integrity and outstanding ability having special
knowledge and expertise of not less than twenty-five years in the matters relating to anti-
corruption policy, public administration, vigilance, finance including insurance and
banking, law and management." The process of selection is vested with a Selection
Committee that is chaired by the Prime Minister along with the Speaker of the Lok Sabha,
the Chief Justice of India, or another Judge of the Supreme Court appointed by him and an
"eminent jurist." Though conceptually there is room for a person who doesnot have a
background in public service to sit on the committee, the Lokpal remains an institution
comprised of persons who have exercised some form of public power, andwho therefore
represent the class of people under the Lokpal's scrutiny.
For greater efficiency in the fight against corruption, and a large part of that fight will
inevitably be in relation to the persons who exercise public power, then the Selection
Committee should have persons who do not necessarily exercise such power. It is in this
context that greater involvement of members from the civil society, media, and academia

2
C. RAJ KUMAR, CORRUPTION IN HUMAN RIGHTS IN INDIA 171-88 (2011) [hereinafter CORRUPTION
IN HUMAN RIGHTS].
 in the Selection Committee is critical3 for maintaining the legitimacy and credibility of
the anti-corruption institution.

B. Lokpal's Power to Investigate Corruption

The Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act is ostensibly an institution to fight corruption. However,
for this institution to be effective in the fight against corruption, it has to be significantly
empowered, otherwise we run the risk of creating one more institution, which not only will
fail but also will hugely give us a setback in our larger effort to create transparency and
accountability in governance4. Despite the fact that the Act was passed in 2014, the
concerned bodies under the Act are yet to be constituted, and complaints for the forumare
left in limbo.5
The Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act as finally enacted as an independent institution to fight
against corruption is dependent upon the CBI or the CVC for fulfilling its statutory
obligations to fight corruption especially at the stage of preliminary investigation. This is
a fundamental flaw in the design of the Lokpal. Experience has demonstrated that political
parties have misused the police and investigative agencies. A number of independent
commissions have come to the same conclusion that we need to provide greater
independence to the institutions that are involved in the fight against corruption. The Act
specifies that the Lokpal will have supervision over any investigative agency discharging
investigative functions under the Act, which in most instances would be the CBI or the
CVC. This essentially means that the Lokpal and Lokayukta become an additional master
to an institution which is under great scrutiny for its structural incoherence.

3
Moshe Maor, Feeling the Heat? Anticorruption Mechanisms in Comparative Perspective, 17 GOVERNANCE 1, 1-
28 (2004).
4
Chris Wheeler, Drafting and Implementing Whistleblower Protection Laws, in CONTROLLING CORRUPTION
IN ASIA AND THE PACIFIC 127, 127-45 (Asian Development Bank 2004), available at
http://www.oecd.org/site/adboecdanti-corruptioninitiative/ regionalseminars/35137772.pdf.
5
A.G. Noorani, Commissions of Inquiry, in CORRUPTION IN INDIA: AGENDA FOR ACTION 218, 221 (S.
Guhan & Samuel Paul eds., 1997).
THE WAY FORWARD: A COHESIVE APPROACH TO COMBATING CORRUPTION

The empire of corruption has done seminal damage to good governance and the rule of law in
India. 135 This has resulted in human rights violations that have led to a lack of access to justice.
Corruption is discriminatory, contagious, an assault on the human rights of people, and should be
regarded as more than merely a criminal offense. It hinders the process of achieving access to
justice and undermines the efforts to ensure human development. 36 We need to view corruption
from the perspective of access to justice and human rights so that public institutions can be held
accountable for abuse of power. We must encourage institutions like the National Human Rights
Commission and State Human Rights Commissions in India to begin taking cognizance of
corruption cases to raise the profile of this linkage with human rights. We must also develop a new
language, including the right to corruption-free governance as a fundamental and non- derogable
human right so that the ideal of constitutional governance is implemented. 137 There are various
ways for the judiciary to eliminate corruption even as the legislative and executive branches
dawdle and dissemble. 138 Corruption within the judiciary, mainly at the lower levels, ought to
be a target for elimination. 39 Anti-corruption work must involve grassroots civilsociety
organizations.

A. Laws

The legal framework for fighting corruption needs to be strengthened as a facet of both
legal and judicial reforms. The existing legislative framework for fighting corruption in
India needs to be thoroughly examined. Efforts ought to be taken to ensure that the laws,
rules and regulations for fighting corruption are in place. 147 But it is important to note
that anti-corruption laws will not be effective if the law enforcement machinery and the
rule of law culture in a society is weak.148 Hence, there is a need for taking efforts to
protect the rule of law and empower the law enforcement machinery, including the police,
prosecution and other agencies that may be involved in the fight against corruption.6

B. Institutions

6
Krishna K. Tummala, Corruption in India: Control Measures and Consequences, 10 ASIANJ. POL. Sci. 43, 51
(2002).
 The legal framework for fighting corruption should be supplemented by establishing and
empowering institutions. A number of institutions are involved in varying capacities in
the fight against corruption. Since corruption is inextricably connected to creating obstacles
to access to justice and a lack of effective development policies, appropriate institutions
should be in place to deal with it.150 The judiciary and human rights commissions are best
suited to deal with corruption as a violation of human rights that inhibits access to justice.'
5 ' But the consequences of corruption on development are profound. It is here that anti-
corruption machinery needs to be strengthened and the need for independent commissions
against corruption becomes necessary. 152 Independent anti-corruption institutions, like
the ICAC proposed in this article, have the potential to act as the watchdog for ensuring
that corruption does not become a hindrance to development and the resources of the state
are distributed in a fair and equitable manner.
7

C. Judiciary

The judiciary is uniquely placed in the matrix of power structures within the system of
governance. Judges are not elected but clearly have the power and indeed the responsibility
to check the exercise of powers and actions of elected representatives and appointed
officials. The judiciary as an institution is vastly respected, notwithstanding huge
challenges in ensuring access to justice, judicial process and issues of transparency and
accountability. 164 It is vested with ensuring that the rights and freedoms of the people are
protected and the powers exercised by the government in adopting policies are in
accordance with the Constitution and other legislations. 165 In theory, if the different
branches of the government adhere to the basic principle of separation of powers and
function within their limits, it is considered a sound system of governance. In practice,
however, a number of issues have emerged and challenges occurred.8 It is in this context
that the three branches of the government - the legislature, the executive, and the

7
Daniel R. Fung, Anti-Corruption and Human Rights Protection: Hong Kong's Jurisprudential Experience, Address
to the 8th International Anti-Corruption Conference (Sept. 9, 1997), available at http://8iacc.org/papers/fung.html.
8
Thomas Chan, Corruption Prevention - The Hong Kong Experience, UNAFEI REs. MATERIAL SERIES No. 56,
at 365 (2000), available at http://www.unafei.or.jp/ english/pdf/PDF rms/no56/56-26.pdf.
 judiciary - need to have a certain degree of trust in, and deference to, the actions of one
another in matters within their respective jurisdictions.
When acts of corruption are brought for adjudication to the judiciary, it is important for the
judiciary as an institution to take all legislative and constitutionally available mechanisms
for upholding the right to corruption-free governance. The credibility of the judiciary as an
institution needs to be effectively used notwithstanding the fact that there have been recent
issues of corruption within the judiciary that have undermined itsreputation.

D. Judicial Governance

The term "judicial governance" in itself is subject to challenge as the judiciary is not
supposed to be involved in "governance". However, the effort of the Indian judiciary to
infuse accountability in the functioning of government institutions, and the growth and
development of human rights jurisprudence, has demonstrated the central importance of
judicial governance. 168 This has posed critical challenges to parliamentary accountability
and executive powers and, more importantly, reinforced the need for improving efficiency
and effectiveness of governmental institutions.9

E. Role of the Media

The role of media in the fight against corruption is critical. Worldwide, the media has
played an important role in bringing to the public domain the instances of violations of
access to justice. The media has played a dominant role in raising issues of development
and how corruption has contributed to it. This role needs to be further improved and the
media needs to take more responsible steps to act as a custodian of India's democracy and
rule of law. There is a need for promoting the role of media as the availability and
dissemination of information becomes complex. In many cases, there is a need forexperts
in different fields to understand the nature of investments made and the financial
transactions involved in allegations of corruption.' 8 ' The media has the necessary human
and other resources to seek this information, analyze it and make it available for the

9
Daniel R. Fung, Anti-Corruption and Human Rights Protection: Hong Kong's Jurisprudential Experience, Address
to the 8th International Anti-Corruption Conference (Sept. 9, 1997), available at http://8iacc.org/papers/fung.html.
 public to understand. This role of media is critical for raising awareness and contributing
to the empowerment of the wider civil society.10

F. Role of Civil Society

The role of civil society is central to the fight against corruption. Corruption and the lack
of access to justice are symptomatic of a larger problem within societies.'8 3 The only way
to reduce corruption and provide for mechanisms that create greater access to justice is to
empower the civil society.'8 4 The role of domestic and international civil society is
important as it is best placed to situate the problem of corruption from an access to justice
standpoint. 85 Once recognized in this manner, the strategies that may be adopted for
fighting corruption may include a variety of democratic measures that will put pressure on
governments to deal with the problem of corruption.

G. Creating Increased Citizen Awareness

Creating increased awareness among citizens about corruption and its effects is another
important element in combating corruption - particularly when this group awareness is
accompanied by the public's ability to act as a group against corruption. 11 The need for
creating awareness through a wide range of mechanisms is critical for fighting corruption.
The awareness should be focused on all aspects of the problem of corruption including its
causes and consequences, and the government's efforts to eliminate corruption and
information relating to the institutional mechanisms that are put in place in investigating
allegations of corruption. The purpose of the awareness should be both to inform and to
empower citizenry.

10
C. Raj Kumar, Corruption and Human Rights: Promoting Transparency in Governance and the Fundamental Right
to CorruptionFree Service in India, 17 Colum. J. Asian L. 31, 63-65 (2003)
11
Olga Tellis v. Bombay Municipal Council, (1985) 3 S.C.C. 545 (India)
 CONCLUSION

The fight against corruption has been declared a high priority by Prime Minister ManMohan Singh.
However, corruption remains widespread in the country and there have been manyinstances of
political and bureaucratic corruption, public funds embezzlement, fraudulent procurement
practices, and judicial corruption. High ranking officials have also been involved in major
corruption scandals. The sectors most affected by corruption include public procurement, tax and
customs administration, infrastructure, public utilities, and the police. The latter has been identified
as one of the most corrupt institutions by various surveys. The Government has put in place a well
developed legal and institutional framework, with institutions including the Central Bureau of
Investigation, the Office of the Comptroller and the Auditor General, and the Central Vigilance
Commission.12 The Supreme Court, in particular, has taken a firm stance against corruption in
recent years and made several important rulings. Another achievement in the fight against
corruption has been the enactment of the Right to Information (RTI) Act in 2005, which grants
citizens access to government information and a mechanism to control public spending. In spite of
progress, however, law enforcement remains weak and reforms have a long way to go.

12
A.S. Anand, Public Interest Litigation as Aid to Protection of Human Rights, (2001) 7 S.C.C. (J) 1 (India),
available at http://www.ebc-india.com/lawyer/articles/ 2001v7al.htm.