ROCE Analysis Final Draft
ROCE Analysis Final Draft
ROCE Analysis Final Draft
The intent of this report is to study and analyse the financial statements of two companies to assess profitability
and solvency from an investor’s perspective. The companies selected are Diageo PLC and Britvic PLC. Both
companies are publicly listed but they operate in different industries. Diageo is a leading British manufacturer of
alcoholic beverages while Britvic operates in the soft drinks industry. Both total beverage alcohol (TBA) and soft
drinks are a part of consumer goods industry, however, they present unique challenges of their own. This is
reflected in the capital structure and the operating structure of the businesses. The focus of this report is to analyse
the return on common equity as a function of leverage that arises in financing activities and leverage that arises in
operations. Analysis of past and current financial statements, trend and comparative analysis, economic and
statistical considerations are made to reach the conclusion.
Founded in 1845 in the Essex County, the company started producing fruit juices under the name, British Vitamin
Products Company. Subsequently, the company rebranded and manufactures, markets and sells branded still and
carbonated soft drinks under its current name, Britvic. Since its inception 179 years ago, the company has
witnessed numerous acquisitions and mergers, like the acquisitions of brands- Tango & Corona from Beechams in
1987. Today, majority of the company’s operations are concentrated in the UK and Ireland with operations in over
100 countries globally. Additionally, the company has an exclusive 20 year franchise bottling agreement with the
American giant, PepsiCo for the production, distribution and marketing of its brands in the UK. This agreement
gives them exclusive access to brands such as Pepsi MAX, 7UP, Mountain Dew, Lipton Iced Tea and Rockstar Energy.
Its portfolio of in-house brands includes Robinsons, Tango, J2O, Fruit Shoot, Teisseire, Maguary, Dafruta, Bela Ischia,
Ballygowan, etc. Britivic’s major global competitors include The Coca-Cola Company, PepsiCo, Nichols, Refresco,
Primo Water, Sumol+Compal, etc.
The comparison between the two companies reveals that Diageo’s RNOA is driven by higher after-tax OPM while
Britvic’s by higher ATO. This is explained by the respective industries the two companies operate in. The alcoholic
beverage industry (Diageo PLC) is relatively more capital-intensive than the soft drinks industry (Britvic PLC),
resulting in a lower ATO. Diageo’s asset turnover in FY22 is 0.7288, which indicates that for every £1 of net
operating assets, the company has generated £0.7288 in sales. The low efficiency is justified by the company’s
relatively conservative business approach post the pandemic. Additionally, the company’s North American arm of
the business was diversely affected by the acute shortage in aluminium can market. Furthermore, Diageo greater
global footprint implies higher number of manufacturing units globally. The soft drinks industry on the other hand
has much lower margins in comparison to alcoholic beverages, resulting in overall lower profitability margins.
Britvic’s RNOA for the period FY2020 to FY2022 indicates that it is generating greater returns from its operating
assets. The company has managed to do so by increasing both factors, after-tax operating profit margin and asset
turnover that drive the RNOA. The firm also managed to decrease its financial leverage year over year. FY2022 saw
a substantial increase in the firm’s RNOA which in turn positively impacted the operating spread too. This is despite
their increasing net borrowing costs.
A comparative analysis of the two companies shows a positive financial leverage and a favourable operating spread.
This is indicative of both companies’ ability to earn more from their operating assets than their after-tax borrowing
costs. Finally, Diageo’s overall higher ROCE in comparison to Britvic’s is also justified by its revenue and scale of
operations. Diageo, being a much bigger company in scale and value, is in a better position to grant or extend credit
terms, thereby reducing the investment shareholders put in the business.
CONCLUSION
In a market filled with volatility and uncertainty, the soft drinks and alcoholic beverages categories continue to
shine, outperforming the broader consumer goods sector. Despite the challenges their respective industries faced
since the pandemic, both companies continued to show increased demand. While Diageo's CAGR is between 4%
and 6%, Britvic grew at a CAGR of 5.2%, which is above their respective industry averages.
Diageo as a company is well diversified by category, geography and price point owing to their strategic acquisitions
and active portfolio management. Their business today is set up for consistent and sustainable long-term growth
with a focus on increasing market share in the TBA industry. Britvic, on the other hand, intends to expand its
portfolio of brands and competitive advantages to become a regular staple and an affordable brand. The company
aims to do so by evaluating the best use of capital and the appropriate level of investment to deliver long-term,
sustainable growth. While both companies are committed to ensuring optimal returns to their shareholders, it is a
bigger challenge for Britvic given their goal of entering newer sub-categories and expanding their regional
presence.
APPENDIX
Enjoying Life’s Everyday Moments Annual Report and Accounts 2023. (n.d.). Available at: http://bit.ly/3vUgP86
Britvic plc (2022). Enjoying Life’s Everyday Moments Annual Report and Accounts 2022. [online] Available at:
https://bit.ly/49hQFux
Enjoying Life’s Everyday Moments. (n.d.). Available at: https://bit.ly/47UyCcM
ENJOYING LIFE’S EVERYDAY MOMENTS Annual Report and Accounts 2020. (n.d.). Available at:
https://bit.ly/49mphM1
ESG Reporting Index 2023. (n.d.). Available at: https://bit.ly/42rX0RN
Diageo Annual Report 2023. (2023). Available at: https://bit.ly/42pzPaN
Diageo Annual Report 2022. (2022). Available at: https://bit.ly/3u6ruwc
Deloitte Malta. (n.d.). COVID-19: Impact on food & beverage consumer products companies. [online] Available
at: https://bit.ly/42pTQ0P