2024:KER:21641

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF MARCH 2024 / 16TH PHALGUNA, 1945
WP(C) NO. 10204 OF 2023
PETITIONERS:

1 SREE KUMAR P.P

EX. INSPECTOR/EXECUTIVE CISF, NO.821540068, CISF UNIT
COCHIN PORT TRUST, PRESENTLY RESIDING AT KANNADISSERIL
HOUSE, KURATTISSERY, MANNAR P O, ALAPPUZHA, KERALA, PIN -
689622
2 SYAM MOHAN S.A
EX.HEAD CONSTABLE/CISF, CISF NO.991360116, CISF UNIT
KIOCL MANGALORE, KARNATAKA, PRESENTLY RESIDING AT
"KOUSTHUBHAM", MANIKANTESWARAM, PERRORKKADA PO,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, KERALA, PIN - 695013
3 SIJU V RAKHAVAN
EX HEAD CONSTABLE/CISF, CISF NO.994450146, CISF UNIT
SAC/PRL AHMEDABAD, PRESENTLY RESIDING AT VAKAMATTATHIL
HOUSE, VARAPPETTY POST, KOTHAMANGALAM, ERNAKULAM, KERALA,
PIN - 686691
BY ADVS.
T.SANJAY
SANIL KUMAR G.
RAVEENDRAN K.
MIDHUN R.

RESPONDENTS:

1 UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY

MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI, PIN -
110001
2 THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL
GROUP CENTRE, CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE, PALLIPPURAM,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, KERALA, PIN - 695316
3 THE CHAIRMAN
WELFARE AND REHABILITATION BOARD, MINISTRY OF HOME
AFFAIRS, ROOM NO.204-205, 2ND FLOOR, F WING, NIRMAN
BHAVAN, NEW DELHI, PIN - 110011
4 THE DIRECTOR GENERAL
 2024:KER:21641
WP(C) Nos.10204/2023, 13691/2023 & 8183/2024
2

CENTRAL INDUSTRIAL SECURITY FORCE, CISF HEAD QUARTERS,

CGO COMPLEX, LODHI ROAD, NEW DELHI, PIN - 110003
5 THE DIRECTOR GENERAL
CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE, CISF HEAD QUARTERS, CGO
COMPLEX, LODHI ROAD NEW DELHI, PIN - 110003
6 THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL/BSF
STATION HEAD QUARTERS, VALIYATHURA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,
PIN - 695008
7 THE COMMANDANT
INDO TIBETAN BOARDER POLICE, 27 BATTALION, NOORANAD,
ALAPPUZHA, PIN - 690571
BY ADVS.
MANU S. DSG OF INDIA
MINI GOPINATH -CGC .
GIRISH KUMAR V

SRI. P.S.APPU, GP

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON

06.03.2024, ALONG WITH WP(C).13691/2023, 8183/2024, THE COURT ON THE
SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 2024:KER:21641
WP(C) Nos.10204/2023, 13691/2023 & 8183/2024
3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF MARCH 2024 / 16TH PHALGUNA, 1945
WP(C) NO. 13691 OF 2023
PETITIONER:

CISF EX - SERVICE WELFARE ASSOCIATION

CHANDRAGIRI,HAPPY VALLEY RA NO.67, TOG - IG ROAD,
KALAMASSERY,REPRESENTED BY GENERAL SECRETARY BABU P., PIN
- 683104
BY ADVS.
V.JAYAPRADEEP
O.A.NURIYA
D.S.LOKANATHAN
ARSHIJA T.P.
LILIN LAL

RESPONDENTS:

1 UNION OF INDIA
INDIA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HOME
AFFAIRS, NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI,, PIN - 110001
2 THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL
GROUP CENTRE, CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE, PALLIPPURAM,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, KERALA, PIN - 695316
3 THE CHAIRMAN, WELFARE AND REHABILITATION BOARD
MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, ROOM NO.204-205, 2ND FLOOR, F
WING, NIRMAN BHAVAN, NEW DELHI, PIN - 110011
4 STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE DEPARTMENT OF EXCISE,
GOVERNMENT SECRETERIAT,THIRUVANATHAPURAM, PIN - 695001
5 THE DIRECTOR GENERAL
CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE,(CRPF), BLOCK NO. , CGOS
COMPLEX, LODHI ROAD, NEW DELHI, PIN - 110003
 2024:KER:21641
WP(C) Nos.10204/2023, 13691/2023 & 8183/2024
4

6 THE DIRECTOR GENERAL

INDO TEBETIAN BORDER POLICE FORCE (ITBP) BLOCK NO. CGOS
COMPLEX, LODHI ROAD, NEW DELHI, PIN - 110003
7 THE DIRECTOR GENERAL, BORDER SECURITY FORCE (BSF
BLOCK NO. CGOS COMPLEX, LODHI ROAD, NEW DELHI, PIN -
110003
8 THE DIRECTOR GENERAL, CENTRAL INDUSTRIAL FORCE (CISF),
CGOS COMPLEX, LODHI ROAD, NEW DELHI, PIN - 110003
9 THE DIRECTOR,(PERS)
POLICE - II DIVISION, R & W DIRECTORATE, MINISTRY OF HOME
AFFAIRS, 3RD FLOOR, NDCC - II BUILDING, JAI SINGH ROAD,
NEW DELHI, PIN - 110001
BY ADV MANU S. DSG OF INDIA

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON

06.03.2024, ALONG WITH WP(C).10204/2023 AND CONNECTED CASES, THE
COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 2024:KER:21641
WP(C) Nos.10204/2023, 13691/2023 & 8183/2024
5

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF MARCH 2024 / 16TH PHALGUNA, 1945
WP(C) NO. 8183 OF 2024
PETITIONERS:

1 MANI.P.K,
AGED 56 YEARS
S/O KARUPPAN K.V, RESIDING AT NELLIKKAL HOUSE, VK COLONY
PO, THEVAKKAL, BMC (VIA), ERNAKULAM DISTRICT., PIN -
682021
2 P.K SHIBINKUMAR,
AGED 59 YEARS
S/O P.A.KUTTAN, RESIDING AT PLASSERIL HOUSE, MOOTHAKUNNAM
P.O, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT., PIN - 683516
BY ADVS.
R.NIKHIL
AZHAR M.

RESPONDENTS:

1 UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,

MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI., PIN -
110001
2 THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL,
GROUP CENTRE, CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE, PALLIPPURAM,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, KERALA., PIN - 695316
3 THE CHAIRMAN,
WELFARE AND REHABILITATION BOARD, MINISTRY OF HOME
AFFAIRS, ROOM NO.204-205, 2ND FLOOR, F WING, NIRMAN
BHAVAN, NEW DELHI., PIN - 110011
4 THE COMMANDANT,
105 RAPID ACTION FORCE, BATTALION, VELLALORE P.O,
COIMBATORE DISTRICT, TAMIL NADU., PIN - 641111
 2024:KER:21641
WP(C) Nos.10204/2023, 13691/2023 & 8183/2024
6

5 THE DIRECTOR GENERAL,

CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE, CISF HEAD QUARTERS, CGO
COMPLEX, LODHI ROAD NEW DELHI., PIN - 110003

SRI.S.MANU, DSGI

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON

06.03.2024, ALONG WITH WP(C).10204/2023 AND CONNECTED CASES, THE
COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 2024:KER:21641
WP(C) Nos.10204/2023, 13691/2023 & 8183/2024
7

JUDGMENT

The petitioners in these writ petitions

are officers who retired from the service of the

‘Central Industrial Security Force’ (CISF).

They have approached this Court alleging that

they have been denied the benefit of being able

to procure liquor from the now introduced

‘Centralized Liquor Management System’ (CLMS);

and assert that this is illegal and unlawful,

since they were enjoying this in the past, as

has been explained in the pleadings.

2. I am considering the afore three writ

petitions together, since they impel analogous

facts and circumstances and see reliefs which

are similar, but for the sake of convenience,

WP(C)No.10204/2023 will be treated as the lead

 2024:KER:21641
WP(C) Nos.10204/2023, 13691/2023 & 8183/2024
8

case and all reference to documents in this case

will be as produced therein unless otherwise

specified.

3. Sri.T.Sanjay – learned counsel for the

petitioners in WP(C)No.10204/2023, pointed out

that the ‘CISF’ is the part of the ‘Central

Armed Police Forces’ (CAPF); and that the

Ministry of Home Affairs (HMA) of the

Government of India, issued an order dated

23.06.2011 – produced as Ext.P2 in these cases,

whereby, it was decided and ordered that persons

like the petitioners can get access to the

‘Central Police Canteen’ (CPC), to obtain liquor

for consumption. He then pointed that, in

order to fructify this, the Government of Kerala

issued a notification, bearing No.GO(P)

No.77/2018/TD dated 01.06.2018 - a copy of

 2024:KER:21641
WP(C) Nos.10204/2023, 13691/2023 & 8183/2024
9

which is on record as Ext.P6 in

WPC(C)No.10204/2023, through, while, all Defence

Service Personnel, Ex-Service Men and Central

Armed Police Personnel, along with Ex-Service

Central Armed Police Personnel, were included

for the benefit under the said Abkari Rules. He

submitted that, in fact, this was fortified by

the judgment of this Court subsequently

delivered in WP(C)No.18110/2016, wherein, the

submissions of the learned Central Government

Counsel was recorded that, as per an order dated

30.06.2019, “Liquor Cards” were ordered to be

issued to former ‘CISF’ personnel, so as to

enable them to draw liquor through the canteen

of the Group Centre operated by the Central

Reserve Police Force (CRPF), as per their

entitlement.
 2024:KER:21641
WP(C) Nos.10204/2023, 13691/2023 & 8183/2024
10

4. Sri.T.Sanjay – learned counsel for the

petitioners in WP(C)No.10204/2023, argued that

the scenario is thus clear, that all the

petitioners - along with various others, were

enjoying the benefit of being able to buy and

procure liquor from the Master Canteen, but that

when the regime of “CLMS” was introduced, this

has been denied. He thus prayed that the

respondents be directed to restore the privilege

enjoyed by the former ‘CISF’ personnel, to

procure liquor from the “CPCs”, forthwith.

5. However, Sri.Gireesh Kumar - Central

Government Counsel appearing for the “CLMS”,

submitted that, as has been averred in the

counter affidavit filed on behalf of his client,

there has never been a system in the ‘CISF’, of

allowing either serving or retired personnel to

 2024:KER:21641
WP(C) Nos.10204/2023, 13691/2023 & 8183/2024
11

obtain access to the liquor procurement system

and that what has been stated above by

Sri.T.Sanjay was only an arrangement that was

acceded to, not as the matter of right, but

purely as a matter of indulgence. He submitted

that the implementation of “CLMS” in ‘CISF’ was

examined by itS competent Authorities at the

highest level; but concluded that, since there

has never been any system of issuance of liquor

to its personnel, “there does not seem to be any

pressing need or serious justification for it”

(sic). He added that this is a matter of policy

and that when the petitioners themselves admit

the serving officers of ‘CISF’ have not been

granted access to the “CLMS”, there is no

justification in them seeking such, as a matter

of right through these writ petitions. He

 2024:KER:21641
WP(C) Nos.10204/2023, 13691/2023 & 8183/2024
12

concluded saying that, this is more so because,

even when the Ministry of Home Affairs,

Government of India, had, through their order

dated 31.07.2017, introduced “Rum allowance” in

the ‘CAPFs’, the same was neither be drawn or

allowed to the officers of the ‘CISF’ - either

serving or retired. He thus prayed that these

writ petitions be dismissed.

6. When I evaluate and consider the afore

submissions, it is evident that, on one hand,

the petitioners seek continuation of a privilege

that was offered to them in the past; while, the

‘CISF’ says that there is no obligation on their

part to join the “CLMS”, thus giving access to

procurement of liquor, either to the serving

officers or retired personnel.

7. There cannot be any doubt that in matters

 2024:KER:21641
WP(C) Nos.10204/2023, 13691/2023 & 8183/2024
13

of policy, the jurisdiction of this Court is

barricaded to a large extent; and this is well

settled through catena of judgment of the Hon’ble

Supreme Court.

8. However, what is relevant in these cases

is that the petitioners do not seek a new

privilege, but only something that they say was

available to them in the past; asserting it not

be taken away solely because, a new regime, in

the form of “CLMS” has been introduced by the

Government of India. It is their specific case

that, by the introduction of the “CLMS”, except

the manner of procurement of liquor – which is

now through an online platform, rather than

physical purchase – nothing has changed,

particularly when the submissions of the

Government had been recorded by this Court in the

 2024:KER:21641
WP(C) Nos.10204/2023, 13691/2023 & 8183/2024
14

aforementioned judgment.

9. I must say that there is some force in

the afore submissions of the petitioners because,

this is not a case where they are seeking that

they be given a new privilege, but only that the

benefit that was offered to them earlier be not

disturbed, merely because a new regime of

procurement of liquor has been introduced by the

Government.

10. When the ‘CISF’, in their pleadings, say

that their serving officers were never included

in the liquor procurement system – whether it be

“CLMS” or the earlier one – they do not answer

the specific assertions of the petitioners, that

the retired personnel were allowed such privilege

- which is evident from the narrative made by

their learned counsel, Sri.T.Sanjay and recorded

 2024:KER:21641
WP(C) Nos.10204/2023, 13691/2023 & 8183/2024
15

above.

11. This certainly is an issue that the

‘CISF’ must consider because, one fails to

understand why they stand in the way of persons

like the petitioners continuing their privilege,

which they were enjoying earlier, even when it is

accepted that, their policy of not allowing the

serving officers access of liquor is on account

of their functional requirements and occupational

exigencies.

12. To paraphrase, the question whether the

petitioners can be denied access to purchase

liquor, solely because there is a new regime

introduced by the Government, is an issue that

must be considered by the ‘CISF’ appropriately.

This is more so because, if the petitioners are

to obtain any benefit under the “CLMS”, then

 2024:KER:21641
WP(C) Nos.10204/2023, 13691/2023 & 8183/2024
16

certainly, it is for the ‘CISF’ to share their

details into the online system, so that the

procurement then becomes possible, which

otherwise is not now tenable.

In the afore circumstances, I allow these

writ petitions and direct the Director General of

the ‘CISF’ to reconsider the claims of the

petitioners, adverting to my observations above

and specifically to the above referred orders and

judgment of this Court, and after affording an

opportunity of being heard to the petitioners;

thus culminating in an appropriate order and

necessary action, as to whether at least the

names of the retired personnel need to be

introduced into the “CLMS”, so as to enable them

to continue to obtain the benefit of purchase of

liquor as has been done in the past.

 2024:KER:21641
WP(C) Nos.10204/2023, 13691/2023 & 8183/2024
17

A decision in this regard shall be taken by

the Director General as expeditiously as is

possible, but not later than three months from

the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment;

based on which, the request of the petitioners

for access to the “CLMS”, will then be either

acceded to or refused - as the case may be.

Sd/-
DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
JUDGE
SAS
 2024:KER:21641
WP(C) Nos.10204/2023, 13691/2023 & 8183/2024
18

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 13691/2023

PETITIONER’S EXHIBITS:

Exhibit.P1 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WPC.18110/2016

DATED.9.7.2019
Exhibit.P2 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER PASSED BY THE 5TH
RESPONDENT DATED.2.1.2023
Exhibit.P2{a} TRUE COPY OF THE ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF EXT.P2
Exhibit.P3 THE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION OF THE
PETITIONER SUBMITTED TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT
DATED 14.01.2023
Exhibit.P4 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION OF THE
PETITIONER DATED 14.01.2023 SUBMITTED TO THE
8TH RESPONDENT
Exhibit.P5 THE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION OF THE
PETITIONER GIVEN TO THE 6TH RESPONDENT DATED
16.01.2023
Exhibit.P6 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 18.01.2023 OF
THE 3RD RESPONDENT
Exhibit.P7 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 24.03.2023 IN WPC
10204/2023
Exhibit.P8 True copy of the Letter dated.23.3.2023 issued
by the 2nd Respondent
Exhibit.P9 True copy of the Letter dated.19.6.2018 issued
by the Commandant, ITB Police Force
Exhibit.P10 True copy of the Affidavit dated.16.5.2020
Exhibit.P11 True copy of the Letter dated.5.9.2018 issued
by the BSF Kozhikode to the Deputy
Commissioner of Excise , Calicut with Typed
copy
Exhibit.P12 True copy of the Letter dated.30.5.2019
Submitted by DIG,CRPF,RTC Peringome
RESPONDENTS’ EXHIBITS:

Exhibit R2(a) True copy of the CRPF Standing Order No.

4/2018 dated 20.02.2018 issued by Directorate
General CRPF, New Delhi
 2024:KER:21641
WP(C) Nos.10204/2023, 13691/2023 & 8183/2024
19

Exhibit R2(b) True copy of the Order dated 04.03.2021 issued

by MHA
Exhibit R2(c) True copy of minutes of meeting dated
06.04.2021
Exhibit R2(d) True copy of the letter dated 17.05.2021
issued by Rehabilitation and Welfare
Directorate of MHA
Exhibit R2(e) True copy of CISF HQr letter dated 23.06.2021
Exhibit R2(f) True copy of Minutes of Meeting dated
05.08.2021
Exhibit R2(g) True copy of minutes of meeting dated
09.02.2022
Exhibit R2(h) True copy of ITBP letter dated 22.05.2023
issued to Dy. Inspector General of Police,
CRPF (Law)
 2024:KER:21641
WP(C) Nos.10204/2023, 13691/2023 & 8183/2024
20

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 8183/2024

PETITIONER’S EXHIBITS
Exhibit P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE OFFICE MEMORANDUM
NO.27011/18/2006-R&W DATED 18.09.2006 ISSUED
BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT
Exhibit P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 09.07.2019
IN W.P(C) NO:18110/2016 ON THE FILES OF THIS
HON'BLE COURT
Exhibit P3 A TRUE COPY OF THE LIQUOR CARD ISSUED TO THE
1ST PETITIONER
Exhibit P4 A TRUE COPY OF THE LIQUOR CARD ISSUED TO THE
2ND PETITIONER
ExhibitP5 A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER BEARING NO: 01/2023-
(CLMS DATED 02.01.2023 ISSUED BY THE 5TH
RESPONDENT ALONG WITH ITS ENGLISH TRANSLATED
COPY
Exhibit P6 A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 24.03.2023 IN
WP(C) NO: 10204 OF 2023 ON THE FILES OF THIS
HON'BLE COURT
Exhibit P7 A TRUE COPY OF THE INTERIM ORDER DATED
21.02.2024 IN W.P.(C) NO:6592 OF 2024 ON THE
FILES OF THIS HON'BLE COURT
Exhibit P8 A TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY
THE PETITIONERS TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED
21.02.2024
Exhibit P9 A TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY
THE PETITIONERS TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED
21.02.2024
Exhibit P10 A TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY
THE PETITIONERS TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED
21.02.2024
Exhibit P11 A TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY
THE PETITIONERS TO THE 4TH RESPONDENT DATED
21.02.2024
Exhibit P12 A TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY
THE PETITIONERS TO THE 5TH RESPONDENT DATED
21.02.2024
 2024:KER:21641
WP(C) Nos.10204/2023, 13691/2023 & 8183/2024
21

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 10204/2023

PETITIONER’S EXHIBITS:

Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF DISCHARGE CERTIFICATE DATED

31.10.2021 ISSUED BY CISF TO THE 1ST
PETITIONER
Exhibit P1a TRUE COPY OF DISCHARGE CERTIFICATE DATED
07.01.2020 ISSUED BY CISF TO THE 2ND
PETITIONER
Exhibit P1b TRUE COPY OF DISCHARGE CERTIFICATE DATED
01.09.2020 ISSUED BY CISF TO THE 3RD
PETITIONER
Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE OFFICE MEMORANDUM
NO.27011/18/2006-R&W DATED 18.09.2006 ISSUED
BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT
Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 23.06.2011
ISSUED BY THE CENTRAL POLICE CANTEEN DIVISION
OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT
Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF THE OFFICE MEMORANDUM NO.
27011/100/2012- R&WS DATED 23/11/2012 ISSUED
BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT
Exhibit P5 TRUE COPY OF GAZETTE NOTIFICATION DATED
11.04.2013 ISSUED BY GOVT OF KERALA (TAXES G
DEPARTMENT)
Exhibit P6 TRUE COPY OF THE GAZETTE NOTIFICATION DATED
01.06.2018 ISSUED BY GOVT OF KERALA (TAXES "G"
DEPARTMENT)
Exhibit P7 WEB COPY OF JUDGEMENT DATED 09.07.2019 IN WP
NO.18110/2016
Exhibit P7a TRUE COPY OF THE CISF PENSIONER'S LIQUOR CARDS
BEARING NUMBER 936 IN RESPECT OF THE 1ST
PETITIONER ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT
Exhibit1 P7b TRUE COPY OF THE CISF PENSIONER'S LIQUOR CARDS
BEARING NUMBER 345 IN RESPECT OF THE 2ND
PETITIONER ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT
Exhibit P7c TRUE COPY OF THE CISF PENSIONER'S LIQUOR CARDS
BEARING NUMBER 1027 IN RESPECT OF THE 3RD
PETITIONER ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT
 2024:KER:21641
WP(C) Nos.10204/2023, 13691/2023 & 8183/2024
22

Exhibit P8 TRUE COPY OF CIRCULAR NO. 6/2022 DATED

02.01.2023 ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT ALONG
WITH ITS ENGLISH TRANSLATION COPY.
Exhibit P9 TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED
14.03.2023 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT
Exhibit P10 TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED
16.03.2023 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT
RESPONDENTS’ EXHIBITS:

Exhibit R2(a) True copy of the CRPF Standing Order No.

04/2018 dated 20.02.2018
Exhibit R2(b) True copy of the order No 27011/26/ 2019/ R
dated 04.03.2023
Exhibit R2(c) True copy of the minutes of meeting dated
06.04.2021
Exhibit R2(d) True copy of the letter No. 27011/ 130/2021-R
and W dated 17.05.2021
Exhibit R2(e) True copy of the CISF HQr letter No.
E-42099/KPKB/CLMS/WELFARE/2021-16979 dated
23.06.2021
Exhibit R2(f) True copy of the meeting minutes dated
05.08.2021
Exhibit R2(g) True copy of the meeting dated 09.02.2022