CS Student Workbook 2019
CS Student Workbook 2019
CS Student Workbook 2019
Culture Studies
Student Workbook
The copyright in this document is vested in NCC Education Limited. The document must not be
reproduced by any means, in whole or in part, or used for manufacturing purposes, except with the
prior written permission of NCC Education Limited and then only on condition that this notice is
included in any such reproduction.
Published by: NCC Education Limited, The Towers, Towers Business Park, Wilmslow Road,
Didsbury, Manchester M20 2EZ, UK.
Tel: +44 (0) 161 438 6200 Fax: +44 (0) 161 438 6240 Email: [email protected]
http://www.nccedu.com
Learning Outcome: 1
2 Subcultures 1/8 • Definition of subculture
• Aspects of subcultures
Lectures: 5 hrs
• Comparisons between different cultural
Private Study: 6 aspects
hrs
• Stereotypes
Learning Outcome: 1, 3
3 Government 1/8 • Basic types of political system
• Police and Crime
Lectures: 6 hrs
Private Study: 4
Learning Outcome: 1, 3
hrs
4 Values 1/8 • Personal, familial and societal values
Lectures: 4 hrs • Common etiquette in different countries
Private Study: 4
• Common pastimes and the values
hrs
associated with these
Learning Outcome: 1, 3, 4
5 Education 1/8 • Different stages of education systems at
Systems Lectures: 6 hrs home and abroad
Private Study: 5 • Identifying universities in different places
hrs
Learning Outcome: 1, 2
6 Application to 1/8 • Courses, subjects and methods of
Higher assessment at chosen universities
Education
Lectures: 6 hrs • The university application process
Private Study: 6 • Personal statements
hrs
Learning Outcome: 2
Learning Outcome:1, 3
8 Digital Culture 1/8 • Understanding social media, online retail
Lectures: 6 hrs and online news and its impact on culture
Private Study: 8 • Digital culture and disparity in access
hrs
• Positives/ negatives of life online on the
individual
• Positives/ negatives of life online on society
Learning Outcome: 1, 4
The teacher-led time for this module is comprised of lectures. The breakdown of the hours is also
given at the start of each topic.
You are expected to work independently but also to share your findings, views and experiences
with other classmates and your teacher.
4.1 Lectures
The lecture time for this module is given over to small-group interactive classes. Each lesson is
designed to last for one or two hours and each topic has five to six hours of contact time.
You will be expected to participate in the classes and complete activities both on your own and in
small groups. You will be able to focus on a foreign culture of particular interest to you called your
‘destination country’, and will be asked to compare and contract this with your own culture.
This time is allocated for homework. You will find details of the homework in this guide and will also
need to follow the instructions given by your teacher. You need to make sure that you allocate
sufficient time outside of the classroom to complete the required work and to develop your
understanding of other cultures.
Time is also included here for you to work on your assignment for this module.
5. Assessment
This module will be assessed by means of an assignment, based on the assessment criteria given
above, and you will be expected to demonstrate that you have met the module’s learning
outcomes.
Your teacher will provide you with the details of your assignment and set a deadline for completion.
1.2 Timings
Lessons: 6 hours
What is culture? Use dictionaries, encyclopaedias, the Internet etc, to research what ‘culture’
means. Bring definitions and examples to the next lesson.
Take one or two particular aspects of culture discussed in the class e.g. music, and make
a detailed comparison of that aspect in your culture and in the culture of your destination
country. What are the major similarities and differences? Think about private, public, and
national approaches to that aspect. Do they differ within a country and between countries?
Taking music as an example, people might listen to different music privately or in a
different way than they do publicly. Do people go to concerts? What kind? What role does
music have at a national level? Do people in both countries feel strongly about their
national anthem? Is there a particular type of music that is part of the national character?
Choose your own aspect of culture to compare.
Every year my friends and I hold a super bowl party. The super bowl is the final game of the year in
American football. About 50 million people watch the game on TV. It doesn’t matter what clothes
we wear to the party, it’s about being together and having fun, so most people are usually in jeans
and sweaters. Each year we go to someone’s house and watch the game on TV. We usually order
delivery food or takeout food from a restaurant. We typically eat pizza, BBQ chicken wings or
meatball subs. For some of my friends, it’s the only football game they watch each year. The result
is very important and we watch the game carefully, often yelling and cheering at the TV! During the
commercial breaks, we chat and eat. It’s a great way to be with my friends and it’s something I will
do every year for the rest of my life.
Every year my family and I celebrate Vietnamese New Year together. We live in Melbourne,
Australia, so the way we do things is different from the way my parents used to do things in their
country. We usually go to the street festival, which is organised by the council and community
leaders. We wear traditional clothes – they look quite beautiful, but too fancy (I would never wear
them normally!) – and meet friends and family at the festival. We watch lion dances and other
performances by students, clubs, and even the local Melbourne police band! Some performances
are traditional Vietnamese and some are modern. We can buy all sorts of Vietnamese snacks and
take part in games and activities. In the evening, we always go to my grandmother’s house and eat
rice cakes. Our entire extended family will all be there; it’s a time to wear new clothes, and think
about the New Year, so it is a very special day for us.
When someone gets married in my community, it’s a very religious occasion. There will be a
wedding ceremony in the local church, performed by our minister. The bride and groom may not
see each other on the day, until the bride arrives at the church and walks down the aisle to meet
the groom - we believe that would be bad luck. The groom wears a black suit and white shirt, and
the bride wears a white dress. All the bride and groom’s family and friends will be there. They will
wear their best clothes – it looks very formal. Everyone in the church will pray and sing hymns as
part of the ceremony. When the minister has officially married the couple, a special song is played
and the couple walk out of the church as man and wife. Later, there is a dinner party where the
couple will have a large wedding cake that they cut, both holding the knife, together.
Think of a cultural practice that you take part in – it could be a: Celebration, Ritual, Special
date, National event, Ceremony, Festival and Public holiday
Think about what you do at that time: What do you: Wear? Eat? Say? Sing? Listen to?
See? Believe? Where do you go? Why is it important?
What is the meaning of “Cultural Ecology”? Use dictionaries, encyclopaedias and the Internet to
research this term. Can you find 3 examples of cultural ecology?
Share your list with the class; try to outline the major similarities and differences between cultural
components in different countries. Explain possible influences on these examples.
What is the meaning of “subculture”? Use dictionaries, encyclopaedias and the Internet to research
this term. What examples can you find of a subculture?
Topic 2: Subculture
2.1 Learning Objectives
This topic aims to help students define and understand subculture. They will explore stereotypes
and consider how they influence our opinions and behaviours.
2.2 Timings
Lessons: 5 hours
Who am I?
Aussies
Choose a country that you plan to travel to, or would like to travel to.
People’s appearance?
• Food?
• Clothes?
• Housing?
• Transport?
• Cities?
• Sports?
• Religion?
• Attitudes?
• Climate?
Do you think your ideas about the above country come from stereotypes?
Topic 3: Government
3.1 Learning Objectives
In this topic, students will look at how countries organise themselves from a governmental and
social viewpoint. They will explore different political and value systems and look at how this affects
citizens’ behaviour.
3.2 Timings
Lessons: 6 hours
Research the system of government in your destination country. If your destination country in the
UK or US, research the system in more detail, looking at how individuals participate in the system
of government via voting, running for election locally or nationally etc, what political parties exist
and the differences between them etc.
Task 1
Create a Venn diagram and use your notes and any additional research to compare the political
system in your home country to the system in your destination country.
Task 2
Private Study: preparation for next lesson
What does the police force look like in your country? What do they wear?
What different kinds of police are there in your country? (traffic, undercover, detectives, etc.)
Can you find any pictures of police in your country? If possible, print some pictures to bring to the
next lesson.
What do you think the police will be like in your destination country? List 5 words or write
sentences if you prefer.
Can you find any information or pictures about the police in your destination country? If possible,
print pictures or articles to bring to the next lesson.
Do you think these police are very different to those from your home country? What similarities or
differences do you notice?
Topic 4: Values
4.1 Learning Objectives
In this topic, students will look at how countries organise themselves from a governmental and
social viewpoint. They will explore different political and value systems and look at how this affects
citizens’ behaviour.
• Demonstrate awareness of both the values systems of their country and another country
• Identify common etiquette in their home country
• Demonstrate understanding of the etiquette of another country
• Common pastimes and the values related to them
4.2 Timings
Lessons: 4 hours
Wang Li is a 25-year old Chinese student studying in Australia. She has been there for 6
months. She is talking to Maria, an Australian friend.
“Before I came to Australia, I never did any housework. My mother did all the housework.
She also did the cooking”
Maria replies, “I always helped with the housework. After my 13th birthday my sister and I
also did a lot of cooking.”
1. Maria probably thought that, because Wang Li did not do any housework:
a. Wang Li is lazy.
d. Other….
i. Other…..
Discuss your choice with your lecturer and the rest of the class.
C. It isn’t possible to combine a happy family life with a career – for men or women.
H. The state should pay for women to stay at home and look after their children.
J. Children are the future, so they are more important than adults.
K. Women are luckier than men. They can choose whether to work or not, but men are
expected to be the bread-winners.
What is etiquette? Use a dictionary or the Internet to research what ‘etiquette’ means. Write your
definition below.
Can you find any online articles about etiquette? Use the Internet to research etiquette in other
countries.
List some facts about etiquette in the country you would like to visit and write whether it is the
same or different in your culture.
Prepare 1 role play that demonstrates what to do in that scenario in your home country
and 1 role play that demonstrates the correct etiquette in your destination country for the
same scenario. You might need to research etiquette in your destination country in the
scenario you have chosen.
5.2 Timings
Lessons: 6 hours
Research the education system of your destination country in depth. Create a flow chart
for your destination countries education system. Compare the education system of your
destination country with the education system of your home country.
1 hour
Research the kinds of skills, knowledge and understanding you are expected to have at
the end of high school in a subject you would like to/ intend to study as an undergraduate.
For example, if you would like to study Engineering in the UK, look at the national
curriculum for maths or physics at level 3 in the UK. A good place to start would be the
Ofqual website (Ofqual is the assessment regulatory body in the UK who publishes
material related to the national curriculum on their website)
If you would like to study History in Australia, you might start on the Australian Curriculum,
Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACRA) website.
Do you feel that there might be gaps in your knowledge, skills and understanding now?
How might you bridge those gaps to improve your success in your first year of studying
abroad?
• Demonstrate knowledge of the kinds of courses, the subjects and assessment available at
certain foreign universities;
• Understand the university application process
• Understand the purpose and process of writing a personal statement or essay for university
applications;
• Identify what makes a strong personal statement.
6.2 Timings
Lessons: 6 hours
Pay attention to the structure of the courses, including how a major/minor is calculated,
and how many subjects are needed to graduate.
Compare your plans in groups. Share your plans with the class. Consider if the courses
seem similar to those in your own country and identify any major differences.
Complete an application form for one of the universities in your top 5. You can find them on their
website.
• Think about the kinds of questions commonly asked in an interview and understand
that they are similar to that in the application form and personal statement.
• Research advice from universities on how to prepare for interview. Universities such
as Cambridge and Oxford almost always invite candidates to interview so might
have some good advice.
Topic 7: Work
7.1 Learning Objectives
In this topic students will focus on the world of work. Students will consider different attitudes to
work across the world, work culture and differing organisational and management structures as
well as cultural differences in international business. Students will look at different types of
multinational organisations as they relate to culture, understand the benefits of cultural diversity in
an organisation and how cultural factors impact communication.
7.2 Timings
Lessons: 6 hours
Consider;
• Email
• Instant messages such as Skype or Microsoft Teams
• Video conferences
“When employees respect each other and get along in the workplace, it’s amazing how productivity
increases, morale increases and employees are more courteous to customers.”
– Maureen Wild
Image: unsplash
Diversity and inclusion are topics on many executive agendas. Companies should be working to
create more diversity within and outside of their organisation, because firstly, it’s the right thing to
do, and secondly, it makes business sense. Companies in the top quartile for gender diversity
outperform their competitors by 15% and those in the top quartile for ethnic diversity outperform
their competitors by 35%.
If you want to create a diverse solution or product, you need a diverse team and leadership. So,
how can companies reach those targets, create more diverse products and outperform
competitors?
Top-level buy-in
Executive buy-in is a necessity. A shift in industry cannot be expected without engaging those who
pull the strings. A 2016 study by Fenwick and West showed that the largest 150 Silicon Valley
public companies averaged only 14 % women directors and an average of only 0.8 women
executive officers. Additionally, almost 58% of main boards in the FTSE100 currently have no
ethnic minority presence. This means companies must engage people which D&I strategies do not
usually directly affect. Executive buy-in should focus on highlighting the business benefits of having
diverse teams and inclusive environments. When employees “think their organisation is committed
to and supportive of diversity, and they feel included,’ their ability to innovate increases by 83%. As
an executive, your role should be focused around running your company in the best way possible,
which empowers your employees. Executives need to embody any diversity and inclusion strategy
Having top-level buy-in is only one step in any strategy. Organisations must create environments
which allow people to bring their whole, true selves to work and understand they can climb the
career ladder internally - they should feel a sense of belonging. Leaders cannot continue to look
and sound the same, as this directly forms the unconscious/unchecked bias that these traits are
associated with success. Companies need to create environments where people of all races,
genders, sexuality, religions, socio-economic backgrounds (and everything in between) can thrive
and realistically see themselves as leaders within the industry. To foster this culture, companies
need to have a theme of allyship throughout the organisation.
What is allyship?
Allyship can take many forms - the overarching themes to follow are:
Allyship gives visibility and credit to under-represented groups, ensuring their voices are heard and
actioned accordingly.
Humans need to see people who look, sound and have similar backgrounds to them in their
leadership and organisation – additionally, they need to see people who do not look, sound or have
similar backgrounds to them. The industry needs to embrace diversity and inclusion because tech
does not have just one face.
Unconscious bias should be readily discussed in your organisation and regular training given to all
levels of the organisation on recognizing privilege and bias. Typically, underrepresented groups of
employees are in junior or mid-tier roles meaning these people are actively working with middle-
management in their daily roles. Simply providing training for executive level/partners will not
directly positively affect the environments in which these people work in – companies need to
invest in training middle-management to ensure they understand any bias on their part, their role in
empowering their team members and their ability to make the tech industry of tomorrow better than
the one which exists today.
A shift in diversity won’t happen without time and financial investment. There is no magic spell to
fix the issues the industry faces, but by taking steps internally and externally, we can expect an
impact in what the tech teams and leaders of tomorrow look like – and ultimately, a healthier
bottom line.
https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/organization/our-insights/delivering-through-diversity
Mckinsey and Company is an American Worldwide management consultancy firm who helps
organisations create change that matters.
Our latest research reinforces the link between diversity and company financial performance—and
suggests how organizations can craft better inclusion strategies for a competitive edge.
Downloadable Resources
Awareness of the business case for inclusion and diversity is on the rise. While social justice
typically is the initial impetus behind these efforts, companies have increasingly begun to regard
inclusion and diversity as a source of competitive advantage, and specifically as a key enabler of
growth. Yet progress on diversification initiatives has been slow. And companies are still uncertain
about how they can most effectively use diversity and inclusion to support their growth and value-
creation goals.
Our latest study of diversity in the workplace, Delivering through diversity, reaffirms the global
relevance of the link between diversity—defined as a greater proportion of women and a more
mixed ethnic and cultural composition in the leadership of large companies—and company
financial outperformance. The new analysis expands on our 2015 report, Why diversity matters, by
drawing on an enlarged data set of more than 1,000 companies covering 12 countries, measuring
not only profitability (in terms of earnings before interest and taxes, or EBIT) but also longer-term
value creation (or economic profit), exploring diversity at different levels of the organization,
considering a broader understanding of diversity (beyond gender and ethnicity), and providing
insight into best practices.
Gender and ethnic diversity are clearly correlated with profitability, but women and minorities
remain under-represented.
Several other findings on gender diversity, ethnic diversity, and diversity around the world are also
interesting.
Gender diversity
Gender diversity is correlated with both profitability and value creation. In our 2017 data set, we
found a positive correlation between gender diversity on executive teams and both our measures
of financial performance: top-quartile companies on executive-level gender diversity worldwide had
a 21 percent likelihood of outperforming their fourth-quartile industry peers on EBIT margin, and
they also had a 27 percent likelihood of outperforming fourth-quartile peers on longer-term value
creation, as measured using an economic-profit (EP) margin
For gender, the executive team shows the strongest correlation. We found that having gender
diversity on executive teams, specifically, to be consistently positively correlated with higher
Executive teams of outperforming companies have more women in line roles versus staff roles. We
tested the hypothesis that having more women executives in line roles (typically revenue
generating) is more closely correlated with financial outperformance. We know from research, such
as our Women in the Workplace 2017 report, that women are underrepresented in line roles. In our
data set, this holds true even for top-quartile gender-diverse companies experiencing above-
average financial performance. Yet these top-quartile companies also have a greater proportion of
women in line roles than do their fourth-quartile peers: 10 percent versus 1 percent of total
executives, respectively.
The penalty for not being diverse on both measures persists. Now, as previously, companies in the
fourth quartile on both gender and ethnic diversity are more likely to underperform their industry
peers on profitability: 29 percent in our 2017 data set.
Ethnic and cultural diversity on executive teams is low. We focused on our US and UK data sets to
examine ethnically and culturally diverse representation among US and UK companies,
considering the pipeline starting with university graduates. Black Americans comprise 10 percent of
US graduates but hold only 4 percent of senior-executive positions, Hispanics and Latinos
comprise 8 percent of graduates versus 4 percent of executives, and for Asian Americans, the
numbers are 7 percent of graduates versus 5 percent of executives. In the United Kingdom, the
disparity is even greater: 22 percent of university students identify as black and minority ethnic, yet
only 8 percent of UK executives in our sample do.
Black women executives are underrepresented in line roles and may face a harder path to
CEO. As discussed, within our US and UK data sets, overall representation of women on executive
teams shows an apparent bias toward staff roles. Among our US sample, not only do women hold
a disproportionately small share of line roles on executive teams but also women of colour
(including Asian, black, and Latina women) hold an even smaller share.
Line roles versus staff roles on executive teams tend to differ in their ability to propel individuals to
the CEO position, with line roles the more likely incubators of future CEOs. In our US sample,
black female executives, specifically, are more than twice as likely to be in staff roles than in line
roles, and our sample denotes an absence of black female CEOs. Other studies have found
that black women suffer a double burden of bias that keeps them from the uppermost levels of
corporate leadership. Underrepresentation on executive teams in general, and in line roles in
particular, could be an important piece of this story.
The picture on ethnic and cultural diversity on executive teams is nuanced. Among our sample,
South Africa has the highest levels of diverse representation on executive teams, with 16 percent
of executive positions held by blacks. However, this must be understood in the context of local
demographics: South Africa’s population is 79 percent black, but among large corporations, the
impact of South Africa’s complicated social history means that the large majority of global and
national corporate entities are led by white executives (69 percent in our sample). As our work
considers the local context with respect to ethnicity, we therefore evaluated South Africa’s diversity
from this perspective, defining black South Africans as the minority. Singapore, the United
Kingdom, and the United States follow South Africa with 11 to 12 percent of ethnically diverse
executives.
When considering ethnic-minority representation in the broader population, British executive teams
seem closer to achieving a “fair share.” This, however, masks huge variations within the UK data
set, in which a large proportion of companies have no ethnic minorities on their executive teams (or
boards) and a handful of companies have particularly international executive teams. Ethnically
diverse representation on UK and US executive teams increased by an average of six and five
percentage points, respectively, since 2014. However, this was offset by declines in other
geographies, leading to an overall lower increase of one percentage point across regions.
Articulate and cascade CEO commitment to galvanize the organization. Companies increasingly
recognize that commitment to inclusion and diversity starts at the top, with many companies
publicly committing to an I&D agenda. Leading companies go further, cascading this commitment
throughout their organizations, particularly to middle management. They promote ownership by
their core businesses, encourage role modeling, hold their executives and managers to account,
and ensure efforts are sufficiently resourced and supported centrally.
Define inclusion and diversity priorities that are based on the drivers of the business-growth
strategy. Top-performing companies invest in internal research to understand which specific
strategies best support their business-growth priorities. Such strategies include attracting and
retaining the right talent and strengthening decision-making capabilities. Leading companies also
identify the mix of inherent traits (such as ethnicity) and acquired traits (such as educational
Craft a targeted portfolio of inclusion and diversity initiatives to transform the organisation. Leading
companies use targeted thinking to prioritize the I&D initiatives in which they invest, and they
ensure there is alignment with the overall growth strategy. They recognize the necessity of building
an inclusive organizational culture, and they use a combination of “hard” and “soft” wiring to create
a coherent narrative and program that resonates with employees and stakeholders, helping to
drive sustainable change.
Tailor the strategy to maximize local impact. Top and rapidly improving companies recognize the
need to adapt their approach—to different parts of the business, to various geographies, and to
sociocultural contexts.
Paying rigorous attention to all four imperatives (Exhibit 6) helps to ensure that inclusion and
diversity will support a company’s growth agenda. In our experience, companies tend to fall short
on leadership accountability for meeting goals, on building the business case, and on the
coherence and prioritization of the resulting action plan.
It is worth noting that while progress on representation can be brought about relatively rapidly with
the right set of initiatives, embedding inclusion within the organization can take many years and
often requires action outside the organization. Companies that do this well can create a strong
corporate ethos that resonates across employee, customer, supplier, investor, and broader
stakeholder groups.
This work sheds light on how companies can use inclusion and diversity as an enabler of business
impact. It is important to note, however, that correlation does not demonstrate causality, which
would be challenging to demonstrate. While not causal, we observe a real relationship between
diversity and performance that has persisted over time and scale, and across geographies. There
are clear and compelling hypotheses for why this relationship persists including improved access
to talent, enhanced decision making and depth of consumer insight and strengthened employee
engagement and license to operate. We encourage businesses to examine the case for inclusion
and diversity at a more granular level to craft an approach that is tailored to their business, learning
from leading diverse companies around the world as to ways to do this with high impact.
The business case for diversity continues to be compelling and to have global relevance. There’s
an opportunity for promoting diversity in senior decision-making roles, and specifically in line roles
on executive teams. Although levels of diverse representation in top teams are still highly variable
globally—with progress being slow overall—there are practical lessons from successful companies
that have made inclusion and diversity work. Creating an effective inclusion and diversity strategy
is no small effort and requires strong, sustained, and inclusive leadership. But we, and many of the
companies we studied, believe the potential benefits of stronger business performance are well
worth it.
8.2 Timings
Lessons: 6 hours
Estimate what proportion of your time you spend online and what proportion offline to
communicate with friends, family members, teachers or colleagues, or conduct official
business with companies and organisations such as buying goods, paying household bills,
applying for jobs etc.
Estimate how much ‘news’ you read online and offline. What proportion of your online
news comes from official sites such as newspapers and state/government media, and how
much comes from friends and other unofficial sources such as social media?
NB: If you would prefer, you can substitute this report for a more recent version. They are
published annually in the Autumn. Simply search online for ‘Reuter’s Institute Digital News
Report’ and the year you are in and read the executive summary and key findings.
This year’s report comes against the backdrop of rising populism, political and economic
instability, along with intensifying concerns about giant tech companies and their impact on
society. News organisations have taken the lead in reporting these trends, but also find
themselves challenged by them – further depressing an industry reeling from more than a
decade of digital disruption. Platform power – and the ruthless efficiency of their
advertising operations – has undermined news business models contributing to a series of
high-profile layoffs in traditional (Gannett) and digital media (Mic, BuzzFeed) in the early
part of 2019. Political polarisation has encouraged the growth of partisan agendas online,
which together with clickbait and various forms of misinformation is helping to further
undermine trust in media – raising new questions about how to deliver balanced and fair
reporting in the digital age.
Against this background we are seeing some real shifts of focus. News organisations are
increasingly looking to subscription and membership or other forms of reader contribution
to pay the bills in a so-called ‘pivot to paid’. Platforms are rethinking their responsibilities in
the face of events (Christchurch attacks, Molly Russell suicide) and regulatory threats, with
Facebook rebalancing its business towards messaging apps and groups – the so-called
‘pivot to private’. Meanwhile audiences continue to embrace on-demand formats with new
excitement around podcasts (New York Times, Guardian) and voice technologies – the so-
called ‘pivot to audio’.
Page 64 of 69 Culture Studies Student Guide
And amid all this frenetic change, some are beginning to question whether the news media
are still fulfilling their basic mission of holding powerful people to account and helping
audiences understand the world around them. The questioning comes in the form of
government inquiries in some countries into the future sustainability of quality journalism
(with recommendations as to what can be done to support it). But it also comes from parts
of the public who feel that the news media often fall short of what people expect from
them.
Our report this year, based on data from almost 40 countries and six continents, aims to
cast light on these key issues, principally through our survey data but supplemented with
in-depth qualitative research on the news habits of young people in the UK and US. The
overall story is captured in this Executive Summary, followed by Section 2 with chapters
containing additional analysis on key themes and then individual country pages in Section
3 carrying additional context provided by local experts in each market.
• Despite the efforts of the news industry, we find only a small increase in the numbers
paying for any online news – whether by subscription, membership, or donation. Growth is
limited to a handful of countries mainly in the Nordic region (Norway 34%, Sweden 27%)
while the number paying in the US (16%) remains stable after a big jump in 2017.
• Even in countries with higher levels of payment, the vast majority only have ONE online
subscription – suggesting that ‘winner takes all’ dynamics are likely to be important. One
encouraging development though is that most payments are now ‘ongoing’, rather than
one-offs.
• In some countries, subscription fatigue may also be setting in, with the majority preferring
to spend their limited budget on entertainment (Netflix/Spotify) rather than news. With
many seeing news as a ‘chore’, publishers may struggle to substantially increase the
market for high-priced ‘single title’ subscriptions. As more publishers launch pay models,
over two-thirds (70%) of our sample in Norway and half (50%) in the United States now
come across one or more barriers each week when trying to read online news.
• In many countries, people are spending less time with Facebook and more time with
WhatsApp and Instagram than this time last year. Few users are abandoning Facebook
entirely, though, and it remains by far the most important social network for news.
• People in these countries are also far more likely than in the West to be part of large
WhatsApp groups with people they don’t know – a trend that reflects how messaging
applications can be used to easily share information at scale, potentially encouraging the
spread of misinformation. Public and private Facebook Groups discussing news and
politics have become popular in Turkey (29%) and Brazil (22%) but are much less used in
Western countries such as Canada (7%) or Australia (7%).
Page 65 of 69 Culture Studies Student Guide
• Concern about misinformation and disinformation remains high despite efforts by
platforms and publishers to build public confidence. In Brazil 85% agree with a statement
that they are worried about what is real and fake on the internet. Concern is also high in
the UK (70%) and US (67%), but much lower in Germany (38%) and the Netherlands
(31%).
• Across all countries, the average level of trust in the news in general is down 2
percentage points to 42% and less than half (49%) agree that they trust the news media
they themselves use. Trust levels in France have fallen to just 24% (-11) in the last year as
the media have come under attack over their coverage of the Yellow Vests movement.
Trust in the news found via search (33%) and social media remains stable but extremely
low (23%). Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism / Digital News Report 2019 10
• Worries about the quality of information may be good for trusted news brands. Across
countries over a quarter (26%) say they have started relying on more ‘reputable’ sources
of news – rising to 40% in the US. A further quarter (24%) said they had stopped using
sources that had a dubious reputation in the last year. But the often low trust in news
overall, and in many individual brands, underlines this is not a development that will help
all in the industry.
• The news media are seen as doing a better job at breaking news than explaining it.
Across countries, almost two-thirds feel the media are good at keeping people up to date
(62%), but are less good at helping them understand the news (51%). Less than half
(42%) think the media do a good job in holding rich and powerful people to account – and
this figure is much lower in South Korea (21%), Hungary (20%), and Japan (17%).
• There are also significant differences within countries, as people with higher levels of
formal education are more likely to evaluate the news media positively along every
dimension than the rest of the population, suggesting that the news agenda is more
geared towards the interests and needs of the more educated.
• To understand the rise of populism and its consequences for news and media use, we
have used two questions to identify people with populist attitudes, and compared their
news and media use with those of non-populists. People with populist attitudes are more
likely to identify television as their main source of news, more likely to rely on Facebook for
online news, and less likely to trust the news media overall.
• More people say they actively avoid the news (32%) than when we last asked this
question two years ago. Avoidance is up 6 percentage points overall and 11 points in the
UK, driven by boredom, anger, or sadness over Brexit. People say they avoid the news
because it has a negative effect on their mood (58%) or because they feel powerless to
change events.
• The smartphone continues to grow in importance for news, with two-thirds (66%) now
using the device to access news weekly (+4pp). Mobile news aggregators like Apple News
and Upday are becoming a more significant force. Apple News in the United States now
reaches more iPhone users (27%) than the Washington Post (23%).
• The growth of the smartphone has also been driving the popularity of podcasts,
especially with the young. More than a third of our combined sample (36%) say they have
Page 66 of 69 Culture Studies Student Guide
consumed at least one podcast over the last month but this rises to half (50%) for those
under 35. The mobile phone is the most used device (55%) for podcast listening.
• Voice-activated smart speakers like the Amazon Echo and Google Home continue to
grow rapidly. Usage for any purpose has risen from 9% to 12% in the United States, from
7% to 14% in the UK, from 5% to 11% in Canada, and from 4% to 8% in Australia. Despite
this, we find that usage for news remains low in all markets.
Nicole Martin
AI & Big Data
It’s the age of “fake news” and gone are the days of waiting for the morning news for
breaking stories or reading gossip magazines for the latest celebrity dirt. We now have all
the information we need at the touch of an app and most people now get their news
information online, specifically from social media.
Social media has become the main source of news online with more than 2.4 billion
internet users, nearly 64.5 percent receive breaking news from Facebook, Twitter,
YouTube, Snapchat and Instagram instead of traditional media.
In a recent survey, 50 percent of Internet users surveyed said that they hear about the
latest news via social media before ever hearing about it on a news station. Many internet
users will see the breaking stories on their feed and go to the news sites to learn more.
The survey found 57 percent increase in traffic to news sites referred from social media.
However, there has been a decrease in how much of an article that people read. Most
people will just scroll through their newsfeed and stumble upon relevant news content but
just read the headlines or a short video clip of the piece. An average visitor will only read
an article for 15 seconds or less and the average video watch time online is 10 seconds.
However, social platforms have a control over what news and information we see. Our
social media friends have become the “managing editors” deciding what we see. An article
needs to be "liked" and shared multiple times before many people see it in their feed.
Therefore social media and your social friends have control over what news pieces you
see and what you do not. There are also many "fake news" websites that compete for
attention with sensational headlines and ridiculous storylines that tend to get shared more
often due to the lack of readers fact checking or reading more than the headline. That
means that authentic content is hard to come by now. In fact, fake news is actually more
likely to spread than the truth.
“Falsehood diffused significantly farther, faster, deeper, and more broadly than the truth in
all categories of information, and the effects were more pronounced for false political news
than for false news about terrorism, natural disasters, science, urban legends, or financial
information,” the team, led by Sinan Aral of the Massachusetts Institute of
Technology, wrote in the journal Science.
Page 68 of 69 Culture Studies Student Guide
Also, timely and sensational news does better like Buzzfeed who has 17.2 million
subscribers. Content needs to be shareable and likable so often times it is overly
exaggerated for social. Brands can pay more to appear in news feeds and get noticed.
While syndication is nothing new, it is more prevalent in social media with so much
information allowed to be given at once and 24/7.
News happens fast now. Today’s story will be tomorrow’s forgotten story. It is easy to miss
things now because of how quick stories can get turned around and shared. While having
so much information at our fingertips is great, it is worth always checking sources and not
taking headlines as truth. With social media as our new news managers, it is up to us to be
the new fact checkers for media.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/nicolemartin1/2018/11/30/how-social-media-has-changed-
how-we-consume-news/#3edf2efc3c3c
Think about how the contract clashes or fits in with the dimensions of culture you learnt
about earlier in this unit, specifically (1) Power distance, (2) Individualism and (3) Low-
contextualism
Think about your own country and your destination country and consider whether the
contract for the web would be welcomed or whether it would clash with the way that people
use the web.