INSTRUCTION FOR MAQMSR SUPPLIER AUDIT

1. ALL AUTOMOTIVE MANUFACTURERS THAT ARE NOT CERTIFIED TO TS-16949 BY

SEPTEMBER 2015, BUT SUPPLY PARTS TO CUSTOMER(S) THAT ARE CERTIFIED TO
ISO TS-16949 WILL BE REQUIRED TO MEET AT MINIMUM ISO-9001 AND MAQMSR
(MINIMUM AUTOMOTIVE QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS)

2. THE AUDIT SHOULD BE PERFORMED BY REFERENCING THE ACTUAL MAQMSR GUIDELINES

FOR MORE CLARITY IF NEEDED.

3. YOU NEED TO FILL OUT THE CHECKLIST (IDENTIFIED ON TAB). AUDIT TO EACH QUESTION SO AS
TO BE AS ACCURATE AS POSSIBLE. PROVIDE EVIDENCE DOCUMENTATION

4. INTERNAL AUDIT SUMMARY WILL AUTOMATICALLY FILL IN FROM CHECKLIST.

5. IF THIS IS COMPLETED BY THE SUPPLIER, AS A SELF-AUDIT PLEASE

ENSURE ROCKNEL RECEIVES A COPY ([email protected])
6. FOR SUPPLIER SELF-AUDITS THE PLANT NEEDS TO HAVE DEFINED CRITERIA
THAT JUSTIFIES A SELF-AUDIT
7. FORWARD A COPY OF ALL COMPLETED AUDITS TO [email protected]

NOTE: IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT ([email protected])

 MINIMUM AUTOMOTIVE QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS AUDIT Revision: 09-09-15

(MAQMSR)

PLANT

Section from MAQMSR

Supplier Name: Audit Date:
MANAGER:
QUALITY
Supplier Location: Auditor Name:
MANAGER:
0 - Supplier demonstrates no compliance to a 2 - Supplier has a documented system and
1 - Supplier has a documented system 3 - Supplier has a documented process
documented system OR no documented system in shows only minor exceptions of non-
but shows only limited compliance. and can demonstrate full compliance.
place. compliance.

1. CONTROL PLAN AUDIT WORKSHEET

QUESTION: EVIDENCE Score
# REQUIRED
LOOK FOR
(0,1,2,3)
G/Y/R OBSERVATIONS

DEVELOP CONTROL PLANS AT THE CORRECT WELL CONSTRUCTED,

1.1 1 SYSTEM, SUBSYSTEM, COMPONENT? CONTROL PLANS ACCURATE & CURRENT
CORRECT SHOULD BE IDENTIFIED
PRE-LAUNCH AND PRODUCTION
1.1 2 CONTROL PLANS
CONTROL PLANS ON EACH ONE
FOR EACH PHASE. INDICATING PHASE.
ENSURE PROPER
LIST CONTROLS FOR CORRECT IDENTIFICATION OF
1.1 3 MANUFACTURING PROCESS? CONTROL PLANS CONTROL METHODS ARE
LISTED.
CORRECTLY THIS MAY INCLUDE 100%
INCLUDE METHODS FOR MONITORING
1.1 4 FOR SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS?
CREATED CONTROL VISUAL, SENSORS,
PLANS CAMERAS, ETC..

ANY SPECIAL CUSTOMER

CORRECT
DEFINED CONTROLS
INCLUDE CUSTOMER-REQUIRED INFO. CONTROL PLANS/
1.1 5 (IF APPLICABLE)? WORK
ALSO INCLUDED IN WORK
INSTRUCTIONS AT WORK
INSTRUCTIONS
CELL

LOOK FOR EVIDENCE ON

INITIATE REACTION PLAN WHEN
REACTION TO SAID QUALITY INSPECTION
1.1 6 PROCESS IS UNSTABLE OR
CONDITIONS SHEETS, AND SPC
STATISTICALLY OUT OF CONTROL
RECORDS.
WORK INSTRUCTIONS ARE AVAILABLE CONTROL PLANS / LOOK FOR LINKS
1.2 7 AND ARE DERIVED FROM WORK BETWEEN THESE TWO
APPROPRIATE CONTROL PLANS INSTRUCTIONS DOCUMENTS.
JOB SET-UPS ARE VERIFIED,
SET-UP RECORDS / CURRENT FIRST PIECE
1.3 8 INCLUDING WORK INSTRUCTIONS FOR
INSTRUCTIONS APPROVAL
SET UP & START UP

INSTRUCTIONS, PM CHECK FOR RECORDED

ARE THERE PLANNED MAINTENANCE
1.4 9 ACTIVITIES?
SOFTWARE, FREQUENCIES &
RECORDS, ETC… COMPLETION

PACKAGING, PROTECTION AND STORAGE AREAS,

PROCEDURE /
1.4 10 PRESEVATION OF EQUIPMENT
INSTRUCTIONS
ENVIRONMENTALLY SAFE
TOOLING AND GAUGES IN PLACE? ETC...?
STORAGE AREAS,
INSTRUCTIONS, PM COUNTING MECHANISMS
ARE SPARE PARTS AVAILABLE FOR
1.4 11 KEY EQUIPMENT?
SOFTWARE, i.e. SOFTWARE FOR
RECORDS, ETC… INVENTORY PURPOSES
ETC...

ARE CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT

TARGETS ESTABLISHED FOR WRITTEN MANAGEMENT REVIEW
1.4 12 PLANNED AND UNPLANNED OBJECTIVES RECORDS OR OTHER.
DOWNTIME?

EACH AND EVERY

CLEAR PRECISE
CONTAINER THAT HOLDS
IS PRODUCT THROUGHOUT THE INFORMATION
MATERIAL,
PLANT CLEARLY IDENTIFIED AS TO USUALLY ON LABEL
1.5 13 MATERIAL IDENTIFICATION AND , AS STATED IN AN
COMPONENTS, W.I.P.,
AND FINISHED GOODS,
STATUS? PRODCEDURE OR
ALL REQUIRE
INSTRUCTION.
IDENTIFICATION.

2 of 12
 MINIMUM AUTOMOTIVE QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS AUDIT Revision: 09-09-15

(MAQMSR)
PER CONTROL PLAN
CONTROL PLAN,
HAS THE SUPPLIER IDENTIFIED CHECK STATUS AFTER
APPLICABLE
1.5 14 PRODUCT STATUS WITH RESPECT TO EACH INSPECTION POINT

Section from MAQMSR

INSTRUCTIONS,
INPECTION CHECKS? FOR IDENTIFICATION OF
RECORDS
STATUS
WHERE TRACEABILITY IS A
LOT # OR DATES OF
1.5 15 REQUIREMENT, DOES THE SUPPLIER LOGS / RECORDS
MANUFACTURE
MAINTAIN RECORDS?

3 of 12
 MINIMUM AUTOMOTIVE QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS AUDIT Revision: 09-09-15

(MAQMSR)
2. PROCESS APPROACH AUDIT WORKSHEET
EVIDENCE
QUESTION: LOOK FOR Score G/Y/R OBSERVATIONS

Section from MAQMSR

REQUIRED

APPROPRIATE
DOCUMENTS DEFINE
INPUTS, SERIES OF
OUTPUTS, TO INCLUDE
ALL RESOURCES,
MATERIALS, METHODS,
PROCESS MAPS,
HAS THE SUPPLIER DEFINED IT'S MEASUREMENTS
2.1 1 PROCESSES AND SUB-PROCESSES?
FLOW DIAGRAMS,
NECESSARY TO MAKE
ETC…
THE PROCESS WORK
USING THE PDCA
METHODOLOGY
DESCRIBED IN TS-16949
TECHNICAL
SPECIFICATION.

DEFINED
PROCESSES
HAS THE SUPPLIER IMPLEMENTED CONTROL NUMBERS,
INCLUDED AS PART
2.1 2 AND CONTROLLED IT'S DEFINED
OF THE QUALITY
SAME FORMATTING FOR
PROCESSES? EACH DEFINED PROCESS
MANAGEMENT
SYSTEM

AN OVERALL SEARCH FOR INPUTS AND

METHOD / MAP / OUTPUTS BETWEEN
HAS THE SUPPLIER DEFINED THE
FLOW DIAGRAM INDIVIDUAL DEFINED
2.1 3 PROCESSES INTERACTIONS AND
THAT SHOWS ALL PROCESSES. LINKAGE
LINKAGES?
DEFINED BETWEEN FMEA, FLOW
PROCESSES DIAGRAM AND PCP

DOES THE SUPPLIER MONITOR

ACTUAL RECORD MANAGEMENT REVIEW
2.1 4 DEFINED PROCESSES FOR
OF ANALYSIS RECORDS
EFFECTIVENESS

TRAINING
RECORDS, WELL
DEFINED MAPPING
OF THEIR RECENT TRAINING THAT
DOES THE SUPPPLIER HAVE AN
PROCESS, VERBAL INCLUDES APPLICABLE
2.1 5 UNDERSTANDING OF PROCESS
EXPLANATION REQUIREMENTS (i.e. ISO,
APPROACH?
THROUGH TS, ETC…)
INTERVIEWS.
MANAGEMENT
REVIEW RECORDS

3. PERFORMANCE AUDIT WORKSHEET

QUESTION: EVIDENCE
REQUIRED
LOOK FOR Score G/Y/R OBSERVATIONS

MONITORING OVER A
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS RECORDS OF PERIOD OF TIME WITH
3.1 1 MEASURING DELIVERED PART DELIVERY CONTINUAL EVALUATION
QUALITY PERFORMANCE PERFORMANCE OF PERFORMANCE
(MANAGEMENT REVIEW)

4 of 12
 MINIMUM AUTOMOTIVE QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS AUDIT Revision: 09-09-15

(MAQMSR)
MONITORING OVER A
RECORDS OF PERIOD OF TIME WITH
3.1 2 DELIVERY SCHEDULE PERFORMANCE DELIVERY CONTINUAL EVALUATION

Section from MAQMSR

PERFORMANCE OF PERFORMANCE
(MANAGEMENT REVIEW)

MONITORING OVER A
PERIOD OF TIME WITH
DOES SUPPLIER TRACK CUSTOMER RECORDS OF CONTINUAL EVALUATION
3.1 3 COMPLAINTS, INCLUDING FIELD CUSTOMER AND CORRECTIVE
RETURNS? COMPLAINTS ACTION TIMING OF
CUSTOMER ISSUES
(MANAGEMENT REVIEW)

HUNT FOR REGULARITY

OF MEASUREMENT, AND
DOES THE SUPPLIER MONITOR RECORDS OF WHEN THERE IS AN ISSUE
PERFORMANCE OF MANUFACTURING MANUFACTURING HAS THERE BEEN A
PROCESSES TO HELP ENSURE MEASUREMENTS CORRECTIVE ACTION
3.1 4 CONFORMANCE TO CUST. AS IT RELATES TO ASSIGNED, AND TRACKED
REQUIREMENTS FOR PRODUCT PRODUCT QUALITY TO CLOSURE. ALSO IS
QUALITY AND EFFIENCY? AND EFFIENCY THERE ANY EVIDENCE OF
CONTINUAL
IMPROVEMENTS.

RECORDS OF ONE STATISTICAL DATA:

OF THE CHECK TO ENSURE EACH
FOLLOWING: SHIPMENT HAD IT, AND
THAT THE DATA WAS IN
*STATISTICAL DATA TOLERANCE.
FROM SUB-
SUPPLIER INSPECTION / TEST:
ENSURE RECORDS ARE
*INSPECTION / TEST ACCURATE.
RECORDS
INCOMING PRODUCT-DOES THE 2ND OR 3RD PARTY
3.2 5 SUPPLIER HAVE EVIDENCE OF *2ND OR 3RD
PARTY
AUDITS: REVIEW
SUPPLIER CONCERNS
PROPER RECEIVING?
ASSESSMENTS OR
AUDITS/WITH GOOD
QUALITY

*EVALUATION BY A
DESIGNATED LAB

*ANOTHER METHOD
AGREED BY THE
CUSTOMER

DOES THE SUPPLIER TRACK THEIR

FREQUENCY OF
3.3 6 SUPPLIERS' DELIVERED PRODUCT RECORDS
DELIVERY VS. TRACKER
CONFORMITY?

DOES THE SUPPLIER TRACK THEIR

FREQUENCY OF
3.3 7 SUPPLIERS' DELIVERY PERFORMANCE RECORDS
DELIVERY VS. TRACKER
(PREMIUM FRIEGHT)?
SHOULD BE
DOES THE SUPPLIER TRACK ISSUES
SEGREGATED WITHIN OR
INVOLVING THEIR SUPPLIERS FOR
3.3 8 CUSTOMER COMPLAINTS INCLUDING
RECORDS SEPARATE FROM THE
REST OF THE CUSTOMER
FIELD RETURNS?
CONCERNS

IS THERE EVIDENCE THAT THE

SUPPLIER PROMOTES THEIR SUB- EVIDENCE OF SUPPLIER
3.3 9 SUPPLIER TO SELF ASSESS IT'S
RECORDS
REVIEWS
PROCESSES?
LOOK FOR EVIDENCE OF
SUPPLIER HAS A DEFINED PROBLEM PROCEDURE /
3.4 10 SOLVING PROCESS? INSTRUCTIONS
5 WHY, CAUSE & EFFECT,
ETC…

CUSTOMER
DESIGNATED
WHEN REQUIRED BY CUSTOMER IS
FORMAT AS A CUSTOMER SPECIFIC
3.4 11 THE PROPER CORRECTIVE ACTION
RECORD TO REQUIREMENT
FORM USED?
INCLUDE ONLINE
ENTRIES

4. INTERNAL AUDITING AUDIT WORKSHEET

EVIDENCE
QUESTION:
REQUIRED
LOOK FOR Score G/Y/R OBSERVATIONS

5 of 12
 MINIMUM AUTOMOTIVE QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS AUDIT Revision: 09-09-15

(MAQMSR)
Q.M.S. AUDIT - SUPPLIER AUDITS THE EVIDENCE THAT QMS
RECORDS OF
4.1 1 QMS REQUIREMENTS FOR SUB-
AUDITS
AUDITS ARE MANAGED AT
SUPPLIERS? SUB-TIER SUPPLIERS

Section from MAQMSR

RECORDS OF BE SURE TO CHECK THAT
AUDITS - ARE ALL MANUFACTURING
MANUF. PROCESS AUDIT-HAS THE APPLICABLE CQI PROCESSES HAVE BEEN
4.2 2 SUPPLIER AUDITED EACH OF THEIR SELF- AUDITED i.e. MOLDING,
MANF. PROCESSES? ASSESSMETNS ASSEMBLY, BRAZING,
COMPLETED AND WELDING, FLOCKING,
CURRENT? ETC…

ENSURE THAT ALL

PRODUCT
PRODUCT AUDIT- IS THE SUPPLIER
REQUIREMENTS SUCH AS
AUDITING PRODUCT AT APPROPRIATE
RECORDS OF DIMENSIONS,
4.3 3 STAGES OF PRODUCTION AND
AUDITS FUNCTIONALITY,
DELIVERY TO VERIFY
PACKAGING AND
CONFORMANCE?
LABELING CONFORM AT
DEFINED FREQUENCIES.

CHECK FOR ALL

PROCESSES TO BE
CAPTURED ON PLAN,
ALSO ALL SHIFTS, AND
DOES THE SUPPLIER HAVE AN THAT WHEN
4.4 4 ANNUAL AUDIT PLAN THAT COVERS AUDIT PLAN INTERNAL/EXTERNAL
ALL APPLICABLE QMS PROCESSES? NONCONFORMITIES
OCCUR THAT THE AUDIT
PLAN IS REVISED /
INCREASED
APPROPRIATELY

EXTERNAL OR INTERNAL
DOES THE SUPPLIER HAVE QUALIFIED TRAINING (INTERNAL
AUDITOR TRAINING
4.5 5 AUDITORS THAT CAN AUDIT ISO-9001
RECORDS
SHOULD MEET YOUR
AND MAQMSR? CUSTOMERS SPECIFIC
REQUIREMENTS)

5. CONTROL OF NON-CONFORMING PRODUCT AUDIT WORKSHEET

QUESTION:
EVIDENCE
REQUIRED
LOOK FOR Score G/Y/R OBSERVATIONS

DOES THE SUPPLIER LABEL ANY ALL SUSPECT MATERIAL

APPROPRIATE
5.1 1 UNIDENTIFIED OR SUSPECT PRODUCT
IDENTIFICATION
CONTROLLED AND
AS NON-CONFORMING? IDENTIFIED

FIND ANY REWORK

AREAS AND CHECK FOR
INSTRUCTIONS, ALERTS /
DEVIATIONS FORMS CAN
ARE INSTRUCTIONS FOR REWORK BE USED FOR THIS
REWORK
5.2 2 INCLUDING RE-INSPECTION
INSTRUCTIONS
PURPOSE. AFTER
REQUIREMENTS ACCESSIBLE ? REWORK IS COMPLETED
IS THE REWORKED
PRODUCT INSPECTED BY
AN INDEPENDENT
EMPLOYEE(S)?

IF THE CUSTOMER HAS

BEEN CONTACTED THEN
DOES / HAS THE SUPPLIER THERE SHOULD ALWAYS
5.3 3 CONTACTED THE CUSTOMER WHEN RECORDS BE A RECORD OF THAT
N/C PRODUCT HAS BEEN SHIPPED? EVENT. MAY BE
RECORDED IN A
CUSTOMER 8D

IF THE CUSTOMER HAS

IS A CUSTOMER WAIVER OBTAINED
BEEN CONTACTED THEN
WHEN PRODUCT / MANUF. PROCESS
5.4 4 IS DIFFERENT FROM WHAT WAS
RECORDS THERE SHOULD ALWAYS
BE A RECORD OF THAT
PPAPed?
EVENT.

IF THE CUSTOMER HAS

IS A RECORD MAINTAINED OF BEEN CONTACTED THEN
5.4 5 EXPIRATION DATE OR QUANTITY RECORDS THERE SHOULD ALWAYS
AUTHORIZED? BE A RECORD OF THAT
EVENT.

6 of 12
 MINIMUM AUTOMOTIVE QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS AUDIT Revision: 09-09-15

(MAQMSR)

IS MATERIAL THAT IS SHIIPPED ON A EVIDENCE CAN BE

Section from MAQMSR

CUSTOMER WAIVER/AUTHORIZATION PROCEDURE / FOUND IN PAST
5.4 6 PROPERLY IDENTIFIED ON EACH INSTRUCTIONS CUSTOMER 8Ds, EMAILS
CONTAINER? ETC

DOES SUPPLIERS APPROVE PROCEDURE /

WRITTEN COMMUNIQUE'
5.4 7 DEVIATIONS/WAIVERS FROM THEIR INSTRUCTIONS
OR SUPPLIER 8Ds, ETC…
SUB-SUPPLIERS? ALSO RECORDS

6. PART APPROVAL AUDIT WORKSHEET

QUESTION:
EVIDENCE
REQUIRED
LOOK FOR Score G/Y/R OBSERVATIONS

PROCEDURE /
INSTRUCTION.
PRODUCT APPROVAL PROCESS -
CUSTOMER
DOES THE SUPPLIER FOLLOW AN APPROVED / SIGNED OFF
6.1 1 APPROVAL PROCESS RECOGNIZED
SPECIFIC
APPROVAL PACKAGE(S)
REQUIREMENTS VS.
BY THE CUSTOMER?
APPROVAL
PACKAGE

ENGINEERING SPECIFICATIONS-DOES PROCEDURE

SUPPLIER HAVE A PROCESS TO /INSTRUCTION / EMAILS, LOGS WITH
6.2 2 ASSURE THE TIMELY REVIEW, LOG OF EXTERNAL DATES RECEIVED VS.
DISTRIBUTION, IMPLEMENTATION OF CUSTOMER IMPLEMENTED
CUST. ENGINEERING SPECIFICATION? DOCUMENTATION

CHECK QUALITY
DOES THE SUPPLIER RECORD WHEN
DOCUMENTATION
6.2 3 CHANGES ARE IMPLEMENTED IN RECORDS
VERSUS THE CHANGE AS
PRODUCTION
APPLICABLE.

MONITORING AND MEASUREMENT OF IDENTIFY ALL

MANUFACTURING PROCESSES- IS MANUFACTURING
THERE EVIDENCE TO SHOW THAT THE CAPABILITY PROCESSES, AND THEN
6.3 4 SUPPLIER PERFORMS CAP STUDIES STUDIES VERIFY THAT CAP
ON ALL APPLICABLE MANUFACTURING STUDIES EXIST FOR
PROCESSES? EACH PROCESS.

SHOULD BE EQUAL OR
HAS THE SUPPLIER MAINTAINED SAID GREATER TO CAP STUDY
6.3 5 CAP STUDY RESULTS?
SPC RECORDS
RESULTS OF INITIAL PPAP
PACKAGE.

CONTROL PLAN WALK THE CONTROL

ARE CONTROL PLANS FOLLOWED AND APPROVALS, TEAM PLAN AND VERIFY
6.3 6 ACCURATE ? MEMBERS, PSW ACCURACY VS. CURRENT
SIGN-OFFS PROCESS.

USE CHANGE LOG /

RECORD AND VERIFY TO
CAP STUDIES ON HAND.
ARE CAP STUDIES DONE AFTER (PPAP CAP STUDIES AT
6.3 7 ANY/ALL PRODUCT / PROCESS RECORDS MIN SHOULD BE
CHANGES? RETAINED FOR LIFE OF
PROGRAM INCLUDING
SERVICE PLUS ONE
YEAR.)

DURING A CONTROL
PLAN WALK THROUGH
VERIFY ANY
DIFFERENCES FROM
RECORDS AVAILABLE SHOWING CONTROL PLAN. REVIEW
6.3 8 EFFECTIVE DATES OF PROCESS CHANGE RECORDS INITIAL PPAP VS
CHANGES? CURRENT CONTROL
PLAN, THEN TAKE THAT
INFORMATION AND
CHECK THAT AGAINST
KNOWN CHANGES.

HAS THE APPROPRIATE MSA

CALIBRATION/
METHODOLOGY BEEN USED ON ALL
6.4 9 MEASUREMENT/TEST EQUIPMENT
VERIFICATION REVIEW MSA RECORDS
RECORDS
AFFECTING PRODUCT QUALITY?

7 of 12
 MINIMUM AUTOMOTIVE QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS AUDIT Revision: 09-09-15

(MAQMSR)
CALIBRATION/VERIFICATION FOR ALL SAMPLE DURING
MEASUREMENT EQUIPMENT, CONTROL PLAN WALK
6.5 10 INCLUDING EMPLOYEE AND
RECORDS
THROUGH. THEN MATCH

Section from MAQMSR

CUSTOMER OWNED? TO RECORDS.
IS MEASUREMENT EQUIPMENT
CALIBRATED TO ESTABLISHED RECORDS * UNIQUE EQUIPMENT
STANDARDS? IDENTIFICATION (TO
INCLUDE MEASUREMENT
STANDARD AGAINST
WHICH THE EQUIPMENT
IS CALIBRATED)

6.5 11 *STATEMENTS OF
CONFORMITY TO
SPECIFICATION AFTER
CAL. / VER. AND
NOTIFICATION TO
CUSTOMER IF SUSPECT
PRODUCT OR MATERIAL
WAS SHIPPED.

8 of 12
 MINIMUM AUTOMOTIVE QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS AUDIT Revision: 09-09-15

(MAQMSR)

7. MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITY AUDIT WORKSHEET

Section from MAQMSR

QUESTION: EVIDENCE
REQUIRED
LOOK FOR Score G/Y/R OBSERVATIONS

IS THERE A SCHEDULED SUPPLIER

MANAGEMENT
TOP MANAGEMENT REVIEW OF
REVIEW & CONFORMITY OR
7.1 1 PRODUCT REALIZATION PROCESSES
INTERNAL AND CORRECTIVE ACTION
TO ASSURE THEIR EFFECTIVENESS
EXTERNAL AUDITS
AND EFFICIENCY?

ARE QUALITY OBJECTIVES AND THE LOOK TO SEE IF THE

INTERVIEWS AND
OVERALL QUALITY POLICY QUALITY POLICY IS
7.2 2 COMMUNICATED AND UNDERSTOOD
LEVEL ONE
POSTED IN MULTIPLE
DOCUMENTATION
THROUGHOUT THE ORGANIZATION? AREAS.

CAN BE AN AUTOMATED
IS SUPPLIER MANAGEMENT
SYSTEM OR EMAIL.
CONTACTED WHENEVER PROCESS
SHOULD BE
7.3 3 OR PRODUCT DOES NOT CONFORM RECORDS
COMPLIMENTED WITH
AND THERE IS A RISK OF SHIPPING
DOCUMENTATION
NON-CONFORMING PRODUCT?
SUPPORTING PRACTICE

HAS THE SUPPLIER IDENTIFIED WHO PROCEDURE / INTERVIEW SEVERAL

7.3 4 CAN STOP PRODUCTION ? INSTRUCTION PERSONNEL

DOES THE SUPPLIER HAVE

PROCEDURE/
PERSONNEL ON ALL SHIFTS THAT
7.3 5 ENSURE CONFORMITY TO PRODUCT
INSTRUCTION/ INTERVIEW
JOB DESCRIPTION
REQUIREMENTS?

HAS SUPPLIER DELEGATED

ORGANIZATIONAL USUALLY QUALITY
RESPONSIBILITY AND AUTHORITY TO
7.4 6 SOMEONE TO ENSURE CUSTOMER
CHART / JOB MANAGER BUT NOT
DESCRIPTION NECESSARILY
REQUIREMENTS ARE ADDRESSED?

9 of 12
 MINIMUM AUTOMOTIVE QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS AUDIT Revision: 09-09-15

(MAQMSR)

DOES QMS REVIEWS, AT A MINIMUM,

SEE MANAGEMENT

Section from MAQMSR

INCLUDE QUALITY OBJECTIVES AND
7.5 7 CUSTOMER SATISFACTION WITH
RECORDS REVIEWS FOR SAID
RECORDS
PRODUCT SUPPLIED?

DOES MANAGEMENT REVIEW HAVE SEE MANAGEMENT

7.5.1 8 AN INPUT OF POTENTIAL AND ACTUAL RECORDS REVIEWS FOR SAID
FIELD FAILURES? RECORDS

SHOULD BE PART OF THE

DOES THE SUPPLIER HAVE ROBUST PROCEDURE / CONTROLLED QMS.
7.5.2 9 CONTINGENCY PLANS? INSTRUCTION CHECK FOR ALL
POTENTIAL SCENARIOS.

DOES THE SUPPLIER CONFORM TO

ALL REQUIREMENTS OF CONTROL
USE THE MAQMSR OR TS-
ANNEX 10 PLAN AS STATED IN THE ANNEX OF CONTROL PLANS
16949 TO CROSS CHECK.
MAQMSR AND BACK SECTION OF TS-
16949?

10 of 12
 MINIMUM AUTOMOTIVE QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS AUDIT
(MAQMSR)

SUPPLIER PLANT AUDIT

NAME: MANAGER: DATE:

SUPPLIER QUALITY AUDITOR

LOCATION: MANAGER: NAME:

MAQMSR SUPPLIER AUDIT

1. CONTROL PLANS 5. CONTROL OF NON-CONFORMING PRODUCT
0 DEVELOP CONTROL PLANS AT THE SYSTEM, SUBSYSTEM,COMPONENT? 0 5.1) DOES THE SUPPLIER LABEL ANY UNIDENTIFIED OR SUSPECT PRODUCT AS NON-CONFORMING?
0 FOR PRELAUNCH AND PRODUCTION? 0 5.2) INSTRUCTIONS FOR REWORK INCLUDING RE-INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS ARE ACCESSIBLE ?
0 LIST CONTROLS FOR MANUFACTURING PROCESS? 0 5.3) DOES / HAS THE SUPPLIER CONTACTED THE CUSTOMER WHEN N/C PRODUCT HAS BEEN SHIPPED?
0 INCLUDE METHODS FOR MONITORING FOR SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS? 5.4) IS A CUSTOMER WAIVER OBTAINED WHEN PRODUCT / MANUF. PROCESS IS DIFFERENT FROM WHAT
0
0 INCLUDE CUSTOMER-REQUIRED INFO.(IF APPLICABLE)? WAS PPAPed?
0 INITIATE REACTION PLAN WHEN PROCESS IS UNSTABLE OR STATISTICALLY OUT 0 IS A RECORD MAINTAINED OF EXPIRATION DATE OR QUANTITY AUTHORIZED?
0 1.2) WORK INSTRUCTIONS ARE AVAILABLE AND ARE DERIVED FROM I.E. CONTROL PLAN MATERIAL SHIPPED ON A CUSTOMER WAIVER/AUTHORIZATION GET PROPER IDENTIFICATION ON EACH
0
0 1.3) JOB SET-UPS ARE VERIFIED, WORK INSTRUCTIONS FOR SET-UP ARE THERE CONTAINER?
0 1.4) ARE THERE PLANNED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES? 0 DOES SUPPLIERS APPROVE DEVIATIONS/WAIVERS FROM THEIR SUB-SUPPLIERS?

0 ARE PACKAGING, AND PRESEVATION OF EQUIPMENT TOOLING AND GAUGES IN PLACE? 0 Total Potential 21 0%
0 ARE SPARE PARTS AVAILABLE FOR KEY EQUIPMENT?
0 DOES MAINTENANCE HAVE WRITTEN OBJECTIVES, THAT ARE EVALUATED AND IMPROVED ON?

0 1.5) I.D. & TRACEABILITY: ARE ALL PRODUCT IDENTIFIED BY SUITABLE MEANS? 6. PART APPROVAL
0 HAS THE SUPPLIER IDENTIFIED PRODUCT STATUS WITH RESPECT TO INPECTION CHECKS? 6.1) PRODUCT APPROVAL PROCESS - DOES THE SUPPLIER FOLLOW
0
0 WHERE TRACEABILITY IS A REQUIREMENT, DOES THE SUPPLIER MAINTAIN RECORDS? AN APPROVAL PROCESS RECOGNIZED BY THE CUSTOMER?

0 Total Potential 45 0% 6.2) ENGINEERING SPECIFICATIONS-DOES SUPPLIER HAVE A PROCESS TO

0 ASSURE THE TIMELY REVIEW, DISTRIBUTION, IMPLEMENTATION

OF CUST. ENGINEERING SPECIFICATION

2. PROCESS APPROACH 0 DOES THE SUPPLIER RECORD WHEN CHANGES ARE IMPLEMENTED IN PRODUCTION
0 HAS THE SUPPLIER DEFINED IT'S PROCESSES AND SUB-PROCESSES? 6.3) MONITORING AND MEASUREMENT OF MANUFACTURING PROCESSES-
0 HAS THE SUPPLIER IMPLEMENTED AND CONTROLLED IT'S DEFINED PROCESSES? 0 IS THERE EVIDENCE TO SHOW THAT THE SUPPLIER PERFORMS CAP STUDIES
0 HAS THE SUPPLIER DEFINED THE PROCESSES INTERACTIONS AND LINKAGES? ON ALL MANUFACTURING PROCESSES?
0 DOES THE SUPPLIER MONITOR SAID PROCESSES FOR "EFFECTIVENESS 0 HAS THE SUPPLIER MAINTAINED SAID CAP STUDY RESULTS?
0 DOES THE SUPPPLIER HAVE AN UNDERSTANDING OF PROCESS APPROACH? 0 ARE CONTROL PLANS FOLLOWED AND ACCURATE ?

0 Total Potential 15 0% 0 ARE CAP STUDIES DONE AFTER ANY/ALL PRODUCT / PROCESS CHANGES?
0 RECORDS AVAILABLE SHOWING EFFECTIVE DATES OF PROCESS CHANGES?
0 6.4) MSA-HAS THERE BEEN STATISTICAL STUDIES COMPLETED FOR I.M.T.E.?

3. PERFORMANCE 0 6.5) CALIBRATION/VERIFICATION RECORDS EXIST FOR ALL IMTE

0 3.1) PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: DELIVERED PART QUALITY PERFORMANCE TRACKED? INCLUDING EMPLOYEE AND CUSTOMER OWNED?
0 SUPPLIER TRACK DELIVERY SCHEDULE PERFORMANCE INCLUDING PREMIUM FREIGHT? 0 ARE ALL THE REQUIREMENTS AS SEEN IN 6.5 OF MAQMSR?
0 DOES SUPPLIER TRACK CUSTOMER COMPLAINTS, INCLUDING FIELD RETURNS? 6.6) CHANGE CONTROL- HAS THE SUPPLIER A PROCESS TO CONTROL AND
#NAME?
DOES THE SUPPLIER MONITOR PERFORMANCE OF MANUFACTURING PROCESSES TO HELP REACT TO CHANGES TO PRODUCT REALIZATION
0
ENSURE CONFORMANCE TO CUST. REQUIREMENTS FOR PRODUCT QUALITY AND EFFIENCY? 6.7) CHANGE CONTROL NOTIFICATION-IS THERE EVIDENCE THAT THE
0 3.2) INCOMING PRODUCT-DOES THE SUPPLIER HAVE EVIDENCE OF PROPER RECEIVING? #NAME? SUPPLIER CONTACTS THE CUSTOMER WHENEVER THERE IS A CHANGE LIKE
0 3.3) DOES THE SUPPLIER TRACK THEIR SUPPLIERS' DELIVERED PRODUCT CONFORMITY? IN 6.6?

0 DOES THE SUPPLIER TRACK THEIR SUPPLIERS' DELIVERY PERFORMANCE (PREMIUM FRIEGHT)? #NAME? Total Potential 39 ###
DOES THE SUPPLIER TRACK ISSUES INVOLVING THEIR SUPPLIERS FOR CUSTOMER COMPLAINTS
0
INCLUDING FIELD RETURNS?

0 IS THERE EVIDENCE THAT THE SUPPLIER PROMOTES THEIR SUB-SUPPLIER TO SELF ASSESS 7. MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITY
IT'S PROCESSES? 7.1) PROCESS MONITORING-SUPPLIER TOP MANAGEMENT REVIEW
0
0 3.4) SUPPLIER HAS A DEFINED PROBLEM SOLVING PROCESS? PRODUCT REALIZATION TO ASSURE THEIR EFFECTIVENESS AND EFFICIENCY?
0 WHEN REQUIRED BY CUSTOMER IS THE PROPER CORRECTIVE ACTION FORM USED? 7.2) QUALITY OBJECTIVES AND QUALITY POLICY RELATE AND PROPERLY
0
0 Total Potential 33 0% DEPLOYED?
7.3) SUPPLIER MANAGEMENT CONTACTED WHENEVER PROCESS OR
0
PRODUCT DOES NOT CONFORM?

4. INTERNAL AUDITS 0 HAS THE SUPPLIER IDENTIFIED WHO CAN STOP PRODUCTION ?
0 4.1) Q.M.S. AUDIT - SUPPLIER AUDITS THE QMS REQUIREMENTS FOR SUB-SUPPLIERS? DOES THE SUPPLIER HAVE PERSONNEL ON ALL SHIFTS THAT ENSURE
0
0 4.2) MANUF. PROCESS AUDIT-HAS THE SUPPLIER AUDITED EACH OF THEIR MANF. PROCESSES? CONFORMITY TO PRODUCT REQUIREMENTS?
0 4.3) PRODUCT AUDIT- THE SUPPLIER AUDITING PRODUCT AT APPROPRIATE STAGES OF PRODUCTION AND DELIVERY
7.4) TO
HASVERIFY
SUPPLIER
CONFORMANCE?
DELEGATED RESPONSIBILITY AND AUTHORITY
0
0 4.4) SUPPLIER HAVE AN ANNUAL AUDIT PLAN THAT COVERS ALL APPLICABLE QMS PROCESSES? TO SOMEONE TO ENSURE CUSTOMER REQUIREMENTS ARE ADDRESSED?
0 4.5) DOES THE SUPPLIER HAVE QUALIFIED AUDITORS THAT CAN AUDIT ISO-9001 AND MAQMSR? 7.5) QMS REVIEWS AT A MINIMUM INCLUDE QUALITY OBJECTIVES
0
0 Total Potential 15 0% AND CUSTOMER SATISFACTION WITH PRODUCT SUPPLIED?
7.5.1) DOES MANAGEMENT REVIEW HAVE AN INPUT OF POTENTIAL AND
0
ACTUAL FIELD FAILURES?
0 7.5.2) DOES THE SUPPLIER HAVE ROBUST CONTINGENCY PLANS?
ANNEX - DOES THE SUPPLIER CONFORM TO ALL REQUIREMENTS OF
0
CONTROL PLAN AS STATED IN THE ANNEX OF MAQMSR?

0 Potential 30 0%

Pts
% Awarded
Pts Available Summary Status
0% 0 45 CONTROL PLANS RED 0 Supplier can not demonstrate compliance to an existing practice.
0% 0 15 PROCESS APPROACH RED 1 Supplier has an incomplete or not fully implemented process.
0% 0 33 PERFORMANCE RED 2 Supplier can not demonstrate full compliance.
0% 0 15 INTERNAL AUDITING RED
3 Supplier has a complete documented process and can
0% 0 21 CONTROL OF NON-CONFORMING PRODUCT RED demonstrate full compliance.
#NAME? #NAME? 39 PART APPROVAL #NAME? N/A Not applicable
0% 0 30 MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITY RED
#NAME? #NAME? 198 Overall #NAME? 85% Green
Summary Scoring: #NAME? 60-85% Yellow
<59% Red