The document discusses key provisions of Pakistan's Qanun-e-Shahadat Order (QSO) regarding evidence law. Some key points include:
- QSO repealed the Evidence Act of 1872 and applies to all courts except arbitrators. It covers oral evidence, documentary evidence, and the definition of facts.
- Article 3 discusses competency of witnesses, excluding those prevented by age, illness, or lunacy (unless lunacy does not prevent understanding questions).
- Various articles establish privileges for judges, married persons, and advocates to not disclose certain confidential information.
- Accomplices are competent witnesses against the accused except in Hudood cases. Financial documents require two male or
The document discusses key provisions of Pakistan's Qanun-e-Shahadat Order (QSO) regarding evidence law. Some key points include:
- QSO repealed the Evidence Act of 1872 and applies to all courts except arbitrators. It covers oral evidence, documentary evidence, and the definition of facts.
- Article 3 discusses competency of witnesses, excluding those prevented by age, illness, or lunacy (unless lunacy does not prevent understanding questions).
- Various articles establish privileges for judges, married persons, and advocates to not disclose certain confidential information.
- Accomplices are competent witnesses against the accused except in Hudood cases. Financial documents require two male or
The document discusses key provisions of Pakistan's Qanun-e-Shahadat Order (QSO) regarding evidence law. Some key points include:
- QSO repealed the Evidence Act of 1872 and applies to all courts except arbitrators. It covers oral evidence, documentary evidence, and the definition of facts.
- Article 3 discusses competency of witnesses, excluding those prevented by age, illness, or lunacy (unless lunacy does not prevent understanding questions).
- Various articles establish privileges for judges, married persons, and advocates to not disclose certain confidential information.
- Accomplices are competent witnesses against the accused except in Hudood cases. Financial documents require two male or
The document discusses key provisions of Pakistan's Qanun-e-Shahadat Order (QSO) regarding evidence law. Some key points include:
- QSO repealed the Evidence Act of 1872 and applies to all courts except arbitrators. It covers oral evidence, documentary evidence, and the definition of facts.
- Article 3 discusses competency of witnesses, excluding those prevented by age, illness, or lunacy (unless lunacy does not prevent understanding questions).
- Various articles establish privileges for judges, married persons, and advocates to not disclose certain confidential information.
- Accomplices are competent witnesses against the accused except in Hudood cases. Financial documents require two male or
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 15
QANOON-E-SHAHADAT ORDER MCQS
1. The Qanun shadat order is the President’s order 10 of 1984.
2. QSO has repealed the evidence act 1872. 3. Under Article 1 , QSO applies to all courts and tribunals except before an Arbitrator. 4. Article 2 relates to interpretation clause. 5. Document means any matter expressed or described upon any substance by means of letters, figures or marks. 6. All the statements which the court permits or requires to be made before it by witness , in relation to matters of fact under inquiry , such statements are called oral evidence. 7. All the documents produced for the inspection of Court are called documentary evidence. 8. Facts, includes anything , state of thing , or relation of things capable of being perceived by senses, and any mental condition of which any person is conscious. 9. Fact in issue includes any fact from which either by itself or in connection with other facts , the existence or non-existance nature of extent of any right , liability or disability asserted or denied in any suit or proceedings necessarily follows. 10. Under Article 3 , all persons are competent to satisfy , who understand the question and give rational answers unless they are prevented by tender years, extreme old age, disease of body or mind. 11. A lunatic is not incompetent unless his lunacy is prevented by his lunacy from understanding the questions put to him. 12. Under Article 4, no judge or magistrate can be compelled to answer as to his own conduct as a judge or anything in his knowledge as a judge. 13. Under Article 5, no person who is married to other, can be compelled to answer anything, nor he be permitted unless consent is given. 14. Under Article 6, no person shall be permitted to give any evidence derived from any unpublished official record relating to any affairs of state, except with the permission of officer of Court. 15. official records of affairs of state includes documents concerning industrial or commercial activities carried on, directly or indirectly by fedral govt or provincial govt or any statutory body. 16. Under Article 7, no person shall be compelled to disclose official communication made to him in official confidence. 17. Under Article 8, no magistrate of police officer shall be compelled to say whence he got any information as to commission of offence and no revenue officer shall be compelled as well. 18. Under Article 9, no advocate shall be permitted to disclose any communication made to him by his client during his employment and even after ceasing of employement .this shall under article 10, apply to interpreters , clerks or servants of advocates. 19. Under Article 13, no witness who is not a party to suit be compelled to produce his title deed to any property or any document which he holds it as a pledge or mortgagee or production of any document which might tend to incriminate him unless he has agreed upon it. 20. Under Article 15, no witness be excused from answering on ground that answer will criminate him. 21. no such answer shall be proved against him except to prosecute by giving false evidence. 22. Under Article 16, an accomplice shall be a competent witness against an accused person except in the case of offence punishable with Hadd. 23. An accomplice means a person who has taken part in the commission of offence either directly or indirectly. 24. The competency and number of witnesses is provided in Article 17 of the Constitution of Pakistan. 25. under Article 17, the competence and number of witnesses shall be determined in accordance with the injunctions of Holy Quran and Sunnah. 26. In matters pertaining to financial obligations, the instrument shall be attested by two men or one man and two women. 27. In all other matters, the court may accept the testimony of one man or one women. 28. Evidence has to be weighed and not counted. 29. Principle of purgation or tazkiyate shuhood is only applicable in hudood cases and nothing to do with tazir cases. 30. Under Article 18, evidence may be given of facts in issue and relevant facts. 31. Res- gestae means a fact which though not in issue is so connected with the fact in issue as to form part of same transaction. Res-gestai is a matter incidental to the main fact and explanatory of it. 32. Under Article 20, facts which are occasion , cause or effect of facts in issue or relevant facts which constitutes the state of things under which they happened or which afforded an opportutnity for their occurance or transaction are relevant. 33. Under Article 21, any fact is relevant which shows or constitutes a motive or preparation for any fact in issue or relevant fact is a relevant fact. 34. The conduct of any party or of any agent to any party to any suit or proceedings , or any reference to any fact in issue is relevant.\ 35. Under Article 22, facts necessary to explain or introduce relevant facts are relevant. 36. The question is whether a given document is the will of A.The state of A,s property and his family at the date of Alleged will may be relevant facts. 37. Identification parade is provided under Article 22 of Qanun shahadat Order. 38. Under Article 24, facts not other wise relevant becomes relevant , if they are inconsistent with any fact in issue or relevant fact and if in connection with other facts they make the existence or non-existance of any fact in issue or relevant fact highly probable or improbable. 39. The Question whether A committed crime on Friday at peshawer . the fact that on Friday he was at Quetta is a relevant fact. 40. Under Article 25, in suit for damages facts tending to enable court to determine amount are relevant. 41. Under Article 26, facts are relevant when right or custom is in question. 42. Under Article 27, facts showing the existence of state of mind , or body , or bodily feelings , such as intention , knowledge, good faith negligence, rashness are relevant when the existence of any such thing is fact in issue or relevant. 43. Admission is defined under Article 30 of QSO, which means a statement, oral or documentary, which suggests any inference as to any fact in issue or relevant fact, and which is made by any of the person . 44. Admission can be relevant but it is not a conclusive proof of fact which can be proved to be incorrect or to have been erroneously made. 45. Admission of one person is not binding on another person. 46. Under Article 31 , statements made by a party to the proceedings, or by an agent to any such party authorized by him to make such admissions are admissions. 47. Statements made by parties to suits suing or sued in a representative character are not admissions unless they were made while the party making them held that character. 48. Admissions made by a party having interests in property are admissions if they are made in the continuance of the interest of persons making statements. 49. Admissions of a party in earlier litigations cannot be used in subsequent proceedings . 50. Under Article 33 , the statements made by persons to whom a party to suit has expressly reffered for information in reference to matter in dispute are admissions. 51. The question whether a Horse sold by A to B is sound . A says to B : Go and ask C ; C knows all about it . C,s statement is an admission. 52. Under Article 34 , admission can be proved by or on behalf of person making it , if it is relevant otherwise as an admission. 53. Under Article 35, oral admissions as to the contents of document are not relevant, unless and until the party proposing to prove them shows that he is entitled to give secondary evidence of the contents of such document. 54. Under Article 36, In civil cases no admission is relevant , if it is made with the express condition that evidence of it is not to be given. 55. Under Article 37, a confession made by the accused is irrelevant , if it appears to the court that it has been induced by some threat, or promise or inducement. 56. Retracted confession is immaterial once it is found that it was voluntarily as well as true. 57. Extra judicial confession is the weak type of confession and it cannot be relied without any independent corroboration. 58. Under Article 38, no confession made to a police officer be proved as against the accused person. 59. Under Article 39, confession made by the accused person while in the custody of police is inadmissible, unless it is made in the presence of a magistrate. 60. Under Article 40, only to such extent of the discovery made on the information of accused , by the police be proved as confession. 61. Confession made before police officer is not admissible, but Article 40 is an exception to Article 37, and 39. 62. Under Article 41 , if the confession is made after the removel of an impression of threat, inducement and promise , becomes relevant. 63. Under Article 42, if a confession is otherwise relevant, it doesnot become irrelevant merely because it was made under a promise of secrecy , or when he was drunk, or it was made in answer to questions which he need not have answered or because he was not warned that he was not bound to make such confessions . 64. Under Article 43, when more than one persons are jointly tried for an offence and one of them make confession, such confession is a proof against the person making it , and the court may take into consideration such confession as circumstantial evidence against other person. 65. Under Article 44, all the accused persons , including an accomplice , shall be liable to cross-examination. 66. Under Article 45, admissions are not conclusive proof , but thay may operate as estoppels . 67. Under Article 46, statements , oral or written of relevant facts made by a person who is dead , or who cannot be found are themselves relevant facts 1.) when it relates to the cause of death. 2) or when made in the course of business . 3) or when made against the interest of maker 4). Or gives opinion as to public right or customs, or matters of general interest. 68. Dying declaration is a statement made by a person as to the cause of death or as to the circumstances of transaction resulting in his death. 69. Dying declaration is a substantive piece of evidence and is an exception to the hearsay rule. 70. Dying declaration is a weaker type of evidence which needs corroboration. 71. Under Article 46-A , statements in the form of electronic documents generated , received, or recorded by an automated system while it is in working order , are relevant.it can be considered as a primary evidence. 72. Article 47 provides that, the evidence given by a witness in a judicial proceedings is relevant in a subsequent proceedings or at later stage in same proceedings , if the proceedings were between the same parties and same question was in issue in former proceedings.\ 73. Under Article 48, enteries in the books of account are relevant when kept in the course of business . 74. Under Article 54, the judgment, order or decree which by law prevents a court from taking cognizance of a suit or holding a trial is relevant fact when the question is whether such court ought to take cognizance or not. 75. Judgement in REM means any judgement wherein any question of law has been decided. 76. A sues B for trespass on his Land , B alleges the existence of a public right of way over the Land , which A denies. The existence of a decree in favour of defendant , in a suit by A against C for a trespass on the same Land , in which C alleged the existence of same right of way , is relevant, but not the conclusive proof that the right of way exists. 77. The opinion of experts under Article 59 of QSO are relevant facts. , the usage of particular words in a district or by a class of people is relevant. 78. The question whether A is a legitimate son of B. the fact that A was always treated as such by members of family, is relevant. 79. Under Article 66, in civil cases , the conduct of an individual is irrelevant unless it is a fact in issue. 80. Under Article 67, In criminal cases, the fact that that the accused person is of a Good Character is relevant. 81. Under Article 68, in criminal proceedings , the fact that the accused person has a bad character is irrelevant, unless it is given in reply to the statement that he has a good character. 82. In criminal proceedings , a previous conviction is relevant as to the evidence of Bad character. 83. The word character includes both reputation and disposition. 84. Under Article 69, In civil cases , the fact that the character of any person is such as to effect the amount of damages which he ought to receive is relevant. 85. Article 70, provides that, all facts except the contents of documents may be proved by the oral evidence. 86. Under Article 71, Oral evidence must in all cases whatever be direct. 87. if a witness is dead or is uncapable to be produced without delay, then the parties shall have right to produce SHAHADAH ALA SHAHADAH , by which a witness can appoint two witnesses to depose on his behalf , except in case of Hudood. 88. Article 72 provides that: oral evidence of a document must be proved either by primary or secondary evidence. 89. Under Article 73 of QSO, Primary evidence means the document itself produced for the inspection of the Court. 90. Where a document is produced in several parts, each part is considered as a primary evidence of the document. 91. where a number of documents are all made of uniform process , as in case of printing , lithography or photo graphy , each is a primary evidence of the contents of the rest, but where they are all the copies of a common original , they are not primary evidence of the contents of original. 92. All prints out and other generated automated information system be treated as primary evidence. 93. Under Article 74, secondary evidence means certified copies , copies made from original by mechanical process, copies made from or compared with original , counter parts of the documents as gainst the party who did not execute them, or oral accounts of a the contents of document given by some person who has seen it himself. 94. A photograph of an original is the secondary evidence of its contents, if it is proved that the thing photographed was original. 95. Under Article 75, documents must be proved by the primary evidence. 96. Under Article 76, secondary evidence of a document may be given of the existence, condition, or contents of document, when the original is lost or is hown to be in the possession of other party, or is in bulk and cannot be produced or is not movable due to weight. 97. Under Article 85, public record kept in Pakistan of private documts are public douments. 98. judicial, executive or douments required to be maintained by the public servant under any Law and registered documents the execution whereof is not required are public documents. 99. Under Article 86, all other documents are private documents. 100. Under Article 88, certified copies of public document may be produced in proof of the contents of public documents. 101. Under Article 100, when any document purporting or proved to be thirty years old is produced from any custody which the court in a particular case considers proper, the court may presume that the handwriting, signatures are are executed by that person. 102. where there are more originals, one original need to be proved. 103. If a contract be in several letters, all the letters in which it is contained must be proved. 104. If a bill of exchange is drawn in a set of three , only one need to be proved. 105. No evidence can be given in the proof of disposition of property except document itself or secondry evidence of its contents. 106. Under Article 103, when the terms of any contract, grant or any matter required by Law to be reduced in form of document, then no evidence of any such oral agreement shall be admitted . 107. A policy of insurance is effected on goods ;; in ships from Karachi to London :: the goods are shipped in a particular ship which is lost. The fact that the particular ship was orally excepted from policy cannot be proved. 108. A agrees absolutely in writing to pay B rs.1000 on 1st march 1984.The fact that at the same time an oral agreement was made that money should not be made before 30th march, cannot be proved. 109. A sells to B by deed ;; my house in Rangpur containing 100 Bighas;; . A has an estate at Rangpur containing 100 Bighas. Evidence may not be given of the fact that the estate meant to be sold was one situated at the different place and of a different size. 110. A sells to B by deed; my House in Karachi ; .A has no house in Karachi, but it appears that he had a house at kemari , of which B had been in possession since the execution of Deed.. These facts may be proved to show that the deed related to the house in Kemari. 111. A agrees to sell to B , for 1000 ;; my white horse :: .A has two white horses . Evidence may be given of facts which shows which of them was meant. 112. Under Article 109, persons who are not party to agreement or their representative in interest, may give evidence of any fact tending to show a contemporaneous agreement varying the terms of agreement. 113. Under Article 113, no fact which court will take judicial notice need be proved. 114. Under Article 113 , facts which are admitted need not to be proved. 115. Doctrine of ESTOPPEL is incorporated in Article 114 of QSO. 116. Rule of Estoppel prevents a party from saying anything inconsistent in successive actions and prevent a party from saying anything which would contradict his own previous act. 117. Rule of Estoppel has nothing to do with criminal proceedings. 118. Under Article 117, Burden of proof lies on a person regarding the existence of certain facts , who asserts it. 119. Under Article 119, burden of proof of a particular fact lies on that person who believes the existence of a particular fact. 120. Under Article 123, when the question is whether a person is alive or dead , and it is shown that he was alive within 30 days, the burden of proving that he is dead is on the person who affirms it. 121. Under Article 126, when the question is whether any person is owner of anything of which he is shown to be in possession, the burden of proving that he is not the owner is on the person who affirms that he is not the owner. 122. Under Article 127, when there is a question as to the good faith of a transaction between the parties , the burden of proving the good faith of the transaction is on the party who is in a position of active confidence. 123. When the ggod faith of a sale by a client to an advocate is in question in a suit brought by the client . The burden of proving the good faith of transaction is on advocate. 124. Article 128 has provided the conclusive proof of the legitimacy of Birth. 125. The fact that any person was born during the continuance of a valid marriage between his mother and any person and not earlier than 6 lunar months from the date of marriage and 2 years after the dissolution of marriage , the mother remains unmarried, unless the husband has refused or refuses to own child and the child was born after the expiration of six lunar months from the date on which the women had accepted that the period of iddat has come to an end. 126. Under Article 129, the court may presume the existence of a certain facts according to the circumstances of the case. 127. Article 130 states that , the judge is to decide the admissibility of evidence. 128. Under Article 132, the examination of a witness by a party who calls him shall be called his examination in chief. 129. Under Article 132 (2 ) , the examination of a person by the Adverse Party shall be called his cross-examination. 130. Under Article 133, the examination and cross examination must relate to the relevant facts, but the cross examination cannot be confined to the facts to which the witness testified on his examination-in chief. 131. Under Article 134, a person summoned to produce a document does not become a witness by a mere fact that he produces it, and cannot be cross-examined unless and until he is called as a witness. 132. Under Article 135, witness to character may be cross-examined and re-examined. 133. Under Article 137, leading question is defined as any question suggesting to answer which the person putting it wishes or expects to receive is called a leading question. 134. Under Article 137, leading questions must not be asked in examination in chief or re-examination, except with the permission of court. 135. Under Article 138, leading questions may be asked in cross- examination. 136. A witness may give oral evidence of the statements made by other persons about the contents of documents if such statements are in themselves relevant facts. 137. Under Article 141, when a witness is cross-examined , he may be asked any question which tend to test his veracity, to discover who he is and what is his position in life, or shake his credit , by injuring his character. 138. An advocate is instructed by his attorney that an important witness is a dakait, this is a reasonable ground for asking the witness whether he is dakait. 139. A witness whom nothing is known , is asked at random whether he is a dakait . there are here no reasonable grounds for the question. 140. Under Article 148, the court may forbid any question which appears to it to be intended to insult or annoy , or which though proper in itself , appears to the court needlessly offensive in form. 141. A claim against a underwriter is resisted on the grounds of fraud .the claimant is asked whether , in a former transaction , he had not made a fraudulent claim .he denies it . evidence is offered to show that he did make such a claim . The evidence is in-admissible. 142. A witness is asked whether he was not dismissed from a situation for dishonesty . he denies it. Evidence is shown that he was dismissed for dishonesty. The evidence is not admissible. 143. A affirms that on a certain day, He saw B at Lahore . A is asked whether he himself was not on that day at Faisalabad. He denies it . Evidence is offered to show that he was at faisalabad on that day . The evidence is admissible. 144. Under Article 151, the evidence of a witness may be impeached , by the proof that a witness has been bribed and by the proff that his previous statements inconsistent with any part of evidence which is liable to be contradicted. 145. Under Article 152, Question tending to corroborate the evidence of a relevant fact is admissible. 146. Under Article 153, former statements of a witness related to the same fact at or about the time when the fact took place may be proved to corroborate the later testimony as to same fact. 147. Under Article 155, any witness may refresh his memory by referring to any writing made by him at the time of transaction . 148. Under Article 161, the judge may ask any question from any party related to the relevant facts. 149. Under Article 163, when the plaintiff takes oath in support of his claim, the court must call defendant to deny the claim on oath. 150. Under Article 164, the court may may allow any evidence that may have become available because of modern devices or techniques. 151. Under Article 164, the conviction on the basis of modern devices or techniques may be lawful. 152. The evidence act (I of 1872 ) , is hereby repealed. 153. QSO contains 166 articles in total.
The Corruption at The Los Angeles Superior Court As Lawyers Paz, Mercado, Conway, Maccarley Counts, Shomer, Felton, Overton, Berke, Rykoff, and Judge Hickok Apparently Lie in Court!