Bmjopen 2020 044291
Bmjopen 2020 044291
Bmjopen 2020 044291
different pressures and priorities across sectors, with little supplemental table 1).36 A protocol for this scoping
incentive to work together as a system. For example, while review was developed in consultation with a librarian at
hospitals may be focused on efficiency and throughput, the University of Toronto, with continuous input from
community- based organisations may be focused on members of the research team.
empowerment, longer-term quality of life outcomes and
working at a pace that works for patients and families. Stage 1: identifying the research question
The funding structure of hospitals and healthcare systems The research question developed to lead this scoping
can also have an impact on overall patient flow, including review was: what is known in the literature about initia-
discharge delays. Although there is wide variation in tives (eg, strategies, programmes, interventions) that
funding structures within and across countries, there is have been developed, implemented and/or evaluated for
potential for funding to either incentivise or disincen- delayed discharge involving a hospital setting? The two
tivise timely hospital discharges.26–30 main aims were: (1) to review what delayed discharge
The combination of patient- level and system- level initiatives entail (eg, characteristics, outcomes) and (2)
factors contributing to delayed discharges can also have to identify gaps in the literature in order to inform future
a large financial impact on patients, families, healthcare studies.
providers and the healthcare system.3 A recent system-
atic review reported that delayed discharges cost approx- Stage 2: identifying relevant articles
imately £200–565 ($C320–$C900) per patient, per day.3 The search strategy was developed with a librarian at the
Further, it was estimated that the National Health Service University of Toronto and through consultations with an
(NHS) (England) spends £820 million ($C1.3 billion) advisory group and collaborators who have experience
every year on patients who have a discharge delay.31 Simi- in clinical practice or administration (see online supple-
larly, a recent report from Canada stated that three hospi- mental table 2 for Medline search strategy). Each search
tals located in Ottawa, Ontario, spend approximately strategy was adapted for the specific database using appro-
$C250 000 per day (combined) on patients occupying priate command line syntax and indexing. The following
beds at a level of care they no longer require.32 In addi- are examples of keywords searched using Boolean oper-
tion to large costs for hospitals and healthcare systems, ators, proximity operators, wild cards and truncations:
delayed hospital discharges can result in out-of-pocket ALC, delayed discharge, delayed transfer, bed blocking,
costs for patients and families.33 Increased out-of-pocket strategy, model, intervention, programme, policy.
costs, in addition to the other uncertainties associated Electronic databases were searched for relevant articles.
with a delay, can heighten stress for patients and families, The following electronic databases were searched on 16
contribute to poor experiences and compromise quality August 2019: MEDLINE (Ovid Interface), EMBASE (Ovid
of life.9 Interface), AMED (Ovid Interface), Cumulative Index
Overall, delayed hospital discharges are problematic to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (EBSCO Inter-
internationally, highlighting a need to identify best prac- face) and Cochrane Library. Grey literature was searched
tices and current initiatives that are concentrating on on the following databases and repositories: OpenGrey,
solutions to this complex problem. To date, the majority Health Services Research Projects in Progress, UpToDate,
of published literature on delayed discharge has focused Community Research and Development Information
on risk factors and characteristics of patients who experi- Services and TSpace, as well as on numerous national and
ence delayed discharge. There has been a limited focus international healthcare and government websites. We
on initiatives that address the delayed discharge problem. also reached out to key stakeholders, including members
Therefore, the purpose of this scoping review was to of our advisory group, to send us relevant reports and
examine peer reviewed and grey literature (literature presentations.
published through non-traditional means) for initiatives
that have been developed and/or evaluated for delayed Stage 3: study selection
discharge from a hospital setting, with the goal of iden- For inclusion, articles (peer-reviewed and grey literature)
tifying best practices for reducing delayed discharge. were required to meet the following criteria: (1) focused
A scoping review methodology was appropriate for on delayed discharge, (2) included an initiative to address
addressing this goal, in order to identify the types of avail- delayed discharge, (3) involved a hospital setting, (4)
able evidence on this topic, examine key characteristics published between 1 January 2004 and 16 August 2019
relating to initiatives for delayed discharge and to identity and (5) peer-reviewed or grey literature. We focused our
knowledge gaps.34 inclusion on initiatives involving a hospital setting because
this is where the problem of delayed discharges surfaces.
Articles were excluded if they met any one of the following
METHODS criteria: (1) focused on changing the threshold/timing
This review followed the scoping review methodology of discharge (early discharge), (2) books, book chapters,
outlined by Levac et al,35 as well as the recently developed opinion pieces or editorials, (3) grey literature that did
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and not sufficiently describe the initiative implemented (eg,
Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (see online implementation process, location, population, impact);
Patient and public involvement The initiatives most commonly targeted adults and older
An advisory council (patient and caregiver partners), adults; however, there were some initiatives targeting the
along with providers, managers and organisational paediatric population. Specific characteristics of the study
leaders identified the lack of understanding about population (ie, age, sex, gender, ethnicity/race, income
the state of evidence around best practices for delayed level, education, marital status, household composition,
discharges, which informed the research question for this employment status, comorbidities) were not reported
scoping review. The advisory council was involved with in the majority of articles. Most peer-reviewed articles
planning meetings where they provided feedback on the (n=31) defined a delayed discharge; however, there was
search terms and analysis. Results will be disseminated a wide variety of definitions for these terms (see online
to the advisory council through presentations and a lay supplemental table 3). The most common definition for
summary. delayed discharge was when a patient was identified as
medically ready for discharge, but remained in hospital.
Table 3 describes the initiative characteristics.
RESULTS Based on Doern and Phidd’s adapted framework,39
Study characteristics we categorised the included initiatives as: information
The database search identified 15 824 unique articles that sharing (n=19); tools and guidelines (n=19); practice
were screened for eligibility; following title/abstract and changes (n=36); infrastructure and finance (n=10); or
full-text review, 66 articles were included in this scoping other (n=3), which are described in detail below (see
review, 49 articles from the database searches and 17 figure 2). Numerous articles used a combination of cate-
articles from the grey literature searches (figure 1). The gories in their initiatives (eg, information sharing and
majority of included articles were quantitative studies practice change).
(n=34), with a few qualitative (n=5), mixed methods
(n=6) or other designs (policy analyses, reviews, case Information sharing
studies and presentations; n=21). There was a large The information sharing category included initiatives
variety of study designs, with few randomised trials and that promoted communication, leadership from senior
prospective studies. Most initiatives were evaluated staff and information exchange within or across organi-
(n=42), with different types of evaluations such as process sations.2 40–55 The majority of information sharing initia-
evaluations and outcome evaluations. The UK (n=21), tives included team meetings and huddles to facilitate
USA (n=18) and Canada (n=17) were the most common communication through in-person interactions between
countries where studies were conducted. Based on the staff, and less often between staff and patients/fami-
year of publication, there was a fairly even distribution of lies.40 41 43 44 46 Information sharing was promoted between
peer-reviewed articles across the years of inclusion (from multidisciplinary teams and patients to improve length
2004 to 2019); however, the majority of grey literature was of stay and continuity of care. For example, Adlington et
published in the last 10 years. Table 2 describes the char- al implemented Plan Do Study Act cycles during weekly
acteristics of included articles. quality improvement meetings, in which driver diagrams
Continued
Open access
5
6
Table 2 Continued
Method
Author (year) Country Objective Study design Participants Sample size Key conclusions
Boutette Canada Serve frail elderly patients at risk of NR Frail older patients who are at risk of NR ►► Key features of the model:
(2018)71 deconditioning and/or disability, caused Review/ description of deconditioning and/or disability proactive, restorative, collaborative
Open access
Continued
Continued
Open access
7
8
Table 2 Continued
Method
Author (year) Country Objective Study design Participants Sample size Key conclusions
Mahant Canada Determine if an audit-and-feedback Quantitative Paediatric inpatient 3194 ►► Reduced inappropriate hospital
(2008)59 intervention reduces delayed discharge Prospective days, without impacting
Open access
Continued
Sampson UK Describe bed occupancy data in Quantitative Diabetes inpatients 152 080 ►► Diabetes inpatient specialist nurse
(2006)79 people with diabetes before and after Retrospective study reduced excess bed occupancy
the introduction of a diabetes inpatient
specialist nurse service
Shah (2007)97 England Examine the impact of the Community Quantitative Inpatient - specialties of GM and NR ►► More patients were admitted to GM
Care (Delayed Discharge) Act on Retrospective study OAP services services and had a shorter length
bed occupancy and length of stay in of stay than OAP
Geriatric Medicine (GM) and Old Age
Psychiatry (OAP) services
Open access
Continued
9
10
Table 2 Continued
Method
Author (year) Country Objective Study design Participants Sample size Key conclusions
Sobotka USA Describe a hospital-to-home transitional Case study Paediatric inpatient 1 ►► Transitional care programmes
(2017)51 care model Illustrative case design/ can improve care for vulnerable
Open access
Continued
Continued
Open access
11
12
Open access
Table 2 Continued
Method
Author (year) Country Objective Study design Participants Sample size Key conclusions
Shah (2011)90 Canada Ensure the appropriate community N/A High need seniors (75+) NR ►► Key success factors included:
resources are in place to support the Implementation guide eliminating long discharge
patient on discharge and toolkit processes, having engaged
leadership, having measurable
targets, monitoring performance
and educating patients and
providers
Central East Canada Understand the impact of delayed N/A ALC patients NR ►► ALC is a complex issue and
LHIN ALC Task discharges in the Central East regions of Report requires coordination across
Group (2008)84 Ontario (reviewing data, reading reports, sectors
initiating a pilot study, developing a ►► Implementation of the
patient flow map) recommendations will help to
reduce ALC days and improve
patient flow
Adams, Care & UK Assist older patients in returning home Case study Older patients 1 ►► Large savings for the health
Repair England from hospital quickly and safely Case study system can be generated with the
(2017)98 implementation of this intervention
Shah (2010)89 Canada Describe the Home First approach, a Quantitative Elderly patients NR ►► Allows patients the opportunity to
philosophy for reducing ALC Quality improvement regain independence and return
home
►► ALC solutions need a collaborative,
cross-sectoral approach
Joint Scotland Identify 10 action items to transform N/A N/A NR ►► There are a number of factors to
Improvement discharge processes Quality improvement/ successfully reduce delays
Team (2013)85 stakeholder
engagement
ALC, alternate level of care; BIRU, brain injury rehabilitation unit; GM, geriatric medicine; ICU, intensive care unit; N/A, not applicable; NR, not reported; OAP, old age psychiatry; SRU, stroke
rehabilitation unit.
Continued
Open access
13
14
Table 3 Continued
Initiative Initiative
Author Description/content Target population Setting category* Results
70
Blecker 7 day hospital initiative Non-obstetric Hospital Practice changes ►► Decreased average length of stay by 13%
Open access
►► Increased hospital services on the weekend hospitalised patients Tisch Hospital, 705 beds ►► Increased proportion of weekend discharges
(eg, diagnostic imaging, weekend discharges, by 12%
physician and care management services) ►► Decreased 30-day readmissions
►► No changes in mortality
Boutette71 Subacute care unit for frail elderly Frail older patients Hospitals Practice changes ►► N/A
►► Subacute care in a restorative environment who are at risk of Ottawa Hospital; Perley and
(integrated care and restoration) deconditioning Rideau Veterans’ Health
associated with a Centre
long hospitalisation
Bowen72 Nurse-led discharge Adult ear, nose, Hospital Practice changes ►► Significant reduction in rate of delayed
►► Allows nurses to facilitate discharge based throat patients having University Hospital of South discharges in both audits
on specific criteria that was developed to routine, elective, Manchester
guide the discharge process (also allows for short-stay surgery
discharge in evenings and on weekends)
Boyd41 Communication and leadership NR Hospitals (2) Information ►► Strategies for improving delayed discharges
►► Efficient communication and leadership from Part of a hospital sharing live and reducing financial burden included
hospital administrators conglomerate in Chicago efficient communication and effective
leadership
Brankline47 Technology-assisted referrals Elderly patients who Academic Medical Centre Information ►► Decreased length of stay and improved
►► The use of technology to improve information require nursing home sharing live timely discharges of patients resulted in cost
exchange and processes, increase data placement after Tools and savings
accuracy and produce documents hospital discharge guidelines ►► Increased communication within and between
the hospital and nursing homes
Brown64 Discharge criteria Adult, ASA physical Hospital Tools and ►► Decreased length of stay in the post-
►► Nurse implementation of predetermined status I, II, and III Postoperative recovery area guidelines anaesthesia care unit by 24%
discharge criteria (activity, respirations, pulse, patients, 18 years of a large, tertiary-care, Practice changes ►► Reduced discharge delays with nurse-led
blood pressure, pain, etc) or older, requiring academic hospital discharge
general anaesthesia ►► No change in adverse events (airway
obstruction, reintubation, arrest)
Burr56 ALC avoidance framework ALC patients Hospitals (3) Tools and ►► (1) MGH—exceeded ALC target by 20%,
►► A framework of strategies to reduce ALC 1. Michael Garron Hospital guidelines reduced number of ALC patients waiting for
numbers and promote ALC avoidance 2. Humber River Hospital long-term care
3. Toronto General Hospital ►► (2) HRH—culture shift after implementation of
ALC framework recommendations
►► (3) TGH—improved number of ALC admission
avoidance cases
Caminiti42 Physician accountability Hospital Units: Hospital Information ►► Reduction in unnecessary, avoidable hospital
►► Physician motivation and accountability geriatric, medicine, University Hospital of Parma, sharing live days
through monthly reports and audits (can long-term care 1267 beds ►► No significant changes in 30-day readmission
compare their length of stay results to other or mortality
staff)
Continued
Continued
Open access
15
16
Table 3 Continued
Initiative Initiative
Author Description/content Target population Setting category* Results
66
Lees-Deutsch Criteria led discharge - Selection of Patients for Patients discharged Hospital (acute medicine Tools and ►► 27 patients were suitable for criteria led
Open access
Efficient and Effective Discharge from the AMU and service with four clinical guidelines discharge, 23 were not
►► Patient discharge is guided by a set of clinical both short-stay wards areas) Practice changes ►► Mean wait time for the 27 suitable patients
criteria; once the patient meets the criteria, a prior to discharge was 4 hours and 51 min
member of the team can facilitate discharge ►► Discharge delays were often caused by
system delays
Levin94 Step-up intermediate care units Aged 75+ Hospital Infrastructure and ►► Reduced bed days delayed
►► A bridging service between hospital and home finance ►► Rate of days delayed increased over time
for individuals ready for discharge from acute
care; allows for recovery and regaining of
independence
Lian58 New discharge guidelines for premature babies Premature infants Hospital Tools and ►► Reduced median duration of hospitalisation
►► Development of new discharge guidelines for Singapore General Hospital guidelines from 58.2 days to 34.9 days
premature neonates ►► Cost savings of $6174/infant
Maessen75 Enhanced recovery after surgery Patients undergoing Hospital Practice changes ►► No significant difference in proportion of
►► Reduction in the postoperative recovery period elective colorectal patients with a discharge delay post-ERAS
to reduce overall hospital length of stay resection programme
►► Approximately 90% of patients pre and
post-ERAS were not discharged on the day
discharge criteria/ functional recovery were
met
Mahant (2008)59 Medical Care Appropriateness Protoco-audit and Paediatric inpatients Hospital Tools and ►► Significantly lower risk of inappropriate
feedback Hospital for Sick Children guidelines hospital days
►► A tool that provides information on hospital ►► During the intervention, 33% of bed days
bed use (qualified and nonqualified hospital were nonqualified, compared with 47% pre-
days) intervention
►► No change in 48-hour readmission rate
Mahto 76 Hospital diabetes outreach service Acutely admitted Hospital Practice changes ►► Reduction in bed occupancy, inappropriate
►► A service to prevent admission through a patients with diabetes New Cross Hospital, 700 admissions, delayed discharges and effective
number of strategies (improved access to beds discharge planning
services, management of medical problems,
early discharge planning, organisation of
follow-up care)
Maloney49 Patient tracker Inpatients Hospital Tools and ►► Decreased number of cancelled surgeries,
►► A web-based application to facilitate Primary Children’s Medical guidelines median emergency department length of stay
the discharge process by enhancing Centre Information and average number of inpatient admissions
communication between disciplines sharing live
Manville95 Transitional care unit Elderly ALC patients Hospital Infrastructure and ►► Improved health outcomes and discharge
►► A rehabilitation-style unit with enhanced (70+) St Joseph’s Hospital, 22-bed finance disposition, decreased length of stay and
nursing and rehabilitation services for elderly transitional care unit costs per patient
patients
Continued
Continued
Open access
17
18
Table 3 Continued
Initiative Initiative
Author Description/content Target population Setting category* Results
96
Rae Delayed discharge project Acute general Hospital Infrastructure and ►► Mean length of stay decreased by 2.6 days
Open access
►► Local authorities are financially responsible medical patients Dunedin hospital finance (from 6.5 to 3.9 days)
(payments) to acute hospital when patients ►► Decreased costs of service delivery by
remain in hospital because community care $2.4 million
arrangements have not been made ►► Bed numbers decreased by 24 (from 56 to
32)
►► No change in readmission rates
Roberts50 Royal Rehabilitation Centre, Sydney, goal length Inpatients in two Hospital Tools and ►► Total discharge delays from the 2 units
of stay tool units: SRU (stroke Hampstead Rehabilitation guidelines totaled 6311 days
►► A tool that reports the length of stay rehabilitation unit) or Centre, 128 beds Information ►► Length of stay was not decreased
benchmark figures on an individual patient BIRU (Brain Injury sharing live ►► Negative perceptions of the programme from
basis Rehabilitation Unit staff
Sampson79 Diabetes inpatient specialist nurse Diabetes inpatients Hospital Practice changes ►► Decreased mean excess bed days by
►► Diabetes management, based on structured Norfolk and Norwich 0.7 days (from 1.9 to 1.2)
group education, for all diabetes inpatients University Hospital NHS
Trust, 989 beds
Shah97 Community Care (Delayed Discharge) Act 2003 Inpatient - specialties Hospitals Infrastructure and GM:
►► Local authorities are financially responsible of Geriatric Medicine finance ►► Decreased median and mean length of stay
(payments) to acute hospital when patients (GM) and Old Age ►► Increased number of finished episodes
remain in hospital because community care Psychiatry (OAP) (inpatient discharges)
arrangements have not been made services ►► No relationship with number of bed days
OAP:
►► Increased median and mean length of stay
►► Decreased number of finished episodes
(inpatient discharges)
►► Increased number of bed days
Sobotka51 Hospital-to-home transitional care programme at Paediatric inpatient Transitional and Respite Practice changes ►► 2 months following support at AHK, the
AHK Centre Information patient transitioned home to be cared for by
Almost Home Kids sharing live his mother and home care team
►► A programme to support and educate families
on providing care for medically stable children
at home
Starr- Home First ALC patients Hospitals Practice changes ►► Rate of ALC patients decreased by at least
Hemburrow80 ►► A programme designed to help keep patients 50% across the region of study
in their homes (with community supports) for
as long as possible; focusing on providing
access to needed services
Sutherland45 Build more; Integrated care; and Financial ALC patients Hospitals Information ►► N/A
incentives sharing
►► Three strategies to improve ALC impact on recommendation
hospitals (build more beds, integrated care, document
financial incentives for post-acute providers)
Continued
Continued
Open access
19
20
Table 3 Continued
Open access
Initiative Initiative
Author Description/content Target population Setting category* Results
Manzano- Payment by Results and Delayed Discharges Act NR NR Infrastructure and ►► Payment by Results and the Delayed
Santaella100 ►► Payment by Results pays providers a fixed finance Discharges Act are related policies
price for each individual case, while with the
Delayed Discharges Act, local authorities are
financially responsible when patients remain
in hospital because community care has not
been arranged
Krystal86 Southlake@Home Medically and socially Hospital Practice changes ►► Reduction in ALC days (average of 10.6 days)
►► A team designed to meet the patients care complex and frail Southlake Regional Health ►► 1088 ALC days avoided
needs through partnerships with community elderly Centre ►► Positive patient and provider experiences
and primary care (integrates primary care,
hospital care and home and community care
to develop a personalised care plan)
Walker2 Recommendations for improving care for the NR NR Information ►► NR
ageing population sharing
►► Numerous recommendations to improve recommendation
ALC in acute and community care ranging document
from proactively identifying patients at risk of
decline in primary care to making hospitals
more ‘senior friendly.’
North West Wait at home Seniors waiting for NR Practice changes ►► NR
Community Care ►► Allows seniors to get their healthcare needs LTC placement
Access Centre88 from their home through a variety of services
for a up to 90 days
Toronto Central ALC avoidance framework NR NR Tools and ►► NR
Community Care ►► To create a standardised approach to avoid guidelines
Access Centre67 delayed discharges through 12 leadings
practices and associated strategies (identifying
a date of discharge, engaging with substitute
decision makers, etc)
Province of New ALC collaborative committee NR NR Information ►► Reduction in percentage of acute hospital
Brunswick92 ►► A committee developed to identify and sharing live days used by patients waiting for discharge
implement priority strategic initiatives Practice changes from 19.6% to 17.5%
Infrastructure and
finance
Continued
Continued
Open access
21
Open access
Hospital; ICU, intensive care unit; LHIN, local health integration network; LTC, long-term care; MGH, Michael Garron Hospital; N/A, not available; NR, not reported; OAP, old age psychiatry; TGH, Toronto
using a framework for admissions, transfers
►► The equivalent of 35 acute care beds have
AHK, almost home kids; ALC, alternate level of care; D2A, discharge to assess; ED, emergency department; ERAS, enhanced recovery after surgery; GM, geriatric medicine; HRH, Humber River
►► Factors in reducing delays include:
been saved over 2 years
first culture
placement
Results
Practice changes
Practice changes
category*
Initiative
Team85
89
Shah
Joint
ALC and implementing escalation processes for the weekend discharges and no impact on readmission rates
management of ALC challenges. Additional initiatives or mortality.
focused on improving patient flow through criteria-led The majority of initiatives categorised as a practice
discharges (discharging patients once a predetermined change resulted in positive outcomes on length of stay and
set of criteria had been met) and critical pathways/ rate of discharge delays. However, there were several initia-
discharge guidelines. tives that were perceived negatively by patients,77 or had
The majority of initiatives categorised as tools and no change68 75 or a negative impact52 on study outcomes
guidelines had positive results,47–49 54–60 62 64–66 which (increase in delayed discharges). Meehan et al explored
included a reduction in hospital days and length of stay. patient experiences with a programme (Discharge to
However, one initiative, the Goal Length of Stay Tool, did Assess) that discharged patients who were clinically ready
not have positive outcomes on length of stay.50 This initia- but still required support, in order for their needs to be
tive incorporated information sharing into a computer- assessed in their own environment (ie, at home).77 Nega-
based programme to identify patients whose length of tive experiences were described by participants (patients
stay exceeded their benchmark figure. It had no change and caregivers) who indicated feeling ignored, had poor
on length of stay and was perceived negatively by staff communication with their healthcare providers and were
because they did not believe the benchmark figure was an not involved in the decision-making process. Negative
accurate representation of a patient’s current functional outcomes were also identified in Williams et al prospective
status and readiness for discharge. cohort study.52 This study evaluated the impact of a crit-
ical care outreach role on delays in discharge and iden-
tified that discharge delays from the intensive care unit
Practice changes
increased over the study period with the implementation
This category included initiatives that altered how usual
of this role. The authors emphasised the importance of
care was delivered.51–55 63–66 68–92 Common practice change
a multifaceted and collaborative approach (involving
initiatives included hospital-based, nurse-led discharges
multiple stakeholders/ team members), focusing on
and cross-sectoral transitional programmes (eg, Home
patient flow throughout the hospital in order to address
First, Discharge to Assess, Hospital to Home). Most were
the numerous factors impacting delays.
implemented by nurses and multidisciplinary teams.
Nurse- led and criteria-
led discharges often involved a
Infrastructure and finance
predetermined list of criteria (clinical parameters) that
The infrastructure and finance category included initia-
a patient was required to meet in order to be discharged
tives that involved tangible structural or financial changes
from hospital by a member of the discharge team. For
(eg, building more long-term care beds to facilitate the
example, Graham et al conducted a retrospective study transition of patients out of hospital, financial penalties
(N=128) to compare nurse-led and doctor-led discharge for remaining in hospital after being medically ready
(standard discharge pathway) postlaparoscopic surgery.74 for discharge).55 92–100 The Community Care (Delayed
For nurse-led discharge, the patient had to meet 13 pre- Discharges) Act in the UK was an initiative identified in
established criteria (stable vital signs and comparable multiple articles.93 96 97 100 This initiative required local
to baseline on admission; achieved optimal mobility; authorities to make payments to acute hospitals when
minimal nausea, vomiting and dizziness; adequate patients could not be discharged because appropriate
pain control; received written and verbal instructions community care arrangements had not been made.
about postoperative care, etc). When compared with Although this measure was not necessarily enforced, it
the doctor-led discharge group (n=64), patients in the created incentive for the hospital and community to work
nurse-led group (n=64) were significantly more likely to together more collaboratively. Additionally, transitional
be discharged on the day of surgery. Incomparing reasons care units94 95 and discharge funds98 99 were common
for the success of the nurse-led model, the authors did initiatives implemented to address delayed discharges
not tieit to patient factors but rather the ready availability among elderly patients. Transitional care units focused
of the nurse specialistwho was able to implement the on rehabilitation to promote recovery and the regaining
clearly outlined discharge criteria (specific fornurse-led of independence, while discharge funds paid for services
discharge) much more quickly than the doctor-led group that were preventing the patient from being discharged
(who did not use suchcriteria). or returning home (eg, medical equipment, medications,
Another unique example of a practice change initiative transportation, home repairs). All initiatives categorised
was the 7-day Hospital Initiative implemented by Blecker as infrastructure and finance had positive results on study
et al.70 The purpose of this observational study was to eval- outcomes, including reductions in discharge delays,
uate the impact of increasing weekend staff (hospitalists, length of stay and cost.93–98
care managers, social workers) and services on length
of stay, percent of patients discharged on weekends, Other initiatives
30-day readmission rate and in-hospital mortality rate. The other initiatives category included statistical and
This multifaceted intervention resulted in a decreased predictive modelling of initiatives to improve delayed
average length of stay, an increased proportion of discharges.101–103 These models explored the impact of
increasing the supply of nursing home beds,101 potential focused on quantitative outcomes, with limited assess-
care pathways for the elderly and reimbursement costs102 ment of the impact on patient, caregiver and provider
and discharge strategies to reduce hospital occupancy.103 experiences; (2) the sustainability of initiatives overtime
Gaughan et al's modelling and empirical analysis iden- is not measured (3) there is a lack of important contex-
tified that increasing the supply of long-term care beds tual information reported (eg, population characteris-
can decrease delayed discharges caused by a lack of social tics, setting, implementation processes) and (4) there are
care.101 Their models further emphasised the importance inconsistencies in how delayed discharges are defined.
of communication between hospitals and the long-term This review highlighted where the majority of efforts
care sector to reduce social care delayed discharges. Simi- around addressing delayed discharges have been placed.
larly, Katsaliaki et al used discrete-event simulations to Practice change was the most common categorisation of
determine care pathways and associated costs, in which initiatives (n=36), followed by information sharing (n=19)
they identified that adding new beds in hospital or inter- and infrastructure and finance (n=19). All initiatives cate-
mediate care could reduce delay times.102 gorised as information sharing and infrastructure and
finance reported positive outcomes. Despite reporting
Recommended initiatives: calls to action positive outcomes, many information sharing initiatives
Several articles were not evaluations but reports or reviews promoted communication between staff, with a limited
consisting of recommended initiatives to address delayed number targeting communication with patients and
hospital discharges, which often combined a number of families. Additionally, there were more initiatives imple-
the categories illustrated above.2 45 92 104 Sutherland and mented in a single sector (eg, in hospital) in comparison
Crump outlined three key solutions for improving delayed to cross-sectoral initiatives (eg, hospital and home care).
discharges in Canada: building more acute and postacute Length of stay was the most common outcome measured
care beds, increasing integrated care and creating finan- in this scoping review, with a limited number of articles
cial incentives to improve the quality, quantity and effec- exploring patient, caregiver and provider experiences.
tiveness of healthcare.45 The authors discussed challenges For example, could it be considered a success if an initia-
and limitations to implementing each of these options tive does not result in a reduced length of stay, but allows
and emphasised that a potential solution to addressing patients to obtain broader goals related to their care (ie,
delayed discharges was to combine the three strategies. being able to return home) or enhance their care expe-
Another Canadian report developed recommendations rience? Qualitative methods, including the capturing of
for providing care to the ageing population and those patient, caregiver and provider experiences, would allow
experiencing a delayed discharge.2 Walker outlined for a deeper exploration and understanding of success
recommendations for improving primary care, the care from the perspectives of different stakeholders involved
continuum and senior friendly acute care, responding to in the initiative.105–107 Experiential evidence on whether
special needs populations (eg, persons with mental health an intervention is working is required. As noted in our
concerns, addiction and neurological conditions, on dial- review, a tool developed to better understand delayed
ysis or ventilators), and implementing an ‘Assess and discharge was deemed irrelevant by care providers who
Restore’ model (a programme to help patients maintain felt that the tool captured the wrong information.50 There-
or regain functional independence, transition to home fore, capturing providers’ experiences and perspectives
and remain in the community for as long as possible). are essential in understanding effectiveness of strategies
The NHS improvement (UK) also released a guide as well as uptake. Most articles included in this scoping
in 2019 on reducing long hospital stays.104 This guide review used a quantitative study design, with limited arti-
contained several recommendations for tackling delayed cles using mixed methods or qualitative approaches; thus
discharges including: a patient flow bundle (a tool to highlighting a key focus for future research.
reduce delays for patients on inpatient wards), Red2Green The majority of initiatives had an intervention or
Days (a visual tool to reduce unnecessary waiting by follow-up period of 1 year, but this ranged from 4 months
patients by supporting the rounding process), long- to 3 years. Based on the limited number initiatives with a
stay patient reviews (weekly reviews of long-stay patients follow-up period of longer than 1 year (n=8), there is a
(>20 days), to help tackle obstacles that are delaying need for more formal evaluations with longer follow-up
discharge) and multiagency discharge events (review of periods to measure the sustainability of initiatives over
individual patient journeys by bringing together senior time. For example, Shelton et al’s Integrated Sustain-
staff from the local health and social care system). ability Framework consists of five categories of factors
associated with the sustainability of interventions across
different contexts and settings: outer context (eg, poli-
DISCUSSION cies, leadership, funding), inner context (eg, culture,
The purpose of this scoping review was to identify best mission, funding), intervention characteristics (eg,
practices for reducing delayed discharges, examine the cost, adaptability, benefit), processes (eg, partnership,
characteristics of identified initiatives and develop recom- training/support, planning, capacity building) and
mendations for future work. Based on the 66 included implementer and population characteristics (eg, imple-
articles, our findings showed that: (1) initiatives are mentation skills/expertise, attitudes/motivation).108
Shelton et al recommended prospective, multi-level and strategy (how strategies were implemented, over what
mixed methods study designs for studying the impact time period, how implementation challenges were dealt
and sustainability of interventions. Overall, the initiatives with), setting (where was it implemented) and popu-
included in this scoping review had positive short-term lation characteristics (who was it implemented for).
impacts, but it is unclear if these outcomes are main- The implementation of initiatives can be impacted by
tained over time. This emphasises the need to design and differences in healthcare system structure and funding.
implement interventions with sustainability in mind. Further, this contextual information is essential for both
The majority of categories of initiatives resulted in posi- understanding outcomes, scaling-up and sustainability of
tive outcomes; however, initiatives classified as practice interventions because it is not only important to know if
change had the most mixed outcomes (positive, negative the intervention was effective, but also for whom and in
and no change). Practice changes often require a greater what context it was effective.110 111
number of resources and are more complex to implement Finally, this review highlighted a lack of consistency
than static solutions (ie, hosting daily rounds, developing in how delayed discharge was defined, both within and
a framework, etc). A recent systematic review (2018) across countries. While there was one definition that was
conducted by Geerligs et al identified implementation used more frequently (a patient was identified as medi-
barriers and facilitators of patient- focused, in-hospital cally ready/fit for discharge, but remained in hospital),
interventions,109 highlighting the complex interplay of there can be different interpretations of when a patient
factors that can impact implementation. Three domains, is considered ‘medically fit’ and who makes this deci-
with the potential to impact the implementation process, sion. Inconsistent definitions can lead to variations in the
were identified: system (environmental context, culture, reported rates of delayed discharge, which can further
communication processes and external requirements), impact the perceived applicability and effectiveness of an
staff (commitment and attitudes, understanding and intervention. Our finding was echoed in a narrative review
awareness, role identity and skills, ability and confidence) conducted by Glasby et al, who further explained the
and intervention (ease of integration, face validity, safety challenges differing definitions create when attempting
and legality and supportive components). Thus, it is to compare findings.112 In order to mitigate these chal-
important for interventions to be nimble and adaptable lenges, it is critical to be more consistent around how
to support the changing need of patients, caregivers, delayed discharges are defined.
providers, organisations and policy contexts over time.
It was also unclear if some initiatives moved prob- Future work
lems from one sector to another. For example, adding From this review, we have identified areas for future
more intermediate care beds may alleviate pressures in research. First, patient, family and provider needs and
acute care in the short-term but eventually also be at full experiences should be explored during the development
capacity if community resources are not available. The and implementation of initiatives aimed at improving
7-
day hospital discharge initiative highlighted in this delayed discharges. Patient and family engagement is both
review, improved hospital throughput but had no impact important and recommended by healthcare and govern-
on re-admissions,70 suggesting that thinking beyond one ment organisations; however, they are often excluded
sector is required. It is encouraging that most practice in the development and write-up of best practice guide-
change initiatives resulted in improved outcomes, but lines.113 Second, evaluation studies that track outcomes
more clarity is needed to understand what the trade-offs over a longer period of time should be conducted to
were, as well as how to scale-up the successful initiatives. study the sustainability of initiatives over time, how they
Health systems also need to consider their broader are adapted (developmental evaluations), as well as
goals around delayed hospital discharge—should it only their impact on other sectors (eg, primary and commu-
be about reducing delays or should we place an equal nity care). Third, initiatives should be implemented and
focus on optimising patient and caregiver experiences integrated across sectors (hospital, primary care and
and outcomes? The health system context, including the home and community care) to help get at the root of the
funding environment, will ultimately shape what inter- problem and ensure the implementation of an initiative in
ventions get implemented and how they are sustained one setting does not simply shift the problem to another.
over time. Some interventions may be considered low Fourth, a review should be conducted to assess the state
value in some countries and contexts and high value of knowledge around initiatives that are more upstream
in others. Additionally, certain initiatives may be more in nature (eg, hospital admission avoidance, emergency
effective in different environments, as variations in the department diversion and delivery models that proactively
number of hospital and long-term care beds per capita, address the health and social care needs of individuals in
infrastructure financing and degree of integration across community settings). Finally, there is an opportunity for
sectors may impact the outcomes of an initiative. Future future research to consider a realist review of the liter-
research needs to better understand why some strategies ature on delayed hospital discharge to understand the
may thrive in some environments and not others. context, mechanisms of impact, outcomes and theories
Another key finding identified in the scoping review was of change, given that addressing a delayed discharge is
the lack of information and details on the implementation a complex problem. As a first step, we sought to include
interventions that included hospitals, and this revealed a hospitals including communication huddles, nurse- led
single sector and reactive approach to addressing delayed discharges, home first programmes and building more
discharge. infrastructure had positive short- term impacts. Many
initiatives that led to positive outcomes were implemented
Limitations by a multidisciplinary team and included a number of
There are a few limitations of this review that should components (eg, monthly reports and education). The
be noted. It is possible that some relevant articles were success of these initiatives is based on a service-led defini-
missed because the search was limited from 1 January tion of success (effective use of hospital resources), rather
2004 and 16 August 2019 and conducted in English. Our than success from the patient and family perspective. This
search strategy was comprehensive and we conducted an highlights the need to shift to a more patient-centred
in-depth search of grey literature to minimise the poten- approach that focuses on improving outcomes and expe-
tial of missed articles. While we did not limit the inclusion riences, rather than system and hospital outcomes (ie,
of articles to the English language, our search strategy was length of stay and hospital occupancy) alone. Despite
in English, so there is a possibility that articles published the number of unique initiatives aimed at addressing
in different languages were not identified. We excluded delayed discharges, current strategies may not be getting
studies that changed the threshold/timing of discharge at the root of the problem (initiatives/intervention prior
(early discharge), as they often focused on cost-savings. to hospital admission) and there is a need for solutions
We acknowledge that some of these initiatives may have to this problem that have a long-term and sustainable
transferable lessons to address discharge delays, and impact.
thus, note their exclusion as a potential limitation of
this review. Although it is not a requirement for scoping Author affiliations
reviews,36 the interventions in this review were not criti-
1
Institute for Better Health, Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
2
cally appraised, and thus, we cannot make recommenda- Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
3
Rehabiliation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
tions on which interventions should be scaled up. Given 4
Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public
concerns with regression toward the mean, especially for Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
quality improvement projects, any positive results need to 5
Quality Division, Ontario Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
6
be interpreted with caution. Health systems are complex, Centre for Health Services and Policy Research, School of Population and Public
evolving environments, where various iterations of strat- Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
7
School of Social Policy, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK
egies are regularly implemented, but not necessarily 8
Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto,
formally reported or published. Future work by our team Ontario, Canada
will include a process evaluation on how strategies are 9
MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Ontario,
actually implemented in different health system contexts, Canada
as well as why they work or do not work.
Twitter Kristina Marie Kokorelias @kmkokorelias
Ethical considerations Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank the University of Toronto
There are a few ethical concerns associated with scoping librarian for their contribution to the search strategy, as well as Juliane Koropeski
(JK) and Maliha Asif (MA) for their help screening articles. We would like to thank
reviews to be noted. These concerns include authorship, the involvement of our stakeholders who provided feedback on our search terms
transparency and plagiarism. All authors met the Inter- and sent us grey literature. Lastly, we would like to thank our Alternate Level of
national Committee of Medical Journal Editors’ recom- Care Advisory Council and Ida McLaughlin (chair of council) for their continual
mended criteria for authorship and author order was support and feedback on this programme of work.
based on overall contribution to the review. We clearly Contributors KK, SJTG, JS, JG and TK were responsible for the conception and
outlined our methods at each stage of the scoping review design of the study, as well as acquisition of funding for the study. LC, SJTG, KMK
and KK led the screening of articles and the analysis and interpretation of data, but
to ensure transparency and replicability. We also acknowl- all authors contributed to the analysis and interpretation. Drafts of the manuscript
edged individuals who contributed to the review, but who were reviewed and revised by all authors. All of the authors read and approved the
did not warrant authorship. Lastly, when reporting the final manuscript.
results of individual studies, we wrote them in our own Funding This work was supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research-
words and cited appropriately to avoid plagiarism. Transitions in Care Strategic Funding Initiative on Best and Wise Practices (Grant
#163064). KK holds the Dr Mathias Gysler Research Chair in Patient and Family
Centred Care. SJTG and TK are funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health
Research Embedded Scientist Salary Award on Transitions in Care working with
CONCLUSIONS Ontario Health (Quality); the award also supported staff to assist with screening.
This scoping review identified a variety of initiatives Competing interests None declared.
addressing delayed discharges across five categories: infor- Patient consent for publication Not required.
mation sharing, tools and guidelines, practice changes, Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
infrastructure and finance and other. The majority of
Data availability statement All data relevant to the study are included in the
initiatives were focused on practice changes and many article or uploaded as online supplemental information.
incorporated more than one category. Initiatives were Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has
often implemented in a single sector, rather than across not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been
sectors. It appears that many strategies implemented in peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those
of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and 20 Landeiro F, Leal J, Gray AM. The impact of social isolation on
responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content delayed Hospital discharges of older hip fracture patients and
includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability associated costs. Osteoporos Int 2016;27:737–45.
of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, 21 Poulos CJ, Magee C, Bashford G, et al. Determining level of
care appropriateness in the patient journey from acute care to
terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error rehabilitation. BMC Health Serv Res 2011;11:291–91.
and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise. 22 Zeitz KM, Carter L, Robinson C. The ebbs and flows of changing
Open access This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the acute bed capacity delays. Aust Health Rev 2013;37:66–9.
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which 23 Anderson ME, Glasheen JJ, Anoff D, et al. Understanding predictors
of prolonged hospitalizations among general medicine patients: a
permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially,
guide and preliminary analysis. J Hosp Med 2015;10:623–6.
and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is 24 Hendy P, Patel JH, Kordbacheh T, et al. In-depth analysis of delays
properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use to patient discharge: a metropolitan teaching hospital experience.
is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. Clin Med 2012;12:320–3.
25 Salonga-Reyes A, Scott IA. Stranded: causes and effects of
ORCID iDs discharge delays involving non-acute in-patients requiring
Lauren Cadel http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6925-8163 maintenance care in a tertiary hospital general medicine service.
Sara J T Guilcher http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9552-9139 Aust Health Review 2017;41:54–62.
26 Sutherland JM, Repin N, Crump RT. Paying for hospital services:
a hard look at the options. Toronto, Canada: CD Howe Institute,
2013: 1–32.
27 Sutherland J. Hospital payment policy in Canada: options for the
REFERENCES future. Canadian Health Services Research Foundation, 2011.
1 Bate A. Delayed transfers of care in the NHS, 2017: 1–20. 28 Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care. Quality-based
2 Walker D. Caring for our aging population and addressing alternate procedures indicators: an implementation guidance document.
level of care: report submitted to the Minister of health and long- Ontario, Canada, 2014: 1–38.
term care. Canada, 2011. 29 David G, Polsky D. Economics of Home Health Services. In: Culyer
3 Rojas-García A, Turner S, Pizzo E, et al. Impact and experiences AJ, ed. Encyclopedia of health economics. San Diego: Elsevier,
of delayed discharge: a mixed-studies systematic review. Health 2014: 477–83.
Expect 2018;21:41–56. 30 Treasury HM. Spring budget 2017. United Kingdom, 2017.
4 Barnable A, Welsh D, Lundrigan E, et al. Analysis of the influencing 31 Knowles G, Burke MR, Carr M. Independent expert review of
factors associated with being designated alternate level of care. delayed discharges: Department of health, 2018.
Home Health Care Manag Pract 2015;27:3–12. 32 Fagan L. 'Bed blockers' costing Ottawa hospitals millions. Glut of
5 McCloskey R, Jarrett P, Stewart C, et al. Alternate level of care patients awaiting more appropriate care a 'crisis,' health workers
patients in hospitals: what does dementia have to do with this? Can say. Ottawa: CBC News, 2019.
Geriatr J 2014;17:88–94. 33 McCloskey R, Jarrett P, Stewart C. The untold story of being
6 Walker H, Langton D, Thomson L. 'New to forensic'; implementing designated an alternate level of care patient. Healthc Policy
a problem-based introductory educational programme for 2015;11:76–89.
forensic practitioners in Scotland. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs 34 Munn Z, Peters MDJ, Stern C, et al. Systematic review or
2011;18:934–42. scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a
7 Jasinarachchi KH, Ibrahim IR, Keegan BC, et al. Delayed transfer systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Med Res Methodol
of care from NHS secondary care to primary care in England: its 2018;18:143.
determinants, effect on hospital bed days, prevalence of acute 35 Levac D, Colquhoun H, O'Brien KK. Scoping studies: advancing the
medical conditions and deaths during delay, in older adults aged 65 methodology. Implement Sci 2010;5:69.
years and over. BMC Geriatr 2009;9:4. 36 Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping
8 Rosman M, Rachminov O, Segal O, et al. Prolonged patients' in- reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med
hospital waiting period after discharge eligibility is associated with 2018;169:467–73.
increased risk of infection, morbidity and mortality: a retrospective 37 Bramer WM, Giustini D, de Jonge GB, et al. De-duplication of
cohort analysis. BMC Health Serv Res 2015;15:246–46. database search results for systematic reviews in endnote. J Med
9 Everall AC, Guilcher SJT, Cadel L, et al. Patient and caregiver Libr Assoc 2016;104:240–3.
experience with delayed discharge from a hospital setting: a 38 Babineau J. Product review: Covidence (systematic review
scoping review. Health Expect 2019;22:863–73. software). J Can Health Libr Assoc 2014;35:68–71.
10 Amy C, Zagorski B, Chan V, et al. Acute care alternate-level-of-care 39 Doern GB, Phidd RW. Canadian public policy: ideas, stucture and
days due to delayed discharge for traumatic and non-traumatic process. 2nd. Toronto, Canada: Nelson Canada, 1992.
brain injuries. Healthc Policy 2012;7:41–55. 40 Adlington K, Brown J, Ralph L, et al. Better care: reducing length of
11 Hwabejire JO, Kaafarani HMA, Imam AM, et al. Excessively long stay and bed occupancy on an older adult psychiatric ward. BMJ
Hospital stays after trauma are not related to the severity of illness: Open Qual 2018;7:e000149.
let's aim to the right target! JAMA Surg 2013;148:956–61. 41 Boyd SS. Hospital administrators' strategies for reducing
12 Challis D, Hughes J, Xie C, et al. An examination of factors delayed Hospital discharges and improving profitability. Walden
influencing delayed discharge of older people from hospital. Int J Dissertations and Doctoral Studies 2017:1.
Geriatr Psychiatry 2014;29:160–8. 42 Caminiti C, Meschi T, Braglia L, et al. Reducing unnecessary
13 Costa AP, Hirdes JP. Clinical characteristics and service needs Hospital days to improve quality of care through physician
of Alternate-Level-of-Care patients waiting for long-term care in accountability: a cluster randomised trial. BMC Health Serv Res
Ontario hospitals. Healthc Policy 2010;6:32–46. 2013;13:14.
14 Costa AP, Poss JW, Peirce T, et al. Acute care inpatients with long- 43 Patel H, Yirdaw E, Yu A, et al. Improving early discharge using a
term delayed-discharge: evidence from a Canadian health region. team-based structure for discharge multidisciplinary rounds. Prof
BMC Health Serv Res 2012;12:172. Case Manag 2019;24:83–9.
15 Kozyrskyi A, De Coster C, St John P. Long stay patients in Winnipeg 44 Ali Pirani SS. Prevention of delay in the patient discharge process:
acute care hospitals. Healthc Manage Forum 2002;Suppl:15–20. an emphasis on nurses' role. J Nurses Staff Dev 2010;26:E1–5.
16 Lorenzo RD, Formicola V, Carra E, et al. Risk factors for long-stay in 45 Sutherland J, Crump R. Alternative Level of Care: Canada’s Hospital
an Italian acute psychiatric ward: a 7-year retrospective analysis. J Beds, the Evidence and Options. Hcpol 2013;9:26–34.
Nurs Educ Pract 2013;4:p68. 46 Anonymous. Patient flow initiatives decrease LOS, up capacity.
17 Rogers A, Clark EH, Rittenhouse K, et al. Breaking down the Hosp Case Manag 2010;18:117–24.
barriers! factors contributing to barrier days in a mature trauma 47 Brankline AL, Coyle CM, Jencks KA, et al. Practical innovations:
center. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2014;76:191–5. technology-assisted referrals. Soc Work Health Care
18 Mitchell F, Gilmour M, McLaren G. Hospital discharge: a descriptive 2009;48:768–76.
study of the patient journey for frail older people with complex 48 Henwood M. Effective partnership working: a case study of hospital
needs. J Integr Care 2010;18:30–6. discharge. Health Soc Care Community 2006;14:400–7.
19 Tan WS, Chong WF, Chua KSG, et al. Factors associated with 49 Maloney CG, Wolfe D, Gesteland PH, et al. A tool for improving
delayed discharges after inpatient stroke rehabilitation in Singapore. patient discharge process and hospital communication practices:
Ann Acad Med Singap 2010;39:435–41. the "Patient Tracker". AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2007:493–7.
50 Roberts K, Stiller K, Harling R, et al. Impacts and perceptions of a 76 Mahto R, Venugopal H, Vibhuti VS, et al. The effectiveness of a
computer-based length of stay benchmarking program. Int J Ther hospital diabetes outreach service in supporting care for acutely
Rehabil 2013;20:237–45. admitted patients with diabetes. QJM 2009;102:203–7.
51 Sobotka SA, Agrawal RK, Msall ME. Prolonged hospital discharge 77 Meehan L, Banarsee R, Dunn-Toroosian V, et al. Improving
for children with technology dependency: a source of health care outcomes for patients discharged early using a home assessment
disparities. Pediatr Ann 2017;46:e365–70. scheme. London J Prim Care 2018;10:62–7.
52 Williams TA, Leslie GD, Brearley L, et al. Discharge delay, room for 78 Panis LJGG, Verheggen FWSM, Pop P, et al. The impact of hospital
improvement? Aust Crit Care 2010;23:141–9. discharge on inappropriate hospital stay. Int J Health Care Qual
53 Younis J, Salerno G, Fanto D, et al. Focused preoperative patient Assur Inc Leadersh Health Serv 2004;17:189–93.
stoma education, prior to ileostomy formation after anterior 79 Sampson MJ, Crowle T, Dhatariya K, et al. Trends in bed occupancy
resection, contributes to a reduction in delayed discharge for inpatients with diabetes before and after the introduction
within the enhanced recovery programme. Int J Colorectal Dis of a diabetes inpatient specialist nurse service. Diabet Med
2012;27:1–5. 2006;23:1008–15.
54 Chidwick P, Oliver J, Ball D, et al. Six change ideas that significantly 80 Starr-Hemburrow L, Parks JM, Bisaillon S. Home first: reducing
minimize alternate level of care (alc) days in acute care hospitals. ALC and achieving better outcomes for seniors through inter-
Healthc Q 2017;20:37–43. organizational collaboration. Healthc Q 2011;14:70–6.
55 Baumann M, Evans S, Perkins M, et al. Organisation and features 81 Taber DJ, Pilch NA, McGillicuddy JW, et al. Improved patient
of hospital, intermediate care and social services in English sites safety and outcomes with a comprehensive interdisciplinary
with low rates of delayed discharge. Health Soc Care Community improvement initiative in kidney transplant recipients. Am J Med
2007;15:295–305. Qual 2013;28:103–12.
56 Burr E, Dickau S. Leading practices in alternate levels of care (alc) 82 Udayai K, Kumar P. Implementing six sigma to improve hospital
avoidance: a standardized approach. Hcq 2017;20:44–7. discharge process. Int J Pharm Sci Res 2012;3:4528–32.
57 Holland DE, Pacyna JE, Gillard KL. Tracking discharge delays: 83 Calveley P. Doing, not talking: hospital admission avoidance.
critical first step toward mitigating process Breakdowns and Nursing and Residential Care 2007;9:230–2.
Inefficiencies. J Nurs Care Qual 2016;31:17–23. 84 Central East LHIN ALC Task Group. Alternate level of care systems
58 Lian YC, Ying SHK, Peng CC, et al. Early discharge study issues and recommendations. Ontario, Canada, 2008.
for premature infants: Singapore General Hospital. Perm J 85 Joint Improvement Team. Home First - Ten Actions to Transform
2008;12:15–18. Discharge. United Kingdom, 2013.
59 Mahant S, Peterson R, Campbell M, et al. Reducing inappropriate 86 Krystal A. Southlake at home Webinar. Canada, 2019.
hospital use on a general pediatric inpatient unit. Pediatrics 87 LHIN Collaborative. Sharing Best Practices: Transition Management
2008;121:e1068–73. in Ontario - Home First: Implementation Guide and Toolkit. Ontario,
60 Moeller JJ, Ma M, Hernandez P, et al. Discharge delay in patients Canada, 2011.
with community-acquired pneumonia managed on a critical 88 North West Community Care Access Centre. Wait at home fact
pathway. Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol 2006;17:109–13. sheet. Ontario, Canada, 2011.
89 Shah N. A new philosophy towards solving the alc crisis (home first.
61 Mur-Veeman I, Govers M. Buffer management to solve bed-
Ontario, Canada, 2010.
blocking in the Netherlands 2000-2010. Cooperation from an
90 Shah N. A call to action on ER/ALC: promoting effective care across
integrated care chain perspective as a key success factor for
the health continuum. Ontario, Canada, 2011.
managing patient flows. Int J Integr Care 2011;11:e080.
91 Starr-Hemburrow L. Home First - Optimizing Patient Flow and
62 Niemeijer GC, Trip A, Ahaus KTB, et al. Quality in trauma care:
Patient Centred Care Canada, 2010.
improving the discharge procedure of patients by means of lean six
92 Province of New Brunswick. Health annual report 2016-2017. New
sigma. J Trauma 2010;69:614–9.
Brunswick, Canada, 2017.
63 Ardagh MW, Tonkin G, Possenniskie C. Improving acute patient flow
93 Behan D. Delayed transfers of care — an early review of progress. J
and resolving emergency department overcrowding in New Zealand
Integr Care 2005;13:43–8.
hospitals--the major challenges and the promising initiatives. N Z 94 Levin KA, Crighton E. Measuring the impact of step down
Med J 2011;124:64–73. intermediate care on delayed discharge: an interrupted time series
64 Brown I, Jellish WS, Kleinman B, et al. Use of postanesthesia analysis. J Epidemiol Community Health 2019;73:674–9.
discharge criteria to reduce discharge delays for inpatients in the 95 Manville M, Klein MC, Bainbridge L. Improved outcomes for elderly
postanesthesia care unit. J Clin Anesth 2008;20:175–9. patients who received care on a transitional care unit. Can Fam
65 Gutmanis I, Speziale J, Bussel L, et al. The South West local health Physician 2014;60:e263–71.
integration network behavioural supports Ontario experience. Hcq 96 Rae B, Busby W, Millard PH. Fast-tracking acute hospital care -
2016;18:50–6. from bed crisis to bed crisis. Aust. Health Review 2007;31:50–62.
66 Lees-Deutsch L, Jackson J, Balaji A, et al. Developing a process 97 Shah A. The impact of the community care (delayed discharge) act
for Criteria-Led discharge: selection of patients for efficient and 2003 on the length of stay and bed occupancy in old age psychiatry
effective discharge (speed). J Nurs Care Qual 2020;35:35:140–6. units in England. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2007;22:1164–5.
67 Toronto Central Community Care Access Centre. ALC avoidance 98 Adams S. Care & Repair England. Reducing Delayed Transfer of
leading practices and improvement strategies for the acute care Care through housing interventions: Evidence of Impact. United
sector. Ontario, Canada, 2015. Kingdom, 2017.
68 Arendts G, Fitzhardinge S, Pronk K, et al. Front-loading allied health 99 Expedited discharge fund helps uninsured patients. Plan frees up
intervention in the emergency department does not reduce length of beds for patients who can pay. Hosp Case Manag 2008;16:70–5.
stay for admitted older patients. Int J Clin Pract 2013;67:807–10. 100 Manzano-Santaella A. Payment by results and delayed discharges.
69 Béland F, Bergman H, Lebel P, et al. A system of integrated care for Bri J Healthcare Manag 2009;15:440–3.
older persons with disabilities in Canada: results from a randomized 101 Gaughan J, Gravelle H, Siciliani L. Testing the bed-blocking
controlled trial. J Gerontol A-Biol 2006;61:367–73. hypothesis: does nursing and care home supply reduce delayed
70 Blecker S, Goldfeld K, Park H, et al. Impact of an intervention to Hospital discharges? Health Econ 2015;24(Suppl 1):32–44.
improve weekend hospital care at an academic medical center: an 102 Katsaliaki K, Brailsford S, Browning D, et al. Mapping care
observational study. J Gen Intern Med 2015;30:1657–64. pathways for the elderly. J Health Organ Manag 2005;19:57–72.
71 Boutette M, Hoffer A, Plant J, et al. Establishing an integrated 103 Qin S, Thompson C, Bogomolov T, et al. Hospital occupancy
model of subacute care for the frail elderly. Healthc Manage Forum and discharge strategies: a simulation-based study. Intern Med J
2018;31:133–6. 2017;47:894–9.
72 Bowen A, Kumar R, Howard J, et al. Nurse led discharge: improving 104 NHS Improvement. Guide to reducing long Hospital stays. United
efficiency, safely. Clin Govern Int J 2014;19:110–6. Kingdom, 2018.
73 El-Eid GR, Kaddoum R, Tamim H, et al. Improving hospital 105 Hamilton AB, Finley EP. Qualitative methods in implementation
discharge time: a successful implementation of six sigma research: an introduction. Psychiatry Res 2019;280:112516.
methodology. Medicine 2015;94:e633. 106 Southam-Gerow MA, Dorsey S. Qualitative and mixed methods
74 Graham L, Neal CP, Garcea G, et al. Evaluation of nurse-led research in dissemination and implementation science: introduction
discharge following laparoscopic surgery. J Eval Clin Pract to the special issue. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol 2014;43:845–50.
2012;18:19–24. 107 Qualitative Research in Implementation Science group. Qualitative
75 Maessen JMC, Dejong CHC, Kessels AGH, et al. Length of stay: methods in implementation science. United States: National Cancer
an inappropriate readout of the success of enhanced recovery Institute, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences,
programs. World J Surg 2008;32:971–5. 2019: 1–31.
108 Shelton RC, Cooper BR, Stirman SW. The sustainability of 111 Balasubramanian BA, Cohen DJ, Davis MM, et al. Learning
evidence-based interventions and practices in public health and evaluation: blending quality improvement and implementation
health care. Annu Rev Public Health 2018;39:55–76. research methods to study healthcare innovations. Implementation
109 Geerligs L, Rankin NM, Shepherd HL, et al. Hospital-based Sci 2015;10:31.
interventions: a systematic review of staff-reported barriers and 112 Glasby J, Littlechild R, Pryce K. Show me the way to go home: a
facilitators to implementation processes. Implementation Sci narrative review of the literature on delayed Hospital discharges and
2018;13:36. older people. Br J Soc Work 2004;34:1189–97.
110 Green LW, Glasgow RE. Evaluating the relevance, generalization, 113 Zhao G, Kennedy C, Mabaya G, et al. Patient engagement in the
and applicability of research: issues in external validation and development of best practices for transitions from hospital to home:
translation methodology. Eval Health Prof 2006;29:126–53. a scoping review. BMJ Open 2019;9:e029693.