Paper 4
Paper 4
Paper 4
Available at www.ijsred.com
RESEARCH ARTICLE OPEN ACCESS
tells that the model is quite efficient and thus Thus, the table2 shows the predicted value of
most of the data contributes for the prediction. nitrogen when the other parameters temperature,
moisture, pH and conductivity given as input.
TABLE 1 Thetable3 shows predicted value of potassium when
CONTRIBUTION OF EACH VARIABLE
the other parameters like the temperature,
moisture,pHand conductivity given as
Estimated standard error t value pr(<|t|)
input.Thetable4shows the predicted the value of
Intercept 530.009 161.064 3.291 0.00141 **
phosphorous aswhen the other parameters
temperature, moisture,pH and conductivity given as
Temperature 5.737 3.364 1.706 0.09137 * input.Henceforth, the predicted values could be
compared with the dataset values to the efficiency of
Moisture 6.826 1.36 5.02 2.44-e06 *** the model.
pH 33.796 10.483 3.224 0.00174 **
TABLE 3
THE PREDICTED VALUES OF PHOSPHOROUS
Temperature Moisture pH Conductivity Phosphorous
25 99 5 0.31 353.25
21 84 5.1 0.36 214.37
24 93 5.2 0.32 309.94
18 73 5.1 0.34 128.85
20 83 4 0.24 205.25
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The authors sincerely thank the Science and
Engineering Research Board (SERB)for the
financial support, the Director, ICAR-SBI,
Coimbatore, and the Management and Principal of
Sri Ramakrishna Engineering College, Coimbatore
for extending the required facilities for this study.
REFERENCES
[1] C.Wu, etal “Evaluating soil nutrients of DacrydiumpectinatuminChina
using machine learning techniques”, InternationalJournal of forest
Fig.3 Predicted graph of Potassium ecosystems, Volume 6, Issue 7,2020.
[8] S.Ghosh and S.Koley, “Machine Learning for Soil Fertility and Plant
Nutrient Management using Back Propagation Neural Networks”,
International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and
Communication(IJRITCC), Volume 2, Issue 2, pp.292-297, 2014.