Crafting a Literature Review: Challenges and Solutions

Embarking on the journey of writing a literature review can be a daunting task for many individuals.
It's not just about summarizing existing research; it requires a meticulous analysis, synthesis, and
interpretation of numerous scholarly sources to provide a comprehensive understanding of a
particular topic or research question. However, amidst the intricacies and challenges, there are
solutions that can ease this process.

The Complexity of Literature Review Writing:

1. Information Overload: With the abundance of scholarly articles, books, and other resources
available, sifting through the vast sea of information to find relevant sources can be
overwhelming.
2. Critical Analysis: Evaluating the credibility, reliability, and relevance of each source requires
a discerning eye and critical thinking skills. It's not merely about summarizing but also about
analyzing the strengths and weaknesses of existing research.
3. Synthesis of Ideas: Integrating diverse perspectives and findings from various sources into a
cohesive narrative requires careful planning and organization. It's essential to identify
common themes, debates, and gaps in the literature to construct a coherent argument.
4. Time Constraints: Writing a literature review demands a significant investment of time and
effort. From conducting thorough research to drafting and revising multiple iterations, the
process can be time-consuming and exhausting.
5. Structural Complexity: Balancing the need for breadth and depth in coverage while
maintaining a clear and logical structure poses a considerable challenge. Arranging ideas in a
meaningful sequence and ensuring smooth transitions between paragraphs can be tricky.

Solutions:

1. Strategic Research: Instead of aimlessly searching for information, develop a clear research
question or focus to guide your search. Utilize databases, academic journals, and citation
indexes to efficiently locate relevant sources.
2. Critical Thinking Skills: Sharpen your critical thinking skills by questioning the
methodology, biases, and limitations of each study. Engage in discussions with peers or seek
feedback from mentors to refine your analytical abilities.
3. Organizational Tools: Use note-taking techniques, such as annotated bibliographies or
concept maps, to organize your thoughts and synthesize key ideas from different sources.
Creating an outline can also help in structuring your literature review effectively.
4. Time Management: Break down the writing process into manageable tasks and set realistic
deadlines for each stage. Prioritize tasks based on their importance and allocate sufficient
time for thorough research, writing, and revision.
5. Seeking Assistance: Recognize when you need help and don't hesitate to seek assistance
from academic support services or professional writing services like ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔.
Professional writers can offer expert guidance, editing, and proofreading services to enhance
the quality of your literature review.

In conclusion, while writing a literature review may present numerous challenges, it's essential to
approach the task with patience, perseverance, and a strategic mindset. By employing effective
research strategies, honing critical thinking skills, and utilizing organizational tools, you can navigate
through the complexities of literature review writing with confidence and proficiency.
For professional assistance with your literature review or any other academic writing needs, consider
reaching out to ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔. Our team of experienced writers is dedicated to providing high-
quality, customized solutions to help you succeed in your academic endeavors.
To illustrate this point, consider the anonymized transcript excerpt presented in Appendix 1, which is
taken from a research interview conducted by one of the authors (J.S.). We refer to this excerpt
throughout the remainder of this paper to illustrate how data can be managed, analyzed, and
presented. Relevant past research is selected and synthesized into a coherent discussion. From the
selected databases, the search retrieved a total of 765 publications. In Cloud computing multiple
cloud users can request number of cloud services simultaneously. Analysis and Evaluation This is
usually the hardest part of the. Coding can be done by hand on a hard copy of the transcript, by
making notes in the margin or by highlighting and naming sections of text. The different
philosophical underpinnings of the various qualitative. Pros: comes with many pre-made concept
map templates to get you started Cons: not all features are available in the free version Explore
Canva concept map templates here. Learning to read critically in language and literacy Aims to
develop skills of critical analysis and research design. Qualitative research has been used by
pharmacists to explore a variety of questions and problems (see the “Further Reading” section for
examples). Moreover, significance, advantages and limitations of using Resource Allocation in Cloud
computing systems is also discussed. The simplest definition of a critical approach to literature is: the
lens through which we understand a piece of writing. In a nutshell, a comprehensive portrayal of the
research process (from the context of research to the research objectives, research questions and
design, speculative foundations, and from approaches of collecting data to analyzing the results, to
deriving inferences) frequently proliferates the quality of a qualitative research. You will need to
search the cognate literature before claiming there is “little previous research” on your topic. This
level of transparency contributes to the trustworthiness and credibility of qualitative research. There
are a number of pauses in the narrative that might suggest the participant is finding it difficult to
recall that experience. What type of literature review do you think this study is and why. An rQES
typically focuses on direct evidence, except when only indirect evidence is available 28 ( table 2,
item R4). Books and resources on reading critically CASP Checklists Critical appraisal tools
designed to be used when reading research. Write a Literature Review in 30 Minutes or Less STEP.
I recently married my wife, Kaajal, who was born and raised in London. A combination of such
checklists might be appropriate for novice researchers. Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to
jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. These beliefs govern how the
researcher perceives and acts. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to
distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works
on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any
changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See:. Statistics from Altmetric.com Request
permissions. Federal government websites often end in.gov or.mil. Before sharing sensitive
information, make sure you’re on a federal government site. For example, the title of the research
report by Thurston and others, 7 “Discordant indigenous and provider frames explain challenges in
improving access to arthritis care: a qualitative study using constructivist grounded theory,” indicates
at least 2 theoretical standpoints. Zafar A Reshi Department of Botany University of Kashmir
Srinagar. To be observed in written reports and oral presentations, and. You may choose from
the.docx Choose an ethical issue to write about.
This paper presents a systematic review and analytical comparisons of existing surveys, research
work exists on SLA, resource allocation and resource scheduling in cloud computing. I recently
married my wife, Kaajal, who was born and raised in London. Based on different studies considered,
it is observed that different schemes did not consider some important parameters and enhancement is
required to improve the performance of the existing schemes. The schedule of questions for interview
or the protocol for non-interview data collection should be provided, available or discussed in the
paper. In general, qualitative research tends to come from a very different paradigmatic stance and
intrinsically demands distinctive and out-of-the-ordinary criteria for evaluating good research and
varieties of research contributions that can be made. Involvement of an information specialist,
especially in prioritising databases, targeting grey literature and planning supplemental searches, can
prove invaluable. As a study of the research on a particular topic, it is arranged by key themes or
findings, which may lead up to or link to the research question. Through clear referencing provide an
opportunity for others to follow up the cited work and 6. The work further goes on to juxtapose the
various resource allocation strategies in order to identify their strengths and weakness based on how
well they avoid situations such as resource under provisioning, over provisioning, contention,
fragmentation and scarcity. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the
content in many different ways. To help you critique a qualitative research paper some guidance is
provided in table 4. The foregoing limerick was used some years ago by Professor. Plainly, you can
use a search engine such as Google or Yahoo! Analytical framework aids in identification of issues.
The CQIMG endorses three types of synthesis; thematic synthesis, framework synthesis and meta-
ethnography ( box 1 ). 43 44 Rapid QES favour descriptive thematic synthesis 45 or framework
synthesis, 46 47 except when theory generation (meta-ethnography 48 49 or analytical thematic
synthesis) is a priority ( table 2, item R17). Rather, interpretative phenomenological analysis is about
getting underneath what a person is saying to try to truly understand the world from his or her
perspective. Methods describes the method followed for performing this review. Bensalem Township
School District and TELEOS What is Emotional Intelligence (EI) and how is it relevant to
leadership. Purpose and question The topic under investigation in the study should be guided by a
clear research question or a statement of the problem or purpose. Owing to the sensitivity of the
worth of qualitative research towards the specific context and the type of paradigmatic stance,
researchers should themselves analyze what approaches can be and must be tailored to ensemble the
distinct characteristics of the phenomenon under investigation. How do viewpoint and bias affect our
perception of reality. A Training Program Designed to Improve Emotional Intelligence and
Leadership Skills for Teachers. It’s important to note that not every systematic review includes a
meta-analysis but a meta-analysis can’t exist without a systematic review of the literature. And why
is a systematic review considered to be so good. Secondly, we performed a structural analysis on
different author's prominent contributions in the form of tabulation by categories and graphical
representation. There are a number of ways in which researchers can synthesize and present their
findings, but any conclusions drawn by the researchers must be supported by direct quotations from
the participants. Points will be lost for not meeting any of the above criteria. The paper should
explain when and how the study was advertised, participants were recruited and consented. Research
Guides: Literature Reviews: Concept Mapping A concept map or mind map is a visual representation
of knowledge that illustrates relationships between concepts or ideas. In summary, the review team
should consider privileging rich qualitative studies 2; consider a stepwise approach to inclusion of
qualitative data and explore the possibility of sampling ( table 2, item R5).
Exemplifying how research on Resource Allocation, Resource Scheduling and Resource
management has progressively increased in the past decade by inspecting articles, papers from
scientific and standard publications. I recently married my wife, Kaajal, who was born and raised in
London. Thus, when the findings are organized for presentation, each theme can become the
heading of a section in the report or presentation. In addition, like any other utility, payment is done
on a pay-per-use model thus reducing the huge initial cost of acquiring on-premise IT infrastructure.
Improving Quality: Strategies Another critical question is “How can the qualitative researchers
ensure that the abovementioned quality criteria can be met?” Lincoln and Guba ( 1986 ) delineated
several strategies to intensify each criteria of trustworthiness. It’s all about relationships: a qualitative
study of health researchers’ perspectives on interdisciplinary research. If this is the case, the author(s)
should make this clear. Theoretical and conceptual frameworks connect the researcher to existing
knowledge and these are used in a study to help to explain and understand what is being
investigated. The existence of methodological diversity led to the formulation of different sets of
criteria applicable to qualitative research. The entries in Table 4 are based on Tracy’s “Eight big?tent
criteria for excellent qualitative research” (Tracy, 2010 ). Such theories are helpful to researchers, as
they enable us to think about things from a different perspective. It can be used in pharmacy practice
research to explore how patients feel about their health and their treatment. Utilize a wide range of
materials; may not evaluate the quality of the studies as much as count the number. In particular, the
article should begin with an introduction, including a literature review and rationale for the research.
The work further goes on to juxtapose the various resource allocation strategies in order to identify
their strengths and weakness based on how well they avoid situations such as resource under
provisioning, over provisioning, contention, fragmentation and scarcity. Video Say more by
seamlessly including video within your publication. Learning to read critically in language and
literacy Aims to develop skills of critical analysis and research design. Results from experimental
animal studies indicate the negative impact of e-cigarette exposure on test models, such as
ascytotoxicity, oxidative stress, inflammation, airway hyper reactivity, airway remodeling, mucin
production, apoptosis, and emphysematous changes. For more description of systematic reviews,
including links to protocols, checklists, workflow processes, and structure see “ A Young
Researcher’s Guide to a Systematic Review “. The foregoing limerick was used some years ago by
Professor. Using such software for all general QES processes ( table 2, item R20), and then
harnessing these skills and tools when specifically under resource pressures, is a sounder strategy.
Learning Comes Quickly With a modest investment of time. It is also possible to use different types
of research in the same study, an approach known as “mixed methods” research, and further reading
on this topic may be found at the end of this paper. As we suggested in our earlier article, 1 an
important point about qualitative research is that there is no attempt to generalize the findings to a
wider population. Moreover, for evaluating qualitative research, quantitative conceptualizations of
reliability and validity are proven to be incompatible (Horsburgh, 2003 ). You must have a valid
academic email address to sign up. Within the context of pharmacy practice research, qualitative
approaches have been used to examine a diverse array of topics, including the perceptions of key
stakeholders regarding prescribing by pharmacists and the postgraduation employment experiences
of young pharmacists (see “Further Reading” section at the end of this article). So there must be a
provision that all resources are made available to requesting users in an efficient manner to satisfy
their needs. At the graduate or doctoral level, the literature review is an essential feature of thesis
and dissertation, as well as grant proposal writing. Students aren’t just talking about their discontent
with education but walking it, too.