Title: Sample of Literature Review in Research Papers

When it comes to crafting a literature review for your research paper, many scholars and students
find themselves facing a daunting task. A literature review is not merely a summary of existing
research; it requires a comprehensive understanding of the chosen topic, critical analysis of various
sources, and the ability to synthesize information effectively. As such, it's no surprise that many
individuals struggle with this crucial aspect of academic writing.

The difficulty of writing a literature review stems from several factors. Firstly, there is the sheer
volume of literature available on most topics. Navigating through numerous scholarly articles, books,
and other sources can be overwhelming, especially for those new to academic research. Additionally,
identifying relevant sources and determining their credibility requires a keen eye and considerable
time investment.

Moreover, crafting a literature review requires more than just summarizing existing research. It
involves critically evaluating each source's methodology, findings, and relevance to your research
question. This analytical process demands both attention to detail and a deep understanding of the
subject matter.

Furthermore, synthesizing the information gathered from various sources into a coherent narrative is
a challenging task. A literature review should not read like a laundry list of studies but should instead
provide a cohesive overview of the existing literature, highlighting key themes, debates, and gaps in
knowledge.

Given the complexities involved in writing a literature review, many individuals seek assistance to
ensure they produce high-quality work. ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ offers a solution for those grappling
with this aspect of academic writing. With a team of experienced writers well-versed in various
fields, ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ can provide customized literature reviews tailored to your specific
requirements.

By ordering from ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔, you can alleviate the stress and uncertainty associated with
writing a literature review. Their expert writers will conduct thorough research, critically analyze
relevant sources, and synthesize the information into a cohesive review that meets the highest
academic standards.

In conclusion, writing a literature review for a research paper can be a challenging endeavor,
requiring a combination of research skills, critical thinking, and synthesis abilities. For those in need
of assistance, ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ offers a reliable solution to ensure your literature review is well-
crafted and academically rigorous.
If you cite the selected sources at the initial stage, you will find it easier to create your annotated
bibliography later on. You have to present all relevant ideas of significance in the field, showing how
the authors are related. Every writer holds a degree and knows authoritative literature in their
subject. What sources have they cited to support their conclusions. More and more cultural studies
scholars are accepting popular media as a subject worthy of academic consideration. The extracted
data were synthesised using descriptive and narrative techniques to identify themes and patterns in
the data linked to intervention strategies, targeted behaviours, study settings and study outcomes. To
begin organising your literature review’s argument and structure, you need to understand the
connections and relationships between the sources you’ve read. They originated from criticisms of
positivist systematic reviews which centre on their “simplistic” underlying assumptions ( Oates, 2011
). Comprehensive knowledge of the literature of the field is essential to most research papers. Other
times, the author may have to seek examples to prove their point. Once you’ve done that, give your
writing to a friend or colleague who is not a subject matter expert and ask them if they understand
the overall discussion. When you find a useful book or article, you can check the bibliography to
find other relevant sources. But few scientists are trained in how to write a review — or in what
constitutes an excellent one. Use these keywords in your search to narrow down your results. Write
the literature review: Start with an introduction that provides an overview of the topic and the
purpose of the literature review. A literature review is structured differently from an original research
article. Involvement of an information specialist, especially in prioritising databases, targeting grey
literature and planning supplemental searches, can prove invaluable. The subsections might include
how they are personified, how their proportions are exaggerated, and their behaviors misunderstood.
Step 4: Identify Relationships, Key Ideas, and Gaps Before you can move on to outlining and
writing your literature review, the final step is determining the relationships between the studies that
already exist. Thematic: If you have found some recurring central themes that you will continue
working with throughout your piece, you can organize your literature review into subsections that
address different aspects of the topic. Based on your reading and notes, you can look for: Trends
and patterns (in theory, method or results): do certain approaches become more or less popular over
time. This is mind blowing, the detailed explanation and simplicity is perfect. Count on our literature
review writing service to get it done. Download citation Received: 11 April 2023 Accepted: 03
January 2024 Published: 17 February 2024 DOI: Share this article Anyone you share the following
link with will be able to read this content: Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this
article. Taxonomies of implementation strategies do not fully account for the complex process of
implementation, which involves a range of different actors with different capacities and skills across
multiple system levels. The team seeks to align the review question and the requirements of the
knowledge user with available time and resources. This will help you identify relevant literature and
determine the scope of your review. There are four points which may help account for the
differences in findings in this regard. To reduce the risk of bias, papers were excluded following
discussion between all members of the team. 32 papers met the inclusion criteria and proceeded to
data extraction. Below, we summarize this article, which scientifically investigates the old saying
“an apple a day keeps the doctor away.” Davis et al. (2015) set out to empirically test the popular
saying “an apple a day keeps the doctor away.” Apples are often used to represent a healthy lifestyle,
and research has shown their nutritional properties could be beneficial for various aspects of health.
The 2011 review identified a further 13 systematic reviews containing 313 discrete primary studies.
In clinical or biomedical journals less rich findings may be placed within a single table or box. Be
sure to use terminology familiar to your audience; get rid of unnecessary jargon or slang. Chapter 5
shows you how to use EndNote, one example of reference management software. Summarize and
Synthesize Remember to summarize and synthesize your sources within each thematic paragraph as
well as throughout the review. It takes into account the context and complexities of real-world
situations. Literature reviews introducing research articles The literature review found at the
beginning of a journal article is used to introduce research related to the specific study and is found
in the Introduction section, usually near the end. In what ways might geographers view the need for
better distribution of social service agencies in large cities than how social workers might study the
issue. Unlike other review types, critical reviews attempt to take a reflective account of the research
that has been done in a particular area of interest, and assess its credibility by using appraisal
instruments or critical interpretive methods. USC Libraries Research Guides Organizing Your Social
Sciences Research Paper 5. If your lit review is a standalone piece, the introduction and conclusion
take up more space and give you a place to discuss your goals, research methods, and conclusions
separately from where you discuss the literature itself. Completing the Thesis Statement will help to
guide the contents of the Literary Review Outline. Keeping your literature review around 15-30% of
your entire paper is recommended if you haven't been provided with specific guidelines. The best
way to assess this is to ask them to explain the chapter back to you. How to structure a literature
review for an article When writing a literature review as part of an introduction to a study, simply
follow the structure of the Introduction and move from the general to the specific—presenting the
broadest background information about a topic first and then moving to specific studies that support
your rationale, finally leading to your hypothesis statement. Create an organizational method to focus
this section even further. BMC Res Notes. 2011;4:212.. Article PubMed PubMed Central Google
Scholar Grimshaw JM, Shirran L, Thomas R, Mowatt G, Fraser C, Bero L, et al. The customers’
perception of servicescape’s influence on their behaviours, in the food retail industry: Dublin
Business School 2015 Coughlan, Ray (2015) What was the role of leadership in the transformation
of a failing Irish Insurance business. Senior leaders include formal representatives of organizations
(executives, politicians, or formal managers) and formal or respected leaders of communities. We’ve
written a step-by-step guide that you can follow below. In addressing these points, you argue for
your place in the conversation, which tends to make the lit review more compelling than a simple
reporting of other sources. To achieve this ambitious objective, the authors performed a bibliometric
analysis of medical informatics citations indexed in medline using publication trends, journal
frequencies, impact factors, Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) term frequencies, and characteristics
of citations. Moreover, outlining allows you to learn specific things about your chosen sources. CH is
co-convenor of the Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group. Sometimes, though,
you might need to add additional sections that are necessary for your study, but do not fit in the
organizational strategy of the body. Sort through other current bibliographies or literature reviews in
the field to get a sense of what your discipline expects. It is shorter than a stand-alone review
because it must be limited to very specific studies and theories that are directly relevant to the
current study. What are the key concepts and how are they defined. Integrative Review Considered a
form of research that reviews, critiques, and synthesizes representative literature on a topic in an
integrated way such that new frameworks and perspectives on the topic are generated. Thematic:
Thematic reviews of literature are organized around a topic or issue, rather than the progression of
time.
Co-creating services—conceptual clarification, forms and outcomes. Systematic Approaches to a
Successful Literature Review. A thesis statement within a literary review should present the theme,
debate, or trend that makes up the topic of the literary review. Let's take a closer look at this with
our custom essay writer. Reveals the main points of controversy and gaps within a topic. The basic
research question — what works? — which is usually associated with systematic reviews changes
to: what is it about this intervention that works, for whom, in what circumstances, in what respects
and why. USC Libraries Research Guides Organizing Your Social Sciences Research Paper 5. Earlier
in this guide, we suggested some engaging topics to guide your search. If it’s necessary to be
considered, specify the type needed and add an annotated bibliography example, if any. A literature
or narrative review is a comprehensive review and analysis of the published literature on a specific
topic or research question. Project leaders are responsible for overall project management, including
the setting of goals, objectives, and timelines. They reported that the use of social media resulted in a
significant improvement in knowledge and compliance with evidence-based guidelines compared
with more traditional methods. The differing positive outcomes for educational strategies aimed at
nurses might indicate that the target audience is important. Evaluate sources. Identify themes,
debates and gaps. Step 5: Make an Outline Although students tend to neglect this stage, outlining is
one of the most important steps in writing every academic paper. Add Links Send readers directly to
specific items or pages with shopping and web links. The complexity of coproduction leadership
practices Our findings indicate that the leadership of coproduction practices entails challenging and
complex tasks. To inform research design: A literature review can inform the design of your research
study by identifying appropriate research methods, data sources, and research questions. Facilitating
coproduction: the role of leadership in coproduction initiatives in the UK. Determine 2-3 important
concepts (depending on the length of your article) that are discussed in the literature; take notes
about all of the important aspects of this study relevant to the topic being reviewed. Literature
search -- finding materials relevant to the subject being explored. 3. Data evaluation -- determining
which literature makes a significant contribution to the understanding of the topic. 4. Analysis and
interpretation -- discussing the findings and conclusions of pertinent literature. And be sure to get
your citations in place early on. Ambassadors are individuals who have expertise and volunteer their
time to train others or work with clients in coproduced services. Thematic literature review: This
review identifies and analyzes common themes and patterns across a body of literature on a
particular topic. Lastly, a literature review should combine a summary with a synthesis of the
documents used. They were also categorized as either avoiding or not avoiding the use of healthcare
services in the past year. However, sometimes there are better alternatives we can use to structure the
body. Problem formulation -- which topic or field is being examined and what are its component
issues? 2. If you are writing the literature review section of a dissertation or research paper, you will
search for literature related to your research objectives and questions. But there is relatively no
continuity among subjects here.
In stand-alone reviews, there may be significantly more texts and more concepts. APA7 Style
resources APA Style Blog - for those harder to find answers 1. Step 3: Assess and Prioritize Sources
Throughout your research, you will likely find plenty of relevant literature to include in your
literature review. Ask your professor questions such as: “If you had to read only one book from the
90’s on topic X, what would it be?” Questions such as this help you to find and determine quickly
the most seminal pieces in the field. We also provided a set of reflective considerations that can help
all actors involved in this process make more deliberate choices regarding the parties involved,
leadership models of coproduction, and practices (Table 1 ). Some papers referred to traits and
characteristics exhibited by leaders that facilitate coproduction. Keeping the logical sequence is very
important, so having a good writing example will be a serious advantage. APA Citation Generator
MLA Citation Generator Finally, read through the article once more to ensure that: You’ve
accurately represented the author’s work You haven’t missed any essential information The phrasing
is not too similar to any sentences in the original. Make sure the sources you use are credible, and
make sure you read any landmark studies and major theories in your field of research. A thematic
review would have subtopics based upon factors that relate to the theme or issue. Time-limited:
Literature reviews can become quickly outdated as new research is published, making it difficult to
keep up with the latest developments in a field. If you want to make your research seem more
credible, then there is absolutely no option, except to understand in detail how to write a
methodology. For example, a literature review that focuses on continuing research about the
emergence of German economic power after the fall of the Soviet Union. How To Structure A
Literature Review (Free Template) Demonstrate your knowledge of the research topic. Meta-analyses
are regarded as powerful tools for deriving meaningful conclusions. You might have to write a
summary of a source: As a stand-alone assignment to prove you understand the material For your
own use, to keep notes on your reading To provide an overview of other researchers’ work in a
literature review In a paper, to summarize or introduce a relevant study To avoid plagiarism when
summarizing an article or other source, follow these two rules: Write the summary entirely in your
own words by paraphrasing the author’s ideas. Narrow your topic There are hundreds or even
thousands of articles and books on most areas of study. Writing experts from our service also ensure
a unique perspective on the subject. Stand-alone reviews are an excellent resource for researchers
when they are first searching for the most relevant information on an area of study. Follow the five
steps outlined below to write a good summary. Structure of a Literature Review How to structure a
literature review: Like many other types of academic writing, a literature review follows a typical
intro-body-conclusion style with 5 paragraphs overall. Similarly, some of these practices occur at
particular timepoints in a coproduction arc (namely, during the stages of initiation or
implementation), while others can occur at any or all timepoints (i.e., during the assimilation stage or
beyond). Conducting Research Literature Reviews: From the Internet to Paper. 2nd ed. Thousand
Oaks, CA: Sage, 2005; Hart, Chris. The dystopian literature is a very popular type of science fiction
that sometimes can also be crossed in the horror genre. I know it’s very tempting, but don’t try to kill
two birds with one stone and write as you read. In the last 36 months, she has received honoraria
from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and travel support from the WHO.
Chronologically Breaking down your sources based on their publication date is a solid way to keep a
correct historical timeline. They can also be part of a larger work or stand on their own. Thematic: If
you have found some recurring central themes that you will continue working with throughout your
piece, you can organize your literature review into subsections that address different aspects of the
topic. Earlier in this guide, we already discussed the basic structure of a literature review and gave
you an example of a good outline.
Check out Scribbr’s professional proofreading services. Providing information about conceptual
limitations is also important for readers to judge the quality of foundations of the research. Questions
for Further Research: What questions about the field has the review sparked. A literature review is
important because it: Explains the background of research on a topic. Try to get as detailed as
possible, so that you know exactly what you’ll cover where, how each section will connect to the
next, and how your entire argument will develop throughout the chapter. Helps to find out the key
themes, principles, concepts, and researchers that exist within a topic. Wrong’s model, the employee’s
behaviour is best influenced out of a belief in the. The individual component strategies of the toolkits
were highly variable though the authors suggest that they align most closely with educational
strategies. But there’s no need to worry about the quality of the writing if you get inspired by the
examples presented here. Interventions in health care professionals to improve treatment in children
with upper respiratory tract infections. Publication bias: Literature reviews may be influenced by
publication bias, which occurs when researchers are more likely to publish positive results than
negative ones. It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have
been peer-reviewed. We find that the most insightful systematic reviews of MFIs engage in
theoretical generalisation — they attempt to go beyond the data of individual studies and discuss the
wider implications of the findings of the studies within their reviews drawing on implementation
theory. See our academic resources for further advice on references in your paper, how to write an
abstract, how to write a research paper title, how to impress the editor of your target journal with a
perfect cover letter, and dozens of other research writing and publication topics. Coaching for
recovery: a quality improvement project in mental healthcare. Under this method, you would combine
the recent studies on American whaling in the 19th century with Moby Dick itself in the 1800-1899
category, even though the authors wrote a century apart. The authors here recapitulate important
features of Hamilton’s study, but then synthesize it by rephrasing the study’s significance and relating
it to their own work. Only include the most relevant and most important sources. Generally, for my
undergraduate research students, I recommend a narrative review, where themes can be generated in
order for the students to develop sufficient understanding of the topic so they can build upon the
themes using unique methods or novel research questions. It outlines the objectives of the review, the
research question or hypothesis, and the scope of the review. However, integration may not have
occurred at the analysis, interpretation and reporting levels. It also helps researchers to identify
relevant data sources and identify potential data analysis techniques. To get the most from the
literature review process, you must keep all four points front of mind as you review the literature
(more on this shortly), or you’ll land up with a wonky foundation. It should summarize the whole
text, not just introduce it. An organized and compiled list of source material makes notations easier
in the writing process. For example, weave references to other sources into what you are writing but
maintain your own voice by starting and ending the paragraph with your own ideas and wording.
These hacks help you understand how to prepare your literature research correctly, avoiding
numerous common mistakes. Does the work ultimately contribute in any significant way to an
understanding of the subject? II. The Higher Education Quality Council in London issued an even
stronger warning. How to write Literature Review Here are some steps to follow when writing a
literature review: Define your research question or topic: Before starting your literature review, it is
essential to define your research question or topic.
However, it’s also essential to remember examples of older studies and keep the balance between
them and the newer research. Public services management and co-production in multi-level
governance settings. This approach helps highlight ethical issues which you should be aware of and
consider as you go through your own study. To complete an RRL, you first need to collect relevant
literature; this can include online and offline sources. Their next merit is the writing techniques they
practice. Make a list of keywords Start by creating a list of keywords related to your research topic.
Integrating telecare for chronic disease management in the community: What needs to be done.
Literature Review Matrix 1 This PDF file provides a sample literature review matrix. For more
information, please see our handout on plagiarism. For tips on the revising and editing process, see
our handout on revising drafts. As each source has its own frame of reference for the MOP, it is
crucial to structure the review in the most logically consistent way possible. From the industrial age
on, the way organisations rated performance was to consult. By showcasing the various methods
used to portray the MOP, the writer can compare them based on things like severity, ethicality, and
overall impact. Because a field is constantly being updated by new work, you can show where your
research fits into this context and explain developments and trends in research. All your further steps
will be determined by this easy one that gives a general perspective. It aims to identify common
themes and patterns across different areas of research. Third, there are the perceptions, conclusions,
opinion, and interpretations that are shared informally among scholars that become part of the body
of epistemological traditions within the field. The template follows the standard best-practice
structure for formal academic research papers, so it is suitable for the vast majority of degrees,
particularly those within the sciences. Be Selective Select only the most important points in each
source to highlight in the review. We work both with traditional (MLA, APA, Chicago, etc.) and
custom ones as well. Advantages of Literature Review There are several advantages to conducting a
literature review as part of a research project, including: Establishing the significance of the research:
A literature review helps to establish the significance of the research by demonstrating the gap or
problem in the existing literature that the study aims to address. Are you an instructor who has
received an exemplary literature review and have permission from the student to post. A literature
review is an integrated analysis -- not just a summary-- of scholarly writings and other relevant
evidence related directly to your research question. Literature reviews are written occasionally in the
humanities, but mostly in the sciences and social sciences; in experiment and lab reports, they
constitute a section of the paper. Supporting arguments and claims: A literature review provides
evidence to support arguments and claims made in academic writing. A review team can use
templates to fast-track writing of a protocol. The basic research question — what works? — which is
usually associated with systematic reviews changes to: what is it about this intervention that works,
for whom, in what circumstances, in what respects and why. Given such mountains of papers,
scientists cannot be expected to examine in detail every single new paper relevant to their interests.
Cambridge guide to teaching English to speakers of other languages (Pp 137-143). Engaging patients
to improve quality of care: a systematic review.
PDF How to Write a Literature Review A literature review is a review or discussion of the current
published material available on a particular topic. Where plentiful reviews already exist, a team may
decide to conduct a review of reviews 5 by including multiple QES within a mega-synthesis 28 29 (
table 2, item R6). This can lead directly into your methodology section. Inclusion and exclusion
criteria must be established to help researchers eliminate studies that are not aligned with the research
questions. Typically, a literature review is a part of a larger paper, such as a thesis or dissertation.
Once the issue is clarified, sticking to it without giving any unnecessary information is essential.
Authors from our team are degree holders and also have considerable writing experience. Taken as a
whole, this may also then help in terms of how and when to conjoin single interventions into
effective MFIs. Yet Another Writing Tip When Do I Know I Can Stop Looking and Move On. Some
questions to ask: How are they organizing their ideas. Help Center Here you'll find an answer to
your question. Some default research instruments may not work, so searching for trends is a great
option. Your title must be typed with upper and lowercase letters and centered in the upper part of
the page; use no more than 12 words, and avoid using abbreviations and useless words. Five tips for
developing useful literature summary tables for writing For example, imagine the authors of an
article, included in a review, used phenomenological inquiry for their research. A distinction arises
between evaluation that aims to reflect status quo, and. Make sure to read the abstract to find out
whether an article is relevant to your question. Studies were not excluded in this updated overview
based on methodological quality as we aimed to reflect the full extent of current research into this
topic. After the introduction, it grounds your research in a scholarly field and leads directly to your
theoretical framework or methodology. The sources support what Falk and Mills are saying. The
cleanly formatted Google Doc can be downloaded as a fully editable MS Word Document (DOCX
format), so you can use it as-is or convert it to LaTeX. What are the strengths and weaknesses of the
research. There are some subject areas, in which the classic texts do not lose in their reliability even
after the centuries, while others require only cutting edge sources, not obsolete ones. Does the work
ultimately contribute in any significant way to an understanding of the subject? II. Use the
bibliographies and references of research studies you find to locate others. Look at sources the
authors cite to in their work. Wrong’s model, the employee’s behaviour is best influenced out of a
belief in the. For example: Look at what results have emerged in qualitative versus quantitative
research Discuss how the topic has been approached by empirical versus theoretical scholarship
Divide the literature into sociological, historical, and cultural sources Theoretical A literature review
is often the foundation for a theoretical framework. Use evidence In the example above, the writers
refer to several other sources when making their point. The number of studies included in the review
was low and so a conclusive recommendation could not be reached based on this review. Give a
thorough overview of each theme, integrating source data, and conclude with a summary of the
current state of knowledge then suggestions for future research based upon your evaluation of what
is lacking in the literature.