1. The document traces the evolution of writing systems from early pictograms and ideograms to modern alphabets. Early Sumerian cuneiform and Egyptian hieroglyphs represented ideas and sounds pictorially before developing into logo-syllabic systems.
2. The Phoenician alphabet evolved from Egyptian hieroglyphs and was the first true alphabet, using letters to represent individual sounds. The Greek alphabet adapted from Phoenician to create a more efficient purely alphabetic system.
3. Over thousands of years, writing systems simplified and standardized letter forms for ease and speed of writing as needs outpaced early pictographic systems. Modern letters derive from abstracted shapes of early pictographic precursors through gradual
1. The document traces the evolution of writing systems from early pictograms and ideograms to modern alphabets. Early Sumerian cuneiform and Egyptian hieroglyphs represented ideas and sounds pictorially before developing into logo-syllabic systems.
2. The Phoenician alphabet evolved from Egyptian hieroglyphs and was the first true alphabet, using letters to represent individual sounds. The Greek alphabet adapted from Phoenician to create a more efficient purely alphabetic system.
3. Over thousands of years, writing systems simplified and standardized letter forms for ease and speed of writing as needs outpaced early pictographic systems. Modern letters derive from abstracted shapes of early pictographic precursors through gradual
1. The document traces the evolution of writing systems from early pictograms and ideograms to modern alphabets. Early Sumerian cuneiform and Egyptian hieroglyphs represented ideas and sounds pictorially before developing into logo-syllabic systems.
2. The Phoenician alphabet evolved from Egyptian hieroglyphs and was the first true alphabet, using letters to represent individual sounds. The Greek alphabet adapted from Phoenician to create a more efficient purely alphabetic system.
3. Over thousands of years, writing systems simplified and standardized letter forms for ease and speed of writing as needs outpaced early pictographic systems. Modern letters derive from abstracted shapes of early pictographic precursors through gradual
1. The document traces the evolution of writing systems from early pictograms and ideograms to modern alphabets. Early Sumerian cuneiform and Egyptian hieroglyphs represented ideas and sounds pictorially before developing into logo-syllabic systems.
2. The Phoenician alphabet evolved from Egyptian hieroglyphs and was the first true alphabet, using letters to represent individual sounds. The Greek alphabet adapted from Phoenician to create a more efficient purely alphabetic system.
3. Over thousands of years, writing systems simplified and standardized letter forms for ease and speed of writing as needs outpaced early pictographic systems. Modern letters derive from abstracted shapes of early pictographic precursors through gradual
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 5
by Mariya Popova, “Literary translation”
A Historical Journey Through Writing Systems and
Evolution of Letter’s Shape It is not obvious to a modern person why the letters of the English alphabet are shaped the way they are. What were the main mind shifts that led to the invention of different writing systems? And why did some writing systems occur to be used widespread till now and another died? Before answering these questions, it is necessary to focus on the history of the first writing tries and its motivation. 1. Cuneiform as the example of logo-syllabic writing system Denise Schmandt-Besser's hypothesis [1] suggests that the ancient Sumerians and Elamites initially used a system of clay tokens of various shapes to keep track of their possessions, such as livestock and other goods with each token denoting one object (cow, ram, etc.). These tokens evolved over time, with markings and imprints appearing on them (fingerprints, serifs, recognizable geometric shapes). The tokens were placed in clay envelopes, sealed with a cylindrical seal for identification. Around 3300 B.C., imprints of the tokens along with the owner's seal began to appear on the surface of the clay containers. This duplication of information allowed for reading the contents without breaking the seal, ensuring the security of the information. Eventually, the physical tokens disappeared, leaving only their imprints, and the containers changed from spherical to flat, leading to the emergence of the first clay tablets with recorded quantities of various objects. During this period, there was no universal unit of measurement, and each symbol represented a specific qualitative and quantitative attribute. For example, the signs "1 goat", "2 sheep", "3 measures of grain" played the role of a "picture symbol", they were pictograms by definition. The early symbols of writing took the form of countable objects or goods, functioning as pictograms. Over time, combinations of these pictograms formed stable ideograms, whose meanings went beyond the sum of their individual depictions. For example, the sign "bird" together with the sign "egg" gave the combination "fecundity" not only in application to birds, but also as an abstract term. Such pictograms and ideograms are considered as precursors of writing evolving into symbols representing sounds and forming words by 3000 B.C. But in some moment it appeared to be not enough – the needs went beyond agricultural accounting and there was no possibility to represent all necessary words as pictures or logograms. So cuneiform script gradually expanded its vocabulary, adding syllabic symbols. This new logo-syllabic writing system used both – logogram symbols, representing the whole word, and between 600 and 1,000 characters to spell words by dividing them up into syllables, like 'ca-at' for cat, or 'go-at' for goat [2]. From this point Sumerian writing becomes fully capable of ciphering and deciphering information independently from knowing particular domestic phenomena. However the use of cuneiform gradually declined over time for several reasons like emergence and spread of other, more practical writing systems, evolving societal needs and the requirement for more versatile writing systems, political and cultural changes leading to the displacement of existing writing systems and technological advancements in writing tools and materials, favoring more efficient methods of communication and record-keeping. 2. Egyptian hieroglyphs as the example of logo-syllabic writing system Like cuneiform, Egyptian hieroglyphs were used for record-keeping, but also for religious purposes. However Egyptian hieroglyphs combined not only logographic and syllabic but also alphabetic elements, with about 1,000 distinct characters in total. [4] There is no knowing who invented Egyptian hieroglyphs, but hieroglyphic writing probably originated at one of the rival royal courts in the late-fourth millennium BC, before Egypt was unified under the first dynasty. While the idea of writing may have been borrowed from Mesopotamia (where it had been developed centuries earlier), the hieroglyphic system was distinctively Egyptian. Still, different versions are being argued on whether Egyptian hieroglyphs and Mesopotamian Cuneiform were invented independently.[3][5][6][7] Hieroglyphic script was the oldest in the evaluation of Egyptian writing. Each hieroglyph was a picture of a thing that existed in the world or imagination of the ancient Egyptians, for instance, the ground plan of a simple house , a human mouth , or a pair of legs in motion . These could be used to write the words that they depicted, or related words: for example, “house”; “come.” Eventually ideograms and phonograms began to appear. Ideograms were used to convey both sound and meaning (sound and meaning signs). For example depicts a house (in plan) and represents the sound combination of p + r = pr. The sign is used in the word pr = house. Phonograms were used to indicate the sounds of signs (sound signs). The sign Dw represents a sand hill and is used as a sound sign in which means evil. The sound of these signs is in Latin letters, known as transliteration. We shall start with unilateral signs which could be identified as "Alphabet".[8] As Egyptian writing progressed, different versions of the hieroglyphic script emerged, including hieratic and demotic, so called Cursive hieroglyphs used for religious literature on papyrus and wood. Hieratic, a stylized form of hieroglyphs, was used for religious, public, commercial, and private documents, while demotic, an even more condensed script, eventually replaced hieratic for most purposes, while hieratic was mostly used by priests for religious writing. 3. From logo-syllabic to alphabetic writing systems Demotic Egyptian script became the base of Proto-Sinaitic script that later evolved into the Phoenician alphabet, used as a base for old Greek – the first pure alphabetical language. In Proto-Sinaitic script for example, the hieroglyph for pr "house" (a rectangle partially open along one side) was adopted to write Semitic /b/, after the first consonant of baytu, the Semitic word for "house". The earliest known alphabetic (or "proto-alphabetic") inscriptions are the so- called Proto-Sinaitic (or Proto-Canaanite) script sporadically attested in the Sinai and in Canaan in the late Middle and Late Bronze Age. The script was not widely used until the rise of new Semitic kingdoms in the 13th and 12th centuries BC. The Phoenician alphabet is a direct continuation of the "Proto-Canaanite" script of the Bronze Age collapse period. Phoenician uses a system of acrophony to name letters. The names of the letters are essentially the same as in its parental scripts, which are in turn derived from the word values of the original hieroglyph for each letter. The original word was translated from Egyptian into its equivalent form in the Semitic language, and then the initial sound of the translated word became the letter's value.[9] 4. Writing systems evaluation and their role in history The Polish American Assyriologist Ignace Gelb distinguished four stages in this evolution, beginning with picture writing, which expressed ideas directly; followed by word-based writing systems; then by sound-based syllabic writing systems, including unvocalized syllabaries or consonantal systems; and concluding with the Greek invention of the alphabet.[10] The invention of the alphabet is a major achievement of Western culture. It is also unique. The alphabet was invented only once, though it has been borrowed by many cultures. It is a model of analytic thinking, breaking down perceptible qualities like syllables into more basic constituents. And because it is capable of conveying subtle differences in meaning, it has come to be used for the expression of a great many of the functions served by speech. The alphabet requires little of the reader beyond familiarity with its orthography. It allows the reader to decipher words newly encountered and permits the invention of spellings for new patterns of sound, including proper names (a problem that is formidable for nonalphabetic systems). Finally, its explicitness permits readers to make a relatively sharp distinction between the tasks of deciphering and interpreting. Less explicit orthographies require the reader first to grasp the meaning of a passage as a whole in order to decide which of several possible word meanings a particular graphic string represents. 5. Evolution of letter shapes As writing systems developed the shapes of letters became more and more simple. For example, here’s how the letter “A” most likely came into existence (Figure 1). All letters started as pictures and evolved over centuries before they finally acquired their current shape. Figure 1.Evoluation of letter A shape from the earliest writing systems to nowadays Analyzing the motivation that leaded people from ancient times to change their writing systems, I assume there was some overall trends of writing evolution and reasons for each of the trends: Simplification. Most, if not all, writing systems that we know have evolved towards the overall reduction of the stroke count and the drop of most complex sub- elements. Indeed, it is much simpler, faster and cheaper to write the “A” letter, than to draw a bull head. The simplification had boosted the speed of writing, entailed the spread of writing into less educated majorities, and allowed kings and librarians to save gold on salaries for professional painters to have their stuff written. Regularization. Over time, letters evolved to consist of similar, repeating elements and to be written in similar manner. For example, Latin script has such repeating elements (radicals) as half-circle (P, B, D, R), horizontal median line (H, A, F, E), circles (O, Q, C, G) and so on. It greatly contributed to ease of writing and reading: it’s easier to master the writing system when you can tell exactly how two letters are different from each other, and where some originality doesn’t hurt legibility. Also, it made writing arguably more aesthetic (you can easily tell that every Romanic letter belongs to one common set just by looking at them). Variation. More often than not, while letters evolve to consist from a limited set of radicals, they also evolve to utilize it in the most diverse way. For example, English alphabet starts like this: A, B, C, D, E, F, G… Not like this:
Figure 2.Variation of letters used in alphabets
That’s a rare occurrence in writing system evolution, because every letter starts from different pictures, but occasionally one can see a stroke popping up to enhance the difference between two letters. It’s a contribution to legibility and ease of mastery: it’s easier to pick a system when each element is different from each other as much as the system allows. Literature: 1. Before Writing: Volume 1: From Counting to Cuneiform Hardcover – May 1, 1992 2. Cuneiform /anglais Paperback – May 1, 2015by FINKEL IRVING 3. https://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/20/arts/design/20writing.html 4. Antonio Loprieno, Ancient Egyptian: A Linguistic Introduction (Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1995), p. 12. 5. Geoffrey Sampson (1990). Writing Systems: A Linguistic Introduction. Stanford University Press. pp. 78–. ISBN 978-0-8047-1756-4. Retrieved 31 October 2011. 6. Simson Najovits, Egypt, Trunk of the Tree: A Modern Survey of an Ancient Land, Algora Publishing, 2004, pp. 55–56. 7. David, Rosalie (2002). The Experience of Ancient Egypt. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-134-96799-5. Retrieved 18 April 2022. 8. https://www.worldhistory.org/Egyptian_Hieroglyphs/ 9. https://wiki.alquds.edu/?query=Phoenician_alphabet 10. https://www.britannica.com/topic/writing/History-of-writing-systems