Joy Joshua Project
Joy Joshua Project
Joy Joshua Project
BY
SUBMITTED TO
DEPARTMENT OF CURRICULUM AND INSTRUCTIONAL
TECHNOLOGY FACULTY OF EDUCATION
CROSS RIVER UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
(CRUTECH) CALABAR – NIGERIA
MAY, 2016
1
CERTIFICATION
out by Edet, Joy Joshua with the Reg. No. 11/CIT/346 and
supervised by
Signature:------------------------------
PROF. KOKO EKPO
Project Supervisor
Date:------------------------------------
2
DEDICATION
3
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
rain and the hot blazing sun, God the almighty! Without
enablement.
Koko Ekpo, who gave ready attention and took time to read
4
extended to Dr. Ntino my academic adviser for listening to
proud today.
5
ABSTRACT
6
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TITLE PAGE - - - - - - - - -
CERTIFICATION - - - - - - - - -
DEDICATION - - - - - - - - -
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT - - - - - - - -
ABSTRACT - - - - - - - - - -
TABLE OF CONTENT - - - - - - - -
LIST OF TABLE - - - - - - - - -
7
2.3 Studies Related to Achievement Motivation - -
2.4 Studies Related to Intelligence - - - - -
2.5.1 Academic Achievement - - - - -
2.5.2 Parental Encouragement - - - - - -
2.5.3 Overview - - - - - - - - -
2.5.4 Achievement Motivation - - - - - -
8
4.2.3 Hypotheses Three - - - - - - -
4.2.4 Hypotheses Four - - - - - -
4.2.5 Hypotheses Five - - - - - -
4.3 Summary of Finding - - - - - -
4.4 Discussion of Finding - - - - - -
9
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
one of the major needs of human life and through it, man
10
perception of his/her environment and his/her performance
in learning.
11
primary education is run both public (government) and
12
organization provided them at extra financial cost this
13
appropriateness of learning, supervision and co-ordination of
necessary.
14
contribute to the degree of this achievement by the level of
follow that pupils who sit closer to the teacher may stand at
15
b) To what extent does the level of availability of learning
achievement of students?
16
than those who have inadequate learning resources in
their schools.
education.
teaching ability.
17
Teacher and counselors who implement the curriculum
1.7 Assumptions
this study.
same.
18
1.8 Limitation and Delimitation of the Study
tendencies.
20
CHAPTER TWO
presented.
Government Area.
22
Ojong Peter 1983 conducted a study on reading ability
parental encouragement.
23
Deary 2004 conducted a longitudinal student to
The finding indicated that the girls performed better than the
boys.
24
and positive relationship with academic achievement of the
student.
boy and 82 girl of JSS 3 class from the school of Yala local
25
Kazmi 2011 conducted the study to evaluate the impact of
26
encouragement that proves to be catalyst in boosting and
27
with academic achievement. Studied factors related to
28
was also found to have positive influence on the academic
29
Family constellation was appeared to have greater impact on
the students.
30
2.4 Studies Related to Intelligence
31
children. The sample comprised of 160 children studying in
32
Petrides 2002 studied the role of trait intelligence in
33
independently predict the career outcome or academic
achievement.
determining.
34
parent involvement and achievement was similar for girls
student.
2.5 Overview
35
under investigation provides certain indication as under of
children.
Khare and Gerewal 1996, Muller 1998, Josi 2000, Devi and
36
2000, Catsa 1999, Focused on parental involvement and
37
Husian 2011 conducted a study on 119 B.Ed college
was also inferred from the finding that the teachers’ trainer
38
CHAPTER THREE
v. Instrumentation
39
3.1 Research Design
40
3.2 Population of the Study
primary six pupils in all the public and private primary school
41
and private schools in Yala Local Government Area. Of this
number, 140 pupils were drawn from public school and 140
in table 3.1
42
Table 3.1 Distribution of Sample by School Types and
Schools
St. Benedicts
Liberty private school
7 20 primary school 20
Ochumode
Mfuma
43
Total 140 140
44
The appropriateness of the sample so selected is assumed
development.
teacher.
45
Section II comprises nine items which required the subject
extrovert).
learning environment.
46
3.6 Procedure for Data Collection
questionnaire.
learning resources.
47
This method of administration was deemed appropriate since
seating position (front, middle and back row) while item III
48
3.8 Procedure for Testing Of Hypotheses
1. Hypotheses One
back row).
Dependent variable:
Academic performance
Statistical method
used.
2. Hypotheses Two
Inadequate).
49
Dependent variable
Academic performance
Statistical Analysis
3. Hypotheses Three
education.
school attended.
analysis
4. Hypotheses four
50
Independent variables: Level of satisfaction with teacher
Statistical Analysis.
5. Hypotheses five
statistical Analysis.
51
CHAPTER FOUR
DISCUSSION OF FINDINGS
education.
52
formulated for this study were tested at 0.05 level of
significant.
Interpretation of Results
53
among the group was insignificantly as a consequences of
Table 1:
One Way Analysis Of Variance on Influence of Seating
Position on Students Academic Performance
Group N X SD
Front row
82 72.90 12.03
54
4.2.2 Hypotheses Two
55
Table 2
Independent T-Test Analysis of the Influence of
Adequate of Learning Resources on Pupil’s Academic
Performances
Variable N X SD T
56
to the rejection of null hypotheses, which stated that there
57
students exist attributed to the kindergarten is as presented
in table 3
into those who are satisfied and those who are unsatisfied
58
level of satisfaction with teacher teaching abilities on student
academic performance.
introvert teacher.
59
questionnaire the average score of each student
table 5
Personality
N X SD t-value
type
Extrovert 149 62.95 15.78 3.32
60
were taught by introvert teacher who had a mean (x) score
61
4.3 Summary of Finding
62
resource on student academic performance the
p>.05).
63
4.4 Discussion of Finding
64
learning resource performed academically better than those
process.
65
Thus, significantly influences adequacy of learning
66
not exposed to kindergarten education with poor or no poor
study.
academic performance.
67
However, it supports other work like Nnolim (1986)
The reason for the finding may be that the way the
68
from the learning since he no longer perceived the classroom
69
The reason for the finding could be that those who see
position.
70
This situation tends to affect both their rate of assimilation of
71
CHAPTER FIVE
the study.
72
1. Seating of the position of student does not significantly
academic performance.
73
student were selected from seven randomly selected in
respectively.
74
iii. Student who have adequate learning resources perform
teaching abilities.
5.2 Conclusions
75
i. Seating position significantly influence students
academic performance.
performance.
teachers.
76
5.3 Recommendations
learning.
77
existing learning facilities. This is with the knowledge of
78
dissatisfaction student have about their output and
salaries are not paid or when paid are not as at when due
structure.
79
REFERENCES
80