Fimmu 11 02161

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 15

REVIEW

published: 15 October 2020


doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.02161

Etiopathogenesis, Challenges and


Remedies Associated With Female
Genital Tuberculosis: Potential Role
of Nuclear Receptors
Shalini Gupta and Pawan Gupta *

Department of Molecular Biology, CSIR-Institute of Microbial Technology, Chandigarh, India

Extra-pulmonary tuberculosis (EPTB) is recognized mainly as a secondary manifestation of a


primary tuberculosis (TB) infection in the lungs contributing to a high incidence of morbidity
and mortality. The TB bacilli upon reactivation maneuver from the primary site disseminating
to other organs. Diagnosis and treatment of EPTB remains challenging due to the abstruse
Edited by: positioning of the infected organs and the associated invasiveness of sample acquisition as
Marco Rinaldo Oggioni,
well as misdiagnosis, associated comorbidities, and the inadequacy of biomarkers. Female
University of Leicester,
United Kingdom genital tuberculosis (FGTB) represents the most perilous form of EPTB leading to poor
Reviewed by: uterine receptivity (UR), recurrent implantation failure and infertility in females. Although the
Sunil Joshi, number of TB cases is reducing, FGTB cases are not getting enough attention because of a
University of Miami, United States
Jiezuan Yang,
lack of clinical awareness, nonspecific symptoms, and inappropriate diagnostic measures.
Zhejiang University, China This review provides an overview for EPTB, particularly FGTB diagnostics and treatment
Marielle C. Haks,
challenges. We emphasize the need for new therapeutics and highlight the need for the
Leiden University Medical Center,
Netherlands exaction of biomarkers as a point of care diagnostic. Nuclear receptors have reported role in
Yean Kong Yong, maintaining UR, immune modulation, and TB modulation; therefore, we postulate their role
Xiamen University, Malaysia
as a therapeutic drug target and biomarker that should be explored in FGTB.
*Correspondence:
Pawan Gupta Keywords: nuclear receptors, uterine receptivity, cytokine modulation, female genital tuberculosis, recurrent
[email protected] implantation failure, endometrium regeneration, extrapulmonary tuberculosis

Specialty section:
This article was submitted to
Microbial Immunology, INTRODUCTION
a section of the journal
Frontiers in Immunology Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M. tuberculosis) is an etiological agent that causes tuberculosis (TB),
Received: 29 January 2020
which is a health issue of global importance. TB profoundly exists in two forms, i.e., pulmonary
Accepted: 07 August 2020 and extrapulmonary. The most prevalent site of TB infection is the lungs; this is called pulmonary
Published: 15 October 2020 TB (PTB), where the bacilli are phagocytosed in alveolar macrophages and are contagious via
Citation:
Gupta S and Gupta P (2020) Abbreviations: EPTB, Extrapulmonary Tuberculosis; PTB, Pulmonary Tuberculosis; TB, Tuberculosis; FGTB, Female Genital
Etiopathogenesis, Challenges and Tuberculosis; RIF, Recurrent Implantation Failure; UR, Uterine Receptivity; ER, Endometrium regeneration; CM, Cytokine
Remedies Associated With Female modulation; LIF, Leukemia inhibitory factor; VEGF, Vascular endothelial growth factor; NR, Nuclear Receptors; TR4,
Genital Tuberculosis: Potential Role of Testicular receptor; PPAR, Peroxisome Proliferator Activated Receptor; PXR, Pregnane X Receptor; VDR, Vitamin D
Nuclear Receptors. Receptor; LXR, Liver X Receptor; PR, Progesterone receptor; LRH1, Liver receptor homolog 1; Nurr, Nuclear receptor related;
Front. Immunol. 11:02161. AR, Androgen receptor; COUP-TF, Chicken Ovalbumin Upstream Promoter; SF-1, Steroidogenic Factor; FXR, Farnesoid X
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.02161 Receptor; IL, Interleukin.

Frontiers in Immunology | www.frontiersin.org 1 October 2020 | Volume 11 | Article 02161


Gupta and Gupta Role of Nuclear Receptors in FGTB

aerosol dissemination. TB bacilli can also disseminate to other This review highlights the major challenges of EPTB, especially
organs and causes extrapulmonary tuberculosis (EPTB). The FGTB, and necessitates the need for research efforts for effective
genital organs are also an important site for dissemination. biomarker discovery in FGTB. The objective of this review is to
Table 1 shows the distribution of TB cases at extrapulmonary introduce the diagnostic, treatment, and comorbidity challenges
sites (1). EPTB is mainly considered to be a secondary associated with EPTB and, in particular, FGTB and to raise
manifestation of the primary infection, which is rarely fundamental biological questions regarding the impact of FGTB
contagious; however, extrapulmonary involvement can occur on female fertility and on the major issues of endometrium
with or without PTB. The World Health Organization (WHO) regeneration (ER), uterine receptivity (UR), and cytokine
reported 7 million TB cases in 2018 of which 15% were EPTB modulation (CM). This review covers the current knowledge
(2). Additionally, approximately, 10%–50% of EPTB cases are of nuclear receptors (NRs), reported in regeneration, female
reported to also have pulmonary manifestation (3). The reproduction, and in the maintenance of pregnancy with
prevalence of EPTB significantly contributes to TB-related the aim of conceptually postulating that NRs should be
morbidity and mortality and is a leading cause of maternal explored in the diagnosis and combating of FGTB-associated
mortality. In a case study, the highest mortality rates are female infertility.
reported for meningitis TB (9.6%) and peritoneal TB (8.5%)
(4). Peritoneal TB and female genital TB (FGTB) are a threat to
human species propagation (5). Bacterial dissemination leading
to EPTB occurs majorly via three different channels, i.e., EPIDEMIOLOGY AND CLINICAL
hematogenous, lymphatic, and direct spread (6). Additionally, PRESENTATION OF FGTB: THE
producing new blood vessels through vascular endothelial SILENT RISE
growth factor (VEGF) can assist in bacterial dissemination (7).
Some rare modes of transmission include congenital FGTB is the most enigmatic form of EPTB, representing 15%–20%
transmission, accidental inoculation, therapeutic instillation, of EPTB cases (12, 13), and is responsible for poor UR, poor
and vaccination (8). The atypical presentation, paucibacillary endometrial adhesions, and recurrent implantation failure (RIF) in
nature, arduousness in procuring appropriate clinical sample, females (14). However, the exact proportion of FGTB is not
lack of awareness among clinicians, and poor sensitivity of known due to underreporting of cases, nonspecific symptoms,
conventional microbiological techniques in EPTB, particularly misleading clinical appearance, and lack of diagnostic measures.
FGTB, are challenges in diagnosis that further raise the cost due Additionally, in a case study, approximately 75.6% of patients’
to disability. EPTB cases are on the rise; however, there is still a cases evaluated for infertility were diagnosed with FGTB (15). It is
very extensive awareness gap compared to PTB (15% vs. 86%) highly concerning because the manifestations are asymptomatic,
(9). The aim of the WHO’s “end TB strategy” highlights the and by the time FGTB is diagnosed, it has already left an impact on
need for patient TB care and awareness programs in PTB (10). female fertility and morbidity. There is also a social stigma
However, the information on EPTB needs to be adequately attached to FGTB that causes it to be difficult for women to talk
addressed. FGTB, which represents the most perilous form of openly about it. FGTB is known to mainly cause primary infertility
EPTB, is steadily rising as one of the major causes of infertility in rather than secondary infertility (16); therefore, even after
females. Globally, about 5%–10% of infertile women are successful treatment, conception rates are very low (19.2%), the
reported to have FGTB (11). FGTB demands immediate success of pregnancy is very low (16.6%), and the birth rate is also
attention because of its low recovery rates and the increased extremely low (7.2%) (17, 18). The TB bacilli break out from the
abortion rates observed during recent years. Primary infection primary site of infection and reach the genital area generally
of TB in the genital tract of females, albeit rare, may occur if the through hematogenous spread (19). The most prevalent site of
partner has active genitourinary TB. Despite our current bacterial infection for FGTB includes the endometrium (50%–
understanding, it is vital that research into EPTB and 60%), fallopian tubes (95%–100%), ovaries (20%–30%), cervix
especially FGTB is increased as it is critical to enhance our (5%–15%), myometrium (2.5%), and vagina/vulva (1%) (19, 20).
knowledge of this disease in order to effectively combat it. FGTB causes caseation, adhesions, ulcerations, and complete
distortion of the cavity causing Asherman syndrome. The
clinical appearance of FGTB is generally called “the considerable
TABLE 1 | The bacterial manifestation reported at the surplus site and the
pretender” because it mimics ovarian carcinoma (21). FGTB
prepotency. represent various clinical symptoms of infertility (43%–74%),
oligomenorrhea (54%), amenorrhea (14%), dysmenorrhea (12%–
Extrapulmonary forms Occupied site of EPTB (%) Mode of spread 30%), abdominal pain (42.5%), menorrhagia (19%), dyspareunia
Lymph node TB 35% Direct (5%–12%), and postmenopausal bleeding (2%) (19, 22–25). The
Pleural TB 20% Hematogenous abovementioned clinical presentations arise because the ER
Meningitis TB 5% Hematogenous capability is compromised, which contributes to recurrent
Abdomen TB 3% Direct pregnancy loss and infertility (Table 2). All these symptoms
Miliary TB 8% Hematogenous
Bone and joint TB 10% Hematogenous
pertain to the endometrium, and its regeneration needs to be
Genitourinary TB 9% Hematogenous addressed and investigated. The key factors that modulate and
Others 10% exacerbate FGTB need to be identified.

Frontiers in Immunology | www.frontiersin.org 2 October 2020 | Volume 11 | Article 02161


Gupta and Gupta Role of Nuclear Receptors in FGTB

TABLE 2 | Various forms of clinical presentations of FGTB are shown along with the patient is diagnosed with mental disturbance or is found to
signs and symptoms.
have lymphocytic pleocytosis (42). Due to the nonparticular
Extrapulmonary Clinical Signs and Symptoms symptoms, miliary TB and urogenital TB are often diagnosed at
infection presentation an autopsy (8, 43–46).
Being a paucibacillary disease, the diagnostic measures of FGTB
TB of endometrium Uterine leiomyoma Pyometra
Postmenopausal Irregular vaginal bleeding and
involve a combination of bacteriological confirmatory measures.
TB persistent leucorrhoea FGTB patients exhibit features of dysfunction of genital organs
Oligomenorrhoea Menstrual disturbance rather than any symptoms of infection. Repeatedly invasive
Amenorrhoea Menstrual disturbance techniques are utilized to acquire sufficient samples of body
Menorrhagia Abnormal vaginal discharge
fluids, tissues, or biopsies. FGTB diagnosis is mainly done
TB of cervix Ovarian carcinoma Postcoital bleeding
TB of vulva Tumor Bloodstained discharge through endometrial samples using microscopy (AFB),
TB of ovary Perioophoritis Tubo-ovarian masses histopathological detection of epithelioid granuloma on biopsy,
TB of fallopian tube Salpingitis and Ectopic pregnancy and Gene-Xpert (41). Peritoneal fluid or biopsy for culture,
tubal block endoscopy, and cervical cytology are also performed for
Infertility Implantation failure
diagnosis. However, histopathological findings are not specific
TB of pelvic Fistula formation Rupture of a tuberculous pyosalpinx
Malaise Pelvic inflammatory disease for FGTB because of shedding of the endometrium. Magnetic
resonance imaging and positron emission tomography have been
used for detecting tubo-ovarian masses (47, 48). Loop-mediated
THE DIAGNOSTIC CHALLENGES OF EPTB isothermal amplification is the most convenient technique used for
WITH AN EMPHASIS ON FGTB diagnosing FGTB (49). A laparoscopy combined with
hysteroscopy is the most reliable tool to diagnose FGTB;
The diagnostic tools for EPTB include the nucleic acid however, this is associated with perioperative complications.
amplification test (Gene-Xpert), immunological test, biopsy, Laparoscopy is risky because of the presence of many adhesions,
body fluid examination, and sputum acid-fast bacillus (AFB) which cover the pelvic organs and may hinder the diagnosis and
smear. Gene-Xpert shows high sensitivity in EPTB samples but is can increase the risk of bleeding (41, 50). Hysteroscopy is
less in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), i.e., 29% (26). The antibody- associated with various complications, such as excessive
based serological test has poor sensitivity and is not applicable to bleeding, perforation, inability to distinguish and distend cavity,
EPTB samples (27). Blood transcriptomic biomarkers are and flare-up of genital TB, which can cause abortions and
identified in TB, which can easily discriminate between healthy infertility (51). FGTB, specifically endometrial TB, represents
and infected persons (28–31). The onset of TB can be predicted ulceration, caseous necrosis, and hemorrhage; this necessitates
through metabolite changes in blood (32). Blood transcriptomic careful macroscopic sampling (51, 52). FGTB is a silent disease;
and metabolic signatures have improved diagnosis in TB and are rarely, it presents as abdominal pain, abnormal genital bleeding,
being explored as probable diagnosis for EPTB (8, 33, 34). and dyspareunia (53). The misdiagnosis rate is very high among
Systematic reviews on TB biomarkers, including antibodies, FGTB patients and is associated with several complications. The
cytokines, chemokines, proteins, and metabolic activity disease is mistaken for other gynecological conditions or
markers have already been published (35). These biomarkers, malignancy; for example, FGTB is misdiagnosed as ovarian
to some extent, have also been studied in EPTB (36, 37). EPTB is cancer or chocolate cyst or pelvic inflammatory disease (PID)
largely undiagnosed in patients, especially when visceral sites are (54), and FGTB patients who are reported to have cervical TB may
involved. The detection of EPTB, particularly FGTB, poses a masquerade as cervical cancer (41, 55). Additionally, FGTB
major challenge with conventional methods. EPTB diagnosis is patients may be mistaken or coexist with acute appendicitis or
challenging because of misdiagnosis, arduousness in acquiring of ectopic pregnancy (52). TB of the vulva and cervix is very arduous
clinical samples, being asymptomatic, and poor sensitivity of to distinguish as it appears as brucellosis, schistosomiasis,
existing diagnostic (Figure 1). Generally, miliary TB is tularemia, cervical amoebiasis, sarcoidosis, syphilis, or chancroid
misdiagnosed with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) (38). (56). Furthermore, a high level of drug resistance is witnessed in
EPTB, particularly peritoneal TB, may also be misinterpreted as FGTB (57). Given the above challenges with FGTB diagnosis,
ovarian cancer and peritoneal carcinomatosis (5, 39). Intestinal including exceptional positioning of organs, associated
TB is misdiagnosed with Crohn disease (40). Bone and joint TB invasiveness of sample collections, misdiagnosis, being
are misdiagnosed as rheumatoid arthritis, traumatism, and gout. asymptomatic, poor sensitivity, the emergence of drug resistance,
Vulva and vaginal TB is misdiagnosed with malignancy (41). and the lack of point of care, there is a strong need to identify
Invasiveness and constraints in obtaining biopsies prevent the FGTB-specific biomarkers. The biosignatures emanating from the
early diagnosis of EPTB, and in addition, these diagnostic tests pathogen have been reported for FGTB diagnosis (58). However,
can cause incidental damages and infection; for instance, in the the sensitivity of detection in FGTB patient samples is very low
case of meningitis TB, extraction of CSF can possibly harm the because the infected sites are missed due to the paucibacillary
nerves around the site of insertion. Biopsy, endoscopy, nature of M. tuberculosis. We are focusing on the host-derived
cystoscopy, and lumbar puncture are all performed depending biomarkers for the prompt and accurate diagnosis of FGTB from
on the case for other EPTBs (8). Meningitis TB is suspected when easily accessible samples without utilizing any invasive procedure.

Frontiers in Immunology | www.frontiersin.org 3 October 2020 | Volume 11 | Article 02161


Frontiers in Immunology | www.frontiersin.org

Gupta and Gupta


4

FIGURE 1 | Diagnostic challenges and remedies for EPTB, in particular FGTB. Various challenges associated with EPTB diagnosis, such as misdiagnosis, often asymptomatic and paucibacillary nature of bacilli,
lack of sensitivity of existing conventional methods, and lack of point-of-care diagnostics, lead to loss due to disability.
October 2020 | Volume 11 | Article 02161

Role of Nuclear Receptors in FGTB


Gupta and Gupta Role of Nuclear Receptors in FGTB

TREATMENT CHALLENGES OF EPTB regenerative therapy to treat damaged endometrium, fallopian


WITH AN EMPHASIS ON FGTB tubes, and ovaries (41). Vitamin D plays a crucial role in the
treatment of FGTB (75). The use of steroids and immunotherapy
Treatment of EPTB faces major challenges from comorbidities is observed to a large extent among infertile patients and leads to
(e.g., HIV coinfection or renal failure), drug sovereignty, resurgence of M. tuberculosis (76). Surgery in FGTB is performed
misdiagnosis, drug disposition, and unusual positioning of a as an adjunctive therapy during persistent or recurrent infection,
few organs, i.e., endometrium, central nervous system (CNS) the presence of nonhealing fistulae, and for multi-drug-resistant
(Figure 2). Chronic renal failure exacerbates EPTB more than TB; however, reactivation of bacilli has been observed during
TB (59). During renal impairment, DOTS therapy is eliminated surgery and has been detected after hysterosalpingography,
by nonrenal routes; for example, by biliary secretion or through laparoscopy, hysteroscopy, and laparotomy (77). Obstetric
metabolism. Coadministration of anti-HIV and anti-TB drugs in complications, such as preterm labor, increased rate of
a comorbid condition leads to absorption issues due to a abortions, and neonatal mortality is high in FGTB. Perioperative
reduction in the assimilation of the two key anti-TB drugs complications, such as extreme hemorrhage with huge risk of
(rifampin and isoniazid) (60). Likewise, TB drugs also lower damage to the pelvic and abdominal organs and the bowel, have
the levels of antiretroviral drugs; as soon as the antiretroviral been discerned during laparotomy (41). FGTB with pervasive
therapy is initiated, it paradoxically results in worsening of adhesions in the uterus and blocked tubes and pelvis is not
symptoms or causes immune reconstitution inflammatory treatable even after successful treatment (41). Hysteroscopy is
syndrome (1, 61). A high proportion of drug-induced liver used to diagnose the adhesions and Asherman syndrome (78);
injuries are observed in cirrhosis patients coinfected with TB however, it is associated with several complications in FGTB, such
(62). Ascites formed in the body in peritonitis TB present a as, inability to visualize the cavity, excessive bleeding, perforation,
problem for anti-TB drug disposition (63). Approximately 10%– bowel injury, peritonitis, and flare-up of genital TB (51, 79).
20% of patients consuming ATT (anti-TB drugs; Ethambutol, Postoperative complications, such as bowel fistula and mortality
Pyrazinamide, Isoniazid, and Rifampicin) either in a single or rate are high in FGTB. Repeated invasive measures are required
combinatorial therapy are at a risk of evolving hepatotoxicity after ATT treatment for proper prognosis for fertility. The
(64–66). When EPTB is misdiagnosed as another disease, the conception rate after ATT is only 12.8%, and the outcome of
treatment for the erroneous disease may exacerbate EPTB; for pregnancy could still be a live birth, spontaneous abortion, or
example, immunosuppressant therapy given when EPTB is ectopic pregnancy (80, 81). Furthermore, if patients are considered
misdiagnosed as chronic kidney disease exacerbates the actual cured, their chances of pregnancy drop due to the irreversible
case of EPTB (67, 68). A case was reported in which damage of the fallopian tube and endometrium. Moreover, FGTB,
immunosuppressant therapy given for SLE in a patient if not properly treated, can cause permanent sterility through
coinfected with disseminated TB led to respiratory failure (69). endometrial destruction and tubal damage (41). In vitro
Meningitis TB treatment is challenging because of the poor fertilization (IVF) is considered to be the successful modality for
penetration of drugs (e.g., rifampin and streptomycin) into the pregnancy in FGTB patients; however, a pregnancy rate of only
CSF due to the impervious blood–brain barrier (70). EPTB is 17.3% is observed even after successful treatment (82, 83).
curable with ATT drugs only to an extent and may result in The emergence of drug resistance among EPTB, particularly
several complications; for example, patients on ATT treatment FGTB patients, is on the rise, and it poses a further threat to TB
may develop acute kidney injuries and increase the risk for control. EPTB patients have a higher proportion of drug resistance
nephrotoxicity neuropathy and CNS toxicity (71–73). EPTB compared to PTB patients (84). Furthermore, a high proportion of
treatment also has some exclusion criterion; i.e., chemotherapy drug resistance is witnessed among the treatment failure cases of
is detrimental during the first trimester of pregnancy as it EPTB (52.7%) and PTB (48.1%) (85). The emergence of a multi-
prompts pregnancy termination. Specific adjuvant therapy, drug-resistant strain has been reported in FGTB (57). Engineered
chemotherapy, and major surgery are suggested in some bacteriophages (Muddy, BPs33DHTH-HRM10, and ZoeJD45) are
uncommon types of EPTB to avoid the complications of TB used as an adjunctive therapy against drug-resistant disseminated
dissemination (Figure 2). Chemotherapy is required for Mycobacterium abscessus (86). Antitubercular peptides, such as
genitourinary TB with surgery being substantial and reconstructive cathelicidins, defensins, granulysin, and hepcidin, are developed as
surgery required to repair the ureteral strictures (3). novel TB therapeutics against drug-resistant TB (87).
The treatment of FGTB faces formidable challenges from
coinfection (HIV, etc.); drug toxicity; obstetric, perioperative,
and postoperative complications; reactivation; and emergence of
drug-resistant bacteria (Figure 2). FGTB and HIV coinfection GENITAL TUBERCULOSIS: ADEPTNESS
make the most deadly combination and is the leading cause of IN IMMUNE MODULATION
maternal mortality. Moreover, reactivation of bacilli has been
observed in FGTB and HIV coinfection (12). HIV-induced Various molecules that are essential for implantation are being
immunosuppression in FGTB patients may also cause PID (74). identified as potential players of uterine receptivity, such as growth
ATT drugs can cause several complications in FGTB (41). Stem factors, i.e., VEGF; cytokines, i.e., leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF)
cells, nanotechnology, and colostrum are being used as a (88, 89); and cell adhesion molecules, i.e., CDH1 (E cadherin),

Frontiers in Immunology | www.frontiersin.org 5 October 2020 | Volume 11 | Article 02161


Frontiers in Immunology | www.frontiersin.org

Gupta and Gupta


6

FIGURE 2 | Treatment challenges and remedies for EPTB, in particular, FGTB. Various comorbidity challenges associated with EPTB are depicted. The risk of EPTB, particularly FGTB, occurrence increases in a
comorbid condition depending on the severity of immunosuppression associated with these diseases. Coadministration of drugs results in drug sovereignty, toxicity, absorption issues, and paradoxical reactions in
the body, which can further exacerbate the condition. EPTB misdiagnosis and subsequent mistreatment suppress the immune system to such an extent that it increases the bacterial prepotency of spreading to
other organs (example genital organs) and exacerbation. Differential diagnosis in FGTB leads to erroneous surgical procedures, which can cause complications. ATT treatment in EPTB, in particular FGTB, faces drug
October 2020 | Volume 11 | Article 02161

disposition and accretion challenges. The unusual positioning of infected organs in EPTB illustrate treatment challenges, especially in meningitis TB, ovarian TB, urogenital TB, and endometrial TB. Due to the
inaccessibility of organs in FGTB, surgical interventions are required to avoid dissemination of M. tuberculosis; however, several perioperative complications have been observed during surgery. Erroneous surgical

Role of Nuclear Receptors in FGTB


procedures and mistreatment lead to obstetric and postoperative complications. Stem cell therapy, chemotherapy, vitamin D therapy, and surgical interventions can be beneficial in FGTB, whereas adjuvant therapy
is known to be effective in EPTB, and engineered bacteriophages and antitubercular peptides are used for drug-resistant TB.
Gupta and Gupta Role of Nuclear Receptors in FGTB

ITGAVB3 (avb3), MUC-1 (Mucin-1), and MECA79, as well as contribute to the pathogenesis of EPTB; therefore, anti-VEGF
hormones expressed during implantation (90, 91) (Figure 3). FGTB agents are used in TB to prevent bacterial dissemination (96, 97).
infection is found to alter the endometrial milieu and, thus, the UR, TB bacilli show an antigonadotropic effect in FGTB, impeding the
by causing immune modulation, endocrine disruption, activation of production of progesterone and human chorionic gonadotropin
antiphospholipids antibodies, and microthrombosis, which leads to (98). In FGTB, luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle stimulating
RIF, a major cause of infertility (92). FGTB significantly alters the hormone (FSH) levels are high, and inhibin levels are very low (99).
level of ITGAVB3, MECA79, CDH1, MUC-1, and VEGF, leading Inhibin is considered to be a more sensitive marker of ovarian
to RIF (90). ITGAVB3 is essential for implantation, and its reserve in FGTB compared to FSH (99, 100). Latent FGTB not only
expression is reduced in both FGTB and unexplained recurrent interferes with implantation in the basal endometrial layer, but also
pregnancy loss (90, 91). Additionally, an aberrant (reduced) lowers the level of two ovarian markers, i.e., antimullerian hormone
expression of LIF has been reported in the endometrium in and antral follicle count (101). Furthermore, it has been observed
FGTB. The concentration of LIF is higher in fertile women that FGTB lowers the oocyte yield and the ovarian reserve (101).
compared to infertile females (93). LIF can activate signal Cytokine production differs in PTB and EPTB patients; females
transducers and activators of transcription 3 (STAT3) through a with normal pregnancy have been observed to have Th2-type
signaling cascade mechanism, which regulates UR and is further cytokine milieu, whereas there has been shown to be an increased
required for the transcription of VEGF, an angiogenic factor whose production of Th1-type cytokines in unexplained recurrent
role during pregnancy is well studied (88, 90, 94, 95). FGTB lowers abortions (102, 103). The inflammatory environment in the
VEGF expression; thus creating an unfavorable environment for endometrium prompts the preponderance of adverse cytokines
embryonic implantation (90). On the contrary, high VEGF levels and antibodies of the Th1 repertoire, making it nonreceptive to

FIGURE 3 | FGTB: Immune dysregulation compromises female fertility. The impact of FGTB on female fertility is depicted. FGTB adversely affects uterine receptivity
through immune dysregulation. Various cell adhesion molecules, growth factors, glycoproteins, and cytokines mentioned here are potential biomarkers of uterine
receptivity and for successful placentation. FGTB lowers the level of CDH1, MUC1, MECA79, and ITGAVB3, leading to recurrent implantation failure. Similarly, FGTB
pares down the levels of VEGF and LIF, which are required for successful placentation, thus creating an unfavorable environment for embryonic implantation.
Glycoproteins and cytokines are also required for embryonic development. FGTB also affects embryonic development through upregulating proinflammatory cytokine
expression and antiphospholipid antibodies as well as by lowering anti-inflammatory cytokine expression and ovarian reserve markers, such as the antimullerian hormone.

Frontiers in Immunology | www.frontiersin.org 7 October 2020 | Volume 11 | Article 02161


Gupta and Gupta Role of Nuclear Receptors in FGTB

the embryo, thereby causing an implantation failure (92). However, (Figure 4). NRs are ligand-activated transcriptional factors that act
T regulatory cells, a subset of CD4+ T cells limit the adaptive as molecular switches and can govern many physiological processes,
immune response and contribute to the persistence of chronic such as metabolism, reproduction, and development. The
infection. Immune dysregulation has been reported in patients who superfamily of NRs shares a common structure containing an
have a past or present history of EPTB as observed by an increased amino terminal domain, a conserved DNA-binding domain
production of T regulatory cells, high levels of IL-17, and (DBD), a hinge region, and a ligand-binding domain (LBD) at
CD4+ lymphocyte activation (104, 105). the carboxy terminal. The amino terminal domain includes the
activator function-1 region (AF-1), which interacts with several
coregulatory proteins and is also a site for various posttranslational
NRS AND FGTB: POTENTIAL MARKERS modification. The DBD is conserved and has two subdomains (for
AND DRUG TARGETS DNA binding and receptor dimerization), each containing 4
cysteine residues that coordinate with a zinc ion to form zinc
This review aims to accentuate three major points: (i) the diagnostic finger motif. The hinge region consists of a nuclear localization
and treatment challenges of EPTB, particularly FGTB; (ii) the need signal, and the LBD harbors another activation function domain
for new therapeutics and diagnostics of EPTB, particularly FGTB; (AF-2) that can interact directly with coregulator proteins (106).
and (iii) the demand for FGTB biomarkers as a point-of-care NRs can exist as monomer, homodimer, and heterodimer that
diagnostic. NRs appear to be major potential therapeutic targets recognize a specific DNA sequence on the target genes known as
owing to their roles being reported as both pro-TB and anti-TB response elements. NRs are classified into three categories based on

FIGURE 4 | NRs are potential therapeutic targets and markers. NRs have many roles in TB, which makes them potential therapeutic targets for combating FGTB.
NRs have been reported in female fertility; for example PR, VDR, COUP-TF, PPARs, SF-1, and LXR are essential for maintaining uterine receptivity through
successful placentation and embryonic development. NRs such as COUP-TF, VDR, ERb, and PPARs play an important role in differentiation of ovarian cells and
angiogenesis. NRs such as PR, ERb, PPARs, LRH1, and AR are reported in endometrium maintenance. NRs are also good immuno-modulators that may act either
directly to combat the compromised tissue’s regenerative capacity or indirectly via CM to repair damaged tissues. NRs such as AR, Rev-erb, TRa, FXR, and CAR
are reported for tissue regeneration, whereas PPARs, Rev-erba, Nurr77, Nurr1, PXR, FXR, RORa, and LXR are known to modulate different cytokines’ milieu.
Additionally, NRs enhance the self-renewing and differentiation capacity of transcription factors through direct modulation. NRs should be considered as TB
biomarkers owing to their reported roles in both therapeutics and pathogenesis. NRs such as TR4, PPARg, and PXR are considered as host cohorts in
M. tuberculosis survival. Conversely, NRs such as VDR, LXR, and Rev-erba are considered as good host combatants for M. tuberculosis clearance.

Frontiers in Immunology | www.frontiersin.org 8 October 2020 | Volume 11 | Article 02161


Gupta and Gupta Role of Nuclear Receptors in FGTB

the ligand variability: class I constitutes the endocrine receptors, (LRH1), retinoic acid receptor (RAR), chicken ovalbumin
class II includes orphan receptors, and class III comprises adopted upstream promoter (COUP-TFII), steroidogenic factor (SF-1),
orphan receptors. The endocrine receptors recognize steroid androgen receptor (AR), LXR, VDR, progesterone receptor (PR),
molecules and vitamins as their ligands and possess a high estrogen receptor (ERb), and PPARs have been reported for
affinity toward them. The orphan receptors are those for which successful uterine implantation and endometrium maintenance.
no endogenous ligand has been deciphered, and the adopted VDR has also been reported to be important for the
orphans are those whose ligands have been recently identified, differentiation of granulosa cells. The NR LRH1 is reported to
and they bind to low-affinity dietary lipids. As various biological be important for mouse fertility (118), ovulation, and ovarian
processes are regulated by NRs, pharmacological inhibition or steroidogenesis (119, 120). RAR is involved in early embryonic
dysregulation of them can lead to various diseases, including development (121). COUP-TFII is required for placental
cancer, metabolic disorders, infertility, and neurodegeneration. development and angiogenesis (122, 123). SF-1 is reported for
They also play a significant role in infectious disease biology as folliculogenesis and in the process of ovulation with its absence
many pathogens, for their own advantage, can modulate NRs either in granulosa cells leading to impaired ovulation (124, 125). AR
by interfering with their transcriptional activity or by changing their signaling is essential for endometrial function, whereas its
function. NRs have been studied in macrophage response to perturbation leads to reproductive failure (126). LXR
infectious disease, which also shows the potential role of NRs in modulates ovarian endocrine and exocrine function and uterus
combating infectious disease (107). Our earlier studies show a contractility (127). VDR expression increases during pregnancy
heterologous and noncanonical ligand receptor pairing, which and helps with reproductive function (128). Vitamin D has roles
clearly demonstrates that M. tuberculosis engage NRs (108–110). in folliculogenesis, differentiation, luteinization, and
NRs, such as testicular receptor (TR4), peroxisome proliferator steroidogenesis as well as altering antimullerian hormone
activated receptor (PPARg), and pregnane X receptor (PXR), signaling and progesterone production (129). Vitamin D
enhance M. tuberculosis survival by subverting the host innate deficiency in pregnancy increases the fortuity of preterm birth
immune defense mechanism and may increase the risk of and preeclampsia (130, 131). PR signaling is essential for the
dissemination (108, 109, 111). Our group has shown that M. initiation and maintenance of pregnancy (132). ERb is essential
tuberculosis cell wall lipids can crosstalk with NRs, such as for maintaining the endometrium quiescence and vasculature
PPARg, TR4, and PXR. These NRs are involved in the formation (133). PPARs are essential for trophoblast invasion,
of lipid-enriched foamy macrophages inside the host cell, which decidualization, tissue remodeling, ovarian function, and
further enhances M. tuberculosis survival and subverts the immune placental formation (134–136). Additionally, circadian rhythm
response by abrogating the phagolysosomal fusion, inhibiting the disturbance is reported to affect female fertility (137). Rev-erb is a
secretion of proinflammatory cytokines and abating apoptosis. circadian NR, which maintains the circadian rhythm (138) and
Furthermore, our group also reports that PXR causes TB drug may have a role in female fertility. Because NRs play crucial roles
nonresponsiveness in human macrophages by virtue of modulating in female reproduction, they could make good therapeutic
drug efflux transporters (111). It has been observed that knockout of targets to combat female infertility.
PPARg in a mouse model reduces the growth of M. tuberculosis, RIF occurs due to compromised ER capacity; therefore, stem
lowers granulomatous infiltration, and enhances secretion of the cell therapy for ER could be helpful. Many NRs have gained
proinflammatory cytokines (112). Moreover, NRs, such as vitamin
D receptor (VDR) (113), Rev-erba (114), and liver X receptor
(LXR) (115), help with M. tuberculosis clearance. Interestingly, TABLE 3 | Role of Nuclear receptors in female reproduction.
EPTB patients with multidrug-resistant TB have lower vitamin D
Nuclear Functions in Female Reproduction
levels (116). TR4 is identified as a marker for early TB detection in
Receptors
rhesus macaques, demonstrating that NRs are likely to make good
biomarkers for TB (117). The expression level of TR4 is linked with LRH1 Essential for ovarian steroidogenesis and ovulation
severity of disease progression in the PBMCs of M. tuberculosis– PR Implantation, decidualization, and preventing endometriosis
ERa Endometriosis progression
infected rhesus macaques. Correspondingly, NRs can be modulated
ERb Maintenance of endometrium quiescence and vasculature
by small molecules, which allows them to be a potential therapeutic SF-1 Development of reproductive tissue, ovulation, and
drug target. NRs also may have a role in EPTB, particularly FGTB folliculogenesis
which needs to be addressed further. VDR Differentiation of granulosa cells, folliculogenesis, luteinization,
The three chief challenges pertaining to FGTB are UR, ER, and steroidogenesis
PPARa Proliferation and differentiation of ovarian cells
and CM. These three factors are required for maintaining female PPARb Implantation and decidualization
fertility; their dysregulation, either directly or indirectly, leads to PPARg Trophoblast invasion and placental formation, decidualization,
fertility issues. FGTB, either directly or indirectly, modulates UR and preventing endometriosis
and ER or CM, respectively; thereby, causing RIF. As mentioned AR Maintenance of endometrium physiology
RAR Embryonic development, growth, and reproduction
before, NRs also play multifarious roles in female reproduction
Rev-erb Regulating the circadian rhythm
and in sustaining viable pregnancies (Table 3). Any COUP-TFII Placental development and angiogenesis
perturbations in the expression of NRs could lead to LXR Control ovarian endocrine and exocrine function and uterine
spontaneous abortions. NRs, such as liver receptor homolog 1 contractility

Frontiers in Immunology | www.frontiersin.org 9 October 2020 | Volume 11 | Article 02161


Gupta and Gupta Role of Nuclear Receptors in FGTB

attention in stem cell biology (139–142); estrogen receptor the M. tuberculosis components also relay their effect through
(ERa), PR, and PPARg are all implicated in endometriosis orphan or adopted orphan receptors.
(143–146); and AR, thyroid receptor (TR), farnesoid X
receptor (FXR), Rev-erb, and constitutive androstane receptor
(CAR) are reported in tissue regeneration (147–152). Female DISCUSSION
fertility is compromised due to endometriosis. NRs are known to
modulate endometriosis; for example, loss of PR expression leads Globally, EPTB and, in particular, FGTB are growing problems
to endometriotic tissue becoming resistant to progesterone, with increasing rates of morbidity and mortality worldwide.
leading to endometriosis (146). PR helps to relieve pain in FGTB represents the most perilous form of EPTB and is the
endometriosis by limiting inflammation and the growth of leading cause of infertility and recurrent implantation failure in
endometriotic tissue PPARs and retinoid X receptor alpha are females. FGTB cases are asymptomatic in early stages, and
expressed in abortive trophoblastic tissue and are upregulated in untreated FGTB can cause permanent sterility through
extra villous trophoblast in recurrent miscarriages (153, 154). endometrial destruction and tubal damage. FGTB diagnosis is
M. tuberculosis modulates various cytokines’ milieu, such as arduous because of varied clinical presentations, misdiagnosis,
interferon g (IFNg) and interleukin- (IL2) in the endometrium associated comorbidities, arduousness in acquiring of clinical
and TNFa, IL-6, IL-4, and IL-8 in the blood (155, 156). samples, poor sensitivity, it is often asymptomatic and
Additionally, administration of IFNg, TNFa, and IL-2 is paucibacillary, emergence of drug resistance, lack of point of
reported to cause abortions in pregnant mice (102, 157, 158). care, impenetrable sites, and abstruse positioning of the organs.
Moreover, IL-1b is shown to promote endometriosis Likewise, the treatment of FGTB faces formidable challenges due
and angiogenesis (159, 160). Conversely, IL-6 and IL-10 to drug toxicity; HIV coinfection; obstetric, perioperative, and
are reported to have increased production in normal postoperative complications; reactivation; and emergence of
pregnancy compared to spontaneous abortion (103). Various drug-resistant bacteria. Our review rolls out the possible
proinflammatory, anti-inflammatory, and pleiotropic NRs, such remedies to prevent FGTB by precluding several of these
as retinoic acid receptor-related orphan receptor, nuclear challenges and also highlights the need for exaction of
receptor related (Nurr) 77, Nurr1, RORa, PXR, FXR, PPARa, biomarkers in FGTB.
LXR, Rev-erba, and PPARs, are known as immune modulators It is imperative to understand that FGTB adversely affects UR
as they can modulate different cytokines’ milieu (114, 161–167). and causes immune modulation, which promptly leads to
LXR is known to inhibit proinflammatory cytokine expression abortions and also reduces the chances of conception. We
and is also responsible for maternal-fetal cholesterol transport; emphasize the imperative mechanism of FGTB-associated
there is also a reduction in LXR expression in miscarriages (168, female infertility by highlighting the three major challenges,
169). Additionally, FGTB modulates pregnancy-related i.e., UR, ER, and CM. FGTB adversely affects various
hormones, such as human chorionic gonadotropin and endocrine hormones (progesterone, estrogen, and human
progesterone, which are known to function via their cognate chorionic gonadotropin), cytokines, growth factors (LIF and
endocrine receptors (98). Taken together, NRs seem to be a VEGF), and cell adhesion molecules (ITGAVB3, MECA79,
promising target to combat FGTB by addressing the issues of CDH1 and MUC-1), which are responsible for the
UR, ER, and CM. Extensive knowledge about the expression and maintenance of successful pregnancy. We epitomize the need
function of the NRs in FGTB is lacking and needs to to identify the molecular switches at the interface of FGTB and
be addressed. mechanisms associated with female infertility.
FGTB modulates the localized endometrial immune Given the above challenges in FGTB, there is an exigent need
repertoire, which has been reported to modulate UR. There are to identify FGTB-specific biomarkers from accessible samples.
various reports illustrating the function of the endometrial NRs have been reported as both pro- and anti-TB but have
immune repertoire in recurrent spontaneous miscarriage (170), gained less attention in FGTB. They are reported to modulate
polycystic ovarian syndrome (171), endometriosis (172), and female fertility and stem cell plasticity and are also known as
unexplained infertility (173). Given the reported role of NRs in immune modulators. We attempt to invoke interest in the
the regulation of uterine implantation and CM as well as being exploration of NRs as a novel therapeutic target in FGTB-
cognate to pregnancy-related hormones, for example, estrogen, associated female infertility and as a potential biomarker. NRs,
progesterone, human chorionic gonadotropin, and human which are cognate to pregnancy-related hormones (estrogen,
placental lactogen, which function via estrogen receptor, PR, progesterone, and human chorionic gonadotropin) and have
and VDR, respectively (174–178), they are good potential targets been cited in female reproduction and regeneration, prompt us
to alleviate the disease. NRs could be excellent host-directed to postulate them as a potential player and target to combat
targets in FGTB as evident from previous reports of NRs in TB. FGTB-associated female infertility by addressing the issues of
M. tuberculosis can modulate the expression of NRs by certain UR, ER, and CM.
crosstalk with its lipid repertoire. It would be interesting to see The topic is of immediate importance because of the abrupt
whether M. tuberculosis components interfere or modulate the increase in disease severity, drug resistance, and lack of a
interaction of pregnancy-related hormones with their cognate knowledge base of the major diagnostic and treatment
endocrine receptors. It would be interesting to decipher whether challenges, which leads to exacerbation in FGTB. Although a

Frontiers in Immunology | www.frontiersin.org 10 October 2020 | Volume 11 | Article 02161


Gupta and Gupta Role of Nuclear Receptors in FGTB

large number of biosignatures and mechanisms have been FUNDING


reported in FGTB, there is a paucity of specific targets and
biomarkers. Our review provides the conceptual advance; it This work was supported by the Council of Scientific and
postulates the role of NRs as a potential target and biomarker Industrial Research (CSIR) RC project (OLP115) to PG. This
in FGTB. The description is comprehensive and is factual. work is also supported by the Department of Biotechnology,
Fostering innovative research is required to (i) develop highly Ministry of Science and Technology, National Bioscience Award
permeable, safe, and nontoxic drugs with a novel mechanism of project (GAP-0162) to PG. We thank IMTECH, a CSIR
action and target; (ii) identify biomarkers and point-of-care laboratory, for the facilities and financial support. The funders
diagnostics; and (iii) develop a strategy to shorten the treatment had no role in study design, data collection, or interpretation or
regimens and reduce treatment-related functional disability. in any decision to submit the work for publication.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
SG and PG designed the study. SG and PG wrote the review. PG
contributed to the overall supervision of the manuscript. All authors We express regret for not citing the work of many our colleagues
contributed to the article and approved the submitted version. due to space constraints.

REFERENCES 15. Namavar Jahromi B, Parsanezhad ME, Ghane-Shirazi R. Female genital


tuberculosis and infertility. Int J Gynecol Obstet (2001) 75:269–72.
1. Sharma S, Mohan A. Extrapulmonary tuberculosis. Indian J Med Res (2004) doi: 10.1016/S0020-7292(01)00494-5
120:316—353. 16. Shahzad S. Investigation of the prevalence of female genital tract tuberculosis
2. World Health Organization Global Tuberculosis Report. (2019) 1–297. and its relation to female infertility:An observational analytical study. Iran J
3. Lee JY. Diagnosis and treatment of extrapulmonary tuberculosis. Tuberc Reprod Med (2012) 10:581–8.
Respir Dis (2015) 78:47–55. doi: 10.4046/trd.2015.78.2.47 17. Parikh FR, Nadkarni SG, Kamat SA, Naik N, Soonawala SB, Parikh RM.
4. Qian X, Nguyen DT, Lyu J, Albers AE, Bi X, Graviss EA. Risk factors for Genital tuberculosis—a major pelvic factor causing infertility in Indian
extrapulmonary dissemination of tuberculosis and associated mortality women. Fertil Steril (1997) 67:497–500. doi: 10.1016/S0015-0282(97)
during treatment for extrapulmonary tuberculosis. Emerg Microbes Infect 80076-3
(2018) 7:1–14. doi: 10.1038/s41426-018-0106-1 18. Tripathy SN, Tripathy SN. Infertility and pregnancy outcome in female
5. Jalali SM, Mashuri N, Tamannaie Z, Jesmi F, Pazouki A. Peritoneal genital tuberculosis. Int J Gynecol Obstet (2002) 76:159–63. doi: 10.1016/
Tuberculosis: An Uncommon Disease Calling for Close Scrutiny. Arch S0020-7292(01)00525-2
Clin Infect Dis (2013) 8:e16672. doi: 10.5812/archcid.16672 19. Gatongi DK, Gitau G, Kay V, Ngwenya S, Lafong C, Hasan A. Female genital
6. Hopewell PC. Overview of clinical tuberculosis in Tuberculosis. in: Bloom tuberculosis. Obstet Gynaecol (2005) 7:75–9. doi: 10.1576/toag.7.2.075.27000
B.R, editor. Pathogenesis, Protection, and Control. Washington DC: 20. Das P, Ahuja A, Gupta SD. Incidence, etiopathogenesis and pathological
American Society for Microbiology (1994) 25–46. doi: 10.1128/9781555 aspects of genitourinary tuberculosis in India: A journey revisited. Indian J
818357.ch3 Urol (2008) 24:356–61. doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.42618
7. Polena H, Boudou F, Tilleul S, Dubois-Colas N, Lecointe C, 21. Hasanzadeh M, Naderi HR, Hoshyar AH, Shabane S, Shahidsales S. Female
Rakotosamimanana N, et al. Mycobacterium tuberculosis exploits the genital tract tuberculosis presenting as ovarian cancer. J Res Med Sci Off J
formation of new blood vessels for its dissemination. Sci Rep (2016) Isfahan Univ Med Sci (2014) 19:184–9.
6:33162. doi: 10.1038/srep33162 22. Gungorduk K, Ulker V, Sahbaz A, Ark C, Ismet Tekirdag A. Postmenopausal
8. Muneer A, Macrae B, Krishnamoorthy S, Zumla A. Urogenital tuberculosis Tuberculosis Endometritis. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol (2007) 2007:27028.
— epidemiology, pathogenesis and clinical features. Nat Rev Urol (2019) doi: 10.1155/2007/27028
16:573–98. doi: 10.1038/s41585-019-0228-9 23. Margolis K, Wranz P, Kruger T, Joubert J, Odendaal H. Genital tuberculosis
9. Purohit MR, Purohit R, Mustafa T. Patient Health Seeking and Diagnostic at Tygerberg Hospital–prevalence, clinical presentation and diagnosis. South
Delay in Extrapulmonary Tuberculosis: A Hospital Based Study from Afr Med J Suid-Afr Tydskr Vir Geneeskd (1992) 81:12—15.
Central India. Tuberc Res Treat (2019) 2019:4840561. doi: 10.1155/2019/ 24. Qureshi R, Samad S, Hamid R, Lakha S. Female genital tuberculosis revisted.
4840561 JPMA J Pak Med Assoc (2001) 51:16—18.
10. Mirsaeidi M, Sadikot RT. Patients at high risk of tuberculosis recurrence. Int 25. Samal S, Gupta U, Agarwal P. Menstrual disorders in genital tuberculosis.
J Mycobacteriol (2018) 7:1–6. doi: 10.4103/ijmy.ijmy_164_17 J Indian Med Assoc (2000) 98:126—7, 129.
11. Eftekhar M, Pourmasumi S, Sabeti P, Aflatoonian A, Sheikhha MH. 26. Vadwai V, Boehme C, Nabeta P, Shetty A, Alland D, Rodrigues C. Xpert
Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in women with unexplained MTB/RIF: a new pillar in diagnosis of extrapulmonary tuberculosis? J Clin
infertility. Int J Reprod BioMed (2015) 13:749–54. doi: 10.29252/ Microbiol (2011) 49:2540–5. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02319-10
ijrm.13.12.749 27. Bartoloni A, Strohmeyer M, Bartalesi F, Messeri D, Tortoli E, Farese A, et al.
12. Duggal S, Duggal N, Hans C, Mahajan R. Female genital TB and HIV co- Evaluation of a rapid immunochromatographic test for the serologic
infection. Indian J Med Microbiol (2009) 27:361—363. doi: 10.4103/0255- diagnosis of tuberculosis in Italy. Clin Microbiol Infect (2003) 9:632–9.
0857.55461 doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0691.2003.00574.x
13. Al-Hakeem M, Schneider A. Genital tuberculosis: A rare cause of 28. Maertzdorf J, Kaufmann SH, Weiner J. Toward a Unified Biosignature for
vulvovaginal discharge and swelling. J Microbiol Infect Dis (2013) 03:141– Tuberculosis. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med (2015) 5:a018531. doi:
3. doi: 10.5799/ahinjs.02.2013.03.0097 10.1101/cshperspect.a018531
14. Sharma JB, Sneha J, Singh UB, Kumar S, Roy KK, Singh N, et al. 29. Berry MPR, Graham CM, McNab FW, Xu Z, Bloch SAA, Oni T, et al. An
Comparative Study of Laparoscopic Abdominopelvic and Fallopian Tube Interferon-Inducible Neutrophil-Driven Blood Transcriptional Signature in
Findings Before and After Antitubercular Therapy in Female Genital Human Tuberculosis. Nature (2010) 466:973–7. doi: 10.1038/nature09247
Tuberculosis With Infertility. J Minim Invasive Gynecol (2016) 23:215–22. 30. Maertzdorf J, Ota M, Repsilber D, Mollenkopf HJ, Weiner J, Hill PC, et al.
doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2015.09.023 Functional Correlations of Pathogenesis-Driven Gene Expression Signatures

Frontiers in Immunology | www.frontiersin.org 11 October 2020 | Volume 11 | Article 02161


Gupta and Gupta Role of Nuclear Receptors in FGTB

in Tuberculosis. PloS One (2011) 6:e26938. doi: 10.1371/journal. 51. Sharma JB, Roy KK, Pushparaj M, Karmakar D, Kumar S, Singh N.
pone.0026938 Increased Difficulties and Complications Encountered During
31. Duffy FJ, Weiner JI, Hansen S, Tabb DL, Suliman S, Thompson E, et al. Hysteroscopy in Women with Genital Tuberculosis. J Minim Invasive
Immunometabolic Signatures Predict Risk of Progression to Active Gynecol (2011) 18:660–5. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2011.05.008
Tuberculosis and Disease Outcome. Front Immunol (2019) 10:527. 52. Grace GA, Devaleenal DB, Natrajan M. Genital tuberculosis in females.
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00527 Indian J Med Res (2017) 145:425–36. doi: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_1550_15
32. Weiner J, Maertzdorf J, Sutherland JS, Duffy FJ, Thompson E, Suliman S, 53. Neonakis IK, Spandidos DA, Petinaki E. Female genital tuberculosis: A
et al. Metabolite changes in blood predict the onset of tuberculosis. Nat review. Scand J Infect Dis (2011) 43:564–72. doi: 10.3109/00365548.
Commun (2018) 9:5208. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07635-7 2011.568523
33. Walzl G, Mcnerney R, de Plessis N, Bates M, McHugh TD, Chegou NN, et al. 54. Sah SK, Shi X, Du S, Li X, Li CH, Shah S, et al. CT findings and analysis for
Tuberculosis: advances and challenges in development. Lancet Infect Dis misdiagnosis of female pelvic tuberculosis. Radiol Infect Dis (2017) 4:19–25.
(2018) 18:e119–e210. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30111-7 doi: 10.1016/j.jrid.2016.04.001
34. Roe JK, Thomas N, Gil E, Best K, Tsaliki E, Morris-Jones S, et al. Blood 55. Sharma S, Dutta S, Yadav A,K, Mandal A. A Rare Case of Cervical
transcriptomic diagnosis of pulmonary and extrapulmonary tuberculosis. Tuberculosis Masquerading as Carcinoma Cervix. Ann Woman Child
JCI Insight (2016) 1:e87238. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.87238 Health (2016) 2:C20–3.
35. MacLean E, Broger T, Yerlikaya S, Fernandez-Carballo BL, Pai M, 56. Gupta B, Shree S, Rajaram S, Goel N. Genital tuberculosis: Unusual
Denkinger CM. A systematic review of biomarkers to detect active presentations. Int J Mycobacteriol (2016) 5:357–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmyco.
tuberculosis. Nat Microbiol (2019) 4:748–58. doi: 10.1038/s41564-019- 2016.06.017
0380-2 57. Sharma JB, Kriplani A, Sharma E, Sharma S, Dharmendra S, Kumar S, et al.
36. Fortú n J, Martı́n-Dá vila P, Gó mez-Mampaso E, Vallejo A, Cuartero C, Multi drug resistant female genital tuberculosis: A preliminary report. Eur J
Gonzá lez-Garcı́a A, et al. Extra-pulmonary tuberculosis: a biomarker Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol (2017) 210:108–15. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.
analysis. Infection (2014) 42:649–54. doi: 10.1007/s15010-014-0602-8 2016.12.009
37. Kumar NP, Anuradha R, Andrade BB, Suresh N, Ganesh R, Shankar J, et al. 58. Bhanothu V, Theophilus JP, Rozati R. Use of Endo-Ovarian Tissue Biopsy
Circulating Biomarkers of Pulmonary and Extrapulmonary Tuberculosis in and Pelvic Aspirated Fluid for the Diagnosis of Female Genital Tuberculosis
Children. Clin Vaccine Immunol (2013) 20:704–11. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00 by Conventional versus Molecular Methods. PloS One (2014) 9:e98005.
038-13 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0098005
38. Elzein F, Elzein A, Mohammed N, Alswailem R. Miliary tuberculosis 59. Yousef AI, Ismael MF, Elshora AE, Abdou HE. Pulmonary tuberculosis in
mimicking systemic lupus erythematosus flare. Respir Med Case Rep patients with chronic renal failure at Zagazig University Hospitals. Egypt J
(2018) 25:216–9. doi: 10.1016/j.rmcr.2018.09.005 Chest Dis Tuberc (2014) 63:187–92. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcdt.2013.11.002
39. Boss JD, Shah CT, Oluwole O, Sheagren JN. TB Peritonitis Mistaken for 60. Gurumurthy P, Ramachandran G, Kumar AKH, Rajasekaran S,
Ovarian Carcinomatosis Based on an Elevated CA-125. Case Rep Med (2012) Padmapriyadarsini C, Swaminathan S, et al. Malabsorption of Rifampin
2012:215293–3. doi: 10.1155/2012/215293 and Isoniazid in HIV-Infected Patients With and Without Tuberculosis.
40. Seo H, Lee S, So H, Kim D, Kim S-O, Soh JS, et al. Temporal trends in the Clin Infect Dis (2004) 38:280–3. doi: 10.1086/380795
misdiagnosis rates between Crohn’s disease and intestinal tuberculosis. 61. Rajasekaran S, Khandelwal G. Drug therapy in spinal tuberculosis. Eur Spine
World J Gastroenterol (2017) 23:6306–14. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i34.6306 J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc
41. Sharma JB. Current Diagnosis and Management of Female Genital (2013) 22 Suppl 4:587–93. doi: 10.1007/s00586-012-2337-5
Tuberculosis. J Obstet Gynaecol India (2015) 65:362–71. doi: 10.1007/ 62. Sharma P, Tyagi P, Singla V, Bansal N, Kumar A, Arora A. Clinical and
s13224-015-0780-z biochemical profile of tuberculosis in patients with liver cirrhosis. J Clin Exp
42. Khanna SR, Kralovic SM, Prakash R. Tuberculous Meningitis in an Hepatol (2015) 5:8—13. doi: 10.1016/j.jceh.2015.01.003
Immunocompetent Host: A Case Report. Am J Case Rep (2016) 17:977– 63. Jullien S, Jain S, Ryan H, Ahuja V. Six-month therapy for abdominal
81. doi: 10.12659/ajcr.900762 tuberculosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2016) 11:CD012163.
43. Chapman CB, Whorton CM. Acute Generalized Miliary Tuberculosis in doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012163.pub2
Adults. N Engl J Med (1946) 235:239–48. doi: 10.1056/NEJM194608 64. Scharer L, JP S. Serum Transaminase Elevations and Other Hepatic
222350801 Abnormalities in Patients Receiving Isoniazid. Ann Intern Med (1969)
44. Sharma SK, Mohan A, Sharma A. Miliary tuberculosis: A new look at an old 71:1113–20. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-71-6-1113
foe. J Clin Tuberc Mycobact Dis (2016) 3:13–27. doi: 10.1016/ 65. Mitchell JR, Zimmerman HJ, Ishak KG, Thorgeirsson UP, Timbrell JA,
j.jctube.2016.03.003 Snodgrass WR, et al. Isoniazid Liver Injury: Clinical Spectrum, Pathology,
45. Vasankari T, Liippo K, Tala E. Overt and Cryptic Miliary Tuberculosis and Probable Pathogenesis. Ann Intern Med (1976) 84:181–92. doi: 10.7326/
Misdiagnosed until Autopsy. Scand J Infect Dis (2003) 35:794–6. 0003-4819-84-2-181
doi: 10.1080/00365540310016961 66. Ramappa V, Aithal GP. Hepatotoxicity Related to Anti-tuberculosis Drugs:
46. Schubert GE, Haltaufderheide T, Golz R. Frequency of Urogenital Mechanisms and Management. J Clin Exp Hepatol (2013) 3:37–49.
Tuberculosis in an Unselected Autopsy Series from 1928 to 1949 and doi: 10.1016/j.jceh.2012.12.001
1976 to 1989. Eur Urol (1992) 21:216–23. doi: 10.1159/000474841 67. Amedia C, Oettinger C. Unusual presentation of tuberculosis in chronic
47. Sharma JB, Karmakar D, Kumar R, Shamim SA, Kumar S, Singh N, et al. hemodialysis patients. Clin Nephrol (1977) 8:363–6.
Comparison of PET/CT with other imaging modalities in women with 68. Milburn H, Ashman N, Davies P, Doffman S, Drobniewski F, Khoo S, et al.
genital tuberculosis. Int J Gynecol Obstet (2012) 118:123–8. doi: 10.1016/ Guidelines for the prevention and management of Mycobacterium
j.ijgo.2012.02.020 tuberculosis infection and disease in adult patients with chronic kidney
48. Sharma JB, Karmakar D, Hari S, Singh N, Singh SP, Kumar S, et al. Magnetic disease. Thorax (2010) 65:557–70. doi: 10.1136/thx.2009.133173
resonance imaging findings among women with tubercular tubo-ovarian 69. Chen D, Yang Z, Yang Y, Zhan Z, Yang X. A Rare Case of Disseminated
masses. Int J Gynecol Obstet (2011) 113:76–80. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo. Tuberculosis of the Bone Marrow in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Case
2010.10.021 Report. Med (Baltimore) (2016) 95:e3552–2. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000
49. Sethi S, Dhaliwal L, Dey P, Kaur H, Yadav R, Sethi S. Loop-mediated 000003552
isothermal amplification assay for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis 70. Nau R, Sörgel F, Eiffert H. Penetration of Drugs through the Blood-
complex in infertile women. Indian J Med Microbiol (2016) 34:322–7. Cerebrospinal Fluid/Blood-Brain Barrier for Treatment of Central
doi: 10.4103/0255-0857.188323 Nervous System Infections. Clin Microbiol Rev (2010) 23:858–83.
50. Efared B, Sidibé IS, Erregad F, Hammas N, Chbani L, El Fatemi H. Female doi: 10.1128/CMR.00007-10
genital tuberculosis: a clinicopathological report of 13 cases. J Surg Case Rep 71. Chang C-H, Chen Y-F, Wu V-C, Shu C-C, Lee C-H, Wang J-Y, et al. Acute
(2019) 3:rjz083. doi: 10.1093/jscr/rjz083 kidney injury due to anti-tuberculosis drugs: a five-year experience in an

Frontiers in Immunology | www.frontiersin.org 12 October 2020 | Volume 11 | Article 02161


Gupta and Gupta Role of Nuclear Receptors in FGTB

aging population. BMC Infect Dis (2014) 14:23–3. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334- effect of different hormone therapies. Reprod BioMed Online (2010) 21:349–
14-23 59. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2010.04.012
72. Pazhayattil GS, Shirali AC. Drug-induced impairment of renal function. Int J 92. Chowdhury R, Paine S, Bhattacharjee B, Chatterjee S. Infestation Of
Nephrol Renov Dis (2014) 7:457–68. doi: 10.2147/IJNRD.S39747 Endometrium By Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Bacilli-Cause Of
73. Beebe A, Seaworth B, Patil N. Rifampicin-induced nephrotoxicity in a Reproductive Failure. Al Ameen J Med Sci (2010) 3:322–31.
tuberculosis patient. J Clin Tuberc Mycobact Dis (2015) 1:13–5. 93. Hambartsoumian E. Endometrial Leukemia Inhibitory Factor (LIF) as a
doi: 10.1016/j.jctube.2015.09.001 Possible Cause of Unexplained Infertility and Multiple Failures of
74. Ilmer M, Bergauer F, Friese K, Mylonas I. Genital Tuberculosis as the Cause Implantation. Am J Reprod Immunol (1998) 39:137–43. doi: 10.1111/
of Tuboovarian Abscess in an Immunosuppressed Patient. Infect Dis Obstet j.1600-0897.1998.tb00345.x
Gynecol (2010) 2009:745060. doi: 10.1155/2009/745060 94. Cheng J-G, Chen JR, Hernandez L, Alvord WG, Stewart CL. Dual control of
75. Gautam S, Jain A, Akhtar S, Priyadarshini A, Jaiswar SP. Serum Vitamin D LIF expression and LIF receptor function regulate Stat3 activation at the
Level as a Risk Factor for Female Genital Tuberculosis (FGTB). J Clin Diagn onset of uterine receptivity and embryo implantation. Proc Natl Acad Sci
Res (2017) 11:DC18–DC20. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/30084.10636 (2001) 98:8680–5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.151180898
76. Mahajan N, Naidu P, Kaur S. Insight into the diagnosis and management of 95. Fedorcsá k P, Storeng R. Effects of Leptin and Leukemia Inhibitory Factor on
subclinical genital tuberculosis in women with infertility. J Hum Reprod Sci Preimplantation Development and STAT3 Signaling of Mouse Embryos In
(2016) 9:135–44. doi: 10.4103/0974-1208.192043 Vitro1. Biol Reprod (2003) 69:1531–8. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.103.019034
77. Ballon SC, Clewell WH, Lamb EJ. Reactivation of silent pelvic tuberculosis 96. Invernizzi A, Franzetti F, Viola F, Meroni L, Staurenghi G. Optic Nerve Head
by reconstructive tubal surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol (1975) 122:991. Tubercular Granuloma Successfully Treated with Anti-VEGF Intravitreal
doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(75)90363-4 Injections in Addition to Systemic Therapy. Eur J Ophthalmol (2014)
78. Sharma J, Roy K, Pushparaj M, Gupta N, Jain S, Malhotra N, et al. Genital 25:270–2. doi: 10.5301/ejo.5000528
tuberculosis: An important cause of Asherman’s syndrome in India. Arch 97. Oehlers SH, Cronan MR, Scott NR, Thomas MI, Okuda KS, Walton EM,
Gynecol Obstet (2008) 277:37–41. doi: 10.1007/s00404-007-0419-0 et al. Interception of host angiogenic signalling limits mycobacterial growth.
79. Sharma JB, Mohanraj P, Jain SK, Roy KK. Increased complication rates in Nature (2015) 517:612–5. doi: 10.1038/nature13967
vaginal hysterectomy in genital tuberculosis. Arch Gynecol Obstet (2011) 98. Kumar A, Rattan A. Antigonadotrophic effect of Mycobacterium
283:831–5. doi: 10.1007/s00404-010-1463-8 tuberculosis. Horm Metab Res Horm Stoffwechselforschung Horm Metab
80. Al eryani AA, Abdelrub AS, Al Harazi AH. Genital tuberculosis is common (1997) 29:501–3. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-979088
among females with tubal factor infertility: Observational study. Alex J Med 99. Malhotra N, Sharma V, Bahadur A, Sharma JB, Roy KK, Kumar S. The effect
(2015) 51:321–4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajme.2014.11.004 of tuberculosis on ovarian reserve among women undergoing IVF in India.
81. Kulshrestha V, Kriplani A, Agarwal N, Singh UB, Rana T. Genital Int J Gynaecol Obstet Off Organ Int Fed Gynaecol Obstet (2012) 117:40–4.
tuberculosis among infertile women and fertility outcome after doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2011.10.034
antitubercular therapy. Int J Gynecol Obstet (2011) 113:229–34. 100. Danforth DR, Arbogast LK, Mroueh J, Kim MH, Kennard EA, Seifer DB,
doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.12.014 et al. Dimeric inhibin: a direct marker of ovarian aging. Fertil Steril (1998)
82. Jindal UN, Verma S, Bala Y. Favorable infertility outcomes following anti- 70:119–23. doi: 10.1016/S0015-0282(98)00127-7
tubercular treatment prescribed on the sole basis of a positive polymerase 101. Jirge PR, Chougule SM, Keni A, Kumar S, Modi D. Latent genital
chain reaction test for endometrial tuberculosis. Hum Reprod (2012) tuberculosis adversely affects the ovarian reserve in infertile women. Hum
27:1368–74. doi: 10.1093/humrep/des076 Reprod (2018) 33:1262–9. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dey117
83. Sharma JB, Sharma E, Sharma S, Dharmendra S. Female genital tuberculosis: 102. Makhseed M, Raghupathy R, Azizieh F, Omu A, Al-Shamali E, Ashkanani L.
Revisited. Indian J Med Res (2018) 148:S71–83. doi: 10.4103/ijmr. Th1 and Th2 cytokine profiles in recurrent aborters with successful
IJMR_648_18 pregnancy and with subsequent abortions. Hum Reprod (2001) 16:2219–
84. Pang Y, An J, Shu W, Huo F, Chu N, Gao M, et al. Epidemiology of 26. doi: 10.1093/humrep/16.10.2219
Extrapulmonary Tuberculosis among Inpatients, China, 2008–2017. Emerg 103. Raghupathy R, Makhseed M, Azizieh F, Omu A, Gupta M, Farhat R.
Infect Dis J (2019) 25:457–64. doi: 10.3201/eid2503.180572 Cytokine production by maternal lymphocytes during normal human
85. Sethi S, Biswal M, Chatterjee S, Mewara A, Gupta D, Kumar S, et al. pregnancy and in unexplained recurrent spontaneous abortion. Hum
Susceptibility pattern among pulmonary and extrapulmonary isolates of Reprod (2000) 15:713–8. doi: 10.1093/humrep/15.3.713
Mycobacterium tuberculosis in north India. Afr J Microbiol Res (2012) 104. de Almeida AS, Fiske CT, Sterling TR, Kalams SA. Increased frequency of
6:3696–9. doi: 10.5897/AJMR12.195. regulatory T cells and T lymphocyte activation in persons with previously
86. Dedrick RM, Guerrero-Bustamante CA, Garlena RA, Russell DA, Ford K, treated extrapulmonary tuberculosis. Clin Vaccine Immunol CVI (2012)
Harris K, et al. Engineered bacteriophages for treatment of a patient with a 19:45–52. doi: 10.1128/CVI.05263-11
disseminated drug-resistant Mycobacterium abscessus. Nat Med (2019) 105. Hasan Z, Jamil B, Ashraf M, Islam M, Yusuf MS, Khan JA, et al. ESAT6-
25:730–3. doi: 10.1038/s41591-019-0437-z induced IFNgamma and CXCL9 can differentiate severity of tuberculosis.
87. Khusro A, Aarti C, Agastian P. Anti-tubercular peptides: A quest of future PloS One (2009) 4:e5158. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005158
therapeutic weapon to combat tuberculosis. Asian Pac J Trop Med (2016) 106. Weikum ER, Liu X, Ortlund EA. The nuclear receptor superfamily: A
9:1023–34. doi: 10.1016/j.apjtm.2016.09.005 structural perspective. Protein Sci (2018) 27:1876–92. doi: 10.1002/pro.3496
88. Vuorela P, Carpé n O, Tulppala M, Halmesmäki E. VEGF. its receptors and 107. Leopold Wager CM, Arnett E, Schlesinger LS. Macrophage nuclear
the Tie receptors in recurrent miscarriage. Mol Hum Reprod (2000) 6:276– receptors: Emerging key players in infectious diseases. PloS Pathog (2019)
82. doi: 10.1093/molehr/6.3.276 15:e1007585. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1007585
89. Marwood M, Visser K, Salamonsen LA, Dimitriadis E. Interleukin-11 and 108. Bhagyaraj E, Nanduri R, Saini A, Dkhar HK, Ahuja N, Chandra V, et al.
Leukemia Inhibitory Factor Regulate the Adhesion of Endometrial Epithelial Human Xenobiotic Nuclear Receptor PXR Augments Mycobacterium
Cells: Implications in Fertility Regulation. Endocrinology (2009) 150:2915– tuberculosis Survival. J Immunol Baltim Md 1950 (2016) 197:244—255.
23. doi: 10.1210/en.2008-1538 doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1600203
90. Subramani E, Madogwe E, Ray CD, Dutta SK, Chakravarty B, Bordignon V, 109. Dkhar HK, Nanduri R, Mahajan S, Dave S, Saini A, Somavarapu AK, Arora
et al. Dysregulated leukemia inhibitory factor and its receptor regulated A, et al. Mycobacterium tuberculosis keto-mycolic acid and macrophage
signal transducers and activators of transcription 3 pathway: a possible cause nuclear receptor TR4 modulate foamy biogenesis in granulomas: a case of a
for repeated implantation failure in women with dormant genital heterologous and noncanonical ligand-receptor pair. J Immunol (2014)
tuberculosis? Fertil Steril (2016) 105:1076—1084. doi: 10.1016/ 193:295–305. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1400092
j.fertnstert.2015.12.015 110. Saini A, Mahajan S, Ahuja N, Bhagyaraj E, Kalra R, Gupta P. An Accord of
91. Casals G, Ordi J, Creus M, Fá bregues F, Carmona F, Casamitjana R, et al. Nuclear Receptor Expression in M. Tuberculosis Infected Macrophages and
Osteopontin and avb3 integrin as markers of endometrial receptivity: the Dendritic Cells. Sci Rep (2018) 8:2296. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-20769-4

Frontiers in Immunology | www.frontiersin.org 13 October 2020 | Volume 11 | Article 02161


Gupta and Gupta Role of Nuclear Receptors in FGTB

111. Bhagyaraj E, Tiwari D, Ahuja N, Nanduri R, Saini A, Kalra R, et al. A human 130. Wei S-Q, Audibert F, Luo Z-C, Nuyt AM, Masse B, Julien P, et al. Maternal
xenobiotic nuclear receptor contributes to nonresponsiveness of plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels, angiogenic factors, and preeclampsia.
Mycobacterium tuberculosis to the antituberculosis drug rifampicin. J Biol Am J Obstet Gynecol (2013) 208:390.e1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.03.025
Chem (2018) 293:3747–57. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M117.818377 131. Wei S-Q, Qi H-P, Luo Z-C, Fraser WD. Maternal vitamin D status and
112. Guirado E, Rajaram MV, Chawla A, Daigle J, La Perle KM, Arnett E, et al. adverse pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J
Deletion of PPARg in lung macrophages provides an immunoprotective Matern-Fetal Neonatal Med Off J Eur Assoc Perinat Med Fed Asia Ocean
response against M. tuberculosis infection in mice. Tuberc Edinb Scotl (2018) Perinat Soc Int Soc Perinat Obstet (2013) 26:889—899. doi: 10.3109/
111:170–7. doi: 10.1016/j.tube.2018.06.012 14767058.2013.765849
113. Liu PT, Stenger S, Li H, Wenzel L, Tan BH, Krutzik SR, et al. Toll-Like 132. Wetendorf M, DeMayo FJ. The progesterone receptor regulates
Receptor Triggering of a Vitamin D-Mediated Human Antimicrobial implantation, decidualization, and glandular development via a complex
Response. Science (2006) 311:1770–3. doi: 10.1126/science.1123933 paracrine signaling network. Mol Cell Endocrinol (2012) 357:108–18.
114. Chandra V, Mahajan S, Saini A, Dkhar HK, Nanduri R, Raj EB, et al. Human doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2011.10.028
IL10 repression by Reverb alpha ameliorates Mycobacterium tuberculosis 133. Hapangama DK, Kamal AM, Bulmer JN. Estrogen receptor b: the guardian
clearance. J Biol Chem (2013) 288:10692–702. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.455915 of the endometrium. Hum Reprod Update (2014) 21:174–93. doi: 10.1093/
115. Korf H, Vander Beken S, Romano M, Steffensen KR, Stijlemans B, humupd/dmu053
Gustafsson J-Å, et al. Liver X receptors contribute to the protective 134. Schaiff WT, Barak Y, Sadovsky Y. The pleiotropic function of PPARg in the
immune response against Mycobacterium tuberculosis in mice. J Clin placenta. Mol Cell Endocrinol (2006) 249:10–5. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2006.02.009
Invest (2009) 119:1626–37. doi: 10.1172/JCI35288 135. Yessoufou A, Hichami A, Besnard P, Moutairou K, Khan NA. Peroxisome
116. Zhang Y, Zhu H, Yang X, Guo S, Liang Q, Lu Y, et al. Serum vitamin D level Proliferator-Activated Receptor a Deficiency Increases the Risk of Maternal
and vitamin D receptor genotypes may be associated with tuberculosis Abortion and Neonatal Mortality in Murine Pregnancy with or without
clinical characteristics: A case-control study. Med (Baltimore) (2018) 97: Diabetes Mellitus: Modulation of T Cell Differentiation. Endocrinology
e11732. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011732 (2006) 147:4410–8. doi: 10.1210/en.2006-0067
117. Roodgar M, Ross CT, Tarara R, Lowenstine L, Dandekar S, Smith DG. Gene 136. Komar CM. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) and
expression and TB pathogenesis in rhesus macaques: TR4, CD40, CD40L, ovarian function–implications for regulating steroidogenesis,
FAS (CD95), and TNF are host genetic markers in peripheral blood differentiation, and tissue remodeling. Reprod Biol Endocrinol RBE (2005)
mononuclear cells that are associated with severity of TB lesions. Infect 3:41. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-3-41
Genet Evol (2015) 36:396–409. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2015.10.010 137. Goldstein CA, Smith YR. Sleep, Circadian Rhythms, and Fertility. Curr Sleep
118. Bertolin K, Gossen J, Schoonjans K, Murphy B. The Orphan Nuclear Med Rep (2016) 2:206–17. doi: 10.1007/s40675-016-0057-9
Receptor Nr5a2 Is Essential for Luteinization in the Female Mouse Ovary. 138. Bugge A, Feng D, Everett LJ, Briggs ER, Mullican SE, Wang F, et al. Rev-erba
Endocrinology (2014) 155:1931–43. doi: 10.1210/en.2013-1765 and Rev-erbb coordinately protect the circadian clock and normal metabolic
119. Vasquez YM, DeMayo FJ. Role of nuclear receptors in blastocyst function. Genes Dev (2012) 26:657–67. doi: 10.1101/gad.186858.112
implantation. Semin Cell Dev Biol (2013) 24:724–35. doi: 10.1016/ 139. Chute JP, Ross JR, McDonnell DP. Minireview: Nuclear receptors,
j.semcdb.2013.08.004 hematopoiesis, and stem cells. Mol Endocrinol Baltim Md (2010) 24:1–10.
120. Duggavathi R, Volle DH, Mataki C, Antal MC, Messaddeq N, Auwerx J, et al. doi: 10.1210/me.2009-0332
Liver receptor homolog 1 is essential for ovulation. Genes Dev (2008) 140. Purton L, Bernstein I, Collins S. All-trans retinoic acid enhances the long-
22:1871–6. doi: 10.1101/gad.472008 term repopulating activity of cultured hematopoietic stem cells. Blood (2000)
121. Kam RKT, Deng Y, Chen Y, Zhao H. Retinoic acid synthesis and functions in 95:470–7. doi: 10.1182/blood.V95.2.470
early embryonic development. Cell Biosci (2012) 2:11. doi: 10.1186/2045- 141. Mullen EM, Gu P, Cooney AJ. Nuclear Receptors in Regulation of Mouse ES
3701-2-11 Cell Pluripotency and Differentiation. PPAR Res (2007) 2007:61563.
122. Pereira FA, Qiu Y, Zhou G, Tsai MJ, Tsai SY. The orphan nuclear receptor doi: 10.1155/2007/61563
COUP-TFII is required for angiogenesis and heart development. Genes Dev 142. Mullican SE, Zhang S, Konopleva M, Ruvolo V, Andreeff M, Milbrandt J,
(1999) 13:1037–49. doi: 10.1101/gad.13.8.1037 et al. Abrogation of nuclear receptors Nr4a3 andNr4a1 leads to development
123. Petit FG, Jamin SP, Kurihara I, Behringer RR, DeMayo FJ, Tsai M-J, et al. of acute myeloid leukemia. Nat Med (2007) 13:730–5. doi: 10.1038/nm1579
Deletion of the orphan nuclear receptor COUP-TFII in uterus leads to 143. Han SJ, O’Malley BW. The dynamics of nuclear receptors and nuclear
placental deficiency. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (2007) 104:6293–8. receptor coregulators in the pathogenesis of endometriosis. Hum Reprod
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0702039104 Update (2014) 20:467–84. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmu002
124. Jeyasuria P, Ikeda Y, Jamin SP, Zhao L, de Rooij DG, Themmen APN, et al. 144. Lebovic DI, Kavoussi SK, Lee J, Banu SK, Arosh JA. PPARg Activation
Cell-Specific Knockout of Steroidogenic Factor 1 Reveals Its Essential Roles Inhibits Growth and Survival of Human Endometriotic Cells by Suppressing
in Gonadal Function. Mol Endocrinol (2004) 18:1610–9. doi: 10.1210/ Estrogen Biosynthesis and PGE2 Signaling. Endocrinology (2013) 154:4803–
me.2003-0404 13. doi: 10.1210/en.2013-1168
125. Pelusi C, Ikeda Y, Zubair M, Parker KL. Impaired Follicle Development and 145. Pellegrini C, Gori I, Achtari C, Hornung D, Chardonnens E, Wunder D, et al.
Infertility in Female Mice Lacking Steroidogenic Factor 1 in Ovarian The expression of estrogen receptors as well as GREB1, c-MYC, and
Granulosa Cells. Biol Reprod (2008) 79:1074–83. doi: 10.1095/ cyclin D1, estrogen-regulated genes implicated in proliferation, is
biolreprod.108.069435 increased in peritoneal endometriosis. Fertil Steril (2012) 98:1200–8.
126. Cloke B, Christian M. The role of androgens and the androgen receptor in doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.06.056
cycling endometrium. Endocrinol Uterus Uterine-Relat Disord (2012) 146. Bulun SE, Cheng Y-H, Yin P, Imir G, Utsunomiya H, Attar E, et al.
358:166–75. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2011.06.031 Progesterone resistance in endometriosis: Link to failure to metabolize
127. Lobaccaro JMA, Gallot D, Lumbroso S, Mouzat K. Liver X Receptors and estradiol. Int Workshop 11beta 17beta-Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenases
female reproduction: When cholesterol meets fertility! J Endocrinol Invest (2006) 248:94–103. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2005.11.041
(2013) 36:55–60. doi: 10.3275/8765 147. Bielecki B, Mattern C, Ghoumari AM, Javaid S, Smietanka K, Abi Ghanem C,
128. Shahbazi M, Jeddi-Tehrani M, Zareie M, Salek-Moghaddam A, Akhondi et al. Unexpected central role of the androgen receptor in the spontaneous
MM, Bahmanpoor M, et al. Expression profiling of vitamin D receptor in regeneration of myelin. Proc Natl Acad Sci (2016) 113:14829–34.
placenta, decidua and ovary of pregnant mice. Placenta (2011) 32:657–64. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1614826113
doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2011.06.013 148. Chen W-D, Wang Y-D, Zhang L, Shiah S, Wang M, Yang F, et al. Farnesoid
129. Irani M, Merhi Z. Role of vitamin D in ovarian physiology and its X receptor alleviates age-related proliferation defects in regenerating mouse
implication in reproduction: a systematic review. Fertil Steril (2014) livers by activating forkhead box m1b transcription. Hepatology (2010)
102:460–8. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.04.046 51:953–62. doi: 10.1002/hep.23390

Frontiers in Immunology | www.frontiersin.org 14 October 2020 | Volume 11 | Article 02161


Gupta and Gupta Role of Nuclear Receptors in FGTB

149. Dierickx P, Van Laake LW, Geijsen N. Circadian clocks: from stem cells to 165. Hollman DAA, Milona A, van Erpecum KJ, van Mil SWC. Anti-
tissue homeostasis and regeneration. EMBO Rep (2018) 19:18–28. inflammatory and metabolic actions of FXR: Insights into molecular
doi: 10.15252/embr.201745130 mechanisms. Biochim Biophys Acta BBA - Mol Cell Biol Lipids (2012)
150. Huang W, Ma K, Zhang J, Qatanani M, Cuvillier J, Liu J, et al. Nuclear 1821:1443–52. doi: 10.1016/j.bbalip.2012.07.004
Receptor-Dependent Bile Acid Signaling Is Required for Normal Liver 166. Nejati Moharrami N, Bjørkøy Tande E, Ryan L, Espevik T, Boyartchuk V.
Regeneration. Science (2006) 312:233–6. doi: 10.1126/science.1121435 RORa controls inflammatory state of human macrophages. PloS One (2018)
151. Pantos C, Mourouzis I. Thyroid hormone receptor a1 as a novel therapeutic 13:e0207374. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207374
target for tissue repair. Ann Transl Med (2018) 6:254. doi: 10.21037/ 167. Maijenburg MW, Gilissen C, Melief SM, Kleijer M, Weijer K, Ten Brinke A,
atm.2018.06.12 et al. Nuclear receptors Nur77 and Nurr1 modulate mesenchymal stromal
152. Tschuor C, Kachaylo E, Limani P, Raptis DA, Linecker M, Tian Y, et al. cell migration. Stem Cells Dev (2012) 21:228–38. doi: 10.1089/scd.2011.0076
Constitutive androstane receptor (Car)-driven regeneration protects liver 168. Knabl J, Pestka A, Hüttenbrenner R, Plösch T, Ensenauer R, Welbergen L,
from failure following tissue loss. J Hepatol (2016) 65:66–74. doi: 10.1016/ et al. The liver x receptor in correlation with other nuclear receptors in
j.jhep.2016.02.040 spontaneous and recurrent abortions. PPAR Res (2013) 2013:575604.
153. Pestka A, Toth B, Kuhn C, Hofmann S, Wiest I, Wypior G, et al. Retinoid X doi: 10.1155/2013/575604
receptor a and retinoids are key regulators in apoptosis of trophoblasts of 169. Bełtowski J, Semczuk A. Liver X receptor (LXR) and the reproductive system
patients with recurrent miscarriages. J Mol Endocrinol (2011) 47:145—156. – a potential novel target for therapeutic intervention. Pharmacol Rep (2010)
doi: 10.1530/jme-11-0002 62:15–27. doi: 10.1016/S1734-1140(10)70239-5
154. Toth B, Bastug M, Scholz C, Arck P, Schulze S, Kunze S, et al. Leptin and 170. Banerjee P, Ghosh S, Dutta M, Subramani E, Khalpada J, Roychoudhury S,
peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors: impact on normal and et al. Identification of key contributory factors responsible for vascular
disturbed first trimester human pregnancy. Histol Histopathol (2008) dysfunction in idiopathic recurrent spontaneous miscarriage. PloS One
23:1465–75. doi: 10.14670/hh-23.1465 (2013) 8:e80940. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080940
155. Rose Ukibe N, Ukibe S, Ikechukwu Onwubuya E, Onyenekwe C, Nwamaka 171. Piltonen TT. Polycystic ovary syndrome: Endometrial markers. Best Pract
Monago I, Emelumadu O, et al. Possible impact of variations in some Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol (2016) 37:66–79. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.
Cytokine levels during menstrual cycle in women of reproductive age 2016.03.008
infected with Pulmonary Tuberculosis at Nnewi, Nigeria. Clin Invest 172. Achache H, Revel A. Endometrial receptivity markers, the journey to
(2018) 08:63–73. doi: 10.4172/Clinical-Investigation.1000130 successful embryo implantation. Hum Reprod Update (2006) 12:731–46.
156. Datta A, Chaudhuri A, Chatterjee S, Chowdhury R, Bhattacharya B. Role of doi: 10.1093/humupd/dml004
endometrial cytokines of the female genital tract tuberculosis in the context 173. Lessey BA, Castelbaum AJ, Sawin SW, Sun J. Integrins as markers of uterine
of infertility. BLDE Univ J Health Sci (2018) 3:24–30. doi: 10.4103/ receptivity in women with primary unexplained infertility. Fertil Steril (1995)
bjhs.bjhs_1_18 63:535–42. doi: 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)57422-6
157. Chaouat G, Menu E, Clark DA, Dy M, Minkowski M, Wegmann TG. 174. Wetendorf M, DeMayo FJ. Progesterone receptor signaling in the initiation
Control of fetal survival in CBA × DBA/2 mice by lymphokine therapy. of pregnancy and preservation of a healthy uterus. Int J Dev Biol (2014)
J Reprod Fertil (1990) 89:447–58. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0890447 58:95–106. doi: 10.1387/ijdb.140069mw
158. Tezabwala BU, Johnson PM, Rees RC. Inhibition of pregnancy viability in 175. Stephanou A, Ross R, Handwerger S. Regulation of human placental lactogen
mice following IL-2 administration. Immunology (1989) 67:115–9. expression by 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3. Endocrinology (1994) 135:2651–6.
159. Fakih H, Baggett B, Holtz G, Tsang K-Y, Lee JC, Williamson HO. doi: 10.1210/endo.135.6.7988455
Interleukin-1: a possible role in the infertility associated with 176. Shin JS, Choi MY, Longtine MS, Nelson DM. Vitamin D effects on pregnancy
endometriosis. Fertil Steril (1987) 47:213–7. doi: 10.1016/S0015-0282(16) and the placenta. Placenta (2010) 31:1027–34. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2010.08.015
49993-0 177. Murthi P, Yong HEJ, Ngyuen TPH, Ellery S, Singh H, Rahman R, et al. Role
160. Lebovic DI, Bentzien F, Chao VA, Garrett EN, Meng YG, Taylor RN. of the Placental Vitamin D Receptor in Modulating Feto-Placental Growth in
Induction of an angiogenic phenotype in endometriotic stromal cell Fetal Growth Restriction and Preeclampsia-Affected Pregnancies. Front
cultures by interleukin-1b. Mol Hum Reprod (2000) 6:269–75. Physiol (2016) 7:43. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2016.00043
doi: 10.1093/molehr/6.3.269 178. Barrera D, Avila E, Herná ndez G, Mé ndez I, Gonzá lez L, Halhali A, et al.
161. Straus DS, Glass CK. Anti-inflammatory actions of PPAR ligands: new Calcitriol affects hCG gene transcription in cultured human
insights on cellular and molecular mechanisms. Trends Immunol (2007) syncytiotrophoblasts. Reprod Biol Endocrinol RBE (2008) 6:3. doi: 10.1186/
28:551–8. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2007.09.003 1477-7827-6-3
162. Pourcet B, Gage MC, Leó n TE, Waddington KE, Pello OM, Steffensen KR,
et al. The nuclear receptor LXR modulates interleukin-18 levels in Conflict of Interest: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the
macrophages through multiple mechanisms. Sci Rep (2016) 6:25481. absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a
doi: 10.1038/srep25481 potential conflict of interest.
163. Lo Verme J, Fu J, Astarita G, La Rana G, Russo R, Calignano A, et al. The
Nuclear Receptor Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-a Mediates Copyright © 2020 Gupta and Gupta. This is an open-access article distributed under
the Anti-Inflammatory Actions of Palmitoylethanolamide. Mol Pharmacol the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution
(2005) 67:15–19. doi: 10.1124/mol.104.006353 or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the
164. Sun M, Cui W, Woody SK, Staudinger JL. Pregnane X Receptor Modulates copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is
the Inflammatory Response in Primary Cultures of Hepatocytes. Drug Metab cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or
Dispos (2015) 43:335–43. doi: 10.1124/dmd.114.062307 reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

Frontiers in Immunology | www.frontiersin.org 15 October 2020 | Volume 11 | Article 02161

You might also like