Lalić, Danijela Và C NG S (2020)
Lalić, Danijela Và C NG S (2020)
Lalić, Danijela Và C NG S (2020)
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
Strategic internal communication plays an important role in the process of
engaging employees to achieve organizational goals by building transparency and
Joy
Advances in Public Relations and Communication Management, Volume 5, 75–91
Copyright © 2021 Emerald Publishing Limited
All rights of reproduction in any form reserved
ISSN: 2398-3914/doi:10.1108/S2398-391420200000005007
75
76 DANIJELA LALIĆ ET AL.
fostering trust between management and employees. On the other hand, in the
human resources and organizational behaviour research community, the scope has
been shifted towards investigating the positive aspects of work, making employee
engagement an important subject of numerous studies on work-related well-being.
If strategic internal communication has the capacity to influence the behaviour of
employees, the key question is: how can we use internal communication to
transform engaged employees into happy employees? Even though the positive
effects of both internal communication and employee engagement have been
studied, their impact on employee happiness has not been thoroughly examined.
THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVES
AND RESEARCH QUESTIONS
Internal Communication and Employee Happiness
Happiness at work becomes essential for the development of highly
motivated, dedicated and engaged employees. This is a research topic with a
growing importance among scholars and practitioners, and requires a more
complex and intensive approach. Happiness at work is crucial both for organi-
zation and workers (Salas-Vallina, Alegre, & Guerrero, 2018). There is an
ongoing debate on what is actually happiness at work and how helpful it could be
in a work context (Barrena-Martı́nez, López-Fernández, & Romero-Fernández,
2017; Luthans & Avolio, 2009; Salas-Vallina, López-Cabrales, Alegre, &
Fernández, 2017). Some of the main concepts that aim to improve an employee’s
quality of life at work are job satisfaction, engagement, commitment and well-
being (Salas-Vallina et al., 2018). While well-being has been widely considered in
academic research, happiness in a work context has not been extensively used
among researchers, probably because of difficulties caused in defining and
measuring. Some authors suggest that happiness at work needs to be understood
as a complex concept that combines factors such as engagement, job satisfaction
and organizational commitment (Salas-Vallina et al., 2018). In this chapter, the
overall ‘subjective happiness’ will be examined and measured as a global, sub-
jective assessment of whether one is a happy or unhappy person.
Even though internal communication represents an important part of the
organizational everyday life, the relationship between internal communication
satisfaction (ICS) and employee happiness was not examined before. One case
study (Isfahani, Yarali, & Ali Kazemi, 2012) examined the effects of internal
marketing on employee happiness and found that internal marketing promotes
employee mental health and happiness.
Leiter, 2011). One of the main benefits of internal communication is its capacity
to effectively transfer organizational values to all employees and stimulate them
to be more involved in organizational goals (Welch, 2011).
Employee engagement is defined in multiple terms, but in general it includes
numerous organizational incentives to involve employees, business partners, cus-
tomers and other stakeholders in its activities. Many authors agree that one of the
most important drivers of employee engagement is internal communication (e.g.,
Tkalac Verčič & Pološki Vokić, 2017), especially innovative organizational
communication initiatives, open channels of communication, constant feedback and
information sharing (e.g., Bakker & Demerouti, 2008; Caesens, Stinglhamber, &
Luypaert, 2014; Fearon, McLaughlin, & Morris, 2013). There is a consensus among
researchers and academics that effective internal communication has a positive
impact in developing and maintaining employee engagement (Karanges, Johnston,
Beatson, & Lings, 2015; Welch, 2011), as well as a great contribution to the
organization’s productivity, performance and external customer orientation (Downs
& Adrian, 2004; Tkalac Verčič & Pološki Vokić, 2017). It has been found that ICS
is extremely important to highly engaged employees and identified as a prerequisite
to employee engagement (Tkalac Verčič & Pološki Vokić, 2017). However, forced
and unlimited increase of employee engagement can cause negative effects, where
overengagement can be potentially damaging to interpersonal interaction and drive
additional workplace stress (MacCormick, Dery, & Kolb, 2012), while poor
communication reduces the level of engagement (Bedarkar & Pandita, 2014).
Therefore, it is necessary to determine the right measure and intensity of internal
communication that will positively influence employee engagement.
motivated, highly committed and experience positive emotions and good health
(Bakker & Schaufeli, 2014). Engagement is viewed as an emotional and intellectual
commitment to the organization (Baumruk, 2004; Shaw, 2005) as well as an
employee’s involvement, the satisfaction and enthusiasm about their work (Harter,
Schmidt, & Hayes, 2002). According to most definitions, employee engagement
includes both emotions and behaviour, which affects both the affective and cognitive
state of employees. While some authors suggest job characteristics, social support,
reward and punishment system as engagement determinants (Danish, Sidra, &
Farid, 2013; Miles, 2001; Saks, 2006), others argue that engagement is something
intangible that the employee brings to the work (Harter et al., 2002). Therefore, the
concept of employee engagement is mainly based on individual personalities and
perceptions (Bakker, Tims, & Derks, 2012), and unlike organizational commitment,
employee engagement refers to a short-term employee attitude towards the job
(Tkalac Verčič & Pološki Vokić, 2017). Therefore, theory imposes a conclusion that
engaged employees (should) produce better results and the organization will be more
successful. Hypothetically, in that kind of work environment employees (should) feel
more proud, satisfied and happy. So, the last assumption of this study relies on a
question: if positive emotions and well-being is connected to employee engagement
(May, Gilson, & Harter, 2004) and internal communication is identified as a pre-
requisite to employee engagement (Tkalac Verčič & Pološki Vokić, 2017), whether
and to what extent employee engagement affects the relationship between employee
satisfaction with internal communications and their happiness?
Since the purpose of this chapter is to show how ICS relates to employee
happiness through employee engagement as a mediator of this relationship, it’s
important to review all the relationships in the proposed research model (Fig. 1).
Comm.
climate
Corp.
information
Feedback
Horizontal [+]
comm.
Informal
comm.
Media ICS Happiness
quality
Meetings
Superiors
Engagement
Based on the research model (Fig. 1), we propose the following research
questions:
RQ1. Is there a significant relationship between ICS and employee happiness?
RQ2. Is there a significant relationship between ICS and employee engagement?
RQ3. Is there a significant relationship between employee engagement and
employee happiness?
RQ4. Is the relationship between ICS and happiness mediated by employee
engagement?
METHOD
Data Collection
The quantitative data were obtained through an anonymized online survey in
December 2018. The respondents were recruited from 12 international firms who
specialize in the IT and creative industries and have representative offices in
Serbia.
Computer software is one of Serbia’s main export products. Serbia is globally
acclaimed for being the biggest exporter of raspberries, but the value of exported
software and services is almost twice as big as the export of raspberries. For
example, in 2013, the Serbian ICT industry ranked 40th globally when it comes to
value of exported software, while the overall industry was ranked 79th. This
made it one of the most successful and export-oriented industries in Serbia. The
sector’s export position is constantly rising especially when it comes to the export
of computer and information services, i.e., software development. In 2008, the
value of exported services was €96 million and by 2013 it reached as much as
€265 million, a 165% increase. The Serbian IT market was worth around €410
million in 2013. ICT is considered a priority sector for the Government and it will
increase the support for this sector over the years, especially given the sector’s
strong results in attracting investors and employment. Many key global players
such as Microsoft, SKF Group, Adobe, Oracle, Google, Hewlett Packard, SAP,
IBM, Siemens, Intel, Cisco, NCR Corporation, Erickson and others have already
tapped into this potential, either by establishing their development centres in
Serbia or outsourcing services to local IT companies (Development Agency of
Serbia, 2016).
According to the most visited web site for employment in Serbia, job postings
for the IT industry is one of three categories where job ads were most published.
Despite a large number of job postings, only a small number of candidates
apply, so these jobs are considered scarce (Infostud, 2018a). The research on the
labour market in Serbia showed that IT professionals expect the highest salary
when compared to other industries (Infostud, 2018b). These candidates have
high standards for material and nonmaterial benefits and IT companies must
compete and offer the best work conditions in order to keep their employees
happy and satisfied.
80 DANIJELA LALIĆ ET AL.
Measurement
In this study, three constructs were measured: ICS, employee engagement and
happiness.
ICS represents the level of employee satisfaction with different aspects of
internal communication: satisfaction with feedback, satisfaction with commu-
nication with superiors, satisfaction with horizontal communication, satisfac-
tion with informal communication, satisfaction with corporate information,
satisfaction with the communication climate, satisfaction with communication
media and satisfaction with communication during meetings. The Internal
Internal Communication and Employee Engagement 81
Analysis Method
Partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) is used to identify
relationships between constructs, and it is also used for the explanation and
prediction of target constructs. PLS-SEM works well with small sample sizes. To
determine minimum sample size, we followed ‘10 times rule’ (Hair, Hult, Ringle,
& Sarstedt, 2017). The minimum sample size should be 10 times the maximum
number of arrowheads pointing at a latent variable in the model. In our model,
said latent variable is ICS with eight formative arrows indicating that our min-
imum sample size should be 80. Our sample size of 174 exceeds this number. PLS-
SEM can also handle both formative and reflective measures, and is superior to
composite-based SEM when there is a little a priori knowledge of structural
model relationships (Hair et al., 2017).
The Smart PLS 3 software was used in the statistical analysis (Ringle, Wende,
& Becker, 2015). The analysis followed three steps. First, we validated the first-
order measurement model, and secondly, we validated the second-order mea-
surement model. Finally, we tested the structural model. The repeated indicators
approach was used since it produces smaller biases in the estimation of the
higher-order measurement model. Latent variable scores are used while exam-
ining the structural model.
82 DANIJELA LALIĆ ET AL.
RESULTS
Measurement Model
Assessment of First-order Measurement Model
We evaluated the validity of the first-order measurement model by examining
internal consistency, as well as convergent and discriminant validity of all first-
order reflective factors.
The item loadings, Cronbach’s alpha, CR (composite reliability) and AVE
(average variance extracted) values are presented in Table 2. Hair, Black, Babin,
and Anderson (2010) recommend factor loadings ranging from 0.40 to 0.45 for
sample sizes between 150 and 200. All factor loadings are over 0.45 (on average
0.870) which are considered practically significant. We kept all items, because
none of them caused reliability issues. Cronbach’s alpha values were above the
recommended value of 0.700 (Fornell & Larcker, 1981). Composite reliability
varies between 0 and 1, with higher values indicating the higher reliability. All
first-order factors met this criterion of internal consistency.
Table 2. (Continued)
Construct Item Loading a-Value CR AVE
ICS_19_corp_info 0.870
ICS_20_corp_info 0.836
Satisfaction with communication climate 0.932 0.951 0.829
ICS_21_comm_climate 0.884
ICS_22_comm_climate 0.936
ICS_23_comm_climate 0.898
ICS_24_comm_climate 0.921
Satisfaction with communication media 0.946 0.961 0.861
ICS_25_media_qual 0.920
ICS_26_media_qual 0.947
ICS_27_media_qual 0.950
ICS_28_media_qual 0.895
Satisfaction with communication during 0.918 0.942 0.803
meetings
ICS_29_meeting 0.924
ICS_30_meeting 0.929
ICS_31_meeting 0.873
ICS_32_meeting 0.856
Employee engagement
Vigour 0.921 0.950 0.863
ENG_1_v1 0.946
ENG_2_v2 0.940
ENG_5_v3 0.900
Dedication 0.878 0.925 0.803
ENG_3_d1 0.885
ENG_4_d2 0.915
ENG_7_d3 0.889
Absorption 0.780 0.873 0.698
ENG_6_a1 0.743
ENG_8_a2 0.843
ENG_9_a3 0.912
Happiness 0.878 0.883 0.658
HAPPY_1 0.884
HAPPY_2 0.794
HAPPY_3 0.896
HAPPY_4 0.645
1 Satisfaction 0.927
with feedback
2 Satisfaction 0.810 0.866
with
communication
with superiors
3 Satisfaction 0.584 0.623 0.787
with horizontal
communication
4 Satisfaction 0.593 0.591 0.675 0.816
with informal
communication
5 Satisfaction 0.599 0.571 0.665 0.568 0.841
with corporate
information
6 Satisfaction 0.654 0.703 0.787 0.717 0.738 0.910
with
communication
climate
7 Satisfaction 0.612 0.714 0.728 0.683 0.709 0.847 0.927
with
communication
Media
8 Satisfaction 0.669 0.707 0.681 0.720 0.678 0.821 0.829 0.896
with
communication
during meetings
9 Vigour 0.555 0.561 0.477 0.452 0.442 0.448 0.482 0.555 0.928
10 Dedication 0.590 0.672 0.519 0.434 0.451 0.504 0.544 0.596 0.832 0.896
11 Absorption 0.301 0.313 0.447 0.374 0.389 0.381 0.350 0.446 0.602 0.681 0.835
12. Happiness 0.200 0.237 0.256 0.122 0.292 0.154 0.204 0.225 0.545 0.593 0.584 0.811
Notes: Nonsignificant correlations are marked in grey. Square roots of the AVE values are in bold.
This value should be the same or greater than the factor’s highest correlation with
any other construct and all of our first-order factors met the criteria.
first-order dimensions met this criterion (see Table 4). For assessing the higher-
order construct’s reliability and validity, we followed Sarstedt and colleague’s
guidelines (2019). By using indicator loadings and average correlation between
factors (0.870), we manually calculated the relevant statistics for assessing the
higher-order construct’s reliability and validity. These results provide support
for the ICS’s internal consistency reliability, since Cronbach’s a (0.982), Dijkstra-
Henseler’s rho (rA 5 0.977), Jöreskog’s rho (rc 5 0.976) and AVE (0.732) are
above the recommended threshold of 0.708.
The three-step procedure for validating the higher-order formative construct
of employee engagement proposed by Hair et al. (2017) is followed. First, we
assessed the convergent validity by running a redundancy analysis. In this type
of analysis, one or more questions are used as an endogenous single item to
validate the formative measure of employee engagement. Since there is no
global item included in the survey, we used an item that captures the content
domain of the construct, based on its factor loading: ‘At my work, I feel
bursting with energy’. The path factor of 0.901 between formative and reflective
construct exceed of the desired value of 0.80 (Hair et al., 2017), which translates
into an R2 value of 0.81. The convergent validity for higher-order formative
construct employee engagement is established. In the next step, we tested for
potential collinearity issues between lower-order components of employee
engagement. The analysis of measurement model produces the following VIF
(variance inflation factor) values: 3.278 for vigour, 3.992 for dedication and
1.942 for absorption which are lower than a VIF value of five that indicates
collinearity issues. Finally, we assessed the relevance and significance of the
1. ICS
2. Employee engagement 0.659
3. Happiness 0.309 0.761
86 DANIJELA LALIĆ ET AL.
Structural Model
To calculate path coefficients and determine the value of R2, we used the
Consistent Smart PLS algorithm, since reflective second-order factors are present
in the model. To test for statistical significance, the Consistent Bootstrapping
method was employed. The structural model is presented in Fig. 2.
Smart PLS offers SRMR value in order to evaluate the model’s goodness-of-
fit. The SRMR for our structural model was 0.073 which is below the recom-
mended threshold of 0.08. We checked the structural model for collinearity issues
by examining the VIF values of all predictors in the structural model. We found
that both ICS (VIF 5 1.000) and employee engagement (VIF 5 1.726) showed
no collinearity issues in the structural model since their VIF values are below the
conservative threshold of 3.
The R2 values of endogenous latent variables employee engagement (0.421)
and happiness (0.523) can be considered moderate. To obtain the effect sizes, we
examined the f 2 values for all combinations of endogenous constructs. ICS has a
Internal Communication and Employee Engagement 87
Q2included 2 Q2excluded
q2 ¼ (1)
1 2 Q2included
Mediation Analysis
To test for mediation, the indirect effect from ICS to happiness through employee
engagement is examined. It is a product of the path coefficient from ICS to
employee engagement and path coefficient from employee engagement to
happiness. We found that the mean value (0.555) for indirect effect is significant
(t 5 9.081; p , 0.01). Since both the direct effect between ICS and happiness and
indirect effect between ICS on happiness through employee engagement is sig-
nificant, we conclude that employee engagement partially mediates the ICS to
happiness relationship. In order to determine the type of mediation, we followed
the procedure presented by Zhao, Lynch, and Chen (2010). Since the direct effect
between ICS and happiness is negative and the indirect effect is positive, we
conclude that employee engagement represents complementary mediation of the
relationship from ICS to happiness.
88 DANIJELA LALIĆ ET AL.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
This research is supported by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technological
Development of the Republic of Serbia, Grant no. 47028.
REFERENCES
Bakker, A. B., Albrecht, S. L., & Leiter, M. P. (2011). Key questions regarding work engagement.
European Journal of Work & Organizational Psychology, 20(1), 4–28.
Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2008). Towards a model of work engagement. Career Development
International, 13(3), 209–223.
Bakker, A. B., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2014). Work engagement. In P. C. Flood & Y. Freeney (Eds.),
Organizational behaviour volume of the Blackwell encyclopedia of management. West Sussex:
John Wiley & Sons.
Bakker, A. B., Tims, M., & Derks, D. (2012). Proactive personality and job performance: The role of
job crafting and work engagement. Human Relations, 65(10), 1359–1378.
Barrena-Martı́nez, J., López-Fernández, M., & Romero-Fernández, P. M. (2017). Socially responsible
human resource policies and practices: Academic and professional validation. European
Research on Management and Business Economics, 23(1), 55–61.
Baumruk, R. (2004). The missing link: The role of employee engagement in business success.
Workspan, 47(1), 48–52.
90 DANIJELA LALIĆ ET AL.
Bedarkar, M., & Pandita, D. (2014). A study on the drivers of employee engagement impacting
employee performance. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 133, 106–115.
Brodie, R., Hollebeek, D., Juric, B., & Ilic, A. (2011). Customer engagement: Conceptual domain, funda-
mental propositions, and implications for research. Journal of Service Research, 14(3), 252–271.
Caesens, G., Stinglhamber, F., & Luypaert, G. (2014). The impact of work engagement and worka-
holism on well-being – The role of work-related social support. Career Development Interna-
tional, 19(7), 813–835.
Danish, R. Q., Sidra, R., & Farid, A. (2013). Effect of perceived organizational support and work
environment on organizational commitment – Mediating role of selfmonitoring. Advances in
Economics and Business, 1(4), 312–317.
Development Agency of Serbia. (2016). Serbia’s ICT industry putting the ICT into perspective.
Retrieved from https://ras.gov.rs/uploads/2016/02/ict-industry-in-serbia.pdf. Accessed on April
3, 2019.
Downs, C. W., & Adrian, A. (2004). Assessing organizational communication: Strategic communication
audits. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
Fearon, C., McLaughlin, H., & Morris, L. (2013). Conceptualising work engagement – An individual,
collective and organizational efficacy perspective. European Journal of Training and Develop-
ment, 37(3), 244–256.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable vari-
ables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.
Gruman, J. A., & Saks, A. M. (2011). Performance management and employee engagement. Human
Resource Management Review, 21(2), 123–136.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis. Upper
Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares
structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.
Harter, J. K., Schmidt, F. L., & Hayes, T. L. (2002). Business-unit level relationship between employee
satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied
Psychology, 87(2), 268–279.
Infostud. (2018a). Veliki porast broja oglasa – najtraženiji trgovci, IT stručnjaci i mašinci. [A large
increase in the number of job postings, the most wanted are: Retail workers, IT experts and
machine engineers.]. Retrieved from https://poslovi.infostud.com/za-medije/Veliki-porast-
broja-oglasa-najtrazeniji-trgovci-IT-strucnjaci-i-masinci/50017. Accessed on April 3, 2019.
Infostud. (2018b). Istraživanje: Najpoželjniji poslodavac. [Research survey: The most desirable employer.].
Retrieved from https://poslovi.infostud.com/docs/istrazivanje-najpozeljniji-poslodavac-promo-
izvestaj.pdf. Accessed on April 3, 2019.
Isfahani, A. N., Yarali, M., & Ali Kazemi, A. (2012). Analyzing the influence of internal marketing on
employee happiness case study: Nilou Tile Company, Isfahan. International Journal of Aca-
demic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 2(9), 167–178.
Joo, B. K., & Lee, I. (2017). Workplace happiness: Work engagement, career satisfaction, and sub-
jective well-being. Evidence-based HRM: A Global Forum for Empirical Scholarship, 5(2),
206–221.
Karanges, E., Johnston, K., Beatson, A., & Lings, I. (2015). The influence of internal communication
on employee engagement: A pilot study. Public Relations Review, 41(1), 129–131.
Luthans, F., & Avolio, B. J. (2009). The point of positive organizational behavior. Journal of Orga-
nizational Behavior, 30(2), 291–307.
Lyubomirsky, S., & Lepper, H. S. (1999). A measure of subjective happiness: Preliminary reliability
and construct validation. Social Indicators Research, 46(2), 137–155.
MacCormick, J. S., Dery, K., & Kolb, D. G. (2012). Engaged or just connected? Smartphones and
employee engagement. Organizational Dynamics, 41(3), 194–201.
May, D. R., Gilson, R. L., & Harter, L. M. (2004). The psychological conditions of meaningfulness,
safety and availability and the engagement of the human spirit at work. Journal of Occupational
and Organizational Psychology, 77(1), 11–37.
Miles, R. H. (2001). Beyond the age of Dilbert: Accelerating corporate transformations by rapidly
engaging all employees. Organizational Dynamics, 29(4), 313–321.
Internal Communication and Employee Engagement 91
Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Becker, J. M. (2015). SmartPLS 3. Boenningstedt: SmartPLS GmbH.
Retrieved from http://www.smartpls.com. Accessed on April 10, 2019.
Rodrı́guez-Muñoz, A., Sanz-Vergel, A. I., Demerouti, E., & Bakker, A. B. (2014). Engaged at work
and happy at home: A spillover–crossover model. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15(2), 271–283.
Saks, A. M. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of Managerial
Psychology, 21(7), 600–619.
Salanova, M., Agut, S., & Peiro, J. M. (2005). Linking organizational resources and work engagement
to employee performance and customer loyalty: The mediating role of service climate. Journal
of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1217–1227.
Salas-Vallina, A., Alegre, J., & Guerrero, R. F. (2018). Happiness at work in knowledge-intensive
contexts: Opening the research agenda. European Research on Management and Business
Economics, 24, 149–159.
Salas-Vallina, A., López-Cabrales, Á., Alegre, J., & Fernández, R. (2017). On the road to happiness at
work (HAW): Transformational leadership and organizational learning capability as drivers of
HAW in a healthcare context. Personnel Review, 46(2), 314–338.
Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Cheah, J. H., & Becker, J. M. (2019). How to specify, estimate, and validate
higher-order constructs in PLS-SEM. Australasian Marketing Journal, 27(3), 197–211.
Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2003). Utrecht work engagement scale: Preliminary manual. Utrecht:
Occupational Health Psychology Unit, Utrecht University.
Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., Gonzalez-Roma, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of
engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of
Happiness Studies, 3, 71–92.
Shaw, K. (2005). An engagement strategy process for communicators. Strategic Communication
Management, 9(3), 26–29.
Tkalac Verčič, A., & Pološki Vokić, N. (2017). Engaging employees through internal communication.
Public Relations Review, 43(5), 885–893.
Tkalac Verčič, A., Pološki Vokić, N., & Sinčić Ćorić, D. (2009). Razvoj mjernog instrumenta za
procjenu zadovoljstva internom komunikacijom [Development of the internal communication
satisfaction questionnaire.]. Društvena istraživanja: časopis za opća društvena pitanja. [Journal
for General Social Issues.], 18(1–2), 175–202.
Welch, M. (2011). The evolution of the employee engagement concept: Communication implications.
Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 16(4), 328–346.
Zhao, X., Lynch, J. G., Jr., & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths
about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(2), 197–206.