Assignment
Assignment
Assignment
INTRODUCTION
Bangladesh is a developing democratic country of the world .in a democratic society all
citizens have a right to access to justice and get fair trial. The constitution of the people
republic of Bangladesh 1972 has theoretically ensured access to justice, fair trial, rule of law,
fundamental rights, human rights, equality before law, and equal protection of law, but due to
financial crisis and ignorance of law, these constitutional protections have become a fake
promise to the vast majority of the people.
There is a close correlation between peace, justice and prosperity. Improvement of the justice
aspect is essential to facilitate the achievement of prosperity and peace. Effective access to
justice is one of the fundamental conditions for the establishment of rule of law in a society.
Comprehensive justice sector reform requires a dual track strategy which links top-down
institutional reform (supply) and bottom-up access to, arid demand for, better justice
(demand). Such a strategy will bring justice closer to the people. It will help to address the
low trust and inequities that many, in particular the poor, feel define the delivery of justice in
Bangladesh. Since, achieving social justice for all the people of Bangladesh is one of the key
aspirations outlined in the Constitution Bangladesh1 it requires well studied.
1
The Constitution of the People's Republic of Bangladesh (1972).
2
Chambers English Dictionary (Reprinted 1991), p. 7.
1
3
K. J. Aiyer's Judicial Dictionary (12'h Edn.), p. 12.
Page
4
The Free Dictionary at htip://legaldictionary.thefreedictionary.com/access visited on 31.10.2010
Meaning of the term 'Justice':
Generally, the term 'Justice' means the awarding of what is due. 5 The term 'Justice' implies
the virtue by which we give to every man what is his due, opposed to injury or wrong."6
5
Chambers English Dictionary (Reprinted 1991), p. 776.
6
K. J. Aiyer's Judicial Dictionary (12'" Edn.), p. 699.
7
McBride 1988: J. McBride 'Access to justice under international human rights treaties' Parker School Journal
of hast European Law, Vol. 5, 1998 Nos.1-2
8
R. Sudarshan, Rule of law and access to justice: Perspectives from UNDP experience, UNDP Oslo
Governance Centre accessed 30.06.04 at http://www.undp.org/oslocentre/access.htm.
9
M. Zamboni, "Rechtsstaat": Just what is being exported by Swedish development assistance organization?',
2
Page
Law, Social Justice and Global Development Journal (an electronic law journal), accessed 30.06.U4 at
http://elj.warwick.ac.uk/global/issue/2001 -2/zamboni.
of one's rights). It refers not only to the courts, but also to civil and administrative processes
such as immigration review or state compensation funds.
The term 'Access to Justice' demands explanation in order to cope with the present scenario
of Bangladesh. It means access by people, in particular from poor and disadvantaged groups,
to fair, effective and accountable mechanisms for the protection of rights, control of abuse of
power and resolution of conflicts. This includes the ability of people to seek and obtain a
remedy through formal and informal justice systems, and the ability to seek and exercise
influence on law-making and law-implementing processes and institutions. 10 The term 'access
to justice' is most commonly used in reference to the various mechanisms by which an
individual may seek legal assistance. In 1994, the Commonwealth Government appointed the
Access to Justice Advisory Committee. That Committee stated that the concept of 'access to
justice' involves three key elements:
1. Equality of access to legal services - ensuring that all persons, regardless of means, have
access to high quality legal services or effective dispute resolution mechanisms necessary
to protect their rights and interests.
2. National equality - ensuring that all persons enjoy, as nearly as possible, equal access to
legal services and to legal service markets that operate consistently within the dictates of
competition policy.
3. Equality before the law - ensuring that all persons, regardless of race, ethnic
origins, gender or disability, are entitled to equal opportunities in such fields as education,
employment, use of community facilities and access to senders.11
Thus, the focus of this Committee was the goal of equal opportunity to participate in the
formal justice system, both in terms of access to legal service and access to courts and
tribunals. To achieve this goal, the matters targeted for particular attention included the
funding and allocation of legal aid, the costs of legal services and legal proceedings, and
the public availability of legal information.
However, a broad interpretation of the terms 'access to justice' will yield a number of
possible perspectives on 'access to justice' that go beyond the focus on access to legal
services. These include-
1. The equal ability of all in society to access the processes to enforce existing rights or laws
(This perspective assumes that the rule of law provides an effective vehicle to achieving
10
Partly based on Bedner (2004), 'Towards Meaningful Rule of Law-Research: An Elementary Approach', MS
3
Page
Unpublished, VVI, Leiden; and UNDP (n.d.), 'Access to Justice Practitioner Guide'.
11
Access to Justice Advisory Committee, Access to Justice: An action plan, AGPS, Canberra, 1994, p.xxx.
just or fair outcomes. Accordingly, such a perspective indeed concentrates on equitable
access to adjudication, conflict resolution institutions and intermediaries and legal
remedies;
2. The existence of widely accepted rights under international and regional laws that may not
be protected through the domestic justice system;12
3. Equal access for all minority groups to all legal rights enjoyed by the majority (This
approach would not accept differential laws applying to, for example, asylum seekers vis-
a-vis citizens, or homosexuals vis-a-vis heterosexuals.); and
4. The relative underdevelopment of the common law in areas associated with poverty law,
due to the lack of access to litigation opportunities.
Chapter 2
ACCESS TO JUSTICE IN BANGLADESH: REALITY
4
Page
12
For example, the application of ratified international conventions.
Rule of law is meaningless unless there is access to justice for the common people. The
judiciary must be accessible to all if rights are to be enforced. It is not sufficient that there
exists a system of independent judiciary, the cost of having recourse to the courts and
tribunals must be such that there is real access to the courts and tribunals. There may be set of
laws defining the rights of the people, but if the common people cannot seek enforcement of
those rights, those rights merely embellish the papers on which they are described and have
no significance in real life.13
The rich and powerful can always have their ways but it is the poor and weak who
need the support of the law. Having regard to the social and economic situation of the
common people, the cost of litigation in Bangladesh is high and is mounting and most people
cannot afford to seek remedies in courts.14
13
Mahmudul Islam, Constitution Law of Bangladesh (2003) p.63
14
Ibid.
15
The Constitution of the Peoples Republic of Bangladesh. It was enacted on 04 November. 1972 and came
into force on 16 December, 1972.
16
Md.Asadujaman, Access to Justice and Legal Aid in Bangaladesh, p.2, vide
5
Page
http://www.academia.edu/1526562.
In Bangladesh, the police are generally corrupt and their investigation is faulty. Most of the
criminal cases do not get strong foundation because of the weak investigation carried out by
the police. The attorney system in Bangladesh is also inefficient and corrupt.
The state attorneys17 are appointed on political consideration. The party in power appoints
those lawyers as state attorneys, who are affiliated with their party. They are changed with
the change of the government. Because of the transitory nature of attorney service they are
inefficient and not committed to preserve the interest of the community.
While the innocent are languishing inside jail for the lack of legal aid, the criminals are
enjoying freedom by influencing the criminal justice system. The criminal justice system
today is a big business and affects large numbers of people. The criminal justice system is
linked with key socio-political objectives, such as the maintenance of law and order and
preservation of the peace, the security of the individual and the protection of property; and,
increasingly the protection of human rights and individual freedoms. The Bangladesh penal
code is drafted in accordance with colonial British law, which contains many conflicting and
competing policies when applied to present-day situations. The paradox of that law is that it
insists on the application of force and the violent deprivation of liberty, consistent with the
British colonial perspective, in the name of limiting force and fraud and defending liberty.
The police are essential part of the criminal justice system in Bangladesh. The police play a
very important and vital role for the implementation of fair trials. The Bangladesh
government is trying to fix the agenda for democratic policing by transforming the police
force into a police service with the help of UNDP. The prison system has become a
vital component of suppression and brutality, even though prison should be a place for
rehabilitation and correction. Simply put, justice is detained behind the walls of these
Bangladeshi prisons. Prison reform is a necessary objective to ensure people's rights and
"humanize" Bangladesh. Prisoners' rights have become an important item on the agenda for
prison reforms. Lawmakers should introduce a bill to humanize the prison a stem in
Bangladesh, where the main philosophy of prison systems is based on colonial law.18
Chapter 3
Barriers to Access to Justice
17
They are-Attorney General, Additional Attorney General, Deputy Attorney General, Assistant Attorney
General, Public Prosecutor, Assistant Public Prosecutor, Government Pleader and Assistant Government
6
Pleader.
Page
18
The Penal Code, 1860 (Act No.XLV of 1860).
Several factors act as the impediments to Access to Justice. UNDP "Access to Justice:
Practical Note19 has identified following barriers by which the justice system is frequently
weakened:
Delays, prohibitive costs of using the system, lack of available and affordable legal
representation, which is reliable and has integrity, abuse of authority and powers,
resulting in unlawful searches, seizures, detention and imprisonment. Weak
enforcement of laws and implementation of orders and decrees.
Severe limitations in existing remedies provided either by law or in practice. Most legal
systems fail to provide remedies that are preventive, timely, adequate, non-
discriminatory, just and deterrent.
Inadequacies of existing laws to effectively protect women, children, poor and
other disadvantaged people, and gender bias and other barriers in the law and the legal
system.
Lack of de facto protection, especially for women, children, and men in prisons or
centers of detention.
Lack of adequate information about what is supposed to exist under the law, what
prevails in practice, and limited popular knowledge or rights.
Lack of adequate legal aid systems.
Limited public participation in reform programmes.
Excessive number of laws.
Formalistic and expensive legal procedures.20
Barriers related to having low literacy skills.
Barriers faced by people who have disabilities.
Avoidance of the legal system due to economic reasons, fear, or a sense of futility of
purpose.
Many of the barriers are relevant to all disadvantaged groups in the community. These
include the high cost of legal services, inadequate funding for legal aid service providers,
restrictive funding policy for legal aid, restrictive legal aid eligibility guidelines, poor
coordination of legal aid services in Bangladesh
19
Law and Justice Institution- Access to Justice for the poor (Practitioners Guide) Developed by UNDP in
2005. http://web.worldbank.org/Website /External/Topics/EXTLawJustinst.
7
20
In criminal and civil litigation and in administrative board procedures.
Page
Action Needed:
UNDP in Bangladesh is committed to using human rights-based approach in its
programming, guided by international human rights standards and principles. In its opinion, a
human rights-based approach is useful to-
a) focus the problem on the immediate causes impeding access;21
b) define who is most affected;22
c) define who is accountable for addressing the problem;23 and
d) focus capacity development strategies on the specific capacities relevant actors need to
solve the problem.
Access to justice is, therefore, much more than improving an individual's access to courts, or
guaranteeing legal representation. It must be defined in terms of ensuring that legal and
judicial outcomes are just and equitable. According to a human rights-based approach to
development, it is important to identify the grievance that calls for a remedy or redress. A
grievance is defined as a gross injury or loss that constitutes a violation of a country's civil or
criminal law, or international human rights standards.
The capacity and actions needed to achieve access to justice, following a human rights-based
approach, are outlined below:
Legal protection:
Provision of legal standing in formal or traditional law, or both, involves the development of
capacities to ensure that disadvantaged people's rights are recognized within the scope of
justice systems, thus giving entitlement to remedies either through formal or traditional
mechanisms. Legal protection determines the legal basis for all other support areas on access
to justice. Legal protection of disadvantaged groups can be enhanced through: (a) treaty
ratification and their implementation in the domestic law, (b) constitutional law, (c) national
legislation, (d) implementing rules and regulations and administrative orders, and (e)
traditional and customary law. While implementing, following authorities can play the key
role-
21
Lack of safeguards to access or insufficient performance of them.
22
The poor and other disadvantaged people.
23
8
Legal awareness:
Development of capacities so that disadvantaged people know it is possible to seek redress
through the justice system, whom to demand it from, and how to start a formal or traditional
justice process.
Enforcement of rights is dependent on both an awareness that those rights exist and
knowledge of avenues for redress. Lack of legal awareness is a serious impediment to
accessing justice, in particular for the poor who are less likely to be familiar with their rights
and less likely to use the formal system.
Partnerships:
Linking judges, prosecutors and police with community groups can enhance community legal
awareness, increase public trust in the state and improve the capacity of the legal apparatus to
respond to the needs of the poor. Community-based legal aid posts and paralegals are
effective mechanisms for delivering legal information at the grassroots level.
Following authorities can play important role in building legal awareness
1. Ministry of Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs,
2. Ministry of Education,
3. Schools, colleges and universities,
9
24
Constitutionally known as ‘House of the Nation’ (vide Art.65 of the Bangladesh Constitution).
5. Quasi judicial bodies,25
6. Local government bodies,
7. Non-governmental institutional,26
8. Labour unions.
Adjudication:
Development of capacities to determine the most adequate type of redresses or compensation.
Means of adjudication can be regulated by formal law, as in the case of courts and other
quasi-judicial and administrative bodes, or by traditional legal systems. While doing these
acts following authorities can play the key role-
1. Courts.
2. National human rights institutions.28
3. Alternative dispute resolution mechanisms: these can be attached to the court system, or
be administrative bodies.29
25
Human Rights, anti-corruption, and electoral commissions.
26
Example: NGOs, Bar Associations, Universities, communities, etc.
10
2727
Example: to deal with court fees.
28
Human Rights Commission and Ombudsman.
Page
29
Such as land and labour boards.
4. Traditional and indigenous ADR.
Enforcement:
Development of capacities for enforcing orders and decisions is emerging from formal or
traditional adjudication. As regards enforcement, the following can play the key role-
1. Prosecution,
2. Formal institutions,30
3. Administrative enforcement,
4. Civil society and parliamentary oversight,
5. Development of watchdog and monitoring capacities of civil society, so that it can
strengthen overall accountability within the justice system,
6. NGOs working on monitoring and advocacy,
7. Media,
8. Parliamentary select and permanent committees.
30
Police and prisons.
Page
1. Lack of coordination among institutions to ensure optimum use of existing
resources for access to justice, despite available normative frameworks and
institutional resources.
2. Failure of public institutions to adopt a human rights approach in the administration of
justice, in particular when handling cases such as domestic violence and trafficking
crimes that have been traditionally ignored, and inadequately funding for
supporting victims of domestic violence and trafficking.
3. The normative framework that addresses respect for international human rights is
drafted in such a general manner that it creates confusion with regard to what means
are available to seek redress against actions (or inactions) that violate human rights.
4. Deficiencies in the Law on Administrative Justice that lead to practical problems in an
efficient administrative justice system.
5. Lack of a strategic approach to improve the level of transparency and accountability in
the performance of public officials.31
6. Limited alternatives to judicial adjudication for provision of justice outside
overburdened courts and tribunals.
7. Limited legal awareness and education among the general population, which
is a prerequisite for the increased confidence of the citizens in seeking formal
redress for injustices.
8. Insufficiently resourced legal aid system.
9. Unchanged procedural laws, such as the civil procedures that undermine efforts to
respond to a fast evolving social and economic environment, excessive duration of
judicial proceedings and an antiquated manual case management
system.
10. Lack of mapping and collection of relevant jurisprudence.
11. High number of unexecuted decisions of courts and tribunals.
12. Upcoming challenges with the establishment of new justice institutions, such as
juvenile justice mechanisms required by law.
13. Weak civil society engagement and oversight over the performance of the justice
systems and its actors.
14. Gender, ethnicity, and age-based barriers in the legal system and in society at large
that effectively fail to protect women, minority communities, displaced and returned
12
31
It includes judicial officials, both local and international, during performance of their official duties.
15. Court liaison offices are not fully operationalized.
Chapter 3
CONCLUSIONS
The right of access to justice demands that, judicial organs should be open to all whose rights
have been affected. It has been argued that, for rule of law to have any meaning at all, there
should be an independent judiciary to guarantee that each and every person or institution is
13
Another sector in the field of assistance for ensuring equal access to justice is Village Court.
Page
32
New Age (A daily newspaper) 29 November, 2012.
Village courts are playing important roll to provide equal access to justice and also speedy
remedy.
Negative:
Though there are many laws an organizations in our country, which are talking about equal
access to justice to all citizen of country but practically not all laws are enforcing to provide
equal access to justice and not all organizations are active to help disadvantaged peoples.
Our land laws aimed to say that any person appearing before a court has the right not to be
discriminated against, either in the course of the proceedings or in the way the law is applied
to the person concerned. Further, whether individuals are suspected of a minor offence or a
serious crime, the rights to a fair trial have to be equally secured to everyone.
Recommendations: The right to the effective enforcement of the judgment of a court means
that, however complex the case and whatever the difficulties in resolving it, the court must
use all objectively feasible and appropriate means to ensure its enjoyment.
In societies emerging from conflict, large segments of the population may not have had
access justice. Equal access involves extending the reach of formal rule of law institutions to
the population by removing barriers to their use. Strengthening access also involves engaging
the informal sector to enhance its reach, effectiveness, and compliance with human rights
standards.
In a society recovering from violent conflict, several barriers to justice—financial,
geographic, linguistic, logistical, or gender-specific—are present. Improving access is not just
about more courtrooms or more staff. It is also about quality of justice. Justice systems that
are remote, unaffordable, slow, or incomprehensible to the public effectively deny legal
protection. Increase the quantity and quality of justice administration to address these
problems. Better prepared defense attorneys, more citizen-oriented court staff, more
reasonable hours, better information about the justice system are all means for improving
quality. The justice system should be linguistically accessible with local language
proceedings or provision of interpretation.
As regards the problems in relation to gap between law and practice, ideals and actual, it has
already been stated that problems in Bangladesh are many, intractable in some, but not
insurmountable. And in order to meet the aspirations and demands of present day for the
maximum good of the Bangladesh legal system, it has now become an extreme necessity to
15
initiate some new measures. And finally besides existing laws, the ways by which the judicial
Page
system in Bangladesh can be strengthened and the gap between legal expectation and legal
achievements can be bridged are also through initiating following vital measures:
There is lack of coordination among institutions to ensure optimum use of existing
resources for access to justice, despite available normative frameworks and
institutional resources. In this regard, a coordination
body may be established to oversee and implement the access to justice agenda.
There is failure of public institutions to adopt a human rights approach in the
administration of justice, in particular when handling cases such as domestic
violence and trafficking crimes that have been traditionally ignored.
Unchanged procedural laws, such as the civil procedures that undermine efforts to
respond to a fast evolving social and economic environment, excessive duration of
judicial proceeding and an antiquated manual case management system should be
changed. In this regard the recommendation is that the judicial procedure should be
simple and judges should have effective power to override technicalities. If any
technically stands in the way of justice a judge should have the authority to set aside
the same. He must aim at giving justice to the party and that also in a speedy and
efficient manner.
As regards delay in administering justice, the formidable criticism against the
existing common law judicial system is that its procedure is dilatory and expensive,
the legitimacy of which cannot be denied. But it is, however, to be admitted that
certain minimum procedural rules of 'due process' according to American terms, or of
'natural justice' according to English phrase are to be observed if the judges are to
render justice according to law. The use or abuse of procedural delay, however,
depends upon how the Bench and the Bar behave. An earnest desire on the part of
both with an understanding will surely curtail procedural delay. All the blame of delay
cannot be laid at the door of procedure or the lawyers. In our country the
inadequacy of the number of judges is the chief cause of accumulation of cases and
delay in their disposal. However, this dismal condition in the administration of justice
may be improved by quick fulfillment of various recommendations of the past
and present Law Commissions constituted time to time.
There is lack of a strategic approach to improve the level of transparency and
16
33
Dr, Hamiduddin Khan, Law and life of the Society, Bangladesh Perspective,p.23.
Civil society’s engagement and oversight over the performance of the justice system
and its actors is too weak. In this regard, the Government should support robust civil
society and media to oversight of the administration of justice.
There are gender, ethnicity and age based barriers in the legal system. The existing
measures to protect women, minority communities, displaced and returned persons,
and children and youth are inadequate. In this regard, the Government should
implement specific measures to remove obstacles to access to justice for women,
minority communities, and displaced or returned persons.
Despite having mandates of the Constitution as well as Act of the Parliament, there is
no Ombudsman in Bangladesh. In this regard, the government should enforce the
Ombudsman Act, 1980 to appoint Ombudsman for ensuring easy access to justice
against administrative faults.
There is unsatisfactory level of professionalism among lawyers in judicial
proceedings. Any failure or miscarriage of justice due to negligence of the law
officers or lawyers may lead the result disastrous. Therefore, it is expected that in
discharging professional responsibilities, law officers and lawyers should be more
careful and must follow the professional code of ethics. As regards legal aid to the
poor litigants, lawyers' individual efforts may be geared up so as to meet the need of
the present day.
However, Bar Association may take more responsibility to safeguard the integrity of
legal profession. On the other hand, we need a framework of constant monitoring and
supervising the performance of the clerks, peons, peshakars, shcrestadars and judicial
officers of the lower courts to avoid irregularities in the court process. Finally, the
salary and other facilities of the personnel of the courts should be increased so that
they can enjoy better living conditions.
The traditional Shnlish system is sometimes quite ineffective and being abused. In this
regard, informal justice system should have been promoted with novel attire, based on
human rights principles, under the control of a supervisory body.
The courts and Tribunals in Bangladesh could not function smoothly and
uninterruptedly because of the restrictions imposed on their jurisdiction by the 1975
Martial Law Regime (1975-1979) as well as 1982 Martial Law Regime (1982 - 1986).
18
Recommended Readings:
'Access to Justice for Indigenous Peoples in Bangladesh' (A case study prepared by R.D. Roy,
S. Hossain and Dr. M. Guhathakurta). This publication was supported by UNDP Regional
Indigenous Peoples' Programme (RIPP).
Access to Justice Advisory Committee, Access to Justice: An action plan, AGPS, Canberra,
1994.
Access to justice round-table discussion, Parktonian hotel, Jhannesburg, 22 July 2003.
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, The definition and prevalence of physical
disability in Australia, Canberra, 2000.
Borhan Uddin Khan, Fifty Years of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1998).
Advocate Sk. Shamsur Rahman, Bribe Explosion and Our Law Relating to Bribe, published
in the Dhaka Law Report Journal, July 1985.
Chambers English Dictionary (Reprinted 1991).
Dr. Mizanur Rahman, Human Rights and Empowerment (2001).
Economic Commission for Europe Task Force on Access to Justice, Third Meeting, Geneva,
14 October -15 October 2009.
Advocate Nairn Ahmed, Factors and Pressures Influencing Proceedings of Civil Litigation in
Bangladesh: Problems and Proposed Measures, published in the 'FOCUS' (a journal of legal
studies), Vol. 1, 1993.
Tatjana Haque, L. Karen Casper, Jahan Turello Dan and Riffat, 2002, In search of Justice:
Women's Encounters with Alternate Dispute Resolution, Dhaka, The Asia Foundation.
Lena Hasle, Too poor for Rights? Access to Justice for Poor Women in Bangladesh: A Case
19