Balanced Scorecard
Balanced Scorecard
Balanced Scorecard
Strategic-Based Control
Introduction
© 2019to Cost management
Cengage. All rights reserved.
ACTIVITY-BASED Management
Introduction
© 2019to Cost management
Cengage. All rights reserved.
ACTIVITY-BASED VERSUS STRATEGIC-
BASED RESPONSIBILITY ACCOUNTING
• Activity-based system
– Adds a process perspective to the financial perspective
of the functional-based responsibility accounting system
• Strategic-based responsibility accounting system
– Translates the strategy of an organization into
operational objectives and measures
– Takes the form of a Balanced Scorecard
▪ Balanced Scorecard: Identifies objectives and measures
for financial, customer, process, and learning and growth
perspectives
Introduction
© 2019to Cost management
Cengage. All rights reserved.
Elements of RESPONSIBILITY
ACCOUNTING Model
• Assigning responsibility
• Establishing performance measures or benchmarks
• Evaluating performance
• Assigning rewards
Introduction
© 2019to Cost management
Cengage. All rights reserved.
EXHIBIT 1 - responsibility
assignments compared
Introduction
© 2019to Cost management
Cengage. All rights reserved.
EXHIBIT 3 - Performance Evaluation
Compared
Activity-Based Performance Strategic-Based Performance
Evaluation Evaluation
1. Time reductions 1. Time reductions
2. Quality improvements 2. Quality improvements
3. Cost reductions 3. Cost reductions
4. Trend measurements 4. Trend measurements
5. Expanded set of metrics
6. Stretch targets for all four
perspectives
Introduction
© 2019to Cost management
Cengage. All rights reserved.
EXHIBIT 4 - rewards compared
Introduction
© 2019to Cost management
Cengage. All rights reserved.
EXHIBIT 13.5 - Strategy Translation
Process
Introduction
© 2019to Cost management
Cengage. All rights reserved.
EXHIBIT 6 - Summary of Objectives and
Measures: Financial Perspective
Objectives Measures
Revenue Growth:
Increase the number of new products Percentage of revenues from new products
Create new applications Percentage of revenues from new
applications
Develop new customers and markets Percentage of revenues from new sources
Adopt a new pricing strategy Product and customer profitability
Cost Reduction:
Reduce unit product cost Unit product cost
Reduce unit customer cost Unit customer cost
Reduce distribution channel cost Cost per distribution channel
Asset Utilization:
Improve asset utilization Return on investment
Economic value added
Introduction
© 2019to Cost management
Cengage. All rights reserved.
Customer Perspective (2 of 2)
Introduction
© 2019to Cost management
Cengage. All rights reserved.
EXHIBIT 7 - Summary of Objectives and
Measures: customer Perspective
Objectives Measures
Core:
Increase market share Market share (percentage of market)
Increase customer retention Percentage growth, existing customers
Percentage of repeating customers
Increase customer acquisition Number of new customers
Increase customer satisfaction Ratings from customer surveys
Increase customer profitability Customer profitability
Performance Value:
Decrease price Price
Decrease post-purchase costs Post-purchase costs
Improve product functionality Ratings from customer surveys
Introduction
© 2019to Cost management
Cengage. All rights reserved.
EXHIBIT 8 - Summary of Objectives and
Measures: process Perspective
Objectives Measures
Innovation:
Increase the number of new products Number of new products/total products;
R&D expenses
Increase proprietary products Percentage revenue from proprietary products
Number of patents pending
Decrease product development cycle time Time to market (from start to finish)
Operations:
Increase process quality Quality costs
Output yields
Percentage of defective units
Increase process efficiency Unit cost trends
Output/input(s)
Decrease process time Cycle time and velocity
MCE
Post-Sales Service:
Increase service quality First-pass yields
Increase service efficiency Cost trends
Output/input(s)
Decrease service time Cycle time
Introduction
© 2019to Cost management
Cengage. All rights reserved.
Calculating Cycle Time and Velocity –
Example (1 of 3)
• Assume that a company has the following data for one
of its manufacturing cells:
– Theoretical velocity: 40 units per hour
– Productive minutes available (per year): 1,200,000
– Annual conversion costs: $4,800,000
– Actual velocity: 30 units per hour
• Calculate the actual conversion cost per unit using
actual cycle time and the standard cost per minute
Introduction
© 2019to Cost management
Cengage. All rights reserved.
Calculating Cycle Time and Velocity –
Example (2 of 3)
• Calculate the ideal conversion cost per unit using
theoretical cycle time and the standard cost per minute
– What incentive exists for managers when cycle time
costing is used?
• Solution:
– Actual cycle time = 60 minutes/30 units = 2 minutes per
unit
– Standard cost per minute = $4,800,000/1,200,000 = $4
per minute
– Conversion cost per unit = $4 × 2 = $8 per unit
Introduction
© 2019to Cost management
Cengage. All rights reserved.
Calculating Cycle Time and Velocity –
Example (3 of 3)
– Theoretical cycle time = 60 minutes/40 units = 1.5
minutes per unit
▪ Conversion cost per unit = $4 × 1.5 = $6 per unit
▪ Incentive is to reduce cycle time because it reduces the
cost per unit
Introduction
© 2019to Cost management
Cengage. All rights reserved.
Operational Measures of Responsiveness -
Manufacturing Cycle Efficiency (MCE)
• MCE = Processing time/(Processing time + Move time
+ Inspection time + Waiting time + Other non-value-
added time)
– Processing time - Efficient or ideal time it takes to
convert materials into a finished good
– Other activities and their times are viewed as wasteful
▪ Goal - To reduce time of other activities to zero
Introduction
© 2019to Cost management
Cengage. All rights reserved.
Calculate Manufacturing Cycle Efficiency
(MCE) – Example (1 of 3)
• A company has provided the following information for
one of its products for each hour of production:
– Actual velocity: 100 units (per hour)
– Move time: 20 minutes
– Inspection time: 15 minutes
– Rework time: 10 minutes
• Calculate MCE and comment on its significance
Introduction
© 2019to Cost management
Cengage. All rights reserved.
Calculate Manufacturing Cycle Efficiency
(MCE) – Example (2 of 3)
• What is the theoretical cycle time?
– Calculate MCE using actual and theoretical cycle times
• Solution:
– Process time = 60 minutes − 20 minutes − 15 minutes −
10 minutes = 15 minutes
▪ MCE = Process time/(Process time + Move time +
Inspection time + Rework time)
=15/(15 + 20 + 15 + 10) = 0.25
▪ A value of 0.25 indicates that 75 percent of the
manufacturing cycle is attributable to waste
Introduction
© 2019to Cost management
Cengage. All rights reserved.
Calculate Manufacturing Cycle Efficiency
(MCE) – Example (3 of 3)
– Theoretical cycle time = 15 minutes/100 units = 0.15
minute
▪ Actual cycle time = 60 minutes/100 units = 0.60 (includes
theoretical cycle time plus the waste)
▪ MCE = Theoretical cycle time/Actual cycle time
= 0.15/0.60 = 0.25
Introduction
© 2019to Cost management
Cengage. All rights reserved.
Learning and Growth Perspective
Introduction
© 2019to Cost management
Cengage. All rights reserved.
EXHIBIT 9 - Summary of Objectives and
Measures: learning and growth Perspective
Objectives Measures
Increase employee capabilities Employee satisfaction ratings
Employee turnover percentages
Employee productivity (revenue/employee)
Hours of training
Strategic job coverage ratio (percentage of
critical job requirements filled)
Increase motivation and Suggestions per employee
alignment Suggestions implemented per employee
Increase information systems Percentage of processes with real-time
capabilities feedback capabilities
Percentage of customer-facing employees with
online access to customer and product
Information
Introduction
© 2019to Cost management
Cengage. All rights reserved.
Testable Strategy and Strategic Feedback
(1 of 2)
• Testable strategy: Set of linked objectives aimed at an
overall goal
– Testability is achieved by restating the strategy into a set
of cause-and-effect hypotheses
▪ Hypotheses are expressed by a sequence of if-then
statements
Introduction
© 2019to Cost management
Cengage. All rights reserved.
Testable Strategy and Strategic Feedback
(2 of 2)
• Strategic feedback allows managers to test the
reasonableness of the strategy
– Double-loop feedback: Occurs whenever managers
receive information about:
▪ Effectiveness of strategy implementation
▪ Validity of the assumptions underlying the strategy
– Single-loop feedback: Emphasizes only the
effectiveness of implementation
▪ Actual results deviating from planned results are a signal
to take corrective action
Introduction
© 2019to Cost management
Cengage. All rights reserved.
Strategy map
Introduction
© 2019to Cost management
Cengage. All rights reserved.
Strategy Map – Example (1 of 2)
Introduction
© 2019to Cost management
Cengage. All rights reserved.
Strategy Map – Example (2 of 2)
Introduction
© 2019to Cost management
Cengage. All rights reserved.
Exhibit 13.10 - Strategy Map
Introduction
© 2019to Cost management
Cengage. All rights reserved.