Name of the University

Name of the College

Name of the Program

Title of the program plan

Student’s name

1
Acknowledgements

2
 Abstract

The opioid epidemic in the United States is a challenge which is responsible for colossal

nation-wide damage and requires a holistic approach that incorporates prevention, treatment, and

harm reduction. Current data underlines the gravity of the problem by indicating significant rises

in opioid-related deaths and emergency room visits especially among the most vulnerable groups

such as pregnant women and those aged 25 to 45 years. To deal with the issue in such an

effective way, the proposed framework ILE, which is based on mentorship, evidence-based

approach aligned with crucial competencies in epidemiology, health promotion, policy making,

and community engagement, is introduced. The proposed action plan will include informed and

targeted educational campaigns, increased opportunities to access evidence-based treatments,

naloxone distribution, and community engagement initiatives. Planned on the basis of Social

Ecological Model, behavior change theories, and health equity models, these methods try to

overcome structural obstacles and inequalities and also take into account the multiple needs of

the identified target community.

3
 The current opioid epidemic in the United States encompasses a multi-faceted problem

that has been the focus of public attention due to its devastating consequences at the nationwide

level. As a public health professional actively addressing this problem, findings can attest that

the interfacing of several factors that cause the epidemic's persistence is very complex, the

diversity of the opioid crisis, from extreme prescribing of opioids to the widespread use of illicit

substances requires a holistic and well-thought-out strategy for prevention, treatment, and harm

reduction.

Background

The CDC's latest data show that opioids are involved in most of the drug overdose

deaths, probably 66 % of all cases. Within localities, these figures are nothing but an awful fact.

It reveals a growing trend of drug abuse, with fatalities topping the list (Jalal et al., 2018). The

newly released data reveal that opioid-related fatalities have dramatically increased by 25% in

the past two years. This is a clear indication of the need for a rapid response. Furthermore, the

number of emergency room visits about opioid overdoses has also increased by 30% during that

time. According to Stevens et al. (2017), As for the population groups most susceptible to opioid

abuse and overdose deaths in our community, these are heterogeneous ones but share common

characteristics. The local data analysis has demonstrated that the age group of people between 25

and 54 years, especially those between 25-34, are most vulnerable to opioid-related harms.

However, other socioeconomic factors like unemployment, poverty, and no access to health care

increase the risk level among marginalized communities (Stevens et al., 2017). Moreover, we

have observed an alarming increase in terms of opioid misuse among pregnant women during the

past five years. Namely, opioid use disorder among pregnant women has shown a 40% increase.

Wickramatilake et al. (2017) reiterate that identifying the demographic features of the opioid

4
epidemic population is of utmost importance for the formulation and implementation of targeted

and efficient public health interventions.

Overview of Proposed Individual Learning Experience (ILE)

Above all, the objectives are to explore the components that led to the increase, such as

the use and abuse of prescription medications, unlawful substances, and the social determinants

of health. The Individual Learning Experience (ILE) framework includes a dedicated,

personalized learning approach designed to develop total understanding and skills in combating

the opioid epidemic. The role of mentorship should be emphasized, mentors provide advice and

professional expertise from those who have gone through the same journey, through mentorship,

individuals can get their heads around the issue and receive feedback while at the same time fine-

tuning their skills and knowledge in dealing with the complexities of opioid use disorder.

Practical experience is critical because it is through it that one can test theoretical knowledge in

real-life situations allowing development of hands-on skills that help them interact with the

communities (Shelton et al., 2017). Evidence-based strategies involve exploration and

application of the interventions proven by empirical research. Appraisal of the current evidence,

selecting the interventions with proven outcomes, and adapting these interventions to the specific

community are notable ones.

Description of Selected Competencies

Friis and Sellers (2020) articulate on epidemiology as being made up of investigations of

the existing trends and patterns of opioid abuse and deaths that provide the basis for the planning

and evaluation of programs. Use of epidemiological techniques to analyze data and determine

risk factors whilst evaluate the implementation of interventions is crucial in such an endeavor

(Shelton et al., 2017). Health promotion and disease prevention is essentially about developing

5
programs prevention, in this context, opioid addiction and overdose. This involves appreciating

the socio-cultural factors that affect health behavior and formulating targeted interventions.

These can be reinforced by advocating policies that promote well-being (Hays, 2018; Heinen et

al., 2019). On Policy making as a competency, the objective is to develop policies and programs

that simultaneously target prevention and treatment of the disease, considering the social,

economic, and political factors of the country. Community assessment and engagement are

imperative for determining the needs, resources, and barriers that exist within the community in

order to approach the opioid crisis in a more efficient manner (Kurtz el at., 2018; Shelton et al.,

2017). Aiming to personally engage community stakeholders in collaborative activities to make

specific interventions that are directed at the peculiarities of the community in high priority.

The opioid epidemic action plan covers a range of actions, which are prevention,

treatment, harm reduction, and community engagement. On the side of preventing, this initiative

will be centered on running targeted educational campaigns that are directed towards the high

risk groups (Wold & Mittelmark, 2018). These campaigns will raise awareness regarding opioid

risks and healthy ways of life; besides working closely with healthcare providers to enforce strict

guidelines in terms of the prescription. With regards to the treatment, the program will be aimed

at increase the availability of evidence-based treatment modalities like medication-assisted

treatments (MATs) and counselling services as a priority (Jones et al., 2019). This includes

focusing on the simplification of referral schemes and on the improvement of the cooperation

among healthcare providers so that they can respond to the needs of those in need in a timely

manner.

With respect to injury reduction, it will give precedence to the distribution of naloxone

kits and provide comprehensive training on overdose prevention and response to community

6
members. As such, it involves providing first responders and family members with the required

skills and resources to intervene in overdose scenarios effectively, as well as arranging syringe

exchange programs that can help prevent the spread of infectious diseases among the people who

inject drugs. Community engagement is going to be one of the most important components of the

program (Douglas et al., 2019). This program intend to organize town hall meetings and focus

groups to invite community stakeholders to provide suggestions and support the development

and implementation of opioid prevention initiatives. The development of peer support networks

to continually assist and provide resources to individuals in recovery from opioid addiction is

also going to be taken into account as it will create the sense of community and participation

which is the main driving force for long-term recovery.

The program will be tailored towards the population group of persons who are 25–54

years of age with the special attention to those aged 25–34 years, who are thought to be the most

vulnerable group in our community in terms of opioid-related injuries. This large youth

demographic includes new drug using young people with both sexes, young people, and those

from low socio-demographic groups like the Hispanic and Black populations (Jones et al., 2019).

The fact that the poor are exposed to stress and sometimes opt to take opioids to get rid of their

conditions have scientifically been proven. Studies have revealed a rather significant connection

between poverty and the increasing use of and death from opioids (Jalal et al., 2018; Jones et al.,

2019). In addition, the high density of healthcare services access will be associated with people

using opioids in the absence of proper medical supervision that is, they have higher chance of

addiction and overdose. Unemployment together with poverty are a threat to health as the first

one additionally denies the people of the resources and opportunities to apply for help and

treatment.

7
 Theoretical Framework

The Social Ecological Model

The Social Ecological Model will be the basis for developing and deploying the health

program that will be utilized to curb the opioid epidemic. On the individual side, the

interventions will focus on educating the public about opioid risks, promoting healthy behavior

through educational campaigns, counseling and treatment services access (Stevens et al., 2017).

Ultimately, the community-level interventions will engage with policy changes at both local,

state, and national levels to tackle systemic issues such as the opioid prescribing practices, access

to healthcare, and socioeconomic disparities (Wold & Mittelmark, 2018; Soelberg et al., 2017).

Behavior Change Theories

Using the HBM in intervention strategies, public health programs can personalize their

messages and interventions which will help people to begin to change their beliefs and

perceptions towards opioid use and addiction, and thus make them motivated to take action

(Ajzen, 2020; Jones et al., 2019). The Transtheoretical Model, also known as the Stages of

Change Model, describes the process of behavior change as occurring through a series of stages:

pre-contemplation, contemplation, preparation, action, and maintenance. People who are on the

TTM can be at different stages of their readiness to change their behavior and this understanding

is used to create interventions that are tailored to their needs (Ajzen, 2020). Public health

programs are able to deliver targeted interventions that meet the specific needs of individuals and

their challenges.

Health Equity Frameworks

As noted by Dover and Belon (2019), Equity of health paradigm can be mentioned as one

of the ground principles in a health sector since it is such a particular way of promoting health,

8
well-being and health equality for every person whatsoever no matter the level of their belonging

to certain groups. The implementation of the basic health equity circle should be part of a public

policy health strategy because then the gap between therapy offered and resources to furnish will

be pervasively looked at and resolved in order to avail the services to everyone who may need

them due to opioids hazard.

Addressing health disparities in the strategies of the public health interventions will

surely be based on identification and the removal of those root causes that are structural barriers

and will be essential in the realization of positive outcomes in the opioid epidemic (Jones et al.,

2019; Stevens et al., 2017). By the same token, an integrated community perspective should not

ignore relevant problems raised by people directly affected by the opioid epidemic and those

with lived experience, community leaders, and societal organizations (Stevens et al., 2017;

Soelberg et al., 2017). Models which have the presence of marginal than the perspective of those

most affected and those most directly are not only the responsive but they ends up also having

more social justice.

Conclusion

This coordination of these components into public health interventions will help us to

acknowledge the complexities of opioid use and addiction and respond to the multiple needs of

communities. We are going to be able to design the interventions to the people that will be

arriving from various backgrounds and communities.

9
 Reference

Aytur, S. A., Carlino, S., Bernard, F., West, K., Dobrzycki, V., & Malik, R. (2022). Social‐

ecological theory, substance misuse, adverse childhood experiences, and adolescent

suicidal ideation: Applications for community–academic partnerships. Journal of

community psychology, 50(1), 265-284.

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1002/jcop.22560

Ajzen, I. (2020). The theory of planned behavior: Frequently asked questions. Human Behavior

and Emerging Technologies, 2(4), 314-324. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Icek-

Ajzen/publication/342077056_The_theory_of_planned_behavior_Frequently_asked_ques

tions/links/5fb6609aa6fdcc6cc64a2e53/The-theory-of-planned-behavior-Frequently-

asked-questions.pdf

Dover, D. C., & Belon, A. P. (2019). The health equity measurement framework: a

comprehensive model to measure social inequities in health. International journal for

equity in health, 18(1), 1-

12.https://equityhealthj.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12939-019-0935-0?

report=reader

Douglas, M. D., Willock, R. J., Respress, E., Rollins, L., Tabor, D., Heiman, H. J., ... & Holden,

K. B. (2019). Applying a health equity lens to evaluate and inform policy. Ethnicity &

disease, 29(Suppl 2), 329. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6604770/

Friis, R. H., & Sellers, T. (2020). Epidemiology for public health practice. Jones & Bartlett

Learning.

10
 https://samples.jblearning.com/9781284175431/9781284191127_FMxx_Friis_Secured.p

df

Hays, R. (2018). Including health promotion and illness prevention in medical education: a

progress report. Medical Education, 52(1), 68-77.

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/medu.13389

Heinen, M., van Oostveen, C., Peters, J., Vermeulen, H., & Huis, A. (2019). An integrative

review of leadership competencies and attributes in advanced nursing practice. Journal of

advanced nursing, 75(11), 2378-2392.

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1111/jan.14092

Jones, G. H., Bruera, E., Abdi, S., & Kantarjian, H. M. (2019). The opioid epidemic in the

United States—overview, origins, and potential solutions. Obstetrical & Gynecological

Survey, 74(5), 278-279.

https://journals.lww.com/obgynsurvey/Fulltext/2019/05000/The_Opioid_Epidemic_in_th

e_United_States_Overview,.13.aspx

Jalal, H., Buchanich, J. M., Roberts, M. S., Balmert, L. C., Zhang, K., & Burke, D. S. (2018).

Changing dynamics of the drug overdose epidemic in the United States from 1979

through 2016. Science, 361(6408), eaau1184.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8025225/

Kurtz, D. L. M., Janke, R., Vinek, J., Wells, T., Hutchinson, P., & Froste, A. (2018). Health

sciences cultural safety education in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the United

States: a literature review. International journal of medical education, 9, 271.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6387770/

11
Soelberg, C. D., Brown Jr, R. E., Du Vivier, D., Meyer, J. E., & Ramachandran, B. K. (2017).

The US opioid crisis: current federal and state legal issues. Anesthesia & Analgesia,

125(5), 1675-1681. https://journals.lww.com/anesthesia-analgesia/fulltext/2017/11000/

the_us_opioid_crisis__current_federal_and_state.36.asp

Shelton, R. C., Griffith, D. M., & Kegler, M. C. (2017). The promise of qualitative research to

inform theory to address health equity. Health Education & Behavior, 44(5), 815-819.

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1090198117728548

Stevens, J. P., Wall, M. J., Novack, L., Marshall, J., Hsu, D. J., & Howell, M. D. (2017). The

critical care crisis of opioid overdoses in the United States. Annals of the American

Thoracic Society, 14(12), 1803-1809.

https://www.atsjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1513/AnnalsATS.201701-022OC

Resnick, B., Leider, J. P., & Riegelman, R. (2018). The landscape of US undergraduate public

health education. Public health reports, 133(5), 619-628.

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0033354918784911

Wickramatilake, S., Zur, J., Mulvaney-Day, N., Klimo, M. C. V., Selmi, E., & Harwood, H.

(2017). How states are tackling the opioid crisis. Public Health Reports, 132(2), 171-179.

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0033354916688206

Wold, B., & Mittelmark, M. B. (2018). Health-promotion research over three decades: The

social-ecological model and challenges in implementation of interventions. Scandinavian

journal of public health, 46(20_suppl), 20-26.

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1403494817743893

12
13