S8000169 en
S8000169 en
S8000169 en
Germán W. Rama
J . C . Tedesco
E l t e x t o se t r a n s c r i b e de acuerdo con l a v e r s i ó n i n g l e s a
p u b l i c a d a en e l J u b i l e e number de l a I n t e r n a t i o n a l _ R e v i e w
o f E d u c a t i o n , Unesco I n s t i t u t e o f E d u c a t i o n , Hamburg,
XXV?197§72-3 (ISSN 0020-8566) p a g s . 188-211.
Distr.
RESTRINGIDA
DEALC
F i c h a s 11
mayo 1980
8 30401 1 Originals Español
SEDE DEL PROYECTO
COMISION ECONOMICA PARA AMERICA LATINA
OFICINA BUENOS AIRES
Callao 67 - 4° B
Casilla de Correo 4191
Teléfonos 40-0429 - 0431
Dirección cablegráfica UNATIONS
Buenos Aires - República Argentina
CONTENTS
Chapter Page
Notes 15
Appendix. Indicators of the socio-economic and educational situation
in Latin America
Table 1. Income and urbanization 17
Table 2. Gross enrolment ratios in twenty countries of Latin America 18
Table 3. Incidence of i l l i t e r a c y 19
Table 4. Indication of educational centent 20
Table 5. Participation of women in education 21
Table 6. Occupational levels in nine countries of Latin America,
1960-1970 23
- i-
The Social Structure in Latin America
Obviously, not all the countries in the region shared those elements
to the same extent. The availability of natural resources for export, the
supply of labour, the degree of agreement or disagreement among the dominant
sectorss etc., led to different national conditions. Those different
conditions demand a certain caution when an attempt at generalization is made
for Latin America as a whole. In addition, the different nature of national
experiences has increased notably in the last quarter of the century because
of the different ways in which countries readjusted themselves to the
changes introduced in the centres of international power and the various
approaches which have prevailed in each one of those centres.3/
-1-
casesj resulted in structural modifications of some significance. The
first consequence of this crisis was the need to resort to the internal
supply of manufactured products, especially those for direct consumption.
The process of industrialization thus created used relatively simple and
labour intensive technologies. The urban centres grew rapidly and new
social forces emerged with political weight. In those countries where the
process was stronger, the political oligarchies representing mono-exporting
sectors-were replaced by populist regimes expressing an alliance between
sectors of the industrial bourgeoisie, labour unions and, in some cases,
the armed forces. However, the conditions that made possible that process
of substitutive industrialization within the framework of populist regimes
changed substantially around 1950. On one hand, the prices of exports
-•which had assured remuneration for agricultural sectors without seriously
affecting their interests and, at the same time, provided the financing for
the process of industrialization- decreased significantly in the international
markets. On the other hand, substitutive industrialization had already
passed the first phases of development and was confronted with difficulties,
usually found .in advanced stages, such as the impossibility of further
substitution of consumption goods and the increasing need for capital goods.
Under these conditions, it was indispensable to invest more than what was
usually devoted to the replacement of equipment and machinery in use.
Such additional investment could only be obtained in a dependent capitalist
economy at the expense of the usual investment or by resorting to some
form of external financing. Furthermore, it should be taken into account
that, both in the international situation and in the development of capitalism
there had been some important changes which led the central countries to
increase significantly their pressure on peripheral countries to place
capital and industries in those countries. Economic penetration appeared
basically through investments in industry by means of local subsidiaries of
foreign companies or by partnerships of foreign capital with national
companies. Economic activity concentrated gradually in a few monopolistic
units which incorporated modern technology. The consequences of this
process have already been discussed on many occasions and a general consensus
exists that they played an important role in the inability of industry to
produce employment as fast as the active population expanded.
-2-
in the low level groups there are clear indications-of differentiation between
those working in the modern sectors of the economy and those outside them.
i
Urbanization has also raised the need to ensure certain basic social
services (education, health, etc.) under State administration, and, as such
subject to pressures from the various, social sectors.
However, averages for the region show a homogeneity that is far from
real. Internal dissimilarities continue to be very high in the area of
illiteracy and primary education, much higher than those obtained from data
of secondary and higher education. While some countries have been practically
able to eliminate illiteracy among youth, others still have rates of more
than 40%. Similar differences are noticed in the implementation of compulsory
primary education, which is far from being achieved although it has been a
stated goal since the last century.
-3-
reading and writing is not duly achieved and It is lost in a few years due
to l^ck of rvractice.
Examples of the first cases are those countries which started the
process of elimination of illiteracy in the second half of the last century
(Argentina, Uruguay and Costa Rica) by virtue of needs of national integration
and formal political participation. In more recent times, the same needs
were behind the progress achieved by countries such as Peru or some of the
small nations in the Caribbean, with serious problema of national integration
emerging from ethnic as well as linguistic factors.
At the other end of the spectrum are the countries where the expansion
o f literacy and compulsory education was adjusted to the requirements of
production. In these cases, the rate of expansion has been notoriously
slower than ¿ n the others and it has not been able to change the situation
o f important sectors of the population, mainly those living in rural areas,
which are kept marginal by the economic system.
-5-
sectors have been reduced practically to selfemployment in activities of low
productivity which guarantee, in the best of cases, income for mere subsistence.
SecondarY_Education
-6-
In other words, education became the "weak15 variable of the social system: its
distribution could be democratized without being necessarily followed by similar
processes as regards the distribution of income and power.
Mass education and the emergence of new roles for which secondary school
had to prepare candidates, intensified criticism of this traditional structure.
That criticism achieved general consensus and widespread diffusion. Numerous
projects for reform have been planned in almost all countries of the region,
yet the results achieved by those projects are not proportionate to the level
of criticism 11/.
Two different assumptions were at the root of that criticism. The first, of
a quantitative nature, maintained that industial expansion would produce an
increasing demand for human resources trained at the technical level. The second,
on the other hand, was essentially qualitative and held that a specialized
schooling and training were necessary to accede to new positions in the labour
market.
In view of the rigidity of the traditional structure and the need to ensure
that the new forms of education should not be used as alternative channels to
-7-
college instruction, the new secondary technical education tended to be organized
in many countries outside the existing system and its streams acquired a terminal
character 12/.
However, the assumptions of this strategy were far from being achieved. On
the one .hand, while the creation of technical occupations was intense, it was
below the growth of enrolment. On the other hand, trends in technological
innovation and their effects on job qualification were not uniform. While some
occupations became more complex, others were simplified and what appears clearly
is that there is no relatively strong correlation between occupation and type
of studies 13/.
Higher Education
This framework makes it difficult to point out in a few pages the most
noticeable trends of the university situation. Nevertheless, an attempt will
be made to summarize the essential elements of the problem by three central
hypotheses: the internal segmentation of the college system, the increasing
depreciation of higher education and the deterioration of the academic and
scientific quality of studies. The common link uniting these hypotheses is
given by the fact that they are different answers to the problem of massive
enrolment and all seek to neutralize, in different ways, the de-stabilizing
consequences which massive college enrolment has in the social system.
Global data on the dynamics of the labour market show that the area
which has been most active and most expanding has been that of non-manual jobs.
If the professional and semi-professional categories are considered - the
composition of which includes persons with high educational standards - it is
possible to verify that in the decade 1960-70 they achieved the highest
percentage of increases among all occupational categories 16/. This means
that, for the moment, higher education has been the channel for access to the
sector of the labour market of more relative expansion and better income.
Nevertheless, there are sufficient indications that this situation is
undergoing rapid deterioration. On the one hand it seems unlikely that the
growth achieved in the decade could be maintained. If that were to happen,
there would be cases like Venezuela, for ¿xample, where projecting the increase
recorded up to the present through 1980 and 1990, would bring the professional
and semi-professional category to 15% and 25% of the economically active
population respectively. On the other hand, in view of the increase of
available labour in a market of restricted employment, it is possible to
foresee that income levels for these categories would tend to decrease and to
express important disparities which would make the averages misleading.
-10-
This constant increase frustrates the efforts of wide sectors of the population
which are able to give to their children higher educational levels than those
achieved by their parents. It also maintains, through that process, the
structure of social differentiation of a stratified society.
I t could be held, following this line of argument, that the new contents
of the curriculum appear f i r s t not only at the higher levels of the educational
system, but they are also concentrated in those institutions recruiting
students from given social sectors. As examples of this situation, the
stratification of colleges and the curricular differences emerging from i t
could be mentioned.
-12-
The second element to be considered refers to the fact that massive
enrolment in the university has led to a crisis in its role as the agent for
the preparation and diffusion of the cultural model of Obx,iaaat sjovps cf tl.o
ruling e l i t e . Obviously, this is not an exclusive problem of the university,
It reflects, in fact, the ideological crisis of dominant groups in the last
quarter of a century. This crisis emerges because, once the hegemony of
agro-exporting sectors ended, the new groups could not strengthen their
position, to an extent enabling them to produce cultural models which could
represent them organically.
-14-
Notes
12/ An eloquent indication is the fact that institute« created with the
objective of -training technical personnel of medium level were established under
the ministries of labour and not under the ministries of education.
13/ In the case of the Argentine industrial sector, see Juan C. Tedesco,
Indvs^iali&acionj^ educación en Argentina, DEALC/1, 1S77. Also see J. Hallak
and P. Caillods, Educationtravail_et envploi a Panama* Document de Travail,
HEP/544 , 75', París ri5\€sC0, "19777
15/ A very good example of this process is the case of Colombia. In that
connection seal Germán W. Rama, ''Educación universitaria v movilidad social.
Reclutamiento de elites en Colombia", en EevistaJjajtino^
Buenos Airas, vol. VI, julio 1970. N° 2.
19/ For a iroro detailed discussion of this question' 3oe: German W. Rama;,
Educ-cicn y I'jük.'T'v;::!^ cp. ext.
APPENDIX
-17-
Table 2. Gross Enrolment Ratios in Twenty Countries of Lit in Vü.>vic*.
Argentina 94.1 98.3 98.1 10.4 27.0 50.5 5.2 11.3 28.0
Bolivia 35.0 53.8 92.9 4.9 9.9 18.0 1.6 3.6 5.9
Brasil 39.3 59.7 85,5 5.7 9.5 19.6 0.9 1.5 9.4
Colombia 36.0 54.8 88.5 3.9 10.2 20.1 0.9 1.7 8.4
Costa Rica 61.4 81.9 91.7 5.9 16.2 39.5 1.3 4.8 18.5
Cuba 66.2 94.5 107.0 4.7 12.3 27.4 • • • 3.3 9.0
Chile 74.0 88.7 90.0 10.7 21.5 47.2 1.6 4.0 16.2
Dominican Rep. 53.5 82.0 94.4 1.7 11.6 25.5 0.9 1.5 5.7
Ecuador 56.7 72.6 93.7 4.4 10.6 27.5 1.3 2.6 8.3
El Salvador 61.1 66.7 93.4 2.9 9.6 19.1 0.6 1.1 • • •
Guatemala 27.7 39.9 53.3 2.4 4.8 10.1 0.7 1.6 4.1
Haiti 19.0 30.8 35.2 1.0 3.8b 5.0 b 0.2 0.5 0.5
Honduras 28.1 56.9 73.4 0.6 5.7 11.9 0.6 1.1 4.4
Mexico 53.0 70.1 98.5 2.7 10.0 30.2 1.6 2.6 9.6
Nicaragua 38.5 48.7 71.4 2.7 5.4 19.3 0.7 1.2 6.7
Panama 76.0 80.5 106.9 9.2 25.0 48.4 1.9 4.6 18.3
Paraguay 74.3 84.7 86.4 1.5 9.4 17.7 1.2 2.3 4.8
Peru 66.8 72.5 95.2 6.4 13.5 33.9 2.1 3.6 22.8
Urugicy 89.8 93.8 90.6 17.0 30.5 62.4 5.7 7.7 15.0
Venezuela 51.1 83.5 84.5 3.0 17.7 31.9 1.3 4.3 19.8
a) Courses from 1st to 6th are considered as primary education and from 7th
to 12th as secondary education.
-18-
Table 3. Incidence of I l l i t e r a c y
-19-
Table 4 . Indication of Educational Content
Argentina 71. § 80.6 89.7 25.6 41.1 36.8 20.1 25.8 24.5^/
Bolivia 34.9 34.7 . 53.5 83.4 84.7 87.1 20.2 20.8 15.2
Brazil 13.5 34.3 52.0 73.7 74.8 75.9 18.1 20.5 23.
Colombia 27.4 35.8 64.9 57.6 71.4 80.1 37.4 27.5 25.1
Costa Rica 40.7 79.4 92.6 74.1 92.2 95.9 5.4 7.6 7.6Î/
Cuba 51.9 • • • 83.0 73.4 74.0 77.0 27.9 43.1 39.3-/
Chile 80.2 88.0 101.3 70.9 67.0 63.5 29.3 36.2 30.8
Ecuador 36.3 60.4 51.9 60.0 63.1 84.2 28.7 27.3 17.6*/
El Salvador 30.5 48.5 52.5 60.7 80.9 69.6 29.5 14.3 27.65-/
Guatemala 1
• • 22.6 27.6 81.2 75.0 75.0 26.3 21.8 23.8
Honduras 20.9 40.2 40.8 63.8 73.9 75.8 11.4 24.0 26.4£/
Mexico 37.2 63.7 91.9 54.6 71.7 70.3 32.2 33.9 24.3—/
Nicaragua 17.1 34.3 40.6 60.2 87.9 91.4 29.3 19.8 14.5—/
Panama 66.4 73.0 80.5 68.8 65.0 66.7 25.4 10.5 21.4Î/
Paraguay 32.4 Vf V CK
J 4
• u. O . \J 87.4 oo p 1 Q• Q
J.V V 18.9 21.51/
Peru • • • 65.9 72.6 67.8 81.2 74.3 23.6 16.2 27.5
Dominican
Republic • • • • 35.8 51.9 55.5 95.9 96.3 21.7 14.3 14.8Ì/
Uruguay 68.6 82.9 97.9 65.5 75.8 76.7 8.6 15.0 18.0
Venezuela 46.1 63.7 69.6 58.1 63.9 63.9 . 23.5 23.8 25.9
Source:
1) OREU, UNESCO and Statistical_Yearbook 1976, for data on enrolment.
CELADE, Estimaciones_de_gublaci6n, para datos de población por edad.
2) Prepared on the basis of data from UNESCO, Evolucion y_Situacion_actual
de la_educacion_en_America J^atina, OREU, Ed. Santillana, Santiago, Chile, 1976.
~ 3) Stat1stical^Yearbook~1976, UNESCO.
-21-
Table 6. Occupational levels in nine countries of Latin America, 1960-1970
(Percentage^
, ^ ^ ^ ^ 30, 34.0 2fl 20 , 32.4 31.3 3,4 3,9 3,2 34, 23.7 jg jg ft
H O 6.6 7.5 5.5 7.3 5.2 6.3 6.1 19.0 IU 4.1 5.3 .0.» MU 5.» 6.6 6.7
remunerated «orken is family
m. I* J, 7.1 >9 ,6 9 IS 7 U.4 ,¿0 MS ,7.7 ,0 9 £7 U V 14» 1
remonentod members of the
family wfro worktatervicet OJ 0.6 0.» 1.0
IV. Ufdktm end ktgkk^lt 1.3
3.4of 0.10,1 IJ
tkeprtmary I.I0.3 0.8 1.2 1.00.6 0.2 1.30.«
3r
.4 1.3 0.1 0.1 1.3 1.1 0.5 0.8 1.2 1.0 0.6 0.2 1.3 0.6 0.3 0J 0.9 1.0
•I Employe* of Qw agricultural mete
aad to the eitnctiwe mduitry 19.1
13.1SO.9
14.9
V. Ltm*r Igptb of tilt 40.2 12,6 4.829.9 24.4 18,9 6.1.43,}36.9 Sl.0 48.» O.S 1.4
9Jprimary ttetor
7.8 14.2 11.8 8.3
a) Salaried nasi worfcert 21.7 16.5 10.6 3.9 6.3 6.8 '11.0 9.3 0.4 0.5 <1.6 7.1
b) Self employed workers a»d nun-5.4 5,3 36.7 28.4 4.3 0.9 8.2 7.9 8.3 2.2 37.2 30.1 40.0 39.6 0.1 0.9 21.1 120
remunerated worker» is family
enteipaaaa .. *,
VI. ( M m M M M .h.pmk«n(- 10.6 9.3 4.3 ¡.4 3.6 0.9 3.2 3.7 1.3 0.7 ,2.0 4.7 t.8 S.4 3J 1.8 S.I 0.
M* probably la d» pruaary sector)
TotM ,00,0 ,00.0 100.0 100.0 100,0 100.0 100.0 100,0 100.0 100.0
CWAL. flikmlb««»co ysoc»!,*, «x«m« i.An*icU,H*. Report ofIT* -«Km. Guattmala. 25 April - 51Kay. 1977 I u e ^ ( ¡
I960 aad 1970 «»in tS MOOMl cea»s: &ruil I960, »suit of > Mttaiul cemut; 1972. «iiwys from a population sample of six retkxi. (a nWete may aut
fe "¿»dZi»* lewh Of the primary Costa Rica: 1963 and 1970. sur«y. from a populate «tan «ea,:q.B* 1960 ^
outfoml cJuTtetalkcmtZ Ecuador 1962 and 1968. survey,froma population sample co..rin, urban .re«: Panama. I960 and 1970 . >e»il..fro« aat.o^c^^.r*uay. 962and
JEw-nT* "«JwriSis!TmHtfro» the census. 1970. survey. from a population ample. Only Montevutoo » both c.«,: Veneaoetar I960, census. 197}. «my. from a p
cenaaa la both cases).
-23-
Libro de edición argentina
Impreso en la Oficina de Cepal en Buenos Aires
Callao 67 - 3 o B - Buenos- Aires - Argentina
mayo 1980