CFM Ch13
CFM Ch13
CFM Ch13
◼ Capital Structure
❑ Includes:
◼ Permanent Short-Term Debt
◼ Long-Term Debt
◼ Preferred Stock
◼ Common Equity
Introduction (slide 2 of 3)
◼ Financial Structure
❑ Includes:
◼ Total Current Liabilities
◼ Long-Term Debt
◼ Preferred Stock
◼ Common Equity
Introduction (slide 3 of 3)
16-8
Capital Structure Theory Under
Three Special Cases
◼ Case I – Assumptions
▪ No corporate taxes
▪ No bankruptcy costs
◼ Case II – Assumptions
▪ Corporate taxes
▪ No bankruptcy costs
▪ Bankruptcy costs
16-9
Case I – Propositions I and II
◼ Proposition I
▪ The value of the firm is NOT affected by
changes in the capital structure
▪ The cash flows of the firm do not
change; therefore, value doesn’t change
16-10
Case I – Propositions I and II
◼ Proposition II
▪ The WACC of the firm is NOT affected
by capital structure
16-11
Case I - Equations
◼ WACC = RA = (E/V)RE + (D/V)RD
◼ Ex. (0.8)(15%)+(0.2)(6%)=13.2%
◼ RE = RA + (RA – RD)(D/E)
◼ Ex. 13.2%+(13.2%-6%)(0.2/0.8)=15%
16-14
Business Risk and
Financial Risk
◼ Proposition II: RE = Rf + A(1+D/E)(RM – Rf)
◼ CAPM: RE = Rf + E(RM – Rf)
▪ E = A(1 + D/E)
◼ Therefore, the systematic risk of the stock
depends on:
▪ Systematic risk of the assets, A (Business risk)
▪ Level of leverage, D/E (Financial risk)
16-15
Capital Structure Theory Under
Three Special Cases
◼ Case I – Assumptions
▪ No corporate taxes
▪ No bankruptcy costs
◼ Case II – Assumptions
▪ Corporate taxes
▪ No bankruptcy costs
▪ Bankruptcy costs
16-16
Case II – Cash Flow
16-17
Example: Case II
16-18
Interest Tax Shield
◼ Annual interest tax shield
▪ Tax rate times interest payment
▪ 2,000 in 5% debt = 100 in interest expense
▪ Annual tax shield = 0.4(100) = 40
◼ Present value of annual interest tax shield
▪ Assume perpetual debt for simplicity
▪ PV = I / Kd = 40 / 0.05 = 800
▪ PV = B(Kd)(TC) / Kd = BTC = 2,000(0.4) = 800
16-19
Case II – Proposition I
16-20
Example:
Case II – Proposition I
◼ Data
▪ EBIT = 25 million; Tax rate = 35%; Debt = $75
million; Cost of debt = 9%; Unlevered cost of
capital = 12%
◼ VU = 25(1-0.35) / 0.12 = $135.42 million
◼ VL = 135.42 + 75(0.35) = $161.67 million
◼ E = 161.67 – 75 = $86.67 million
16-21
16-22
Case II – Proposition II
◼ The WACC decreases as D/E increases because
of the government subsidy on interest payments
▪ RA = (E/V)RE + (D/V)(RD)(1-TC)
▪ RE = RU + (RU – RD)(D/E)(1-TC)
◼ Example
▪ EBIT = 25 million; Tax rate = 35%; Debt = $75 million;
Cost of debt = 9%; Unlevered cost of capital = 12%
▪ RE = 12% + (12%-9%)(75 / 86.67)(1-0.35)
= 13.69%
▪ RA = (86.67/161.67)(13.69) + (75/161.67)(9%)(1-0.35)
= 10.05%
16-23
Example:
Case II – Proposition II
◼ Data
▪ EBIT = 25 million; Tax rate = 35%; Debt = $75
▪ No bankruptcy costs
◼ Case II – Assumptions
▪ Corporate taxes
▪ No bankruptcy costs
▪ Bankruptcy costs
16-26
Case III
◼ Now we add bankruptcy costs
◼ As the D/E ratio increases, the probability of
bankruptcy increases
◼ This increased probability will increase the
expected bankruptcy costs
◼ At some point, the additional value of the
interest tax shield will be offset by the
increase in expected bankruptcy cost
◼ At this point, the value of the firm will start to
decrease, and the WACC will start to
increase as more debt is added
16-27
16-28
16-29
Conclusions
16-30
16-31
Managerial Recommendations
◼ The tax benefit is only important if the firm has
a large tax liability
◼ Risk of financial distress
▪ The greater the risk of financial distress, the
less debt will be optimal for the firm
▪ The cost of financial distress varies across
firms and industries, and as a manager you
need to understand the cost for your industry
16-32
16-33
34
Stock Price and Leverage under
Corporate Taxes
◼ If a company announces that, in the near
future, it will issue some of debt to buy
back some of stock.
◼ The stock price moves up on the date of
announcement only.
Capital Structure Theory