Cfap 6 Audit Procedures Fin Reporting

lOMoARcPSD|38463810
CFAP 6 - Audit Procedures (Fin. Reporting)
Audit and Assurance (Institute of Chartered Accountants of Pakistan)
Scan to open on Studocu
Studocu is not sponsored or endorsed by any college or university

Downloaded by Muhammad Nauman Ali ([email protected])
lOMoARcPSD|38463810
CFAP 6
Audit Focus
AUDIT PROCEDURES (REPORTING)

Contents
IFRS 5 – Non-current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations ................................................. 3
Presentation and disclosure of segment information .............................................................................................. 3
Held for sale assets................................................................................................................................................................... 3
Audit procedures ....................................................................................................................................................................... 3
IAS 24 – Related Parties Disclosures .................................................................................................................. 5
Auditor Responsibilities .......................................................................................................................................................... 5
Risks ................................................................................................................................................................................................. 5
IFRS 15 – Revenue from Contracts with Customers .....................................................................................11
Audit procedures for testing IFRS 15 ............................................................................................................................ 11
Audit procedures for contracts in which performance obligations are satisfied over time
('construction contracts') .................................................................................................................................................... 12
IAS 40 – Investment Properties ........................................................................................................................14
Audit evidence ......................................................................................................................................................................... 14
Risk ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 15
IAS 10 and 37 – Contingencies and Commitments with Events after reporting period .......................16
Auditing provisions and contingencies ........................................................................................................................ 16
Procedures regarding litigation and claims ............................................................................................................... 17
Procedures regarding events after the reporting period .................................................................................... 18
IFRS 16 – Leases ...................................................................................................................................................19
Auditing leases......................................................................................................................................................................... 19
IFRS 09, IFRS 07, IAS 32: Financial Instruments ............................................................................................21
Audit issues around fair value .......................................................................................................................................... 21
Risk assessment ....................................................................................................................................................................... 21
Auditing financial instruments .......................................................................................................................................... 24
Auditing derivatives ............................................................................................................................................................... 32
IAS 19 – Employee benefits ...............................................................................................................................34
Auditing Evidence ................................................................................................................................................................... 34
IFRS 2 – Share-based payment .........................................................................................................................36
From the desk of Hasnain R. Badami, ACA (TSB Education) Page 1 of 50

lOMoARcPSD|38463810
CFAP 6
Audit Focus
Audit Evidence ......................................................................................................................................................................... 36
IAS 21 and 29 – Foreign currency translation and hyperinflation .............................................................37
Audit procedures .................................................................................................................................................................... 37
IAS 12 – Income Taxes ........................................................................................................................................38
Audit risks................................................................................................................................................................................... 38
Current tax: audit procedures ........................................................................................................................................... 38
Deferred tax: audit procedures ........................................................................................................................................ 39
Groups: types of investment and business combination .............................................................................40
Planning and risk assessment as group auditor ...................................................................................................... 40
Risk assessment procedures .............................................................................................................................................. 40
Audit procedures .................................................................................................................................................................... 41
The consolidation: audit procedures ............................................................................................................................. 45
Promoting best practice in group audits .................................................................................................................... 48

lOMoARcPSD|38463810
CFAP 6
Audit Focus
IFRS 5 – NON-CURRENT ASSETS HELD FOR SALE AND DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
IFRS 5 – NON-CURRENT ASSETS HELD FOR SALE AND DISCONTINUED

OPERATIONS
PRESENTATION AND DISCLOSURE OF SEGMENT INFORMATION
ISA 501, Audit evidence – Specific Considerations for Selected Items governs the auditor's approach
to auditing segment information.
Auditors are required to obtain sufficient, appropriate audit evidence regarding the presentation
and disclosure of segment information by:
(a) obtaining an understanding of the methods used by management in determining segment
information:
(i) evaluating whether such methods are likely to result in disclosure in accordance with the
applicable financial reporting framework,
(ii) where appropriate, testing the application of such methods; and
(b) performing analytical procedures or other audit procedures appropriate in the circumstances.
(ISA 501.13)
When the ISA talks about obtaining an understanding of management's methods, the following
may be relevant:
 Sales, transfers and charges between segments, elimination of inter-segment amounts
 Comparisons with budgets and other expected results; for example, operating profits as a
percentage of sales
 Allocations of assets and costs
 Consistency with prior periods, and the adequacy of the disclosures with respect to
inconsistencies
It is important to stress that auditors only have a responsibility in relation to the financial
statements taken as a whole. Auditors are not required to express an opinion on the segment
information presented on a standalone basis.
HELD FOR SALE ASSETS

IFRS 5 requires that assets which meet the criteria 'held for sale' are shown at the lower of carrying
amount and fair value less costs to sell, that held for sale assets are classified separately on the
statement of financial position and the results of discontinued operations are presented separately
on the statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income.
AUDIT PROCEDURES
To ensure assets meet the criteria include the following:
 Inquiries/written representations from management concerning intentions
 Reviewing minutes of management for evidence of firm plan to sell

lOMoARcPSD|38463810
CFAP 6
Audit Focus
IFRS 5 – NON-CURRENT ASSETS HELD FOR SALE AND DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
 Ascertaining whether appropriate estate agent appointed (by reviewing contract between the
parties)
 Reviewing sale particulars
 Comparison of sale price per sale particulars to fair value
 Asking estate agent of likelihood of completion within a year

lOMoARcPSD|38463810
CFAP 6
Audit Focus
IAS 24 – RELATED PARTIES DISCLOSURES

ISA 550 provides guidance on the auditor's responsibilities, and audit procedures regarding related parties
and transactions with such parties.
ISA 550 is applicable whether or not IAS 24, Related Party Disclosures is a requirement of the reporting
framework for the entity concerned.
AUDITOR RESPONSIBILITIES
The auditor has a responsibility to perform audit procedures to identify, assess and respond to the
risks of material misstatement arising from the entity's failure to appropriately account for or
disclose related party relationships, transactions or balances.
RISKS
The following audit risks may arise from a failure to identify a related party.
 Failure of the financial statements to comply with IAS 24.
 There may be a misstatement in the financial statements – transactions may be on a non-arm’s
length basis and thus may result in assets, liabilities, profit or loss being overstated or
understated. For example, special tax rates may apply to profits reported on sales to related
parties.
 The reliance on a source of audit evidence may be misjudged. An auditor may rely on what is
perceived to be third-party evidence when in fact it is from a related party. More generally,
reliance on management assurances may be affected if the auditor were made aware of non-
disclosure of a related party.
 The motivations of related parties may be outside normal business motivations and thus may
be misunderstood by the auditor if there is non-disclosure. In the extreme, this may amount
to fraud.
The inherent risk linked to related party transactions (RPT) can be high, especially where
management is unaware of the existence of all the related party relationships or transactions, or
where there is an opportunity for collusion, concealment or manipulation by management. There is
an increased risk that the auditor may fail to detect a RPT, where:
 there has been no charge made for a RPT (ie, a zero cost transaction);
 disclosure would be sensitive for directors or have adverse consequences for the company;
 the company has no formal system for detecting RPTs;
 RPTs are with a party that the auditor could not reasonably expect to know is a related party;
 RPTs from an earlier period have remained as an unsettled balance;
 management have concealed, or failed to disclose fully, related parties or transactions with
such parties; and

lOMoARcPSD|38463810
CFAP 6
Audit Focus
 the corporate structure is complex.
Point to note: The term 'arm's length' continues to be used in the context of IAS 24 even though
it has been removed from the definition of fair value in IFRS 13.
2.1 Risk assessment procedures

In planning the audit, the auditor needs to consider the risk of undisclosed related party
transactions. This is a difficult area because IAS 24 does not have consideration for materiality.
Thus, even small RPTs should be disclosed by a company. Indeed, related party relationships where
there is control (e.g, a subsidiary) need to be disclosed even where there are no transactions with
this party.
The auditor needs to perform the following procedures:

(a) The engagement team shall discuss the risks of fraud-related misstatements. Matters to be
addressed would include the importance of maintaining professional scepticism and
circumstances which may indicate the existence of related party relationships or transactions
that management has not identified.
(b) Make inquiries of management about the identities of related parties and any RPTs. This
includes:
(1) the identity of related parties, including changes from prior period;
(2) the nature of the relationships between the entity and its related parties;
(3) whether any transactions occurred between the parties and, if so;
(4) what controls the entity has to identify, account for and disclose related party relationships
and transactions;
(5) what controls the entity has to authorize and approve significant transactions and
arrangements with related parties; and
(6) what controls the entity has to authorize and approve significant transactions and
arrangements outside the normal course of business.
(c) Obtain an understanding of controls established to identify, account for and disclose RPTs and
to authorize and approve significant transactions with related parties / outside the normal
course of business.
Where controls are ineffective or non-existent, the auditor may be unable to obtain sufficient,
appropriate audit evidence and will need to consider the impact of this on the audit opinion.
The auditor is also required to be alert for related party information when reviewing records or
documents. In particular, the auditor must inspect bank and legal confirmations and minutes of
meetings of the shareholders and those charged with governance. Where these procedures reveal

lOMoARcPSD|38463810
CFAP 6
Audit Focus
significant transactions outside the entity's normal course of business, the auditor must inquire of
management about the nature of these transactions and whether a related party could be involved.
2.2 Responses to the risks of material misstatement

In accordance with ISA 330, the auditor must design and perform further audit procedures to obtain
sufficient, appropriate evidence about the assessed risks of material misstatement. These may
include:
 confirming or discussing the transactions with intermediaries eg, banks, lawyers or agents;
 confirming the purposes, specific terms or amounts of the transaction with the related party;
and
 reading the financial statements of the related party for evidence of the transaction in the
related party's accounting records.
Where the risk of misstatement may be due to fraud additional procedures may apply:
 Inquiries of and discussion with management and those charged with governance
 Inquiries of the related party
 Inspection of significant contracts with the related party
 Background research eg, internet
 Review of employee whistleblowing reports
Identification of previously unidentified or undisclosed related parties or significant related

party transactions
If the auditor identifies related parties or significant related party transactions that management has
not previously identified or disclosed to the auditor, the auditor must do the following:
 Promptly communicate the relevant information to the other members of the engagement
team
 Where the applicable reporting framework establishes related party requirements request
management to identify all transactions with the newly identified related parties and inquire as
to why the entity's controls have failed to identify and disclose the transaction
 Perform appropriate substantive audit procedures These might include making inquiries
regarding the nature of the entity's relationships with the newly identified related party,
conducting an analysis of accounting records for transactions with the newly identified related
party and verifying the terms and conditions of the newly identified related party transaction
 Reconsider the risk that other unidentified related parties or significant related party
transactions may exist
 If the non-disclosure by management appears intentional and therefore indicates possible fraud
evaluate the implications for the rest of the audit
Identified significant related party transactions outside the entity's normal course of business

lOMoARcPSD|38463810
CFAP 6
Audit Focus
Where significant related party transactions outside the entity's normal course of business are
identified, the auditor must do the following:
 Inspect the underlying contracts and agreements and evaluate whether:
– the business rationale or lack of suggests fraud;
– the terms are consistent with the management's explanations; and
– the transaction has been appropriately accounted for and disclosed.
 Obtain audit evidence that transactions have been appropriately authorized and approved
Management assertions
If management has made assertions in the financial statements to the effect that a related party
transaction was conducted on terms equivalent to those prevailing in an arm's length transaction,
the auditor must obtain evidence to support this. The nature of the evidence obtained will depend
on the support management has obtained to substantiate their claim but may involve:
 considering the appropriateness of management's process for supporting the assertion;
 verifying the source of internal and external data supporting the assertion and testing it for
accuracy, completeness and relevance; and
 evaluating the reasonableness of any significant assumptions on which the assertion is based
2.3 Evaluation of accounting and disclosure

The auditor is required to evaluate whether related parties and related party transactions have been
properly accounted for and disclosed and do not prevent the financial statements from achieving
fair presentation
2.4 Written representations

The auditor is required to obtain written representations from management and, where appropriate,
those charged with governance that all related parties and related party transactions have been
disclosed to the auditor and that these have been appropriately accounted for and disclosed.
An entity may require its management and those charged with governance to sign individual
declarations in relation to related party matters. It may be helpful if any such declarations are
addressed jointly to a designated official of the entity and also to the auditor
2.5 Documentation
The auditor is required to include in the audit documentation to identity of related parties and the
nature of related party relationships.
2.6 Identifying undisclosed related parties

It is often difficult to identify related party relationships and transactions which should have been
disclosed, but are not.

lOMoARcPSD|38463810
CFAP 6
Audit Focus
ISA 550 points out that the existence of the following relationships may indicate the presence of
control or significant influence:
(a) Direct or indirect equity holdings or other financial interests in the entity
(b) The entity's holdings of direct or indirect equity or other financial interests in other entities
(c) Being part of those charged with governance or key management (that is, those members of
management who have the authority and responsibility for planning, directing and controlling
the activities of the entity)
(d) Being a close family member of any person referred to in subparagraph (c)
(e) Having a significant business relationship with any person referred to in subparagraph (c)
The related parties described in subparagraph (c) above, and by extension those described in (d)
and (e), are often the hardest to identify. While entities related through equity interest should be
fairly clearly documented, auditors frequently struggle to identify related party transactions
established through connected persons.
The following risk assessment procedures are relevant when testing for the existence of undisclosed
related parties:
 Enquire of management and the directors as to whether transactions have taken place with
related parties that are required to be disclosed by the disclosure requirements that are
applicable to the entity
 Review prior year working papers for names of known related parties
 Review minutes of meetings of shareholders and directors and other relevant statutory records,
such as the register of directors' interests
 Review accounting records for large or unusual transactions or balances, in particular
transactions recognised at or near the end of the financial period
 Review confirmations of loans receivable and payable and confirmations from banks. Such
a review may indicate the relationship, if any, of guarantors to the entity
 Review investment transactions, for example purchase or sale of an interest in a joint venture
or other entity
 Enquire as to the names of all pension and other trusts established for the benefit of
employees and the names of their management and trustees
 Enquire as to the affiliation of directors and officers with other entities
 Review the register of interests in shares to determine the names of principal shareholders
 Enquire of other auditors currently involved in the audit, or predecessor auditors, as to their
knowledge of additional related parties
 Review the entity's tax returns, returns made under statute and other information supplied
to regulatory agencies for evidence of the existence of related parties

lOMoARcPSD|38463810
CFAP 6
Audit Focus
 Review invoices and correspondence from lawyers for indications of the existence of related
parties or related party transactions.

lOMoARcPSD|38463810
CFAP 6
Audit Focus
IFRS 15 – REVENUE FORM CONTRACTS WITH CUSTOMERS
IFRS 15 – REVENUE FROM CONTRACTS WITH CUSTOMERS

AUDIT PROCEDURES FOR TESTING IFRS 15
Stage of IFRS 15 Suggested audit procedures
Step 1: Identify the  Obtain copies of contracts between entities and customers
contract(s) with a
customer.
 Inspect contracts to confirm they are legally binding and effective for the
year of audit.
 For implied contracts (such as retail contracts) clarify the likely contractual
terms to establish rights and responsibilities in each case.
Step 2: Identify  Confirm the goods or services to be transferred, either individually or as

separate performance part of a series, by reference to the contracts in place.
obligations.
 Confirm whether any of the goods or service are not distinct by reference
to the contracts in place and if separate bundles.
Step 3: Determine  Identify the amount of consideration by reference to the contract

the transaction price.
 Where appropriate, confirm the split between variable and fixed elements
and re-calculate any variable amounts by reference to the contract terms.
 Test the hypothesis that variable consideration is highly probable by
reviewing the reasonableness of the underlying assumptions used in the
entity's calculations.
Step 4: Identify  Confirm stand-alone prices to individual elements of the contract as

separate performance performance obligations are settled
obligations.
 In the case of estimated stand-alone prices, test the assumptions
underpinning the calculations used by the entity for reasonableness.
Step 5: Recognize  For performance obligations satisfied at a point in time (such as retail
revenue as or when sales) confirm the occurrence of the event required (such as the sale itself)
each performance by reference to supporting documentation.
obligation is satisfied.
Other tests  For deferred consideration, confirm the proportion split between the value
of the goods on the date of sale and the financing income by reference to

lOMoARcPSD|38463810
CFAP 6
Audit Focus
the contract and testing the reasonableness of the entity's calculations for
recognizing revenue (such as interest rates for estimating fair value)
Consignment  Consider the existence of any indicators of consignment arrangements,

arrangements such as:
 Confirming who controls the product and what (if any) conditions need
to have occurred for control to be passed on.
 Clarifying who can require the return of a product or transfer it to a third
party.
Bill and hold  Consider the existence of such arrangements and if present, review the
arrangements conditions required by IFRS 15 have been met:
 Confirm that the customer owns the products stored by the seller by
reference to the contract terms, and obtain confirmation from the customer
that they are happy for the seller to hold them.
 Inspect the agreement between the seller and customer to confirm the
products can be accessed at any time and not transferred to another
customer.
AUDIT PROCEDURES FOR CONTRACTS IN WHICH PERFORMANCE OBLIGATIONS ARE SATISFIED

OVER TIME ('CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS')
Remember, under IFRS 15, the entity recognizes revenue in such cases by measuring progress
towards complete satisfaction of the performance obligation. Progress can be measured using
output methods (measuring the value to the customer of goods or services transferred to date) or
input methods (measuring the cost to the entity of goods or services transferred to date).
(IFRS 15.B14)
The following audit procedures will be relevant:
 Confirm contract price to contract agreed between client and customer
 Determine any amounts of conditional revenue/costs including the associated conditions
 Confirm the progress to date of the work completed, including any potential delays or
problems
 Confirm costs incurred to date (inputs) by reference to management accounts, invoices,
budgets and other relevant documentation
 Identify any expenditure not supporting fulfilment of the contract by inspecting board
minutes, management accounts or other documentation (such as legal correspondence)
 Confirm total costs estimated for contract to ensure no planned overspends have been
identified (again, budgets, board minutes or management accounts can be inspected)

lOMoARcPSD|38463810
CFAP 6
Audit Focus
 Confirm the amounts of contract work certified as complete (outputs) at the year end by
reference to relevant documentation (such as surveyors' reports or client estimates).

lOMoARcPSD|38463810
CFAP 6
Audit Focus
IAS 40 – INVESTMENT PROPERTIES

AUDIT EVIDENCE
Issue Evidence
Classification as an Confirm that all investment properties are classified in accordance with the
investment property IAS 40 definition. This will include:
 a building owned by the entity and leased out under one or more
operating leases; and.
 a building that is vacant but is held to be leased under one or more
operating leases.
Verify rental agreements, ensuring that the occupier is not a connected

company and that the rent has been negotiated at arm's length
If the building has recently been built, check the architect's certificates to
ensure that cost/fair value is reasonable.
Valuation If cost model adopted, check compliance with IAS 16.

If fair value model adopted:
 Check that fair value has been measured in accordance with IFRS 13
 Where current prices in an active market are not available confirm that
alternative valuation basis is reasonable and in accordance with IFRS 13,
and document the relevant audit evidence
 Agree valuation to valuer's certificate
 Recalculate gain or loss on change in fair value and agree to amount in
statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income
 If fair value cannot be measured reliably confirm use of cost model
 Consider the use of an auditor's expert to review the appropriateness of
the underlying market assumptions and valuation methodology used
Disclosure Confirm compliance with IAS 40/IFRS 13, for example:

 Disclosure of policy adopted
 If fair value model adopted disclosure of a reconciliation of carrying
amounts of investment property at the beginning and end of the period
 Disclosure of the inputs used to measure fair value based on the fair
value hierarchy (Level 1, Level 2 or Level 3)
 Where Level 2 or Level 3 inputs are used, a description of the valuation
techniques and inputs used (interest rates, net reversionary yield,
stabilised net rental value, costs to complete and developer's profit)

lOMoARcPSD|38463810
CFAP 6
Audit Focus
 For fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs (Level
3), the effect of the measurements on profit or loss and other
comprehensive income for the period
Note: IAS 40 states that fair value should be measured in accordance with IFRS 13.
RISK
The valuation process is inherently judgmental, which is why we consider this to be a risk of material
misstatement. In particular, changes in assumptions such as the capitalization rates, forecast rent
per square foot, forecast occupancy levels and, in the case of investment property under
construction, cost to complete can lead to significant movements in the value of the property, as
can changes in the underlying market conditions.
How the scope of our audit responded to the risk

(a) We assessed the design and implementation of controls around the property valuations by
considering the level of management oversight and review of the valuations prepared by the
external valuation specialists engaged by management, who have been named in note 14;
(b) We tested the integrity of the information provided by management to the valuer by agreeing
key inputs such as actual occupancy and net rent per square foot to underlying records and
source evidence;
(c) We modelled eight years of valuations and key valuation inputs to the investment property
portfolio, to understand the historical trends of key inputs and compared these against the key
forecast assumptions included in the property valuation;
(d) We met with the valuer. We assessed their independence, the scope of the work they were
requested to perform by management, and the valuation methodology applied. For each
property we identified as having significant or unusual valuation movements (compared to
market data or previous periods), we challenged the valuer on the key assumptions applied.
Our challenge was informed by input from our internal valuation specialists, utilizing their
knowledge and expertise in the market at a macro level and the relevant geographies to
challenge the key judgmental inputs noted adjacent. We also researched comparable
transactions and understood trends in analogous industries. We understood the rationale for
outlying valuations or movements and obtained corroborative evidence. We also assessed the
valuations for a sample of other properties; and
(e) We visited a sample of properties to assess the condition of the buildings.

lOMoARcPSD|38463810
CFAP 6
Audit Focus
IAS 10 AND 37 – CONTINGENCIES AND COMMITMENTS WITH EVETS AFTER REPORTING PERIOD
IAS 10 AND 37 – CONTINGENCIES AND COMMITMENTS WITH EVENTS

AFTER REPORTING PERIOD
AUDITING PROVISIONS AND CONTINGENCIES
Much of the audit work here is focused on ensuring that the recognition and treatment of these
items is in accordance with IAS 37, which we looked at in section 2 of this chapter.
The audit procedures that should be carried out on provisions and contingent assets and liabilities
are as follows:
 Obtain details of all provisions which have been included in the accounts and all contingencies
that have been disclosed.
 Obtain a detailed analysis of all provisions showing opening balances, movements and closing
balances.
 Determine for each material provision whether the company has a present obligation as a
result of past events by:
 reviewing of correspondence relating to the item; and
 discussing with the directors. Have they created a valid expectation in other parties that they
will discharge the obligation?
 Determine for each material provision whether it is probable that a transfer of economic
benefits will be required to settle the obligation by:
 checking whether any payments have been made after the end of the reporting period in
respect of the item;
 reviewing correspondences with solicitors, banks, customers, insurance company and
suppliers both pre and post year end;
 sending a letter to the solicitor to obtain their views (where relevant);
 discussing the position of similar past provisions with the directors. Were these provisions
eventually settled; and
 considering the likelihood of reimbursement.
 Recalculate all provisions made.
 Compare the amount provided with any post year end payments and with any amount paid in
the past for similar items.
 In the event that it is not possible to estimate the amount of the provision, check that this
contingent liability is disclosed in the accounts.
 Consider the nature of the client's business. Would you expect to see any other provisions, for
example warranties?
 Consider whether disclosures of provisions, contingent liabilities and contingent assets are
correct and sufficient.

lOMoARcPSD|38463810
CFAP 6
Audit Focus
PROCEDURES REGARDING LITIGATION AND CLAIMS

2.1 Litigation and claims
Litigation and claims involving the entity may have a material effect on the financial statements,
and so will require adjustment to or disclosure in those financial statements.
The auditor shall design and perform procedures in order to identify any litigation and claims
involving the entity which may give rise to a risk of material misstatement. (ISA 501.9)
Such procedures would include the following:

 Make appropriate inquiries of management and those charged with governance including
obtaining representations.
 Review board minutes and correspondence with the entity's lawyers.
 Examine legal expense account.
 Use any information obtained regarding the entity's business including information obtained
from discussions with any in-house legal department.
When litigation or claims have been identified or when the auditor believes they may exist, the
auditor must seek direct communication with the entity's lawyers.
(ISA 501.10)
This will help to obtain sufficient, appropriate audit evidence as to whether potential material
litigation and claims are known and management's estimates of the financial implications, including
costs, are reliable.
Form of the letter of inquiry

The letter, which should be prepared by management and sent by the auditor, should request the
lawyer to communicate directly with the auditor.
If it is thought unlikely that the lawyer will respond to a general inquiry, the letter should specify
the following.
 A list of litigation and claims
 Management's assessment of the outcome of the litigation or claim and its estimate of the
financial implications, including costs involved
 A request that the lawyer confirm the reasonableness of management's assessments and provide
the auditor with further information if the list is considered by the lawyer to be incomplete or
incorrect.
The auditors must consider these matters up to the date of their report and so a further, updating
letter may be necessary.

lOMoARcPSD|38463810
CFAP 6
Audit Focus
A meeting between the auditors and the lawyer may be required, for example where a complex
matter arises, or where there is a disagreement between management and the lawyer. Such
meetings should take place only with the permission of management, and preferably with a
management representative present.
If management refuses to give the auditor permission to communicate with the entity's lawyers or
if the lawyer refuses to respond as required and the auditor can find no alternative sufficient
evidence, this would mean that the auditor is unable to obtain sufficient, appropriate evidence and
should ordinarily lead to a qualified opinion or a disclaimer of opinion.
(ISA 501.11)
PROCEDURES REGARDING EVENTS AFTER THE REPORTING PERIOD

ISA 560, Subsequent Events sets out the audit requirements in relation to events occurring after the
reporting period.

lOMoARcPSD|38463810
CFAP 6
Audit Focus
IFRS 16 – LEASES
IFRS 16 – LEASES
AUDITING LEASES
In auditing leases recognized at fair value, the auditor must evaluate whether the fair value is
appropriate.
The table below summarises the areas of audit focus when auditing leases in accordance with IAS
17, and provides some examples of audit evidence required.
Issue Evidence
Ascertaining that the leases Obtain schedules of finance leases and operating leases, including any
recorded in the financial leases that existed at the end of the prior period, and any new leases.
statements are complete.
Determine that any leased property is still in use.
Obtain assurance about the completeness of the schedule by making
inquiries of informed management, and consider any evidence of
additional leases by examining other documents such as board meeting
minutes, significant contracts and property additions.
The classification of the Review lease agreements for indicators that the risks and rewards of
leases reflects the substance ownership have been transferred to the entity, such as:
of the transaction.  responsibility for repairs and maintenance;
 transfer of legal title at the end of the lease term;
 the lease is for most of the assets' useful life; and
 the present value of the minimum lease payments is substantially all of
the assets' fair value.
Ascertaining that the Select a sample of entries in the lease expense account, and verify that
operating lease expenses they relate to operating leases.
have been correctly
recorded in profit or loss Recalculate operating lease expenses, on a straight-line basis over the
lease term.
Ascertaining that the Recalculate the finance charges charged against profit and loss.
finance leases have been Agree interest rates used in calculations to lease agreements.
correctly recorded in the Agree the calculation of the leased assets' fair value to external evidence,
statements of financial such as market prices or surveyors' reports.
position and profit or loss Recalculate the depreciation charges applied to non-current assets
Review the assumptions made in respect of the useful life of each finance
lease asset, and agree the useful life/lease term to the depreciation
workings to ensure that the assets are depreciated over an appropriate
period.

lOMoARcPSD|38463810
CFAP 6
Audit Focus
IFRS 16 – LEASES
Review rentals paid during the year to verify that rental payments are
split between the finance charge element and the repayment of capital
in accordance with IAS 17.
Ascertaining that the lease Review the disclosures in the financial statements to determine whether
liability has been disclosed the disclosures are consistent and complete.
in the financial statements
in accordance with IFRSs

lOMoARcPSD|38463810
CFAP 6
Audit Focus
IFRS 09, IFRS 07, IAS 32: FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

AUDIT ISSUES AROUND FAIR VALUE
For the auditor the use of fair values will raise a number of issues. The determination of fair value
will generally be more difficult than determining historical cost. It will be more difficult to establish
whether fair value is reasonable for complex assets and liabilities than for more straightforward
assets or liabilities which have an actively traded market and therefore a market value.
Generally speaking, the trend towards fair value accounting will increase audit work required, not
only because determining fair values is more difficult, but also because fair values fluctuate in a
way that historical costs do not, and will need vouching each audit period. Fair value will, for the
same reasons, increase audit risk.
The ISA treats fair values as a type of accounting estimate and therefore the requirements of the
ISA apply to fair values as they would to any other type of accounting estimate.
RISK ASSESSMENT
Management is responsible for establishing the process for determining fair values. This process
will vary considerably from organization to organization. Some companies will habitually value items
at historical cost where possible, and may have poor processes for determining fair values if
required. Others may have complex systems for determining fair value if they have a large number
of assets and liabilities which they account for at fair value, particularly where a high degree of
estimation is involved.
Not all financial statement items requiring measurement at fair value involve estimation uncertainty.
In accordance with IFRS 13, entities should maximize the use of relevant observable inputs. For
example, if using a Level 1 input (eg, the unadjusted quoted price in an active market of equity
shares in a listed company), there is no estimation uncertainty.
For others, however, there may be moderate (eg, Level 2 inputs) or relatively high estimation
uncertainty (eg, Level 3 inputs), particularly where they are based on significant assumptions, for
example:
 Fair value estimates for derivative financial instruments not publicly traded
 Fair value estimates for which a highly specialized entity-developed model is used or for which
there are assumptions or inputs that cannot be observed in the marketplace.
ISA 540 requires the auditor to assess the entity's process for determining fair value measurements
and disclosures and the related control activities and to assess the risks of material misstatement.
In practical terms, this would include considering the following:
 The valuation techniques adopted (ie, Level 1, 2 or 3)

lOMoARcPSD|38463810
CFAP 6
Audit Focus
 The valuation approach used in making the accounting estimate (ie, income approach, market
approach, cost approach)
 The market in which the transaction is assumed to have taken place (ie, principal market or most
advantageous market)
 The relevant control activities over the process (eg, controls over data and the segregation of
duties between those committing the entity to the underlying transaction and those responsible
for undertaking the valuations)
 The expertise and experience of those persons determining the fair value measurements
 The role that information technology has in the process
 The types of accounts or transactions requiring fair value measurements or disclosures (eg,
whether the accounts arise from routine/recurring transactions or non-routine/unusual
transactions)
 The significant management assumptions used (particularly where Level 3 unobservable inputs
are used)
 Whether there has been or ought to have been a change from the prior period in the methods
for making the accounting estimates, and, if so, why (a change in valuation technique is
considered to be a change in accounting estimate in accordance with IAS 8.)
 Whether, and if so how, management has assessed the effect of estimation uncertainty
 The extent to which the process relies on a service organization.
 The extent to which the entity uses the work of experts in determining fair value measurements
and disclosures
 Documentation supporting management's assumptions
 The methods used to develop and apply management assumptions and to monitor changes in
those assumptions
 The integrity of change controls and security procedures for valuation models and relevant
information systems, including approval processes
 Controls over the consistency, timeliness and reliability of the data used in valuation models.
Evaluating the appropriateness of fair value

ISA 540 requires the auditor to evaluate whether the fair value measurements and disclosures in
the financial statements are in accordance with the entity's applicable financial reporting framework.
In some cases, the financial reporting framework may prescribe the method of measurement – for
example, a particular model that is to be used in measuring a fair value estimate. In many cases,
however, the method is not specified, or there may be a number of alternative methods available.
The auditor may consider the following:

lOMoARcPSD|38463810
CFAP 6
Audit Focus
 How management considered the nature of the asset or liability when selecting a particular
method
 Whether the entity operates in a particular business, industry or environment in which there are
methods commonly used to make the particular type of estimate.
Audit procedures in response to risk assessment

ISA 540 states that the auditor must perform further audit procedures designed to address the risk
of misstatement.
The nature, timing and extent of further audit procedures will depend heavily on the complexity of
the fair value measurement. For example, the fair value measurement of assets that are sold in
open, active markets which provide readily available and reliable information on the prices at which
exchanges actually occur should be relatively straightforward eg, published price quotations for
marketable securities.
Alternatively, a specific asset may not have an active market or may possess characteristics that
make it necessary for management to estimate its fair value (eg, an investment property or a
complex derivative financial instrument). The estimation of fair value may be achieved through the
use of a valuation model (for example, a model premised on projections and discounting of future
cash flows, or an option pricing model) or through the help of an expert such as an independent
expert (e.g., to value property, brands or other specialist assets).
Complex fair value measurements, particularly Level 3 unobservable inputs, are normally
characterized by greater uncertainty regarding the reliability of the measurement process. This
greater uncertainty may be the result of the following:
 The length of the forecast period.
 The number of significant and complex assumptions associated with the process
 A higher degree of subjectivity associated with the assumptions and factors used in the process
 A higher degree of uncertainty associated with the future occurrence or outcome of events
underlying the assumptions used When obtaining audit evidence, the auditor evaluates whether
the following are true:
 The assumptions used by management are reasonable.
 The fair value was measured using an appropriate model (eg, the model prescribed in IFRS 13,
if applicable).
 Management used relevant information that was reasonably available at the time.
Other actions by the auditor would include the following:

 The auditor should consider the effect of subsequent events on the fair value measurements
and disclosures in the financial statements.

lOMoARcPSD|38463810
CFAP 6
Audit Focus
 The auditor should evaluate whether the disclosures about fair values made by the entity are in
accordance with its financial reporting framework (eg, IFRS 13 disclosure requirements).
 The auditor should obtain written representations from management.
Where an accounting estimate has high estimation uncertainty the auditor may conclude that
this must be communicated as a KAM in accordance with ISA 701.
(ISA 540.A114).
AUDITING FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

IAPN 1000
The introduction of the IAPN sets out the scope. It explains that the IAPN does not address the
simplest financial instruments such as cash, simple loans, trade accounts receivable and trade
accounts payable, nor the most complex ones. It also does not address specific accounting
requirements, such as those relating to hedge accounting, offsetting or impairment.
Section I – Background information about financial instruments

Purpose and risks of using financial instruments
Financial instruments are used for the following purposes:
 Hedging purposes (ie, to change an existing risk profile to which an entity is exposed)
 Trading purposes (ie, to enable an entity to take a risk position to benefit from long-term
investment returns or from short-term market movements)
 Investment purposes (eg, to enable an entity to benefit from long-term investment returns)
Management and those charged with governance might not:

 fully understand the risks of using financial instruments
 have the expertise to value them appropriately
 have sufficient controls in place over financial instrument activities
Business risk and the risk of material misstatement also increase when management inappropriately
hedge risk or speculate.
In particular the entity may be exposed to the following types of risk:
(a) Credit risk (the risk that one party will cause a financial loss to another party by failing to
discharge an obligation)
(b) Market risk (the risk that the fair value or future cash flow of a financial instrument will fluctuate
because of changes in market prices eg, currency risk, interest rate risk, commodity and equity
price risk)
(c) Liquidity risk (includes the risk of not being able to buy or sell a financial instrument at an
appropriate price in a timely manner due to a lack of marketability for that financial instrument)
(d) Operational risk (related to the specific processing required for financial instruments)

lOMoARcPSD|38463810
CFAP 6
Audit Focus
The risk of fraud may also be increased where an employee in a position to perpetrate a financial
fraud understands both the financial instruments and the process for accounting for them, but
management and those charged with governance have a lesser degree of understanding.
Controls relating to financial instruments

The level of sophistication of an entity's internal control will be affected by the size of the entity
and the extent and complexity of the financial instruments used. An entity's internal control over
financial instruments is more likely to be effective when management and those charged with
governance have:
(a) established an appropriate control environment;
(b) established a risk management process;
(c) established information systems that provide an understanding of the nature of the financial
instrument activities and the associated risks; and
(d) designed, implemented and documented a system of internal control to:

 provide reasonable assurance that the use of financial instruments is within the entity's risk
management policies;
 properly present financial instruments in the financial statements;
 ensure that the entity is in compliance with applicable laws and regulations; and
 monitor risk.
The Appendix to IAPN 1000 provides examples of controls that may exist in an entity that deals
with a high volume of financial instrument transactions. These include authorization, segregation of
duties (particularly of those executing the transaction (dealing) and those initiating cash payments
and receipts (settlements)) and reconciliations of the entity's records to external banks' and
custodians' records.
Completeness, accuracy and existence

The IAPN discusses a number of practical issues. For example, it explains that where transactions
are cleared through a clearing house the entity should have processes to manage the information
delivered to the clearing house. Adequate IT controls must also be maintained.
It also explains that in financial institutions where there is a high volume of trading, a senior
employee typically reviews daily profits and losses on individual traders' books to evaluate whether
they are reasonable based on the employee's knowledge of the market. Doing so may enable
management to determine that particular trades were not completely or accurately recorded, or
may identify fraud by a particular trader.
Valuation of financial instruments

Section I also provides material on financial reporting requirements. It explains that many financial
reporting frameworks require financial instruments, including embedded derivatives, to be measured
at fair value. In general, the objective of fair value is to arrive at the price at which an orderly

lOMoARcPSD|38463810
CFAP 6
Audit Focus
transaction would take place between market participants at the measurement date under current
market conditions; that is, it is not the transaction price for a forced liquidation or distressed sale.
In meeting this objective all relevant market information is taken into account. It also explains that
fair value measurement may arise at both the initial recording of transactions and later when there
are changes in value. Changes in fair value measurement may be treated differently depending on
the reporting framework. The IAPN then explores features of different financial reporting
frameworks, including the following:
 The fair value hierarchy (as adopted by IFRS 13)
 The effects of inactive markets
 Management's valuation processes
 The use of models, third-party pricing sources and experts (entities often make use of a third
party to obtain fair value information, particularly when expertise or data are required that
management does not possess).
Section II – Audit considerations relating to financial instruments

IAPN 1000 identifies certain factors that make auditing complex financial instruments particularly
challenging:
 Management and the auditors may find it difficult to understand the nature of the instruments
and the risks to which the entity is exposed.
 Markets can change quickly, placing pressure on management to manage their exposures
effectively.
 Evidence supporting valuation may be difficult to obtain.
 Individual payments may be significant, which may increase the risk of misappropriation of assets.
 The amount recorded may not be significant, but there may be significant risks and exposures
associated with these complex financial instruments.
 A few employees may exert significant influence on the entity's financial instruments transactions,
in particular where compensation arrangements are tied to revenue from these.
Professional scepticism
The need for professional scepticism increases with the complexity of the financial instruments, for
example with regard to the following:
 Evaluating whether sufficient appropriate audit evidence has been obtained (which can be
particularly challenging when models are used or in determining if markets are inactive)
 Evaluating management's judgements and potential for management bias in applying the
applicable financial reporting framework (eg, choice of valuation techniques, use of assumptions
in valuation techniques)
 Drawing conclusions based on the audit evidence obtained (for example assessing the
reasonableness of valuations prepared by management's experts)

lOMoARcPSD|38463810
CFAP 6
Audit Focus
Planning considerations
The auditor's focus in planning is particularly on the following:
 Understanding the accounting and disclosure requirements ISA 540 requires the auditor to obtain
an understanding of the requirements of the applicable financial reporting framework relevant
to accounting estimates.
 Understanding the complex financial instruments This helps the auditor to identify whether:
– important aspects of a transaction are missing or inaccurately recorded;
– a valuation appears appropriate;
– the risks inherent in them are fully understood and managed by the entity; or
– the financial instruments are appropriately classified into current and non-current assets and
liabilities.
Understanding management's process for identifying and accounting for embedded derivatives
will help the auditor to understand the risks to which the entity is exposed.
 Determining whether specialized skills and knowledge are needed in the audit
The engagement partner must be satisfied that the engagement team and any auditor's experts
collectively have the appropriate competence and capabilities.
 Understanding and evaluating the system of internal control in the light of the entity's financial
instrument transactions and the information systems that fall within the scope of the audit.
This understanding must be obtained in accordance with ISA 315. This understanding enables
the auditor to identify and assess the risks of material misstatement at the financial statement
and assertions levels, providing a basis for designing and implementing responses to the
assessed risks of material misstatement.
 Understanding the nature, role and activities of the internal audit function Areas where the work
of the internal audit function may be particularly relevant are as follows:
– Developing a general overview of the extent of use of financial instruments.
– Evaluating the appropriateness of policies and procedures and management's compliance
with them
– Evaluating the operating effectiveness of financial instrument control activities
– Evaluating systems relevant to financial instrument activities
– Assessing whether new risks relating to financial instruments are identified, assessed and
managed
 Understanding management's process for valuing financial instruments, including whether
management has used an expert or a service organization Again this understanding is required
in accordance with ISA 540.

lOMoARcPSD|38463810
CFAP 6
Audit Focus
 Assessing and responding to the risk of material misstatement (see below)
Assessing and responding to the risk of material misstatement

Factors affecting the risk of material misstatement include the following:
 The volume of financial instruments to which the entity is exposed
 The terms of the financial instruments
 The nature of the financial instruments
 Fraud risk factors (eg, where there are employee compensation schemes, difficult financial market
conditions, ability to override controls)
The assessment of risk will determine the appropriate audit approach in accordance with ISA 330,
The Auditor's Responses to Assessed Risks, including substantive procedures and tests of controls.
Where the entity is involved in a high level of trading and use of financial instruments, it is unlikely
that sufficient evidence will be obtained through substantive testing alone. Where there are relatively
few transactions of this nature a substantive approach may be more efficient. In reaching a decision
on the nature, timing and extent of testing of controls the auditor may consider factors such as:
 the nature, frequency and volume of financial instrument transactions;
 the strength of controls including design;
 the importance of controls to the overall control objectives;
 the monitoring of controls and identified deficiencies in control procedures;
 the issues controls are intended to address;
 frequency of performance of control activities;
 level of precision the controls are intended to achieve;
 evidence of performance of control activities; and
 timing of key financial instrument transactions (eg, whether they are close to the period end).
Designing substantive procedures will include consideration of the following:

 Use of analytical procedures – they may be less effective as substantive procedures when
performed alone, as the complex drivers of valuation often mask unusual trends
 Non-routine transactions – this applies to many financial instrument transactions and a
substantive approach will normally be the most effective means of achieving the planned audit
objectives
 Availability of evidence – eg, when the entity uses a third-party pricing source, evidence may not
be available from the entity
 Procedures performed in other audit areas – these may provide evidence about completeness
of financial instrument transactions eg, tests of subsequent cash receipts and payments, and the
search for unrecorded liabilities
 Selection of items for testing – where the financial instrument portfolio comprises instruments
with varying complexity and risk judgmental sampling may be useful.

lOMoARcPSD|38463810
CFAP 6
Audit Focus
In some cases 'dual-purpose' tests may be used ie, it may be efficient to perform a test of controls
and a test of details on the same transaction eg, testing whether a signed contract has been
maintained (test of controls) and whether the details of the financial instrument have been
appropriately captured in a summary sheet (test of details). Areas of significant judgement would
normally be tested close to, or at, the period end.
Procedures relating to completeness, accuracy, existence, occurrence and rights and obligations may
include the following:
 Remaining alert during the audit when inspecting records or documents (eg, minutes of meetings
of those charged with governance, specific invoices and correspondence with the entity's
professional advisers)
 External confirmation of bank accounts, trades and custodian statements
 Reconciliation of external data with the entity's own records Reading individual contracts and
reviewing support documentation
 Reviewing journal entries or the internal control over the recording of such entries to determine
if entries have been made by employees other than those authorized to do so
 Testing controls eg, by reperforming controls.
Valuation of financial instruments

Management is responsible for the valuation of complex financial instruments and must develop a
valuation methodology. In testing how management values the financial instrument, the auditor
should undertake one or more of the following procedures:
(a) Test how management made the accounting estimate and the data on which it is based
(including any models)
(b) Test the operating effectiveness of controls over how management made the accounting
estimate, together with appropriate substantive procedures
(c) Develop a point estimate or a range to evaluate management's point estimate

(d) Determine whether events occurring up to the date of the auditor's report provide audit
evidence regarding the accounting estimate.
Audit procedures may include the following:

 Reviewing and assessing the judgements made by management
 Considering whether there are any other relevant price indicators or factors to take into account
 Obtaining third-party evidence of price indicators eg, by obtaining a broker quote
 Assessing the mathematical accuracy of the methodology employed
 Testing data to source materials
Significant risk
The auditor's risk assessment may lead to the identification of one or more significant risks relating
to valuation. The following circumstances would be indicators that a significant risk may exist:

lOMoARcPSD|38463810
CFAP 6
Audit Focus
 High measurement uncertainty
 Lack of sufficient evidence to support management's valuation
 Lack of management understanding of its financial instruments or expertise to value these
correctly
 Lack of management understanding of the complex requirements of the applicable financial
reporting framework
 The significance of valuation adjustments made to model outputs when the applicable reporting
framework requires or permits such adjustments.
Where significant risks have been identified the auditor is required to evaluate how management
has considered alternative assumptions or outcomes and why it has rejected them, or how
management has addressed estimation uncertainty in making the accounting estimate. The auditor
must also evaluate whether the significant assumptions used by management are reasonable. To
do this the auditor must exercise professional judgement.
The IAPN also considers audit considerations for valuation in three specific circumstances: when
management uses a third-party pricing source, when management estimates fair value using a
model and when a management's expert is used.
Possible approaches to gathering evidence regarding information from third-party pricing sources
may include the following:
 For Level 1 inputs, comparing the information from third-party pricing sources with observable
market prices
 Reviewing disclosures provided by third-party pricing sources about their controls and processes,
valuation techniques, inputs and assumptions
 Testing the controls management has in place to assess the reliability of information from third-
party pricing sources
 Performing procedures at the third-party pricing source to understand and test the controls and
processes, valuation techniques, inputs and assumptions used for asset classes or specific
financial instruments of interest
 Evaluating whether the prices obtained from third-party pricing sources are reasonable in relation
to prices from other third-party pricing sources, the entity's estimate or the auditor's own
estimate
 Evaluating the reasonableness of valuation techniques, assumptions and inputs
 Developing a point estimate or a range for some financial instruments priced by the thirdparty
pricing source and evaluating whether the results are within a reasonable range of each other
 Obtaining a service auditor's report that covers the controls over validation of the prices.
When management estimates fair value using a model IAPN 1000 states that testing the model can
be accomplished by two main approaches:

lOMoARcPSD|38463810
CFAP 6
Audit Focus
(1) The auditor can test management's model, by considering the appropriateness of the model
used by management, the reasonableness of the assumptions and data used, and the
mathematical accuracy.
(2) The auditor can develop their own estimate and then compare the auditor's valuation with that
of the entity.
When a management expert is used the requirements which must be applied are the basic
requirements of ISA 500 as discussed in Chapter 6. Procedures would include evaluating the
competence, capabilities and objectivity of the management's expert, obtaining an understanding
of their work and evaluating the appropriateness of that expert's work as audit evidence.
Presentation and disclosure

Audit procedures around presentation and disclosure are designed in consideration of the assertions
of occurrence and rights and obligations, completeness, classification and understandability, and
accuracy and valuation.
Other relevant audit considerations

Written representations should be sought from management in accordance with ISA 540 and ISA
580, Written Representahkations.
2.1.1 Practice Note 23

Practice Note 23 Special Considerations in Auditing Financial Instruments was revised in July 2013.
The revised Practice note is based on IAPN 1000 discussed above. Some additional points are
however included as follows:
Section 1
 Operational risk includes model risk (the risk that imperfections and subjectivity of valuation
models are not properly understood, accounted for or adjusted for) (PN23.18)
 Complete and accurate recording of financial instruments is an essential core objective (PN23.24-
1)
 When quoted prices are used as evidence of fair value, the source should be independent and
where possible more than one quote (PN23.44-1)
 Where a price has been obtained from a pricing service and that price has been challenged,
when considering whether the corrected price is a suitable basis for valuation, consideration
should be given to how long the challenge process has taken and whether the underlying data
remains valid (PN23.56-1)
 A key control over management's valuation process may be an independent price verification
function which forms part of internal control (PN23.62-1)
Section 2

lOMoARcPSD|38463810
CFAP 6
Audit Focus
 Although it is not part of the auditor's role to determine the amount of risk an entity should
take on, obtaining an understanding of the risk management process may identify risks of
material misstatement (PN23.70-1)
 Assertions about valuation may be based on highly subjective assumptions, therefore evaluating
audit evidence in respect of these requires considerable judgment (PN23.71-2)
 Determining materiality for financial instruments may be particularly difficult (PN23.73-1)
 When deciding which audits other than those of listed entities require an engagement quality
control review, the existence of financial instruments may be a relevant factor (PN23.73-2)
 When obtaining an understanding of the entity's financial instruments, the auditor will consider
the view of any correspondence with regulators in accordance with the FCA Code (PN23.76-2)
 The involvement of experts or specialists may be needed (PN23.79)
 The auditor may need to consider the control environment applicable to those responsible for
functions dealing with financial instruments (PN23.89-2)
 Substantive procedures will include reviewing operational data such as reconciling differences
(PN23.104)
 The auditor may use information included in a Prudent Valuation Return (prepared by UK banks
and other regulated entities in the financial sector) to understand the uncertainties associated
with the financial instruments used and disclosed by these entities (PN23.108-1)
 Tests of valuation include: verifying the external prices used to value financial instruments,
confirming the validity of valuation models, and evaluating the overall results and reserving for
residual uncertainties (PN23.113-1)
 The auditor must consider whether management has given proper consideration to the models
used (PN23.134-1)
 When evaluating the amount of an adjustment that might be required, the auditor considers all
factors taken into account in the valuation process and uses experience and judgment (PN23.137-
1).
AUDITING DERIVATIVES
Auditing derivatives in the modern world
The key to using derivatives as part of an overall investment strategy is to have adequate internal
controls in place and trained personnel handling the investments. Derivatives, which have been
around for a very long time in one form or another, have been put to good use by transferring risk
from one party, the hedger, to another, the speculator. There are many factors in today's world
which can cause derivative investment strategies to go wrong. As we have seen, such factors can
 A lack of internal controls
 A laissez-faire management

lOMoARcPSD|38463810
CFAP 6
Audit Focus
 Greed
 Ineffective systems to identify and monitor risk
 Inexperience
An understanding of the business process involved in derivatives trading is necessary in order to

audit derivatives successfully. The steps in a typical process are as follows:
(1) Entering the deal in the trader's deal sheet
(2) Trader types the deal into the system and sends an email
(3) The back office include the deal in reports
(4) Back office process the deal using market quote information from agencies
(5) Enter details into a 'pre-programmed' Excel sheet and/or other processing package
(6) Confirm deal with brokers/counterparties
(7) Carry out monthly settlement/processing
(8) Net off between Accounts Payable and Accounts Receivable and wire the payment as necessary.
Each type of derivative will be different and non-standard derivatives will be unique. This poses
challenges for the auditor.
Generally, however, the auditor should seek to:
(a) understand the client's business in order to establish the real role played by, and the risks that
are inherent in, the derivatives activity;
(b) document the system. This would involve documenting various processes;
(c) identify the controls in each process in order to establish the risk passed to the client by
inadequate or missing controls; and, therefore, to establish the audit risk and thus the audit
work that needs to be performed;
(d) carry out the appropriate control and substantive audit procedures; and
(e) make conclusions and report on the outcome of the audit of derivatives.
Obviously, the exact nature of what is to be done is dependent on the circumstances of the client.
Ensuring that the information has been captured completely and accurately in each case is
important.

lOMoARcPSD|38463810
CFAP 6
Audit Focus
IAS 19 – EMPLOYEE BENEFITS

AUDITING EVIDENCE
Issue Evidence
Scheme assets (including  Ask directors to reconcile the scheme assets valuation at the
quoted and unquoted scheme year-end date with the assets valuation at the reporting
securities, debt instruments, entity's date being used for IAS 19 purposes.
properties)  Obtain direct confirmation of the scheme assets from the
investment custodian.
 Consider requiring scheme auditors to perform procedures.
Scheme liabilities  Auditors must follow the principles relating to work done by a
management's expert as defined in ISA (UK) 500, Audit Evidence
(and covered in Chapter 6) to assess whether it is appropriate to
rely on the actuary's work.
 Specific matters would include:
– the source data used;
– the assumptions and methods used; and
– the results of actuaries' work in the light of auditors'
knowledge of the business and results of other audit
procedures. Actuarial source data is likely to include:
 scheme member data (for example, classes of member and
contribution details); and
 scheme asset information (for example, values and income and
expenditure items)
Actuarial assumptions (for Auditors will not have the same expertise as actuaries and are unlikely
example, mortality rates, to be able to challenge the appropriateness and reasonableness of
termination rates, retirement the assumptions. They should nevertheless ascertain the qualifications
age and changes in salary and and experience of the actuaries. Auditors can, also, through discussion
benefit levels) with directors and actuaries:
 obtain a general understanding of the assumptions and review
the process used to develop them;
 consider whether assumptions comply with IAS 19 requirements
ie, are unbiased and based on market expectations at the year
end, over the period during which obligations will be settled;
 compare the assumptions with those which directors have used
in prior years;
 consider whether, based on their knowledge of the reporting
entity and the scheme, and on the results of other audit
procedures, the assumptions appear to be reasonable and

lOMoARcPSD|38463810
CFAP 6
Audit Focus
compatible with those used elsewhere in the preparation of the
entity's financial statements; and
 obtain written representations from directors confirming that
the assumptions are consistent with their knowledge of the
business.
Items charged to profit or  Discuss with directors and actuaries the factors affecting current
loss (current service cost, past service cost (for example, a scheme closed to new entrants may
service cost, gains and losses see an increase year on year as a percentage of pay with the
on settlements and average age of the workforce increasing).
curtailments)  Confirm that net interest cost has been based on the discount
rate determined by reference to market yields on high-quality
fixed-rate corporate bonds
Items recognized in other  Check basis of updated assumptions used to calculate actuarial
comprehensive income gains/losses.
 Check basis of calculation of return on plan assets ie, using
current fair values. Fair values must be measured in accordance
with IFRS 13
Contributions paid into plan  Agree cash payments to cash book/bank statements.
(Retirement benefits paid out
are paid by the pension plan
itself so there is no cash entry
in the entity's books)
Where the results of auditors' work are inconsistent with the directors' and actuaries', additional
procedures, such as requesting directors to obtain evidence from another actuary, may help in
resolving the inconsistency.

lOMoARcPSD|38463810
CFAP 6
Audit Focus
IFRS 2 – SHARE-BASED PAYMENT
IFRS 2 – SHARE-BASED PAYMENT

AUDIT EVIDENCE
Issue Evidence
Number of employees in scheme/number of  Scheme details set out in contractual
instruments per employee/length of vesting documentation
period
Number of employees estimated to benefit  Inquire of directors
 Compare to staffing numbers per forecasts and
prediction
Fair value of instruments  For equity-settled schemes check that fair value
is estimated at the grant date.
 For cash-settled schemes check that the fair
value is recalculated at the end of the reporting
period and at the date of settlement.
 Check that model used to estimate fair value is
in line with IFRS 2 and is appropriate to the
conditions. Consider obtaining expert advice on
the valuation if appropriate.
General  Obtain representations from management
confirming their view that:
– the assumptions used in measuring the expense
are reasonable, and
– there are no share-based payment schemes in
existence that have not been disclosed to the
auditors.

lOMoARcPSD|38463810
CFAP 6
Audit Focus
IAS 21 AND 29 – FOREIGN CURRENCY TRANSLATION AND HYPERINFLATION
IAS 21 AND 29 – FOREIGN CURRENCY TRANSLATION AND
HYPERINFLATION
AUDIT PROCEDURES
These would include the following:
 Check that the balances of the subsidiary have been appropriately translated to the group
reporting currency:
– Assets and liabilities at the closing rate at the end of the reporting period.
– Income and expenditure at the rate ruling at the transaction date. An average would be a
suitable alternative provided there have been no significant fluctuations.
 Confirm consistency of treatment of the translation of equity (closing rate or historical rate).
 Check that the consolidation process has been performed correctly eg, elimination of intragroup
balances.
 Check the basis of the calculation of the non-controlling interest.
 Confirm that goodwill has been translated at the closing rate.
 Check the disclosure of exchange differences as a separate component of equity.
 Assess whether disclosure requirements of IAS 21 have been satisfied.
 If the foreign operation is operating in a hyperinflationary economy confirm that the financial
statements have been adjusted under IAS 29, Financial Reporting in Hyperinflationary Economies
before they are translated and consolidated.
 Involve a specialist tax audit team to review the calculation of tax balances against submitted
and draft tax returns.

lOMoARcPSD|38463810
CFAP 6
Audit Focus
IAS 12 – INCOME TAXES

AUDIT RISKS
Until recently, tax accounting has been of secondary concern in the corporate group reporting
process. The tax figures in the financial statements are, however, often material by their nature, and
the increased public interest around tax avoidance now places greater pressure on companies and
groups to get tax reporting right.
The following factors increase the audit risk in respect of current and deferred tax, particularly in a
group reporting context:
 Lack of tax accounting knowledge: even in larger groups with in-house tax specialist resource,
the board is often more interested in the cash cost of tax than in tax accounting, although
getting the tax rate in line with analysts' expectations does still promote investor confidence.
 Lack of foreign tax knowledge: the tax figures of foreign operations are particularly at risk of
misstatement, and auditing them may require specialist knowledge.
 Complex or unusual transactions: the tax implications of such transactions may be overlooked
by management, but they can be complex and material.
 Lack of appropriate tax reporting processes: the basic processes (such as Excel spreadsheets)
used by many entities are unable to respond to complex tax reporting requirements. The use of
manual input increases the risk of errors, and may render workings difficult to audit.
Use of tax specialists

On the audit of larger or more complex entities, tax audit specialists are likely to be actively involved
from the start of the audit as members of the audit team, using their tax accounting expertise to
carry out the review of tax figures in the statement of financial position and statement of profit or
loss. In such cases, the tax audit team will report their findings, including any identified
misstatements and any areas of significant uncertainty, to the audit team. The tax team's workings
papers must be included within the audit working papers file.
CURRENT TAX: AUDIT PROCEDURES

Auditors (or the tax specialists involved in the audit) should carry out audit procedures including
the following:
 Obtain copies of the prior period tax computation.
 Inquire whether any tax enquiries have been raised by the tax authorities in the period.
 Inquire into the status of any unresolved tax enquiries, and obtain supporting correspondence
with the tax authorities. Obtain copies of the current period tax computation, and evaluate
whether:
– the opening balances agree to the closing balances in the prior period tax computation;
– the figures in the tax computation agree to figures in the financial statements;

lOMoARcPSD|38463810
CFAP 6
Audit Focus
– estimates contained within the tax computation are based on reasonable assumptions; and
– all tax rates and allowances are based on applicable tax legislation.
 Review details of tax payments made/refunds received in the period, and agree payments to the
cash and bank account.
DEFERRED TAX: AUDIT PROCEDURES

The following procedures will be relevant:
 Consider whether it is appropriate for the company to recognize deferred tax (eg, is the company
expected to make future taxable profits against which the deferred tax would unwind?).
 Obtain a copy of the deferred tax workings.
 Check the arithmetical accuracy of the deferred tax working.
 Agree the figures used to calculate temporary differences to those on the tax computation and
the financial statements.
 Consider the assumptions made in the light of the auditor's knowledge of the business and any
other evidence gathered during the course of the audit to ensure reasonableness.
 Agree the opening position on the deferred tax account to the prior year financial statements.
 Review the basis of the provision to ensure:
– it is in line with accounting practice under IAS 12, Income Taxes; and
– any changes in accounting policy have been disclosed.
 Verify that the rate of corporation tax at which the deferred tax asset/liability unwinds is
appropriate and in line with current tax legislation.
 To test for completeness (understatement) the auditor should review the draft financial
statements to identify items that would normally be expected to give a temporary difference
and ensure they have been included.
Transfer pricing
Besides auditing current and deferred tax, transfer pricing is an important area over which sufficient
appropriate audit evidence must be sought. When the entity's transfer pricing policies are
challenged by the tax authorities, the effect on the company's current tax position over several years
is likely to be material.

lOMoARcPSD|38463810
CFAP 6
Audit Focus
GROUP: TYPES OF INVESTMENT AND BUSINESS COMBINATION
GROUPS: TYPES OF INVESTMENT AND BUSINESS COMBINATION

PLANNING AND RISK ASSESSMENT AS GROUP AUDITOR
The planning and risk assessment process will need to take into account the fact that all elements
of the group financial statements are not audited by the group auditor directly. The group auditor
will not be able to simply rely on the conclusions of the component auditor. ISA 600 requires the
group auditor to evaluate the reliability of the component auditor and the work performed. This
will then determine the extent of further procedures.
RISK ASSESSMENT PROCEDURES

General accounting issues
Consolidated financial statements give rise to additional audit risks:
 Are consolidated group accounts correctly prepared?
 Where there have been any disposals of material business segments, have the requirements of
IFRS 5, Non-current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations been satisfied?
 Have adequate disclosures of significant investments and financing been made?
 Where there have been acquisitions during the year, have new assets and liabilities been
correctly brought into the financial statements?
 Where there have been acquisitions during the year, has purchase consideration been correctly
accounted for and disclosed?
 Have foreign taxes (including corporate tax, income taxes for employees and capital gains tax)
been accounted for correctly?
 Have transfer pricing issues around intercompany transactions, and their VAT impact, been
considered?
Acquisition
Acquisitions can take many forms. The type of acquisition (eg, hostile, friendly) and future
management of the subsidiary (fully integrated, autonomous) will also impact on risk.
Risk areas Key issues
Valuation of assets and liabilities These should be valued at fair value at the date of
acquisition in accordance with IFRS 13.
Valuation of consideration This should be at fair value and will include any
contingent consideration. Any deferred
consideration should be discounted.
Goodwill This must be calculated and accounted for in
accordance with IFRS 3.
Date of control The results of any subsidiary should only be
accounted for from the date of acquisition.

lOMoARcPSD|38463810
CFAP 6
Audit Focus
Level of control or influence This will determine the nature of the investment and
its subsequent treatment in the group financial
statements eg, subsidiary, associate and should be
determined in accordance with IFRS 10/IAS 28 (IFRS
10 retains control as the key concept underlying the
parent/subsidiary relationship but has broadened
the definition and clarified the application).
Accounting policies/reporting periods Accounting policies and reporting periods must be
consistent across the group.
Consolidation adjustments The group must have systems which enable the
identification of intra-group balances and accounts
Adequacy of provisions in the target While the acquirer is likely to know its plans, other
company provisions may be necessary within the acquired
entity.
If such provisions are currently unrecognized and
have never been recorded (eg, in board minutes),
there is a clear risk that the acquiring entity will
overpay
Use of provisions to manipulate post Provisions may be recognised at the point of
acquisition profits acquisition and then released at some point in the
future in order to make post-change results appear
impressive. This may imply that change was a
correct business decision. The use of such provisions
has been reduced by IAS 37
AUDIT PROCEDURES
`The diagram below summarises the key points in the context of the group audit.
Figure: Audit procedures
Potential misstatement in group accounts Factors affecting risk of material misstatement

due to in subsidiary financial statements
 Misclassification of investments (subsidiary  Scope of component auditors' work (may not
vs associate vs financial asset) provide sufficient appropriate evidence that

lOMoARcPSD|38463810
CFAP 6
Audit Focus
 Inappropriate inclusion, or exclusion from, financial statements are free from material
consolidation or incorrect treatment of misstatement)
excluded subsidiaries  Past audit problems
 Inappropriate consolidation method  Anticipated changes
 Inappropriate translation method for  Materiality
overseas subsidiaries  Sufficiency of evidence to confirm amounts
 Incorrect consolidation adjustments eg,  Overseas subsidiaries (see section 12.8)
failure to eliminate intra-group items  Non-coterminous year ends
properly eg, leading to potential  Existence of letter of comfort (see section 12.9)
overstatements of assets and profits
 Inconsistent accounting policies for
amounts included in consolidation
 Incorrect calculation (fair values) or
treatment of goodwill
 Incorrect calculation of profit/loss on
disposal or classification of results of
subsidiaries disposed of (continuing vs
discontinued)
 Incorrect determination of date of
acquisition
 Deferred or contingent consideration; step
acquisition
Acquisition
If the group audit includes a newly acquired subsidiary or a subsidiary which is disposed of,
compliance with IFRS 3 and IFRS 10 will be relevant. The auditor will need to consider the following
issues in particular
Issue Audit consequence
Level of control The auditor will need to consider whether the
appropriate accounting treatment has been adopted
depending on the level of control (per IFRS 10 an
investor controls an investee if it has power over the
investee, exposure or rights to variable returns and the
ability to use power to affect returns). Procedures will
be as follows:
 Identify total number of shares held to calculate %
holding.
 Review contract or agreements between companies
to identify key terms which may indicate control

lOMoARcPSD|38463810
CFAP 6
Audit Focus
and any restriction on control eg, right of veto of
third parties.
Date of control/change in stake The auditor should:
 Review purchase agreement to identify date of
control.
 Ensure consolidation has occurred from date
control achieved.
 Review consolidation schedules to ensure amounts
have been time apportioned if appropriate.
Valuation of assets and liabilities at fair A review will need to be carried out of the fair value
value of assets and liabilities at the date of acquisition,
adjusted to the year end (in accordance with IFRS 13).
Review of trade journals or specialist valuations may
be required. Where specialist valuers have been used
(eg, to value brands) an assessment will need to be
made on the reliability of these valuations. Where
intangibles have been recognized on consolidation
which were not previously recognised in the individual
financial statements of the company acquired the
auditor will need to give careful consideration as to
the justification of this and whether the treatment is
in accordance with IFRS 3/IFRS 13.
Estimates for provisions existing at the date of
acquisition will need to be assessed for reliability.
Valuation of consideration Contingent consideration should be included as part
of the consideration transferred. It must be measured
at fair value at the acquisition date.
The discount rate used to discount deferred
consideration should be validated
Goodwill The auditor will need to consider whether the initial
calculation is correct in accordance with IFRS 3.
Performance of the subsidiary company will need to
be reviewed to identify whether any impairment is
necessary
Tax liabilities and assets The amount of corporation tax liabilities provided for
will need to be reviewed
Deferred tax assets and liabilities must also be
reviewed. The impairment of assets or goodwill should
be taken into account

lOMoARcPSD|38463810
CFAP 6
Audit Focus
Prior year audit of subsidiary As first year of inclusion of subsidiary, review last
year's audit report for any modification and consider
implications for this year's audit if necessary.
Planning issues Adjust audit plan to ensure visit to subsidiary is
included. If audited by another auditor contact
secondary auditor to discuss the following:
 Audit deadline
 Type and quality of audit papers
 Review of audit
 Identification of consolidation adjustments.
Disposal
Where the group includes a subsidiary which has been disposed of during the year, the following
issues will be relevant:
 Identification of the date of the change in stake
 Assessment of the remaining stake to determine the appropriate accounting treatment post
disposal
 Assessment of the fair value of the remaining stake
 Whether the profit or loss on disposal has been calculated in accordance with IFRSs
 Whether amounts have been appropriately time apportioned eg, income and expense items.
Auditing an ongoing group of companies

Certain issues will be relevant to the auditor each year irrespective of whether there is any change
in the structure of the group. In particular, the auditor will need to ensure that IFRS 10 has been
complied with. The following will be relevant.
Issue Audit consequence
Accounting policies/reporting period Identify subsidiary's accounting policies from
review of financial statements, compare to parent
company's and adjust for consistency where
necessary.
Further adjustments may be required if some group

companies prepare financial statements in
accordance with IFRSs and others in accordance
with UK GAAP.
Ensure that subsidiary's reporting period is

consistent with the parent company's or that
interim accounts have been prepared where

lOMoARcPSD|38463810
CFAP 6
Audit Focus
necessary. (If not possible subsidiary's accounts may
still be used for consolidation provided that the gap
between the reporting dates is three months or less.)
Consolidation adjustments Review consolidation schedules, purchase, sales
ledger and intra-group accounts to identify any
intra-group transactions or outstanding balances,
ensure these have been cancelled out in the group
accounts.
Transactions involving group companies
Transactions involving group companies should be
audited in the same way as other transactions with
third parties. However, systems should exist to
ensure all intra-group transactions are separately
identified to ensure they are all appropriately
eliminated on consolidation.
Intra-group balances
These should be audited in the same way as
balances with third parties. In particular:
 share certificates should be examined;
 dividends should be verified;
 intra-group balances should be verified
including any security attaching thereto;
 carrying amounts should be assessed in the
same way as third-party investments; and
 the need for transfer pricing adjustments
assessed.
Intercompany guarantees
Any intercompany guarantees (eg, as surety for
external loans) should be ascertained and
consideration given to whether disclosure as a
contingent liability is required.
THE CONSOLIDATION: AUDIT PROCEDURES

After receiving and reviewing all the subsidiaries' (and associates') financial statements, the group
auditors will be in a position to audit the consolidated financial statements. The ICAEW Audit and
Assurance faculty booklet Auditing in a Group Context: Practical Considerations for Auditors warns
against treating the consolidation as simply an arithmetical exercise. It indicates that there are risks
inherent in the consolidation process itself, for example:

lOMoARcPSD|38463810
CFAP 6
Audit Focus
 Consolidation adjustments are a major source of journal entries therefore procedures relating to
the detection of fraud may be relevant.
 Risks may arise from incomplete information to support adjustments between accounting
frameworks.
An important part of the work on the consolidation will be checking the consolidation adjustments.
Consolidation adjustments generally fall into two categories:
 Permanent consolidation adjustments
 Consolidation adjustments for the current year
The audit steps involved in the consolidation process may be summarised as follows.
Step 1
Compare the audited accounts of each subsidiary/associate to the consolidation schedules to ensure
figures have been transposed correctly.
Step 2
Review the adjustments made on consolidation to ensure they are appropriate and comparable with
the previous year. This will involve the following:
 Recording the dates and costs of acquisitions of subsidiaries and the assets acquired
 Calculating goodwill and pre-acquisition reserves arising on consolidation
 Preparing an overall reconciliation of movements on reserves and NCIs
 Adjusting the individual subsidiary financial statements for differences in accounting policies
compared to the parent. This may include compliance with the accounting regulations of a
different jurisdiction (eg, where the individual subsidiary is UK GAAP compliant and the group
reports under IFRSs)
Step 3
For business combinations, determine the following:
 Whether combination has been appropriately treated as an acquisition
 The appropriateness of the date used as the date of combination
 The treatment of the results of investments acquired during the year
 If acquisition accounting has been used, that the fair value of acquired assets and liabilities is
in accordance with IFRS 13
 Goodwill has been calculated correctly and impairment adjustment made if necessary
Step 4
For disposals:
 agree the date used as the date for disposal to sales documentation; and
 review management accounts to ascertain whether the results of the investment have been
included up to the date of disposal, and whether figures used are reasonable.

lOMoARcPSD|38463810
CFAP 6
Audit Focus
Step 5
Consider whether previous treatment of existing subsidiaries or associates is still correct
(consider level of influence, degree of support)
Step 6
Verify the arithmetical accuracy of the consolidation workings by recalculating them
Step 7
Review the consolidated accounts for compliance with the legislation, accounting standards and
other relevant regulations. Care will need to be taken in the following circumstances:
 Where group companies do not have coterminous accounting periods
 Where subsidiaries are not consolidated
 Where accounting policies of group members differ because foreign subsidiaries operate under
different rules, especially those located in developing countries
 Where elimination of intra-group balances, transactions and profits is required.
Other important areas include the following:

 Treatment of associates
 Treatment of goodwill and intangible assets
 Foreign currency translation
 Taxation and deferred tax
 Treatment of loss-making subsidiaries
 Treatment of restrictions on distribution of profits of a subsidiary
 Share options
Step 8
Review the consolidated accounts to confirm that they give a true and fair view in the
circumstances (including subsequent event reviews from all subsidiaries updated to date of audit
report on consolidated accounts).
The Audit and Assurance faculty document Auditing Groups: A Practical Guide also highlights the
importance of considering the process used to perform the consolidation process. Where
spreadsheets are used it is not enough to check the data that has been entered. Auditors also need
to check that the consolidation spreadsheets are actually working properly.
Overseas subsidiaries
The inclusion of one or more foreign subsidiaries within a group introduces additional risks,
including the following:
 Non-compliance with the accounting requirements of IAS 21
 Potential misstatement due to the effects of high inflation

lOMoARcPSD|38463810
CFAP 6
Audit Focus
 Possible difficulty in the parent being able to exercise control, for example due to political
instability
 Currency restrictions limiting payment of profits to the parent
 There may be threats to going concern due to economic and/or political instability
 Non-compliance with local taxes or misstatement of local tax liabilities. Audit procedures should
 Check that the balances of the subsidiary have been appropriately translated to the group
reporting currency:
– Assets and liabilities at the closing rate at the end of the reporting period
– Income and expenditure at the rate ruling at the transaction date. An average would be a
suitable alternative provided there have been no significant fluctuations
 Confirm consistency of treatment of the translation of equity (closing rate or historical rate)
 Check that the consolidation process has been performed correctly eg, elimination of intragroup
balances
 Check the basis of the calculation of the non-controlling interest
 Confirm that goodwill has been translated at the closing rate
 Check the disclosure of exchange differences as a separate component of equity
 Assess whether disclosure requirements of IAS 21 have been satisfied
 If the foreign operation is operating in a hyperinflationary economy confirm that the financial
statements have been adjusted under IAS 29, Financial Reporting in Hyperinflationary Economies
before they are translated and consolidated
 Involve a specialist tax audit team to review the calculation of tax balances against submitted
and draft tax returns.
PROMOTING BEST PRACTICE IN GROUP AUDITS

Understand group Understand the group structure and the nature of the components of the
management's group.
process and Consider whether to accept an engagement where the group auditor is
timetable to produce only directly responsible for a minority of the total group
consolidated Understand the accounting framework applicable to each component and
accounts any local statutory reporting requirements
Understand the component auditors – consider their qualifications,

independence and competence For unrelated auditors or related auditors
where the group auditor is unable to rely on common policies and
procedures, consider the following:
 Visiting the component auditor

lOMoARcPSD|38463810
CFAP 6
Audit Focus
 Requesting that the component auditor completes a questionnaire or
representation
 Obtaining confirmation from a relevant regulatory body
 Discussing the component auditor with colleagues from their own firm
For component auditors based overseas consider whether they have
enough knowledge and experience of ISAs
Design group audit Get involved early. Talk to group management while they are planning the
process to match consolidation
management's Draft instructions to component auditors allocating work and be clear as
process and to deadlines required
timetable Focus the group audit on high risk areas
Consider risks arising from the consolidation process itself:
 Consolidation adjustments
 Incomplete information to support adjustments between accounting
frameworks eg, where a subsidiary prepares its local accounts under US
GAAP and the parent is preparing IFRS financial statements Discuss fraud
with component auditors and consider the following:
 Business risks
 How and where the group financial statements may be susceptible to
material misstatement due to fraud or error
 How group management and component management could perpetrate
and conceal fraudulent financial reporting and how assets of the
components could be misappropriated
 Known factors affecting the group that may provide the incentive or
pressure for group or component management or others to commit
fraud or indicate a culture or environment that enables those people to
rationalize committing fraud
 The risk that group or component management may override controls
Understand internal control across the group:
 Request details of material weaknesses in internal controls identified by
component auditors
 Communicate material weaknesses in group-wide controls and
significant weaknesses in internal controls of components to group
management
Clearly communicate Explain the extent of the group auditors' involvement in the work of the
expectations and component auditors:
information required  Make it clear what the component auditors are being asked to perform
including timetable eg, a full audit, a review or work on specific balances or transactions.
 Clarify the timetable and format of reporting back

lOMoARcPSD|38463810
CFAP 6
Audit Focus
Review completed questionnaires and other deliverables from component
auditors carefully
Decide whether and when to visit component auditors and when to
request access to their working papers
Get group management to obtain the consent of subsidiary management
to communicate with the group auditor to deal with concerns about client
confidentiality and sensitivity
Consider whether holding discussions with or visiting component auditors
could deal with secrecy and data-protection issues
Obtain information There is often only a short time for group auditors to resolve any issues
early where arising from the report they receive from component auditors.
practicable
Request some information early, such as copies of management letter
points from component auditors carrying out planning and control testing
before the year end
Keep track of Where component auditors indicate up front that they will not be able to
whether reports have provide the information requested, consider alternatives rather than
been received and waiting until the sign-off deadline
respond to any issues Put in place a system to monitor responses to instructions and follow up
in a timely fashion on non-submission
Conclude on the The group auditors should be in a position to form their opinion on the
audit and consider group financial statements
possible The group auditors will consider the need for a group management letter
improvements for and reporting to those charged with governance of the group
the next year's Debrief the team and consider whether the process worked as well as it
process including could have done, along with any changes to future accounting and
management letter auditing requirements, and whether there are any issues that should be
issues communicated to management and those charged with governance, or
any changes to next year's audit strategy.

Cfap 6 Audit Procedures Fin Reporting

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Cfap 6 Audit Procedures Fin Reporting

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Cfap 6 Audit Procedures Fin Reporting

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

lOMoARcPSD|38463810

CFAP 6 - Audit Procedures (Fin. Reporting)

Audit and Assurance (Institute of Chartered Accountants of Pakistan)

Scan to open on Studocu

Studocu is not sponsored or endorsed by any college or university

AUDIT PROCEDURES (REPORTING)

Presentation and disclosure of segment information .............................................................................................. 3

Held for sale assets................................................................................................................................................................... 3

Audit procedures ....................................................................................................................................................................... 3

IAS 24 – Related Parties Disclosures .................................................................................................................. 5

Auditor Responsibilities .......................................................................................................................................................... 5

IFRS 15 – Revenue from Contracts with Customers .....................................................................................11

Audit procedures for testing IFRS 15 ............................................................................................................................ 11

IAS 40 – Investment Properties ........................................................................................................................14

Audit evidence ......................................................................................................................................................................... 14

Auditing provisions and contingencies ........................................................................................................................ 16

Procedures regarding litigation and claims ............................................................................................................... 17

Procedures regarding events after the reporting period .................................................................................... 18

IFRS 16 – Leases ...................................................................................................................................................19

IFRS 09, IFRS 07, IAS 32: Financial Instruments ............................................................................................21

Audit issues around fair value .......................................................................................................................................... 21

Risk assessment ....................................................................................................................................................................... 21

Auditing financial instruments .......................................................................................................................................... 24

Auditing derivatives ............................................................................................................................................................... 32

IAS 19 – Employee benefits ...............................................................................................................................34

Auditing Evidence ................................................................................................................................................................... 34

IFRS 2 – Share-based payment .........................................................................................................................36

From the desk of Hasnain R. Badami, ACA (TSB Education) Page 1 of 50

Downloaded by Muhammad Nauman Ali ([email protected])

Audit Evidence ......................................................................................................................................................................... 36

IAS 21 and 29 – Foreign currency translation and hyperinflation .............................................................37

Audit procedures .................................................................................................................................................................... 37

IAS 12 – Income Taxes ........................................................................................................................................38

Current tax: audit procedures ........................................................................................................................................... 38

Deferred tax: audit procedures ........................................................................................................................................ 39

Groups: types of investment and business combination .............................................................................40

Planning and risk assessment as group auditor ...................................................................................................... 40

Risk assessment procedures .............................................................................................................................................. 40

Audit procedures .................................................................................................................................................................... 41

The consolidation: audit procedures ............................................................................................................................. 45

Promoting best practice in group audits .................................................................................................................... 48

From the desk of Hasnain R. Badami, ACA (TSB Education) Page 2 of 50

Downloaded by Muhammad Nauman Ali ([email protected])

IFRS 5 – NON-CURRENT ASSETS HELD FOR SALE AND DISCONTINUED

HELD FOR SALE ASSETS

From the desk of Hasnain R. Badami, ACA (TSB Education) Page 3 of 50

Downloaded by Muhammad Nauman Ali ([email protected])

From the desk of Hasnain R. Badami, ACA (TSB Education) Page 4 of 50

Downloaded by Muhammad Nauman Ali ([email protected])

IAS 24 – RELATED PARTIES DISCLOSURES

From the desk of Hasnain R. Badami, ACA (TSB Education) Page 5 of 50

Downloaded by Muhammad Nauman Ali ([email protected])

2.1 Risk assessment procedures

The auditor needs to perform the following procedures:

From the desk of Hasnain R. Badami, ACA (TSB Education) Page 6 of 50

Downloaded by Muhammad Nauman Ali ([email protected])

2.2 Responses to the risks of material misstatement

Identification of previously unidentified or undisclosed related parties or significant related