Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 6 views

    Ai Own

    Uploaded by

    Akshayasree
    The document discusses problems with representing uncertain knowledge using first-order logic. It provides several reasons why FOL struggles with uncertainty, such as its binary truth values, lack of probabilistic reasoning, and inability to represent vagueness. Alternative formalisms like probabilistic logic and Bayesian networks are needed to better model uncertainty by incorporating probabilities and degrees of belief.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Ai Own

    Uploaded by

    Akshayasree
    6 views6 pages
    The document discusses problems with representing uncertain knowledge using first-order logic. It provides several reasons why FOL struggles with uncertainty, such as its binary truth values, lack of probabilistic reasoning, and inability to represent vagueness. Alternative formalisms like probabilistic logic and Bayesian networks are needed to better model uncertainty by incorporating probabilities and degrees of belief.

    Original Title

    ai own

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document discusses problems with representing uncertain knowledge using first-order logic. It provides several reasons why FOL struggles with uncertainty, such as its binary truth values, lack of probabilistic reasoning, and inability to represent vagueness. Alternative formalisms like probabilistic logic and Bayesian networks are needed to better model uncertainty by incorporating probabilities and degrees of belief.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    6 views6 pages

    Ai Own

    Uploaded by

    Akshayasree
    The document discusses problems with representing uncertain knowledge using first-order logic. It provides several reasons why FOL struggles with uncertainty, such as its binary truth values, lack of probabilistic reasoning, and inability to represent vagueness. Alternative formalisms like probabilistic logic and Bayesian networks are needed to better model uncertainty by incorporating probabilities and degrees of belief.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 6

    1.

    “First order logic cannot cope with uncertain knowledge” Justify


    this statement

    ANS: First-order logic (FOL) is a powerful formalism for representing and


    reasoning about knowledge in a precise and unambiguous manner.
    However, it has limitations when it comes to handling uncertain or
    probabilistic information. Here are some reasons why first-order logic
    may struggle with uncertain knowledge:

    1. Binary Truth Values: In classical first-order logic, propositions are


    either true or false, and there is no inherent mechanism to express
    degrees of belief or uncertainty. This binary nature makes it
    difficult to model and reason about situations where information is
    incomplete or uncertain.
    2. Lack of Probabilistic Reasoning: First-order logic does not
    provide a framework for expressing or reasoning about
    probabilities. In contrast, uncertain knowledge often involves
    degrees of belief or confidence associated with different
    propositions. Probabilistic reasoning is essential for handling
    uncertainty in real-world scenarios.
    3. Open World Assumption: FOL operates under the "closed world
    assumption," which means that if a statement is not known to be
    true, it is considered false. In uncertain domains, however, it's often
    more realistic to adopt an "open world assumption,"
    acknowledging that the truth value of a statement may be
    unknown or uncertain.
    4. Inability to Capture Certinity(vagueness): FOL struggles with
    capturing vagueness or imprecision in natural language
    expressions. Uncertain knowledge may involve vague terms or
    fuzzy boundaries, which are challenging to represent and reason
    about in a strict logical framework.
    5. Difficulty in Handling Incomplete Information: Uncertain
    knowledge often involves incomplete information, and FOL is not
    well-suited to represent and reason about partial or missing
    information. This limitation makes it challenging to model
    situations where not all relevant facts are known.
    6. Complexity in Representing Belief Revision: In uncertain
    environments, beliefs may need to be revised based on new
    evidence. FOL lacks explicit mechanisms for representing and
    updating beliefs, making it less suitable for dynamic scenarios
    where knowledge evolves over time.

    To address these limitations, alternative formalisms such as probabilistic


    logic, fuzzy logic, and Bayesian networks have been developed. These
    frameworks provide richer ways to model and reason about uncertain
    knowledge by incorporating probabilities, degrees of belief, and other
    forms of uncertainty into the representation and inference processes.

    2.What are the problems with uncertainty? Explain with examples

    ANS: Uncertainty poses several challenges in various fields, and it can lead
    to difficulties in decision-making, planning, and problem-solving. Here are
    some problems associated with uncertainty, along with examples:

    1. Incomplete Information:
     Problem: In many situations, not all relevant information is
    available, leading to incomplete knowledge about the state of
    affairs.
     Example: Weather forecasting faces the challenge of
    incomplete information, where various factors influencing the
    weather are not precisely known, making accurate predictions
    difficult.
    2. Ambiguity:
     Problem: Ambiguity arises when information is not clear or has
    multiple interpretations, making it challenging to derive precise
    conclusions.
     Example: Natural language is inherently ambiguous. A
    statement like "the bank is on the river" can be interpreted in
    multiple ways, leading to uncertainty about the intended
    meaning.
    3. Imprecision:
     Problem: Imprecision refers to the lack of precision or
    granularity in information, making it challenging to define
    boundaries or make exact distinctions.
     Example: Temperature measurements with limited precision
    (e.g., rounding to the nearest degree) can introduce
    imprecision in scientific experiments or climate models.
    4. Probabilistic Uncertainty:
     Problem: Probabilistic uncertainty involves situations where
    outcomes are inherently uncertain and can be described in
    terms of probabilities.
     Example: In financial markets, predicting the future value of
    stocks involves probabilistic uncertainty, as it depends on
    various factors and is subject to market dynamics.
    5. Dynamic Changes:
     Problem: Situations where conditions change over time
    introduce dynamic uncertainty, making it challenging to predict
    future states accurately.
     Example: Traffic flow is dynamic, influenced by factors like
    accidents, weather, and construction. Predicting travel times
    becomes uncertain due to these changing conditions.
    6. Risk and Decision-Making:
     Problem: Decision-making under uncertainty involves
    assessing risks and making choices with incomplete or
    uncertain information.
     Example: Businesses deciding whether to invest in a new
    product face uncertainty regarding market demand,
    competition, and economic conditions, impacting the risk
    associated with the investment.
    7. Unexpected Events:
     Problem: Unexpected events, often referred to as black swan
    events, are events that are difficult to predict but can have
    significant consequences.
    Example: Natural disasters, such as earthquakes or hurricanes,
    are unpredictable events that introduce uncertainty in disaster
    preparedness and response planning.
    8. Incomplete Models:
     Problem: Models used to represent real-world phenomena
    may be incomplete, leading to uncertainty in predictions and
    outcomes.
     Example: Climate models may not capture all factors
    influencing climate change, leading to uncertainty in long-term
    predictions about temperature and sea-level rise.

    Addressing these problems requires the development of models and


    decision-making frameworks that explicitly account for uncertainty.
    Probabilistic models, fuzzy logic, and other uncertainty management
    techniques are employed in various domains to cope with the challenges
    posed by uncertain information.

    3.write an AI function that design a decision theoretic agent

    ANS: Probability provides a way of summarizing the uncertainty that comes


    from our laziness and ignorance.
    To make such choices, an agent must first have preferences between the
    different possible outcomes of the various plans.
    Preferences, as expressed by utilities, are combined with probabilities in the
    general theory of rationa1 decisions called decision theory:
    Decision theory = probability theory + utility theory.
    The fundamental idea of decision theory is that an agent is rational if and only
    if it chooses the action that yields the highest expected utility, averaged over all
    the possible outcomes of the action. This is called the principle of Maximum
    Expected Utility (MEU).
    function DT-AGENT(percept) returns an action
    persistent: belief_state, probabilistic beliefs about the current state of the world
    action, the agent's action
    update belief state based on action and percept calculate outcome probabilities for
    actions, given action descriptions and current belief_state
    select action with highest expected utility given probabilities of outcomes and
    utility information
    return action

    4. A doctor knows that the disease meningitis causes the patient to have a
    stiff neck, say, 70% of the time. The doctor also knows some unconditional
    facts: the prior probability that a patient has meningitis is 1/50,000, and the
    prior probability that any patient has a stiff neck is 1%. Find the probability of
    having meningitis given stiff neck.

    5. The medical domain consists of three variables Toothache, Catch and Cavity.
    The full joint distribution table is shown below. Clearly explain the process.

    Explain the following terms. 3) Prior probability b) probability distribution c)


    joint probability distribution d) full joint probability distribution

    ANS: The unconditional or prior probability associated with a proposition a is


    the degree of belief accorded to it in the absence of any other information; it is
    written as P (a). For example, if the prior probability that I have a cavity is 0.1,
    then we would write
    P (Cavity = true) = 0.1 or P (cavity) = 0.1.
    Ex: P (Weather = sunny) = 0.7
    P (Weather = rain) = 0.2
    P (Weather = cloudy) = 0.08
    P (Weather = snow) = 0.02.
    We may simply write
    P (Weather) = (0.7, 0.2, 0.08, 0.02).

    Probability Distribution:

     A probability distribution describes how the probability of a random variable


    or event is spread across all possible values.
     In AI, probability distributions are fundamental for modeling uncertainty.
    Common examples include the normal distribution, binomial distribution, and
    Poisson distribution. Probability distributions are used in various machine
    learning algorithms, such as those based on probabilistic graphical models.

    c) Joint Probability Distribution:

     The joint probability distribution of two or more random variables represents


    the probability of all possible combinations of their values.
     For example, if you have two random variables X and Y, the joint probability
    distribution P(X, Y) provides the probabilities for each pair of values (x, y). In
    AI, this is used in various applications, including Bayesian networks, where
    understanding the joint distribution helps model dependencies between
    variables.

    d) Full Joint Probability Distribution:

     The full joint probability distribution refers to the joint probabilities of all
    variables in a system.
     In AI, especially in probabilistic graphical models, obtaining the full joint
    probability distribution may become computationally challenging as the
    number of variables increases. Often, techniques like factorization or
    approximation are used to make computations more tractable.

    You might also like