AS CDLamb A18
AS CDLamb A18
AS CDLamb A18
1
Corrosion Detection with Guided Waves
Table of Contents
1. Guided Waves and EMAT ...................................................................................................................... 3
2. Equipment Options ................................................................................................................................ 4
2.1. Instrumentation .............................................................................................................................. 4
2.2. Magnets & Sensors ....................................................................................................................... 4
2.3. Accessories ................................................................................................................................... 5
3. Configuration, Setup, and Operation ...................................................................................................... 6
3.1. Innerspec PowerBox H Equipment Configuration ........................................................................... 6
3.1.1. XXL & Large Magnet Placement .............................................................................................. 7
3.2. Setup............................................................................................................................................. 7
3.2.1. Mode Selection........................................................................................................................ 7
3.2.2. Coil, Tuning Module, and Setup File Guide .............................................................................. 8
3.2.3. Large Magnet .......................................................................................................................... 9
3.2.4. XXL Magnet .......................................................................................................................... 10
3.3. Operation .................................................................................................................................... 12
3.3.1. Axial Scanning Technique ..................................................................................................... 12
3.3.2. Attenuation Mode (Axial Scanning) ........................................................................................ 13
3.3.3. Encoded Line Scans.............................................................................................................. 14
4. Troubleshooting ................................................................................................................................... 15
4.1. General ....................................................................................................................................... 15
4.1.1. Problem - Unusual Main Bang Signal..................................................................................... 15
4.1.2. Problem - No Signal Measurement ........................................................................................ 16
4.2. Axial Scanner .............................................................................................................................. 17
4.2.1. Reference Scan..................................................................................................................... 17
5. Manufacturer Recommendations.......................................................................................................... 18
5.1. Wave Mode Characteristics ......................................................................................................... 18
5.2. Wave Mode Selection Factors ..................................................................................................... 18
5.3. Dispersion Curves ....................................................................................................................... 19
5.4. Modes of Operation ..................................................................................................................... 22
5.4.1. Attenuation Mode .................................................................................................................. 22
5.5. Signal Verification ........................................................................................................................ 22
5.6. Gain Setting................................................................................................................................. 23
5.7. Inspection Technique ................................................................................................................... 23
America Europe
Innerspec Technologies, Inc. Innerspec Technologies Europe, S.L.
2940 Perrowville Road Pol. Industrial Prado Concejil
Forest, VA. 24551 USA Calle Sanglas 13
Tel: +1.434.948.1301 28890 Loeches (Madrid) Spain
Fax: +1.434.948.1313 Tel: +34.911.337.024
Fax: +34.911.881.344
Introduction
• Guided Wave Testing is a Non-Destructive Testing
technique method that employs ultrasonic stress
waves that propagate along a structure while guided
by its boundaries. Guided waves permit covering
long distances from a single point with a limited
number of sensors, making it very effective for rapid
scanning of pipelines and tanks.
• On relatively thin structures, it is possible to
generate volumetric guided waves that fill up the
material and permit a complete, volumetric
inspection. The most common types of volumetric
waves are Shear Horizontal (SH) and Lamb. This
Application Sheet covers the inspection with EMAT-
generated Lamb waves.
• Lamb waves travel throughout the material with both
vertical and forward motion in an elliptical pattern.
These waves are dispersive by nature, and very
sensitive to thickness variations. They can be
classified in symmetric (a.k.a. longitudinal) and
asymmetric (a.k.a. flexural) modes. The introduction of boundary conditions makes Lamb wave problems inherently
more difficult than the more conventional bulk waves. Unlike the finite number of modes present in a bulk wave
problem, there are an infinite number of modes associated with a given Lamb wave application. That is, a finite body
can support an infinite number of different Lamb wave mode modes.
• Guided waves can be used to cover distances ranging from a few millimeters to tens of meters. The two most
common techniques for in-service inspections with guided waves are Long Range UT (LRUT) and Medium Range UT
(MRUT). This application covers exclusively MRUT:
o LRUT. Used almost exclusively for pipeline inspection in reflection mode to cover long distances (tens of
meters) from a fixed ring of sensors. It normally works with low frequencies (sub-100kHz). Typical detection
capabilities are 10% of cross-sectional wall loss.
o MRUT used in both attenuation and reflection mode to cover shorter distances (0.1-5m). The sensors are
mounted on scanners to inspect long stretches of pipe or tanks. It typically works with frequencies from
100kHz to 1MHz, and can detect small pits (x10 more sensitivity than LRUT).
Characteristics
• Direction of Propagation: Parallel to the entry wall, within the top and bottom walls.
• Sensor Configuration: Pulse-Echo or Pitch-Catch.
• Wave modes: Lamb waves 50kHz to 10MHz.
• Materials Inspected: Ferromagnetic and non-ferromagnetic metals.
Applications
• Corrosion detection on materials <1” or 25.4mm thick. Thicker materials can be inspected with a significant
decrease in performance.
EMAT Uniqueness
• Dry and non-contact (up to 2.5mm lift-off depending on frequency and type of application).
• Not affected by surface conditions. Capable of inspecting on rough and through thin coatings.
• Less sensitive to sensor positioning and angle.
• Very good frequency selectivity due to its meander-coil design and tone-burst excitation. This permits greater
versatility in choosing the most appropriate mode for the application.
3
Corrosion Detection with Guided Waves
2. Equipment Options
2.1. Instrumentation
* Innerspec PowerBox H with Innerspec Technologies Open Platform (ITOP) software that supports a variety of different
applications. Hand-Held and battery operated for spot measurements and manual scanning.
For detailed Technical Specifications for this instrument, visit our website or contact Innerspec Technologies.
Innerspec offers the MRUT-Lamb scanners with either XXL or Large permanent magnets to generate Lamb waves in the
material being inspected.
XXL (274A0093-M00)
6.5” (165mm)
5.78” (147mm)
5” (127mm)
Large (274A0244)
19” (482.6mm)
(Long Arm Dimension)
3.93” (100mm) 1.65” (42mm)
1.63” (46.5mm)
Figure 1
4
Corrosion Detection with Guided Waves
Innerspec offers customers a variety of manually operated EMAT scanners. These devices can be used as a diagnostic
tool to quickly inspect for defects. These systems are configured to operate in both axial and circumferential
configurations, as need dictates.
Scanning
Part Number System Name Operation Mode Magnet Options Instrument
Configuration
MRUT-Lamb
Innerspec
800A0163 Hand Held Manual Axial Permanent
PowerBox H
Scanner XXL
MRUT-Lamb
Innerspec
800A0243 Hand Held Manual Axial Permanent
PowerBox H
Scanner Large
MRUT-C
Innerspec
280A0384 Hand Held Manual Circumferential Permanent
PowerBox H
Scanner
MRUT
Innerspec
800A0354 Rail Head Manual Axial Permanent
PowerBox H
Scanner
MRUT
Innerspec
800A0355 Lamp Post Manual Circumferential Permanent
PowerBox H
Scanner
2.4. Accessories
Innerspec Technologies offers a wide variety of sensors and accessories to fit our users’ specific application needs. We
have a catalog filled with sensor fixtures, encoders, signal conditioning boxes and thermocouples all designed to expand
the capability of our EMAT systems. To see a list of all our sensors and accessories please visit our website to view or
download the PDF to your device.
5
Corrosion Detection with Guided Waves
Lemo Cable
Tuning Module
Signal Conditioner
Lemo Cable
Lemo Cable
Coil
Coil
PowerBox H Foam
274A0244 Sensor
274A0093-M00 Sensor
Figure 2
6
Corrosion Detection with Guided Waves
The magnet must be placed at a height which allows moving the scanner smoothly while making sure that the coil is in
contact with the surface of the part to be inspected. For the XXL magnets, the black lever has two different functions: one
is used to vary the height and the other to engage/disengage the magnet. The first method allows modifying the height of
the magnet in the trolley by rotating the black lever clockwise or counter clockwise. Once the height is selected, pulling
the lever will engage the magnet to the inspection position or disengage when inspection is complete.
3.2. Setup
Before inspecting in the field, a preliminary study is highly recommended to evaluate the sensitivity of the different
dispositions of the sensors, technique and wave modes on the same type of tube, with flaws of similar characteristics to
the ones that are required to be detected during the inspection. The reference sample should be as similar as possible to
the tube that will be inspected in future steps, taking into account the thickness of the painting layers, state of the surface
or the level of corrosion.
In the absence of a reference tube to evaluate, the following recommendations and mode selection table can be used as
a guide for mode selection. Start by using the A0 mode, as it is easier to induce and to interpret. If it is suspected that the
sensitivity is too low, the inspection could be performed again using a S1 mode at a higher frequency. When using this S1
mode, there is a high chance of detecting the first wrap-around echo and, from that point, having different mode
conversions that make the interpretation more difficult. If, on the contrary, the A0 mode is too unstable, the S0 mode can
be used with a lower frequency, although having less sensitivity.
Note Regarding Paint: The main effect of the presence of paintings will be the amount of lift-off, which will result in
having a lower signal as you have more lift-off. If the loss of signal is too severe it will be necessary to increase the gain of
the system. By doing this, the noise level and undesired responses could also increase. The main problem with paint is
the consistency of its thickness over the tube, as it will cause a variable lift-off. For this last situation, the S1 mode is not
recommended, and if A0 is too affected by this factor, S0 would be plan B.
7
Corrosion Detection with Guided Waves
The Innerspec MRUT Hand-Held Scanner provides Axial scanning for inspection of pipes and plates using guided
waves.
Selection of appropriate mode for the thickness using dispersion curves. Innerspec has developed software that
generates dispersion curves and suggests the most appropriate mode and coil for a particular application (Guided Wave
Analysis Tool or GWAT).
Selection of coil and tuning module based on the wavelength and frequency suggested by GWAT.
Adjustment of the instrument based on the frequency selected and velocity of the particular mode.
In this Application Sheet we have selected coils, sensors and tuning module for thicknesses ranging from 0.08” to 0.5”
(2mm-13mm) for carbon steel. The tuning modules are selected for PN 274A0244 magnet for thicknesses ranging from
0.08” to 0.19” (2mm-5mm). Magnet XXL PN 274A0093-M00 is used for thicknesses ranging from 0.23” to 0.78” (4mm-
20mm). The setup file names have the following information.
CD_A0_T02_0.080_865kHz
Frequency
Wavelength in Inches
Thickness
Lamb Wave Mode
Application
Figure 3
For each thickness, the applicable setup files have been generated for A0, S0, and S1 modes. If a mode is not listed for a
thickness, it is either not available or not recommended.
8
Corrosion Detection with Guided Waves
The following are the recommended coils, setup files, and tuning modules for pipe thicknesses from 2mm to 8mm.
Each setup can be used in Pitch-Catch (PC) or Pulse-Echo (PE) mode by using the corresponding tuning module.
In Pulse-Echo (PE) mode either transmit or receiver coil may be used, but the tuning module recommendations in
this application sheet are for using the receiver coil. See the Standard Sensors & Accessories catalog for
transmitter coil tuning module recommendations.
9
Corrosion Detection with Guided Waves
The following are the recommended coils, setup files, and tuning modules for pipe thicknesses from 4mm to 20mm.
Each setup can be used in Pitch-Catch (PC) or Pulse-Echo (PE) mode by using the corresponding tuning module.
In Pulse-Echo (PE) mode either transmit or receiver coil may be used, but the tuning module recommendations in
this application sheet are for using the receiver coil. See the Standard Sensors & Accessories catalog for
transmitter coil tuning module recommendations.
10
Corrosion Detection with Guided Waves
These files are valid for carbon steel only (use GWAT for other materials) and might need to be modified depending on
the environmental conditions of the inspection. The modifications can include:
See the Innerspec PowerBox H Manual for additional details on the operation of the equipment.
11
Corrosion Detection with Guided Waves
3.3. Operation
For Pitch-Catch (PC) operation both transmitter and receiver coils are needed. To optimize the amplitude and minimize
coil-wear when using the XXL magnets, turn on the system and lower the magnet/s using the cam-adjustment lever until
the coil is firmly pressed on the material and signal amplitude is maximized. Once the sensor is in full contact, slowly raise
the magnet with the lever until the signal is 90% of its maximum. Move the sensor with the scanner to confirm that it can
easily roll back and forth with consistent signal strength.
This system uses Lamb Wave Modes with permanent magnets. The guided wave attenuation technique is used to
inspect flat, convex (e.g. pipe ID) or concave surfaces (e.g. pipe OD). In Pitch-Catch configuration, sound is sent between
the transmit and receive sensors (2 paths on pipes). The shortest distance between the transmit and receive sensor is
referred to as the “Near Signal” on the A-Scan. The longer distance around the circumference between the transmit and
receive sensor is referred to as the “Far Signal” on the A-Scan (refer to Figure 5).
It is important to ensure that the diameter of the pipe and the connector arm between the sensors does NOT allow the
Transmit and Receive sensors to be positioned 180° apart. If the sensors are positioned in this way, the signal for both
paths will arrive at the same time on the A-scan and you will not be able to determine which signal is being attenuated.
As a general rule, sensitivity is high when using the attenuation technique, which can increase the chance of having false
positives, as any factor that is not a flaw, e.g. misalignment of the sensors or variable lift-off, may result in a loss of
amplitude on the received signal. When using two sensors, defects can be masked just below the probes. For this
reason, it is recommended to do two passes with a 45º degree separation between them.
12
Corrosion Detection with Guided Waves
13
Corrosion Detection with Guided Waves
Near Signal
Far Signal
Figure 5: Sample Screen Showing Both A-Scan and Strip Chart Data
• If not already attached, mount encoder to the Large magnet. The Innerspec MRUT XXL Scanner has a built-in
encoder that can be attached to any of the body sections.
• Place sensor with encoder on the part to be inspected.
• Select View to display A Scan + Strip Chart or A scan + B scan.
• Select the appropriate setup for Pitch-Catch operation.
• Select DAQ tab and check “Trigger Source” to “Encoder”.
• Select “Axis1(X/Scan) and edit Start to “0”, Stop to “500” (length of scan in mm) and Pitch to “12” units (assuming the
units selected are mm). The encoder provides a pulse or tick every 0.25 mm, therefore a pitch of 12 implies that each
sample will be taken at 3mm intervals.
• The pitch of the encoder defines the distance between 2 samples or triggers generated by the external encoder. The
user is free to select any desired pitch suitable for the application.
14
Corrosion Detection with Guided Waves
• The encoder supplied by Innerspec Technologies is calibrated from the factory and no additional calibration is
required. This encoder is designed to provide a pulse tick every 0.235mm.
• For other encoders, follow this procedure:
o Press “0” beside “Set” button and Edit ENCODERS CAL Position to any value (e.g. 200 mm) and start
inspection. Pulsing will start as soon as the encoder starts moving. Confirm that the X-position display in the
status bar is 0.
o Move the encoder by the value chosen (e.g. 200 mm) and press “Set”. The reading below Set should display
0.xx mm/tick (User should know the distance per tick for the type of encoder used). It should not be a zero
value. If value is zero repeat the calibration process.
o Stop pulsing. The encoder is calibrated and is ready to scan.
• Start pulsing and wait for X-position display to go to 0 in the status bar. Normally a message will flash “Wait while
device is preparing for Scan”. After this message the device is ready for scanning.
• Move the sensor and encoder. The A-scan, Strip Chart or B Scan should update as the encoder moves forward.
• On Strip chart mode, moving forward will update new values, reversing the direction will repaint the trace backwards.
This feature is interesting if during scan a part of the sample wasn’t recorded correctly, or to confirm a response from
a certain area. Press stop when finished.
• The x-scan will be reset to 0 and will be treated as a new scan, every time pulsing stops.
4. Troubleshooting
4.1. General
A scan as pictured below could indicate that the T/R cable is either not plugged in or malfunctioning, or the signal
conditioning box is not properly seated.
4.1.1.1. Solution
Check all cable connections and ensure signal conditioner box is properly seated.
15
Corrosion Detection with Guided Waves
A scan with no main bang or receive signal as shown below could indicate that there is no impedance matching unit
installed or external signal conditioning is not enabled.
4.1.2.1. Solution
Ensure the tuning module in installed and seated properly and that “External Signal Conditioner” is checked on the TX/RX
tab.
16
Corrosion Detection with Guided Waves
A complete scan around a defect/target free pipe should look like the one pictured below when using the pitch-catch
attenuation technique. The scan below shows the main bang at the beginning followed by the direct transmission signal
and then the wrap around transmission signal.
17
Corrosion Detection with Guided Waves
5. Manufacturer Recommendations
The system is able to excite several points in the modes of the dispersion curves by a combination of coil and frequency.
Based on experience, delimited zones of the dispersion curves are used over three different modes: A0, S0 and S1.
Depending on the thickness of the tube the combination of coil and frequency is selected to excite certain points over these
modes. The table at the annex shows this information.
• A0: the easiest mode to excite obtaining the clearest echoes. The frequency of excitation is not generally very high, so
the sensitivity of this mode is not the best that can be achieved compared to other cases. Due to this, A0 is mainly
used to detect defective areas with medium/large discontinuities. Using this mode welds and welded supports can be
detected by reflections and, if the pipe contains liquids, the signal could be attenuated, but it is the most
recommended mode if the state of the surface of the part is not optimal or if it is generally corroded.
• S1: it generally requires more gain and wave mode A1 is often also present. The frequency of excitation is high, so it
is more sensitive to flaws than other modes, but it is also more affected by lift-off variations or other discontinuities
present in the tube. This mode is suggested when the part shows good surface conditions or does not show general
corrosion, as it will be able to detect defects with high sensitivity, although the interpretation of the results might be
more complex.
• S0: this wave mode uses a very low frequency, and will be considered for the inspection when A0 mode is unstable.
S0 is less affected by welds and possible attenuations that typically affect the A0 mode. On the other hand, as it is
excited at lower frequency, the sensitivity to defects is even lower. It generally has a large dead zone, so when using
one sensor with small diameter tubes the first wrap-around echo might be hidden by this area.
The following is a detailed explanation of each of the factors that may affect wave mode selection.
When the surface of the tube has irregularities, oxides or is eroded, the A0 mode is the recommended wave mode
to work with, as it is less affected by these factors. Due to the high sensitivity of the S1 mode, it is recommended
when inspecting tubes with good and consistent surface conditions.
Working with the attenuation mode, when having general corrosion on the tube there will be an homogeneous
reduction of the signal, showing amplitude variations if the selected wave mode is too sensitive, as S1 mode. To
avoid this behaviour, it is recommended to choose a less sensitive mode, A0 mode, taking into account its detection
limits.
18
Corrosion Detection with Guided Waves
The main effect of the presence of paintings will be the increment of the lift-off, which will result into having a lower
signal. If the loss of signal is too severe it will be necessary to increase the gain of the system. By doing this, the
noise level and undesired responses could be also intensified. However, the main problem of the paintings is the
heterogeneity of its thickness over the tube, as it will cause a variable lift-off. For this last situation, the S1 mode is
not recommended, and if A0 is too affected by this factor, S0 would be plan B.
In this scenario, asymmetric modes (A0) are more affected and signal attenuations may appear more frequently.
If this behaviour is detected, it is suggested to use S0 mode (S1 might be too sensitive and also affected by
liquids).
The following are the dispersion curves for all the setups in this Application Sheet.
Dispersion Curves for T/R-L-M-0.120x5-1.000 coil Dispersion Curves for T/R-L-M-0.160x5-1.000 coil
Dispersion Curves for T/R-L-M-0.200x4-1.000 coil Dispersion Curves for T/R-L-M-0.250x4-1.000 coil
19
Corrosion Detection with Guided Waves
Dispersion Curves for T/R-L-M-0.300x3-1.000 coil Dispersion Curves for T/R-ME-M-0.250x5-2.000 coil
Dispersion Curves for T/R-ME-M-0.300x4-2.000 coil Dispersion Curves for T/R-ME-M-0.400x4-2.000 coil
Dispersion Curves for T/R-ME-M-0.520x3-2.000 coil Dispersion Curves for T/R-ME-M-0.640x3-2.000 coil
20
Corrosion Detection with Guided Waves
Dispersion Curves for T/R-ME-M-0.720x2-2.000 coil Dispersion Curves for T/R-ME-M-0.800x-2.500 coil
Dispersion Curves for T/R-ME-M-0.880x2-2.500 coil Dispersion Curves for T/R-ME-M-0.960x2-2.800 coil
Dispersion Curves for T/R-ME-M-1.040x2-2.800 coil Dispersion Curves for T/R-ME-M-1.120x2-2.875 coil
21
Corrosion Detection with Guided Waves
This guided wave technique for corrosion detection supports one mode of operation:
This mode is used in Pitch-Catch configuration with one transmittal sensor and one receive sensor.
• A transmitter and a receiver are used to track the echoes received in a direct transmission “Near Signal” and wrap
around “Far Signal”.
• Corroded walls cause Time-Of-Flight shifts and decreases in amplitude.
• Time-Of-Flight shifts are caused by velocity changes when traveling through the thinner portion of the pipe.
• Decreases in amplitude are caused by energy loss reflected from corroded areas.
As a general rule, it is recommended to use only one sensor during the verification stage. Two sensors placed together
will be used when:
1. The dead zone caused by the main bang is excessively large. Generally, the lower the frequency is the larger the
dead zone will be. When transmitter and receiver are separated this area is decreased.
2. The noise level is too high. Separating transmitter and receiver will minimize the occurrence.
Short Path
Excessively Large Wrap Around Echo Reduced Main Bang Long Path
Main Bang
22
Corrosion Detection with Guided Waves
Gain should be adjusted on a section of the tube considered as non-defective. The amplitude of the wrap-around echo is
required to be adjusted over 90%, without being saturated. If the gain setting is done on a defective area, the effect on the
amplitude of the received echoes may be saturated, which could be misinterpreted that the section inspected is non-
defective. The gain should be readjusted in that zone and the inspection should be repeated.
It is recommended to perform two axial passes with a 45º degree spacing between them working with the attenuation
configuration. If a significant decrease of the signal is detected and repeatable in the same section, it is suggested to
change the scanning technique to a circumferential scan for verification. To verify, increase the gain to try to detect the
reflection from the defect and ensure that the reflection is present in the A and B scans. It is important to emphasize that
a lack of reflection does not imply the absence of a flaw, but a reflection does imply the presence of a discontinuity.
23