2013年12月六级考试真题(二)
2013年12月六级考试真题(二)
2013年12月六级考试真题(二)
PartⅠ Writing
Directions: For this part you are allowed 30 minutes to write an essay on happiness by referring to the saying
“Happiness is not the absence of problems, but the ability to deal with them.” You can cite examples to
illustrate your point and then explain how you can develop your ability to deal with problems and be
happy. You should write at least 150 words but no more than 200 words.
Section B
Directions: In this section, you will hear 3 short passages. At the end of each passage, you will hear some questions. Both
the passage and the questions will be spoken only once. After you hear a question, you must choose the
best answer from the four choices marked A), B), C) and D). Then mark the corresponding letter on
Answer Sheet 1 with a single line through the centre.
Passage One
Questions 16 to 18 are based on the passage you have just heard.
16. A) They have fallen prey to wolves.
B) They have become a tourist attraction.
C) They have caused lots of damage to crops.
D) They have become a headache to the community.
17. A) To celebrate their victory. C) To scare the wolves.
Passage Two
A) affiliated I) hazardous
B) attached J) improved
C) contact K) instantaneous
D) contend L) intrinsic
E) continuous M) relatively
F) diminish N) shift
G) endurance O) similarly
H) foster
Section B
Directions: In this section, you are going to read a passage with ten statements attached to it. Each statement contains
information given in one of the paragraphs. Identify the paragraph from which the information is derived.
You may choose a paragraph more than once. Each paragraph is marked with a letter. Answer the
questions by marking the corresponding letter on Answer Sheet 2.
46. Elimination of waste alone can potentially provide over sixty percent more food for the growing world population.
47. The production and application of fertilisers and pesticides account for the largest part of energy use in the modem
industrialised agricultural process.
48. Consumers in developed countries throw away nearly half of their food purchases because they tend to buy in
excessive quantities.
49. It is recommended that engineering knowledge and suitable technology in developed countries be introduced to
developing countries to improve produce handling in the harvest.
50. The predicted global population growth means that ways have to be found to produce more food with finite
resources.
51. A further expansion of farming area will adversely impact on the worlds natural ecosystems.
52. Perfectly eatable fruit and vegetable crops often fail to reach supermarkets due to their size or physical appearance.
53. Poor practices in harvesting, storage and transportation have resulted in a waste of much of the food we produce and
thus a waste of land and resources.
54. Food waste in less-developed countries happens mainly at the producers’ end.
Vernon Bowman, a 75-year-old farmer from rural Indiana, did something that got him sued. He planted soybeans
( 大 豆 ) sold as cattle feed. But Monsanto, the agricultural giant, insists it has a patent on the kind of genetically
modified seeds Bowman used — and that the patent continues to all of the progeny(后代)of those seeds.
Have we really gotten to the point that planting a seed can lead to a high-stakes Supreme Court patent lawsuit? We
have, and that case is Bowman vs. Monsanto, which is being argued on Tuesday. Monsanto’s critics have attacked the
company for its “merciless legal battles against small farmers,” and they are hoping this will be the case that puts it in its
place. They are also hoping the court’s ruling will rein in patent law, which is increasingly being used to claim new life
forms as private property.
Monsanto and its supporters, not surprisingly, see the case very differently. They argue that when a company like
Monsanto goes to great expense to create a valuable new genetically modified seed, it must be able to protect its property
interests. If farmers like Bowman are able to use these seeds without paying the designated fee, it will remove the
incentives for companies like Monsanto to innovate.
Monsanto accused Bowman of patent infringement and won an $84,456 damage award. Rather than pay up or work
out a settlement, Bowman decided to appeal — all the way to the Supreme Court. He said “Monsanto should not be able,
just because they’ve got billions of dollars to spend on legal fees, to try to terrify farmers into obeying their agreements by
massive force and threats.”
The central issue in the case is whether patent rights to living things extend to the progeny of those things. Monsanto
argues that its patents extend to later generations. But Bowman’s supporters argue that Monsanto is trying to expand the
scope of patents in ways that would enrich big corporations and hurt small farmers. They say that if Monsanto wins, the
impact will extend far beyond agriculture — locking up property rights in an array of important areas. Knowledge
Ecology International contends that the Supreme Court’s ruling could have “profound effects” on other biotech industries.
If this were a Hollywood movie, the courageous old Indiana farmer would beat the profit-minded corporation before
the credits rolled. But this is a real-life argument before a Supreme Court that has a well-earned reputation for looking out
for the interests of large corporations. This case gives the court an opportunity to rein in the growing use of patents to
protect genetically engineered crops and other life forms — but the court may well use it to give this trend a powerful new
endorsement.
61. Why did Vernon Bowman get sued?
A) He used genetically modified seeds to feed his cattle.
B) He planted soybeans without paying for the patent.
C) He made a profit out of Monsanto’s commercial secrets.
D) He obtained Monsanto’s patented seeds by illegal means.
62. What are Monsanto’s critics hoping the Supreme Court will do?
A) Allow small farmers to grow genetically modified soybeans.
B) Punish Monsanto for infringing on small farmer’s interests.
C) Rule against Monsanto’s excessive extension of its patent rights.
D) Abolish the patent law concerning genetically engineered seeds.
63. What is the argument of Monsanto and its supporters?
A) Patent rights should be protected to encourage innovation.
B) Bowman cannot plant the seeds without Monsanto’s consent.
C) Monsanto has the right to recover the costs of its patented seeds.
D) Patent law on genetically modified seeds should not be challenged.
64. What is the key issue in the Bowman vs. Monsanto case?
A) Whether patent for seeds is harmful to agricultural production.
B) Whether the biotech industry should take priority over agriculture.
C) Whether measures should be introduced to protect small farmers.
D) Whether patent for living things applies to their generations.
65. What do we learn from the last paragraph?
A) Hollywood movies usually have an unexpected, dramatic impact on real-life arguments.
B) The Supreme Court will try to change its reputation for supporting large corporations.
C) The Supreme Court is likely to persuade the parties concerned to work out a settlement.
D) The ruling would be in Bowman’s favor if the case were argued in a Hollywood movie.
Part Ⅳ Translation
Directions: For this part, you are allowed 30 minutes to translate a passage from Chinese into English. You should write
your answer on Answer Sheet 2.