Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 9 views

    Presentation Rubric1

    Uploaded by

    ponzquiapo0705
    This document contains a rubric for evaluating graduate student presentations. It provides scoring criteria in categories such as introduction, content, delivery, and use of visual aids. Presenters are scored on a scale from 1 to 5 in areas like establishing a framework, defining technical terms, maintaining eye contact, using clear audio, and presenting information within the assigned time limits. The overall goal is to assess how well students communicate their message and knowledge on the given topic.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Presentation Rubric1

    Uploaded by

    ponzquiapo0705
    9 views1 page
    This document contains a rubric for evaluating graduate student presentations. It provides scoring criteria in categories such as introduction, content, delivery, and use of visual aids. Presenters are scored on a scale from 1 to 5 in areas like establishing a framework, defining technical terms, maintaining eye contact, using clear audio, and presenting information within the assigned time limits. The overall goal is to assess how well students communicate their message and knowledge on the given topic.

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document contains a rubric for evaluating graduate student presentations. It provides scoring criteria in categories such as introduction, content, delivery, and use of visual aids. Presenters are scored on a scale from 1 to 5 in areas like establishing a framework, defining technical terms, maintaining eye contact, using clear audio, and presenting information within the assigned time limits. The overall goal is to assess how well students communicate their message and knowledge on the given topic.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    9 views1 page

    Presentation Rubric1

    Uploaded by

    ponzquiapo0705
    This document contains a rubric for evaluating graduate student presentations. It provides scoring criteria in categories such as introduction, content, delivery, and use of visual aids. Presenters are scored on a scale from 1 to 5 in areas like establishing a framework, defining technical terms, maintaining eye contact, using clear audio, and presenting information within the assigned time limits. The overall goal is to assess how well students communicate their message and knowledge on the given topic.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    You are on page 1of 1

    Rubric for Presentation: HST 5900 Graduate Project

    Name of Presenter:
    Name of Evaluator
    Date and Location: SCORE:
    Poor Excellent
    Category Scoring Criteria 60 70 80 90 100

    1 2 3 4 5
    Introduction is attention-getting, lays out the problem well, and establishes a Poor Excellent
    framework for the rest of the presentation.
    1 2 3 4 5
    Technical terms are well-defined in language appropriate for the target audience. Poor Excellent

    1 2 3 4 5
    Presentation contains accurate information. Poor Excellent

    1 2 3 4 5
    Content Material included is relevant to the overall message/purpose. Poor Excellent

    1 2 3 4 5
    Appropriate amount of material is prepared, and points made reflect well their Poor Excellent
    relative importance.
    1 2 3 4 5
    There is an obvious conclusion summarizing the presentation. Poor Excellent

    1 2 3 4 5
    Speaker maintains good eye contact with the audience and is appropriately Poor Excellent
    animated (e.g., gestures, movement, etc.).
    1 2 3 4 5
    Speaker uses a clear, audible voice. Poor Excellent

    1 2 3 4 5
    Delivery is poised, controlled, and smooth. Poor Excellent

    1 2 3 4 5
    Presentation Good language skills and pronunciation are used. Poor Excellent

    1 2 3 4 5
    Visual aids are well prepared, informative, effective, and not distracting. Poor Excellent

    1 2 3 4 5
    Length of presentation is within the assigned time limits. Poor Excellent

    1 2 3 4 5
    Information was well communicated. Poor Excellent

    1 2 3 4 5

    LEGEND SCORE / NO OF ITEMS = AVE

    You might also like