Argulosis 17 F 14
Argulosis 17 F 14
Argulosis 17 F 14
COLLEGE OF FISHERIES
Prevalence of Argulosis in Indian Major Carps in selected fish farms of Nagaon district of
Assam, India.
2. Introduction
One of the major problems of fish culture is the parasitic infestation and disease. Fish parasites
cause morbidity and mortalities of fishes in culture operations. They attack fishes and destroy
them or make wounds or disease on their flesh, thus making them inedible (Woo, 1999). Hence,
in order to control fish diseases caused by the parasites, it is essential to study their taxonomy
to identify them, their infestations, as well as their effect on hosts. Argulus is one of the
problems in fish culture practices in Assam. Fish farmers raise several complains to protect
their crop from Argulus both in nurseries and culture ponds. Argulus sp. belong to Sub-class:
Branchiura (meaning - Gill tails) of crustaceans. It is also called fish lice or common fish louse.
It causes the disease called argulosis in most of fishes. Argulus, the crustacean feeds by first
inserting a pre-oral sting which injects digestive enzymes into the body. They then suck out the
liquidated body fluids with their proboscis-like mouth. The various spines, suckers and hooks
that lice use for attachment may also cause additional tissue damage (Shimura and Inoue,
1984). In India, loss due to argulosis in freshwater aquaculture was estimated about US$ 615
(Rs.39,268.24) per hectare per year (Sahoo et al., 2012) which accounts nearly 30% to the net
profit per hectare per year.
Except some fragmentary reports, detailed information of argulosis from Assam is not
available. Hence, the research work is proposed to accomplish the following objectives.
3. Objectives
1
4. Review of literature
Das and Das (1997) reported Argulus foliaceus, Argulus bengalensis and Argulus siamensis
infesting Indian major carps L. rohita, C. mrigla and C. catla.
Padmavathi and Prasad (1998) studied on the control measures of argulosis using Nuvan and
Ekalux.
Ahmed (2004) worked for development of environment friendly measures for the treatment of
argulosis in carp brood ponds.
Taylor et al. (2005) reported that the parasites cause a reactive hyperplasia of the epithelium
and increased mucus production.
Kalita et al. (2009) reported the epidemiology of Argulus sp. infections in fish culture ponds in
Nagaon district. The infestation potential of Argulus foliaceus in cultured carp species varied
from 68.36% in Labeo rohita to 23.45% in Catla catla.
Kalita et al. (2010) reported frequent infection and occurrence of Argulus foliaceus in
freshwater ornamental goldfish, Carassius auratus in Assam. Argulus foliaceus was identified
by the size of their cephalothorax, with distinct thoracic areas and posterior lobes that do not
reach the base of the abdomen, and distinct lobes are separated by a clear cleft. Infected fishes
were lethargic, ceases feeding and loose condition. Attachment sites were moved with
haemorrhagic spots and was spread all over the body surface of the fish.
Al-Darwesh et al. (2014) reported focal deposition of melanocytes in the epidermal layer,
skeletal muscles, with edema and hyalinization affecting of skeletal bundles and degenerative
with necrotic changes in the epithelial cell and hyperplasia of fin filaments by histopathological
examination of Argulus japonicas in goldfish (Carassius auratus).
Kalita et al. (2019) reported the occurrence of Argulus throughout the year in Assam. The
incidences of EUS is highest followed by Argulus, Myxobolus and fin-rot.
2
5. Materials and Methods
3
5.5.Methodology for objective II:
Parasitic Prevalence Study: The parasitic prevalence will be calculated with the aid of
Parasitic Frequency Index (PFI, %), the formulae suggested and proposed by Margolis et
al. (1982).
No.of hosts infected
Prevalence (%) = ×100
No.of hosts examined
Srivastava (1980) suggested that the frequency index could be further classified into rare
(0.1-9.9%), occasional (10-29.9%), common (30-69.9%) and abundant (70-100%).
4
6. Expected Outcomes
• The predominant Argulus parasite is expected to be evaluated for the selected sites.
• Expected prevalence and frequency index of Argulus sp. will be estimated for different
months and seasons.
• Highly susceptible species for Argulus infectivity is expected to be evaluated among the
cultured species.
• Economical loss due to the Argulus infestation is expected to be assessed indicating the
impact on the income of the farmers, which is usually ignored by the farmers.
5
7. Reference:
Ahmed ATA (2004). Development of environment friendly measures for the treatment of
argulosis in carp brood pond. Bangladesh Journal of Fisheries 27: 3-9.
Al-Darwesh, A.A., Al-Shabbani, M.A.A. and Faris, B.H., 2014. Diagnostic and
pathological study of Argulus japonicas in goldfish (Carassius Auratus). Glob. J.
BioSci. Biotechnol, 3(4), pp.384-387.
Alom, M.Z., Yasmin, M.S. and Rahman, M.A., 2019. Status, occurrence, intensity and
impact of Argulosis in different brood stock ponds. MOJ Eco Environ Sci, 4(5),
pp.225-229.
Atallah, S., & El-Banna, S. (2005). Effect of fish diseases on economic and productive
efficiency of fish farms under Egyptian conditions. In 4th Int. sci. conf. (pp. 104).
Monsoura University.
Das MK and Das RK (1997). Fish and prawn Diseases in India. Diagnosis and control.
Inland Fisheries society of India, Barrackpore, West Bengal, India, pp. 139.
Kalita B, Sarmah TD, Hussain IA, Ali A, Dutta OK. Argulus Infestation in Freshwater
Fish Farms of Assam. In: K.K. Tamuli et al. (ed) Indigenous Finfish species for
Aquaculture diversification: Current status and prospects in North East Region.
Published by College of Fisheries, AAU, Raha, 2014, 194-202.
Kalita, B., Ali, A., Islam, S., Hussain, I.A. and Pokhrel, H., 2019. Incidence of fish diseases
in Assam.
Kalita, B., Tamuli, K.K., Baishya, S. and Dutta, O.K., 2010. Occurrence of parasites in
freshwater ornamental fishes in Assam. Environment and Ecology, 28(4), pp.2309-
2312.
Kalita, B., Tamuli, K.K., Bhagabati, S.K. and Dutta, O.K., 2009. Epidemiology of Argulus
sp. Infections in fish culture ponds in Nagaon district-a case study. Fish and
Fisheries in North East India-Recent Advances and Rebuilding. (Eds. RN Bhuyan,
D. Ghosh and D. Sarma). Geophil Publishing House, Guwahati, 283.
Margolis, L., Esch, G.W., Holmes, J.C., Kuris, A.M. and Schad, G., 1982. The use of
ecological terms in parasitology (report of an ad hoc committee of the American
Society of Parasitologists). The Journal of Parasitology, 68(1), pp.131-133.
Padmavathi P and Prasad MKD (1998). An effective and economically feasible treatment
of organophosphate pesticide and common salt to eradicate the fish ectoparasites,
Argulus japonicus Thiele in carp culture ponds. Journal of Environmental Biology
19: 193-203.
Roberts, R. J. (2001) Fish Pathology 3rd ed.,W.B. Saunders, An imprint of Harcourt
Publishers.
Sahoo, P.K., Mohanty, J., Garnayak, S.K., Mohanty, B.R., Kar, B., Prasanth, H. and Jena,
J.K., 2013. Estimation of loss due to argulosis in carp culture ponds in India. Indian
J Fish, 60(2), pp.99-102.
6
Shimura S and Inoue K (l984). Toxic effects of extract from the mouth parts of Argulus
coregoni Thorell (Crustacea: Branchiura). Bulletin of the Japanese Society of
Scientific Fisheries 50: 729.
Soota T. D. Collection and preservation of trematodes and cestodes. Proc. Workshop Tech.
Parasitol. Zool. Surv. India, 1980: 27-29.
Soulsby, E.J.L., 1982. Helminths. Arthropods and Protozoa of domesticated animals, 291.
Srivastava, C.B., 1980. Estimation of helminthic infections. In Proceedings Workshop
Technology Parasitol. Zoological Survey of India (pp. 29-31).
Taylor, N. G. H; Sommerville, C. and Wootten, R. (2005) A review of Argulus spp.
occurring in UK freshwaters. Journal of Fish Biology 11: 349.
Woo PTK (1999). Fish diseases and disorders (Eds. Vol. 1.). Protozoan and metazoan
infections. CABI Publishing. pp. 808.