Contract
Contract
Contract
Section 2(d) of the Indian Contract Act states that "when the promisor, promisee,
or any other person has done or abstained from doing or does or abstains from doing
or promises to do or abstain from doing something, such act, abstinence, or promise
is called a consideration for the promise."
Only the promisee should be considered in English law. Despite this, English law
has made an exception, requiring that the promisee and the other person sending the
consideration be related by blood. (Poole v. Dutton)
2. EXECUTED (PRESENT)CONSIDERATION :
The executed consideration, also known as the present consideration, is when the
parties have fulfilled their pledges.
In basic terms, the contracting parties fulfilled their contractual
responsibilities, and the contract's performance was finished; this is referred to
as an executed consideration.
Example: A purchases a pen for Rs. 20/- from a stationery store. A pays the shop
owner Rs. 20 in exchange for the pen. Both considerations have been finished.
Executed/present consideration is the term for this situation.
3. PAST CONSIDERATION :
With a general contract, consideration should be with the contract; however, in
past consideration, the act has already been done before making any promise, and
this is referred to as Past Consideration in contract law.
The previous consideration is no consideration, according to Anson, and therefore
is unenforceable in English law. As a result, in Common Law, prior consideration
has no value and is not good consideration.
For example, A found a pocketbook on the side of the road and searched for its
actual owner, B. B receives the purse from A. Then B rewards him with Rs. 500/-.
This is an example of past consideration.
In the scenario above, A acted freely and returned B's purse. This is a
consideration from the past.
• JUDGEMENT
The Court determined that the agreement authorising the transfer of the estate to
the respondent as a gift and the commitment to pay an annuity are both concurrent
agreements. As a result, each of these agreements will be treated as a single
transaction in light of the definition and explanation of compensation provided in
section 2(d) of the Indian Contract Act, 1872.
• DECISION / OUTCOME
Despite the fact that the wrappers had no intrinsic economic worth in and of
themselves, the House of Lords ruled that they were part of the consideration for
the sale of records. 'A contracting party can stipulate what consideration he
chooses,' Lord Somervell held (at 114). If it is determined that the promisee does
not like pepper and will toss away the corn, a peppercorn remains a good
consideration.'As a result, because the wrappers had no monetary value, the sale
was not covered by section 8 of the 1956 Act, and the Lords ruled in favour of the
defendants.