Lab 6 Pressure Vessel
Lab 6 Pressure Vessel
Lab 6 Pressure Vessel
Nick Leach
Group 3a
December 1, 2005
Schematic:
Analysis of Results:
• Data Reduction:
• Comparisons:
Gage 90 Gage 0 Gage -45 Gage -45 Gage 67.5 Gage -22.5 Gage 45 Gage 90
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Pressure (με) (με) (με) (με) (με) (με) (με) (με)
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
20 38 8 21 21 30 12 22 35
40 77 18 46 44 66 25 44 72
60 110 27 68 66 96 37 65 105
80 148 35 90 87 126 49 88 140
Strain
Gage
Sg 2.110+-0.5%
R 120+-0.3% Ω
Kt 0.2+-0.2%
Material
E 10.0 (10^6) psi
G 3.8 (10^6) psi
υ 0.33
Vessel
Diameter 3.5"
Thickness 0.0675"
160
140
120
100
Strain (με)
80
60
40
20
0
0 20 40 60 80 100
Pressure (psi)
• Conclusions:
As you can see by the graph, the data is perfectly linear for each loading, as
was expected. Notice that the slopes are different from each other except for the gage
at 90 degrees and the one at 45 degrees. This is simply because of the 45o turn of the
The theory of thin-walled pressure vessels is very accurate in that it can give a
strain measurement to a very specific value at any pressure within the boundaries of
the material, and do it at any arbitrary angle. I think that if the walls of the vessel
aren’t t<<D then the equations used would fail because there would be more distance
Longitudinal Hoop
Experimental Value (με) 35 148
Analytical Value (με) 35 173
Percent Diff. (%) 0 14.45
Some assumptions are made that control the accuracy of the experiment.
First of all, we have to assume that the vessel is homogenously manufactured: that
the material is exactly the same throughout. This is important because if the
material is made wrong, then it could give faulty results at one or more of the
gages. Second, we have to assume that the laboratory is controlled- that the
temperature is a constant 24o Celsius and that there are no large magnetic fields