Forging PDF
Forging PDF
Forging PDF
Equationo ofFlowCurvve
Ana
alysis
s of Forg
ging (a)Withsttrainhardening
Vo K(T )n
e.g. Vo 0 (T )0.3
1000
True stress and Trrue Strrain Here ı o iss flow stresss but it is truee stress and İ T is truestraain.
Th
he true strress is defiined as thee ratio of th
he load to the cross section are
ea at any (b)Withou
utstrainhard
dening:
lload V o V y
nstant. TT
in T 1 F
Instanta
aneous area
a
W
Where T annd F is thee engineering stress and
a engineeering strain
n respective
ely.
Trrue strain
L
Elongation
E dxx L¬ A ¬ d ¬
FT ¨ ln ln 1 F ln o 2 ln o
Instan
ntaneouslennght L x Lo ® A ® d ®
o
ng strain ( F ) = e FT -1
orr engineerin
h
h1
2L
2L1
B Wx
x
Forgingoccursinplassticzonei.einbetween V y and Vult (Vx+d Vx)
h x
V y –YieldStress x =0
V o – For forging,
f we need flow stress
s and fllow stress iss not constaant and depends on stress of the 2L
L Wx
P
workpiecee.
Vult –Ultimmatetensilestresshereneckformationstarts. x 0 , is the point at
a which thhe material does not move
m in any
y direction.
Take an element dxx at a distance of x (en
nlarged view
w):
2. Tresca’s Theory
y: V1 V3 V0
dV x d P 2P
0 (L x )
dx dxx
or P 2K . e h
.... (5) (Pressure
( d
distribution
n equation)
dVx d P
or ....(3) 2P
(L)
dx dxx At x = 0, Pmax K eh
2K
Condition-1: 2P
(0)
At x = L, Pmin K eh
2K 2K
dering sliding fric
Consid ction all over the
e surface ( Wx PP )
dx
PBd
W × Bdx
F = ǍN
N
or dF = ǍdN
Ǎ
Wx B dx P . PB dx
Wx PP
From equ
uation (1) and
a (3)
d V x 2W x
0
dx h
d P 2P P Elementa
al force, dF
F = P.B.dx
or 0 2P
(L x )
dx x h dF = 2K e h . B.dx
dP 2P
or ³ P h ³ dxx L 2P
. (L x ) § L L
·
Integratiing, F 2 u ³ (2 K . e h
. B . dx ) ¨¨' ³ gives half we use 2³ ¸¸
h portion F so for 2L w
2P 0 © 0 0 ¹
or ln P x C ......(4) L 2P
h (L x )
F 4 KB .³ e h . dx
0
Condition-2:
Consid
dering sticking frriction all over the surfac
ce ( Wx Wy K )
Shear faiilure will occur at each and everry point.
dVx 2Wx
For Slidiing Region: 0
dx h
Ps
K
....(9) or F 2u ³
0
®16.16
¯ 6
39.68 x ¾ 150 . dx 2 u ³ (2 u 4.04) e
¿ 39.68
6
150 . dx
P
510 kN 29.10 kN 539 kN (Von Mises)
At x xs ; P Ps
Vo K 3.5
2P
(L x s ) Applying Tresca’s Theory, K 3.5 N / mm2 ; Ps 14 N / mm2
Ps 2K e h 2 P 0.25
2P 39.68 2u0.25 48
K h
(L xs ) 2 u 3.5 ½ (48 x )
P
2K e F 2u
®14
¯
³ 6
(39.68 x ) ¾ 150 dx 2 ³ (2 u 3.5) e 6
¿
150 dx
or 0 39.68
1 2P
(L xs ) 442 kN 25 kN 467kN (Tresca ' s)
eh
or 2P
§ 1 · 2P Practice Problem-1
ln ¨ ¸ (L x s )
or © 2P ¹ h A strip of metal with initial dimensions 24 mm x 24 mm x 150 mm is forged between two
h § 1 · flat dies to a final size of 6 mm x 96 mm x 150 mm. If the coefficient of friction is 0.05,
. ln ¨ ¸ L xs
2P © 2P ¹
determine the maximum forging force. Take the average yield strength in tension is 7
h § 1 ·
xs L ln ¨ ¸ ....(10) (in any ques
stion first w
we find thiss xs )
2P © 2P ¹ N/mm2
Using this equation
n we can deecide the coondition of friction.
f
Given: 2L = 96 mm; L = 48 mm; h = 6 mm; B = 150 mm; P 0.05
Example 1: L = 50 mm, h = 10 mm & P 0.25
h § 1 ·
h § 1 · 10 § 1 · xs L ln K = 4.04 N/mm2
xs L ln
n¨ ¸ 50 ln
n¨ ¸ 36.13mm 2P ¨© 2P ¸¹
2P © 2P ¹ 2 u 0.25 © 2 u 0.25 ¹
xs 90.155 mm
0 to 36.13 mm stick
king and 36
6.13 mm to 50 mm slid
ding will ta
ake place.
Since xs came negative so there will be no sticking only sliding will take place.
L 2P
(L x )
F 4 KB ³ e h dx
0
48 °§ 2u0.05 · °½
®¨ ¸(48 x ) ¾
¯°© 6 ¹ ¿°
4 u 4.04 u 150 ³e
0
dx 177.98 kN
R
h1
VT dVT
VT
r VT drh
Vr
T
dT
VTdr.h sin dT 2 VTdr.h sin dT
2 2
For Axi--Symmetr
ry forging
r T
i.e. Vr V T
From aboove equatioon,
dT
( Vr d Vr ) ( r dr ) dT . h ( Vr . r dT . h ) 2 Wr . r dT . dr 2 Vr dr h . 0
2
§ d T dT ·
¨ U sin g : V T Vr ; sin | ¸
© 2 2 ¹
Vr d Vr ) (r dr ) . h ( Vr . rh) 2Wr . r dr Vr . dr
(V d .h 0
or
At r = R; Pmin V0
Here r = 0 means a point
V1 V3 V0
Vr P V0 ...(2)
or
2. Von Miscs
M Theo
ory:
V1 V2 )2 ( V2 V3 )2 ( V3 V1 )2
(V 2 V20
2 2 2
( Vr Vr ) ( Vr P) ( P Vr ) 2 V20 ding force
For find
or
2 ( Vr P)2 2 V20 Elementaal force (dF
F)
or
V P
r 0V ...(2)
or dr
On differrentiating; r R
d Vr d P
0
dr dr
d Vr dP
...(3)
dr dr Sr dr
dA = 2S
dF = d F P . 2Sr . drr
Condittion 1: 2P
(R r )
Consid
dering sliding
s f
friction all over
r the sur
rface ³dF ³V 0 .eh . 2Sr . dr
R 2P
Wr PP . (R r )
orr F 2SV0 ³ r.e h
dr
d P 2Wr
From (1) and (3); 0 0
dr h ª
R
2P
(R r ) § 2P
(R r ) ·º
dP PP «r . e h eh »
2. 0 orr F 2SV0 « ³ ¨¨1 . d ¸¸ »
dr
or dr h § 2P · § 2P ·
« ¨ ¸ ¨ ¨ ¸ ¸»
dP 2 P P ¬ © h ¹ © © h ¹ ¹¼ 0
R
or dr h ª 2P
(R r )
2P
(R r ) º
r.eh eh
dP 2P orr F 2SV0 « »
or « § 2P · P· »
2
³P ³
h
. dr
« ¨ ¸ §
¨
2
¸ »
«¬ © h ¹ © h ¹ ¼» 0
2P
ln P .r C ...(4) ª 2P
R º
h R 1 eh
At r = R; Vr 0 (becausse on this su
urface therre will be noo force) and
d Vr P V 0 ; P V0 orr F 2S V 0 « 0 »
« § 2P · 2 P
2
2 P
2 »
«¨ § · § · »
¸ ¨ ¸ ¨ ¸
2P . R «¬ © h ¹ © h ¹ © h ¹ ¼»
ln V0 C
or h
2K
C V0 R
h
IES–2007Conventional or
2K 2K
From (6) P . r V0 R
A cylinder of height 60 mm and diameter 100 mm is forged at room temperature between h h
two flat dies. Find the die load at the end of compression to a height 30 mm, using slab 2
2K
P V0 . (R r ) ...(7) Pressure Distribution
n linear
method of analysis. The yield strength of the work material is given as 120 N/mm2 and the h
or
coefficient of friction is 0.05. Assume that volume is constant after deformation. There is no
2K
sticking. Also find mean die pressure. [20-Marks] At r = 0; Pmax V0 .R
h
Solution: Given, h1 = 60 mm, d1 = 100 mm, h = 30 mm r = R; Pmin V0
V0 120 N/ mm 2 and P 0.05
S d12
h1 S R2 h
or 4
2
100
u 60 R2 u 30
or 4
or R = 70.7 mm
2P
ª .Rº
R 1 eh
F 2S V 0 « 0 » 2.04 MN
« § 2P · 2 2 »
«¨ § 2P · § 2P · »
¸ ¨ ¸ ¨ ¸
¬« © h ¹ © h ¹ © h ¹ »¼
Total force 2.04 u 106
Mean Die pressure = | 130 MPa
Total Area S u 70.72
For find
ding force:
GATE–2014(PI)
In an open die forging, a circular disc is gradually compressed between two r
flat platens. The exponential decay of normal stress on the flat face of the
disc, from the center of the disc towards its periphery, indicates that R
(a) there is no sticking friction anywhere on the flat face of the disc
(b) sticking friction and sliding friction co-exist on the flat face of the disc 2Srdr
surface
Wr K
From (1) equation (3)
d V r 2 Wr
0
dr h
d P 2K
0
or dr h
2K
or ³dP ³
h
. dr
2K
or P .r C ...(6)
h
At r = R; Vr 0 (because on this surface there will be no force) and Vr P V0 ; P V0
2K
V0 .RC
h
Condition 3: Rs R
h § K ·
ln ¨
When there is sticking and sliding both frictions occur © 2P P V0 ¸¹
or
According to Tresca’s theory
V0 K 1
K or
2 V0 2
g
di n
Sl i Sliding Rs R
h § 1 ·
ln ¨ ¸ ...(10)
2P © 2P ¹
ng
ki
ic Ps According to Von-Miscs Theory
St
Sticking V0 K 1
r = Rs K or
3 V0 3
h § 1 ·
Rs R ln ¨ ¸ ...(11)
2P © 3 P¹
IES–2006–Conventional
A certain disc of lead of radius 150 mm and thickness 50 mm is reduced to a thickness of 25
mm by open die forging. If the co-efficient of friction between the job and die is 0.25,
For sliding region pressure distribution is same as we derived in previous condition same
determine the maximum forging force. The average shear yield stress of lead can be taken
boundary condition same differential equation.
2P
(R r )
as 4 N/mm2 [10 – Marks]
P V0 . e h
Solution: R1 = 150 mm, h1 50 mm, R = ?, h = 25 mm, Ǎ= 0.25
K 2P
(R R s )
Ftotal ³ ®¯P
0
s
h
(R s r ) ¾ 2 Sr dr
¿ RS
³V 0 eh 2 Sr dr
V0 e h
§ K · 2P
Ftotal
¯
³
®16
25
(170.25 r ) ¾ 2 Sr dr ³ 4 3. e 25
¿
2 Sr dr
ln ¨ ¸ (R R s ) 0 170.25
die forging to a height of 50 mm. Coefficient of friction is 0.2 and flow curve equation is p 3Ke H FN and W P p,
V f 1030H 0.17 MPa . Calculate the maximum forging force. where p and W are the normal and shear stresses, respectively;
K is the shear yield strength of steel and r is the radial distance
Answer: of any point
Answer:
S RIN2 H IN 2
S RFN H FN
2 2
or 200 u 50 RFN u 30 RFN 258.2 mm
200
§ ·
and P 0.35 ¨1 e 258.2 ¸ 0.51
© ¹
Now at Rss
Shear stress in sticking K = shear stress in sliding P Pss
2P
RFN Rss
or K = P 3Ke H FN
§ 1 · 2P
or ln ¨ ¸ RFN Rss
© 3P ¹ H FN
H § 1 ·
or FN ln ¨ ¸ RFN Rss
2 P © 3P ¹
H § 1 · 30 § 1 ·
or Rss RFN FN ln ¨ ¸ 258.2 ln 254.55 mm
2P © 3P ¹ 2 u 0.51 ¨© 3 u 0.51 ¸¹
IFS-2012
Discuss Tresca and Von Mises yield criterion for metal forming operations. Also derive tensile and
shear yield stress relationships for their approaches. Which of this criterion is more realistic? Why?
[10 Marks]
Answer: Refer forging analysis