2010 10 01 Lect2
2010 10 01 Lect2
2010 10 01 Lect2
(This can be proved from the Theorem above, using the two example limits.)
Rational functions are functions given by a formula
p(x)
f (x) =
q(x)
where p(x) and q(x) are both polynomials and q(x) is not identically zero. So they are like
fractions of polynomials.
Rational functions are quite nice also. They may not make sense for all x ∈ R — we
have to avoid any x that makes the denominator q(x) = 0.
Limits of rational functions are not complicated (as long as we stay away from zeros of
the denominator).
p(x)
If f (x) = is a rational function and a ∈ R is a point where q(a) 6= 0, then
q(x)
p(x) limx→a p(x) p(a)
lim f (x) = lim = = = f (a)
x→a x→a q(x) limx→a q(x) q(a)
Sometimes rational functions can have limits at points where the denominator is 0. If
q(a) = 0, but p(a) 6= 0,
p(x)
lim
x→a q(x)
will not exist (at least not in the ordinary sense of finite limits). Reason: For x near a (but
x 6= a) q(x) will be close to q(a) = 0, but p(x) will be close to p(a). So p(x)/q(x) will be
very large in absolute value.
On the other hand, if p(a) = q(a) = 0, there is a chance that limx→a p(x) q(x)
exists.
In fact, there is a theorem called the Remainder Theorem that says:
MA1131 — Lecture 2 (1/10/2010) 8
Maybe an even clearer way to say it: If p(x) is a polynomial and p(a) = 0, then there
is another polynomial P (x) with
for each x.
So if p(a) = q(a) = 0, we can factor out x − a from each of p(x) and q(x) and rewrite
The fraction P (x)/Q(x) is ‘simpler’ than p(x)/q(x) and there is a chance that Q(a) 6= 0.
p(x) P (x)
Since f (x) = can be equally well written f (x) = for x 6= a, we have
q(x) Q(x)
p(x) P (x)
lim = lim
x→a q(x) x→a Q(x)
If P (a) = Q(a) = 0 we can divide out by x − a again, until we reach a fraction where
the numerator and denominator are not both 0 at x = a. We’ve discused that situation
just above.
2x2 − 3x + 6 x2 − 6x + 8
Exercises: Find lim √ and lim .
x→ 2 x2 + 2 x→2 x2 − 4
f (x) − f (a)
lim
x→a x−a
because it at least satisfies the first requirement: the quantity
f (x) − f (a)
x−a
makes sense for x near a on either side of a. So, there is at least a chance that the limit
exists.
MA1131 — Lecture 2 (1/10/2010) 9
Definition 3.1.1. If f (x) is defined on an open interval that includes a, then we say that
the function f (x) is differentiable at a if
f (x) − f (a)
lim
x→a x−a
exists (as a finite quantity). If the limit exists, we denote it by f 0 (a).
f (a + h) − f (a)
f 0 (a) = lim
h→0 h
(if the limit exists (and is finite)).
3.2 Interpretations/motivation
f (x) − f (a)
Notice that is the slope of the line joining the point (a, f (a)) on the graph of
x−a
f to the point (x, f (x)) — at least it is that as long as x 6= a.
In this picture a = 1 and x = 1.5 (or it could be the other way around a = 1.5 and x = 1).
From this point of view, as x approaches a (on either side of a, but we don’t allow
x = a), the chord seems to become closer and closer to being a tangent to the graph at the
point on the graph where x = a.
In fact, we turn the picture around and use it as a definition of a tangent line. We say
that
We can work out the equation and conclude that the tangent line to the graph y = f (x)
at the point where x = a is the line
y = f (a) + f 0 (a)(x − a)
f (x) − f (a)
lim = f 0 (a)
x→a x−a
f (x) − f (a)
lim − f 0 (a) = 0
x→a x−a
f (x) − f (a) − f 0 (a)(x − a)
lim =0
x→a x−a
0
f (x) − f (a) + f (a)(x − a)
lim =0
x→a x−a
What this tells us is that the discrepancy between the y-value y = f (x) of the point
(x, y) = (x, f (x)) on the actual graph and the y-coordinate of the point (x, f (a)+f 0 (a)(x −
a)) on the tangent line is