Handout On Bloom's Taxonomy
Handout On Bloom's Taxonomy
Handout On Bloom's Taxonomy
The course goals are broad statements of what the students will be able to do when they
have completed the course. Goals can be lofty ideas, using words or phrases like
"appreciates" or "shows leadership ability." Example of a broad course goal:
Students will be able to gain the knowledge of the liberation war of Bangladesh.
How can we measure, whether the person will be able to gain the knowledge of the
liberation war of Bangladesh or not? It would be very difficult. That is why we develop
objectives. The objectives are measurable and specific so we can determine if the goal was
achieved.
"The goal is where we want to be. The objectives are the steps needed to get there."
Measurable objectives are the specific measures we use to determine whether or not we are
successful in achieving the goal. The objectives are instructions about what we want the
student to be able to do. Use verbs and include specific outcomes which will be measurable.
It will describe to what degree the students will be able to demonstrate mastery of the task.
A simple example would be "Upon completion of the session the learner should be
able to write a paragraph on River".
5. Each objective should tag with an activity to assess the learners and the specific learning
outcomes.
Features of Objectives:
SMART objectives:
· S=Simple, Sensible, specific
· M=Measurable, Moderate, Manageable.
· A= Achievable, Attractive, Accurate, Appropriate, attainable
· R= Relevant, Realistic.
· T=Time framed, Time manageable.
Writing an Objective:
K- keep
I- it
S- short and
S- simple
Types of objectives:
Cognitive domain
The purpose of each domain is to impart knowledge. The learners should know some new
information at the end of this process. Here the teacher emphasis more on factual
knowledge.
Psychomotor domain
Some subjects are more overtly skills-based than others : that design and technology
lessons are more skills-related than English lesson.
Affective domain
Affective domain requires some change in attitudes. Learners’ gain confidence to response
cognitive domain.
Objectives must:
Be specific
Related to a part of the lesson
SMART
Complete the sentence
Factors influencing L. O.
The curriculum: what has to be taught?
The learners: age, ability range.
Special factors: is it exam. work?
Relationship of the lesson to previous/ future work.
Length of time available.
Handout on Bloom’s Taxonomy and Revised Taxonomy
Bloom's Taxonomy of Learning Domains
Bloom's Taxonomy was created in 1956 under the leadership of educational psychologist Dr
Benjamin Bloom in order to promote higher forms of thinking in education, such as analyzing
and evaluating concepts, processes, procedures, and principles, rather than just
remembering facts (rote learning). It is most often used when designing educational, training,
and learning processes.
The committee identified three domains of educational activities or learning (Bloom, et al.
1956):
Since the work was produced by higher education, the words tend to be a little bigger than
we normally use. Domains may be thought of as categories. Instructional designers, trainers,
and educators often refer to these three categories as KSA (Knowledge [cognitive], Skills
[psychomotor], and Attitudes [affective]). This taxonomy of learning behaviors may be
thought of as “the goals of the learning process.” That is, after a learning episode, the
learner should have acquired a new skill, knowledge, and/or attitude.
While the committee produced an elaborate compilation for the cognitive and affective
domains, they omitted the psychomotor domain. Their explanation for this oversight was that
Their compilation divides the three domains into subdivisions, starting from the simplest
cognitive process or behavior to the most complex. The divisions outlined are not absolutes
and there are other systems or hierarchies that have been devised, such as the Structure of
Observed Learning Outcome (SOLO). However, Bloom's taxonomy is easily understood and
is probably the most widely applied one in use today.
Cognitive Domain
The cognitive domain involves knowledge
and the development of intellectual skills
(Bloom, 1956). This includes the recall or
recognition of specific facts, procedural
patterns, and concepts that serve in the
development of intellectual abilities and
skills. There are six major categories of
cognitive an processes, starting from the
simplest to the most complex (see the table
below for an in-depth coverage of each
category):
Knowledge
Comprehension
Application
Analysis
Synthesis
Evaluation
The categories can be thought of as degrees of difficulties. That is, the first ones must
normally be mastered before the next one can take place.
changing the names in the six categories from noun to verb forms
rearranging them as shown in the chart below
creating a processes and levels of knowledge matrix
The chart shown below compares the original taxonomy with the revised one:
This new taxonomy reflects a more active form of thinking and is perhaps more accurate.
The new version of Bloom's Taxonomy, with examples and keywords is shown below:
Applying: Use a concept in a new situation Examples: Use a manual to calculate an employee's
or unprompted use of an abstraction. Applies vacation time. Apply laws of statistics to evaluate the
what was learned in the classroom into novel reliability of a written test.
situations in the work place.
Key Words: applies, changes, computes, constructs,
demonstrates, discovers, manipulates, modifies,
operates, predicts, prepares, produces, relates,
shows, solves, uses
Evaluating: Make judgments about the value Key Words: appraises, compares, concludes,
of ideas or materials. contrasts, criticizes, critiques, defends, describes,
discriminates, evaluates, explains, interprets, justifies,
relates, summarizes, supports
SAMPLE SAMPLE
LEVEL DEFINITION
VERBS BEHAVIORS
Student recalls or Write The student will
recognizes information, List define
ideas, and principles Label the 6 levels of
KNOWLEDGE
in the approximate Name Bloom's
form in which they State taxonomy of the
were learned. Define cognitive domain.
The student will
Student translates, Explain
explain
comprehends, or Summarize
the purpose of
COMPREHENSION interprets information Paraphrase
Bloom's
based on prior Describe
taxonomy of the
learning. Illustrate
cognitive domain.
Student selects, trans- Use The student will
fers, and uses data Compute write an
and principles to Solve instructional
APPLICATION
complete a problem Demonstrate objective for each
or task with a mini- Apply level of Bloom's
mum of direction. Construct taxonomy.
Student distinguishes,
Analyze The student will
classifies, and relates
Categorize compare and
the assumptions,
ANALYSIS Compare contrast
hypotheses, evidence,
Contrast the cognitive and
or structure of a
Separate affective domains.
statement or question.
The student will
design a
Student originates, classification
Create
integrates, and scheme for writing
Design
combines ideas into a educational
SYNTHESIS Hypothesize
product, plan or objectives
Invent
proposal that is new that combines the
Develop
to him or her. cognitive, affective,
and psychomotor
domains.
The student will
Student appraises, Judge
judge the effective-
assesses, or critiques Recommend
EVALUATION ness of writing
on a basis of specific Critique
objectives using
standards and criteria. Justify
Bloom's taxonomy.
1. Receive
1. Recall data 1. Imitation (copy)
(awareness)
3. Value
3. Apply (use) (understand and 3. Develop Precision
act)
4. Organise
4. Analyse 4. Articulation (combine,
personal value
(structure/elements) integrate related skills)
system
5. Internalize
5. Synthesize value system 5. Naturalization (automate,
(create/build) (adopt become expert)
behaviour)
6. Evaluate (assess,
judge in relational
terms)
Based on the 1956 work, The Handbook I-Cognitive Domain, behavioral objectives are
divided into subsets. These subsets were arranged into a taxonomy and listed according to
the cognitive difficulty, simpler to more complex forms. As stated earlier it has been
commonly known as Bloom’s Taxonomy since 1956. In 2000-01 revisions to this taxonomy
were spearheaded by one of Bloom’s former students, Lorin Anderson, and one of his
original partners in defining the cognitive domain, David Krathwohl. Please see my page
entitled Anderson and Krathwohl – Bloom’s Taxonomy Revised for further details.
Like cognitive objectives, affective objectives can also be divided into a hierarchy (according
to Krathwohl). This area is concerned with feelings or emotions. Again, the taxonomy is
arranged from simpler feelings to those that are more complex.
1. Receiving
This refers to the learner’s sensitivity to the existence of stimuli – awareness, willingness to
receive, or selected attention.
2. Responding
This refers to the learners’ active attention to stimuli and his/her motivation to learn –
acquiescence, willing responses, or feelings of satisfaction.
3. Valuing
This refers to the learner’s beliefs and attitudes of worth – acceptance, preference, or
commitment. An acceptance, preference, or commitment to a value.
4. Organization
This refers to the learner’s internalization of values and beliefs involving (1) the
conceptualization of values; and (2) the organization of a value system. As values or beliefs
become internalized, the leaner organizes them according to priority.
This refers to the learner’s highest of internalization and relates to behavior that reflects (1) a
generalized set of values; and (2) a characterization or a philosophy about life. At this level
the learner is capable of practicing and acting on their values or beliefs.
Note: As with all of the taxonomies, in labeling objectives using this domain there has to be
a very clear instructional intention for growth in this area specified in the learning
objective(s). Folks in the sciences and in math often avoid including affective objectives
stating that their areas are not emotional. However, any group work or cooperative exercise
where deportment or collaborative or cooperative skills are discussed, used, and
emphasized qualifies as having the potential for affective growth. Additionally, if students are
asked to challenge themselves with independently taking risks to develop and present a
hypothesis and/or persuade others on drawn conclusions, or actively take an intellectual risk
whereby they increase in self-confidence, these types of exercises also have the potential to
be affective as well as a cognitive. Also, in areas of potential debate, where data allows
students to draw conclusions about controversial topics or express opinions and feelings on
those topics, this too can be tweaked so there is intentional affective growth. Since emotion
draws both attention and channels strong residual memory, it behooves all dedicated and
artful educators to include affective objectives, no matter what their discipline or area of
study.
As stated earlier, to avoid confusion, if the activity is simply something that is physical which
supports another area — affective or cognitive — term the objective physical rather than
psychomotor. Again, this goes to instructional intent. A primary example of something
physical which supports specific cognitive development and skills might be looking through a
microscope and identifying and drawing cells. Here the instructional intent of this common
scientific activity is not to develop specific skilled proficiency in microscope viewing or in
reproducing cells through drawing. Usually the key intent in this activity is that a physical
action supports or is a vehicle for cognitive growth and furthering recognition skills. The
learner is using the physical action to achieve the cognitive objectives — identify, recognize,
and differentiate varied types of cells.
If you are using a physical activity to support a cognitive or affective function, simply label it
as something physical (labeling the objective as kinesthetic, haptic, or tactile is also
acceptable) and avoid the term psychomotor. Labeling something psychomotor means
there is a very clear educational intention for growth to occur in the psychomotor domain.
Certainly more complex learning objectives can be written so that they that meld 2 or 3
domains. For instance, students can gain appreciation (an affective objective) for the culture
or country of origin through conducting investigations or listening to stories while learning the
dances from other countries. Learning dance steps would fall under “skilled movements” in
the psychomotor domain.
Reflex movements
Objectives at this level include reflexes that involve one segmental or reflexes of the spine
and movements that may involve more than one segmented portion of the spine as
intersegmental reflexes (e.g., involuntary muscle contraction). These movements are
involuntary being either present at birth or emerging through maturation.
Fundamental movements
Objectives in this area refer to skills or movements or behaviors related to walking, running,
jumping, pushing, pulling and manipulating. They are often components for more complex
actions.
Perceptual abilities
Objectives in this area should address skills related to kinesthetic (bodily movements),
visual, auditory, tactile (touch), or coordination abilities as they are related to the ability to
take in information from the environment and react.
Physical abilities
Objectives in this area should be related to endurance, flexibility, agility, strength, reaction-
response time or dexterity.
Objectives in this area refer to skills and movements that must be learned for games, sports,
dances, performances, or for the arts.
Nondiscursive communication
Objectives in this area refer to expressive movements through posture, gestures, facial
expressions, and/or creative movements like those in mime or ballet. These movements
refer to interpretative movements that communicate meaning without the aid of verbal
commands or help.
Remember that the trick in effectively planning lessons — there has to be the
intention for growth specifically in the selected domain area! Learning takes place in
ALL 3 domains and wise teachers combine domains so that lessons and learning are
more holistic and multidimensional.
Ref:
http://www.nwlink.com/~donclark/hrd/bloom.html
http://thesecondprinciple.com/instructional-design/threedomainsoflearning/