Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 19 views

    CE 199 Form 5 A Rating System For Thesis Defense B 1

    Uploaded by

    mariequilaman
    This document contains a rating system for thesis defenses at the MSU-Iligan Institute of Technology Department of Civil Engineering and Technology. The rating system evaluates students on four criteria: significance/relevance of the thesis, literature/methodology, manuscript/organization, and oral presentation/delivery. Each criteria is worth a certain percentage of the overall rating. Committee members use the form to rate students on a scale of 0-100% for each criteria. The ratings are then weighted and combined to calculate an overall rating for the student's thesis defense performance.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    CE 199 Form 5 A Rating System For Thesis Defense B 1

    Uploaded by

    mariequilaman
    19 views2 pages
    This document contains a rating system for thesis defenses at the MSU-Iligan Institute of Technology Department of Civil Engineering and Technology. The rating system evaluates students on four criteria: significance/relevance of the thesis, literature/methodology, manuscript/organization, and oral presentation/delivery. Each criteria is worth a certain percentage of the overall rating. Committee members use the form to rate students on a scale of 0-100% for each criteria. The ratings are then weighted and combined to calculate an overall rating for the student's thesis defense performance.

    Original Description:

    Rating System for Thesis Defense

    Original Title

    CE 199 Form 5 a Rating System for Thesis Defense b 1

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document contains a rating system for thesis defenses at the MSU-Iligan Institute of Technology Department of Civil Engineering and Technology. The rating system evaluates students on four criteria: significance/relevance of the thesis, literature/methodology, manuscript/organization, and oral presentation/delivery. Each criteria is worth a certain percentage of the overall rating. Committee members use the form to rate students on a scale of 0-100% for each criteria. The ratings are then weighted and combined to calculate an overall rating for the student's thesis defense performance.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    19 views2 pages

    CE 199 Form 5 A Rating System For Thesis Defense B 1

    Uploaded by

    mariequilaman
    This document contains a rating system for thesis defenses at the MSU-Iligan Institute of Technology Department of Civil Engineering and Technology. The rating system evaluates students on four criteria: significance/relevance of the thesis, literature/methodology, manuscript/organization, and oral presentation/delivery. Each criteria is worth a certain percentage of the overall rating. Committee members use the form to rate students on a scale of 0-100% for each criteria. The ratings are then weighted and combined to calculate an overall rating for the student's thesis defense performance.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    of 2

    CET199 Form 5-A

    Department of Civil Engineering and Technology


    MSU-Iligan Institute of Technology

    Rating System for Thesis Defense

    Name of Student: _________________________________


    _________________________________
    _________________________________

    Title of Thesis:
    ___________________________________________________________
    ___________________________________________________________
    ____________________

    Date of Defense: _________________________________

    (This rating system aims to evaluate the performance of the student in all aspects of the execution of the
    thesis: to have ready data for the selection of awardee for Best Thesis, and to develop written and oral
    communication skills).

    Criteria/ Weight Rating Weighted


    (Scale of 0 to 100%, Rating (to be computed
    Passing is 75%, to be by adviser)
    rated by comm. member)

    Significance/Relevance (40%) _______________ _______________


    Contribution to Scientific Advancement;
    Relevance to Regional Thrusts;
    Objectives.
    Literature/Methodology (30%) _______________ _______________
    Extent of Literature Reviewed;
    Adequacy/Efficiency of Procedure;
    Innovativeness .
    Manuscript/Organization (15%) _______________ _______________

    Clarity and style; Cogency, Logic,


    Sequencing of Information;
    Completeness and Finality; Format.
    Oral Presentation/Delivery (15%) _______________ _______________
    Speaking Confidence; Adequacy of
    Vocabulary; Right Use of Words;
    Mastery of Subject Matter; Stage
    Presence, Response to Inquiries;
    Visual aids.
    Overall Rating = _______________

    ____________________________________
    Name and Signature of Committee Member
    Note:
     This form will be collected by the Thesis Adviser, for submission to the CE Department for filing.

    You might also like