GLOBALISATION Has Made The Planet More Equal
GLOBALISATION Has Made The Planet More Equal
GLOBALISATION Has Made The Planet More Equal
Usually, economists say no. Basic theory predicts that inequality falls when developing countries
enter global markets. The theory of comparative advantage is found in every introductory
textbook. It says that poor countries produce goods requiring large amounts of unskilled labour.
Rich countries focus on things requiring skilled workers. Thailand is a big rice exporter, for
example, while America is the world's largest exporter of financial services. As global trade
increases, the theory says, unskilled workers in poor countries are high in demand; skilled workers
in those same countries are less coveted. With more employers clamouring for their services,
unskilled workers in developing countries get wage boosts, whereas their skilled counterparts
don’t. The result is that inequality falls.
But the high inequality seen today in poor countries is prompting new theories. One emphasises
outsourcing—when rich countries shift parts of the production process to poor countries. Contrary
to popular belief, multinationals in poor countries often employ skilled workers and pay high
wages. One study showed that workers in foreign-owned and subcontracting clothing and
footwear factories in Vietnam rank in the top 20% of the country's population by household
expenditure. A report from the OECD found that average wages paid by foreign multinationals are
40% higher than wages paid by local firms. What is more, those skilled workers often get to work
with managers from rich countries, or might have to meet the deadlines of an efficient rich-world
company. That may boost their productivity. Higher productivity means they can demand even
higher wages. By contrast, unskilled workers, or poor ones in rural areas, tend not to have such
opportunities. Their productivity does not rise. For these reasons globalisation can boost the
wages of skilled workers, while crimping those of the unskilled. The result is that inequality rises.
Other economic theories try to explain why inequality in developing countries has such heights. A
Nobel laureate, Simon Kuznets, argued that growing inequality was inevitable in the early stages of
development. He reckoned that those who had a little bit of money to begin with could see big
gains from investment, and could thus benefit from growth, whereas those with nothing would
stay rooted in poverty. Only with economic development and demands for redistribution would
inequality fall. Indeed, recent evidence suggests that the growth in developing-country inequality
may now have slowed, which will prompt new questions for economists. But as things stand,
globalisation may struggle to promote equality within the world’s poorest countries.