Debate Speech ROTC
Debate Speech ROTC
Debate Speech ROTC
Ladies and gentlemen, esteemed judges, and respected opponents, a pleasant day to all of you.
Today, we stand before you to negate the proposition “Let it be resolved that the Philippines
shall implement Mandatory ROTC among senior high school students”. I am Brent Russell Dolor,
the non-necessity speaker of the negative side, together with Alexis Antolin as non-beneficiality
speaker and Allen Troy Martinez as the non-practicability speaker.
First, let me define what is mandatory, according to black’s law dictionary, mandatory is a term
used to order a person to do a particular action. While Reserved Officers Training Corps (ROTC)
is a military organization that prepares people to become officers in the armed forces and to
join a military operation if necessary.
As we delve into my actual argumentation, let me provide you a systematic overview of my
speech:
1. The pertinent issue on academic well-being and status of the Filipino students
2. Myopic interpretation of Military Capability and Strength
3. Forced patriotism
The Philippine education system grapples with a multitude of challenges, significantly impacting
students. Foremost among these issues is the dearth of resources and infrastructure,
particularly in rural schools. This pervasive problem afflicts a substantial portion of educational
institutions nationwide. According to the Department of Education’s report, approximately
5,000 schools in the Philippines lack access to clean drinking water. This absence of
fundamental amenities places both students and educators at a significant disadvantage,
detrimentally affecting the quality of education.
Furthermore, it’s important to consider the debate surrounding the revival of Mandatory ROTC
in the Philippines. While some argue that it can bolster a nation’s military strength and
capabilities, it’s worth noting that ROTC should remain a voluntary choice. For example,
Indonesia, ranked 15th globally in overall military power by the annual Global Firepower review,
achieves its strong military position without mandating military service or training like ROTC.
The key takeaway Is that the focus should be on improving military equipment and personnel to
enhance national defense against external threats, rather than simply increasing the number of
citizens in military service.
Additionally, mandating ROTC raises questions about forcing patriotism. Prominent figures, such
as Senator Bato Dela Rosa, Senator Robin Padilla, Vice President and DepEd Secretary Sara
Duterte, former President Rodrigo Duterte, and the current President Ferdinand Marcos Jr.,
have argued that Mandating ROTC can instill nationalism and patriotism. However, it’s crucial to
recognize that there are alternative ways to foster patriotism and civic duty, such as community
service or enhancing education in history, culture, and language.
No kind of nationalism is worth it when the government itself does not bother to improve the
country they claim to love, and forced patriotism is not patriotism.
In a nutshell, we firmly believe that ROTC effectively fulfills its mission, and it ardently pursues
its objectives. However, mandating its participation is not be the optimal solution to address the
educational challenges we currently face which also makes it unnecessary. After all, a true
patriot’s duty is to safeguard their country from potential government overreach. With that in
mind, I am not just proud but deeply honored to stand our ground. Thank you.