Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 9 views

    Gt. Aspihani

    Uploaded by

    herysuria81
    This document analyzes data on eating habits (pola makan) and anemia levels from a survey of 46 people. It finds that: 1) 45.7% had poor eating habits, 26.1% had sufficient habits, and 28.3% had good habits. 2) 52.2% of participants had anemia while 47.8% did not. 3) A chi-square test showed a significant relationship (p<0.001) between eating habits and anemia, with those having poor eating habits more likely to have anemia (90.5%).

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as RTF, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Gt. Aspihani

    Uploaded by

    herysuria81
    9 views2 pages
    This document analyzes data on eating habits (pola makan) and anemia levels from a survey of 46 people. It finds that: 1) 45.7% had poor eating habits, 26.1% had sufficient habits, and 28.3% had good habits. 2) 52.2% of participants had anemia while 47.8% did not. 3) A chi-square test showed a significant relationship (p<0.001) between eating habits and anemia, with those having poor eating habits more likely to have anemia (90.5%).

    Original Description:

    jfjt

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    RTF, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document analyzes data on eating habits (pola makan) and anemia levels from a survey of 46 people. It finds that: 1) 45.7% had poor eating habits, 26.1% had sufficient habits, and 28.3% had good habits. 2) 52.2% of participants had anemia while 47.8% did not. 3) A chi-square test showed a significant relationship (p<0.001) between eating habits and anemia, with those having poor eating habits more likely to have anemia (90.5%).

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as RTF, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as rtf, pdf, or txt
    9 views2 pages

    Gt. Aspihani

    Uploaded by

    herysuria81
    This document analyzes data on eating habits (pola makan) and anemia levels from a survey of 46 people. It finds that: 1) 45.7% had poor eating habits, 26.1% had sufficient habits, and 28.3% had good habits. 2) 52.2% of participants had anemia while 47.8% did not. 3) A chi-square test showed a significant relationship (p<0.001) between eating habits and anemia, with those having poor eating habits more likely to have anemia (90.5%).

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as RTF, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as rtf, pdf, or txt
    of 2

    Frequencies

    Frequency Table

    Pola_Makan
    Cumulative
    Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
    Valid Kurang 21 45,7 45,7 45,7
    Cukup 12 26,1 26,1 71,7
    Baik 13 28,3 28,3 100,0
    Total 46 100,0 100,0

    Anemia
    Cumulative
    Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
    Valid Anemia 24 52,2 52,2 52,2
    Tidak Anemia 22 47,8 47,8 100,0
    Total 46 100,0 100,0

    Crosstabs

    Pola_Makan * Anemia Crosstabulation


    Anemia
    Anemia Tidak Anemia Total
    Pola_Makan Kurang Count 19 2 21
    % within Pola_Makan 90,5% 9,5% 100,0%
    % of Total 41,3% 4,3% 45,7%
    Cukup Count 2 10 12
    % within Pola_Makan 16,7% 83,3% 100,0%
    % of Total 4,3% 21,7% 26,1%
    Baik Count 3 10 13
    % within Pola_Makan 23,1% 76,9% 100,0%
    % of Total 6,5% 21,7% 28,3%
    Total Count 24 22 46
    % within Pola_Makan 52,2% 47,8% 100,0%
    % of Total 52,2% 47,8% 100,0%

    Chi-Square Tests
    Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2-
    Value df sided) sided)
    Pearson Chi-Square 22,821a 2 ,000 ,000
    Likelihood Ratio 25,615 2 ,000 ,000
    Fisher's Exact Test 23,843 ,000
    Linear-by-Linear Association 16,815b 1 ,000 ,000
    N of Valid Cases 46
    a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 5,74.
    b. The standardized statistic is 4,101.

    Chi-Square Tests
    Exact Sig. (1-
    sided) Point Probability
    Pearson Chi-Square
    Likelihood Ratio
    Fisher's Exact Test
    Linear-by-Linear Association ,000 ,000
    N of Valid Cases

    Symmetric Measures
    Asymp. Std.
    Value Errora Approx. Tb
    Interval by Interval Pearson's R ,611 ,111 5,123
    Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation ,634 ,113 5,445
    N of Valid Cases 46
    a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.
    b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

    Symmetric Measures
    Approx. Sig. Exact Sig.
    Interval by Interval Pearson's R ,000c ,000
    Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation ,000c ,000
    N of Valid Cases
    c. Based on normal approximation.

    You might also like