This Content Downloaded From 93.156.218.154 On Thu, 20 Jul 2023 17:08:04 +00:00
This Content Downloaded From 93.156.218.154 On Thu, 20 Jul 2023 17:08:04 +00:00
This Content Downloaded From 93.156.218.154 On Thu, 20 Jul 2023 17:08:04 +00:00
Civil Rights Movement of the 1950s and 1960s and Their Portrayal in Modern Film
Author(s): Martha Lott
Source: Journal of Black Studies , MAY 2017, Vol. 48, No. 4 (MAY 2017), pp. 331-354
Published by: Sage Publications, Inc.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
Sage Publications, Inc. is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to
Journal of Black Studies
Martha Lott
Abstract
This research argues that the representation of African American women in
modern civil rights film is a result of the "invisibility" that they faced during
the civil rights movement in America during the 1950s and 1960s. To make its
argument, this article contends that the media's scant but negative coverage
of women activists along with male leaders, such as Malcolm X's attitude
toward African American women during the period of the movement, is the
reason why ultimately African American women activists received lack of
recognition for their involvement in the movement. This work also argues
that the lack of recognition for these women is evident in modern civil rights
film and they negatively portray African American women's role during the
movement. This is shown by examining two films—Selma and The Help. This
work also debates whether using film as a historical source is correct. This
work touches upon the ongoing stereotypical role of "Mammy" in films such
as The Help and argues that overall, by studying various arguments, and as
historian Peniel Joseph believes, that many prestigious movies take dramatic
license with historical events, arguing that films are not scholarly books and
people should not learn about historical events through films.
Corresponding Author:
Martha Lott, UK.
Email: [email protected]
Keywords
American Civil Rights Movement, American History, African American
Women's History
Introduction
This research will argue that the way African American women are repre
sented in modern film is a result of the "invisibility" that they faced during
the civil rights movement in America during the 1950s and 1960s. To make
its argument, this work will consider whether contemporary American film
reflects the ongoing anxieties and tensions of race, gender, and representation
that African American women faced during the civil rights movement. This
journal article will combine an examination of the civil rights movement with
(auto) biographical studies of the key women of the civil rights movement
alongside a focus on major civil rights films such as Selma (2015) Director
(Ava DuVernay) and The Help (2011) Director (Tate Taylor) in order to
examine their portrayal of African American women. Despite the key involve
ment of women in the movement, this research will show that modern film
still promotes a largely male vision of civil rights activists. This work will
also look at how "invisibility" becomes an issue for African American women
in American film in the sense that their contributions are not often recog
nized, and when they are, they rarely make it on to the "big-screen." After
surveying the scholarly literature around the topic, it is clear that there are
many arguments regarding African American women's involvement in the
civil rights movement. However, there is a lack of research undertaken by
scholars on African American women's representation in film on this subject.
This work will engage closely with the existing arguments on women's
involvement and, although sparse, the work on African American women's
representation in film. Charles Payne's (2007) work has led him to call the
civil rights movement "a woman's war" due to the African American wom
en's efforts during the movement (I've Got The Light of Freedom). According
to Payne (1990), "women canvassed more than men, showed up more often
at mass meetings and demonstrations and frequently attempted to register to
vote" (p.67)("Men Led but Women Organized"). Bernice Barnett (1993) also
contends that African American women suffered not only with the fight for
racial equality but from "The Triple Constraint" of racism, sexism and clas
sism (p. 162). However, LaVerne Gyant (1996) disagrees with Barnett in
"Passing the Torch: African American Women in the Civil Rights Movement"
(p. 629). Gyant (1996) argues that the "Triple Constraint" of race, gender, and
class faced by African American women during the civil rights movement
was not necessarily a bad thing. She contends that it empowered them to rise
above society's challenges and let them find freedom from racial oppression
(pp. 629-630). This research will disagree with Gyant's argument that the
"Triple Constraint" empowered women as they were fighting, sometimes
unknowingly, a larger battle and therefore this made the struggle harder. They
were fighting unknowingly, as Teresa A. Nance (1996) states in "Hearing the
Missing Voice," that regardless of the fact that male leaders in the civil rights
movement did not consider women as leaders, the women did not believe this
attitude to be sexist (p. 551). This article will work closely with the "Triple
Constraint" argument and apply it when relevant. Conversely, there is very
little research on African American women's representation in the civil rights
movement through the medium of film. The little research that does exist
refers to films of the 1980s and 1990s. This work will critically examine
contemporary films (21st century) in order to understand whether certain
gender biases in the portrayal of these women still exist. Historian Peniel
Joseph's "'Selma' Offers a Window Into the Civil Rights Movement" argues
that Selma (2015) director Ava DuVernay wisely chooses to ignore the stereo
types of presenting the film solely focusing on Martin Luther King Jr. and his
efforts during the movement. "'Selma' Offers a Window Into the Civil Rights
Movement" shows how DuVernay's film portrays the civil rights movement
in a historically accurate way, including mainly the African American women
organizers who were the backbone of the movement, but received limited
national media attention. Joseph states how the unlikely popular involvement
of African American women characters such as Annie Lee Cooper, Amelia
Boynton, and Diane Nash corrects many people's ideas that the civil rights
movement was led by solely men. This research will take this argument and
disagree as Jesse McCarthy (2015) argues that Selma director DuVernay
misses an opportunity to evoke a women's empowerment history. This work
will agree by stating that the representation of African American activists in
the civil rights movement in modern film is still overshadowed by the male
leaders and does not truly represent women's efforts in a historically accurate
way. On the contrary, the Association of Black Women Historians argue that
The Help (2011) is an "unacceptable" example of how Hollywood films can
"strip black women's lives of historical accuracy" in order to make an award
winning film. Their statement read, "Despite efforts to market the book and
the film as a progressive story of triumph over racial injustice, The Help dis
torts, ignores, and trivializes the experiences of black domestic workers"
(Association of Black Women Historians, 2011). This work will work closely
with this statement and add to this argument by suggesting that films such as
The Help focus solely on the White protagonists of the civil rights movement
when in reality it was organized and led by African American women and
men. However, Amy Curtis (2011) in her review of The Help disagrees with
during this time. In May 2009, the U.S. Congress authorized a national initia
tive by passing The Civil Rights History Project Act of 2009, which meant
that the Library of Congress and the Smithsonian Institution's National
Museum of African American History and Culture had the opportunity to
record new interviews with people who had participated in the struggle. One
of the interviews features SNCC (Student Nonviolent Coordinating
Committee) member Gwendolyn Zoharah Simmons where she talks of the
"Triple Constraint" she faced within the SNCC. She notes that "one of the
things that we often don't talk about," is that many women within the SNCC
committees faced sexual harassment (Civil Rights History Project, 2016).
Civil rights films have missed the opportunity to portray this aspect of African
American women's experiences during the movement. For example, The
Help refuses to touch upon Minny Jackson's (who was played by Octavia
Spencer) abusive husband, something that will be expanded on within
Chapter 2. It is argued that modern civil rights films not acknowledging this
aspect of African American women's lives is a result of the lack of awareness
of sexual harassment and domestic abuse that was so prominent during the
movement. Conversely, Derby also claims that she always did what she
wanted to do due to the "inner drive" she had. LaVerne Gyant (1996) argues
that the "Triple Constraint" was not necessarily a negative. She contends that
it empowered women to rise above society's challenges and let them find
freedom from racial oppression. This is evident when Derby states that "if
somebody had XYZ skills, and somebody only had ABC, we had to come
together. We used to joke about that, but in reality, the women, you know,
were strong. In the struggle, the women were strong" (Civil Rights History
Project, 2016). Overall, it is argued that the "Triple Constraint" is partially
responsible for the absence of recognition these women faced. Like Derby,
many other African American women fought the oppression they faced from
the "Triple Constraint" and lack of recognition. Diane Judith Nash was not
only a co founder of the SNCC but she was also one of the most respected
student leaders of the successful sit-in movement in Nashville, eventually
integrating lunch counters. In an interview in 1988 at Trinity College, Nash
explains to the audience, in order to raise awareness of the lack of recognition
her and many other African American women activists faced during the fight,
how she used nonviolence to overcome the oppression that came with the
"Triple Constraint."
It is argued that the women were well aware of their oppression, however, as
Teresa A. Nance (1996) argues in "Hearing the Missing Voice," that regard
less of the fact that male leaders in the civil rights movement did not consider
women as leaders, the women did not believe this attitude to be sexist (p.
551). Despite the fact that these women knew they were facing the "Triple
Constraint," or that this empowered them to rise above society's challenges,
it cannot be denied that the "Triple Constraint" was a major factor behind the
lack of recognition of their effort. Nash continues to argue that if one with
draws oneself from a system of oppression, then nonviolent activists would
no longer see themselves as victims, therefore putting them in "positions of
power" (p. 551). Nash also raises the argument that an essential principle to
the philosophy was to recognize "oppression always requires the participa
tion of the oppressed."
So that rather than doing harm to the oppressor, another way to go is to identify
your part in your own oppression, and then withdraw your cooperation from
the system of oppression and guarantee if the oppressed withdraw their
cooperation from their own oppression, the system of oppression cannot work,
(p. 551)
The argument can be suggested that Nash's theory of the African American
women removing themselves from the system of oppression could essentially
lead to African American women activists being treated equally to their male
counterparts, therefore receiving recognition for their contribution to the
movement. However, there are problems with using personal testimonies to
recreate the past. Nash's statement was made in 1988 during a talk at Trinity
College and with hindsight, Nash's theory did not work as she and many
other African American women suffered in silence throughout the civil rights
movement. Barnett contends that research, which has solely focused on "elite
male professionals within the black community," has made the "invisibility"
of black women in the civil rights movement worse. Nance offers a different
argument as to why the "invisibility" of African American women has
increased. She believes it is down to the male leaders' attitudes toward
African American women. In a report created by Nash from September 17 to
20, 1963 which accounts for her activity while she attended the funerals of
the deceased in the Birmingham church bombings, it is made clear that she
was more dedicated than her male counterparts in getting an agenda created
for Montgomery. The report shows of her meeting with Reverend
Shuttlesworth and how he rejects her proposal to take direct action in
Montgomery. After the funeral for the three young girls, people started to
march without a leader, and Nash became aware of the danger this could
cause due to her nonviolent approach to activism, and began to break up the
crowd. Nash (1963) argues that the energy among the crowd of students
wanting to take action "... could have been channeled into a constructive,
disciplined soul force at creatively using this energy to achieve a concrete
gain instead of just suppressing it." She continues,
The second Negro began to beat and I began to work my feet, and the State
Highway Patrolman ordered the first Negro who had beat me to sit on my
feet—to keep me from working my feet. I began to scream and one white man
got up and began to beat me in my head and tell me to hush. (Civil Rights
Movement Veterans, 1964)
This shows how the oppressor, usually racism or sexism, in this instance the
authorities, used the "Triple Constraint" against African American women
who wanted to better their lives. As Hamer (1964) stated, "All of this on
account of we want to register, to become first-class citizens." However, the
problem with using personal testimony to reconstruct the past is that it could
be biased as the focus is just on the individual being oppressed. This is why
it is essential to look at other factors such as the male view of women and the
role of the media.
Activist at the time Pauli Murray was disturbed that African American
women, who he knew had played a fundamental part in the civil rights move
ment, were not seen by the public or by Black male leadership as leaders or
policy makers.
One thing is perfectly clear. The Negro woman can no longer postpone or
subordinate the fight against discrimination because of sex to the Civil Rights
struggle but must carry on both fights simultaneously. She must insist upon a
partnership role in the integration . .. (Baldwin & Dekar, 2013, p. 77)
He also believed many male civil rights leaders "harbored medieval atti
tudes toward women" (p. 77). This can be seen when studying Malcolm X's
attitude toward African American women. As Clenora Hudson-Weems
(1993) argues, his attitude changed drastically as he grew spiritually and
politically (p. 27). For example, when Malcolm joined the NOI (Nation of
Islam) when the civil rights movement was in full swing, he held a misogy
nistic view of African American women. As stated in his autobiography, he
demonstrated abusive tendencies and believed women were frail and weak
and held the view that they loved exploitation (Haley, 1964, pp. 164-165).
If the male leaders of the civil rights movement who were constantly in the
public eye held these views about African American women, there is no
wonder why these women remained "invisible" to the public. However,
William Sales (1994) notes that Malcolm X's, now El-Hajj Malik
El-Shabazz, attitude toward African American women progressively shifted
(p. 15). Malcolm's new found yearning to protect African American women
stemmed from a genuine fear for their emotional and physical well-being.
As Farah Jasmine Griffin (2001) argues, "... it was also reflective of the
power struggle between black and white men and black men and women,"
where she states the relationship as "the woman gets protection; the man
acquires a possession" (p. 216). With Malcolm's declaration to "protect"
African American women, it is difficult to ignore the connection to "owner
ship." While in the hands of a "protector," a woman is open to further
oppression. The attitude of the males in the civil rights movement toward
the women was ultimately a major reason why African American women's
efforts went unnoticed.
The Media
The Help looks at the civil rights movement through the use of African
American women as maids. African American women activists' characters in
films, such as Diane Nash's portrayal which was briefly mentioned in Chapter
1, have been grotesquely distorted in films such as Selma (2015). By using
these two films as case studies, this section will argue that modern civil rights
films do not offer an accurate portrayal of the representation of African
American women activists. This chapter will also consider why African
American women have not been represented by very well-known actresses
on the "big screen" unlike their male counterparts, Denzel Washington star
ring in Malcolm X (1992), David Oyelowo starring in Selma (2015), and
Forest Whitaker starring in The Butler (2013) Director (Lee Daniels). In
order to truly assess the correlation between mischaracterization of these
important women and their treatment throughout the civil rights movement,
it is essential to critically analyze whether or not it is acceptable to believe the
argument that film is a historical source, or is it easier to learn to believe
films' representations of history are pure fiction. This section will examine
the possibilities and problems of using film as a historical source by consider
ing arguments from film and history theorist Robert Rosenstone and views
from Amy Curtis and the Association of Black Women Historians. This part
of research will also touch upon the ongoing character of "Mammy" that
many African American women are made to portray still.
When studying the use of film along with history it is difficult to ignore the
debate of whether or not it is acceptable to refer to film as an accurate histori
cal source. Film and history theorist Robert Rosenstone (1995) recognizes
two main approaches that he claims characterize historical film as a correc
tive to "real history" (p. 6). The first approach is the "explicit" approach,
which Rosenstone believes is led by "concrete political and social concerns"
during the time a film is made. The second is the "implicit" approach, where
an existing cinematic piece is judged by "historical criteria" at a later point
(p. 6). Rosenstone offers an interesting interpretation of using film as a his
torical source. He suggests that historians would not learn about the past
through film when studying a field outside their areas of expertise (p. 6). For
example, Rosenstone (1982) suggests that many American people would
have learnt about Gandhi primarily from the film Gandhi (p.6). This shows
the importance of filmmakers' inaccuracies as many people who seek to learn
about history through the source of film will believe the mischaracterizations,
something that will be argued later in this section. However, this argument is
opposed by many scholars. Historian Peniel Joseph (2015) believes that
many celebrated films often dramatize historical events, arguing that films
are not scholarly books and believes people should not learn about historical
events through films. For example, Steven Spielberg (2012) Lincoln com
pletely dismisses the iconic abolitionist Frederick Douglass from the film,
even though Douglass met with President Lincoln 3 times. Joseph argues that
Spielberg and Screenwriter Tony Kushner made this difficult choice to erase
this from the story which did not affect the films' chance of being deemed an
artistic achievement and worthy of awards. Similarly, Barbara Reynolds
(2015) argues that although the misrepresentations of African American
activists in film, which will be expanded on later in this section, will not
affect those who believe the theoiy that filmmakers are not in fact historians,
it is still wrong to distort history this way. She argues that it is wrong for film
makers to use false history and to fictionalize civil rights activists as this
often diminishes the historic truth of these activists' lives, particularly when
those people, such as Coretta Scott King, who is heavily mischaracterized in
Selma, can no longer defend themselves (Reynolds, 2015). Reynolds con
tends that filmmakers often take a myth and make it seem like reality, espe
cially as it consists of more drama than the truth, as this usually makes an
award winning film. However, criticizing a film for not being historically
accurate suggests that inaccurate equals bad. Elaine Teng (2015) argues that
film making, like all storytelling, is prejudiced—even manipulative. Teng
also contends that films are the expression of the director's dream of a narra
tive, and one must not take credit away from an award winning film simply
for portraying the film how the director envisioned it. Rosenstone offers an
insightful solution to the problem of opposing theories of using film as a
historical source. He suggests that the unsystematic nature of history on film,
and the lack of professional control insofar as a historian does not approve the
film's accuracy before it is released, makes it even more essential that histo
rians who are passionate about public history, must learn how to read and
judge film (Rosenstone, 1995, p. 18). To overcome the stigma of turning to
film to learn history, one must learn how to intercede between the historical
world of the filmmaker and that of the historian. Therefore, historians will
have to reassess the standards for history or must learn to negotiate between
the standards of historians and those of filmmakers.
Selma
When Selma hit the "big-screen" in 2015, the opportunity arose for director
Ava DuVernay to shed light upon the important African American women
activists who risked their lives to attempt to gain racial equality. However,
the film has been criticized for a number of misrepresentations. Julian
Bond, a social activist and leader in the civil rights movement, argues that
the film's inaccuracies are "tremendously irritating" (Blackmon, 2015). As
Reynolds points out, supporters of President Lyndon Johnson have con
demned his portrayal as an antagonist who only unwillingly supported the
Voting Rights Act after attempting to obstruct the Selma effort (Reynolds,
2015). However, all the criticism has ignored the remarkably disconcerting
mischaracterization of the movement's most important figures. As Reynolds
(2015) argues, more specifically the portrayal of Coretta Scott King is
"pure Hollywood fiction." She argues that DuVernay's depiction of King
shows her as "timidly" accepting the rumors that her husband corrupted
their marriage and tearfully asks whether he loves his mistresses (Reynolds,
2015). This is a truly inaccurate representation of King, and it diminishes
her achievements during the struggle of the civil rights movement. King
herself explained that she hopes "... someday people will see Coretta,"
and not "an attachment to a vacuum cleaner: the wife of Martin, then the
widow of Martin," that she is so often portrayed to be in films such as
Selma (2015). She continues to explain that she was "... never just a wife,
nor a widow," in fact, she "was always more than a label" (Reynolds, 2015).
This argument that DuVernay portrays these women in a historically inac
curate way is mirrored in other work such as Jesse McCarthy's (2015)
"'Selma' Ignores the Radical Grassroots Politics of the Civil Rights
Movement." McCarthy agrees with Reynolds by arguing that Selma and
director DuVernay miss an opportunity to evoke a women's empowerment
history. In the film, women are portrayed as consoling, supporting of their
men, and enduring—all gender stereotyped roles. The truth is these women
were the backbone of the movement, creating strategies and taking action
to help the movement. Selma, as McCarthy (2015) notes, portrays the
movement through the leadership of Martin Luther King and his "cadre" of
SNCC supporters. McCarthy (2015) continues to talk of the false represen
tation of women in the film by arguing that the film is so focused on pre
serving the charismatic male leadership from Martin Luther King during
the movement, that it fails to honor the "female fountainheads" of the
movement such as Septima Clark, Ella Baker, and Fannie Lou Hamer
whose work on voter registration and literacy were the real "incubators" of
activism and irrigators of the civil rights movement. Although the film does
in fact include Diane Nash, SNCC's cofounder, she is only briefly seen
among the background of the male leaders and the audience only learns her
name as the camera scans over an FBI document. As McCarthy (2015)
argues, "nothing in the film illustrates her fiery commitment or talented
militancy. Bond (2015) expands on this by stating that the film leaves Nash
still as a "forgotten person (p. 1)." When talking of the Selma to Montgomery
march, Bond contends that it was in fact Nash and her husband James Bevel
who created the idea and pushed for direct action, as pointed out in primary
documents in Chapter 1. He highlights that it was not Martin Luther King
nor was it Lyndon Johnson's idea as the film portrays it to be. On the con
trary, it is also important to consider the opposing views this argument has
regarding Selma's mischaracterizations of African American women activ
ists. Joseph's "'Selma' Offers a Window Into the Civil Rights Movement"
believes that DuVernay wisely chooses to ignore the stereotypes of present
ing the film solely focusing on Martin Luther King and his efforts during
the movement. This argument is difficult to consider when it does not pro
vide any specific examples from the film that highlight this. As McCarthy
notes, it is clear that the film portrays the movement through the leadership
of Martin Luther King solely. Joseph (2015) also considers DuVernay's
portrayal of main African American women figures such as Annie Lee
Cooper (Oprah Winfrey) and Diane Nash as an illustration of the African
American woman's "fierce activist commitment and leadership in civil
rights struggles." Joseph (2015) argues that the film represents a histori
cally accurate portrayal of African American women, although he does
state that these are indeed "subtle and nuanced depictions." One can con
sider the argument that Selma is a true portrayal of African American
women, only in the sense that these women's efforts were ignored during
the time of the movement and therefore by not focusing on them in the film
with the recognition they deserve, it comes across as an accurate represen
tation of how they were treated at the time. Another negative portrayal in
Selma is Annie Lee Cooper's character that is played by Oprah Winfrey.
The real-life civil rights activist Cooper, as mentioned in section one, was
wrestled to the ground by Sheriff Jim Clark while attempting to register to
vote. Although this picture of her being tackled to the ground made head
lines, it portrayed her as an aggressive woman and did not in fact highlight
her efforts to register to vote. Cooper's contribution in Selma fades as the
film does and DuVernay does not give Cooper the amount of recognition
that she deserves. Historian Gary May (2015) argues that DuVernay's big
gest failure in representing history in Selma is missing the object of her
purpose to highlight Selma's civil rights movement. May (2015) continues
to argue that DuVernay's false account of what happened between Cooper
and Sheriff Clark does not fully enrich the true events. The first piece of
crucial information DuVernay dismisses from the film is the fact that
Cooper had lost her right to vote on returning to Selma. Second, after
attempting and failing, she was unable to gain employment. This is vital
information to include in the film if DuVernay truly wanted to showcase the
mistreatment of African American women during the movement.
The Help
The Help, set in 1960s Mississippi when the civil rights movement was in full
swing, is set through the eyes of White protagonist, Skeeter (Emma Stone).
During the period that The Help is set in, legal segregation and economic
inequalities limited African Americans women's employment opportunities.
However, the film focuses on two main African American women who work
as maids for privileged White families, Minny Jackson (Octavia Spencer)
and Aibileen Clark (Viola Davis). There has been much criticism of the film's
accuracies as it was set at a time when the civil rights movement was rife but
makes hardly any reference to the movement or to the often violent struggle
that African American women faced. One particular inaccuracy The Help fea
tures is in relation to the domestic abuse that maids regularly faced. The film
even refuses to show Minny's husband's violence against her on screen,
which was a regular occurrence for African American women during the civil
rights movement, as argued in Chapter 1 (Laurier, 2011). Gwendolyn Zoharah
Simmons notes in the first Chapter 1, that during the movement, along with
many others, she faced sexual harassment within the SNCC. Films such as
Douglas Sirk's (1959) Imitation of Life and Raoul Walsh's (1957) Band of
Angels both point to the source of racism in social relationships and condi
tions; The Help, however, ignored the reality of the time and removes the
blemishes of its "good" characters. The Association of Black Women
Historians (2011) argue that The Help's representation of these women as
maids is a "disappointing resurrection of 'Mammy,'" a mythical stereotype of
Black women who were compelled, either by slavery or segregation, to serve
White families. Depicted as caretakers of Whites, the humorous distortion of
"Mammy" allowed America to ignore the systemic racism that bound African
American women to low paying jobs where employers regularly exploited
them. They argue that the problem with the popularity of The Help's repre
sentation of these maids as a "Mammy" figure is that it reveals a contempo
rary nostalgia for the days when an African American woman could only
dream of cleaning the White House as opposed to living there. However,
these opinions are not supported by John McWhorter. McWhorter (2011)
argues that The Help is not a racist film—he suggests that it is the critics that
are indeed racist. He argues that, although the film is not essentially all his
torically accurate, but if it was it would be "psychologically implausible,
dramatically reductive, preachy ..." to watch, and would not be an award
winning film. "I cannot accept that this would be preferable for any reason to
the solid, affecting Hollywood drama that I took in" (McWhorter, 2011).
Conversely, as Professor Trysh Travis (2016) argues, the more historically
accurate the film becomes, it would be deemed less likely to seem realistic to
its target audience of White women like the protagonist and also the director
of the film and author of the book.
the 1950s due to filmmakers at MGM finding that the character could be
adapted to the suburban consumerism of the decade without changing her
behavior (Lehman, 2007, p. 94). This therefore meant that African American
women activists' efforts in the movement were being ignored on and off the
screen, with racist, stereotypical portrayals guiding the public's opinions of
African American even more negatively It therefore is correct to argue that
African American women's "invisibility" during the movement results in
their negative portrayal in modern films. The absence of African American
women in starring roles is still an ongoing issue. If the 2011 Oscars are exam
ined, the only African American woman to be nominated and the only African
American woman to win an Oscar, Viola Davis playing Aibileen Clark and
Octavia Spencer playing Minny Jackson, both played the roles of maids in
The Help. This shows that Hollywood has not come far since the first African
American woman, Hattie McDaniel, won an Oscar in 1939 for her role as
"Mammy" in Gone With the Wind (1939). Brent Staples (2012) argues that
these women would not have found starring roles elsewhere had they refused
the role of a maid in The Help. With these facts, there is no surprise that when
the survey conducted as part of this research asked the question "Out of the
films that focus on the Civil Rights Movement, are there any well-known
actresses that stand out to you?" Twelve people out of 20 answered that they
could not name any actress featured in a civil rights film, and 19 people out
of the 39 respondents skipped the question, implying they do not know either.
Only eight out of 39 could name an actress and one of those was Emma
Stone, a popular White actress, meaning only 18% could name an African
American actress in a civil rights film. It is hardly surprising that when asked
the question "Can you recall any famous actors that star in Civil Rights
Movement films? (e.g., Malcolm X, The Butler)," 14 out of 39 people could
name a male actor who starred in a civil rights film. This shows that African
American women are not represented by well-known actresses unlike their
male counterparts who are portrayed by famous actors such as Denzel
Washington who plays the role in the film Malcolm X (1992). The current
problem is that African American women's contributions in American film
are not often recognized, and when they are, they rarely make it on to the "big
screen," unlike their male counterparts. With Oprah Winfrey being the excep
tion in films such as Selma and The Butler (2013), the role of important char
acters in modern civil rights film have been played by well-known African
American male actors. For example, Malcolm X (1992) where Malcolm is
played by Denzel Washington, Selma where Martin Luther King Jr. is played
by David Oyelowo, and The Butler (2013) where Forest Whitaker took on the
main character. The problem continues with African American women activ
ists from the movement not being well represented in modern film. Take the
made-for-TV film, The Rosa Parks Story (2002), for example, where Angella
Bassett plays Parks. One of the most important African American women
activists from the movement has only been represented in a made-for-TV
film where she was not represented by a very well-known actress; whereas
Martin Luther King Jr. currently has 10 films or television films portraying
his effort in the civil rights movement.
Conclusion
The aim of this research was to argue that the way African American women
are represented in modern film is a result of the "invisibility" that they face
during the civil rights movement in America during the 1950s and 1960s.
This article intended to do this by examining firsthand accounts from women
during the movement alongside other possible factors that affected their
"invisibility" such as male leaders' views and the media coverage from the
time of the movement. This work set out to examine two modern civil right
films, Selma and The Help, in order to analyze the accuracy of history and
portrayal of African American women during the movement. To conclude
this research, it is evident that African American women's efforts during th
civil rights movement have been misrepresented in modern civil rightsfilm
and it is clear that this is a result of their lack of recognition at the time of the
movement. Chapter 1 shows how African American women activists faced
the "Triple Constraint" but often tried to overcome this due to an inner driv
they were forced to find. Nash argues that the oppressor is usually an attitud
such as sexism; therefore, the first chapter argued that male leaders such as
Malcolm X held a negative attitude toward women and this contributed to th
lack of recognition they received. This chapter also argued the media's nega
tive and scant coverage of the efforts of the women activists, such as Cooper
attempt to vote, led to increasing "invisibility" for these women. Chapter 2
considers the debates surrounding the accuracy of using film as a historical
source and overall argued as Peniel Joseph (2015) believes, that many cele
brated films often dramatize historical events, arguing that films are not
scholarly books and believes people should not learn about historical events
through films. It is evident from studying the films Selma and The Help tha
they negatively portray the role African American women played during the
civil rights movement. This is highlighted in Chapter 2 when this researc
examines Selma and argues that specifically the portrayal of Coretta Scott
King is "pure Hollywood fiction" and DuVernay's negative portrayal o
African American activists during the movement truly diminishes their
achievements during the struggle of the civil rights movement. This is also
evident in The Help. As argued by the Association ofBlack Women Historians
Funding
The author received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publica
tion of this article.
References
Adams, M., & Bell, L. A. (2016). Teaching for diversity and socialjustice. New Y
NY: Routledge.
Armstrong, J. (2015). Civil rights movement film. In The Cambridge companion to
American civil rights literature (p. 86). New York, NY: Cambridge University
Press.
Association of Black Women Historians. (2011). An open statement to the fans of The
Help. Retrieved from http://www.abwh.org/images/pdf/TheHelp-Statement.pdf
Baldwin, L. V., & Dekar, P. R. (2013). "In an inescapable network of mutuality":
Martin Luther King, Jr. and the globalization of an ethical ideal. Eugene, OR:
Cascade Books.
Barnett, B. M. (1993). Invisible Southern Black women leaders in the civil rights
movement: The triple constraints of gender, race, and class. Gender & Society,
7,162-182.
Berger, M. A. (2011). Seeing through race: A reinterpretation of civil rights photog
raphy. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Blackmon, D. (2015). Civil rights legend Julian Bond on "Selma." Miller Center.
Retrieved from http://archive.millercenter.org/ridingthetiger/civil-rights-legend
julian-bond-on-selma
Hall, S. (1992). What is this "Black" in Black popular culture. In Black popular cul
ture: A project by Michele Wallace (p. 24). Seattle, WA: Bay Press.
Hudson-Weems, C. (1993). From Malcolm Little to El Hajj Malik El Shabazz:
Malcolm's evolving attitude toward the Africana women. Western Journal of
Black Studies, 17, 27.
Isaacs, S. T. (2010). Portrayal of African Americans in the media: An examination of
law and order. University Park: Pennsylvania State University.
Joseph, P. (2015). "Selma" offers a window into the civil rights movement. Newsweek
http://europe.newsweek.com/selma-offers-window-civil-rights-movement
297957?rm=eu
Laurier, J. (2011, August 27). The Help: A civil rights era film that ignores the civil
rights movement. World Socialist Web Site. Available from Wsws.org
Lee, S (Director). (1992). Malcolm X [Motion Picture], United States: Warner Bros.
Lehman, C. P. (2007). The colored cartoon: Black representation in American ani
mated short films, 1907-1954. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
Love, D. (2013). Mammy depictions in film: Effects on African American women's
perceptions, beliefs, and eating behaviors. McNair Scholars Journal, 15, 57.
Travis, T. (2016). Is the help realistic? It depends. Black Past. Retrieved from http://
www.blackpast.org/perspectives/help-realistic-it-depends
Author Biography
Martha Lott is a recent graduate of American History from Swansea University in
South Wales.